Skip to main content

Full text of "Neutrino oscillations and neutrinoless double-beta decay"

See other formats


DFTT 71/99 
Eiep-ph/99124271 



Neutrino oscillations and neutrinoless double-/? decay 



C. Giunti 

INFN, Sezione di Torino, and Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica, Universitd di Torino, 

Via P. Giuria 1, 1-10125 Torino, Italy 



Abstract 

We consider the scheme with mixing of three neutrinos and a mass hierarchy. 
We shown that, under the natural assumptions that massive neutrinos are 
Majorana particles and there are no unlikely fine-tuned cancellations among 
the contributions of the different neutrino masses, the results of solar neutrino 
experiments imply a lower bound for the effective Majorana mass in neutri- 
noless double-/3 decay. We also discuss briefly neutrinoless double-/3 decay in 
schemes with mixing of four neutrinos. We show that one of them is favored 
by the data. 

Presented at TAUP'99, 6-10 September 1999, College de France, Paris, 
France. 



1 



Typeset using REVTeX 



Neutrino oscillations [T[| have been observed in solar and atmospheric neutrino experi- 
ments. The corresponding neutrino mass-squared differences are 



Am s 2 un ~ 10~ 6 - l(T 4 eV 2 (MSW) , (0.1) 
in the case of MSW transitions, or 

Am 2 un ~ 10- 11 - 10~ 10 eV 2 (VO) , (0.2) 

in the case of vacuum oscillations, and 

Am 2 tm ~Hr 3 -10- 2 eV 2 . (0.3) 

These values of the neutrino mass-squared differences and the mixing required for the ob- 
served solar and atmospheric oscillations are compatible with the simplest and most natural 
scheme with three-neutrino mixing and a mass hierarchy: 

mi « m 2 « ^3 • (0.4) 
> w ' 

This scheme is predicted by the see-saw mechanism IJ, which predicts also that the three 
light massive neutrinos are Majorana particles. In this case neutrinoless double-/^ decay 
(PPov) is possible and its matrix element is proportional to the effective Majorana mass 



iwi 



(0.5) 



where U is the neutrino mixing matrix and the sum is over the contributions of all the mass 
eigenstate neutrinos v k (k = 1,2,3). 

In principle the effective Majorana mass ( p.5|) can be vanishingly small because of can- 
cellations among the contributions of the different mass eigenstates. However, since the 
neutrino masses and the elements of the neutrino mixing matrix are independent quanti- 
ties, if there is a hierarchy of neutrino masses such a cancellation would be the result of 
an unlikely fine-tuning, unless some unknown symmetry is at work. Here we consider the 
possibility that no such symmetry exist and no unlikely fine-tuning operates to suppress the 
effective Majorana mass ( p.5[) 0. In this case we have 

\(m)\ ~ max|(m)|fc , (0.6) 

k 

where \{m)\ k is the absolute value of the contribution of the massive neutrino v k to \(m)\: 

\(m)\ k = \U ek \ 2 m k . (0.7) 

In the following we will estimate the value of using the largest \{m)\ k obtained from 
the results of neutrino oscillation experiments. 



2 



Let us consider first |(ra)|3, which, taking into account that in the three-neutrino scheme 
under consideration m 3 ~ a/ Am^ = a/ Am 2 tm , is given by 

Km)| 3 ^|C/ e3 |VAm2 tm . (0.8) 

Since the results of the CHOOZ experiment || and the Super-Kamiokande atmospheric 
neutrino data j| imply that \U e3 \ 2 is small (|f/ e 3| 2 ^ 5 x 10~ 2 0), the contribution |(m)|3 
to the effective Majorana mass in (3[3q u decay is very small HHfl. The upper bounds for 
| (ttt.) 1 3 as functions of Am 2 tm obtained from the present experimental data are shown in 
Fig. |]. The dash-dotted upper limit has been obtained using the 90% CL exclusion curve of 
the CHOOZ experiment (taking into account |J that \U e3 \ 2 = | ^1 — a/1 — sin 2 2$chooz ) , 

where "#chooz is the two-neutrino mixing angle measured in the CHOOZ experiment), the 
dashed upper bound has been obtained using the results presented in Ref. || of the analysis 
of Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data (at 90% CL) and the solid upper limit, 
that surrounds the shadowed allowed region, has been obtained using the results presented 
in Ref. || of the combined analysis of the CHOOZ and Super-Kamiokande data (at 90% 
CL). The dotted line in Fig. [I] represents the unitarity limit |(m)| 3 < ^/Am^. One can see 
from Fig. [I] that the results of the CHOOZ experiment imply that |(m)|3 < 2.7 x 10 _2 eV, 
the results of the Super-Kamiokande experiment imply that |(m)|3 < 3.8 x 10~ 2 eV, and the 
combination of the results of the two experiments drastically lowers the upper bound to 

\(m)\ 3 < 2.5 x 10" 3 eV. (0.9) 

Since there is no lower bound for | U e3 | 2 from experimental data, | (m) 1 3 could be much smaller 
than the upper bound in Eq. ( p.9|) . 

Hence, the largest contribution to \(m)\ could come from |(7ra)| 2 = \U e 2\ 2 m 2 . In 
the scheme (p.4j ) m 2 ~ a/ Am^ = a/ Am 2 un and, since \U e 3\ 2 is very small, | t/ e 2 1 2 — 

I ^1 — a/1 — sin 2 2i9 sun j ||, where -!? sun is the two-neutrino mixing angle used in the analysis 

of solar neutrino data. Therefore, | (ttt.) 1 2 is given by 

\(m)\ 2 ~ 1 (l - a/1 - sin 2 2tf sun ) y/Am 2 ^ . (0.10) 

Solar neutrino data imply bounds for sin 2 2i9 sun and Am 2 un . In particular the large mixing 
angle MSW solution (LMA) of the solar neutrino problem requires a relatively large Am 2 un 
and a mixing angle -$ sun close to maximal: 

1.2 x 10~ 5 eV 2 < Am 2 un < 3.1 x 10" 4 eV 2 , (0.11) 
0.58 < sin 2 2i9 sun < 1 , (0.12) 

at 99% CL ||. The corresponding allowed range for |(m)|2 as a function of Am 2 un is shown 
in Fig|| (the shadowed region limited by the solid line). The dashed line in Fig.Q represents 
the unitarity limit \(m)\2 < ^ Am 2 un . From Fig.^one can see that the LMA solution of the 
solar neutrino problem implies that 

7.4 x 10~ 4 eV < I (m)\ 2 < 6.0 x 10" 3 eV . (0.13) 



3 



Assuming the absence of fine-tuned cancellations among the contributions of the three neu- 
trino masses to the effective Majorana mass, if \U e s\ 2 is very small and | (m) I3 <C |(m)|2, 
from Eqs.( p.6| ) and ( p,13| ) we obtain 

7 x l(T 4 eV < \(m}\ < 6 x HT 3 eV. (0.14) 

Hence, assuming the absence of an unlikely fine-tuned suppression of |(to)|, in the case of 
the LM A solution of the solar neutrino problem we have obtained a lower bound of about 
7 x 10 _4 eV for the effective Majorana mass in ftj3 0u decay. 

Also the small mixing angle MSW (SMA) and the vacuum oscillation (VO) solutions 
of the solar neutrino problem imply allowed ranges for |(m)|2, but their values are much 
smaller than in the case of the LMA solution. Using the 99% CL allowed regions obtained 
in [10 1 from the analysis of the total rates measured in solar neutrino experiments we have 

5 x 10~ 7 eV < I (m) | 2 < 10~ 5 eV(SMA) , (0.15) 
10~ 6 eV < I (rn) | 2 < 2 x 10~ 5 eV(VO) . (0.16) 

If future PPov experiments will find | (to) | in the range shown in Fig.|^ and future long-baseline 
experiments will obtain a stronger upper bound for |f/ e 3| 2 , it would mean that |(to)|2 gives 
the largest contribution to the effective Majorana mass, favoring the LMA solution of the 
solar neutrino problem. On the other hand, if future (3(]q u experiments will find |(to)| in the 
range shown in Fig.|2] and the SMA or VO solutions of the solar neutrino problem will be 
proved to be correct by future solar neutrino experiments, it would mean that |(to)|3 gives 
the largest contribution to the effective Majorana mass and there is a lower bound for the 
value of |£/e3| 2 - 

Finally, let us consider briefly the two four-neutrino mixing schemes compatible with all 
neutrino oscillation data jl], including the indications in favor of —>■ v e oscillations found 
in the short-baseline (SBL) LSND experiment W\ 



(A)mi < TO2 < rris < 777,4 , (0-17) 



Am | BL 



(B)toi < ni2 < rris < 777,4 • (0.18) 



Am SBL 



Since the mixing of v e with the two massive neutrinos whose mass-squared difference gener- 
ates atmospheric neutrino oscillations is very small JTJ, the contribution of the two "heavy" 
mass eigenstates z/ 3 and to the effective Majorana mass (p.5|) is large in scheme A and 
very small in scheme B. Hence, the effective Majorana mass is expected to be relatively 
large in scheme A and strongly suppressed in scheme B. In particular, in the scheme A the 
SMA solution of the solar neutrino problem implies a value of \{vn)\ larger than the the 
present upper bound obtained in (3(3q v decay experiments |L2] and is, therefore, disfavored. 
Furthermore, since the measured abundances of primordial elements produced in Big-Bang 



Nucleosynthesis is compatible only with the SMA solution of the solar neutrino problem [jT3 
we conclude that the scheme A is disfavored by the present experimental data and there is 
only one four-neutrino mixing scheme supported by all data: scheme B M. 



4 



REFERENCES 



[1] See: S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, and W. Grimus, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43, 1 (1999). 
[2] C. Giunti, |hep-ph/9906275[ (Phys. Rev. D). 

[3] M. Apollonio et al. (CHOOZ Coll.), Phys. Lett. B 466, 415 (1999). 
[4] M. Nakahata, these proceedings. 
[5] G.L. Fogli, these proceedings. 

[6] S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, C.W. Kim and M. Monteno, Phys. Rev. D57, 6981 (1998). 

[7] S.M. Bilenky et al, Phys. Lett. B 465, 193 (1999). 

[8] S.M. Bilenky and C. Giunti, Phys. Lett. B444, 379 (1998). 

[9] Y. Fukuda et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1810 (1999). 
[10] J.N. Bahcall, P.I. Krastev and A.Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D58, 096016 (1998). 
[11] D.H. White (LSND Coll.), Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 77, 207 (1999). 
[12] L. Baudis et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 41 (1999). 

[13] S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, W. Grimus and T. Schwetz, Astropart. Phys. 11, 413 (1999). 



5 




6 




7