your colleague tim ryan was just on told john berman maybe that's something to look at, but when we look at how this bill passed in the house without republican support, how confident are you that there could be republican support in the senate, even if this is broken down into smaller pieces? >> i'm not confident that there will be any republican support for it in the senate and that's the difficult part. now, we could do what some of us actually supported doing in the house, which was basically to focus on three or four significant provisions, one of them being as tim ryan said extension of the child tax credit, early pre-k but whatever we choose and live to fight another day, but that's a possibility but you know, the reason we were in the position of having to cut back the duration of some of this funding for certain elements of the plan was because joe manchin made us so he made us go from originally $3.5 trillion to half of that and we'll cut back the duration of the funding. now he complains about the fact we cut back on the duration of the funding. so again -- >> sorry. >> go ahe

kaine, to senator warnock and padilla and john tester. we have to find a way to get it on the floor. >> you grilled the head of instagram over the impact on young users and the devastating impact on young girls. now you're introducing legislation to require social media companies to publicly release internal data and to cooperate with independent researchers looking into their app's impact on the republican. senator rob portman cosponsored the bill. do you have the votes to pass it? >> i think we do. there's a bipartisan movement to take this on. the interests of parents right now and social media platforms are diametrically opposed. parents want their kids doing homework, if they're going to look at tv or any content, they want them protected from bad stuff. that's not happening right now. and what we've seen with the platforms and this is what we asked the ceo of instagram is that they're putting more money into wooing teens to keep them on the site because it's a feeder group that gets addicted to their product. they see more ads and c

according to planned parenthood, it works 95% to 999% of the tim. it's very effective and has been used for years and it has a great safety profile. jim? >> john harwood, i wonder, is this a direct response to the law in texas which now yet again has been allowed to stand by the supreme court and other courts? is it a way, in other words, to give women in a tate like texas access to an abortion? >> reporter: hard to say it's direct response. this has been percolating since april when the fda suspended the rule that said it had to include an in-person visit by the patient. but i think you can't ignore the context here. you have a supreme court that seems poised to either sharply restrict or eliminate the right to abortion codified in roe v. wade at some point within the next coming months. and as you mentioned, the texas law has effectively outlawed abortion there. and so you have an executive branch that has limited options to respond. they can't legislatively protect the right to abortion because they don't have the votes in congress. what they can