Skip to main content

Full text of "Host galaxy morphologies of X-ray selected AGN: assessing the significance of different black hole fueling mechanisms to the accretion density of the Universe at z~1"

See other formats

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000-000 (0000) Printed 23 April 2009 (MN KTeX style file v2.2) 

Host galaxy morphologies of X-ray selected AGN: assessing the 
significance of different black hole fueling mechanisms to the 

^ accretion density of the Universe at z^l. 

o : 
o : 

<^ A. Georgakakis 1 *, A. L. Coil 2 , E. S. Laird 3 , R. L. Griffith 4 , K. Nandra 3 , J. M. Lotz 5 , 
Pr*. C. M. Pierce 6 , M. C. Cooper 7 , J. A. Newman 8 , A. M. Koekemoer 9 











^National Observatory of Athens, V. Paulou & I. Metaxa, 11532, Greece 

^Department of Physics and Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Oilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 

3 Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, Prince Consort Rd , London SW7 2AZ, UK 

4 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California lnstiture of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 

5 National Optical Astronomy Obsen>atory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 

6 Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, CA 95064, USA 

"' Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721-0065, USA 

8 University of Pittsburgh, Physics & Astronomy Department, 3941 O'Hara Street Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA 

3 'Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 

23 April 2009 


We use morphological information of X-ray selected AGN hosts to set limits on the fraction 
of the accretion density of the Universe at z w 1 that is not likely to be associated with major 
mergers. Deep X-ray observations are combined with high resolution optical data from the 
Hubble Space Telescope in the AEGIS, GOODS North and GOODS South fields to explore 
the morphological breakdown of X-ray sources in the redshift interval 0.5 < z < 1.3. The 
sample is split into disks, early-type bulge-dominated galaxies, peculiar systems and point- 
sources in which the nuclear source outshines the host galaxy. The X-ray luminosity function 
and luminosity density of AGN at z w 1 are then calculated as a function of morphological 
type. We find that disk-dominated hosts contribute 30 ± 9 per cent to the total AGN space 
density and 23 ± 6 per cent to the luminosity density at z 1. We argue that AGN in disk 
galaxies are most likely fueled not by major merger events but by minor interactions or internal 
instabilities. We find evidence that these mechanisms may be more efficient in producing 
luminous AGN (Lx > 10 44 ergs _1 ) compared to predictions for the stochastic fueling of 
massive black holes in disk galaxies. 

Key words: Surveys - galaxies: starbursts - galaxies: evolution - X-rays: galaxies 


It is well established that Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), which are 
signposts of accretion events onto the supermassive black holes 
(SMBHs) at the centres of galaxies, evolve strongly with cosmic 
time. Observational programs over the last 35 years have shown 
that the sp ace density of these systems has a broad peak at z ~ 
1 - 3 ( e.g.lHasinger et al]|2005l ; iBrusa et alj2008l : ISilverman etail 
l2008bl : I Aird et al.l 120081) followed by a decline by almost 2 dex 
to the present day (e.g. lUeda et aljHooH : lHasinger et all 120051 ; 
Barge ret alj 120051) . The physical interpretation of the observed 
rapid evolution of the AGN population however, is still a matter 


of considerable debate. An important piece of the puzzle is the pro- 
cess that triggers the accretion of material onto the central SMBH. 

A major galaxy merger is one of the popular mechanisms 
suggested to be responsible for fueling AGN. Numerical SPH 
(Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic) simulations demonstrate that 
these violent events ar e very efficient in funneling gas to the nuclear 
galaxy regions (e.g. lHernquist|[T989l : | Barnes & Hernquistl 1 1991 . 
1996), where it can be con sumed by the SMBH (Spring e! et al.l 
20051 : |Pi Matteo et al.ll2005T) . This scenario is also attractive be- 

cause galaxy bulges are built parallel to the formation of SMBHs 
at their centres, thereby providing a physical interpretation for the 
observed tight correlation between bul ge velocity dispersion and 
black hole mass in ne arby galaxies (e.g iFerrarese & Merrittfl20"o"ol 
Gebhardt et al. 2000). As a result, most s emi-analytic cosmolog- 
ical simulations of galaxy formation (e.g. ISomerville et alj|2008t) 

2 Georgakakis et al. 

use major mergers as the primary mechanism for growing SMBHs. 
In this scenario, changes with redshift of the AGN space density 
are intimately related to the evolution of the major merger rate in 
the Universe. 

Observations provide some support to the simulations de- 
scribed above, thereby suggesting that SMBHs can be fuelled by 
major mergers. In the local Universe for example, the popula- 
tion of Ultra-Luminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs ) , which are 
domi n ated by major merg ers (e.g. ISurace et al. I ll998l ;l Born e et al.l 
2000; iFarrah et al.l |2001), include a large fraction of systems 
that show AGN signatures at optical and/or X-ra y wavelengths 
dSanders & Mirabel|[l99"6l; iFranceschini et alj|2003h . Additionally, 
a large fraction of luminous QSOs at low redshift are associated 
with either morph ologically disturbed galaxie s , suggesting ongoin g 
tidal encounters dCanalizo & StocktonlbOQll ; iGuvon et al.l 2006). 
or early type hosts with fine structure in t heir optical light dis- 
tribution, indicative of past interactions (e.g. ICanalizo et al.ll2007l ; 
Benn ert et al. 2008). Moreover, the excess of optical neighbours 
around z < 0.4 QS Os on small scales (« 0.1 — 0.5 Mpc) com- 
pared to L t galaxies dSerber et alj|2006h and the higher fraction of 
QSO pairs with separations < 0.1 Mpc compared to the expecta- 
tion o n large (> 3 Mpc) scales dHennawi et al.l l2006: Mye rs et all 
120071) . both suggest that galaxy mergers play an important role in 
the evolution of QSOs. 

Despite the evidence above, it is also recognized that many 
AGN are not fueled by major mergers. In the nearby Universe 
for example, many Seyferts, which represent intermediate and low 
luminosity AG N, are associated with non-interacting spirals (e.g. 
IHq et alj|l997l) . The small scale environment (<0.1Mpc) of nar- 
row line AGN, including a large fraction of Seyferts, in the Sloan 
Digital Sky Survey suggests that major galaxy interaction s cannot 
expla in the observed activity in the bulk of the population dLi et al.l 
2008). It is believed that the SMBHs of these systems accrete cold 
gas stochastically by mechanisms such as ba r instabilities or minor 
tidal disruptions rather than major mergers ( Ho pkins & Hernquisq 
2006). It is also suggested that minor interactions and secular 
evolution are important at low redshift (z < 1) and low lumi- 
nosities (e.g. Lx < 10 43 ergs _1 ), while major mergers domi- 
nate at high redshifts and br ight luminosities (e.g. lHasingeil feoOS; 
Hopki ns"& Hernquistl [2006). Compared to models where major 
mergers drive the history of luminous accr etion at all epochs (e.g. 
iHopkins et al .l2006USomerville et al.l2008h . the scenario above of- 
fers an alternative interpretation of the evolution of AGN based on 
a change with redshift of the dominant fueling mode of the SMBH. 

Although there is no doubt that AGN are fueled by mech- 
anisms that do not involve major mergers, as yet there are no 
robust limits on the relative contribution of such mechanisms to 
the total accretion luminosity. One way to address this issue is 
to study the morphology of the AGN host galaxies. In the stan- 
dard view of major mergers any pr e-existing disks are destro yed to 
form a bulge dominated remnant dBarnes & Hern quist 1996J, e.g). 
Therefore, AGN hosted by either disturbed/irregular systems or 
spheroidal galaxies are likely associated with ongoing or past major 
mergers, respectively. In contrast, AGN in disk galaxies are candi- 
dates for the stochastic SMBH fueling mode. Although recent sim- 
ulations show that under certain condi tions (e.g. high gas fraction) 
disks can survive major mergers (e.g . Springel & Hernquist 2005; 
lRobertsonetal.|[2 006; Hop kins et alJl2008l ; lGovernato et al.ll2008l) . 
it is also claimed that the formation of a remnant with a large disk 
requires conditions which are often not associated with substantial 
SMBH fueling (e.g. lHopkins & HernquisH 2008a). The fraction of 
AGN in disk galaxy hosts therefore, remains a strong constraint on 

Table 1. Chandra observations details 


Obs. IDs 




0.5-7 keV 


(dcg 2 ) 










580, 957, 966, 967 , 1671, 2232, 
2233, 2234, 2344, 2386, 2421, 
2423, 3293, 3294, 3388-3391, 
3408, 3409 






581 441 582 1672 2405 2239 2312 
2313 2406 2409 1431 8591-8597 
9575 9578 9593 9596 9718 






3305, 4357, 4365, 5841-5854, 
6210-6223, 6366, 6391, 7169 7180, 
7181, 7187. 7188, 7236, 7237, 
7238, 7239 





The columns are: (1): Survey name; (2): Chandra observation IDs used for each survey; (3) expo- 
sure time in Ms after cleaning for flares. In the case of the AEGIS survey with multiple pointings 
the median exposure time per pointing is listed; (4) total surveyed area in dcg ; (5) total number 
of sources in each survey (6) number of 0.5-7 keV selected sources that overlap with the regions 
covered by the HST/ACS observations of each survey. 

the fueling mechanism and/or the conditions under which SMBH 
growth occurs. 

At low redshift for example, about 30 per cent of the power- 
ful Q SOs live in spirals (Canal izo & Stockton! boOll ; IGuvon et al.l 
2006), while at z ~ 1, close to the peak of the accretion his- 
tory of the Universe, about 20-30 per cent of the X-ray selected 
AGN are hosted by late-type disk galaxies dPierce et al.l |2007|; 
iGabor et al.l,2008l) . These observations are often interpreted as ex- 
amples of SMBHs fueled by minor interactions and/or secular evo- 
lution. What is uncertain however, is the luminosity distribution of 
the AGN in disk hosts, i.e. what fraction of the AGN space and 
luminosity density is associated with this type of galaxy. This is 
essential to place a limit on the significance of minor interactions 
and/or internal instabilities to the accretion history of the Universe. 

In this paper we address this issue by estimating, as a func- 
tion of host galaxy morphology, the X-ray luminosity function and 
the X-ray luminosity density of X-ray selected AGN at z ~ 1. 
Our analysis provides a lower-limit to the fraction of AGN fuelled 
by secular evolution and minor mergers or equivallently an upper 
limit in the fraction of AGN in major mergers. For this exercise we 
use deep Chandra surveys with available multi-waveband Hubble 
Space Telescope (HST) observations. The fields of choice are the 
2 Ms Chandra Deep Field North (CDF-North), the 2 Ms Chandra 
Deep Field South (CDF-South) and the A ll-wavelength Ext ended 
Groth strip International Survey (AEGIS; IBavis et all 120071) . Us- 
ing data from these programs has the advantage of publicly avail- 
able follow-up observations, including deep ground-based optical 
photometry and extensive spectroscopy. Throughout this paper we 
adopt a cosmology with Ho = 70kms _1 Mpc - , !2m = 0.3 and 
tt A = 0.7. 


2.1 X-ray observations 

Table[TJpresents information on the Chandra surveys of the AEGIS, 
CDF-North and CDF-South. The X-ray observations of the Ex- 
tended Groth Strip consist of 8 ACIS-I (Advanced CCD Imag- 
ing Spectrometer) pointings, each with a total integration time of 
about 200 ks split in at least 3 shorter exposures obtained at differ- 
ent epochs. The CDF-North X-ray survey consists of 20 individ- 
ual ACIS-I observations, which sum up to a total exposure time of 
2 Ms. The Chandra data in the CDF-South have recently been sup- 

Morphologies of X-ray selected AGN hosts 3 

plemented with new ACIS-I pointings, which have increased the 
total exposure time in that field to about 2 Ms. 

The Chandra observations in the three fields above have been 
reduced and anal ysed in a homoge neous way using the methodol- 
ogy described by Laird et alj J2008b . Briefly, the reduction used the 
CIAO data analysis software. After merging the individual observa- 
tions into a single event file, we constructed images in four energy 
bands 0.5-7.0 keV (full), 0.5-2.0 keV (soft), 2.0-7.0 keV (hard) and 
4.0-7.0 keV (ultra-hard). The count rates in the above energy inter- 
vals are converted to fluxes in the standard bands 0.5-10, 0.5-2, 2-10 
and 5-10keV, respectively. For the full, hard and ultra-hard bands 
this conversion involves an extrapolation from 7 to lOkeV. Sources 
in the flux range probed by the Chandra surveys listed in Table Q] 
have, on average, spectra similar to that of t he cosmic X-ray Back- 
groun d in the 2-10keV band, Y = 1.4 (e.g. lHickox & Markevitchl 
2006). Therefore, to convert source count rates to fluxes we adopt 
a power-law X-ray spectrum with index T = 1.4 absorbed by 
the Galactic hydrogen column density appropriate for each field. 
Adopting r = 1.9 would decrease the estimated fluxes in the 0.5- 
lOkeV band by about 30 per cent. 

The source detection is a two pass process. A list of candi- 
date sources is first constructed by running the WAVDETECT task of 
CIAO at a low detection threshold (10 -4 ). The total counts (source 
and background) at the position of each candidate source are then 
extracted within the 90 per cent Encircled Energy Fraction (EEF) 
radius of the Point Spread Function (PSF; see section 2.2. of Laird 
et al. 2009 for details). A local background value is determined by 
first excluding pixels within the 95 per cent EEF of each candidate 
WAVDETECT source and then summing up the counts in an annulus 
centered on the source with inner radius equal to 1.5 times the 90 
per cent EEF radius and width of 50 arcsec. The probability that the 
candidate source is a random fluctuation of the background is esti- 
mated assuming Poisson statistics. The final catalogue is comprised 
of sources with Poisson probabilities < 4 x 10 -6 in at least one of 
the energy bands defined above. We choose to work with sources 
selected in the 0.5-7 keV energy band because it provides higher 
sensitivity resulting in a larger sample size. As we will only use 
X-ray sources that overlap with the multi-waveband HST surveys 
(see below) of the AEGIS, CDF-North and CDF-South, in Tabled 
we list the number of 0.5-7 keV selected sources that lie in the area 
covered by the HST observations. 

The construction of the sensitivity maps is described by 
iGeorgakakis et alj (2008a). In this paper we will use the 1-D repre- 
sentation of the sensitivity map, the X-ray area curve, which pro- 
vides an estimate of the total survey area in which a source with 
flux fx can be detected. For simplicity we use area curves calcu- 
lated in the standard way, i.e. by assigning a single limiting flux 
to a detection cell, instead of the Bayesian approach developed by 
IGeorgakakis et alj (2008a). The area curves for the HST subregions 
of the AEGIS, CDF-North and CDF-South are shown in Figure^ 

2.2 HST photometry 

High resolution imaging observations from the Hubble Space Tele- 
scope (HST) are used to identify X-ray sources with optical coun- 
terparts and explore the morphology of their host galaxies. 

The Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) aboard HST has 
been used to obtain deep images in the V (F606W, 2260s) and 
I (F814W, 2 100s) filters over a .1 x 70.5arcmin 2 strip in the 
AEGIS field dLotz et alj|2008bl) . The 5 sigma limiting magnitudes 
for a point source are Vf606W = 28.14 (AB) and Ifsuw = 27.52 

10-ie lo-is 
/ x (0.5-10keV) (ergs- 1 cm- 2 ) 

Figure 1. Sensitivity curves in the 0.5-10keV band for the HST cov- 
ered subregions of the CDF-South (dotted), CDF-North (short-dashed) and 
AEGIS (long-dashed). The continuous line is the sum of the individual 

(AB). For extended sources these limits are about 2 mag brighter. 
A total of 15 797 galaxies are detected to Ifsuw ~ 25 mag. 

The HST has also surveyed the central most sensitive part 
of the CDF-North and CDF-South with the ACS as part of the 
GOODS programme (Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey). 
These observations cover a combined area of about 0.08 deg 2 
in four passbands, B (F435W), V (F606W), i (F775W) and z 
(F850LP). The survey setup, data red uction and source detection 
is described bv lGiavalisco et alj (12004). We use the version vl.O of 
the mosaiced ACS images and the version vl.l of the ACS multi- 
band source catalogs. The total exposure time of this data release 
is about 7200, 5000, 5000, and 10660 s in the B, V, i and z filters 
respectively. We use the z-band selected catalogues which include 
a total of 32048 and 29599 sources in the CDF-North and the CDF- 
South respectively. 

The Likelihood Ratio method (LR ; ISutherland & Saunders! 
ll992l:ICiliegi et al.l2003l : lLaird et al]2008h is adopted to identify X- 
ray sources with optical counterparts. In this exercise we estimate 
the ratio between the probability that a source, at a given distance 
from the X-ray position and with a given optical magnitude, is the 
true counterpart and the probability that the source is a spurious 

LR= £M/M (1) 


where q(m) is the expected magnitude distribution of the true op- 
tical counterparts, f(r) is the probability distribution function of 
the positional uncertainties in both the X-ray and the optical source 
catalogues and n(m) is the background density of optical galaxies 
of magnitude m. 

For the positional accuracy of the X-ray sources we adopt a 
Gaussian distribution with standard deviation estimated as a func- 
tion of off-axis a ngle and total number of counts as described by 
lLaird et all d2008l) . The positional uncertainty of the HST source 
lists is also assumed to follow the normal distribution with FWHM 
(Full Width Half Maximum) of 0.07 arcsec for AEGIS dLotz et alj 

4 Georgakakis et al. 

2008b) and 0.12arcsec for the CDF-North and South. In equation 
Q] f(r) is therefore assumed to be a Gaussian with standard de- 
viation equal to the combined optical and X-ray source positional 
errors added in quadrature. 

The a priori probability q(m) that an X-ray source has a coun- 
terpart with magnitude m, is determined as follows. Firstly, the X- 
ray and optical source catalogues are matched by simply finding the 
closest counterpart within a fixed search radius of 2 arcsec. Sec- 
ondly, a total of 100 mock catalogs are constructed by randomis- 
ing the source positions of the HST catalog and the cross-matching 
is repeated. The magnitude distribution of the counterparts in the 
mock and the real catalogs are subtracted to determine the magni- 
tude distribution of the true associations, q(m). 

Having estimated f(r) and q(m) we identify all possible 
counterparts to X-ray sources within a 4 arcsec radius and the LR 
of each one is estimated using equation [TJ We consider as coun- 
terparts those galaxies with LR above a certain limit. The choice 
of the cutoff in LR is a trade off between maximum number of 
counterparts and minimum spurious identification rate. In order to 
assess how secure a n optical counterpart is we use the reliability 
parameter defined bv lSutherland & Saunders] dl992h 



E j LR j + (l-Q) : 


where Reli is the reliability of the i optical counterpart of an X- 
ray source, the index j of the summation runs over all the possible 
counterparts within the search radius and Q is the fraction of X-ray 
sources with identifications to the magnitude limit of the optical 
survey. It can be shown that the sum of the reliabilities of individ- 
ual counterparts equals the expected number of true associations 
(Sutherland & Saunders 1992). Comparison of J~J ; Reli with the 
total number of counterparts with LR > LRnmit provides an es- 
timate of the spurious identification rate. By varying LRn m it one 
can minimise the number of false associations. We chose to use 
LRnmit = 0.5. At this cutoff, 78 (340/437), 74 (201/273) and 81 
(199/245) per cent of the 0.5-7 keV selected X-ray sources in the 
AEGIS, CDF-North and CDF-South, respectively, have counter- 
parts. These fractions are estimated using the total number of X- 
ray sources that overlap with the HST surveys of these fields. The 
estimated spurious identification rate is < 5 per cent. 

2.3 Optical spectroscopy 

Optical spectroscopy of X-ray sourc es in the AEGIS fie ld is primar- 
ily from the DEEP2 redshift survey |Davis et al.l2003f) . which uses 
the DEIMOS spectrograph dFaber et alj|2003h on the 10 m Keck- 
II telescope to obtain redshifts for galaxies to Rab = 24.1 mag. 
The observational setup uses a moderately high resolution grating 
(R » 5000), which provides a velocity precision of 30kms _1 
and a wavelength coverage of 6500-9100 A. This spectral window 
allows the identification of the strong [O II] doublet 3727A emis- 
sion line to z < 1.4. We use DEEP2 galaxies with redshift de- 
termina tions secure at th e > 90% confidence level (quality flag 
Q ^ 3: lDavis et alj2007I) . Spectroscopic observations targeting X- 
ray sources in AEGIS have also been carried out at the MMT using 
the Hectospec fibe r spectrograph. F ull details about these observa- 
tions are given bv lCoil et alj d2009l) . A total of 449 X-ray sources 
were targeted with 5 Hectospec configurations. The data were taken 
in queue mode in May 2007, July 2007, and May 2008. Total inte- 
gration times were 2 hours per configuration. The wavelength cov- 
erage is ~ 4500 — 9000 A at 6 A resolution. The data were re- 

duced using the HSRED IDL reduction pipelin^]. Redshifts were 
measured either from emission lines from the AGN itself or HII re- 
gions if the host galaxy has ongoing star formation, or from the Ca 
H+K absorption features for lower luminosity AGN in early-type 
galaxies with little or no star formation. Although objects were tar- 
geted to Rab = 25, the secure redshift identification rate was 50 
per cent at Rab = 22.5 mag and 15 per cent at Rab = 24.5 mag. 
We obtained high-confidence redshifts for 230 sources, or 51% 
of the targeted sample. The resulting redshifts lie in the range 
< z < 4. The original Groth Strip has been t argeted by a num- 
ber of spectroscopic programs dLillv et al.|[l9 95 ; Brinchman n et al.1 
19981 ; iHopkins et aljhoOCt IVogt et alj|2005h t hat ha ve been com- 
piled into a sing le database by Iweiner et al.l d2005fl The entire 
AEGIS overlaps with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and 
therefore spectra for relati vely bright galaxies and QSOs are also 
available dYork et al.ll 2000). All the above diverse datasets provide 
high confidence spectroscopic redshifts for 159 0.5-7 keV selected 
X-ray sources in the HST/ ACS subregion of the AEGIS. 

Optical spectroscopy in the CDF-N and in the GOODS-North 
is available from either programmes t hat specifically target the 
X-ray population in these fields (e.g. iBarger et alj 120031 120051 : 
Cowie et al. 2003) or the Keck Treasury Redshift Survey (TKRS; 
Wirthetal.lj2004h . The TKRS uses the DEIMOS spectrograph 
dFaber et al J2003h at the Keck-II telescope to observe optically se- 
lected galaxies to Rab ~ 24.4 mag in the GOODS-North. The 
publicly available catalogue consists of about 1400 secure redshifts. 
Out of the 201 X-ray sources selected in 0.5-7 keV band and opti- 
cal counterparts with LH > 0.5, a total of 149 have spectroscopic 

There are many spectroscopic campaigns in the CDF-South. 
These include follow-up observ ations targeting sp ecific popula- 
tions, such as X-ray sourc es I Szoko lv et alj 120041) . i^-band se- 
lecte d galaxies dMignoli et all 20051). and high reds hift candidates 

(e.g. iDickinson 

Mignoli et a 
et al.l 2004; 

well as 

generic spectroscopic s urveys of faint galaxies in the GOODS 
area using the FORS2 dVanzella et all |2005|. 120081) and VIMOS 
dLe Fevre et all |2004| ; IPopesso et all l2008h spectrographs at the 
VLT. There are 151 spectroscopic redshift estimates of the 199 0.5- 
7 keV selected X-ray sources with HST optical identifications. 

2.4 Ground-based imaging and photometric redshifts 

The spectroscopic observations are complemented by photometric 
redshifts calculated using ground-based imaging of the fields listed 
in TableQ] This provides a redshift (spectroscopic and photometric) 
completeness of 100 per cent for the magnitude limited sub-sample 
used in this paper (see next section for details on sample selec- 
tion). We prefer the ground-based observations over the HST/ ACS 
data for the photometric redshift estimation because they are deeper 
(AEGIS, CDF-North) and/or have more photometric bands, includ- 
ing imaging in the U filter. 

The AEGIS is one of the fields of the deep synoptic Canada- 
France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS). These obser- 
vations cover 1 deg 2 in the Extended Groth Strip in five filters 
(ugriz). We use the CFHTLS data from the T0003 releastJE which 
rearches a limiting magnitude of i ab ~ 26.5 mag. We use the 
photometric redshifts estimated by lllbert et al] |2006) for sources 

1 See 


3 http ://terapix . .php ?idarticle=55 6 . 

Morphologies of X-ray selected AGN hosts 5 

brighter than iab ~ 25 mag. The CFHTLS data overlap fully with 
area surveyed by the HST, thereby providing photometric redshifts 
for all HST sources with iAB < 25 mag. 

Deep multiwavelength imaging (UBVRIz) in the CDF- 
North has been presented by Capak et al. (2004). These observa- 
tions cover about 0.2 deg 2 and extend beyond the CDF-North field 
of view. In this study we use the i?-band selected sample compris- 
ing 47 45 1 sources to the limit Rab ~ 26.6 mag (5a). Photometric 

redshi fts using these data have been presented by Georgakakis et al 
( 2007 ) using the the methods described by Ro wan-Robinson et al 
20051120081) . 

Ground-based photometric observations in 17 narrow and 
broad band filters have been obtained in an area of 1 de e 2 centered 
on th e CDF-South as part of the COMBO-17 survey iwolf et al] 
l2004h . Although these observations are not as deep as the HST pho- 
tometry the large number of filter s provides excelle nt photometric 
redshift estimates to R fa 24 mag dWolf et alj|2004l) . 

Figure [2] compares photometric with spectroscopic redshift 
estimates for X-ray sources in the CDF-South, CDF-North and 
AEGIS. Catastrophic redshifts, defined as those with (z spec — 
z p hot)/(l + z spec ) > 0.15, represent 13, 16 and 32 per cent of the 
photometric redshift determinations of X-ray sources in the CDF- 
South, CDF-North and AEGIS, respectively. The accuracy of the 
photometric redshifts is estimated by the rms values of the quan- 

tity (z s 

Zphot)/0- + z a p ec ) after excluding catastrophic red- 

shifts. This is estimated 0.04, 0.06 and 0.05 for each of the surveys 
above, respectively. The CFHTLS photometric redshifts of X-ray 
sources suffer the largest catastrophic redshift rate. This is not sur- 
prising as t hese redshifts hav e been estimated using galaxy tem- 
plates only dllbert et al] [20061) and also use a smaller number of 
photometric bands compared to the CDF-North and South photo- 
metric redshifts. 

Uncertainties in the photometric redshifts are expected to have 
only a small impact on the results. As described in the next section, 
in the analysis we use a magnitude-limited sub-sample of X-ray 
sources {Iab < 23 mag for the AEGIS and zab < 24 mag for the 
GOODS fields), for which the spectroscopic redshift completeness 
is about 88 per cent. 


The sample consists of X-ray sources selected in the 0.5-7 keV 
band and in the redshift (photometric or spectroscopic) interval 
z — 0.5 — 1.3. The median redshift of the sample is ~ 0.8 (see 
below), thereby allowing study of AGN hosts close to the peak of 
X-ray luminosity density of the Universe (e.g. Ueda et al. 2003). 

Two main approaches are adopted in the literature for quan- 
tifying the optic al morphology of galaxies. Visual inspection (e.g. 
iBell et al.l2 005) and automated classification schemes, which mea- 
sure morphology-sensitive structural parameters of the light distri- 
bution of galaxies. The latter methods include both non-param etric 
morphology estimators dAbraham et al.ll99d : lLotz et al.l2004l) and 
model fits to the o ptical profile of galaxies (e.g. Pen g et al] 20021 ; 
Simard et "al] |2002l) . These techniques have the advantage of ob- 
jectivity and repeatability of the measurements. However, there are 
also limitations. In the case of AGN for example, the nuclear point 
source can be sufficiently bright to bias the estimation of structural 
parameters of the host galaxy light profile. The AGN light distri- 
bution (usually a point source) has to be modeled accurately and 
then subtracted from the image, before the morphology of the host 






60..-- ' o o ° 

* 8 C 


-k °- * 


** o 



i 1 * 


' -1*4* 
1 * 1* 1 


Z phot 



Figure 2. Photometric against spectroscopic redshift estimates for the X- 
ray sources in the CDF-South (red dots), CDF-North (open blue circles) 
and AEGIS (black stars). The continuous line is the z p f lot = z sp ec rela- 
tion, while the dashed lines correspond to 8z = ±0.2. All sources with 
spectroscopic redshifts are plotted without applying any magnitude limit. 

galaxy is determin ed. Although there has been progress recently in 
this direction (e.g . iKuhlbrodt etafl 120041 ; Isimmons & Urry||2008l; 
iGabor et al]|2008l) . the decomposition of the nuclear point source 
from the host galaxy is not straightforward, especially in the case 
of real galaxies with complex profiles, including disks, bulges, star- 
forming regions, dust lanes, etc. Additionally, non-parametric mor- 
phology estimators typically produce broad morphological classes. 
Irregular/interacting systems for example, maybe be hard to dis- 
criminate from late-type disk galaxies with bright star-forming re- 
gions superimposed on their spiral arms. It is also unclear how 
methods that fit models (e.g. Sersic function) to the galaxy light 
profile treat irregular or interacting galaxies and whether they can 

isolate such systems. 

Eyeballing has issues of its own (e.g. lLotz et al]|2008al) . but 
is best suited to this study which requires discrimination between 
spirals, bulges and irregular/interacting systems. Also, the presence 
of a photometrically important bulge or nuclear point source may 
bias automated morphological classification schemes against disks, 
even if they are large and obvious to the eye. We therefore choose 
to proceed with visual inspection of the HST images of X-ray AGN 
to classify them into 4 groups, disks (i.e. spirals), early-types (i.e. 
bulge dominated), peculiar/interacting and point sources. The lat- 
ter class includes systems where the central AGN outshines the 
host galaxy and therefore morphological classification is not pos- 
sible. This type of sources pose a challenge for any method that 
attempts to determine the light distribution of the underlying AGN 
host galaxy. The morphological classes have been determined in- 
dependently by three classifiers (AG, ESL, ALC). In the analysis 
that follows we apply equal weights to each of the three indepen- 
dent classifications. We caution that faint or red disk-dominated 
sources may be misclassified as early-type hosts, thereby introduc- 
ing a systematic bias against disks in our visual morphological clas- 
sification. However, comparison with the classifications based on 
the Sersic index suggests that this bias is not affecting the results 
and conlcusions (see section 5). 

6 Georgakakis et al. 

60 F- 1 — I — 1 — 1 — 1 — I — ' 
p Point sources 



u 60 

X) 40 

| 20 

a 60 
2 40 
o 20 


4v / /</ / A//X//X. 



I 1 H 

- Disks 


/A/ / a/ s A i_ 

41 42 43 44 45 
logL x (0.5-10 keV) (erg/s) 

Figure 4. The X-ray luminosity distribution of X-ray selected AGN in the 
redshift interval 0.5 < z < 1.3 as a function of host galaxy morphology. 

We have empirically determined that reliable morphological 
classes are possible to Iab = 23 mag for the AEGIS and zab = 
24 mag for the deeper GOODS HST observations. Therefore, in 
the analysis that follows we use a magnitude-limited subsample 
of 454 (CDF-N: 156; CDF-S: 130; AEGIS: 168) X-ray sources 
brighter than Iab = 23 and zab = 24 mag for the AEGIS and the 
GOODS fields respectively. This choice of magnitude limits has 
the additional advantage of high spectroscopic redshift complete- 
ness, thereby minimising the use of photometric redshifts. Secure 
spectroscopic redshifts are available for 398 of the 454 sources, 
of which 7 are Galactic stars. We use photometric redshifts for 56 
sources only (CDF-N: 14; CDF-S: 13; AEGIS: 29) and therefore 
uncertainties in the estimation of photometric redshifts have a small 
impact on the results. If we further constrain the sample to the red- 
shift interval z = 0.5 — 1.3 the total number of X-ray sources 
is 266 (median redshift 0.8). About 30 per cent of the sources in 
that sample have been assigned different morphological classifica- 
tions by the three independent classifiers. We have tested that these 
differences do not affect the results and conclusions of the paper. 
In the next section for example, the X-ray luminosity function for 
different host galaxy morphological types is estimated. It is found 
that the X-ray luminosity functions for the 3 independent morpho- 
logical classifications agree within the la Poisson uncertainty. Ex- 
amples of the HST images of X-ray sources classified as spirals, 
bulges and peculiars/interacting are shown in Figure(3] 


The binned X-ray luminosity functio n is derived us ing the stan- 
dard non-parametric 1/V max method (Schmidt 1968). In this cal- 
culation we take into account the X-ray selection function, parame- 
terised by the X-ray area curve, and the optical magnitude limit for 
morphological classification. The luminosity function, <j>, in loga- 
rithmic luminosity bins, dlog L, is estimated from the relation 

>diogL = 

where V ma x,i(Lx, M, z) is the maximum comoving volume for 
which the source i with X-ray luminosity Lx, absolute optical 
magnitude M and redshift z, satisfies the sample selection criteria, 
i.e. redshift range, apparent optical magnitude cutoff for morpho- 
logical classification and X-ray flux limit. The maximum comoving 
volume is estimated from the relation 

c r 2 -2 dV 
V m ax,i(Lx, M, z) = — / £l(L x ,z) — dzdL, 
no Ai az 


where dV/dz is the volume element per redshift interval dz. The 
integration limits are zl = zl and z2 = rnin(z optica i, zu), where 
we have defined zl, zu the lower and upper redshift limits of the 
sample and z ptical is the redshift at which the source will become 
fainter than the optical magnitude cutoff for morphological classifi- 
cation. Q(Lx, z) is the solid angle of the X-ray survey available to 
a source with luminosity Lx at a redshift z (corresponding to a flux 
fx in the X-ray area curve). The uncertainty of a given luminosity 
bin is 

= E 


V max ,i(L x ,M,z) 


V ma x,i(L X ,M, z) ' 


In addition to the Poisson uncertainties above, differences among 
the morphological classes determined by the three independent 
classifiers are also accounted for in the error budget. We perform 
1000 experiments in which the XLF is determined by randomly 
choosing for each source one of the three morphological types. This 
calculation provides for each luminosity bin an estimate of the la 
rms of the XLF because of uncertainties in the morphological clas- 
sifications. This is then added quadratically to the Poisson errors 
above. We note however, that Poisson errors typically dominate the 

In order to convert absolute to apparent optical magnitude 
for the 1/Vmax calculaton, optical k-corrections for both galaxy 
and QSO templates are used depending on the source morpho- 
logical classification. For the early, disk and peculiar classes we 
adopt respectively the E/S0, Scd and Im galaxy type templates of 
IColeman et alj dl980h . whil e for point sources we u se the SDSS 
composite QSO spectrum of Vanden Berk et ai]d200lh . For AEGIS 
sources the optical k-corrections are estimated for the F814W fil- 
ter, while for CDF-North and South X-ray AGN the F850LP filter 
is used in the calculations. 

The X-ray luminosities in the 0.5-10keV band are corrected 
for obscuration. The hardness ratio, HR, estimated in the 0.5-2 and 
2-7 keV bands, is used to determine the column density, Nh, of 
individual sources assuming an intrinsic power-law X-ra y spec- 
trum with index T = 1.9 (e.g. iNandra & Pounds! 1 19941) . These 
column densities are then used to correct the observed Lx for ab- 
sorption. We caution that for unobscured sources the assumption of 
r = 1.4 in section 2 overstimates the fluxes and hence the lumi- 
nosities by about 30 per cent or A log Lx =0.1. This effect there- 
fore has only a minor impact on the estimated Lx (0.5 — 10 keV). 
Additionally, unobscured sources (Nh < 10 22 cm -2 ) are only a 
small fraction of the X-ray population a t the depths of the CDF- 
North/South (as 20%:lAkvlas et alj2006h and the AEGIS (« 40%; 
Georgakakis et ai] |2006l) . When estimating the X-ray k-correction 
of individual sources for the 1 / V ma x calculation we also take into 
account the intrinsic source Nh by adopting an absorbed power- 
law spectral energy distribution with T = 1.9 and photoelectric 
absorp tion cross sections as described bv lMorrison & McCammonl 


19831) for solar metallicity. 

Morphologies of X-ray selected AGN hosts 7 

,logLx=42 .99, 

logLx=43 .28, 

logLx=44 . 11 

logLx=42 .24, 

logLx=43 . 95, 

logLx=44 . 15, 

logLx=42 . 35, 

logLx=44 . 76 


Figure 3. Examples of the HST true colour images of AGN classified as disks (top row), early-type (middle) and peculiar/interacting (bottom). The X-ray 
luminosity (0.5-10keV) and redshift of each source are also shown. The images are about 5 X 5arcsec in size. 


Figure [4] plots the X-ray luminosity distribution of different AGN 
host galaxy morphological types. In agreement with previous stud- 
ies, early-type bulge-dominated galaxies are the largest group, 
contributing 42 ± 4 per cent of the overall AGN population. 
These systems are either m ajor merger remnant s observed after 
the peak of the activity (e.g. iHopkins et al. I l2006h or galaxies that 
have recently accreted cold gas, through minor interactions, which 
has resulted in the re-act ivation of the SMBH at their centres 
(e.g. lKhalatvan et al] |2008). Alternative models for the fuelling of 
the SMBH in early type galaxies inlc ude recycled gas from dy- 
ing stars (e.g. Iciotti & Ostr iker 2007) or accretion from a cool - 
ing hot halo (e.g. ICrotori et alj|2006t ICattaneo & Tevssieill2007h . 
iGeorga kakis et al. (2008b) have shown that the Asymmetry param- 
eter ( I Abraham et al.|[l996t) distribution of X-ray AGN is broader 

compared to optically selected early-type galaxies, suggesting low 
level morphological disturbances. This finding favors the scenario 
where AGN in early type hosts are associated with past merger 
events (minor or major). 

Isolated disk galaxies represent about 28 ± 3 per cent of all 
AGN in Figure|4] These are systems in which the accretion onto the 
SMBH is likely to be triggered either by secular processes or minor 
tidal disruptions. Peculiars are about 20 ± 3 per cent of the AGN in 
our sample. These systems include ongoing major merger events. 
Their fraction may indicate the time-scale that major mergers ca n 
be identified morphologically (e.g. < 10 9 vrs; ILotz et al1 l2008a). 
We caution however, that this fraction provides only a upper limit 
to this time-scale as the group of peculiars may also include Irreg- 
ular galaxies that are not necessarily the product of major mergers. 
Finally, point-like sources in which the light from the central engine 

8 Georgakakis et al. 

outshines the host galaxy and does not allow morphological classi- 
fication are a minority in our sample, 8 ± 2 per cent. As expected 
these sources are more numerous at bright X-ray luminosities. We 
note that the errors in the fractions above include uncertainties in 
the morphological classification of individual sources (see previous 
section) in addition to the Poisson errors. 

The XLF, split into different host galaxy morphological types 
is plotted in Figure [5] and is presented in Table [2] The XLF of all 
AGN in th e sample is in good agreement with the recent deter- 
mination of Bar ger et al.l J2005t) . Figure |6]and Table [3] present the 
fractional contribution of different morphological types to the total 
XLF. Early-type hosts are a major component of the XLF over al- 
most the entire luminosity range, while point sources become dom- 
inant at Lx (0.5 — 10 keV) > 10 44 erg s - . Disk hosts represent 
between 25-30% of the total XLF. The fraction of Peculiar hosts 
to the total XLF shows a weak decreasing trend with increasing 
luminosity, which is, however, within the uncertainties of the data. 

The contribution of different morphological types to the lumi- 
nosity density, x Lx , at z m lis shown in Figures|7]and[8] The re- 
sults are also presented in Tables[2]and[3] Early-type hosts dominate 
the luminosity density up to Lx(0.5 — lOkeV) = 10 44 ergs -1 . 
Above this limit point-like sources, i.e. QSOs, become the domi- 
nant component of <f> x Lx ■ Disk and peculiar host galaxies repre- 
sent about 1 1-35 per cent of the total AGN luminosity density. 

We have checked how sensitive the results above are to the 
adopted method for determining the morphology of the AGN host 
galaxies. The classifications based on visual inspection are com- 
pared with those determined by fitting a single Sersic function to 
the AGN host gala xy light distributi on (Griffith et al. in prep) us- 
ing the Galfit code l lPeng et alj|2002l) . A cutoff in the Sersic index, 
n — 2.5, is applied to discriminate between disk (n < 2.5) and 
bulge (n > 2.5) dominated galaxies. The Sersic model fits are re- 
liable for systems where the central AGN does not dominate over 
the host galaxy light. This requirement translates to an empirically 
determined (visual inspection of the HST images) X-ray luminos- 
ity cut of Lx(0.5 — lOkeV) ~ 10 44 ergs -1 . The comparison 
between the visual and Sersic index classifications is therefore re- 
stricted to sources with Lx(0.5 — lOkeV) < 10 44 ergs -1 . We 
only consider sources that are visually classified "early" or "disk". 
The class of "peculiars" is excluded because they comprise a large 
fraction of disturbed interacting/merging systems with complex op- 
tical light distributions. "Point" sources are also excluded to avoid 
uncertainties in the Sersic function fits associated with the presence 
of bright emission from the nuclear galaxy regions. The Sersic in- 
deces of both "peculiars" and "point sources" are hard to interpret 
in the context of disk or bulge dominated light profiles. It is found 
that although there is a discrepancy between the two classification 
methods (eyeballing vs Sersic index) for about 30% of the bulge 
and disk-dominated sources in the sample, the main results, e.g. the 
XLF of disks and bulges, are consistent within the la errors and do 
not depend on the adopted method for determining the morphology 
of AGN hosts. 


This paper estimates the space and luminosity density of X-ray se- 
lected AGN as a function of their host galaxy morphologies in an 
attempt to place constraints on the importance of major mergers, 
minor interactions and secular evolution to the accretion density of 
the Universe at z f« 1. In the standard view of major gaseous merg- 
ers the disks of the participating galaxies are destroyed to form an 

n I n 
All AGN 








, | i | , 
•it point sources- 
A peculiar 
O early type 
• disks 

42 43 44 45 
log L x (0.5-10 keV) (ergs- 1 ) 

Figure 5. The 0.5-10keV X-ray luminosity function for different host 
galaxy types. Stars (green) correspond to point sources, open triangles 
(cyan) are peculiar systems, open circles (red) are for early-type hosts and 
filled circles (blue) correspond to disk galaxies. For clarity triangles are off- 
set horizontally by -0.1 dex in logLx, while stars and filled circles are 
offset by +0. 1 dex. The filled squares (black) represent the total X-ray lumi- 
nosity function, independent of host galaxy type. This is compared with the 
dashed line, which is the Barger et al.(2005) XLF at z = 0.8 (the median 
redshift of the sample) estimated in the 2-8 keV band and converted to the 
0.5-10 keV band assuming a power-law X-ray spectrum with photon index 
r = 1.9. The dotted curve is the "maximal evolution" XLF prediction of 
the stochastic accretion mode of Hopkins & Hernquist (2006) at z = 1. 
This curve is adapted from Figure 6 of Hopkins & Hernquist (2006) adopt- 
ing the Marconi et al. (2004) bolometric corrections. The continuous (blue) 
line is the updated version of the XLF for the stochastic accretion mode (P. 
F. Hopkins priv. communication) estimated using a revised AGN lightcurve, 
which results in more rapid evolution of the AGN emission after the peak 
of the accretion (see text for more details). 

elliptical remnant. In this picture, disk hosts therefore indicate AGN 
fueled by minor interactions or internal instabilities. 

It is found that disk galaxies represent about 25-34 per cent 
of the X-ray AGN number density and 19-35 per cent of the lu- 
minosity density of these systems (i.e. accretion density). These 
fractions are also almost independent of X -ray luminosity up to 
Lx(0 .5 - 10) w 10 45 ergs -1 . Recently. IHopkins & Hemquistl 
(2006) have developed a model for the stochastic fueling of SMBHs 
via e.g. bar instabilities or minor interactions. In their model this 
accretion mode produces relatively low luminosity AGN, while the 
bulk of the more luminous active SMBH are the result of major 
mergers. Figure [5] compar es our results with the max imal X-ray 
luminosity function of the IHopkins & Hernq uist (2006) stochastic 
accretion mode (dotted line). This model predicts a large number 
of low luminosity AGN, which can potentially explain the entire 
XLF below » 10 43 ergs -1 . Also plotted in Figure|5]is an updated 
version of the XLF for the stochastic accretion mode (P. F. Hopkins 
priv. communication; continuous line) in whi ch the AGN lightcurve 
decay s more rapidly than what is assumed bv lHopkins & Hernquist 
(2006), in agreement with recent simulations (e.g. lYounger et all 
1200 a) and observations of the Eddin gton ratio distribution of low 
redshift AGN in the SDSS (e.g. IHopkins & Hemquistl l2008bl) . 
More quantitatively, in the work by IHopkins & Hemquistl (2006) 

Morphologies of X-ray selected AGN hosts 9 

Table 2. AGN XLF and luminosity density as a function of morphological type 

logLx log</>(£x) l °g{ L X H^x)) 

(orgs -1 ) (xl0~ 6 Mpc~ 3 ) (xl() 37 erg s -1 Mpc -3 ) 

disk early peculiar point disk early peculiar point 




















1.12 ± 0.16 

-0.91 ± 0.97 




















1.01 ± 0.2 

0.42 ± 0.25 




















1.68 ± 0.13 

1.41 ± 0.19 




















1.58 ± 0.40 

2.26 ± 0.16 





1.85 ± 0.43 

The columns are: (1): X-ray luminosity interval; (2): logarithm of XLF in units of X 10 Mpc for disks, early-type, peculiar and point sources; (3) luminosity density in units of 
Xl0 37 ergs^ 1 Mpc~ 3 for the morphological classes above. 

Table 3. Fractional contribution of different morphological types to the total AGN XLF and luminosity density 

log Lx fraction of <j>t tal (Lx ) fraction of Lx 4>total ( ^ X ) 
(orgs -1 ) 

disk early peculiar point disk early peculiar point 

4H2 0.28 ± 0.12 0.30 ± 0.10 0.41 ± 0.22 0.001 ± 0.001 0.29 ± 00.13 0.36 ±0.11 0.33 ± 0.12 0.002 ± 0.006 

42^43 0.34 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.11 0.16 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 00.11 0.49 ±0.15 0.12 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.01 

43^44 0.29 ± 0.10 0.47 ±0.10 0.17 ± 0.06 0.04 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 00.09 0.48 ±0.11 0.15 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.03 

44-^45 0.25 ±0.11 0.21 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.05 0.47 ±0.15 0.19 ± 00.09 0.15 ± 0.09 0.11 ± 0.10 0.53 ± 0.20 

45^46 - 1.00 ± 1.00 - 1.00 ± 1.00 

41^15 0.30 ± 0.09 0.35 ± 0.07 0.34 ±0.15 0.010 ± 0.005 0.23 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.06 0.13 ± 0.05 0.33 ± 0.12 

The columns are: (1): X-ray luminosity interval; (2): fractional contribution to the XLF for disks, early-type, peculiar and point sources; (3) fractional contribution to the luminosity density for the morphological 
classes above. 

' I 1 I ' 

point sources 
A peculiar 
O early type 
• disks 



42 43 44 45 
log L x (0.5-10 keV) (ergs" 1 ) 










1 | l | l | l | l | 

All sources point sources 
A peculiar 
O early type 
• disks 

39 - 

* 38 










42 43 44 45 46 
log LJO.5-10 keV) (ergs" 1 ) 

Figure 6. The 0.5-10keV X-ray luminosity function for different host 
galaxy types normalised to the total XLF. The vertical axis measures the 
contribution of different galaxy types to the XLF. The symbols are the same 
as in Figure|5] 

the AGN lightcurve declines with time, t, as L oc with 
P — 0.6, while in the revised curve shown in the figure f) = 1.5. 
The updated model reproduces the overall shape of the observed 
AGN XLF of disk galaxies but lies below the observations. Also, 
both models of the stochastic AGN accretion mode shown in Fig- 
ure [5] underpredict the number density of AGN in disk galaxies at 
bright luminosities, > 10 44 ergs _1 . This suggests that bar insta- 
bilities and minor i nteractions are more efficient in producing pow- 
erful AGN than the Hopkins & Hernquist (2006) model predicts. 
Alternatively, one might argue that a fraction of the X-ray 

Figure 7. The 0.5-10keV X-ray luminosity density for different host galaxy 
types. The symbols and curves are the same as in Figure|5] 

AGN in disk hosts represent major merger events. Recent simu- 
lations indeed show that under certain conditions disks can sur- 
vive or reform after a major merger. Some authors show that the 
formation of a remnant with a large disk requires very high cold 
gas fractions (> 50 per cent in mass) in the progenitors (e.g. 
ISpringel & Hernquistl I200II ; iHopkins et alj|2008l) . which may be 
typical of high redshift (z > 2) objects. Others show that cold 
gas flowing onto the remnant from Mpc scales can quickly re- 
form a disk ev en if the progenitors ha ve moderate amounts of cold 
gas reservoirs dGovernato etaI1l2008l) . At the same time however, 
it is also argued that the conditions that lead to the formation of 
a disk merger remnant are not associated with substantial SMBH 

10 Georgakakis et al. 
















point sources 
A peculiar 
O early type 
• disks 

s I 



42 43 44 45 46 
log L x (0.5-10 keV) (ergs" 1 ) 

pie) are likely to be the products of major mergers. Studies of such 
sources in the nearby Universe have re vealed that some of them ar e 
hosted by non-interacting spirals (e.g. ICanalizo & Stocktonll200lh . 
while more recent observations suggest that a bout 30 per cent o f 
QSOs at low redshift are in disk galaxies (e.g. iGuvon et alj|2003> . 
Therefore, the fraction of AGN associated with early-type galaxies, 
peculiars and point sources is an upper limit to the contribution of 
major mergers to the accretion density. 

Recent studies on star-forming galaxies also downplay the 
contribution of major mergers to the evolution of these systems 
since z « 1 ^Melbourne et alj|2005l ; iBell et al.ll20ol ; lElbaz et all 
120071: iBuat et alj|2008l) . It is found that about half of the starburst 
population at these redshifts is associated with spirals, underlining 
the importance of minor interactions and bar instabilities in galaxy 
evolution. If the build-up of the stellar mass of g alaxies and the 
growth of SMBH at their centre s are related (e.g. iGebhardt et all 
l2000l : iFerrarese & Merrittl i2000) then the findings above support 
the idea that a potentially large fraction of the AGN at fa 1 are 
triggered by processes other than major mergers. 

Figure 8. The fractional contribution of different AGN host galaxy mor- 
phological types to the 0.5-10keV X-ray luminosity density. The symbols 
are the same as in Figure|5] 

growth (e.g. iHopkins & Hemquistl 2008al). T he dark matter halo 
of the simulation of Governato et alj 1 20081) for example, has a 
mass of < 10 12 M©, while X-ray AGN h ave been shown to re- 
side in halos more massive than that (e.g. [S ilverman et al. 2008a; 
iGilli et alJl2003 ; ICoil et afll2009l : Iffickox et al.ll2009l) . where cold 
gas flows are expected to be s u ppressed because of shock heating 
(e.g. iDekel & Birnboiml 120061 : Icroton et alj 12006,: ICattaneo et all 
120071) , Additionally, in the simulation of iGovernato etalj J2008h 
the black hole mass of the merger remnant at z — is expected 
to be 4 x 10 7 MQ, assuming the relatio n between SMBH mass 
and bulge mass of lHaring & Rixl d2004l) . while X-ray AGN at 
z » 1 are b elieved to be associated with black holes more massive 
than that dBabic et alj|2007, ; iBundv et alj|2008l; ICoil et alj|2009l ; 
Iffickox et al.l2009l e.g.). AGN in disk hosts therefore pose a strong 
constraint on the fraction of SMBHs that are fueled by mechanisms 
other than major mergers. Cosmological simulations of galaxy for- 
mation and SMBH growth will need to reproduce the observed lu- 
minosity distribution of AGN in spirals by invoking either minor 
interactions, bar instabilities or the reformation of disks in major 

If AGN in disk galaxies are systems where the accretion on the 
SMBH is triggered by secular evolution or minor tidal disruptions 
then their estimated fraction to the XLF represents only a lower 
limit to the contribution of these SMBH fueling processes to the 
accretion density at z ~ 1. Although bulge-dominated galaxies are 
likely to be the products of a major merger, the observed nuclear 
activity in these systems may not be associated with this past event. 
The AGN in some early-type galaxies for example, may be fueled 
b y cold gas accretion via minor tidal interactions. The simulations 
o flKhalatvan et al J d2008t) demonstrate that this process can activate 
the SMBH of early-type galaxies, thereby p roducing AGN with lu- 
minosities similar to those probed here. ICiotti & Ostrikeil d2007l) 
also showed that secular evolution in isolated elliptical galaxies 
could drive recycled gas to the central regions, thereby producing 
recursive nuclear starbursts and accretion onto the SMBH. Simi- 
larly, not all QSOs (Lx > 10 44 ergs -1 ; point sources in our sam- 


The authors wish to thank the anonymous referee for pro- 
viding constructive comments and suggestions that sig- 
nificantly improved this paper and Philip F. Hopkins for 
making available unpublished results on the XLF for the 
stochastic fuelling of SMBH. The authors acknowledge 
use of data from the Team Keck Treasury Redshift Survey 
(TKRS;! and the 
ESO/GOODS project which is based on observations carried 
out at the Very Large Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory 
under Program IDs: 170.A-0788, 074.A-0709, 275.A-5060 and 
171.A-3045. Support for this work was provided by NASA through 
the Spitzer Space Telescope Fellowship Program. The source cata- 
logues used in the paper are available at 

Based on observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, 
a joint project of CFHT and CEA/DAPNIA, at the Canada-France- 
Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) which is operated by the National Re- 
search Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Sci- 
ences de l'Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scien- 
tifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii. This work 
is based in part on data products produced at TERAPIX and the 
Canadian Astronomy Data Centre as part of the Canada-France- 
Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey, a collaborative project of NRC 
and CNRS. 


Abraham R. G., van den Bergh S., Glazebrook K., Ellis R. S., 

Santiago B. X., Surma P., Griffiths R. E., 1996, ApJS, 107, 1 
Aird J., Nandra K., Georgakakis A., Laird E. S., Steidel C. C, 

Sharon C, 2008, MNRAS, 387, 883 
Akylas A., Georgantopoulos I., Georgakakis A., Kitsionas S., 

Hatziminaoglou E., 2006, A&A, 459, 693 
Babic A., Miller L., Jarvis M. J., Turner T. J., Alexander D. M., 

Croom S. M., 2007, A&A, 474, 755 
Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., Capak P., Alexander D. M., Bauer 

F. E., Fernandez E., Brandt W. N, Garmire G. P., Hornschemeier 

A. E., 2003, AJ, 126, 632 

Morphologies of X-ray selected AGN hosts 1 1 

Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., Mushotzky R. R, Yang Y, Wang W.-H., 

Steffen A. T., Capak P., 2005, AJ, 129, 578 
Barnes J. E., Hernquist L., 1996, ApJ, 471, 115 
Barnes J. E., Hernquist L. E., 1991, ApJ, 370, L65 
Bell E. E, et al., 2005, ApJ, 625, 23 

Bennert N., Canalizo G., Jungwiert B., Stockton A., Schweizer E, 

Peng C. Y, Lacy M., 2008, ApJ, 677, 846 
Borne K. D., Bushouse H., Lucas R. A., Colina L., 2000, ApJ, 

529, L77 

Brinchmann J., et al., 1998, ApJ, 499, 1 12 
Brusa M., et al., 2008, ArXiv0809.2513 

Buat V., Boissier S., Burgarella D., Takeuchi T. T., Le Floc'h E., 
Marcillac D., Huang J., Nagashima M., Enoki M., 2008, A&A, 
483, 107 

Bundy K., et al., 2008, ApJ, 681, 931 

Canalizo G., Bennert N., Jungwiert B., Stockton A., Schweizer E, 

Lacy M., Peng C., 2007, ApJ, 669, 801 
Canalizo G, Stockton A., 2001, ApJ, 555, 719 
Cattaneo A., Blaizot J., Weinberg D. H, Keres D., Colombi S., 

Dave R., Devriendt J., Guiderdoni B., Katz N., 2007, MNRAS, 

377, 63 

Cattaneo A., Teyssier R., 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1547 

Ciliegi P., Zamorani G., Hasinger G., Lehmann I., Szokoly G., 

Wilson G., 2003, A&A, 398, 901 
Ciotti L., Ostriker J. P., 2007, ApJ, 665, 1038 
Coil A. L., et al., 2009, ArXiv0902.036 

Coleman G. D., Wu C.-C, Weedman D. W., 1980, ApJS, 43, 393 

Cowie L. L., Barger A. J., Bautz M. W., Brandt W. N., Garmire 
G. P., 2003, ApJ, 584, L57 

Croton D. J., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1 1 

Davis M., et al., 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumenta- 
tion Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Guhathakurta P., ed., 
Vol. 4834, pp. 161-172 

— , 2007, ApJ, 660, LI 

Dekel A., Birnboim Y, 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2 

Di Matteo T., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, Nature, 433, 604 

Dickinson M., et al., 2004, ApJ, 600, L99 

Elbaz D., et al., 2007, A&A, 468, 33 

Faber S. M., et al., 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumenta- 
tion Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design 
and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, 
lye M., Moorwood A. E M., eds., pp. 1657-1669 

Farrah D., Rowan-Robinson M., Oliver S., Serjeant S., Borne K., 
Lawrence A., Lucas R. A., Bushouse H, Colina L., 2001, MN- 
RAS, 326, 1333 

Ferrarese L., Merritt D., 2000, ApJ, 539, L9 

Franceschini A., Braito V, Persic M., Delia Ceca R., Bassani L., 
Cappi M., Malaguti P., Palumbo G. G. C, Risaliti G., Salvati M., 
Severgnini P., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1181 

Gabor J. M., et al., 2008, ArXiv0809.0309 

Gebhardt K., Bender R., Bower G., Dressier A., Faber S. M., Fil- 
ippenko A. V, Green R., Grillmair C, Ho L. C, Kormendy J., 
Lauer T. R., Magorrian J., Pinkney J., Richstone D., Tremaine 
S., 2000, ApJ, 539, L13 

Georgakakis A., Nandra K., Laird E. S., Aird J., Trichas M., 
2008a, MNRAS, 388, 1205 

Georgakakis A., Rowan-Robinson M., Babbedge T. S. R., Geor- 
gantopoulos I., 2007, MNRAS, 377, 203 

Georgakakis A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 371, 221 

— , 2008b, MNRAS, 385, 2049 

Giavalisco M., et al., 2004, ApJ, 600, L93 

Gilli R., et al., 2008, ArXiv:0810.4769 

Governato E, Brook C. B., Brooks A. M., Mayer L., Willman 
B., Jonsson P., Stilp A. M., Pope L., Christensen C, Wadsley J., 
Quinn T., 2008, arXiv:08 12.0379 

Guyon O., Sanders D. B., Stockton A., 2006, ApJS, 166, 89 

Hiiring N., Rix H.-W., 2004, ApJ, 604, L89 

Hasinger G., 2008, A&A, 490, 905 

Hasinger G., Miyaji T, Schmidt M., 2005, A&A, 441, 417 
Hennawi J. E, et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 1 
Hernquist L., 1989, Nature, 340, 687 
Hickox R. C, Markevitch M., 2006, ApJ, 645, 95 
Hickox R. C, et al., 2009, ArXiv0901.4121 
Ho L. C, Filippenko A. V, Sargent W. L. W., 1997, ApJS, 112, 

Hopkins A. M., Connolly A. J., Szalay A. S., 2000, AJ, 120, 2843 
Hopkins P. E, Cox T. J., Younger J. D., Hernquist L., 2008, 

Hopkins P. E, Hernquist L., 2006, ApJS, 166, 1 
— , 2008a, arXiv:0812.2915 
— , 2008b, ArXiv:0809.3789 

Hopkins P. E, Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Robertson 

B., Springel V, 2006, ApJS, 163, 1 
Ilbert O., et al., 2006, A&A, 457, 841 

Khalatyan A., Cattaneo A., Schramm M., Gottlober S., Steinmetz 

M., Wisotzki L., 2008, MNRAS, 387, 13 
Kuhlbrodt B., Wisotzki L., Jahnke K., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1027 
Laird E. S., et al., 2008, ArXiv0809.1349 
Le Fevre O., et al., 2004, A&A, 428, 1043 

Li C, Kauffmann G, Heckman T. M., White S. D. M., Jing Y. P., 

2008, MNRAS, 385, 1915 
Lilly S. J., Tresse L., Hammer E, Crampton D., Le Fevre O., 1995, 

ApJ, 455, 108 

Lotz J. M., Jonsson P., Cox T. J., Primack J. R., 2008a, 

Lotz J. M., Primack J., Madau P., 2004, AJ, 128, 163 
Lotz J. M., et al., 2008b, ApJ, 672, 177 

Marconi A., Risaliti G., Gilli R., Hunt L. K., Maiolino R., Salvati 

M., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169 
Melbourne J., Koo D. C, Le Floc'h E., 2005, ApJ, 632, L65 
Mignoli M., et al., 2005, A&A, 437, 883 
Morrison R., McCammon D., 1983, ApJ, 270, 1 19 
Myers A. D., Brunner R. J., Richards G. T., Nichol R. C, Schnei- 
der D. P., Bahcall N. A., 2007, ApJ, 658, 99 
Nandra K., Pounds K. A., 1994, MNRAS, 268, 405 
Peng C. Y, Ho L. C, Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2002, AJ, 124, 266 
Pierce C. M., Lotz J. M., Laird E. S., Lin L., Nandra K., Primack 
J. R., Faber S. M., Barmby P., Park S. Q., Willner S. P., Gwyn 
S., Koo D. C, Coil A. L., Cooper M. C, Georgakakis A., Koeke- 
moer A. M., Noeske K. G., Weiner B. J., Willmer C. N. A., 2007, 
ApJ, 660, L19 
Popesso P., et al., 2008, ArXiv0802.2930 

Robertson B., Bullock J. S., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Hernquist L., 

Springel V, Yoshida N., 2006, ApJ, 645, 986 
Rowan-Robinson M., et al., 2005, AJ, 129, 1 183 
— , 2008, MNRAS, 386, 697 

Sanders D. B., Mirabel I. E, 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749 
Schmidt M., 1968, ApJ, 151, 393 

Serber W., Bahcall N., Menard B., Richards G., 2006, ApJ, 643, 

Silverman J. D., et al., 2008a, ArXiv:0812.3402 
— , 2008b, ApJ, 679, 118 

Simard L., Willmer C. N. A., Vogt N. P., Sarajedini V. L., Phillips 

12 Georgakakis et al. 

A. C, Weiner B. J., Koo D. C, Im M., Illingworth G. D., Faber 

S. M., 2002, ApJS, 142, 1 
Simmons B. D., Urry C. M., 2008, ApJ, 683, 644 
Somerville R. S., Hopkins P. R, Cox T. J., Robertson B. E., Hern- 

quist L., 2008, ArXiv0808.1227 
Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, ApJ, 622, L9 
Springel V., et al., 2005, Nature, 435, 629 

Stanway E. R., Bunker A. J., McMahon R. G., Ellis R. S., Treu T., 

McCarthy P. J., 2004a, ApJ, 607, 704 
Stanway E. R., et al., 2004b, ApJ, 604, L13 
Surace J. A., Sanders D. B., Vacca W. D., Veilleux S., Mazzarella 

J. M., 1998, ApJ, 492, 116 
Sutherland W., Saunders W., 1992, MNRAS, 259, 413 
Szokoly G. P., et al., 2004, ApJS, 155, 271 
Ueda Y., Akiyama M., Ohta K., Miyaji T., 2003, ApJ, 598, 886 
Vanden Berk D. E., et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 549 
Vanzella E., et al., 2005, A&A, 434, 53 
— , 2008, A&A, 478, 83 
Vogt N. P., et al., 2005, ApJS, 159, 41 
Weiner B. J„ et al., 2005, ApJ, 620, 595 
Wirth G. D., et al., 2004, AJ, 127, 3121 
Wolf C, et al., 2004, A&A, 421, 913 
York D. G., et al., 2000, AJ, 120, 1579 

Younger J. D., Hopkins P. E, Cox T. J., Hernquist L., 2008, ApJ, 
686, 815