July 17, 2001
Revised in January 16, 2003
KEK-TH-769
DAMTP-2001-50
|hep-th/0106114|
Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring
and generalized Inonii-Wigner contraction
Machiko Hatsuda and Makoto Sakaguchi *^
Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK),
Tsukuha, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
\ Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CBS OWA, U.K.
El-mail: mhatsuda@post.kek.jp, M.Sakaguclii@damtp.cam.ac.uk
Abstract
We examine a Wess-Zumino term, written in bilinear of superinvariant currents, for a
superstring in anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. The standard Inonii-Wigner contraction does
not give the correct fiat limit but gives zero. This originates from the fact that the
fermionic metric of the super- Poincare group is degenerate. We propose a generalization of
the Inonii-Wigner contraction which reduces the super- AdS group to the "nondegenerate"
super-Poincare group, therefore it gives a correct fiat limit of this Wess-Zumino term. We
also discuss the M-algebra obtained by this generalized Inonii -Wigner contraction from
osp(l|32).
PACS: ll.30.Pb; 11.25.Yb; ll.25.-w
Keywords: Wess-Zumino term; Superalgebra; Anti-de Sitter; group contraction
^Since October, 2001, Theory division, KEK, e-mail: Makoto.Sakaguchi@kek.jp
1 Introduction
There has been great interest in studying anti-de Sitter (AdS) superstring actions [H |21
EHHE] motivated by the AdS/CFT correspondence p. The superstring action contains
the Wess-Zumino term [7] which is required by the ^-symmetry to match the number of
dynamical degrees of freedom for bosons and fermions [S]. The conventional description
of the Wess-Zumino term is used in ^ E] , and an alternative description of the Wess-
Zumino term, written in bilinear of superinvariant currents, has been proposed for the
AdS superstring theories jSJEI and for an AdS superstring toy model ,4J. The conventional
description gives its fiat limit straightforwardly as shown in [1 , while the fiat limit of the
alternative description does not correspond to the simple group contraction. In fiat space
the Wess-Zumino term is given as an integral of the closed super-invariant three form in
one dimension higher space [H],
Swz = j d^crHs , H, = dB2 . (1.1)
The local two form B2 is not super-invariant but pseudo super- invariant. Its geometri-
cal interpretation given by [TUj is that H3 is an element of the non-trivial class of the
Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology for the supertranslation group. It is also explained that
B2 can not be written as the bilinear of the left-invariant (LI) one-forms because of the
degeneracy of the fermionic metric of the supertranslation group jTTl .
In contrast to the supertranslation group the super-AdS group contains a nondegen-
erate group metric, so B2 can be written as the bilinear of the LI Cartan one-forms, L's
'-'wz
j d'aB2 , B2 = gapL^L^. (1.2)
In [23], the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring has been examined
and it was shown that the fiat limit of the Wess-Zumino term ()1.2j) for the AdS superstring
is not obtained by the usual Inonii-Wigner (IW) contraction |13j. The IW contraction
does not lead to the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term for a fiat superstring, but leads to a
total derivative term. We consider a group "contraction" such that it leads to the correct
flat limit.
The IW contraction relates the super-AdS group and the super-Poincare group as
follows. The super- AdS algebra generated by J'j^is = {Jab, RPa) and VRQ is given
symbolically as
[JabiJcv] = 4:T][x)\[aJb]\c]
[QajJcv] = —-iQ^Cv)a
{Qa,Qf3} = iri^^r,^'^{CVj,s)^p^Jcv , (1-3)
where R is the scale parameter representing the radius of the AdS pseudosphere. For the
1
super-AdS group the Killing supermetric of fermions, ^
yQccQf) — J Qc QJ Qfj J J Qc JJ Qp Q ~ '' ^^(3 , l-L-^J
can be chosen as the nondegenerate fermionic metric to construct the bilinear form Wess-
Zumino term ()1.2p . where Ca/s is an antisymmetric charge conjugation matrix. By the
IW contraction we obtain the super-Poincare algebra in — limit
[Pa,Pb] = , [Jab,Jcd] = 4?7p|[aJb]|c
[Q,Pa] = , [Pa,Jbc] = 27]aibPc] (1-5)
{Qa,Qp} = 2i{C^^)^^Pa , [Q,Jab] = -\QlAB .
The Killing supermetric for the super-Poincare group vanishes
QQc^Qp = , (1.6)
so B2 can not be written in the bilinear of the LI one-forms in flat space.
It has been shown that even in a flat space the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term can
be constructed from the nondegenerate supertranslation group which contains a fermionic
center pHIH]:
[Pa,Pb] =
[Qa,PA] = -^{Z-fA)a J^
{Qa,Qp} = 2i{C^^UPa ^ '
[Zo,,Pa] = [Za,Qp] = ,
where A is a scale parameter. The nondegenerate group metric can be imposed
2
9q^z^ = -ijCa(3 (1.8)
which is not the Killing supermetric, but the invariant group metric with totally antisym-
metric structure constants ^. The nondegenerate supertranslation group has been applied
to various p-brane systems and the {p + l)-form Wess-Zumino terms are used to analyze
these systems |ll[IlllI3[inilIIllIHllinil2niini. Now the question becomes what type of
^The Killing supermetric is given by
[Tm-Tn] ^Tk/'^MN ' 9MN ^ f^MLf'^ Nk{-)^ >
where {—)^ = +1(— 1) if Tk is an even (odd) generator.
2
JQcQ^Pa = Tr({Qa, QfjjPA) = Tr([PA, Qa]Q(i) = JpaQcQh = i{ClA)al3
Tr [PaPb] = 9PaPb = \vab
2
Tr(Q„Z^) = gg^Zfj = -ijCafs ■ (1.9)
2
group "contraction" gives the nondegenerate super-Poincare group from the super-AdS
group?
The existence of a scale parameter, R in fll.Hj) and ()1.4|1 and A in fll.7|l and ()1.8|1 .
allows one to have a nondegenerate metric. For the usual IW contraction one takes a limit
where such parameter dependence is completely washed out, as 1/i? — 0. As a result the
fermionic metric becomes degenerate. In order to have the bilinear Wess-Zumino term in
a flat limit, equivalently in order to get the nondegenerate super-translation group in a fiat
limit, we need a more general IW contraction which keeps some parameter dependence.
We present a generalization of the IW contraction that relates the super- AdS group and
the nondegenerate super-Poincare group by truncating at a finite order of the parameter
expansion of the LI one-forms.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In section 2, we propose a generalization
of the IW contraction. At first we take SO (3) group as a simple example, and then
give an interpretation of the generalized IW contraction. Next we apply this procedure
to the super-AdS group, and we show that this generalized IW contraction gives the
nondegenerate super-Poincare group as well as the usual super-Poincare group. In section
3, we discuss the M- algebra J3] corresponding to an algebra obtained by this generalized
IW contraction from osp(l|32). The last section devoted to a summary and discussions.
The original version of this paper, posted on July 17, 2001, includes an analysis of the
AdS superstring, which has been published separately in In this revised version, we
focus on a generalization of the IW contraction, which has been discussed further in j^EI-
2 Generalized Inonii-Wigner contraction
It was shown that the fiat limit of the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term must be
taken in such a way that one keeps not only leading terms but also next to leading terms
of Cartan one-forms in the 1/ R expansion. The usual IW contraction reduces the super-
AdS algebra to the super-Poincare algebra and keeps only leading terms, therefore the
fiat limit action becomes the total derivative part. In order to keep the next to leading
term, we need to enlarge the "contraction" procedure. In this section we will consider a
generalization of the IW contraction in such a way that it keeps the next to leading term
and it also includes the original IW contraction. At first we take a simple example, SO (3)
which is reduced to ISO (2) with a center by the generalization of the IW contraction. Next
we will show that the super- AdS group is reduced to the "nondegenerate" super-Poincare
group by the generalization.
3
2.1 Generalized contraction of SO(3)
We begin with SO (3) as the simple example of a generalization of the IW contraction.
Generators J/, I = {x, y, z) satisfy
[JuJj]=eijKJK . (2.1)
Parameterizing a group element as g = e'^''^' gives Cartan one-forms
= rf0^ + lrf0^0V"^ + ^rf0^(0V-5'V)-^t^0WV + --- ,(2.2)
defined by g~~^dg = JjL' and satisfying the Maurer-Cartan (MC) equation, dL^ =
^e^^^L^ . The conventional IW contraction requires rescaling of generators
s s
and taking the limit s — 0. This corresponds to rescaling parameters,
# ^ , 0^ ^ , 0^ ^ 0" , (2.4)
and L^'s, — > sL^ , ^ sL^ , L^, and then taking the s — >■ limit. This
procedure is equivalent to keeping only leading terms of L^'s in s-expansion.
Now, before taking the limit, we consider the scaling ()2.4|) for 0^'s which implies the
following expansion of Cartan one-forms L^'s
i=0
CO
ly = sLi + s'Ly + ... = ^s'^^'Ly,^, (2.5)
1=0
00
Lo + s'Ll + ■ ■ ■ = s'^Ll^
j=0
where
LI = dcj)'' + ]^{d<py(p' -d(p'(py) + ---, ■■■
L\ = rf0?^ + l(rf0^0^-rf0^0^) + ..., ...
L'o = d(t>' , (2.6)
LI = I(rf0^0?'-rf0?'0^) + l{(ci0^0--d0^0^')0^' + (d0?^0^-d0^ 02^)0?'} + ...,
MC equations are satisfied in order by order
,tI _ \ jJKtJ tK (c. rJ^
or equivalently
dL'o = (2.8)
dL^ = im (2.9)
dL\ = LlL'l (2.10)
dLl = LIL\ (2.11)
The conventional IW contraction keeps only MC equations ()2.8|) - ()2.1Up for Lf , Lq, and
corresponding algebra is
[Jx,l, Jy,l] =
[Jy,l^ Jz,o] = Jx,l
[Jzfi^ Jx,l] = Jy,l ■ (2-12)
This is the inhomogeneous SO (2); the rotation around the z-axis on the x-y plain remains,
but rotations around the x-axis and j/-axis are restricted to infinitesimal values and turn
out to be translations in the y and x directions.
Next let us consider alternative limit in such a way that not only leading terms,
Lf , L^, Lq, but also the next to leading term , L2, are kept. Then survived MC equations
are ()2.8j) - ()2.1H) . and corresponding algebra is
[Jx,l^ Jy,l\ = Jz,2
[Jy,l^ Jz,o] = Jx,l
[Jzfi^ Jx,!] = Jy,l ■ (2.13)
The new generator, J^^2, is a central term. This is an intermediate form between the
three-dimensional rotation on a two-dimensional sphere and the rotation of the 2;-axis on
a x-y fiat plane. Therefore this generalization brings the rotation of the 2;-axis on the x-y
plane which has a infinitesimally small curvature. Further generalization is possible as
long as the MC equations are consistently maintained.
2.2 Generalized contraction of super- AdS
Now let us go back to the problem of the Wess-Zumino term for a AdS superstring. The
usual IW contraction reduces the super-AdS group ()1.3|) to the super-Poincare group
()1.5j) . The MC equations for the super- AdS group'^ are
DL"^ = il-i^L (2.14)
2 2 '
•^We follow the notation used in P; A = (a, a') (a — 0,1,.. .,4, a' — 5, 6,..., 9), a = a' a" {cJ
1,...,4, a" = 1,...,4), and J= 1,2.
5
where covariant derivative D includes the Lorentz rotation. They are reduced under the
IW contraction to those for the super-Poincare algebra
DL"^ =
DL^ = iL7^L (2.15)
DL^^ = .
The procedure for keeping the next to leading term of Cartan one-forms is as follows.
We expand the Cartan one-forms in s = l/i? as
oo oo oo
= s^Lf , L^^ = smf , L^- = s'^'/'Lil,/, (2.16)
i=l 3=0 fc=0
and then the MC equations are satisfied in each order of R
=
(2.17)
=
(2.18)
— ^-^1/2 / -^1/2
(2.19)
ifi . ^ABtJ
(2.20)
- e
(2.21)
where D includes Lorentz rotation. The equations ()2.17|) - ()2.19|) correspond to the super-
Poincare algebra (|2.15|) . in other words, leading terms of this expansion correspond to the
usual IW contraction.
Now we generalize the IW contraction as follows. For an expansion parameter s which
is finite before contraction, we expand an element and subtract the redundant part.
T{s) = 0."T„
n=0
s / T X N+1
T{s) = T{s) - / d^^'s' — T{s') (2.22)
ds
To + sTi + ■ ■ ■ + s^Tn
The Cartan one-forms ()2.16|) are now subtracted.
N
AB
L
j=0
Jo
Although the Cartan one-form for the Lorentz generator vanishes for the super-Poincare algebra, we
include it in order to clarify the commutation relations of the corresponding superalgebra.
6
^ ms'Lf = L^-rd^+'sdf+'L^, (2.23)
i=i
p
Taking (A^, M,P + ^) to be (1, 1, |) gives LI Cartan one-forms (fio, f^i, Li, L1/2, sat-
isfying p.l7|l - p.2Hl . This procedure can give the correct flat hmit of the AdS superstring.
In this subsection we focus on a case A^ = 1,M = 1,P = 1, while more general cases will
be discussed in the next subsection.
Let us translate the MC equations ()2.17|) - ()2.2H) into (anti) commutation relations of
nondegenerate algebra. If we expand the LI Cartan one-form introducing generators as ^
G-^dG = U12QXI2 + ^3/2^3/2 + LiPi + ^rii Ji, (2.24)
MC equations ()2.17|) - ()2.21|) turn out to be the nondegenerate superalgebra on E^'"^ x
{Q/,i/2,Qj,i/2} = -2^5/j(C7^)PA,i + e,j(C7^^)JAB,i
[Q/,i/2,Pa,i] = \Qj^^i2lAeji (2.25)
[Q/,1/2, JaB,-]\ = —-Ql,3/2lAB
others = ,
where the Jacobi identity of three Q's requires a tensor central charge which can be always
taken as a quotient subgroup. We have obtained the nondegenerate superalgebra from
super-AdS algebra using generalized IW contraction. This algebra can be rewritten in
10- dimensional spinor representation^ as
{Qi,i/2,Qj,i/2} = -225,j(C7^)Pa,i + (r3)/j(C7^)SA,i
[Qi,i/2, (Pa,i + Sa,i)] = '-Ql,3/2lA (2.28)
[<52,l/2, (-Pa,! - Sa,i)] = -Q2,3/27A
others = ,
^We omit the Lorentz generator here. This imphes that the commutation relations corresponding to
Lorentz transformations are omitted for simphcity below.
^In the limit R 00, we have obtained superalgebras on E^^"' x E'"^. In order to obtain E^'^ super-
algebra, we must recover full generators of the ten-dimensional covariance. This is associated with the
replacement of the E^'** x E^ Fierz identity in the Metsaev-Tseytlin notation
(7a)'"(j/3(C7^)k^ ls) + lieiABy''iMeC^^'')Ky LS) - (2.26)
with the E"'^'^ Fierz identity
{hAY''ijp{5l^)K^ LS) + (r37A)'"(j/3(r37^)/f7 LS) = 0. (2.27)
In this particular case, Ji is replaced with the F-string charge (S^) in the algebra.
7
where the following cyclic identity
{C^aS)IUCi^^)k, ls) + {C^Ar,)\%{C^\,)K, ls) = (2.29)
is used and the center can be taken as a quotient subgroup. Of course it is necessary to
check the cyclic identity. This procedure may correspond to the similarity transformation
in the original IW contraction which is required for the consistency.
There are two manners for realizing these algebras:
(i) A simple example of realization of the algebra ()2.28j) is that for an open superstring
as discussed in jSHj,
Qz/2 = j T9' (2.30)
Pi = f p , j: = T [ X' .
The system is described by only {X"^,pa) and {9°", (a) ^- This realization can be viewed
as a description of the nondegenerate group manifold in terms of the AdS superspace.
(ii) Another way is to introduce canonical coordinates (^°,n^^o) and {y'^^Py) correspond-
ing to and T^A adding to the original variables. This is the case in our previous
work |3J 1^ . The canonical generators are expressed as
''The two- form doublet B are written in terms of Cartan one- forms as 1171 [T^
Bns = Li/2CfzL^/2 ~ 2^^'5.i^i' dB^s — *Li(Zi/20'37^i/2) = HmSi
Brr = Li/2(TiL^/2 — -^RR,i^'i, cIBrr — iLi{Li/2crijLi/2) — Hrr.
(2.31)
Parameterizing a group element as G = e^^-^^e^'^^^^ , Cartan one-forms are expressed as
— ^^Pa + ^^"^A + L1/2Q1/2 + L3/2Q3/2:
= -iiOasj^de),
= -iiOau'^de),
Ll/2
= de,
L3/2
= -'-dx^i-fAor " \{hde){ier - ^(^"^37^^) (^37^)",
and B = B^s is expressed
in terms of (x, 6)
B = -idx{da3jd9) - ^{0-fde){9(T3'yd9).
This agrees with the two-form B obtained in (2.26). For RR two-form, 0-3 in H2.32|) is replaced by ci
8
Q3/2 = y (2-32)
Pi = p , T. = Py
satisfying fTI^ .
The algebra ()2.28p gives the group metric such that the metric in fermionic coordinates
becomes nondegenerate, fi'Qi/jQg/a = tr(Qi/2Q3/2) 7^ 0. The nondegenerate group manifold
is obtained by the generalized IW contraction from the AdS superspace in these ways.
2.3 Sequence of the generalized IW contracted algebras
Now let us consider the general integer N, M, P case in ()2.23|) . A set of generators
with the highest dimension (A^, M, P + 1/2) form an algebra ^(A^, M, P + 1/2)
AB
E W'^f-i - E ^^li/27^"e"L/_,_,/, , J = 0, AT
2 ' ^2
1=1 1=0
i-l
DLf = ^zL,+i/27^L,_,_i/2 , t = l,...,M, (2.33)
1=0
k
1=1
with AT = M = P, N = M = P + 1, A^ = M + 1 = P + 1 or A^ + l = M = P + 1. For exam-
ple, ^(1,1,3/2) is the nondegenerate superalgebra generated by {flo,fli,Li, L1/2, L3/2}
discussed in the previous subsection. A generator with the highest dimension is a center of
the algebra. In other words, this algebra is nilpotent. This imphes a sequence of algebras
6(0, 0, 0) ^ 5(0. 0. 1) ^ { J- 1 ^ 1, 1) ^ 6(1,1, |) ^ . . .
^(0, 0, 0) = {r^o} : Lorentz algebra
^(0, 1, 0) = {fio, Li} : Poincare algebra
^(0, 1, 1/2) = {fio, Li, L1/2} : the (degenerate) super-Poincare algebra
Q{1, 1, 3/2) = {flo, fii, Li, Li/2, L3/2} : the nondegenerate super-Poincare algebra
where an arrow indicates an central extension. ^(00) is the original super- AdS algebra
after suitable combination of generators.
As well as the nondegenerate supertranslation algebra case fl2.25|) . there are two man-
ners of describing group manifold of Q{N, M, P + |).
(i)The first one is to begin with a super- AdS group manifold and to regard ^(A^, M, P + 1)
as a corresponding limit as we have seen above. In this case, the group manifold of
9
^(A^, M, P + |) is described by AdS supercoordinates (x, 6) dual to (P, Q) (after dividing
by Lorentz group) with nontrivial boundary conditions.
(ii)The other one is to introduce a coordinate set dual to generators with dimension from
to k. The group manifold is parameterized by coordinates dual to them.
3 M-algebra and the contracted osp(l|32)
There is another interesting example of this generalized IW contraction. M-algebra
[T3] is an eleven dimensional superalgebra generated by generators of supertranslations
Qm = {Qa, Pfi), string charge Zm, M2-brane charges Zmn and M5-brane charges Zmi---Ms,
where M runs 11-dimensional vector indices and spinor indices M = (/i, a). This algebra
is too big enough to include the D=ll N=l supertranslation algebra. In order to examine
the structure of the M-algebra, we rather begin with osp(l|32) algebra which is generated
by 32 supercharges Qa and 528 sp(32) generators A4a/3, a, /5 = 1, . . . , 32 in spinor indices.
They satisfy the following algebra
{Qa, Q(3} = Map, [Qa,Mpj] = n^fsQj, [Map,M^5] = ^fSjMaS- (3.1)
We denote Cartan one-forms dual to Qa, Ma/3 as 11" and 11"^, respectively and expand
as
® /^(n+l/2)
n=Q
n°/5 = a)—u
n=l
a/3
(3.2)
Cartan one-forms and the dimensions are listed below.
generator
Qa
Paf3
Za
MS'
dimension
1/2
1
3/2
2
5/2
3
7/2
Cartan one-form
Y^a/3
T-ta
^^7/2
A general expansion gives infinite number of generators, but we terminate this sequence
at the suitable dimensions in order to focus on the M-algebra.
The MC equations for osp(l|32) in each order of R are found to be
= 0,
2
3/2
(3.3)
10
forms with his Cartan one-forms, e*^, e'^, cmn, eMi- Ms, which are dual to Qm, Zm, Zmn
This corresponds to the M-algebra proposed by Sezginjl5||. if we relate our Cartan one-
yartan one-forms, p*^
and Zmi-Ms as
n" =
nf = eo^p + {C^'T^e^upyp (3.4)
etc., or equivalent ly
Qa Qa
Pep = (C7'^).^P^ + (C'7;.).;3^'^ + ^(C7,.)"^Z^'^ + ^(C'7;.,...;.,)„/3^'^^■■■^^
Z„ = + (7^)^„Z^^ + (7^,...^J„^Z^--'^^^
= + (C7m,,),^Z'^^^^'3 (3.5)
etc. In Sezgin's M-algebra the auxiliary generators Z with spinor indices, Z^^^, Z"^ etc.,
(2)
correspond to the higher dimension generators, Za, M^^ etc., in our algebra. Our reduced
M-algebra is subalgebra of Sezgin's M-algebra; the number of bosonic generators and
fermionic generators are 528 x 3 = 1584 and 32 x 4 = 128 for ours and 664147 ^ and
717088 ^ for Sezgin's M-algebra, respectively.
A set of generators with dimension less than k forms an algebra. We denote this as
Q{k). Then this reduced M-algebra is ^(7/2). Generator with the highest dimension is a
center of the algebra. This algebra contains algebras
^(1) ^ g{3/2) ^ — > g{7/2)
^(1) : super-translation algebra with maximal central extension
^(3/2) : nondegenerate algebra
^(7/2) : reduced M-algebra .
One can extend the reduced M-algebra including a dimension 4 generator or a Cartan
one-form satisfying the MC equation
d< = n-n;^, + i],,m"nf + ^n^/^nf/^ + ^^^..nrnf . (3.6)
= 664147.
717088.
11
The extended superalgebra ^(4) is an extension of the reduced M-algebra.
g{i/2)^g{A) . (3.7)
If it is possible to extend to a superalgebra ^(7/2) • ■ -^(oo) with suitable reducibility of
generators analogous to (j3.4p . the asymptotic algebra is osp(l|32).
4 Conclusions and discussions
We proposed a generalized IW contraction. While the original IW contraction restricts
parameters contracted to infinitesimally small values and keeps leading terms in LI one-
forms, this generalization relaxes this restriction in such a way that not only leading
terms but also next to leading terms are kept: for the S0(3) case or Lg^g for the
super-AdS case. A further extension was also considered where the guiding principle of
extension is the MC equations expanded in parameter, ()2.7p for the SO (3) case or ()2.33p
for the super-AdS case. A suitable combination of generators should be considered for
each contraction in order to satisfy the cyclic identity for supersymmetric theories, as
well as the similarity transformation required even in the original IW contraction. This
contraction keeps a part of the scale parameter information as expected. This is a kind of
a central extension after performing the IW contraction. In this procedure the number of
independent generators of Q{N) becomes infinity at — >■ oo which looks different from
the number of the original algebra. However this is reasonable in the sense that an infinite
number of nilpotent generators is required to represent the homogeneous algebra 9 M
AT
( °
1
■•■ 0\
N
1
■•.
■•. 1
yo
7^0
(4.1)
Again a suitable finite number of combinations of the infinite number of generators is
required. It is interesting that the Wess-Zumino term of the tj^e (jl.ip for a flat superstring
is derived from homogeneous supergroup OSp(l|32) by the usual IW contraction shown
in the Chern-Simons supergravity context |23j .
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Michael B. Green for useful comments on the manuscript
and Satoshi Iso for fruitful discussions. M.S. gratefully acknowledges support by Nishina
Memorial Foundation.
12
References
[1] R.R.Metsaev and A.A.Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 109, |hep-th/9805028
[2] R.Kallosh and J.Rahmfeld, Phys. Lett. B443 (1998) 143, hep-th/9808038^
J.Rahmfeld and A.Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 64014, hep-th/9809164l
I.Pesando, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 002, hep-th/9808020; J. High Energy
Phys. 02 (1999) 007, l hep-th /9809145:
J.Park and S-J.Rey, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1999) 001, hep-th/9812062
J-G. Zhou, Nucl. Phys. B559 (1999) 92, hep-th/9906013, etc.
N. Berkovits, M. Bershadsky, T. Hauer, S. Zhukov and B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys.
B567 (2000) 61, hep-th/9907200
M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and M.Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 105024,
hep-th/0007009,
R.Roiban and W.Siegel, J. High Energy Phys. 0011 (2000) 024, |hep-th/0010104
L.Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, hep-th/9711200»
S.S.G ubser, I.R.Klebanov and A.M.Polyakov, Phys.Lett. B248 (1998) 105,
|hep^t h/9802109i
E.Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253, |hep-th/9802150[
M.B.Green and J.H.Schwarz, Phys. Lett. B136 (1984) 367; Nucl. Phys. B243 (1994)
285.
W.Siegel, Phys. Lett. 128B (1983) 397.
M.Henneaux and L.Mezincescu, Phys. Lett. 152B (1985) 340.
J.A.de Azcarraga and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2579.
M.B.Green, Phys. Lett. B223 (1989) 157.
W.Siegel, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2799, |hep-t h/940314 4|
E.In5nii and E.P.Wigner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 39 (1953) 510,
E.Inonii, in "Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle
Physics" ed. F.Gursey (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964).
E.Bergshoeff and E.Sezgin, Phys. Lett. B354 (1995) 256, |hep-th/9504140[
E.Sezgin, Phys. Lett. B392 (1997) 323, |hep^ /9609086|
M.Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 0460 07, |hep-t h/9 8091 13
J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1999) 017, |hep-th/9811143|
M.Abe , M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and T.Tokunaga, Nucl. Phys. B553 (1999) 305,
|hep-th/9903234t
C.Chryssomalakos, J.A.de Azcarraga, J.M.Izquierdo, J.C.Perez Bueno, Nucl. Phys.
B567 (2000) 293,|hep-th/9904137,
M.Sakaguchi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2000) 019, |hep-th/9909143
M.Hatsuda and M.Sakaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B577 (2000) 183, |hep-th/0001214
13
[21] M.Hatsuda and M.Sakaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B599 (2001) 185, |hep-th/0010189[
[22] J.A.de Azcarraga, J.M.Izquierdo and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 366.
[23] H.Nishino and P.Mora, Phys. Lett. B482 (2000) 222, |hep-th/0002077(
[24] D.Ohve and E.Witten, Nucl Phys. B78 (1978) 97;
E.Witten. Nucl. Phys. B443 (1995) 85, hep-th/95 03124|
[25] M. Hatsuda and M. Sakaguchi, "Wess-Zumino term for AdS superstring," Phys. Rev.
D 66 (2002) 045020, hep-th/0205092
[26] J. A. de Azcarraga, J.M. Izquierdo, M. Picon and O. Varela, "Generating Lie and
gauge free differential (super) algebras by expanding Maurer-Cartan forms and Chern-
Simons supergravity" , ,hep-th/02 12347.
14
