past couple months it is becoming increasingly brutal police state and yet the united states stands by the monarchy the united states has refused to condemn the intervention by the neighboring family dictatorships to suppress what is at least as a legitimate a pro-democracy movement as we've seen in other arab states and matthew you know you think about that in new york. i think that we've heard the phrase double standard thrown around i think that what we're actually seeing is a relatively consistent set of standards applied to wildly differing circumstances in libya there was an urgent call to action the arab league asked us to intervene. forces were moving towards benghazi and moammar gadhafi promised to raise the city and killed citizens in bahrain there are these abuses in their tragic and they're awful and they're evil there's not something that we can do we can stop a motorcade from going to particular city because these forces are in the same cities they're both in the nama. so there's just not the same urgent call for a response so when you think about that i mean they're they

hundred years because i would say get out the united states say states says to cuba go to hell the united states is place the embargo on cuba i mean what could cuba do to the united states other than surrender in other words that's i think what the u.s. government is demanding well if you will this i'm going to go on the united states process of democratization it could recognize that the opposition on that island is not mercenaries in the pay of united states it can begin to open up an excuse me i think of truth on that island ok i have to jump in here we have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on cuban state with our team. hungry for the full story we've got it first the biggest issues get a human voice face to face with the news makers on the t.v. . they say this is not a problem in the war. which it should say everybody is sure to support the dream speech so they have no idea about the hardships to face. plate one it says it all comes to the same. for any army the life that you say is the most precious thing in the world. uses of self-sacrifice a

the united states and particularly its intelligence services worry about an attack on the united states that is not nuclear weapons chemical that is not biological but is technological. a surprise attack against its satellites is a catastrophic. scenario studied by the u.s. forces by knocking out fifty u.s. military satellites the chinese could literally cripple the u.s. . they could prevent the military from being able to communicate with its forces they could blind the u.s. intelligence community which uses electro optics satellites to determine military force movements around the world and they could also cripple the guidance systems that are used on precision guided munitions that are satellite guided. in many senses could be a kind of an electronic pearl harbor. without space the u.s. would be unable to conduct any type of military operation in an effective way. the civilian space industry generates more than two hundred fifty billion dollars every year the destruction of even a single orbiting satellite could put at risk the economy daily lives and well being of millions of citize

yes i do the even though the united states is -- >> the united states -- people are moving into enclaves, john, by race and ethnicity, all over this country. >> irish need not apply was the sign in the window when this date nation was dominantly what, uk settled? >> no, this was dominantly british. >> right. >> but it took generations before the irish were -- >> because of the set into which they came! this setting today is different. >> john, take a look -- >> it's multi-cultural! it's multilingual. >> john, you got a multi- cultural -- >> go ahead. >> i don't think the wave of the future is racial and ethnic enclaves this this country. i think people are and will assimilate but i also think a lot more americans will learn to speak spanish, and i think that's a fine thing. >> again, i get back to the distinction between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. legal immigrants that come from central and south america assimilated. they're grateful to be in the united states. they exercise their right to vote. the illegal immigrants and we've seen this over the past couple months, actuall

the united states. you see, mexico doesn't protect its border any better than the united states does. so people all over the world go into mexico and they sneak across into the united states and in these border county jails 34% of those people are foreign nationals who have committed a crime and gotten caught and are locked up in local jails. now, to say that there is not a crime problem on the border is not reality because, you see, if the border was secure, and that is the federal government's job is to secure the border, if the border was secure you wouldn't have these people coming into the united states committing crimes because they couldn't get across, the ones that are illegally crossing into the united states. and these are not rich counties. these are poor counties. these counties don't have a lot of revenue. and it's very difficult for these counties to house and feed and take care of the medical issues of cross-border crime, but they are saddled with that responsibility because the federal g

who cares it doesn't matter to the united states in terms of. but any kind of interests or energy or anything else how does it not matter in terms of oil how does that not matter in terms of what your bailiwick and your kind of real area of expertise is which is islamic fundamentalist terrorism with al qaeda how would that not matter to the u.s. well is it of course it doesn't matter we're going to have to take care of that ourselves but we've been we've been very childish in our approach to it already we depended on sol in yemen we did president musharraf in pakistan none of that's worked out ultimately if we're going to defeat the islamists it's going to be theft it's going to have to be done by u.s. military power is that what we're doing hardly if the world thinks that they've seen the amount of power and destruction that can be exerted by the u.s. military there are sadly mistaken but why should they because it doesn't have the kind of anti-american sentiment about u.s. foreign policy that you say is fueling i don't nobody likes to get bomb

united states really is. according to the justice department, the homicide rate declined from a spike of 10.5 per 1 hundred thousand in 1991 to 6.1 in 2000. both of those in 1967. by comparison according to the who homicide rate in france, germany and great britain the word 0.6, zero.six and zero.9 respectively. children in the united states are far more likely to be shot and killed by their counterparts in other industrial nations. the firearm homicide rate is 16 times higher for american children. united states homicide rate in evolving -- it is the united states homicide rate involving handguns that makes the united states stand apart internationally. in 1996 handguns were used to monitor--murder 30 people in great britain, 106 in canada. fifteen in japan and 9,390 in the united states. the center for disease control reports the rate of firearm deaths, the number of americans shot to death as hovering between 8.8 and 9.2 for white americans from 2000 to 2005. between 7.5, and seven.8 for hispanic or latino

compared to the united states and extraordinarily poor country. where sweden does have a lot of socialism is the labor market. the government is heavily interventionist and we were about who to become what you have to pay and what conditions there are and that sort of thing. one of the arguments that always has been made by sweden works is a tremendous amount of what we call social capital. you know, it is a country that partly because it is ethnically and religiously and linguistically homogenous it is characterized by very high levels of public trust. people trust each other and cooperate with each other. there is a strong sense of national identity, and that makes your institutions a lot more effective. it seems to be something that is true of the smaller homogenous countries the northern european welfare states tend to be. but then you start looking at the way that the amount of socialists have in the labour market and the way that people work and to give up their jobs and things like that. then you will notice that it's starting to correct th

united states is place the embargo on cuba i mean what could cuba do to the united states other than surrender in other words that's i think what the u.s. government is demanding well if you will this and i'm going to i mean it's state process of democratization it could recognize that the opposition on that island is not mercenaries in the pay of united states it can begin to open up an excuse me i think of truth on that island ok i have to jump in here we have to go to break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on cuban state with our team. we have seen the damage it has done to our environment mark and the calls but the pork products we do not want any more new g.m.o. foods. our core system a system that was abysmal experience and i'm just i'm just appalled that that's allowed to go on america. feeding this unfortunately because we don't know what's in it there's no they willing there for the news they can the board for the experiment and the news is getting. old now we have more questions than we have had three guards. like. lucic team has been to the chili ou

one hundred years the cuban say get out the united states say states says to cuba go to hell the united states has placed the embargo on cuba i mean what could cuba do to the united states other than surrender in other words that's i think what the u.s. government is demanding and well in the school system in florida and the united states' process of democratization could recognize that the opposition is on that island is not mercenaries in the pay of the united states it can begin to open up and excuse me i think of truth on that island ok i have to jump in here we have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on cuban state with r.t. . close up to you has been to the show ya been screeching for the long lost secret of thomas steel it's been discovered. the finale archie goes east of lake baikal with the longest russian railway line runs. for the sunday desert lies among siberian mountains the first people full of the same roots as hundreds of years ago . welcome to the trance like kali. russian close up on the part. wealthy british scientists. dr. marg

they hate the united states. from our self-interest we don't want to have these people take power even if their democratically elected. it is going to be bad for us. when oil does to $200 a barrel and we have war breaking out in the middle east and the iranians furthering their hegemony in the region and they get nuclear-weapons we will be facing a lot worse problem than we have today. it is wonderful that people want to have self rule and democracy but our hands off policy, you guys work it out and we will intervene later is a big mistake because the actors in the region want to influence events like iran or syria or other bad guy states or libya. they will fill that vacuum. we are either players in this or we will be the victim of it and i think the administration needs to get moving and do something about it. >> we weren't speaking about a few things about this crisis before breakfast and two things that are uppermost in my mind are education and following the money trail which is oil. we were all so -- we hea

hundred years the cuban say get out the united states say the state says to cuba go to hell the united states has placed the embargo on cuba i mean what could cuba do to the united states other than surrender in other words that's i think what the u.s. government is demanding well if you will this i'm going to go in the united states process of democratization it could recognize that the opposition on that island is not that well wishers i mean it mercenaries in the pay of the united states it can begin to open up an excuse me i think of truth on that island ok i have to jump in here we have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on cuban state with our team. download the official tea allocation chobani phone the i pod touch from the saps to . life on the go. video on demand on t.v.'s mine comes and says feeds now in the palm of your. questions on the com. we'll. bring you the latest in science and technology from around the world. we've got the future covered. wealthy british scientists. are not. the market. to. find out what's really happening to th

united states has an interest in intervening. in both cases there is a strong presence to all of us. moving. in syria paul paul will have to leave it there it's very interesting at bearing in mind your experience as a former reagan administration official to hear what you have to say about the ongoing developments there in the middle east and north africa thank you very much paul craig roberts joining us live here in arctic thank you. well that brings us now to twenty five minutes past the hour business is next here with me tree. welcome to business it's good to have your company russian oil companies once they have the new coil expected to present plans for the first exploration projects of the arctic shelf by the first of september lukoil is already operating offshore and places to invest the dozens of billions of dollars into shelf exploration in russia and abroad as well but of reports. it's not another disaster in the ocean it's a take of the our training center for workers developing offshore oil and gas deposits the comple

as alarming as such numbers maybe, the united states homicide rate involving -- it is the united states homicide rate involving handguns that makes the united states stand apart internationally. in 1996, for example, handguns were used to murder 30 people in great britain, 106 in canada, 15 in japan, and 9,390 in the united states. the cdc, center for disease control, reports the rate of firearm deaths, that is the number of americans shot to death per hundred thousand as hovers between 8.8 and 9.2 for white americans in 2000 and 2005, between 7.5 and 7.8 for hispanic or latino americans, and between 18.4 and 19.3 for african-americans. such statistics suggest that there is something unique and frightening happening in the united states. of course, the homicide rate is only one measure of violence. i talk about all kinds of different things in the book. and in part, that's the point. to sort of look at under currents of violence in american life to look at what i call the ethoughts of violence in american culture and american society. and accordingly, i spend time in the book in the fir

nations when in reality only when the united states wants to do these types of military actions does it happen the u.s. is the main driving force behind it there is no such thing as nato without the united states so let's be clear here that the u.s. is running this operation i wouldn't say that it's only about political calculations though i do think that some of the key people within the obama administration are what i would call cruise missile liberals people like susan rice people like samantha power who do believe in sort of a humanitarian bombing or humanitarian war which of course should be just a grotesquely oxymoronic phrase but you do have some pretty key neal liberals that have pushed for these kinds of wars before susan rice for instance the u.n. the u.s. ambassador to the u.n. before obama was elected was really agitating for similar action to be taken in sudan calling for airstrikes and aiding rebels on the ground so i think this is part of the kind of cruise missile liberal cup all that permeates some of these more right wing democratic circles got to really driving the

but so i have repeatedly called not only the united states government but every other government to live up to that obligation. i don't think. the crimes that can be swept under the rug and pretend that they didn't happen and if that's. so for people who think that that will enhance the reputation of the united states abroad that's exactly the opposite of what will happen in the united states insist on all other countries to live up to their human rights of the geisha and some one of them is to investigate torture so i think this has to happen here as well bringing it to light. perhaps not exactly all right i want to thank you so much for joining me one mendez a un special rapporteur on cruel inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment thank you very much a pleasure to be. wealthy british. markets. find out what's really happening to the global economy because the report. says it's ready to assist peace talks in libya. to the country but i don't this is the. the first step to a ground invasion. and all the talk is that we rushing for me to take down two major terror targets in the sou

states to intervene in the internal affairs of yemen the fact is that the united states has been waging a covert war inside yemen for the past ten years and it has been ratcheted up dramatically by the obama administration in december of two thousand and nine president obama authorized two very deadly airstrikes against yemen involving tomahawk cruise missiles with cluster bombs that can shred human beings and the alleged target of those air strikes in december of zero nine were members of al qaeda in the arabian peninsula in reality though one of the strikes killed twenty one children and scores of others civilians and another strike that the u.s. did killed an important tribal leader in yemen who in fact was trying to work out a mediation program with the members of al qaeda in the arabian peninsula so as long as ali abdullah saleh the president of yemen allows the united states to his country to kill people inside of yemen and he himself will take responsibility for those actions as has been revealed by the wiki leaks cables showing that he conspired with david petraeus and other u.s

hundred years the cuban say get out the united states say states says to cuba go to hell the united states has placed the embargo on cuba i mean what could cuba do to the united states other than surrender in other words that's i think what the u.s. government is demanding well if you will this and i'm going to go in the united states process of democratization it could recognize that the opposition leaders on that island is not which is a minute mercenaries in the pay of the united states it can begin to open up an excuse me i think of truth on that island ok i have to jump in here we have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on cuban state with r.t. . we have seen the damage it has done to our environment mark chemicals with the bar props we do not want anymore a new deal molds. our core system is to say there was a cause more experience and i'm just i'm just appalled that that's allowed to go on americans. are getting this unfortunately because we don't know what's in it there's no labeling there for it being used like the board to experiment

very unlikely outside the united states. again, on china relations, there may be differences between these groups in terms of how they view these differences. but the approach has to be brought in terms of seeking some -- there are variations there, but no difference in terms of policy. in terms of the diagnosis of what the problem is. i think there is a broad consensus that we don't have many options vis a vis pakistan. a democracy promotion has no basis. there are instances on that issue. to sum up, what we see is a pragmatism moving away from idealism that is characterized in foreign policy in the cold war period. the story is not complete. it could go back. public sentiment is very intense. we discuss issues we would not have been discussing earlier. we characterize that as public debate even though the shift has not -- is not complete. the conventional wisdom approach we have taken we see as the pragmatic approach coming stronger and shifting away from the idealistic movement as reducing. i think we are somewhat cautiou

in the united states. so, would you see this a crisis? we do and we believe the response must come in the form of a national strategy that recognizes once and for all the global economy isn't a level playing field and the pleading field will not level itself, government around the world see this, the governments in the united states state and federal need to see it too. many business leaders reference reject the idea of government interference with business. i don't think we should see it that way. governments of the rule of the road i'm definitely a firm believer in free markets but as i've learned the last few years sometimes the wisdom of the markets feel less. the collective good sometimes persisted by the markets and greed in fact just like wall street should you in that instant they do not insure the global and national economic conditions are taken care of. markets can never be a substitute for the kind of long-range thinking the government provide. only government can create the kind of policy fram

is the for support of the united states militarily for for. actions that we're not sure about yet i think if you dare say what i said i'm sorry i have a few more time but it is a very interesting point many thanks my guess a day in washington and austin and thanks to our viewers for watching us here are t. see you next time and remember cross talk rules. and you can. download the official anti up location giovanni phone the i pod touch from the i ching sampson. the jaunty life on the go. video on demand keys a minefield comes an r.s.s. feeds now in the palm of your. question on the quality dot com. it. could. be. wrong.

so so then that raises the question why the united states more time to be there why does the united states when you think a game it's the united states now i think the end game is to. get rid of the regime for several reasons one it breaks up china as well supplied from from libya to get rid of gadhafi who refuse to join the united states paratrooper in command you know we've set up an african command and in two thousand and seven the purpose i think was to counteract china's economic penetration. with american military organization so you get forty nine of the african countries and the united states eric information ok does he refuse to that's another reason to want him out of the third reason is he's not a us puppet and so we the americans don't completely control the mediterranean coast now i'm sorry king of the mediterranean one issue i want to put up you brought up written a little bit about syria where there is you know protest then going on now do you think that the united states syria is much closer to a libya as far as its relation to the united states then egypt or other countrie

states intention to dominate space by doing so china also show the united states that any orbiting weapon can be shot down. we wouldn't really want to see in the future and surrounded by ultimately weapons which will make many times even more vulnerable than the situation today. at the united nations china with many other nations has since the 1980's been trying to expand the nine hundred sixty seven outer space treaty. presently the treaty prohibits placing nuclear weapons in space but doesn't prohibit conventional weapons. each year this design meant initiative is rejected by the united states. it is a hundred sixty to one hundred seventy one united states is the only nation actually voted against this were isolated on this issue. what we thought is pushed our allies into consideration of more strategic independence from the united states in space and some people would argue perhaps in europe that that's a good thing maybe it's better that your pastor teach it independence and space because they can serve as a counterweight but from a a u.s. viewpoint it would seem to me that you would

now the debt clock is ticking as the united states reaches its debt ceiling of fourteen point three trillion dollars next month the debate over raising it has descended upon washington to raise the risk defaulting on the country's debts those are really the two things at stake now today u.s. president obama revealed his plan for deficit and debt reduction showing also this warning our debt has grown so large that we could do real damage to the economy if we don't begin a process now to get our fiscal house in order. yeah no kidding but china being the u.s. is name creditor and us debt reaching what the entire economy produces in g p r t's marina port iowa shows how the debts already and taking a toll. in a city that never. thought that continues to go within ten thousand dollars per second when i was first installed no one was really aware of what that was nor could most people tell you the difference between the gap it or the so that blocks stands vigil keeping track of the national that jordan borrow it's represents the durst organization the new york real estate firm that operates the see

states to go after peace activists in the mideast i mean the midwest of the united states over twenty peace activists are now resisting the special grand jury that was called to go after them and so we have this problem in the united states to i know the united states also just now criticized for something that a lot of people see as a human rights abuse and that is the case of first class bradley manning. united nations representative on torture i'm talking about one mendez he just issued a reprimand to the united states and this is something that's where this is something that doesn't happen in terms of the u.n. issuing reprimands to the u.s. usually it's to much more authoritarian countries and it says you know he wanted to meet with bradley manning and the u.s. refused to let him so that's that's one case that's going on here but it's interesting when you look at this report this human rights private came out and talk about some of the finding activists like yourselves journalists detained and arrested talk about some of the sort of what you see as hypocrisy in this report that th

to tech united states to put the united states out of the middle east and the authoritarian regimes of the united states in the middle east would then fall so saudi arabia would fall and the mubarak regime would fall. this was the principal aim of the law non 9/11. the opposite happened. we occupied if and stan and iraq. the strategy did not think carefully in terms of what he was actually trying to achieve. none of the outcomes have anything to do with al qaeda. it was the popular revolution about any cannibal government. the strategy didn't work on 9/11. we made some strategic missteps in response. osama bin laden going back to the question of why is more the answer he thought war was the answer because it was the only way to basically put enough pressure on the united states to change its policies in the muslim world. that turned out to be untrue. when we spoke to him in 1997 he based that analysis on the idea of the united states is week as the former soviet union which he had fought in afghanistan. he based that on our withdrawal from vietnam and beirut in 1983 after the attacks a

the support of the united states militarily for for. actions that we're not sure about yet i think if you dare say what i've done we're going to have to give you more time but it is a very interesting point many thanks my guest today in washington and austin and thanks to our viewers for watching us here arche see you next time and remember cross talk rules.

you know the united states. russia was wanting. nuclear technology during the bush administration which i have it's a great point and really it's ostrich and really quickly robert i'm curious about a double standard in congress because earlier we heard a florida lawmaker in the hearing today criticize cuba as a sponsor of terrorism when criticizing the land but california report showed brought light and helped free a terrorist responsible for the bombing of a cuban airliner that killed seventy three people is there a double standard in congress well certainly ross slayton you know this is her track record of years her definition of terrorist has been to the she doesn't like to as a reporter when you know when it comes to cuban exiles using terrorism against your government a quarter that's terrorism it's well documented for years all right i want to thank you farai for going back and forth with me on those many interesting issues coming out of congress then dealing with the united nations today that was robert naiman director of je

would of course united states lead. well yet again please you know so you think it's all just a ploy that the united states has kind of slowly step back and aren't already taneja with what we know nato wouldn't be there if united states didn't seem to be . so so then that raises the question why the united states wants him to be there why does the united states waiting for a game it's the united states now i think the end game is to. get rid of that regime for several reasons one breaks up the channels or supply from libya to it gets rid of gadhafi who refused to join the united states african command you know we've set up an african command and two thousand and seven and the purpose i think was to counteract china's economic penetration. with american military organization so look at forty nine of the african countries and the united states african man and he does he refused so that's another reason to want him out and a third reason is he's not a us puppet and so we the americans don't completely control the mediterra

you know the united states. the russian were supplying. nuclear technology to the bush administration it's a great point and really it's posture and really quickly robert i'm curious about a double standard in congress because earlier we heard a florida lawmaker in a hearing today criticize cuba as a sponsor of terrorism when criticizing the u.n. but killing for its report showed off light and helped free a terrorist responsible for the bombing of a cuban airliner that killed seventy three people is there a double standard in congress who certainly rossley you know this is or her track record of yours her definition of terrorists people just like. there's your point you know when it comes to cuban exiles using terrorism you can go to that's not terrorism that's worked on for years all right i want to thank you for going back and forth with me on those many interesting issues coming out of congress in dealing with the united nations today that was robert naiman director of just foreign policy that up going to do it for now for more on the s

from the united states? >> we're asking for 1.$1.61 $9 billion for the regular budget and for other international organizations. not all united nations. it is the regular budget request as a subset of that -- that is 568 million and for peacekeeping for fiscal year 12, we're requesting $1.90 billion in -- and to apply another to under $25 million in existing credits to meet our contributions which we estimate will be $2.145 billion. >> what does that add up to? >> i can get you that in the second. it is 1.619 + 2.145. >> providing this type of money to an organization that uses israel as a punching bag is something that is not acceptable. the people in the united nations who are using israel as a punching bag are people who they themselves are guilty of major crimes against humanity. whether it is time and the gendercide we hear about or the countries who murder and repress their people. let me ask you this going to the question of my position on claptrap. >> are you ready? >> all right. do you believe the u

got virtually no notice in the united states either the media the corporate media mainstream media the united states even even even my show i did interview to me year ago i didn't want to talk about it nobody wanted to we all just figured he was a crazy but he got the video out there he added out largely through a christian group in the middle east that was trying to evangelize and whatnot and and trashes on and it went viral and the consequence of this is that people are furious i mean you know this is so the question is you know one question is you know what's our future in afghanistan and how this is affecting or discuss that in just a minute other questions or what could be done about terri jo. the supreme court in two thousand and three in a case called virginia vs brown virginia had a law that made it illegal to burn crosses two guys. k.k.k. guys were having a party out at a farm in the woods and two guys burn a cross they got arrested for another guy burned across the black man's front yard both cases went to the supreme court and supreme court combined them into one and ruled t

his war against the united states 10 years after 9/11. he spoke about his book at the philadelphia free library. >> good evening, everyone. i think it is perhaps a troubling time to be talking about the subject but the events of the day of the past month perhaps, six weeks, requires us all i think to rethink how we stand in the mideast. so tonight i'd like to talk about the three threats to the united states that emanate from the persian gulf. iran, saudi arabia, and what i call al qaeda -ism. in speaking tonight about the persian gulf, and our war against the islamist militancy emanating i want to start with words george washington used to describe new national governments responsibility to ensure that americans clearly understand the threats they face at home and abroad. i am sure the massive citizens of these united states meanwhile, washington told john j. in 1796. and i believe they will always act well, whenever they can obtain a right understanding of matters. let me say that i share washington's fate and essentially sound common s

actors state actors like united states getting in the game who stand to benefit in the us right now and say it's a draw because look at the what's happening on the ground in libya it's basically a stalemate khadafi did not go away as everybody thought he was he's actually in trenching his forces in tripoli so i would say that the the success of the program the proper propaganda program it did not succeed in getting rid of could. i would say that the program so far is is a failure for the united states and they're saying the u.s. is the loser and that's one thing i want to ask about the story too you know it's kind of pointed out the irony that the united states government helps to remove firewalls to the internet in the middle east and in china and meanwhile u.s. corporations put up those firewalls to do business in countries that censor the internet do you see an irony there i don't i mean corporations aren't are beholden to capitalism never holding to their shareholders i would expect them to just couto to whatever us government policy as well but we see a relationship and we've s

that don't seem to have that much interest for the united states but they do because the united states is looking for influence all over all over the world and who loses out with case well you know who loses out in the end are the people who are fighting for actual reform or democratic change or human rights the things that the united states says that we are fighting for in those countries the people who are actually doing that work on the ground are the ones who are losing out because they can't afford to pay any davis a million dollars a year to defend human rights and equitorial giddy but the dictator of that. it does have that money and i guess if you're a dictator of a country where there are human tarion issues as well as strategic resource and other issues maybe you do with kayla and i want to thank you for being here and there was a time when americans boldly went when no where no man had gone before but fast forward to two thousand and eleven and the u.s. has effectively shuttered its manned spaceflight program it's invested in a f. twenty two is putting those in the air in th