1
1.0
Apr 8, 2022
04/22
by
Jennifer Heyman; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Lauren Human
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/hfx8y/
1
1.0
Aug 22, 2021
08/21
by
Jeremy C. Biesanz; Anita Schmalor; Winnie Tse
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/z8fpr/
1
1.0
Aug 28, 2021
08/21
by
Jeremy C. Biesanz; Jessica Wallace Stewart
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/tvs63/
1
1.0
Aug 20, 2021
08/21
by
Jessica Wallace Stewart; Jeremy C. Biesanz
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/d8xqc/
1
1.0
Sep 8, 2021
09/21
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
This study will examine how the domain of focus (e.g., affective states or personality traits) influences accuracy. The prediction is that judges who focus on affect will achieve higher accuracy for traits than judges who focus on traits. This is consistent with STAM, but counterintuitive because it is natural to think that focusing on traits would result in more accurate trait judgments, and therefore this is a strong test of the State and Trait Accuracy Model. The rationale is that focusing...
Source: https://osf.io/4zt8n/
3
3.0
Aug 20, 2021
08/21
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 3
favorite 0
comment 0
Source: https://osf.io/tzfsu/
1
1.0
Sep 12, 2021
09/21
by
Tera D. Letzring; Judith Allen Hall; Jeremy C. Biesanz; Sheherezade Krzyzaniak
data
eye 1
favorite 0
comment 0
This is the fourth study in a 4-study sequence. This study will examine how the domain of focus (e.g., affective states or personality traits) influences accuracy. The prediction is that judges who focus on affect will achieve higher accuracy for traits than judges who focus on traits. This is consistent with STAM, but counterintuitive because it is natural to think that focusing on traits would result in more accurate trait judgments, and therefore this is a strong test of the State and Trait...
Source: https://osf.io/ynve2/