Presented at the Penny Arcade Expo 2013 in Seattle (Wolfman Theatre).
the eye of the beholder? Is one's miserable experience not simply subjective opinion? Is there such a thing as an objectively "bad" game? More importantly, however we define the term, do bad games serve a purpose? Much as how without evil, there can be no good, without the worst of gaming, how could we possibly recognize the best?
It turns out that the problem is not in defining what makes a game "bad," but in what makes a game a "game." Some games are great at certain things, but terrible at others. Candyland teaches children colors and counting, but is a terrible candidate for a serious tournament. Dungeons & Dragons is great for that heroic fantasy adventure, but not so much for your future cyberpunk transhumanist court drama. Silver Surfer serves as a lesson (and a warning) to future game designers the world over.
Join us for a lively discussion of the worst of gaming, what that truly means, and what we can learn from "bad" games. You may find that some of the worst games ever made can be some of the most fun you've ever had.