# Full text of "Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring and generalized Inonu-Wigner contraction"

## See other formats

July 17, 2001 Revised in January 16, 2003 KEK-TH-769 DAMTP-2001-50 |hep-th/0106114| Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring and generalized Inonii-Wigner contraction Machiko Hatsuda and Makoto Sakaguchi *^ Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuha, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan \ Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CBS OWA, U.K. El-mail: mhatsuda@post.kek.jp, M.Sakaguclii@damtp.cam.ac.uk Abstract We examine a Wess-Zumino term, written in bilinear of superinvariant currents, for a superstring in anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. The standard Inonii-Wigner contraction does not give the correct fiat limit but gives zero. This originates from the fact that the fermionic metric of the super- Poincare group is degenerate. We propose a generalization of the Inonii-Wigner contraction which reduces the super- AdS group to the "nondegenerate" super-Poincare group, therefore it gives a correct fiat limit of this Wess-Zumino term. We also discuss the M-algebra obtained by this generalized Inonii -Wigner contraction from osp(l|32). PACS: ll.30.Pb; 11.25.Yb; ll.25.-w Keywords: Wess-Zumino term; Superalgebra; Anti-de Sitter; group contraction ^Since October, 2001, Theory division, KEK, e-mail: Makoto.Sakaguchi@kek.jp 1 Introduction There has been great interest in studying anti-de Sitter (AdS) superstring actions [H |21 EHHE] motivated by the AdS/CFT correspondence p. The superstring action contains the Wess-Zumino term [7] which is required by the ^-symmetry to match the number of dynamical degrees of freedom for bosons and fermions [S]. The conventional description of the Wess-Zumino term is used in ^ E] , and an alternative description of the Wess- Zumino term, written in bilinear of superinvariant currents, has been proposed for the AdS superstring theories jSJEI and for an AdS superstring toy model ,4J. The conventional description gives its fiat limit straightforwardly as shown in [1 , while the fiat limit of the alternative description does not correspond to the simple group contraction. In fiat space the Wess-Zumino term is given as an integral of the closed super-invariant three form in one dimension higher space [H], Swz = j d^crHs , H, = dB2 . (1.1) The local two form B2 is not super-invariant but pseudo super- invariant. Its geometri- cal interpretation given by [TUj is that H3 is an element of the non-trivial class of the Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology for the supertranslation group. It is also explained that B2 can not be written as the bilinear of the left-invariant (LI) one-forms because of the degeneracy of the fermionic metric of the supertranslation group jTTl . In contrast to the supertranslation group the super-AdS group contains a nondegen- erate group metric, so B2 can be written as the bilinear of the LI Cartan one-forms, L's '-'wz j d'aB2 , B2 = gapL^L^. (1.2) In [23], the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring has been examined and it was shown that the fiat limit of the Wess-Zumino term ()1.2j) for the AdS superstring is not obtained by the usual Inonii-Wigner (IW) contraction |13j. The IW contraction does not lead to the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term for a fiat superstring, but leads to a total derivative term. We consider a group "contraction" such that it leads to the correct flat limit. The IW contraction relates the super-AdS group and the super-Poincare group as follows. The super- AdS algebra generated by J'j^is = {Jab, RPa) and VRQ is given symbolically as [JabiJcv] = 4:T][x)\[aJb]\c] [QajJcv] = —-iQ^Cv)a {Qa,Qf3} = iri^^r,^'^{CVj,s)^p^Jcv , (1-3) where R is the scale parameter representing the radius of the AdS pseudosphere. For the 1 super-AdS group the Killing supermetric of fermions, ^ yQccQf) — J Qc QJ Qfj J J Qc JJ Qp Q ~ '' ^^(3 , l-L-^J can be chosen as the nondegenerate fermionic metric to construct the bilinear form Wess- Zumino term ()1.2p . where Ca/s is an antisymmetric charge conjugation matrix. By the IW contraction we obtain the super-Poincare algebra in — limit [Pa,Pb] = , [Jab,Jcd] = 4?7p|[aJb]|c [Q,Pa] = , [Pa,Jbc] = 27]aibPc] (1-5) {Qa,Qp} = 2i{C^^)^^Pa , [Q,Jab] = -\QlAB . The Killing supermetric for the super-Poincare group vanishes QQc^Qp = , (1.6) so B2 can not be written in the bilinear of the LI one-forms in flat space. It has been shown that even in a flat space the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term can be constructed from the nondegenerate supertranslation group which contains a fermionic center pHIH]: [Pa,Pb] = [Qa,PA] = -^{Z-fA)a J^ {Qa,Qp} = 2i{C^^UPa ^ ' [Zo,,Pa] = [Za,Qp] = , where A is a scale parameter. The nondegenerate group metric can be imposed 2 9q^z^ = -ijCa(3 (1.8) which is not the Killing supermetric, but the invariant group metric with totally antisym- metric structure constants ^. The nondegenerate supertranslation group has been applied to various p-brane systems and the {p + l)-form Wess-Zumino terms are used to analyze these systems |ll[IlllI3[inilIIllIHllinil2niini. Now the question becomes what type of ^The Killing supermetric is given by [Tm-Tn] ^Tk/'^MN ' 9MN ^ f^MLf'^ Nk{-)^ > where {—)^ = +1(— 1) if Tk is an even (odd) generator. 2 JQcQ^Pa = Tr({Qa, QfjjPA) = Tr([PA, Qa]Q(i) = JpaQcQh = i{ClA)al3 Tr [PaPb] = 9PaPb = \vab 2 Tr(Q„Z^) = gg^Zfj = -ijCafs ■ (1.9) 2 group "contraction" gives the nondegenerate super-Poincare group from the super-AdS group? The existence of a scale parameter, R in fll.Hj) and ()1.4|1 and A in fll.7|l and ()1.8|1 . allows one to have a nondegenerate metric. For the usual IW contraction one takes a limit where such parameter dependence is completely washed out, as 1/i? — 0. As a result the fermionic metric becomes degenerate. In order to have the bilinear Wess-Zumino term in a flat limit, equivalently in order to get the nondegenerate super-translation group in a fiat limit, we need a more general IW contraction which keeps some parameter dependence. We present a generalization of the IW contraction that relates the super- AdS group and the nondegenerate super-Poincare group by truncating at a finite order of the parameter expansion of the LI one-forms. The organization of this paper is as follows. In section 2, we propose a generalization of the IW contraction. At first we take SO (3) group as a simple example, and then give an interpretation of the generalized IW contraction. Next we apply this procedure to the super-AdS group, and we show that this generalized IW contraction gives the nondegenerate super-Poincare group as well as the usual super-Poincare group. In section 3, we discuss the M- algebra J3] corresponding to an algebra obtained by this generalized IW contraction from osp(l|32). The last section devoted to a summary and discussions. The original version of this paper, posted on July 17, 2001, includes an analysis of the AdS superstring, which has been published separately in In this revised version, we focus on a generalization of the IW contraction, which has been discussed further in j^EI- 2 Generalized Inonii-Wigner contraction It was shown that the fiat limit of the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term must be taken in such a way that one keeps not only leading terms but also next to leading terms of Cartan one-forms in the 1/ R expansion. The usual IW contraction reduces the super- AdS algebra to the super-Poincare algebra and keeps only leading terms, therefore the fiat limit action becomes the total derivative part. In order to keep the next to leading term, we need to enlarge the "contraction" procedure. In this section we will consider a generalization of the IW contraction in such a way that it keeps the next to leading term and it also includes the original IW contraction. At first we take a simple example, SO (3) which is reduced to ISO (2) with a center by the generalization of the IW contraction. Next we will show that the super- AdS group is reduced to the "nondegenerate" super-Poincare group by the generalization. 3 2.1 Generalized contraction of SO(3) We begin with SO (3) as the simple example of a generalization of the IW contraction. Generators J/, I = {x, y, z) satisfy [JuJj]=eijKJK . (2.1) Parameterizing a group element as g = e'^''^' gives Cartan one-forms = rf0^ + lrf0^0V"^ + ^rf0^(0V-5'V)-^t^0WV + --- ,(2.2) defined by g~~^dg = JjL' and satisfying the Maurer-Cartan (MC) equation, dL^ = ^e^^^L^ . The conventional IW contraction requires rescaling of generators s s and taking the limit s — 0. This corresponds to rescaling parameters, # ^ , 0^ ^ , 0^ ^ 0" , (2.4) and L^'s, — > sL^ , ^ sL^ , L^, and then taking the s — >■ limit. This procedure is equivalent to keeping only leading terms of L^'s in s-expansion. Now, before taking the limit, we consider the scaling ()2.4|) for 0^'s which implies the following expansion of Cartan one-forms L^'s i=0 CO ly = sLi + s'Ly + ... = ^s'^^'Ly,^, (2.5) 1=0 00 Lo + s'Ll + ■ ■ ■ = s'^Ll^ j=0 where LI = dcj)'' + ]^{d<py(p' -d(p'(py) + ---, ■■■ L\ = rf0?^ + l(rf0^0^-rf0^0^) + ..., ... L'o = d(t>' , (2.6) LI = I(rf0^0?'-rf0?'0^) + l{(ci0^0--d0^0^')0^' + (d0?^0^-d0^ 02^)0?'} + ..., MC equations are satisfied in order by order ,tI _ \ jJKtJ tK (c. rJ^ or equivalently dL'o = (2.8) dL^ = im (2.9) dL\ = LlL'l (2.10) dLl = LIL\ (2.11) The conventional IW contraction keeps only MC equations ()2.8|) - ()2.1Up for Lf , Lq, and corresponding algebra is [Jx,l, Jy,l] = [Jy,l^ Jz,o] = Jx,l [Jzfi^ Jx,l] = Jy,l ■ (2-12) This is the inhomogeneous SO (2); the rotation around the z-axis on the x-y plain remains, but rotations around the x-axis and j/-axis are restricted to infinitesimal values and turn out to be translations in the y and x directions. Next let us consider alternative limit in such a way that not only leading terms, Lf , L^, Lq, but also the next to leading term , L2, are kept. Then survived MC equations are ()2.8j) - ()2.1H) . and corresponding algebra is [Jx,l^ Jy,l\ = Jz,2 [Jy,l^ Jz,o] = Jx,l [Jzfi^ Jx,!] = Jy,l ■ (2.13) The new generator, J^^2, is a central term. This is an intermediate form between the three-dimensional rotation on a two-dimensional sphere and the rotation of the 2;-axis on a x-y fiat plane. Therefore this generalization brings the rotation of the 2;-axis on the x-y plane which has a infinitesimally small curvature. Further generalization is possible as long as the MC equations are consistently maintained. 2.2 Generalized contraction of super- AdS Now let us go back to the problem of the Wess-Zumino term for a AdS superstring. The usual IW contraction reduces the super-AdS group ()1.3|) to the super-Poincare group ()1.5j) . The MC equations for the super- AdS group'^ are DL"^ = il-i^L (2.14) 2 2 ' •^We follow the notation used in P; A = (a, a') (a — 0,1,.. .,4, a' — 5, 6,..., 9), a = a' a" {cJ 1,...,4, a" = 1,...,4), and J= 1,2. 5 where covariant derivative D includes the Lorentz rotation. They are reduced under the IW contraction to those for the super-Poincare algebra DL"^ = DL^ = iL7^L (2.15) DL^^ = . The procedure for keeping the next to leading term of Cartan one-forms is as follows. We expand the Cartan one-forms in s = l/i? as oo oo oo = s^Lf , L^^ = smf , L^- = s'^'/'Lil,/, (2.16) i=l 3=0 fc=0 and then the MC equations are satisfied in each order of R = (2.17) = (2.18) — ^-^1/2 / -^1/2 (2.19) ifi . ^ABtJ (2.20) - e (2.21) where D includes Lorentz rotation. The equations ()2.17|) - ()2.19|) correspond to the super- Poincare algebra (|2.15|) . in other words, leading terms of this expansion correspond to the usual IW contraction. Now we generalize the IW contraction as follows. For an expansion parameter s which is finite before contraction, we expand an element and subtract the redundant part. T{s) = 0."T„ n=0 s / T X N+1 T{s) = T{s) - / d^^'s' — T{s') (2.22) ds To + sTi + ■ ■ ■ + s^Tn The Cartan one-forms ()2.16|) are now subtracted. N AB L j=0 Jo Although the Cartan one-form for the Lorentz generator vanishes for the super-Poincare algebra, we include it in order to clarify the commutation relations of the corresponding superalgebra. 6 ^ ms'Lf = L^-rd^+'sdf+'L^, (2.23) i=i p Taking (A^, M,P + ^) to be (1, 1, |) gives LI Cartan one-forms (fio, f^i, Li, L1/2, sat- isfying p.l7|l - p.2Hl . This procedure can give the correct flat hmit of the AdS superstring. In this subsection we focus on a case A^ = 1,M = 1,P = 1, while more general cases will be discussed in the next subsection. Let us translate the MC equations ()2.17|) - ()2.2H) into (anti) commutation relations of nondegenerate algebra. If we expand the LI Cartan one-form introducing generators as ^ G-^dG = U12QXI2 + ^3/2^3/2 + LiPi + ^rii Ji, (2.24) MC equations ()2.17|) - ()2.21|) turn out to be the nondegenerate superalgebra on E^'"^ x {Q/,i/2,Qj,i/2} = -2^5/j(C7^)PA,i + e,j(C7^^)JAB,i [Q/,i/2,Pa,i] = \Qj^^i2lAeji (2.25) [Q/,1/2, JaB,-]\ = —-Ql,3/2lAB others = , where the Jacobi identity of three Q's requires a tensor central charge which can be always taken as a quotient subgroup. We have obtained the nondegenerate superalgebra from super-AdS algebra using generalized IW contraction. This algebra can be rewritten in 10- dimensional spinor representation^ as {Qi,i/2,Qj,i/2} = -225,j(C7^)Pa,i + (r3)/j(C7^)SA,i [Qi,i/2, (Pa,i + Sa,i)] = '-Ql,3/2lA (2.28) [<52,l/2, (-Pa,! - Sa,i)] = -Q2,3/27A others = , ^We omit the Lorentz generator here. This imphes that the commutation relations corresponding to Lorentz transformations are omitted for simphcity below. ^In the limit R 00, we have obtained superalgebras on E^^"' x E'"^. In order to obtain E^'^ super- algebra, we must recover full generators of the ten-dimensional covariance. This is associated with the replacement of the E^'** x E^ Fierz identity in the Metsaev-Tseytlin notation (7a)'"(j/3(C7^)k^ ls) + lieiABy''iMeC^^'')Ky LS) - (2.26) with the E"'^'^ Fierz identity {hAY''ijp{5l^)K^ LS) + (r37A)'"(j/3(r37^)/f7 LS) = 0. (2.27) In this particular case, Ji is replaced with the F-string charge (S^) in the algebra. 7 where the following cyclic identity {C^aS)IUCi^^)k, ls) + {C^Ar,)\%{C^\,)K, ls) = (2.29) is used and the center can be taken as a quotient subgroup. Of course it is necessary to check the cyclic identity. This procedure may correspond to the similarity transformation in the original IW contraction which is required for the consistency. There are two manners for realizing these algebras: (i) A simple example of realization of the algebra ()2.28j) is that for an open superstring as discussed in jSHj, Qz/2 = j T9' (2.30) Pi = f p , j: = T [ X' . The system is described by only {X"^,pa) and {9°", (a) ^- This realization can be viewed as a description of the nondegenerate group manifold in terms of the AdS superspace. (ii) Another way is to introduce canonical coordinates (^°,n^^o) and {y'^^Py) correspond- ing to and T^A adding to the original variables. This is the case in our previous work |3J 1^ . The canonical generators are expressed as ''The two- form doublet B are written in terms of Cartan one- forms as 1171 [T^ Bns = Li/2CfzL^/2 ~ 2^^'5.i^i' dB^s — *Li(Zi/20'37^i/2) = HmSi Brr = Li/2(TiL^/2 — -^RR,i^'i, cIBrr — iLi{Li/2crijLi/2) — Hrr. (2.31) Parameterizing a group element as G = e^^-^^e^'^^^^ , Cartan one-forms are expressed as — ^^Pa + ^^"^A + L1/2Q1/2 + L3/2Q3/2: = -iiOasj^de), = -iiOau'^de), Ll/2 = de, L3/2 = -'-dx^i-fAor " \{hde){ier - ^(^"^37^^) (^37^)", and B = B^s is expressed in terms of (x, 6) B = -idx{da3jd9) - ^{0-fde){9(T3'yd9). This agrees with the two-form B obtained in (2.26). For RR two-form, 0-3 in H2.32|) is replaced by ci 8 Q3/2 = y (2-32) Pi = p , T. = Py satisfying fTI^ . The algebra ()2.28p gives the group metric such that the metric in fermionic coordinates becomes nondegenerate, fi'Qi/jQg/a = tr(Qi/2Q3/2) 7^ 0. The nondegenerate group manifold is obtained by the generalized IW contraction from the AdS superspace in these ways. 2.3 Sequence of the generalized IW contracted algebras Now let us consider the general integer N, M, P case in ()2.23|) . A set of generators with the highest dimension (A^, M, P + 1/2) form an algebra ^(A^, M, P + 1/2) AB E W'^f-i - E ^^li/27^"e"L/_,_,/, , J = 0, AT 2 ' ^2 1=1 1=0 i-l DLf = ^zL,+i/27^L,_,_i/2 , t = l,...,M, (2.33) 1=0 k 1=1 with AT = M = P, N = M = P + 1, A^ = M + 1 = P + 1 or A^ + l = M = P + 1. For exam- ple, ^(1,1,3/2) is the nondegenerate superalgebra generated by {flo,fli,Li, L1/2, L3/2} discussed in the previous subsection. A generator with the highest dimension is a center of the algebra. In other words, this algebra is nilpotent. This imphes a sequence of algebras 6(0, 0, 0) ^ 5(0. 0. 1) ^ { J- 1 ^ 1, 1) ^ 6(1,1, |) ^ . . . ^(0, 0, 0) = {r^o} : Lorentz algebra ^(0, 1, 0) = {fio, Li} : Poincare algebra ^(0, 1, 1/2) = {fio, Li, L1/2} : the (degenerate) super-Poincare algebra Q{1, 1, 3/2) = {flo, fii, Li, Li/2, L3/2} : the nondegenerate super-Poincare algebra where an arrow indicates an central extension. ^(00) is the original super- AdS algebra after suitable combination of generators. As well as the nondegenerate supertranslation algebra case fl2.25|) . there are two man- ners of describing group manifold of Q{N, M, P + |). (i)The first one is to begin with a super- AdS group manifold and to regard ^(A^, M, P + 1) as a corresponding limit as we have seen above. In this case, the group manifold of 9 ^(A^, M, P + |) is described by AdS supercoordinates (x, 6) dual to (P, Q) (after dividing by Lorentz group) with nontrivial boundary conditions. (ii)The other one is to introduce a coordinate set dual to generators with dimension from to k. The group manifold is parameterized by coordinates dual to them. 3 M-algebra and the contracted osp(l|32) There is another interesting example of this generalized IW contraction. M-algebra [T3] is an eleven dimensional superalgebra generated by generators of supertranslations Qm = {Qa, Pfi), string charge Zm, M2-brane charges Zmn and M5-brane charges Zmi---Ms, where M runs 11-dimensional vector indices and spinor indices M = (/i, a). This algebra is too big enough to include the D=ll N=l supertranslation algebra. In order to examine the structure of the M-algebra, we rather begin with osp(l|32) algebra which is generated by 32 supercharges Qa and 528 sp(32) generators A4a/3, a, /5 = 1, . . . , 32 in spinor indices. They satisfy the following algebra {Qa, Q(3} = Map, [Qa,Mpj] = n^fsQj, [Map,M^5] = ^fSjMaS- (3.1) We denote Cartan one-forms dual to Qa, Ma/3 as 11" and 11"^, respectively and expand as ® /^(n+l/2) n=Q n°/5 = a)—u n=l a/3 (3.2) Cartan one-forms and the dimensions are listed below. generator Qa Paf3 Za MS' dimension 1/2 1 3/2 2 5/2 3 7/2 Cartan one-form Y^a/3 T-ta ^^7/2 A general expansion gives infinite number of generators, but we terminate this sequence at the suitable dimensions in order to focus on the M-algebra. The MC equations for osp(l|32) in each order of R are found to be = 0, 2 3/2 (3.3) 10 forms with his Cartan one-forms, e*^, e'^, cmn, eMi- Ms, which are dual to Qm, Zm, Zmn This corresponds to the M-algebra proposed by Sezginjl5||. if we relate our Cartan one- yartan one-forms, p*^ and Zmi-Ms as n" = nf = eo^p + {C^'T^e^upyp (3.4) etc., or equivalent ly Qa Qa Pep = (C7'^).^P^ + (C'7;.).;3^'^ + ^(C7,.)"^Z^'^ + ^(C'7;.,...;.,)„/3^'^^■■■^^ Z„ = + (7^)^„Z^^ + (7^,...^J„^Z^--'^^^ = + (C7m,,),^Z'^^^^'3 (3.5) etc. In Sezgin's M-algebra the auxiliary generators Z with spinor indices, Z^^^, Z"^ etc., (2) correspond to the higher dimension generators, Za, M^^ etc., in our algebra. Our reduced M-algebra is subalgebra of Sezgin's M-algebra; the number of bosonic generators and fermionic generators are 528 x 3 = 1584 and 32 x 4 = 128 for ours and 664147 ^ and 717088 ^ for Sezgin's M-algebra, respectively. A set of generators with dimension less than k forms an algebra. We denote this as Q{k). Then this reduced M-algebra is ^(7/2). Generator with the highest dimension is a center of the algebra. This algebra contains algebras ^(1) ^ g{3/2) ^ — > g{7/2) ^(1) : super-translation algebra with maximal central extension ^(3/2) : nondegenerate algebra ^(7/2) : reduced M-algebra . One can extend the reduced M-algebra including a dimension 4 generator or a Cartan one-form satisfying the MC equation d< = n-n;^, + i],,m"nf + ^n^/^nf/^ + ^^^..nrnf . (3.6) = 664147. 717088. 11 The extended superalgebra ^(4) is an extension of the reduced M-algebra. g{i/2)^g{A) . (3.7) If it is possible to extend to a superalgebra ^(7/2) • ■ -^(oo) with suitable reducibility of generators analogous to (j3.4p . the asymptotic algebra is osp(l|32). 4 Conclusions and discussions We proposed a generalized IW contraction. While the original IW contraction restricts parameters contracted to infinitesimally small values and keeps leading terms in LI one- forms, this generalization relaxes this restriction in such a way that not only leading terms but also next to leading terms are kept: for the S0(3) case or Lg^g for the super-AdS case. A further extension was also considered where the guiding principle of extension is the MC equations expanded in parameter, ()2.7p for the SO (3) case or ()2.33p for the super-AdS case. A suitable combination of generators should be considered for each contraction in order to satisfy the cyclic identity for supersymmetric theories, as well as the similarity transformation required even in the original IW contraction. This contraction keeps a part of the scale parameter information as expected. This is a kind of a central extension after performing the IW contraction. In this procedure the number of independent generators of Q{N) becomes infinity at — >■ oo which looks different from the number of the original algebra. However this is reasonable in the sense that an infinite number of nilpotent generators is required to represent the homogeneous algebra 9 M AT ( ° 1 ■•■ 0\ N 1 ■•. ■•. 1 yo 7^0 (4.1) Again a suitable finite number of combinations of the infinite number of generators is required. It is interesting that the Wess-Zumino term of the tj^e (jl.ip for a flat superstring is derived from homogeneous supergroup OSp(l|32) by the usual IW contraction shown in the Chern-Simons supergravity context |23j . Acknowledgments We would like to thank Michael B. Green for useful comments on the manuscript and Satoshi Iso for fruitful discussions. M.S. gratefully acknowledges support by Nishina Memorial Foundation. 12 References [1] R.R.Metsaev and A.A.Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 109, |hep-th/9805028 [2] R.Kallosh and J.Rahmfeld, Phys. Lett. B443 (1998) 143, hep-th/9808038^ J.Rahmfeld and A.Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 64014, hep-th/9809164l I.Pesando, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 002, hep-th/9808020; J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1999) 007, l hep-th /9809145: J.Park and S-J.Rey, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1999) 001, hep-th/9812062 J-G. Zhou, Nucl. Phys. B559 (1999) 92, hep-th/9906013, etc. N. Berkovits, M. Bershadsky, T. Hauer, S. Zhukov and B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B567 (2000) 61, hep-th/9907200 M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and M.Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 105024, hep-th/0007009, R.Roiban and W.Siegel, J. High Energy Phys. 0011 (2000) 024, |hep-th/0010104 L.Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, hep-th/9711200» S.S.G ubser, I.R.Klebanov and A.M.Polyakov, Phys.Lett. B248 (1998) 105, |hep^t h/9802109i E.Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253, |hep-th/9802150[ M.B.Green and J.H.Schwarz, Phys. Lett. B136 (1984) 367; Nucl. Phys. B243 (1994) 285. W.Siegel, Phys. Lett. 128B (1983) 397. M.Henneaux and L.Mezincescu, Phys. Lett. 152B (1985) 340. J.A.de Azcarraga and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2579. M.B.Green, Phys. Lett. B223 (1989) 157. W.Siegel, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2799, |hep-t h/940314 4| E.In5nii and E.P.Wigner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 39 (1953) 510, E.Inonii, in "Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics" ed. F.Gursey (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964). E.Bergshoeff and E.Sezgin, Phys. Lett. B354 (1995) 256, |hep-th/9504140[ E.Sezgin, Phys. Lett. B392 (1997) 323, |hep^ /9609086| M.Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 0460 07, |hep-t h/9 8091 13 J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1999) 017, |hep-th/9811143| M.Abe , M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and T.Tokunaga, Nucl. Phys. B553 (1999) 305, |hep-th/9903234t C.Chryssomalakos, J.A.de Azcarraga, J.M.Izquierdo, J.C.Perez Bueno, Nucl. Phys. B567 (2000) 293,|hep-th/9904137, M.Sakaguchi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2000) 019, |hep-th/9909143 M.Hatsuda and M.Sakaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B577 (2000) 183, |hep-th/0001214 13 [21] M.Hatsuda and M.Sakaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B599 (2001) 185, |hep-th/0010189[ [22] J.A.de Azcarraga, J.M.Izquierdo and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 366. [23] H.Nishino and P.Mora, Phys. Lett. B482 (2000) 222, |hep-th/0002077( [24] D.Ohve and E.Witten, Nucl Phys. B78 (1978) 97; E.Witten. Nucl. Phys. B443 (1995) 85, hep-th/95 03124| [25] M. Hatsuda and M. Sakaguchi, "Wess-Zumino term for AdS superstring," Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 045020, hep-th/0205092 [26] J. A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, M. Picon and O. Varela, "Generating Lie and gauge free differential (super) algebras by expanding Maurer-Cartan forms and Chern- Simons supergravity" , ,hep-th/02 12347. 14