1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Jennifer Heyman; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Lauren Human
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/hfx8y/
1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Jessica Wallace Stewart; Jeremy C. Biesanz
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/d8xqc/
1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
This is the fourth study in a 4-study sequence. This study will examine how the domain of focus (e.g., affective states or personality traits) influences accuracy. The prediction is that judges who focus on affect will achieve higher accuracy for traits than judges who focus on traits. This is consistent with STAM, but counterintuitive because it is natural to think that focusing on traits would result in more accurate trait judgments, and therefore this is a strong test of the State and Trait...
Source: https://osf.io/ynve2/
1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
This study will examine how the domain of focus (e.g., affective states or personality traits) influences accuracy. The prediction is that judges who focus on affect will achieve higher accuracy for traits than judges who focus on traits. This is consistent with STAM, but counterintuitive because it is natural to think that focusing on traits would result in more accurate trait judgments, and therefore this is a strong test of the State and Trait Accuracy Model. The rationale is that focusing...
Source: https://osf.io/4zt8n/
3
3.0
-
-
-
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 3
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/tzfsu/
1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Jeremy C. Biesanz; Anita Schmalor; Winnie Tse
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/z8fpr/
1
1.0
-
-
-
by
Jeremy C. Biesanz; Jessica Wallace Stewart
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/tvs63/
