tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC March 12, 2020 11:00pm-12:00am PDT
since 1987. a crushing blow to americans' retirement savings while questions linger over the lag in testing. plus, a member of canada's first family tests positive for the virus. disneyland will shut its doors decades. the college basketball tradition of march madness called off. major league baseball and the nhl postponing their seasons. and congress works to find a way to stem the economic pain and sustain the many people who fear lost income while presidential candidates offer their vision. how will the virus impact voting? "the 11th hour" gets under way on this thursday night. good evening once again tonight from our nbc news headquarters in chicago. i'm ali velshi in for brian williams. it's day 1,148 of the trump administration. 236 days to go until the 2020 presidential election. as this country now grapples
with the concerns over coronavirus, there are many more stark signs of the outbreak's deepening impact. wall street witnessed yet another meltdown, the worst day there since 1987. despite the federal reserve promising to inject at least $1.5 trillion worth of money into the financial system, the dow sank 10%. for the second time this week, the rapid stock sell-off triggered a halt in trading. yet even as today's markets were in free fall, the president was sounding optimistic about the financial future. >> we have a lot of things that we're working on with the financial markets, and it's going to work out fine. we're -- you have to remember the stock market as an example is still much higher than when i got here, and it's taken a big hit. but it's going to all bounce back, and it's going to bounce back very big at the right time. >> going to bounce back very big at the right time. tonight trump's former director of the national economic council offered up his assessment.
>> we are in a recession right now. we are having negative growth right now, and the market is pricing in that uncertainty. the good news is we did start from a very strong position just three weeks ago. >> efforts in congress to ease the vast economic impact of the coronavirus continue. tonight house democrats said they are close to a deal with the trump administration on an emergency aid package for those affected by the outbreak. nancy pelosi and treasury secretary steve mnuchin have been negotiating all day. we know of at least eight phone calls between them today alone. tonight pelosi says they hope to reach a final agreement tomorrow. in a letter to democrats tonight, the speaker said the bill would provide free testing for those in need, emergency leave, and two weeks of paid sick leave, enhanced unemployment insurance and food programs, and more money for medicaid. in the meantime, the number of u.s. coronavirus cases in this country continues to climb. there are well over 1,600 confirmed cases here now and at least 41 deaths.
and the number of closures and cancellations across the nation is also quickly rising. disney and universal, msnbc's parent company, are shutting down theme parks. college basketball's march madness is canceled. pro hockey's season is suspended until further notice. and the mlb is delaying the start of the baseball season. and just a short time ago, news that canadian prime minister justin trudeau's wife has tested positive for the new coronavirus. trudeau, who spoke with president trump today about the outbreak, is now under self-quarantine as his wife recovers. during last night's primetime address trump rolled out a travel ban from europe scheduled to take effect in just over 24 hours. tonight "the washington post" reports the president realized today that his speech last night did little to calm fears about coronavirus. quote, trump, who believed that by giving the speech he would appear in command and that his remarks would reassure financial markets and the country, was in an unusually foul mood and
sounded at times apoplectic on thursday as he watched stocks tumble and digested widespread criticism of his speech. today at the white house, trump defended his decision while also seeming to open the door to limits on travel within the u.s. >> a lot of people went from china into europe. europe suffered tremendously. you see what's going on. and so i just wanted that to stop as it pertains to the united states, and that's what we've done. >> have you considered traveled restrictions within the united states? such as to washington state or california? >> we haven't discussed that yet. is it a possibility? yes, if somebody gets out of control, if an area gets out of control. i don't want people dying. that's what i'm all about. >> one of the main obstacles to fighting the outbreak continues to be a lack of testing. today dr. anthony fauci, the director of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases was very candid when he spoke to congress about the testing shortage.
>> the system does not -- is not really geared to what we need right now, what you are asking for. that is a failing. >> a failing, yes. >> it is a failing. let's admit it. >> okay. >> the idea of anybody getting it easily the way people in other countries are dog it, we're not set up for that. do i think we should be? yes, but we're not. >> down the street at the white house, the president had a very different take on testing. >> they have a million tests out now. over the next few days, they're going to have 4 million tests out, and frankly the testing has been going very smooth. millions are being produced. there's a brand-new thing that just happened, but millions are being produced. >> today, even some republican lawmakers were fact-checking the president. >> that's obviously the goal is to be able to get testing for everybody who wants testing to be able to get it and to be able
to get it in multiple locations, but that's not accurate right now. >> [ inaudible question ] >> people should not say if you want a test, you can go get a test right now. >> amid all of this, it appears donald trump has had another close brush with coronavirus. the press secretary for the brazilian president, who reportedly has now tested positive for the virus, dined with the president in mar-a-lago this past weekend. senator lindsey graham was there too. his office has announced he's in self-quarantine. today the white house issued a statement that said in part, both the president and vice president had almost no interactions with the individual who tested positive and do not require being tested at this time. and today trump seemed unworried. >> we did nothing very unusual. we sat next to each other for a period of time, had a great conversation. let's put it this way. i'm not concerned. >> all right. our leadoff discussion will begin in just a moment, but first i'm joined by alan blinder, professor of economics and public affairs at princeton
and former vice chairman of the federal reserve, who served on president bill clinton's council of economic advisers. alan, it's a rare occasion to talk to you, but this is a serious one. here's the issue. the fed cut interest rates last week. today it introduced money into the financial system, but we're not solving for a financial problem right now. >> that's exactly right. if you think back to 2008 or back to 1998, we had a financial problem on our hands, and certainly in 2008, that financial problem was having dire effects on the real economy. this is not like that at all. this is the -- this is going the other direction. we have terrible things going on in the real economy, and the financial markets are reacting to that, and they know, as you know, that the fed can't do anything about that, about what's going on with the virus, about what's going on in the short term with the real economy.
people that are worried about liquidity here and there, the fed can fix that and well. it may take a lot of money, but the fed knows how to do that. but that's really not even secondary to this. it's tertiary at best. >> so there is a role perhaps at some point as this crisis spreads for the federal reserve, but right now it does appear that they're trying to solve a problem they can't solve, and we've got futures tomorrow morning looking like another bad day. i mean these are times that, alan, we have not seen for a long time, even before your time in the clinton administration, these kind of heavy losses on a sustained basis. >> no, absolutely. well, we've seen these in the 2008-'09 crisis for reasons that were horrible and complicated but kind of understandable. but this is a beast of a completely different nature, and what you've seen when the fed cut interest rates and what you've seen with its liquidity announcements, today the markets look at that, and they may get happy for ten minutes.
then they realize this is not going to really solve the problem -- never mind solve. this is not going to seriously ameliorate the problem. >> alan, thank you for your time as always. alan blinder joining us from princeton. here for our leadoff discussion on a thursday night, my colleague stephanie ruhle, a veteran of the investment banking and business world, the host of the 9:00 a.m. hour here on msnbc. nbc business correspondent susan page, washington bureau chief for "usa today." and peter baker, chief white house correspondent for "the new york times." susan, let met start with you. the president really thought about 24 hours ago, it seemed, that he was going to deliver a speech and a speech from the white house, from the oval office is a serious matter and it would calm markets. through the course of his speech we already saw futures dropping. the investors around the world, people who have choices about what they're doing with their money, do not think the white house has a firm hand on the tiller right now. >> yes, that's right.
this is the kind of address we've seen presidents previously make at times of crisis or turmoil. after the oklahoma city bombing or after the 9/11 attacks, we've seen presidents very effectively use an oval office address to the nation to keep people calm, to provide a sense that they're in charge, that there's a path ahead. but those are reassurances that president trump did not manage to convey last night and instead i think raised more questions than he answered. i've got to say of the six presidents i've covered, i've never seen a president read a speech off a teleprompter and immediately have to have aides come out and offer factual corrections to what he said. that really does raise questions about what's happening at the white house and the competency of the leadership there. >> peter, you and maggie haberman have filed a story this evening in which you talk about the fact that what it seems the world and certainly americans wanted or needed or continued to need from the white house is some degree of direction, some
unified roadmap to follow forward. and in the absence of that, people are making their own rules, whether those be investors or governors or mayors or school districts or sports organizations. >> yeah, it's rather striking. the president of course has been pretty assertive on the issue of closing borders, right? that's an area he's familiar with. it's an area that's sort of dominated in some ways his three years in office. he's restricted travel from china, from iran, and now as of tomorrow night, from europe. but the area he has not really asserted himself and provided direction to the country is inside our borders. what do we do with schools? what do we do with universities? broadway, disney world, the nhl, the mlb, all of these guys are making their decisions on their own without the guidance of the commander in chief from washington. it took anthony fauci, the scientist you just showed on air, to say yesterday at a congressional hearing, yeah, maybe the nba should think about suspending games. we shouldn't have these large gatherings.
and within 24 hours of him saying that, you saw all of the professional sports essentially react in a very strong way. the president himself didn't say that last night. he didn't give any direction on what he thinks people should do beyond washing their hands and keeping vulnerable populations, you know, isolated. so i think that's an unusual situation. maybe he will turn that around. he's talking about a national emergency. he's talking about using emergency powers. but so far he's left it to the country to decide for itself, and the result is much of american life has been closed down. >> stephanie ruhle, you and i have many times said that the stock market is not a proxy for the economy because of the number of people who are not invested in it. but when you see 20%, 25% losses on the stock market over a two-week period or three-week period, it becomes a bit of a proxy for the fear that the world is fearing. sure, about half of americans are invested in the stock market in one way or the other, but lots of americans work for public companies and at this
point this feels like the slow, grinding shutdown of an economy that is really making people fear for their futures. >> it does, and i mean i'm in agreement with former economic adviser to the president gary cohn. we're absolutely slipping into a recession. but i want to give you a sliver -- you know, a bit of a silver lining here. what we have seen in the last 24 hours is a really scary tipping point. peter just went through whether you're talking mlb, nhl, the nba, the college and university closings, across the board. what has happened, as we more from corporate america, less from the government, are truly getting our heads around assessing and addressing the risk of corona, everyday americans are now having to change how we live our lives in order to address this. and at least in the short term, we are going to self-quarantine. we are going to hunker down. and when we do that, we're not spending.
and when we're not spending, we're not contributing to the economy, and that turns markets in the red. now, the sooner we do that and that has become today for more and more americans, the sooner we get to the other side, and that is the bright spot. so as alan blinder said, this is very different from 2008 where you had a disastrous underlying economy. that's not where we are today. we're facing a disastrous natural disaster that was not done by bad risk-taking from banks or bad decisions from executives in the auto industry. and the sooner we get to the other side of this mountain where china has started to get and south korea has started to get and maybe italy soon, we're actually going to get back to normalcy. so as scary as it is -- and you're absolutely right. it's like a falling knife, the market right now. the fact that at least we're tackling it, there's a lot of sophisticated investors out there that are saying we're taking our medicine and after this we're going to get better. >> susan, there is a consequence
to the president continuing to talk about how it's the media that is providing a narrative that is not honest about this, and the president's got a lot of supporters in right-wing media who are doing this. you've done a poll. there was a u.s. today/ipsos poll in which you polled people who identified as republicans and democrats about a basic thing like washing their hands to prevent coronavirus. the result was actually different depending on your political party. >> you know, i was looking at the cross tabs on the question of are you washing your hands more often because i thought men and women would be different on that by the way. no offense to men. and i found a small gap on gender, but a huge gap on partisanship. by more than -- by double digits, democrats were more likely to be washing their hands more often than republicans. and i don't know exactly why that's the case but i think it may be the effect of the president's bully pulpit, that republicans trust him when he tells people it's not so serious, we're going to get better, it's being overblown. they believe it, and they don't take these common sense measures
like washing their hands. democrats don't believe the president. they believe tony fauci and public health officials that say wash your hands as much as you can. so they're taking heed of that. that just shows you perhaps in a small and quirky way kind of the power that the president has to lead on an issue like this or to make things more difficult for the country. >> i don't know, but ali, i would say, how humiliating for the president. who does he want the approval of more than anything? the ceo set, the most powerful men in america. and what do they do? ignoring what he is saying, calling the coronavirus a hoax, trying to downplay it. and on the other side, they are taking extreme borderline, draconian measures to address it. so one could say, yes, the president looks so powerful among his republican base, but that's not actually who he seeks, who he desperately seeks the approval from, and that's the most powerful ceos out there. and they certainly don't agree with him. >> peter baker, whom i know to
be a hand washer, peter, the president has directed jared kushner to take some sort of leadership role in this. but ultimately as you heard alan blinder say moments ago, this is not a financial crisis. this is a public health issue. the administration -- or at least donald trump and it seems jared kushner according to reporting shares this view, that this is actually a public psychology issue as opposed to an actual public health crisis. >> it could be both. public spirit and public mood plays a role. we are having the first pandemic really of the social media era, right? it was 2009 we had the h1n1 virus, but we didn't have the prevalence that we do today of twitter and facebook, and they didn't play such a large role in our life, in which all the information that we're getting these days doesn't just come from television. it doesn't just come from the president of the united states. it comes from our friends and our neighbors and our colleagues, all of whom are scared. and this fear has no doubt caused a greater reaction than
might have been seen in history's other pandemics. now, the question is what the president does in that kind of climate. does he reassure the country, or does he look like he's out of touch? and there's a fine balance between being confident and projecting optimism, and looking like you're not taking it seriously enough. for the president right now, a lot of his critics think he looks like he hasn't been taking it serious enough. jared kushner is part of the debate in this white house and there are people like that who think like the president, that really there has been an overreaction, that it is about politics, that it's the media or the democrats trying to damage him. there's another set in the white house, the public health oriented people who are worried and think the government should be doing more. we'll see how that debate plays out in the days to come. >> thank you to the three of you help pg us out to kick off this discussion. coming up, health care workers are sounding the alarms about a potential shortage of critical medical supplies, basics like surgical masks and beds. an update on hospital preparations just ahead.
now you can. because xfinity mobile gives you more flexible data. you can choose to share data between lines, mix with unlimited, or switch it up at any time. all on the most reliable wireless network. which means you can save money without compromising on coverage. get more flexible data, the most reliable network, and more savings. plus, get $300 off when you buy a new samsung galaxy s20 ultra. that's simple. easy. awesome. call, click or visit a store today.
the coronavirus does not have a political affiliation, will affect republicans, democrats and independents alike. it will not discriminate based on national origin, race, gender or zip code. it will touch people in positions of power as well as the most vulnerable in our society. >> "the new york times" is reporting that hospitals in the united states are growing
anxious as coronavirus continues to spread. "the times" reports, quote, with the bow wave of coronavirus infections still to come, hospitals across the country are trying to prepare for a flood of critically ill patient whose will strain their capacities like nothing they have seen in at least a generation. even with some time to prepare, administrators fear they will not be ready, end quote. back with us again tonight, dr. irwin redlener, the director of columbia's national center for disaster preparedness with an expertise in pandemic influenza. he's now part of the biden campaign's special coronavirus committee. irwin, good to see you again. unfortunately every time you and i talk, bad things are happening. a lot of people have probably seen this in the media or on social media, this curve of demand for health care services, and it can go one of two ways. it can spike and exceed our capacity to provide people with
the necessary care, or something can happen that is called flattening the curve. in other words, the same number of people might get infected but it will happen in a way that we can management. >> over a longer period of time, >> right. >> so, this is the third wave of very serious concerns about what the government is doing and not doing, starting of course with all these failures that continue, by the way, with our ability to test for the coronavirus. that was one. and the second thing is the messaging issues, which i would like to come back to. but in terms of the hospital issues, you know, let's take a couple numbers for a minute, ali. so we're dealing with -- we currently have between 90,000 and 100,000 intensive care beds in the entire united states, and they're almost all full all the time. if we had a kind of a moderate to severe peak of coronavirus infections around the country, we might need double -- double -- that number of intensive care beds with everything that goes with it including mechanical
ventilators, staffing properly these beds and these units. and we are extremely far from being remotely close to real preparedness for any of this deluge that could be a reality. and actually in a matter of a few weeks given the rate of replication and spread of the virus. we only have to look at italy to see what a worse case scenario is. and a few weeks ago they were in not much different a situation than we are now. we have a lot to worry about and not much done to this point. >> tell me what it looks like. in other words, if we exceed our capacity, if we have 100,000 beds and we need 150,000 or 200,000, what does that look like versus doing it in a more orderly fashion because not everybody dies from this. >> no. >> we're very familiar with the flu, so we know when you're supposed to go with a doctor and when you're not. but we don't know with this. so, there are a whole bunch of people who won't be sick but may be using medical care, but maybe we want that so they don't infect people who could die.
>> we have a lot of people who are sick but with mild or moderate symptoms. there's no question about that. but whatever modeling assumptions, you make, there are going to be a lot more people who are going to need hospital beds and intensive care unit beds and ventilators and all that sort of thing. the problem with that is we're not prepared for even that. but the second part of this equation that we haven't been talking about enough is it also crowds out our ability to take care of regular people without coronavirus, who have had a stroke or a heart attack or some trauma where they need hospital care. and we're not going to have the room to handle the surge of coronavirus patients in addition to the normal surge of everyday living that has kept our hospital beds completely full. >> right. so if you have some other underlying illness, you want to be able to know that you can get treatment for that and this will occupy those beds. >> exactly. so this is what we're facing is really a kind of coming winter here, or however that "game of
thrones" expression was. but we're heading there almost inevitably to some sort of significant surge in command on hospitals. and we haven't put enough money or time into thinking about how we're going to deal with this. after all, there's no local community, big city, small city, medium-size city that has the capacity to expand in the way that i'm talking about without a significant amount of federal assistance. and it's not forthcoming, and it's kind of the next wrung of incompetencies that we're seeing from the federal government, which is a failure to really help the local communities get ready for what's undoubtedly going to be a major surge in demand on our hospitals. >> so, irwin, this is your specialty as mine is economics. and i look at this market. the worst day in my career that i've ever covered in terms of a market loss, and yet i was talking to alan blinder a few minutes ago, and he said, this isn't a financial problem. this is not actually a problem that is solved in the financial markets. >> sure. >> it's solved -- you hinted at this.
it's solved by messaging, that we're in command here. earlier on lawrence's show, sarah nelson, the flight attendant, described how flight attendants are trained to keep passengers calm. when they think something is going bad on a flight. the messaging is crucial here. the psychology is important in addition to public health. >> ali, here's the thing about that. for many weeks i was saying as much as i could, we have to find that sweet spot between complacency and panic, and especially we have to see that coming from the president, which of course we see zero evidence of. but even i was saying, yeah, we can't panic people, and we should not be panicking people. but in a certain way i would like to panic our hospital systems and the people that support those systems. they need to be up and running full speed ahead. now, i should also note that the public is actually doing very, very well. they're complying with a lot of the regular hygiene rules that we're imposing. it's really -- it's been amazing. people are accepting this without panic, but i just want to rev up our other entities that involve the care of actual patients.
the other thing i would say is that i'm very concerned about the lack of leadership from the white house about this fact, which is that we're leaving the governors and mayors up to their own devices and imaginations to say, oh, we're going to stop anything over 250 people at a major event. other cities will say 500. there's zero scientific evidence for any of these arbitrary numbers, and it's pretty desperate at this point, and they have to get their act together. >> but absent leadership, we're all making our own decisions, right? that's why some people are selling their stocks, because they don't know what right looks like. irwin, thank you again. >> sure. >> i know you're on our air a lot, and we rely on you. thank you. coming up, the roadblocks getting in the way of testing those who need it. - i've been pretty stable with
my schizophrenia for a while, and then my kids asked me why my body was rocking back and forth. my doctor said i have tardive dyskinesia, which may be related to important medications i take for my schizophrenia. i also felt my tongue darting and pushing against my cheeks. i was worried what others would think. td can affect different parts of the body, and it may also affect people who take medications for depression and bipolar disorder. i know i shouldn't change or stop my medication so i was relieved there are treatment options for td. - if this sounds like you or someone you know, visit talkabouttd.com to sign up to receive a personalized doctor discussion guide to help start a conversation with you doctor about td. you'll also be able to access videos and a free brochure
testing now is not going to tell you how many cases you're going to have. >> mm-hmm. >> what will tell you what you're going to have will be how you respond to it with containment and mitigation. >> okay. >> the idea of anybody getting it easily the way people in other country are doing it, we're not set up for that. do i think we should be? yes, but we're not. >> according to the cdc, only 11,000 coronavirus tests have been conducted so far, prompting fears that the u.s. health care system could soon become overwhelmed. our next guest has this reporting tonight, quote, many private laboratories in the united states still aren't able
to conduct their own tests in part because of a demanding government approval process. the delays of prolonged waiting times to diagnose infected patients while the virus has spread further. joining us for more, nbc news national reporter suzy khimm. suzy, officials first heard about this in december. by january, coronavirus was actually a thing. by february, it was full blown in china, and in almost the middle of march, you and i are discussing why we don't have enough testing capability in america. it is inconceivable that we're even having this conversation. >> we are weeks and weeks, if not months behind where we should be right now, and basically what's happening, as you're seeing, is that both public and private laboratories are racing to catch up. unfortunately, there have been many roadblocks along the way, some of which have been lifted and some of which still exist. i think that's why you are still hearing and seeing complaints
from ordinary people who might be feeling sick, who might believe that they might have the virus from doctor who's have expressed frustration that they haven't been able to get enough patients tested. so while there has been progress made, there still is a lot of work to do here. and the government's slow response to this and the missteps they've made along the way haven't been helping. >> suzy, what's the solution? is it the cdc sending out more test kits? is it hospitals? is it lowering the threshold for which you can get tested? is it private labs which you have written about? what does success look like here? >> so there are a number of different obstacles that are holding up testing right now. so in recent -- in the last week, you've seen two major testing companies, labcorp, and quest which many americans may be familiar with from their doctors' office. they have started broad scale commercial testing that you should be able to get. many medical providers offices. but they can't just turn a
switch and start testing it at absolute maximum capacity overnight. they need equipment, staff, time to ramp up. quest told us it would take up to six weeks for them to be able to do tens of thousands of tests a week. so that's one problem. another problem is just lack of basic lab materials and personal protective equipment for the lab technicians doing the test. i spoke with one major provider, a medical provider that runs 26 sites across the country, and they say that they basically had a lot of trouble finding basic equipment just to protect their lab staff to do enough tests in their facilities. so there are many different obstacles that are still in place even after the government has changed some of its policies and finally did let private labs begin to develop their own tests. but that only happened at the very end of february, and now we're in middle of march, and it's clear that this is still a major problem in terms of access to testing. >> suzy, thank you for your reporting on this. we appreciate it. coming up, in the midst of a
the election will proceed forward on tuesday. i'm encouraging all local election authorities to expand the hours of early voting every day until election day. >> there's ample opportunity to kind of spread this out as far as the number of people who are, you know, in line at one time. so we do not anticipate any major problems on election day on tuesday. >> while schools and businesses across the country are closing their doors because of coronavirus concerns, state officials say they're moving ahead with tuesday's democratic primaries. polls in arizona, florida, illinois, and ohio are still scheduled to be open. officials there have urged residents to opt for early voting or mail-in ballots to lower the number of people gathered in one place on election day. illinois and ohio are scrambling to move polling places away from
vulnerable senior centers. as for the two leading democratic candidates, both have canceled their campaign events ahead of the primaries. for more, we welcome to the broadcast, mary ann ahern. and back with us again, charlotte alter, a national correspondent for "time" and author of the new book "the ones we've been waiting for." correspondent for time. charlotte, you've been reporting on the changes to the campaign. people are going to have to think about this more holistically because we don't know how long this goes on for. certainly in the coming week there have been major changes to the way the campaigns and candidates are approaching the voting. >> yeah. sanders and biden have both canceled major rallies. we're already seeing both candidates begin to do some kind of like elbow bumping instead of -- instead of hand-shaking. but, listen, both top democratic candidates at this point are exactly in the vulnerable range, and they're constantly, you
know, under typical campaign circumstances, they're constantly surrounded by people. they're constantly shaking hands. they're constantly in big crowds, exactly what doctors are now telling people is, you know, the most dangerous type of situation for contracting coronavirus. so both campaigns have, you know, taken a step back from those types of events, and i think that they're both being very careful about how they proceed forward. >> mary ann, i live in new york city. we're actually relatively good at ignoring each other even in large crowds, but not in chicago. chicago cancelled the st. patrick's day parade. joe biden was going to be here on friday for an event. it's a different place. >> it is a different place, and no one throws a chicago st. patrick's day party. it is amazing, the marching, the politicians, going up and even giving a hug and a kiss, and they won't be able to do that this time. in chicago there's going to be a fantastic party -- there would have been on friday night. 1,200 people at the irish fellowship party that joe biden
wanted to just swing right through. >> right. >> instead there will be a virtual town hall tomorrow afternoon from chicago. >> wow. >> for the residents of chicago. >> charlotte, this is what the campaigns are doing. the states and the democratic party hosting these primaries, they've got to give some thought to how this all goes down. people are wondering, you go into a place and keep on pressing a button on a machine. do they have ways to think about -- they want to reduce the flow through these places, but that's against every fiber in an election organizer's body to reduce flow or cut back on crowds. >> exactly. they're in a really tough situation. i mean how do you drive people to the polls when we're in this situation where you don't want people to be congregating in large crowds. i do know some polling places are taking extra precautions around wiping down pens that they give people to fill out their ballots, making sure all the surfaces are sanitized. but i certainly think there's going to be a significant drop
in turnout, not just because of the crowds, but also just because some of the locations that polling has been happening in are these schools that have been shut down. so they need to move it to someplace place. and whenever you move a polling location, you get some drop-off. >> it gets complicated. people don't know it moved. they lose energy to do that. >> exactly. i also think it's important to remember two of the states that vote on tuesday are arizona and florida, and those are two states with very high aging populations. and so, you know, people who would be really, really vulnerable happen to be in these states that are voting on tuesday. >> the chicago board of elections still is trying to locate more than 90 polling locations that they have to move. >> they were in like senior places or schools. >> senior homes. they're still scrambling to find those. you show up on tuesday to vote and your polling place is not there. it is definitely going to be chaotic. >> you actually sent us a picture. your daughter was at a target in the area. was it around chicago? >> tonight. this afternoon.
>> look at this. looks at this picture. looks like a target that hasn't opened for business yet. >> there she was, my daughter codi, new mom. goes to buy new cleaning materials, and nothing left. nothing left on the shelves. >> that's incredible. charlotte, do you have a sense if everybody's got to follow the same rules, does it hurt anybody? >> i think both campaigns are taking this really seriously. i do think that just given the generational breakdown we've been seeing in some of the polling numbers, sanders is doing much better with younger voters and also much better with sort of -- he's got a super committed, extremely enthusiastic base. so it could be that this results in a sort of inadvertent boost for him just because maybe younger voters might be less scared to show up and, you know, his hard core fans wouldn't necessarily be deterred. but i know that the sanders campaign is taking this really seriously, and i don't think they take any joy in that.
i think that both campaigns want their candidates to be safe and also want the voters to be safe. >> yeah. >> so, you know, it's certainly going to be unpredictable and chaotic. >> local campaigns even have done this. >> i was going to say. there's down-ballot races here. in a place like illinois, that's a big deal. >> right. they have said, okay, on election night we will not be throwing our usual campaign parties as well as, of course, biden and sanders are doing the same. we're going to see empty rooms of people celebrating, which is just -- it's unbelievable. >> well, for us reporters, it's hard to get our head around. we're all going to have to adjust. i mean we judge things by the crowd and the frenzy and the energy in the room, and that's -- >> right. and we're not going to see the knocking on the doors on these final days. in chicago they have what's called palm cards. the ward boss gives out the list. okay. here's who you go in and you vote for. >> yeah. >> and it literally is the size of your palm. i already received one in the mail this time because i'm not sure they're going to be at the polling places.
they want to make sure you've got it. they want that list out there. but instead perhaps not as many germs if it's mailed to you instead. >> that is amazing. good to see you. thank you for joining us. >> thank you. >> mary ann ahern and charlotte alter, thank you for joining us. coming up, how an anxious nation craves credible leadership during times of crisis when "the 11th hour" continues. the all-new silverado hd adds to the legendary capability of the strongest, most advanced silverados ever. with best in class camera technology and larger, more functional beds than any competitor. the only truck that can compare to a silverado is another silverado. truck month is the right time to get behind the wheel of the chevy silverado. now, get 0% financing for 72 months plus $500 dollars cash allowance on all silverado 1500 crew cab pickups. find new roads at your local chevy dealer.
this is the most aggressive and comprehensive effort to confront a foreign virus in modern history. >> "the washington post" reports last night's oval office address from the president, quote, reflected not only his handling of the coronavirus crisis but in some ways much of his presidency. it was riddled with errors, nationalistic and xenophobic in tone, limited in its empathy and boastful of both his own decisions and the supremacy of the nation he leads.
back with us tonight, presidential historian and pulitzer prize-winning biographer jon meacham. his newest work, which is available now, is "the hope of glory: reflections on the last words of jesus from the cross." jon, it's not hard to find people who have no interest in the federal government, who don't think they rely on it, who don't trust the federal government increasingly more and more. and yet a point rachel made earlier, it is the organization, it is the institution on which we are relying for guidance right now, and you don't realize it's not there until you don't get the guidance you're looking for. >> exactly. it's the basic social contract that we've had really from the beginning. we had huge debates in the 1780s and 1790s through the civil war about the relative role of the federal government. but since 1933, we've had a basic sense in this country that the federal government had a genuine and ambient role to play in our lives.
and even the most conservative among us have accepted the notion that an institution like the federal government needs to be competent. it needs to be well-funded in order to respond to crises of fundamental order, and that's what this is. this is a crisis of order. it's not quite existential, but it's certainly closer to existential than any of us want it to be. >> but you bring an interesting point up because even if you are for limited government, even if you believe in small government, there are basic things we believe the federal government does that we would not do better on our own, and this is one of those things because in the absence of cogent leadership in this, people are making their own decisions, governors and mayors and businesses are making their own decisions about how they're going to deal with this. >> it goes back to the preamble of the constitution. this is basically about public safety. that phrase doesn't appear, but
the preamble, gouverneur morris, a peg-legged founder, wrote it, saying this is about the general welfare. and if this doesn't fall under the general welfare clause, if public health doesn't fall under that original phrase, then nothing does. >> what's the sense of the attack on government that we've seen for some decades now but it has intensified in the last couple of years where we talk about the deep state? we have built a situation for ourselves in which many americans, maybe many millions of americans, have deliberately learned to distrust government. >> this is a long-term trend. 1965 marked the high watermark in our polling history. something like 77% of americans trusted the federal government in 1965 to do the right thing some or most of the time. that's crashed by more than 60 points.
and part of what's happening here is president trump, without making this a partisan issue, this is an observation, it's a clinical observation. president trump is reaping what he has sowed. he has sowed distrust. he has sowed tribalism and a sense that he is the only person that his followers can believe. we know that not to be the case. the simple workings of reason tell us that that is an outlandish claim. and one of the fascinating things that's going to unfold here -- i don't think i've ever seen a presidential campaign turn as quickly as this one has in the past -- call it ten days, but certainly the past 72 hours. you had the challenger today appearing more presidential, more reassuring than the incumbent. and what that is, again, it's not a partisan point. it's an historical point because what americans want is a
president who at least will do as little harm as possible, right? i mean that's a very conservative idea. we just don't want him making things worse. and right now i think a lot of americans believe that the incumbent president is, in fact, making things worse, and they're hungry for leadership whether it's elective or appointive. we just want the facts. as governor michael dukakis put it unsuccessfully in 1988 running against george bush, this is not about ideology. it's about competence. the country disagreed then. i think in this case we would certainly agree with dukakis principle. >> is it your sense of the feedback the white house has received in the last 24 hours will change anything? >> i think it's -- the president has been impervious to changing data and circumstance. >> yeah. >> right? so he does what he wants to do, and whenever he gets into a
corner, he just keeps going in the sense of whatever it -- he carries on as he set out. he's shown no capacity to learn or change, and that's one of the tragedies of the era. >> jon, in the last ten days or so, you are the first person to invoke gouverneur morris, so i appreciate that. thank you for your time. that is our broadcast for tonight. good night from our nbc news bureau in chicago.
tonight on all in. >> wow, what a day. >> the worst drop ever in the history of the stock market, a state of emergency declared in new york city, major league baseball suspends declared many new york city. major league baseball suspends operation and mass school closures around the country. >> all public schools in maryland will be closed. >> the latest on how it stop the spread of virus. and what american workers should kbpt to get from congress. >> the deadline has passed. >> top public health expert admits the testing system a failure. how to carry on with the president lying to the nation. all in starts right now. good evening from new york. a lot is