Error data obtained from two different software development environments are compared. To obtain data that was complete, accurate, and meaningful, a goal-directed data collection methodology was used. Changes made to software were monitored concurrently with its development. Similarities common to both environments are included: (1) the principal error was in the design and implementation of single routines; (2) few errors were the result of changes, required more than one attempt to correct, and resulted in other errors; (3) relatively few errors took more than a day to correct.

plus-circle Add Review

comment

Reviews