Skip to main content

Full text of "Wess-Zumino term for AdS superstring"

See other formats


May 10, 2002 
KEK-TH-822 



Wess-Zumino term for AdS superstring 



Machiko Hatsuda and Makoto Sakaguchi 

Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan 

E-mail: mhatsuda@post.kek.jp, makoto.sakaguchi@kek.jp 



Abstract 



We examine a bilinear form Wess-Zumino term for a superstring in anti-de Sitter (AdS) 
spaces. This is composed of two parts; a bilinear term in superinvariant currents and 
a total derivative bilinear term which is required for the pseudo-superinvariance of the 
Wess-Zumino term. The covariant supercharge commutator containing a string charge is 
also obtained. 

PACS: 11.30.Pb;11.17.+y;11.25.-w 

Keywords: Wess-Zumino term; Superalgebra; Anti-de Sitter 



1 Introduction 



Superstring actions in anti-de Sitter spaces have been studied in the Green-Schwarz for- 
malism [I], |2|, |3], f|, U motivated by the AdS/CFT correspondence ||. This type of su- 
perstring action contains a Wess-Zumino term [7j which is required by the K-symmetry 
to match the number of dynamical degrees of freedom for bosons and fermions ||. The 
conventional description of the Wess-Zumino term is used in |], Q] while an alternative de- 
scription of the Wess-Zumino term, written in a bilinear form of super invariant currents, 
has been proposed for the AdS superstring theories [[| [| and for an AdS superstring toy 
model The Wess-Zumino term for a superstring in the AdSsxS 5 space is given in 

SW.conventional = / H[ 3 ] = J d 2 (J B , i?[ 3 ] = -iLT^L , (1.1) 

while the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term can be given as [^, |], [10[ 



Swz,[2] = J d a B[ 2 ] , B[ 2 ] = Lt x L (1.2) 

where L and L are super invariant spinor and vector currents respectively Q. Carrying out 
the integral of the Wess-Zumino term in (|1.1|) is complicated for AdS cases, so equations 
of motion and symmetry generators are hardly obtained except in the light-cone gauge 
nj. On the other hand the bilinear form Wess-Zumino term as (|1.2j ) is practical for such 



computations as demonstrated in p2| 



The difference between B of (|1.1|) and Bp] of (|1.2[) is the supersymmetry property. B 



is not superinvariant but pseudo-sup erinvariant, while B< 2 ] is manifestly super invariant. 
The pseudo-superinvariance is necessary to give a topological charge in the superalgebra 
as explained in [I3[ [14j], and topological charges classify Wess-Zumino terms ||15|| . A 



superstring action should contain a pseudo-superinvariant Wess-Zumino term producing 
a correct topological charge, a string charge. 

Now we propose a pseudo-superinvariant two form as a Wess-Zumino term for an AdS 
superstring 

B = B [2] - dd n d9, (1.3) 



which will coincide with the conventional two form B in (|1 . 1| ) . The second term in ( |1.3|) 
is a leading term of Bp] under the flat limit, and it is never obtained from integral of 

the three form J dt(H[ 3 ]\o^ t e) in ( |1 ■ 1| ) ■ So this term should be subtracted in order to be 

B = B. Especially for the computation of topological terms this subtracted term plays 
an essential role. For computations of local quantities such as equations of motion and 
local symmetries, this term does not contribute because it is a surface term of an action. 
In section 2 in order to show B = B we examine the following criteria pj; 

(a) producing the correct three form gauge field strength, H] 3 ] 

1 The charge conjugation matrices are C and C which are both anti-symmetric in the notation Q. 
We denote L aa> i = "> 'C ^ a C' pi a , and y = L a 7a + iL a ' la ,. 



1 



(b) containing the local k invariance 



reducing the correct "flat limit" for the IIB superstring action 



instead of direct computation by performing integral of ( |1 . 1| ) . The conventional descrip- 
tion B gives its flat limit straightforwardly [|IJ], while naive flat limit makes Bp] to be a 
trivial total derivative term. In another word B in the flat limit is differentiated to be 
an element of the non-trivial class of the Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology for the super- 
translation group, while in the flat limit is differentiated to be zero. We will show 
the correct flat limit of the Wess-Zumino term B and suggest the corresponding group 



contraction which maintains the nondegeneracy of the group metric as discussed in JT9 



By using the concrete expression of B in (|1.3|) , we obtain commutators of the super- 
AdSsxS 5 symmetry charges containing a topological string charge in section 3. Topologi- 
cal charges in curved backgrounds for D-branes appearing in the supersymmetry commu- 
tator have been calculated by using BPS equations |TB[ and by using Noether method in 
the static gauge in the lower order of 9 expansion [O, [I8|. The static gauge is not appli- 



cable for a fundamental superstring, since its zero mode is a superparticle moving along 
a null geodesies in the AdS space Jl2| as well as in the flat space. The super-AdSs x S 5 
algebra in the light-cone gauge has been examined in fll| using B where a string charge 
does not show up in the light-cone formalism. In this paper we construct global symmetry 
charges by Neother method in canonical language with neither any approximation nor any 
gauge fixing. A topological string charge in the AdS background is also obtained. 



2 AdS superstring action 



We begin with an action for the AdS superstring with the Wess-Zumino term ( |1.3| ) 
given by 

S = Jd 2 a C = J d 2 a (C + C W z) 

C = - Tv/=^(L?L 0ij + Lf L fl)J ) 
C wz = ±Te i i{ll{T 1 ) I jL J j -d i e I {T 1 ) IJ d j 6 J ) . (2.1) 



The notation is the same as the one used by Metsaev and Tseytlin in [|]] 0. The left- 

1,2), the 



2 For AdS 5 xS 5 case (a = 0,1,..., 4, a' = 5,..., 9) and (a = 1,...,4, a' = 1, 



,4, I 



super- AdS algebra is given by 



[Pa,Pb] = Jab 
[Pa, Jbc] = VabPc ~ VacPb 

[Jab, Jed] = Vbc J ad + 3 terms 

[Ql,P a ] = ^Qjla^JI 
[Ql, Jab] — —oQllab 



{Qaa'I,Q/3P'j} — 5lJ 

+ ejj 



[Pa>,Pb']=-Ja>b> 

[Pa',Jb'd] = Va'b'Pc' - Va'c'Pb' 

[Ja'b',Jc'd'} = Vb'c'Ja'd' + 3 terms 

[Ql,Pa>] = -\Q.Jla'tJI 
[Ql, Ja'b'] = —\Qna'b' 

-2iC' Q / /J /(C7 a ) a/s P„ + 2C ol p{C' 1 a ') a . f} .P a 

C ' a'(3'{C^ ab ) a pJ a b — C a p(C'j a b ) a '0'Ja'b' 



2 



invariant Cartan one-forms of a coset 

SU(2,2|4)/[SO(4,l) x SO(5)] 3 G = G(x, 6) = e xP e 6 



are denned by 



/ 1 l/i i 

G dG = L a P a + L a P a i + -L a J ab + -L a J a > b i + L aa Q aa <i 



= dz M L M A T A = da l L t A T A 



(2.2) 



with T A = {P a , P a i, J ab , J a i b i, Q aa >i}, z M = {x m , 9^} and a 1 = {a , a 1 = a} , and they are 
given by 



/sinC^U 2 
L a = e a + i$-f a f 1 De 

ab _ , ,ab _ a^ab r ( S ^ n ( 2") ^ JJQ 



L ab = ^ab _ Q^ab e 

sin \I/ „ „ 
L = — — DO , 

, „ / sinhx \ , . „ 
e a = dx a +\ 1 dx b T b a 



L a ' = e a ' - # 7 a ' 



alb' _ , ,a'b' 



'sin(|)\ 2 



DO 



w ab + Q^a b e 



sinf^ 2 



D0 



(2.3) 



x 



CO 



ab 



2 l x/2 7 
where [aft] = ab — ba and 

D# = 

W'J 

x 



a^b] 



e «' = dx a' + _ ! j ^' T( / 

2 V x'/2 J 



d - -e( 7 a e a + 1^ e a i) + -( 7 a ^ afe + 7 a 6 ^) 



= (e 7 ^r 7 (^Ta)^J - (H a 0) aa 1 (e la ,)wj 



Vx^ = \/x a x a , x' 



\jx a 'x a > 



r 6 X gX y _ y 

°a i 1 a' — °a' " 



X 



/2 



X 



(2.4) 



2.1 Three form H [3] 

The Cartan one-forms satisfy the following Maurer-Cartan (MC) equations 

' dV = e IJ {^L a la L J - ±L a ' la iL J ) - ±(I/* 7a6 L J + l/ 6 ' 7 a^') 

dL a = ilJ'fL 1 - L b L b a , dL a ' = -tf'f'L 1 - L 6 'l/ 

dL ab = -~L a L b - L ca L 6 c - V^eijL 3 

dL a>b> = L a 'L 6 ' - L cV L 6 ' c , + ZV' b 'e/J^ J 



3 



The first condition (a) is confirmed by taking an exterior derivative of B in ( |1.3| ) using 
the first MC equation and symmetric property of indices | 

dB = dL J (r 1 ) JI L I + L J (T 1 ) JI dL L - d (dHfindO 

= 2L K (r 1 ) KI {e IJ C-L a la L J - V 7a ,£ J ) - l^labL 1 + L^'j^L 1 )} 

= -iL K {Tz) K $l} = H [3] . (2.6) 



The result (|2.6|) is the expected closed three form, dH^ = 



2.2 fi>invariance 

In order to confirm that the second condition (b), the K-invariance, restricts the coefficient 
of the Wess-Zumino term, we set its coefficient to be b as 

S wz = b [ d 2 a TB (2.7) 



where the surface term does not contribute. In order to consider arbitrary variations 5z M , 
it is useful to introduce 

AL A T A = G- l 5G = 5z M L M A T A (2.8) 
e.g. AL a = Sz M Jjf^, AL ab = 5z M L^ b , AL a = Sz M L^. 

The important property of the ^-transformation is given by 

A K L a = A K L a ' = 

A K L a = 2(JU) a . (2.9) 

For a superstring in the general type IIB background the K-variations of Cartan one-forms 
are given by 

5 K L a = D(A K L a ) - ^A K L ab ( lab L) a - -^A^' { la , v L) a 

6 K L a = 2z( A^Zy 7 Q L + L b (A K L b a ) (2.10) 
5 K L a ' = -2(A K L)r'L + L b '(A K L b /) 

with a covariant derivative D 

D(A K L I ) = d{A K L 1 )- V^(A K L J ) + i(L ab 7afe + L a ' b V & 0(A K L a ). 

The k variation of Cq is written as 



-2TiA K L (V^GG l %) Li . (2.11) 



3 {Cj ab ) a p and (ti)jj are symmetric and C' a ,g, is antisymmetric, while two Z/'s are symmetric. 



4 



On the other hand the ^-variation of the Wess-Zumino term ( |2.7| ) is given by 



5 K C WZ = 2ibTA K L (r 3 e%) U . (2.12) 
The factor of the last expression in (|2.11 ) is related to the one in (|2.12|) as 



x —(r% \\u(T:,%) (2.13) 

where 

r ( i) = (2.14) 

satisfying 

(r (1) ) 2 = l ,trr (1) =0. (2.15) 
The ^-variation of the total action becomes 



5 K (C + C WZ ) = 2TtA K L (r (1) + 6) (r 3 e%) U , (2.16) 
and the k parameter must satisfy 

(r ( i) ± 1)k = , for b = ±1 , (2.17) 
where we used the fact (T(i) ± 1)(A K L) = SJ/^r^) ± 1)k . 

2.3 Flat limit 

Now we will examine its "flat limit", the third condition (c). Under the scaling x —>■ 
(1/R)x and 9 -> (1/\^R)9, the Cartan one-form for Q's (|2.3|) are expanded in a power 
series of R 

L 1 = E ( 2 - 18 ) 

r=half integer 

and especially Li/ 2 and L 3 / 2 

L{ /2 = dO (2.19) 

LL 2 = [ - % -{dx a la + idx a ' la ,)e IJ 6 J + i e /J (-7 a ^ J 6 K la de K + 7 a '# J B K la ,dQ K ) 
1 2 6 

+l( 7 * b 0' F 7a6 e*W - 7 a 'V 0* 7 «^e*W) ] (2.20) 

are necessary for examining its flat limit. Corresponding to the expansion of Us, the two 
form Wess-Zumino term Bp] is also expanded. Its leading term becomes total derivative 

^L[ /2 {t x ) u lI /2 = ±<w I (T 1 ) IJ de J = ^d(eW J de J ) , (2.21) 



5 



which is subtracted in our B. The next to leading term becomes the flat space Wess- 
Zumino term 



' ' id9r 3 (dx a j a + idx a ' 7a /)6 l 



R? 

+ l -{{dh a rMe la d6) - (d6r'T 3 6)(9 la ,d9)} 

+ Uide^nOW^iiT^dO) - {dh^'ne^M^de)} } . (2.22) 

o 

The cyclic identity of this space is equal to the Jacobi identity of three Q's, 

X a ^ + 1(3~fa + ^70/3 = (2.23) 

1 la p^{4>) = -5/j{C , ^ /3 ,(C7 a )^(0 i 7 a ) 7 y -C^(C / 7 a ')a'/3'(0 i 7a')77'}eL^ 

= ^e 7J {C;,^(C 7 a6 ) a/3 (0 iC 7a 6 )77' -CapiCY^M^a^y} 

where a runs aa'J and <fi is an arbitrary spinor. The second and third terms of the 
two-form ( 2.22|) are expressed in terms of X as 

J 2nd + 3rd terms of (2.22) = -^23/ ZafhfadB) 6 a d6 (3 6^ 

Zathine) {de a de p e^ -e a de f3 de 1 } , 



1 1 

R^3 



(2.24) 



where a partial integration is performed. On the other hand the terms are also expressed 
in terms of X\ and X 2 as 

2nd + 3rd terms of (2.22) = ^-\{l l (T 1 d)6 a d6 p dd^ - X 2 (T l 9)e° 'd9^ UO 1 } . (2.25) 

R 2 3 

The cyclic identity (|2.23|) multiplied with one 9 and two d6's gives following formula 

x 2a ^{2e a de f3 de l + de a de l3 e l ) = -2T lQ/37 rd^ 7 . (2.26) 

We will pick up a suitable combination of ( 2.24 ) and (|2.25|) in such a way that the second 
and the third terms of (|2.22j ) are rewritten to include only X\ by using the formula ( |2.26| ) 

2nd + 3rd terms of (2.22) 

= A (pD + (l-^)(pl) 

= ^{x la ^e a de p de^ - (i - 2A)x 2a p J e a d6 l3 d8~ t - Ax 2aM de a de p e^} 

A =" i i \l 1 e*d0f , dff' . (2.27) 



6 



Collecting fl2.27| ) and other terms in ( p.22| ) leads to the following expression of the Wess- 
Zumino term B 



B 

2X1/2T1L3/2 



Lt\L — dOridO 



■^(2L 1/2 t 1 L 3/2 ) + o{—] 



[id6T 3 (dx a ^ a + idx a ^ a ')9 

+ l -{(9r ?jl a d9)(9 la d9) - (9r 3l a 'd9)(9 la ,d9)}] 



id9T 3 dx°Ta9 + -{9r 3 T ll d9)(9T h d9)} 



(2.28) 



where a runs both a and a'. The l/i? 2 -part is the two-form Wess-Zumino term for a 
superstring in a flat space. However this L 3 / 2 can not be preserved by the conventional 
IW contraction where only L1/2 is preserved. In order to define the WZ term consistently 
even after IW contractions, new limiting procedure is required. 



3 Super- AdS charges and string charge 

Now we will compute Noether charges for the Super-AdSsxS 5 space and their com- 
mutators. The total derivative term which is subtracted from the current bilinear term 
plays an essential role for the global supersymmetry. The pseudo invariance of the Wess- 
Zumino term ( |1.3| ) gives a surface term contribution to the supercharge. Under the global 
supersymmetry transformation with a parameter e, the variation of the Lagrangian ([2.1|) 
comes from only the subtracted total derivative term 

6 £ C = S^TdiUjOTity) 

= diUl . (3.1) 

There is no contribution from Cartan one forms L A , since they are invariant under the 
global supersymmetry up to the local Lorentz which is cancelled in the Lorentz invariant 
Lagrangian. The supersymmetry charge is written as 

e Q = J da[ P 6 £ x + (5 £ 9 - U° e ] , U Q £ = =F2T0ri&(5 e 0) (3.2) 

with p and ( being canonical conjugates of x and 9. The last term gives the topological 
string charge in the superalgebra. 

The symmetry transformation rules 5 £ x and 5 £ 9 are determined as follows. Under the 
supersymmetry transformation an element of a coset Q/7i is transformed as G — > gGh 
with g G Q and h e H respectively. For an infinitesimal global parameter e, variational 
one-form (|2.8|) is given as 

G^SeG = G- 1 (g - 1) G + (h - 1) = A £ L A T A (3.3) 
= 5 £ z M L M A T A . 



7 



Therefore once A e L's and L 1 are obtained, symmetry transformation rules are deter- 
mined as 



5 £ z M = A £ L A (L- 



(3.4) 



At first let us calculate L 1 in ( |3.4j ). Coefficients of Cartan one forms are given from 

as 



J M 



I T a _ p & _|_ C) 

x -'m in ' w m ""in 



T a 



L m a ^ — ui m ab + @ m ^L^ °* £ m a — Q^L,, a ^ 



with 



ab 



M 



T ab 

r a 



5 a ' + 



sm x 



. „ / smh x , \ „ „ . 
x a i 1 Y a e a 

I x / ' 

1 / sinh(|) \2 [ fe] a / 6 / 

2 V x/2 / TO 5 

{-§ e(e m a 7 a + ie^'ja'W + \^ m ab lab + cu m a ' b ' wW}' 



T a 



1 Y ° 



I ( sin (T) \ S [a'b') 



sm(f ) 



*/2 



a ab f sin (|-) 



m: 



T a 



T a'b' 



e~i a ' h 'e 



,9^ \ 2 

2 ' 



<5/2 



(3.5) 



(3.6) 



Its inverse is defined by L M A (L 



-1\ N 



5 M N and is given by 



{L~ l ) A N 



\\ n 

a 



with 



-IN n 



-1\ n 



s n n + 



( x 



' ab 



V sinh : 



1 Y„ 



(L 



-1\ n 
lab 



8 J + 



x 



sm x 



7 -l T a ," , (L~ l ) a ,y = 



^ l-2(siui>l'/2!..- ^ " 



(sin*)/* 



(3.7) 



{3A 



where this solution is well-defined in a flat limit although an ambiguity exists caused by 
the rectangular matirx ( |3.5|) and (|3.?1 ) which is removed by the local Lorentz degrees of 
freedom. 



8 



Next let us calculate A e L A for global supersymmetry in ( |3.4| ). From the relation of 
3]), i.e. G- l 5 e G = G^sQG + |h aS J aS , A £ L A, s are obtained as: 



A e L a 



A £ L ab 

A £ L a 



- sin * 



sm 



A e L a = 2# 7 



,/ sin * _ 



26 1 ab e^-^e + hf , A e L 



a'b' 



COS *£ 



(3.9) 



e = exp[|e(x a 7 a + ix a 7 a >)]e = e te ^' 2 e 



with 



. ab 



a'b' 



6 \ e 7 afc + i-i a x 



,(sinhf/f) 2 \ (sinf/f 



sinh x/x J sin * /* 



2 



Combining 



-i6j n 
* 

- — -£ 
sm * 



svux'/x' J sin*/* 
^if) , ( p.9|) and (|3.10|) gives supertransformation rules as 



8111 2/2 



(3.10) 



sin*/* 



(3.11) 



+ 



( sin f/f 
sin * /* 



with 



7" 



7 a (e 1 ) a m , for m = ~ 4 

ry a '(e 



1 ) , , for m = 5 ~ 9 



. ab 



2 sinh x/x 



to 



a'b' 



(e- 1 )™^' = -5 f x°^ 



a' b nl{ s[n Y/ 



'\2 



2 sinx'/x' 

Inserting ( |3.1ip into (3.2|), the supersymmetry charge is written as 

Qaa'I 



(3.12) 



da 



fsin - /- 



sin*/* 



+C <! i + - A (labOeie^ + ii c uf) - ia'b'ee(er b + 7 C ^ 



'sin | \ 2 
J/2 



±2TQT X d a J f 1 + \ ( lab 99(er b + ^7 C ^) - la'b'Od^' + 7^^)) 



sin*/* 



o ie0/2 



(3.13) 



sin*/* 



M/2 



9 



The momentum charge and the Lorentz charge are analogously obtained in the ap- 
pendix and given by 



da 



Pa + P' b XcU & b& + Clbc^a' 



be 



for a, b, c = ~ 4 or 5 ~ 9 



Jab = J d ° [P[aH] + \^ab d \ 



(3.14) 



These charges of the super-AdSs x S 5 space satisfy the following commutators 



-^i{rz)ij{CC'^ a ) aa 'i3i3iZ a 



aa'PP'T-'a + e/j(CC" 'j ab ) aa i pp: J7jg (3.15) 



[P a ,Vb] — Jab , [P a ',Vb>] — —Ja'V 

{Pa, Jh e ) = ndPt ~ VacV' b , \J- ah jy = rfcjtf + 3 terms 
[Qi,V a } = i -Qjj a e JI , [Q J ,V a ,] = ~Qry a ,e JI , [Qi,JJ 



(3.16) 



oQllab 



up to the local Lorentz generator. The topological term Z is obtained from the surface 
term as explained in the beginning of this section 



5 A- / da Ul 



0=0 



£ '(^)( ±r )(_ r3 )^( i ccv ^M) 



A//3J 



£ /(/3J £ dJ) i(r 3 ) /J (CC / 7 a ) a ^a 



where X = \Jx a x a + x a ' x a i and 



Z a = ±T J da d a I x a 



sinh X s 
X 



(3.17) 



(3.18) 



For a zero-mode of the string this string charge vanishes and 32 supersymmetries remain. 
For massive excited states this string charge breaks half supersymmetries as same as BPS 
states. After rescaling x — > x/R and taking the flat limit R — > oo this reduces into the 

flat string charge, T J da d a x a - 



Conclusions and discussions 



We have shown that the pseudo-superinvariant Wess-Zumino term written in the form 
of B in (|1.3|) satisfies the three conditions, (a) correct three form if[ 3 ], (b) K-invariance 
and (c) correct flat limit. We have constructed global charges of the super- AdS space 



10 



Q, V, J and a string charge Z in ( |3.18| ) appeared in the supercharge commutator. We 
have also mentioned that a generalization of the IW contraction is required to give a 
correct flat limit of the bilinear Wess-Zumino term, where the next leading term in the 
limiting procedure is preserved to make the fermionic part of the group metric to be 
nondegenerate, i.e. not only L\/ 2 but also L 3 / 2 should be preserved in fl2.18| ) as shown 



in ( p.28|) . In a flat space the bilinear Wess-Zumino term can not exist as shown in fl4 



but in AdS spaces the bilinear form Wess-Zumino terms exist. This fact is a reflection of 
the fact that the super- AdS algebra is nondegenerate. In order to have the bilinear Wess- 
Zumino term even in a flat space after some group contraction, we need a generalization 
of the IW-contraction where the scale parameter does not disappear completely and the 
resultant superalgebra is nondegenerate fl(| . 



Once AdS brane actions are obtained, pp brane actions can be easily obtained by 
an analogous limiting procedure to the section 2.3 corresponding to the contraction of 
super-AdS groups pO . 



Acknowledgments 

We are grateful to Kiyoshi Kamimura for pointing out the equation ( |3.4| ) and for 
fruitful discussions. We thank a referee for clarifying the point "Are B and B^} same or 
not?" to improve our previous paper [|10|] . 



A Appendix 

The momentum and Lorentz charges are also obtained analogously to the supersymmetry 
charges by taking infinitesimal parameters y a and \ ab = {X ab , X ab }. The momentum 
charge is given by 

y h V~ a = J da[ Pm 5 y x m + (,5 y e^} . (A.l) 
Translation variation leads to A y L A in fl3.4|) as 

A y L a = y a - z'0 7 a ^— Y0 , A y L a ' = y a ' + 9-f a '^^Y9 

A y L ab = ~y ab + ei ab e^Y0 + hf , A y L a ' b> = tf V - 6^ ' e^-YO + hf , (A.2) 
A y L« = b ^Y9 

with 

^ = y a + ( cosha; _ i) y *>T h a , y a ' = y a ' + (cos x' - 1)/T fc , a ' (A.3) 

~ ab \a b] sinhx ~ a ' b ' . \g' b'] sinx' 

y — x y r i y — x y T > 



11 



The subgroup parameter h's are determined by 



(A.4) 

where 5 y x m is determined independently on h's because of (L _1 ) a - m = 0. Using the above 
relations the transformation rules under the translation are obtained analogously to ( |3.4| ) 
by 



5yX m 



j y rn + (coshx — l)y n T n rra , for m, n = ~ 4 
1 y m + (cosx' — l)y m T n m , for m, ri = 5 ~ 9 



(A.5) 



The Lorentz charge is given by 



1 



^ b Jah= I da[p m 5 x x m + 



(A.6) 



The Lorentz variation leads to A £ L A in ( |3.4| ) obtained as ( |A.2[ ) where y a , y a , and the 

~ a _ _, 

subscript „ are replaced by A , A afe , A# and a subscript \ with 



A 



[-f e(A 7 a + iA TaO + |(^ 6 Ta6 + A^V&O^ 

6 sinhx ~ a ' , b ,sinx' 

A , A — A 



,r 



A afe = A ab + a>A fe ix c 



x' 

X 2 ~ x' 2 



• (A.7) 



The Lorentz variation rules are obtained as 



5xX m = yrn^n 

SX0» = Ula b \ ab + la> b >\ a ' b ')e 



(A.8) 



References 



[3] 



[1] R.R.Metsaev and A.A.Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 109, [hep-th/ 9805028 
[2] 



Phys. Lett. B443 (1998) 143, |hep-th/9808038 



For example, 

R.Kallosh and J.Rahmfeld, 
J.Rahmfeld and A.Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 64014, |hep-th/98091~64 
I.Pesando, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 002, |hep-th/9808020 
Phys. 02 (1999) 007, |iep-th/ 98091451 ; 



J. High Energy 



J.Park and S-J.Rey, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1999) 001, |hep-th/98l2UBl ; 
J-G. Zhou, Nucl. Phys. B559 (1999) 92, |hep-th/9906013] 

N. Berkovits, M. Bershadsky, T. Hauer, S. Zhukov and B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. 
B567 (2000) 61, |hep-th/9907200| . 



12 



[4] M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and M.Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 105024, |hep- 
th/0007009| . 



R.Roiban and W.Siegel, J. High Energy Phys. 0011 (2000) 024, |hep-th/0010T04 



L.Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, |hep-th/9711200| ; 
S.S.Gubser, I.R.Klebanov and A.M.Polyakov, Phys.Lett. B248 (1998) 105, |Kep= 



th/9802109| ; 



E.Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253, |hep-th/9802ToD| . 

M.B.Green and J.H.Schwarz, Phys. Lett. B136 (1984) 367; Nucl. Phys. B243 (1994) 
285. 

W.Siegel, Phys. Lett. 128B (1983) 397. 
K.Kamimura, private communication. 

M.Hatsuda and M.Sakaguchi, "Wess-Zumino term for the AdS superstring and gen- 
eralized Inonii-Wigner contraction" , |hep-th/0106114j . 

R.R.Metsaev, C.B.Thorn and A.A.Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B596 (2001) 151, |hep 



th/0009171 



R.R.Metsaev and A.A.Tseytlin, J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 2987, |hep-th/00lll9l 



M.Hatsuda and K.Kamimura, Nucl. Phys. B611 (2001) 77, |hep-th/0106202 . 

D. Olive and E.Witten, Nucl. Phys. B78 (1978) 97; 

E. Witten. Nucl. Phys. B443 (1995) 85, |hep-th/9503T24" . 



J.A.de Azcarraga and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2579. 

J.A.de Azcarraga, J.M.Izquierdo and P.K.Townsend, Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 366. 

B. Craps, J.Gomis, D.Mateos and A. Van Proeyen, J. High Energy Phys. 4 (1999) 
9904, |hep-th/990l060 . 



T.Sato, Phys. Lett B439 (1998) 12, |hep-th/9804202| ; Phys. Lett. B441 (1998) 105 
|hep-th/9805209| , |hep-th/98120ll . 

K.Furuuchi, N.Ohta and J-G. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 047901, |Eep^th/9902122 
K.Sfetsos, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2784, |hep-th/ 94020311 



M.Hatsuda, K.Kamimura and M.Sakaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B632 (2002) 114, |hep- 
th/0202190 ; "Super-PP-wave algebra from super-AdSxS algebras in eleven- 



dimensions", to appear in Nucl. Phys. B, |hep-th/0204002 



13