Skip to main content
Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo

tv   The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer  CNN  August 10, 2020 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT

3:00 pm
folks to leave the area, to clear it out. from my vantage point right now, i see several folks standing on the roof of the white house, as is usual. they're typically up there monitoring lafayette park, monitoring this area. i don't see anyone actually inside the park. >> all right. it looks like the president is -- not to interrupt you, but the president is walking back in. let's see what's going on. >> so, thank you very much. sorry for that. there was a shooting outside of the white house, and it seems to be very well under control. i'd like to thank the secret service for doing their always quick and very effective work, but there was an actual shooting, and somebody's been taken to the hospital. i don't know the condition of the person. seems that the person was shot by secret service, so we'll see what happens. and yeah, did you have
3:01 pm
something? >> do you have any details about the shooting? were they targeting -- >> there are no details. we just found out just now. it was outside of the white house. this area right over here. and they'll have details for you in a little while. somebody is taken to the hospital. it seems that the shooting was done by law enforcement at that person, at the suspect. it was the suspect who was shot, and this just took place. a couple of people outside. i noticed a man named john roberts, who you know very well. >> yes. >> he reported that he heard shots. he was outside, and he heard two shots. >> mr. president, was this -- >> i have heard -- >> we don't know yet. we don't know. they're going to find out. >> do you know if the individual said anything, sir, mentioned your name, anything like that? >> we don't know that. >> can you confirm it was the secret service that did shoot this suspect? >> it does seem to be. >> were you taken to the bunker? >> no, just taken to the oval office. >> what did they tell you?
3:02 pm
>> just told me, he said, sir, can you please come with me. you were surprised, ifz surprised also. i think it's probably pretty unusual, but very, very professional people. they do a fantastic job, as you know. so, it seems to me -- it seems to be, from what i said, there was a shooting, it was law enforcement shot someone, seems to be the suspect and the suspect is now on the way to the hospital. i can't tell you the condition of the suspect. >> was the suspect armed? >> there was nobody else injured. there was no other law enforcement injured. and i just want to -- we'll get on to the press conference but i do want to thank secret service. they are fantastic. >> was the suspect armed? do you know? >> from what i understand, the answer is yes. >> he was armed? >> that's what i understand. i don't know. you'll have to ask them. >> do you know what kind of weapon? what type of weapon? >> i don't know. >> was it a male or a female? >> they'll have a detailed --
3:03 pm
maybe a breeiefing for you outse later. >> did they say anything against you personally? >> i don't know. it might not have had anything to do with me. it might have been something else, but it was on the outside of the premises, the wall, the -- as you know, the fencing, especially the new fencing that they put up, is very powerful. but it was on the outside of the white house. okay? and they'll have a full report. secret service in a little while will have a full report. >> are you rattled by this at all, mr. president? >> do i seem rattled? it's unfortunate that this is a world but the world's always been a dangerous place. it's not something that's unique. the world has been -- you look back over the centuries, the world has been a dangerous place. very dangerous place, and it will continue, i guess, for a period of time. >> does this make you think differently about your personal safety inside the white house? >> no, i feel very safe with the secret service. they're fantastic people.
3:04 pm
they're the best of the best, and they're highly trained. i don't know if anybody got to walk outside, but there were a lot of terrific-looking people ready to go if something was necessary. the people at the highest level of law enforcement. there's nobody like these people. so they just wanted me to step aside for a little while just to make sure that everything was cleared outside because it was right in this area. >> why did you come back, mr. president? why did you decide after that -- obviously, it created a lot of commotion. what made you decide to come back and continue the briefing? >> well, i didn't think about not coming back. i said, am i able to go back? they said you have to wait a little while. i waited a little while, as you know, in the oval office area, and i said, can i get back now? they said, yes. and they have a lot of fortification outside just in case. but it was one person. okay? >> mr. president, you said the shooting was outside. how far away from the white
3:05 pm
house? >> they're going to be giving you a full briefing in a little while. >> was it pretty far from the white house? >> i can only tell you they're going to give you a briefing. it was outside of the premises, near the fence. >> so pretty close to here. >> pretty close. so i was telling you that the dow jones and the s&p 500 are now 50% above the march level. nasdaq is setting new records. it's already broken the record, despite the situation of having the china virus. we have new jobs are rising and unemployment is falling faster than nearly anyone thought and over the past three months, we've created over 9 million jobs and that's a record, a three-month record. if you add it up, it's a three-month record by far, and we've beaten expectations by 12 million. we're 12 million above expectations, which is pretty
3:06 pm
remarkable. today, we had great reports on new job openings, and there's clearly a housing boom, which has been incredible numbers in both housing and an automobile boom. we've rarely seen anything like it and it's going on right now in america. inventories are at rock bottom. used car sales are at record levels, and we will have rebuilt. we're doing a rebuilding like nobody's ever seen. it's a big plus for manufacturing and construction, so construction's getting close to record territory. manufacturing's doing very well. the car companies are doing great. very happy for michigan, the state of michigan. we have a lot of car companies moving in, a lot of plants are being built and expanded in michigan and ohio. there is no reason why the economy can't grow at a 20% pace in the third quarter. that would be a record, and interestingly, it will be a
3:07 pm
number that's going to be announced before november 3rd. it gets announced probably around november 1st, which is very interesting. but it's going to grow at a very substantial pace based on all of the numbers we're looking at and probably a lot more substantial than we originally thought. we're creating new incentives to work in jobs and we're also providing much-needed assistance to those who are still suffering from the effects of the pandemic contraction and the contraction is now, well, we have the pandemic, we have a lot of great things happening in terms of the vaccines and therapeutics, as you know, and i think we'll be making tremendous progress over the next period of a few months and certainly before the end of the year. i think we'll have a vaccine before the end of the year, very substantially, and we may have a therapeutic resolvement very quickly, very, very quickly, and frankly, that's the one i'd
3:08 pm
rather have faster because you go in, you give a transfusion or a shot to people that are very ill and they'd be able to come out of the hospital the next day or a few days later. if the states participate in our core sharing unemployment plan, we are going to be doing something very, very interesting with all of the things that we announced on saturday. i don't have to repeat what they are. you know very well, and we've had some tremendous success already if you look at what's happening with the stock market and people are very thrilled at what we're doing. we'd like to get the democrats to focus on other than what they're focusing on, which is a bailout of poorly running states. we have many great-running states, states that are setting records, and let's see what happens with respect to that. but the -- we're looking at also considering a capital gains tax cut, which would create a lot more jobs, so we're looking very
3:09 pm
seriously at a capital gains tax cut and also at an income tax cut for middle income families. we're looking at expanding the tax cuts that we've already done but specifically for middle income families, and you'll be hearing about that in the upcoming few weeks. and i think it will be very exciting. so, a capital gains tax is going to be -- a lot of people put to work, and it will be a cut in the capital gains tax and also a cut in the middle income income tax. so i now want to just discuss a little quick brief and then we'll take a few more questions. but we took some. who would have known we were going to take questions before we started, right? is that right, jennifer? but that's the way it happens sometimes. we want to discuss, if we might, the china virus and the world
3:10 pm
continues its fight against this horrible plague. countries on every continent are seeing increases in cases. we have a rapid increase only in cases where -- it's very interesting because we're so far ahead of testing, we have more cases. if we had much smaller testing, we'd have fewer, but we feel that having testing is a very important thing. it's a great record to have in many ways. we've tested, i guess, close to 65 million people right now and nobody's even close to that number. no other country is close. india would be second at 11 million, and they have 1.5 billion people. so, we have the number one testing anywhere in the world by far, and we also have, i think, the highest quality tests. we have a lot of different ones but we have the highest quality, including the short-term and the lab tests. the lab tests take a little bit longer. and dr. birx was telling me a little while ago that we're down
3:11 pm
to two days and two and a half days on getting your result on the lab tests. the other ones, you get them in 5 minutes to 15 minutes, so that's exciting. but countries in every continent are seeing increases in cases in recent days, cases have rapidly increased in japan and australia, unfortunately. and they're now experiencing higher peaks than they did in march. to the south of our border, cases have continued to surge in mexico, central america, argentina, colombia, peru, brazil, and throughout latin america is really the hot spot. it's posing a major challenge for this continent. latin america is now the region with the most number of confirmed cases by far, despite a relative scarcity of testing, so when you think of that, that means it's pretty much on fire. they're having a hard time and we're helping them. we're sending them there numbers of ventilators, which we're
3:12 pm
making by the thousands every month. and we're helping latin america very much. it's hard for them to come into the country because we have big sections of wall up now, the new wall is being built, which people don't talk about. they used to talk about nothing but the wall. now that it's being built, they're not talking about it so much, but it's helped us because we're up to almost -- we're getting close to 280 miles. 280 miles in the most important areas, so that's helping us a lot in terms of not having people come in to the country who are infected with the coronavirus. this global trend underscores the persistence of the virus, including nations that apply the strictest and most punishing lockdowns. you have nations that are really tough on the lockdowns, and they're getting hit very hard. that's why my administration is pursuing a science-based approach that protects the most vulnerable, preserves hospital
3:13 pm
capacity, and focuses on the delivery and development of treatments and ultimately the vaccine. i feel strongly that we will have a vaccine by the end of the year, and it will be put in service maybe even as we get it because we're all set, militarily, we're using our military to distribute the vaccine. and logistically, there's nobody like this group of people. i meet with them a lot and they're ready to go. as soon as they have it, they'll be going. but more importantly, the therapeutics, as i said. i think the therapeutics could be great, initially speaking. i think that would be -- if i had my choice, but you're going to have them both very soon. at the same time, we urge all americans to apply common sense mitigation. you all know what that mitigation is. everybody knows it by heart now. nearly half of all of the deaths from the china virus in the united states have occurred in nursing homes and long-term care
3:14 pm
facilities. that's why we have delivered funding, equipment, and rapid testing to our nation's nursing homes to protect those at high risk. we're very focused on nursing homes and senior citizens' areas anywhere that we have senior citizens who are very, very focused, we've delivered over 1,800 rapt point of care testing devices. those are very quick. and shipped over 700,000 tests to nursing homes. nursing homes and are being protected like never before. the united states faces a unique range of challenges that requires our constant vigilance. america has the largest at-risk population of any developed country by far, 1.5 million residents of nursing homes, about 5 times that of the united kingdom and other european countries. our country also has a higher prevalence of underlying conditions that this virus targets, yet we have fewer deaths per capita than the
3:15 pm
united kingdom and most other peer nations in western europe, so that's an important -- we have fewer deaths per capita than the united kingdom and most other nations in western europe. and heading for even stronger numbers, but one person is too much as far as i'm concerned. should have never been allowed to happen. should have never been allowed to escape china. nationwide, we continue to see encouraging signs in the last seven days, nationwide cases declined by 14%. hospitalizations decreased by 7%. fatalities decreased by 9%. arizona and florida are improving rapidly with fewer patients coming to emergency rooms by far as well as decreasing cases, decreasing fate fatalities, and expected and expanded hospital capacity so we have an expanded hospital capacity. it's pretty dramatic when you look at it, meaning we have more room should we need it.
3:16 pm
so, lot of tremendous work has been done. in texas, likewise, the number of patients going to emergency rooms has dropped from july by more than two-thirds. that's a lot. nevertheless, we continue to monitor texas very closely. terrific governor, terrific people working on that whole situation in texas, especially at its test positivity rate, which rose over 20% this weekend overall. cases in texas are coming down and have stabilized in the border counties. that's, again, where you have the wall and you're next to, in some cases, the wall. in some cases, you'll have it very shortly. you'll have it all built within a number of months, but those areas were hit very hard, and they're likely cases from mexico that come in, back and forth from the border. they come in legally.
3:17 pm
as doctors have found more effective ways to treat patients, the fatality rate continues to improve. texas has one sixth the fatality rate of new york and new jersey, that they had in april, and the -- if you look at new york and new jersey, they worked very, very hard, but very heavy density and they had a lot of different kinds of difficulty. the fatality rates in florida and arizona are between 25% and 33% of the peak rates of new york and new jersey. again, different climate, different grouping, different density, tremendously different density. in california, the situation is starting to stabilize and improve throughout the major metropolitan areas. statewide, hospitalizations continue to decline very substantially with about 20% fewer inpatients now than on july 21st. california is starting to really show signs of correcting. we're monitoring regions with
3:18 pm
increasing cases, including boston, chicago, and the midwest, and we're monitoring them very, very strongly and very, very hard. i do want to say that i think at the end of a fairly short period of time, you're going to be in very, very good shape all over our country. every loss of life is tragic and all nations must work together to defeat this horrible virus. my administration is going to continue to save as many lives as possible. we are working round the clock, everybody, i mean, it's incredible how hard they're working, and people from other countries were working with them also and they're working very hard. this is something that's now attacked 188 different countries. there are a wide range of factors that determine how the virus impacts a nation, such as age, underlying conditions -- underlying conditions is a very big one. if you're sick in any way, if --
3:19 pm
especially, they say, heart and diabetes, that's not a good thing to have if you -- if you're going to have this, if you're going to catch it, so we're trying to protect especially those people that have problems with their heart or diabetes and levels of preexisting immunity resulting from past exposure to other viruses, which happens. we must stop politicizing the virus and instead be united in our condemnation of how this virus came to america, how this virus came to the world, and we're going to figure it out and we're going to find out, and we're very angry about it. on the therapeutics and vaccine updates, three vaccine candidates are currently in phase 3 clinical trials, something that would have been impossible under the previous administration or any other administration and several others are showing considerable
3:20 pm
promise. we have great companies, very well-known companies. i think everyone in this room would know these companies but they're the biggest and the best in the world, and we're working with other foreign companies and countries that have been really working very closely with us. we're trading, we're not looking to do anything but come up with the answer and we really don't -- we don't care. we want to come up with the answer, if it's one of ours or one of theirs, it's okay. we have to come up with the answer, and we're very close to getting it. some people think we have it. we may have it. we have the best scientists in the world racing to develop a safe vaccine that will end this pandemic, save millions of lives, and that's millions of lives all over the world. and end the harm inflicted by this virus to our society and to all other nations. last week, the nih began a clinical trial of remdesivir paired with another approved
3:21 pm
antiviral drug and anti-inflammatory drug. you know that remdesivir has been very successful, and now they're experimenting with others, including antivirals and anti-inflammatories, and they're having some very interesting success. we've secured enough remdesivir to treat over 650,000 patients. on saturday, i took executive action in a signing to save american jobs and support american workers. i signed directives to give a payroll tax holiday with the understanding that after the election, on the assumption that it would be victorious for an administration that's done a great job, we will be ending that tax. we'll be terminating that tax. on the other hand, the other group wants to raise taxes, and they may want to leave it where you pay it, but the payroll tax
3:22 pm
is a big deal for people. it's a tremendous saving for people, and we're going to be doing it, and we intend to terminate it at the end of the appropriate period of time. it's for those making less than $100,000 through the end of 2020 to provide an extra $400 per week also in unemployment benefits and to extend the freeze on home evictions. we want to extend the freeze so people aren't evicted. it's not their fault that the virus came from china. it's china's fault, and to suspend payments on student loans through the end of the year and then beyond. and again, you know, they're paying interest on loans and they're not allowed to go to their college, so we're going to suspend payments on student loans through the end of the year and then -- another extension, most likely, because it's not fair to the students to have to pay when the colleges aren't doing the job of getting
3:23 pm
open, and i think probably many of them could be open. so, i want to thank you all. i'm sorry for the disturbance before. things happen. and if you'd like, we can take a few questions. >> mr. president, thank you. i appreciate it. kayleigh said you've been working around the clock to get these investment unemployment payments to americans. can you give me your timetable? are we talking next week, two weeks, a month? >> steve, what do you think? >> so, mr. secretary, you're saying when? >> i think within the next week or two, most of the states will be able to execute. >> got it. and -- >> by the way, the gentleman you know, everybody, you know russell. but this is scott atlus. scott is a very famous man who's also very highly respected, stanford, and he's working with us and will be working with us on the coronavirus, and he has
3:24 pm
many great ideas, and he thinks what we've done is really good and now we'll take it to a new level, and so it's great to have scott working along with us, and we appreciate it very much, scott. thank you very much. really terrific. we've had some great discussions. >> to follow up on that, mr. president, you mentioned the states. have all the governors signed on to this? >> we just had a meeting with the governors, and they were very anxious to get money for the people in their states, and if they -- depending on the state, we have the right to do what we want food. we can terminate the 25% or we don't have to do that. so we'll see what it is, depends on the individual states. but a lot of money will be going to a lot of people very quickly. and i've instructed the secretary of the treasury to move as quickly as he can, all right? so we'll get it done. yes, please. >> i have a question. i wanted to just ask you to be clear on the incident outside. there's a fairly significant perimeter around the white house, so did it concern you at
3:25 pm
all that someone who was armed was able to get so close that you needed to be removed from the briefing? >> i don't know if he was close or not, he or she. i don't know if it was a he or she. but i have such confidence in these people, they're so good. and i don't think the person breached anything. it was on the outside grounds so i don't believe anything was breached. i asked that question. they were relatively far away. >> i just, on the coronavirus, 97,000 children tested positive for coronavirus in the last two weeks in july according to the american academy of pediatrics. does that give you any pause about schools reopening for in-person learning? >> no. because they may have, as you would call it a case, and maybe a case, but it's also a case where there's a tiny -- it's a tiny fraction of death, tiny fraction, and they get better very quickly. yeah, they have -- they may have
3:26 pm
it for a short period of time, but as you know, the seriousness of it, in terms of what it leads to, is extraordinarily small. very, very much less than 1%. >> so you still believe that children are essentially immune? >> yeah, i think that for the most part, they do very well. i mean, they don't get very sick. they don't catch it easily. they don't get very sick, and according to the people that i have spoken to, they don't transport it or transfer it to other people or certainly not very easily. so, yeah, i think schools have to open. we want to get our economy going. we have incredible numbers despite this. if we could get this going, i think it's a very important thing for the economy to get the schools going. jonathan, go ahead. >> hey, mr. president. in ohio a few days ago, you said, quote, joe biden has hurt government. he's against government. the vice president has said he's a man of deep catholic faith and he's credited him for enduring
3:27 pm
immense personal challenge. what did you mean by that? >> if you look at the manifesto they've come up with and if you look at their stance on religion and things having to do very importantly with aspects of religion and faith, i don't think a man of deep religion would be agreeing to the bernie sanders plan. you take a look at what they have in it and you just -- you can't put that into the realm of a religious group of people, i will say that. and i think it's one of the reasons why if you look at polls, which i'm not a big believer in polls, i wouldn't -- if i was, i guess i wouldn't be standing here right now, and by the way, our poll numbers are going up very rapidly, as you know, and joe's are going down very rapidly. he'll have to come out of the basement, it looks like, pretty soon, because that, you know, it's one of those things, but no, if you look at the manifesto -- i call it the manifesto. a lot of people are calling it
3:28 pm
the manifesto. my opinion, it's further left than where bernie was before so normally you'd be left and you'd bring it to the center but some of the things that they have down there -- and i'm not only talking in terms of religion. i'm not talking even in terms of religion. but some of the things they have in the agreement made -- and this was an agreement made by bernie sanders and joe, it's a terrible thing. it would be a terrible thing for our country. it will destroy our country. we will go into a depression. we will put on regulation. we will double and triple taxes. we will -- it will be terrible for healthcare, just terrible. you have 180 million people lose their healthcare. it will be a terrible, terrible thing for our country. okay, yeah, please. >> thank you, sir. i'd like to ask you a question about something you said in bedminster as well. you said you're planning to issue an executive order to ensure that health insurance companies prevent or cover people with preexisting conditions and you said that
3:29 pm
that had never been done before, but that's -- that's not the case because that is the law under the affordable care act. so my question is, why do you need to issue an executive order for a law that is already existing? >> i didn't say -- i said, as an executive order. as you said, said, as an executive order, it hasn't been done before. we want to -- we want to be able to assure people that preexisting conditions is always taken care of. as you know, we've done a tremendous things having to do with the individual mandate. we got rid of the individual mandate from obamacare, which really ended obamacare as it would be officially known because the individual mandate was the biggest part. it was also the most unpopular part where you pay for a terrible privilege of overpaying for insurance. you pay not to have to pay for your healthcare, and that was a disaster for people and a very unpopular -- that was called the individual mandate, and we terminated that. and officially terminated that.
3:30 pm
and that was something that we have been given thanks for by many, many people, but the individual mandate will always be with us, the individual mandate termination will always be they can't start it up -- in fact, i don't even believe, you have to tell me, i don't believe it's been challenged and preexisting conditions, the republicans are 100% there and i'll be issuing at some point in the not too distant future a very strong statement on that, probably in the form of an executive order. >> why do you need, sir, to do an executive order if it's already a part of the -- >> just a double safety net and just to let people know that the republicans are totally, strongly in favor of preexisting condition -- taking care of people with preexisting conditions. it's a -- it's a signal to people. it's a second -- it's a second platform. we have preexisting conditions will be taken care of, 100%, by republicans and the republican
3:31 pm
party. i think it's a very -- i actually think it's a very important statement. yes, please? >> mr. president, do you still intend to try to hold an in-person g7 meeting in the united states at some point in august and september? have you lalready sent out invitations to do so? >> we're talking to them. i was on the phone with many of them yesterday with respect to lebanon, which is truly one of the saddest, most catastrophic things i've ever seen, and they have no idea how many people have died. they're having revolution right now in that country. it's just a terrible thing. but i was, yesterday, 8:00 in the morning, we had -- our time -- we had a big teleconference call. some of these people were there. i'm much more inclined to do it sometime after the election. we were going to do it in september. they'd like to do it. we could do it through teleconference or we could do it through a meeting, but i sort of am now suggesting -- i told my people yesterday, actually, why
3:32 pm
don't we do it sometime after the election when things are a little bit -- you have a little bit more time to think about it because it's very important. the g7 is very important. >> to that meeting? >> i don't know, but we have invited a number of people to the meeting. i certainly would invite him to the meeting. i think he's an important factor, but we will invite certain people that aren't in the g7. some people have already accepted. but we're going to be doing it after the election. i think it's a better atmosphere to have a g7. i think it's a lot -- i think it's just a better, calmer atmosphere to have a g7. yes, please. >> thank you, mr. president. i wanted to ask, actually, have you spoken to any democrats since friday? have they reached out to you about restarting negotiations? >> i've spoken to several democrats. i have not spoken to schumer and pelosi since then. >> do you expect to -- would you reach out at all to them? >> any time they want to meet,
3:33 pm
they're willing to negotiate, have a new proposal, we're more than happy to meet. >> they're hurting people very badly. this would have been so easy for them to do. and i saw that senator schumer said today on a show, i don't know what show, but he said today on a show that we should meet, we should do something, but you know, where has he been for -- how many weeks have you been negotiating? like four? and they should do something. it would have been so much easier than doing it the way we did it, but we did something that's very important and it's been very well received. >> thank you, mr. president. you tweeted earlier today that you're considering gettysburg as a venue for your speech for the rnc nomination acceptance speech. what's your thinking behind that as a possible location? >> i've been to gettysburg numerous times. it's a national park. it's a national historic site. it's incredible. you know, it's the history. it's incredible, actually, to me.
3:34 pm
it was a very important place and is a very important place in our country, so we're looking at that and we're looking at the white house. the white house would be very much easier for secret service. you see what just went on here. they're all here. just like you have your seats, they have their seats at the white house. so, there wouldn't be any expense or any extraordinary expense, and the white house would be a lovely place to do it also. least expensive place that you could do it would be at the white house. this is a government -- a government expense, and you know, look, i watch, also, with governments, i watch to make sure that we do what's right. but we're looking at gettysburg and we're looking at the white house, and we have other sites too, but i think these would be too really beautiful sites. jennifer? >> did you envision having an consequen audience for that speech? >> you could. i see john roberts. john, you were outside. you said you heard shots fired before? >> two shots in rapid succession
3:35 pm
just after you took the podium. >> and they were shots pretty much? >> certainly sounded -- >> you definitely know the difference. i know that. you know the difference. you thought they were shots, john? >> definitely sounded like gunfire. >> i saw your report inside. it was a good report too. thank you very much. appreciate it. jennifer, please. >> thank you, sir. can you give us an update on china? do you think your administration will respond to the sanctions that china announced this morning on american officials? >> well, we've already responded in many different ways. we're talking a lot about china. we shouldn't have been talking about china. we did a phase 1 deal and it was a wonderful deal and all of a sudden it means very little in the overall import of things. they should have never allowed what happened to the world, including us, but this was released into europe, and it was released into the u.s., and it was released all throughout the world, but it wasn't released into china, and we were doing numbers that will, you know,
3:36 pm
just were incredible and we hope to be able to do them perhaps even next year. i think we're going to have an incredible year next year but that will never pay for the loss of life in our country and all over the world. so, we are -- we view china differently than we did eight months ago. very much differently. >> yes, please. >> is there still any consideration of delisting chinese companies? is that an ongoing discussion? >> delisting? >> delisting chinese companies. >> we never comment on specific things. >> is it still on the table? >> there's no -- again, nothing specifically at the moment. no. are you talking about delisting -- on the exchange? >> yes. >> i'm sorry. yes. so just to be clear, we did make the recommendation and the s.e.c. will be putting out -- yes. as of the end of next year, if they do not fully comply, and that's chinese companies and the other companies, they all have to comply with the same exact accounting or they will be
3:37 pm
delisted on the exchanges. i was confused when you said that. >> jennifer, we're also talking on the wto, the world trade organization. china's treated much differently than we are. this should have been handled many years ago when it first happened but they're treated as a -- as a nation that's developing. they're treated as what they call a developing nation, which gives them tremendous incentives and advantages over and above what the united states gets, and over and above what other countries get also. this is a developing nation? i don't think so. i don't think for purposes of what we're talking about it should be. and we are putting in and we've already put in a request that china should no longer be declared a developing nation and have advantages over the u.s., and i told them that a year ago and i told them that two years ago and we put it in very pow powerfully that they should not have advantages over other countries, frankly, and they're not going to have any more
3:38 pm
advantages. this should have been done by numerous presidents a long time ago because it gives them a tremendous -- a tremendous boost over everybody else and it's a very unfair situation. no, we are upset with china because of what they did. china was not good. and china will be -- if you look the a what's going to happen, whether it's iran -- iran will make a deal with us in a month after the election's over if we win the election but the greatest dream in the world is that joe biden wins because they will own this country. china will own this country. north korea will own this country. they will own our country. and they're all waiting to see the election, and if we make a -- if we have a win on november 3rd, we will have a deal with, in my opinion, iran within one month and i don't know that we want to have a deal with china to be honest with you so i'm saying to myself, gee, but china wants us to lose very
3:39 pm
badly and you know who else is not happy with us winning? russia. the phony people that tell the story, the fake news stories about russia, it was just reported, the numbers, i raised $400 million extra in nato. you know that. it went from 130 to $400 billion and that's a year in order to strengthen up nato. nobody says that. we became the biggest energy exporter. we are now, if you look at what we have, we're energy independent. so many different things. our military is stronger than it ever was. we spent $2.5 trillion on our military. i exposed the terrible deal between germany and russia on the pipeline. nobody even knew about the pipeline, nobody knew about it, nobody talked about it. i said, what's this all about? so we protect germany from russia and germany pays russia billions of dollars a year for energy and it's a big portion of
3:40 pm
germany's energy. if i was a person that was a german citizen, i would not be happy with that deal because they're at a very big disadvantage. so, no, russia would not be happy, and i can tell you that china would not be happy at all. we've taken in tens of billions of dollars. there's your head of the treasury, steve, right? we've taken in tens of billions of dollars from china. we never took ten cents from china, not even ten cents, and $28 billion we gave to our farmers because they were targeted by china. they were actually targeted. and we gave $28 billion, compliments of china, to our great farmers and ranchers because they were unfairly targeted by china in order to make a better deal with us. i said, we're not going to do that. we're going to, instead of making a better deal, we're going to tariff you at very high numbers, 25%, 10%, and actually, numbers that could go up a lot, and we had a lot of money left
3:41 pm
over. after giving the $28 billion to the farmers and ranchers and some others, frankly, we had many, many billions of dollars left over, and we're still receiving that money, even though we made the deal, we're still receiving that money. so, if we win the election, we'll have deals with a lot of countries very fast. they're just waiting to see who wins because they are hoping -- they are hoping that joe biden wins. sleepy joe. and if he wins, you know what's going to happen? china will own us. our markets will crash. the 401(k)s will go down to practically nothing. stocks will go down to practically nothing. remember, stocks, these big companies, they're owned by millions of people that are carpeters and policemen and farmers and lots of other people, and they are the ones that benefit by having a good stock market, probably more than anybody else, but the 401(k)'s,
3:42 pm
the stocks, the economy will be in a shambles. they want to raise taxes. they want to triple taxes. they want to raise the corporate tax but they want to raise all taxes. ultimately, they can't pay for what they want to do anyway and what they're going to do is destroy your healthcare and destroy so many other things. we're going to have 180 million people that are so happy with their private healthcare, they're going to lose it under this crazy plan that these people are proposing. so, you will have a crash like you've never seen before, and i've been very good at predicting these things. yeah, please, go ahead. >> thank you, mr. president. you just mentioned president putin and the possibility of inviting him because he's important. your own intelligence has said that russia is now meddling in the election. have you raised that directly with putin ever? >> they said china, russia, iran, and probably others. but because of the fake news, they seem to think russia plays
3:43 pm
the best, so what they do -- it's all right. well, i'm just saying the way the politicians -- look, the other day they said the three countries. they said china and russia and iran, and some reporter got up and said, russia is meddling and i said, well, didn't it mention china and iran? why didn't you mention them too? so i don't know. you know what i'm telling you, i'll tell you who's meddling in our elections. the democrats are meddling by wanting and insisting on sending mail-in ballots where there's corruption all over the place. if you check what happened in new york, a relatively small race, with carolyn maloney and they called her the winner the other day because i was mentioning it at conferences and getting a lot of action on that statement, so they called her, they declared her the winner, and they have no idea who won, and the person, her opponent, is very angry, but they had mail-in voting, and they had hundreds and i think even thousands of ballots that are missing, that were fraudulent.
3:44 pm
take a look at the carolyn maloney race. take a look at patterson, new jersey. take a look now at this one in virginia where they mailed out 500,000 applications and they're going to people that aren't supposed to be get an application. yeah, please, go ahead. >> thank you, sir. secretary pompeo is heading to europe again this week. >> right. >> do you have any updates on when the travel restrictions to the eu are going to be lifted? seems strange we're offering exemptions for professional athletes but not visa holders. >> we try to do the best we can. you have big sporting events and that's good for our economy. that's good for us, and they do talk about certain exemptions, and they make sure everyone's perfectly tested and everyone comes in 100%. but you know, we do make certain accommodations but a you do have star athletes and that means a good thing for the country. that's economic development, et cetera. but we are working very closely with europe and with other countries to see what's the best
3:45 pm
timing. i was the one that turned europe off because they really -- they led the way. they led it much more so than we did. we were months following them. and in terms of they got hit earlier than we did, quite a bit earlier than we did, so i put the restrictions on europe. i put the restrictions on china, which was a great thing to do in retrospect. i mean, that was a very important day. dr. fauci said that was one of the most important days and a lot of people didn't want me to do it but we first put a ban on anybody from china coming in and then we put a ban on europe coming in. but we're working very closely with europe to see when that will all come off. yeah, please. >> it's 160,000 people have died on president obama's watch, do you think you would have called for his resignation? >> no, i wouldn't have done that. i think it's -- i think it's been amazing what we've been able to do. if we didn't close up our country, we would have had 1.5
3:46 pm
or 2 million people already dead. we've called it right. now we don't have to close it. we understand the disease. nobody understood it because nobody's ever seen anything like this. the closest thing is in 1917, they say, right? the great pandemic, certainly was a terrible thing, where they lost anywhere from 50 to 100 million people. probably ended the second world war, all the soldiers were sick. it was a -- that was a terrible situation, and this is highly contagious. this one is highly, highly contagious. no, if i would have listened to a lot of people, we would have kept it open, and by the way, we keep it open now all the way. we keep it open. but we would have kept it open and you could be up to 1.5 or 2 million people right now. 1.5 to 2 million people. our people have done a fantastic job. our consultants and our doctors and, you know, with disagreements and with a lot of things happening, what we've
3:47 pm
done with ventilators has been amazing. what we've done with medical equipment has been incredible. we've supplied the governors. nobody, not one person in this country that needed a ventilator didn't get it, and you know, at the beginning, there was a big shortage of ventilators. nobody had stockpiles or anything comparable to what you had to have. so, we would have lost -- if you think about it, you had mentioned 160,000 people. multiply that times ten right now. i think it would have been unsustainable and unacceptable, but that's what would have happened had we kept it open. so, no, i think we're a very large country. we are -- and i said skpiy it a time. a lot of people like to leave that out. one person is too many. it should have never happened. but they've done a really an extraordinary job. they'll never be given the credit, and i'm not talking about me. the people that have worked on this so hard will never be given the credit but they've done an extraordinary job with a very
3:48 pm
large, diverse country. brilliant, extraordinary job. and a lot of the governors, who, as you know, they sort of do the micro in their states, and they go up and i think i can tell you that a lot of the governors have done an extraordinary job, too. yeah, please, go ahead. >> thank you. did you ask the u.s. ambassador in brazil to focus his efforts in eliminating ethanol tariffs in brazil? did you ask the ambassador to lower, eliminate ethanol tariffs in brazil? >> we haven't really discussed that too much. but at some point, we probably will be, and is we don't want people tariffing us, and if they tariff us, although, i must tell you, i have a very good relationship with president bolsonaro. he's great. and i hear he's doing well. he's recovered from having covid, having covid-19, as they say, and that's great, and send him my regards. i think that as far as brazil is concerned, if they do tariffs, we have to have an equalization
3:49 pm
of tariffs, and we -- we are going to be presenting something having to do with tariffs and fairness and tariffs because we have many countries for many years that have been charging us tariffs to do business and we don't charge them, and it's called reciprocity. it's called reciprocal tariffs, and you may be seeing something on that very soon. did you have one? >> coronavirus, mr. president? >> please. >> thank you, plmr. president. thank you for coming back to finish the briefing. so, i have an opinion question for you. >> okay. >> joe biden is set to announce his running mate at any time now. we expect him to announce her. many of your supporters feel that the reason that obama's former nsa, susan rice, is at the top of biden's list is that she confessed to cover up a lot of the obamagate surveillance crimes that had taken place during your campaign.
3:50 pm
what are your thoughts? what is your opinion? do you subscribe to that line of thought? how do you feel about it? >> well, look, >> the obama campaign spied on our campaign and they've been caught. now let's see what happens to them. they have been caught. they've been caught red handed. it is probably treason. it's a horrible thing they did. it probably never happened before. at least nobody got caught doing it. but they used the intelligence agencies of our country to spy on my campaign and they've been caught. there are a lot of people involved. i don't want to say how much she's involved, frankly, if he chooses her that's fine, but that is a potential liability. we'll see. but president obama knew about it. joe biden knew about it. comey knew about it. brennan, clapper, the whole group.
3:51 pm
they all knew about it. lisa page and her lover struck. they all knew about it. we have it documented. we have it in texts. we have it in all sorts of forms. they knew about it. it was a terrible thing. it should never have happened and never be allowed to happen again to a president. this should never happen again. this was a setup like we've never seen. i think it's the political crime of the century and they've been caught. so let's see what happens to them all. thank you very much. thank you. >> and the president just wrapped up a press conference there in the white house briefing room that was briefly interrupted at the onset of the briefing when u.s. secret service came in and whisked the president out of the briefing room. there was a shooting at lafayette park, 17th street and pennsylvania avenue. an officer involved shooting according to the u.s. secret service. that situation was resolved. then the president resumed his press briefing per usual the
3:52 pm
press briefing was filled with all sorts of statements and we want to get to that. we'll talk about that in a moment. he was talking about the russia investigation and was again spreading these conspiracy theories that he was the target of some kind of conspiracy hatched by the obama administration to spy on his campaign. of course none of that has been proven. first we want to talk about what happened outside the white house grounds with this officer involved shooting. i want to go to jeremy diamond first standing by on the phone with us. jeremy, tell us what you know. >> well, it was a pretty chaotic situation here at the white house. our photo journalist actually heard one gunshot being fired and then moments later i was inside the white house and we saw the president being ushered out of the briefing room by a secret service agent. it appears the secret service agent simply said, step outside, sir. we're just going to have to step outside. the president was then gone from the briefing room for about
3:53 pm
8 1/2 minutes. he was not taken, though, to the bunker as he was when there were protests at lafayette park. i asked the president that directly after he came back into the briefing room. he said, no. we were just taken just out to the oval office. that is what the president said. the president also provided some details at least what he was able to convey in the immediacy of the shooting, saying there was a shooting, that it appears the person was shot by the secret service, that the suspect appeared to have been armed. but the president insisting that the situation was very well under control. and the president was asked if he was rattled at all by this. he said i don't know. do i seem rattled? but then obviously, jim, as you saw, the president then continued on with this briefing, taking questions on a wide range of newsday topics and certainly carried on as if nothing had
3:54 pm
happened earlier. jim? >> that's right, jeremy diamond. we can obviously tick through many of the things the president said during the briefing. several comments that the president made just don't hold up in terms of the facts. but we'll get to that in just a moment. first to brian todd. what can you tell us? >> well, jim, we're down here on 17th street and "h" street about a block away from the intersection where the shooting occurred we're told. our photo journalist can zoom in down the block. what you're seeing at the end of this block is the intersection of 17th street northwest and pennsylvania avenue. again, where the shooting occurred from what we're told. on the left side of your screen on the east side of 17th street you'll be seeing uniformed secret service officers. on the west side of 17th on the right side of your screen you'll be seeing uniformed metropolitan police officers from washington, d.c., a very heavy law enforcement presence here, combined force responding to this incident. they have cordoned off, blocked
3:55 pm
off streets for blocks in several directions. i had to walk several blocks just to get here from where i had to park my car. a couple of other nuggets of information we can tell you, a senior administration official confirming to our dana bash that there was an active shooter but that the shooter is in custody. i thought president trump also said something that was revealing there during the briefing. he said that he did not believe that the actual grounds of the white house were actually breached during the shooting. that is from president trump. we'll be getting more information on that later. i can again step out of the shot and let bill train his lens down the street here. you can see a very, very heavy police presence down there at the scene of the shooting. 17th and pennsylvania avenue. northwest. of course we've had numerous security incidents at that gate, near that gate to the white house over the years. several fence jumpers. you had people driving cars into barricades and you have had the occasional shooting. the secret service according to all accounts responded very, very quickly. the secret service did tweet out
3:56 pm
a very short time ago confirming that there was an officer involved shooting and that there are units of course on the scene here, jim. but again, you can see a very, very heavy police presence here and probably will be for some hours ahead. >> all right. thanks, brian todd. joining me now is a cnn law enforcement analyst and former secret service agent. jonathan, based on what you know so far, what we've seen, what do you make of the situation down there by the white house as brian was saying these things happen from time to time and it does seem as though the u.s. secret service swarmed into the situation and brought it under control. >> yep. absolutely. what happened here as you saw the secret service presented with a threat. they acted very swiftly within their rules of engagement on the street. internally on the white house complex the supervisor that was in charge of the president at that moment, that is an individual that i had worked with in the past both in new york and on the detail. one of the best agents possible to have standing next to the president in a moment of crisis.
3:57 pm
everyone did exactly what they were trained to do. the president was never in any harm and to ensure that he was moved to a safe location. the uniformed division officers on the street put the threat down and, also, maintained public safety. i mean, if you think about how congested that area of washington, d.c. is, to be able to engage in a gun fight when there is this threat presented and not harm the public, that speaks to the training of that uniformed division officer at that moment in time. >> all right. our hats off to the secret service there for bringing that situation under control. tough jobs they have down there keeping the white house and the grounds safe. >> they did a great job today. >> indeed it does appear to be the case. thank you so much. i want to bring in gloria borger to talk about the substance of the briefing we just heard from the president a few moments ago. i can tick through a couple of things and then, gloria, tell me what you heard. one of the things we need to go over is the president is talking about how he is going to sign this executive order stating pre-existing conditions will be
3:58 pm
covered by insurance companies in this country and one of the things we need to point out is that pre-existing conditions are already supposed to be covered by insurance companies because of the affordable care act a.k.a. obama care. the president was saying at one point he wants a, quote, double safety net. you don't need a double safety net when obama care is already the law of the land. the other thing to point out, and perhaps you'll want to talk about this, the president at one point saying democrats are meddling in the 2020 election. that was one of several things you could probably tick off a whole list of things the president said that are just conspiracy theories he is throwing out there with no evidence behind it. what jumped out at you, gloria? >> well, also on the pre-existing conditions thing, don't forget that this administration has been fighting that in court. >> right. >> so when he talks about a double safety net it is protecting americans from whom if it is already the law of the land which they're fighting? the other things that sort of struck me, and again, it seems
3:59 pm
to me to have this feeling of throwing everything up against the wall to see what will stick. we saw this in 2016 and it obviously worked to a degree talking about a capital gains tax cut right now in the middle of an economy that is desperately suffering and in recession. he talked about income tax cuts for the middle class which if you'll recall he talked about in 2016 as well. and remember, he has also said in the past he is going to come out with some big health care plan. i don't know whether that's what he was talking about today or not. so we all -- we ought to say and just step back for a moment and say that all of these things that he is talking about, capital gains tax cut, middle class tax cut, are not going to happen before the election. they have to go to congress. >> that's right. this is something the president just did just now, circumventing
4:00 pm
congress, putting out his own executive actions instead of working with congress. on the coronavirus we need to point out at one point he said we have a rapid increase only in cases. we have a rapid increase in deaths as well. thanks for breaking that down. thanks very much for watching. a fast paced hour. more with erin burnett "outfront" starts right now. outfront next the united states passing 5 million coronavirus cases as president trump says tonight, we're about to be in very, very good shape all over the country. plus nearly 500 students quarantined near atlanta after a school outbreak. you see the school. we're going to talk to a doctor about why he is sending his child back to school. and republican governor john kasich speaking next week at the dnc. what will his message be? he is my guest. let's go "outfront." good evening. i'm erin burnett "outfront" tonight the breaking news. president trump says the secret service was involved in a

107 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on