f Environmental
Ecological
■' Water
W Construction
Management
249 Vanderbilt Avenue
Norwood, MA 02062
781.278.3700
www.gza.com
(
August 18, 2015
GZA File No: 01.00171521.10
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Northeast Regional Office
205B Lowell Street
Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887
Re: Release Abatement Measure Plan
Pre-Construction Remediation Activities
(Former) Everett Staging Yard
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Release Tracking Number 3-13341
To Whom It May Concern:
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA), on behalf of Wynn MA, LLC (Wynn MA), has prepared this
Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Plan to describe those Response Actions pursuant to the
Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) that will be completed prior to the initiation of the
construction of the Wynn Resort in Everett on the land-side portion of the above-referenced
Disposal Site (the Site). Additional Response Actions will be the subject of future submittals under
the MCP.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
f(€F
3 33 .
3- W
Soil, groundwater, and sediment at the Disposal Site have been contaminated by historic
activities, including the former use of the Site as a chemical manufacturing facility. The activities
described in this RAM Plan will reduce the risks associated with soil and groundwater
contamination in three areas of the Site identified as the A-5 Area, the CES-2 Area, and the Low
pH Area. Soil containing elevated concentrations of arsenic and lead in the A-5 Area will be
excavated and disposed of off-Site. Elevated concentrations of arsenic in soil and groundwater in
the CES-2 Area will be addressed through a combination of the excavation and disposal of soil off-
Site. Soil and groundwater in the Low pH Area will be treated using in-situ
solidification/stabilization (ISS) to both reduce the ability of groundwater to flow through the
Area, and raise the pH to limit the further mobilization of metals from soil to groundwater. During
the RAM activities, real-time perimeter air monitoring will be conducted to assure the protection
of both on-Site workers and off-Site residents.
INTRODUCTION
A Site Locus Map is presented as Figure 1; an Exploration Location Plan is included as Figure 2;
and the areas that will be subject to the provisions of this RAM Plan are delineated on Figure 3.
This RAM Plan has been prepared in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0444 of the MCP, and with the
Limitations in Appendix A. This RAM Plan will be submitted electronically through MassDEP's
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 2
eDEP online filing system. A copy of the RAM transmittal form (BWSC-106) is included in
Appendix B.
The Disposal Site has been designated as a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) Site in accordance with
Section 40.1404 of the MCP. A draft version of this RAM Plan was presented at a public meeting
on June 2, 2015, at 7:00 PM in the third-floor City Council Chamber at Everett City Hall, at
484 Broadway. The original comment period for the RAM Plan ended on June 22, 2015; however,
at the request of the PIP petitioners, the comment period was extended to July 22, 2015. A list of
comments received, and responses to those comments, is included as Appendix C.
This RAM Plan relies on information presented in prior reports submitted for the Disposal Site,
including:
• Phase I Initial Site Investigation Report, Alford Street, Everett, Massachusetts, prepared by
Consulting Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (CES) and dated January 15,1997;
• Phase II - Comprehensive Site Assessment, Everett Staging Yard, Chemical Lane, Everett
Massachusetts, DEP RTN 3-13341, prepared by Tetra Tech Rizzo (TTR) and dated December
26, 2007;
• Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment, Everett Staging Yard, 1 Horizon Way, Everett,
Massachusetts, MassDEP RTN 3-13341, prepared by GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) and dated
February 10, 2012; and
• Phase III Remediation Action Plan, Everett Staging Yard, 1 Horizon Way, Everett,
Massachusetts, MassDEP RTN 3-13341, prepared by GEI and dated August 27, 2013.
The following sections of this submittal are intended to address the specific requirements for a
RAM Plan under 310 CMR 40.0444.
PERSON ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITY FOR RAM
The entity assuming responsibility for this RAM is Wynn MA, LLC. Information for Wynn MA's
contact person is provided below:
Mr. Robert DeSalvio
President
Wynn MA, LLC
3131 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
Tel: 702-770-7000
DESCRIPTION OF RELEASE, SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING RECEPTORS
The following sections provide a description of the Site and surrounding area conditions, the Site
and regulatory history (including a description of the release being addressed by the RAM), and
the results of recent subsurface assessment activities.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 3
SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA CONDITIONS
This RAM Plan addresses certain conditions on the land-side portion of the Site, which includes
approximately 25 acres of land within the City of Everett (Figure 1). The latitude and longitude
for the Site are 42.395 degrees north and 71.069 degrees west, respectively. The Universal
Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates are 4,695,683 meters north and 329,684 meters east.
Access to the land-side portion of the Site is limited by the presence of a chain-link fence with two
gates: one gate is in the eastern portion of the Site, along Horizon Way, and the second gate is
located on the northern portion of the Site across an extension of Horizon Way. The ground
surface at the Site is generally bituminous pavement (center), unpaved, or compacted coarse
gravel. The ground surface at the land-side portion of the Site is generally flat with a gentle slope
toward the southwest. Based on an April 2013 survey prepared by Harry R. Feldman, Inc.
(Professional Land Surveyors), ground surface elevations on the land-side portion of the Site range
from approximately 8 to 13 feet NAVD88.
The Site is adjoined to the northeast by a vehicle maintenance and repair facility operated by the
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA); to the southeast by properties along Alford
Street, including a vacant commercial building and facilities operated by the Boston Water and
Sewer Commission (BWSC) and the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA); to the
southwest by the Mystic River; and to the northwest by railroad tracks for the MBTA Commuter
Rail, beyond which are several large commercial/retail buildings associated with the Gateway
Center.
The Site is located within the Boston Basin, a regional depression of bedrock consisting primarily
of Cambridge Argillite, a partially metamorphosed siltstone. Site conditions generally consist of
fill over a variable sequence of naturally deposited organics, sand and gravel, and silty clay over
weathered rock and bedrock. Filling over naturally deposited materials occurred in the area of
the Site from the late 1800s through the early 1960s. More recent naturally deposited sediments
along the shoreline include sand, silt, and organics.
Depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 4 to 10 feet. Groundwater at the Site flows
generally toward the east on the southern portion of the Site and generally toward the south on
the northern portion of the Site.
According to a Massachusetts Geographic Information System (MassGIS) map, a copy of which is
included in Appendix D, the Site is not located in or within 500 feet of a Zone II public water supply,
potentially productive aquifer, a Zone A surface water body, an Interim Wellhead Protection Area,
a protected wetlands habitat, or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern. Protected open space
associated with Gateway Park is located approximately 400 feet to the northwest of the Site.
SITE AND REGULATORY HISTORY
Investigations conducted between 1995 and the present have identified several contaminants in
soil, groundwater, and sediments at the Disposal Site, including metals, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) fractions and target analytes, semi¬
volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (EPH) fractions and
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 4
target analytes, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The sources of contamination at the
Disposal Site include past industrial operations, leakage from a former aboveground storage tank
(AST), and the placement of contaminated fill. According to historic reports, the Site was occupied
by the Cochran Chemical Company, the Merrimac Chemical Company and the Monsanto Chemical
Company from the late 1800s until the late 1960s. The buildings on the land-side portion of the
Site were razed in the 1970s. The land-side portion of the Site has been used primarily as a
material storage and staging yard since the mid-1990s when rock and fine-grained sediment
("tunnel muck") from the construction of the Deer Island Outfall was stockpiled on it in a 1- to 7-
foot thick layer. There are currently no buildings at the Site.
In 1995, Consulting Engineers and Scientists, Inc. (CES) of Lakeville, Massachusetts, performed a
limited subsurface investigation at the Site prior to it being used as the tunnel muck stockpile
area. Arsenic and lead concentrations in soil samples collected during the investigation exceeded
the applicable MCP Reportable Concentrations (RCS-2). On January 18,1996, O'Donnell Sand and
Gravel ("O'Donnell"), the property owner at the time, submitted a Release Notification Form
(RNF) to MassDEP, and MassDEP assigned RTN 3-13341 to the release. Later in 1996, the
excavated tunnel muck and rock were stockpiled and/or spread across the upland portion of the
Site. In mid-1999, tunnel muck from the Site was used to cap a separate portion of the former
Monsanto property, located across the railroad tracks and west of the Site, as part of the
construction of the Gateway Center Mall, but a 1- to 7-foot thick layer of the tunnel muck remains
at the Site.
In December 1996, CES conducted a Phase I Initial Site Investigation (ISI). Arsenic and lead
concentrations in the soil exceeded the applicable RCS-2 standards, and dissolved arsenic and
lead in groundwater exceeded the RCGW-2 standard. In January 1997, on behalf of O'Donnell,
CES submitted a Phase I ISI and Tier Classification (Phase I report) to MassDEP. The Disposal Site
was classified as a Tier II Disposal Site. The Phase I report identified arsenic, lead, and low pH as
contaminants of concern (COCs). O'Donnell submitted a Phase II Extension Request to MassDEP
in February 1999 and sold the property to Mystic Landing, LLC ("Mystic Landing") in 2001.
In 2001, on behalf of Mystic Landing, Rizzo Associates (a predecessor to Tetra Tech Rizzo, Inc. of
Framingham, Massachusetts ("Tetra Tech Rizzo")) performed a limited subsurface investigation
at the Site, including the collection of soil and groundwater samples. The findings of the
subsurface investigation were similar to CES's findings. Between 2005 and 2007, Tetra Tech Rizzo
conducted additional subsurface investigations, including the collection of additional soil,
groundwater and sediment samples. The results of these investigations were also generally
consistent with those from previous sampling rounds.
In June and July 2007, Williams Environmental, Inc. (Williams) conducted a supplemental
subsurface investigation at the Site, including the excavation of 40 test pits and the collection of
soil, groundwater and sediment samples. As with previous analyses of environmental media
conducted at the Site, lead and arsenic were the contaminants detected at the highest
concentrations and with the greatest frequency.
In December 2007, on behalf of Mystic Landing, Tetra Tech Rizzo submitted a Phase II
Comprehensive Site Assessment (Phase II CSA) and Tier II Extension Request to MassDEP. The
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 5
Human Health Risk Assessment included in Tetra Tech Rizzo's CSA concluded that there was No
Significant Risk (NSR) and No Substantial Hazard associated with the current use of the Site as a
construction material storage yard or for similar uses that did not disturb the surficial layer of
tunnel muck.
FBT Everett Realty, LLC (FBT) purchased the Site from Mystic Landing in October 2009. On
February 11, 2010, GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) submitted an Eligible Person Certification and
Revised Tier Classification Submittal to MassDEP on behalf of FBT. The Disposal Site remained a
Tier II Disposal Site based on the Revised Tier Classification Submittal and, pursuant to 310 CMR
40.0570, the deadlines for conducting response actions at the Disposal Site were re-established.
Wynn MA is also an Eligible Person as discussed on page 10 of this RAM Plan.
In February 2012, GEI submitted a Phase II CSA based only on data previously developed by others
because GEI's access to the Site was reportedly denied by the Site occupant. As part of the Phase
II CSA, GEI conducted a Method 3 Risk Characterization which concluded that a Condition of NSR
to human health existed at the Site for most of the then current uses of the Site, but that NSR
could not be demonstrated for foreseeable future Site uses. NSR could not be demonstrated for
future commercial workers or future visitors exposed to site-wide soils, for future construction
workers exposed to site-wide soils or shallow groundwater, or for utility workers exposed to soil,
shallow groundwater, or ambient air within a potential utility trench in a specific area near the
northern corner of the Site.
Because of the delay in obtaining access to the Site, FBT filed a Notification of Delay with MassDEP,
requesting that the deadline for the Phase III - Remedial Action Plan (RAP) be extended from
February 2013 to June 2013, and that the deadline for the Phase IV - Remedy Implementation
Plan (RIP) be extended from February 2014 to June 2014. FBT subsequently filed a second
Notification of Delay requesting that the Phase III RAP deadline be extended to September 2013,
and the Phase IV deadline be extended to June 11, 2015.
GEI conducted additional soil and groundwater investigations in December 2012 and March 2013.
These investigations included the installation of a series of soil borings and monitoring wells on
the land-side portion of the Site, and the collection and analysis of soil and groundwater samples.
The results of the additional investigations were generally consistent with those previously
documented. GEI also conducted a bench scale evaluation of in-situ solidification/stabilization
(ISS) of soils as a remedial alternative for certain areas of the Site. On August 30, 2013, FBT filed
a Phase III RAP for the Site outlining the selected Remedial Action Alternatives (RAA). The Phase
III RAP identified three areas of concern to be addressed to reach a Permanent Solution under the
MCP on the land-side portion of the Site. These areas are depicted on Figure 3, and are described
below. For the water-side portion of the Disposal Site, GEI selected "Further Assessment and
Monitoring" as the recommended RAA, indicating that this approach would initially result in a
Temporary Solution, but that the "remediation planned on the land-side portion of the Site is
likely to change conditions on the water-side portion of the Site and this RAA will allow the impact
of those changes to be evaluated."
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 6
The three land-side areas identified in the Phase III RAP are as follows:
A-5 Area: The A-5 area is situated in the northern portion of the Site in the vicinity of previous
exploration location A-5, where lead and arsenic concentrations (216,000 and 153,000 mg/kg,
respectively) were detected in a soil sample obtained by Williams in 2007 from approximately
8 feet below ground surface (bgs). GEI conducted several rounds of soil sampling in the A-5 area
in an attempt to duplicate the original sample and to delineate the impacts in this area. However,
GEI was unable to duplicate the elevated A-5 results. Arsenic concentrations in the samples
collected by GEI were lower than the initial A-5 analytical results by two orders of magnitude or
more, but many were above the Upper Concentration Limit (UCL) of 500 mg/kg. Similarly, lead
concentrations in the samples collected by GEI were lower than the initial A-5 analytical results
but many exceeded the UCL of 6,000 mg/kg. No specific source for the elevated arsenic and lead
levels has been identified, and the impacts appear to be random and related to fill material.
Groundwater samples collected from this area have not indicated concentrations of metals above
the applicable Method 1 GW-3 Standards. GZA has conducted additional soil sampling (discussed
below) in the A-5 Area to further delineate the extent of releases in the area.
CES-2 Area: The CES 2 area is situated in the northern portion of the peninsula, in the vicinity of
previous exploration CES-2. Arsenic has been detected in both soil and groundwater in this area.
The highest concentration of arsenic in soil (9,470 mg/kg) was observed in CES-2-3, while the
maximum dissolved concentration of arsenic (114,000 ug/L) was detected in a groundwater
sample from CES-2-2. Unlike the Low pH area (see below), soil and groundwater pH levels in the
CES-2 area are relatively neutral, ranging from 4.74 to 6.82. GZA has conducted additional
assessments of the CES-2 Area to determine the extent of this area that are discussed below.
Low pH Area: The Low pH Area includes the southern corner of the peninsula where the pH has
been measured to be at or below 4, with the lowest levels detected at the southern end in
SHORE-9. Overall, the pH of groundwater in the land-side portion of the Site ranges from 1.63 to
7.93. Dissolved arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel and zinc, along with total cyanide, have
been detected above the applicable Method 1 GW-3 Standards, with the concentrations of
arsenic, cadmium and lead in groundwater samples from certain wells above their respective
UCLs. As indicated in the Phase III RAP, a plot of dissolved lead concentrations against pH indicates
a strong correlation between pH below 4 and dissolved lead concentrations above the UCL. GZA
has conducted additional assessment in this area to further delineate the extent of groundwater
with a pH below 4.
Based on the results of the Method 3 Risk Characterization Update in the Phase III RAP, the
following Remedial Objectives were identified:
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 7
Location
Remedial Objective Description
Media
Primary
Constituents
of Concern
A-5 Area
• Reduce soil concentrations to below
UCLs
• Remove soil with arsenic and lead
concentrations similar to sample A-5
• Reduce risk for future construction
workers
Soil
Arsenic
Lead
CES-2 Area
• Remove potential source material
• Reduce groundwater concentrations
to below UCLs
• Reduce risk for future construction
workers
Soil
Groundwate
r
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH
Area
• Treat potential source material
• Reduce groundwater concentrations
to below UCLs
• Adjust pH to greater than
approximately 4
Soil
Groundwate
r
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH
The remedial alternative selected by GEI for the land-side portion of the Site included the in-situ
solidification/stabilization (ISS) of contaminated soil in the Low pH Area and CES-2 Area, and the
excavation and off-site disposal of contaminated soil from the A-5 Area. However, as discussed
below, GZA proposes to excavate and dispose of soil from the CES-2 Area; because of the more
complicated geochemistry of arsenic, excavation and removal is a more appropriate option for
achieving the remedial objectives described above.
RECENT SUBSURFACE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
The following sections summarize recent subsurface assessment activities.
A-5 Area
On October 31 and November 3, 2014, GZA engaged New England Boring Contractors
(NEB) of Brockton, Massachusetts to install 12 soil borings, GZ101 through GZ112, at the Site to
further assess the areal extent of lead and arsenic impacts in soil in the A-5 Area. The soil borings
were installed using a GeoProbe* direct-push rig; soils were sampled continuously throughout the
borings and logged by a GZA representative. Soil borings were advanced to approximately 12
feet bgs. Boring locations are shown on Figure 2 and boring logs are included in Appendix E.
Subsurface conditions observed during drilling included varying thicknesses of tunnel muck, fill,
organics, clayey silt and silty clay, with a fine to medium sand layer observed in several of the
borings. The fill ranged in thickness from approximately 4 to 8 feet, and was underlain by a layer
of peat.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 8
Selected soil samples were field-screened for total VOC vapors using a PID. Field screening
results were below the detection limits (BDL) of the PID unit for samples from soil borings GZ101
to GZ105, GZ107, and GZ109 to GZ111; readings ranged from BDL to 20.2 ppm in boring GZ106,
from BDL to 11.1 ppm in boring GZ108, and from BDL to 0.9 ppm in boring GZ112. Soil samples
were collected at approximate 2-foot intervals from each of the borings and submitted to ESS
Laboratory (ESS) of Cranston, Rhode Island for analysis of total arsenic and total lead. Analytical
data are summarized on Table 1, and analytical laboratory reports are included in Appendix F.
The laboratory analytical results indicated that concentrations of both arsenic and lead
were present above laboratory detection limits in all soil samples analyzed. Soil samples exceeded
the MCP S-2/GW-3 Standards for arsenic (20 mg/kg) in at least three samples from each of the
12 borings, and exceeded the UCL for arsenic (500 mg/kg) in borings GZ101 to GZ106, GZ109,
GZ111 and GZ112. The highest concentrations of arsenic were detected in samples collected from
boring GZ102, with a maximum detection of 13,500 mg/kg reported for the 2- to 4-foot bgs
interval. Arsenic concentrations dropped significantly within the underlying natural materials; the
highest arsenic concentration in samples obtained at or below 10 feet bgs was 17 mg/kg.
Laboratory analytical results indicated that concentrations of lead exceeded MCP
S-2/GW-3 Standards (500 mg/kg) in at least two samples from each of the 12 borings performed,
and exceeded the applicable UCL (9,000 mg/kg) in borings GZ102 and GZ111. The highest
concentrations of lead were detected in boring GZ102, with a maximum detection of
21,900 mg/kg in the 2- to 4-foot bgs interval. As with arsenic, lead concentrations dropped
significantly within the natural materials. The highest lead concentration in samples obtained at
or below 10 feet bgs was 48.4 mg/kg.
Based on the analytical data developed as part of recent assessment activities, the A-5
Area has been expanded southerly to include exploration locations GZ101, GZ102 and GZ103, and
is bounded by explorations A-5-2, A-5-3, A-5-4, A-5-5, A-5-6, GZ104, GZ106, GZ107, GZ108, and
GZ109. The average arsenic and lead concentrations in soil samples obtained from the top 10
feet in this latter set of explorations were 157 mg/kg and 1,015 mg/kg, respectively.
CES-2 Area
On January 23, 2015, constant head hydraulic conductivity (K) testing was performed in
two existing monitoring wells (CES-2-1 and CES-2-2) within the CES-2 Area, and in one well
immediately outside of the CES-2 Area (BOR-109-3), to characterize the hydrogeologic properties
of the shallow soils and to support groundwater flow calculations in preparation for dewatering
of the area during remediation. At each monitoring well location, the initial depth-to-water level
and total well depth were measured. A pressure transducer was then installed within the
monitoring well approximately 1 to 5 feet from the bottom of the well. A submersible pump was
installed in the well and set up to discharge water into a 5-gallon bucket. Once the water level in
the monitoring well stabilized to the measured pre-test level, the pump was turned on to begin
extracting water. The flow rate of the pump, as well as the groundwater level, were monitored to
establish a groundwater level equal to approximately 2/3 of the length of the saturated portion
of the well screen, when possible. The flow rate and hydraulic head were regularly recorded and
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 9
monitored for approximately 15 to 30 minutes to confirm a stabilized flow rate and hydraulic
head. The procedure was reported three times at each well. Results of the sampling were used
to calculate hydraulic conductivities using the Hvorslev constant head equation for a well point-
filter in uniform soil. Average hydraulic conductivity estimates calculated from the test results for
CES-2-1 and CES-2-2 were 0.06 and 0.43 feet/day, respectively. The average hydraulic
conductivity calculated for BOR-109-3 was 17.77 feet/day; however, BOR-109-3 penetrated the
fill layer and was screened in a sand layer beneath the fill. Information concerning the hydraulic
conductivity calculations is included as Appendix G.
Dewatering of the CES-2 excavation will be necessary to facilitate the excavation of the
impacted soils. GZA prepared a numerical groundwater flow model for the Site using Modflow
and GMS software. The model was developed using available geologic and hydrogeologic
information from the Site (e.g., soil boring and monitoring well logs, groundwater flow, hydraulic
conductivity, and tidal information). The steady-state flow model included an evaluation of
groundwater extraction rates needed to dewater the CES-2 remedial area to an elevation
of -6 feet (NAVD88), assuming cutoff walls would be footed in the underlying organic silt layer on
the southwestern, southeastern, and northeastern sides of the excavation. Results of the model
indicated that a groundwater extraction rate between 0.3 and 2 gallons per minute will be
required.
Low pH Area
On November 5, 6, 7 and 10, 2014, GZA engaged NEB to install 14 soil borings (GZ201 to
GZ214). These borings were performed to further assess the extent of the Low pH Area in the
southern peninsula. Boring locations were selected outside of the proposed GEI treatment area
to assess the extent of groundwater with a pH of 4 or less. The soil borings were executed using
a drill rig equipped with hollow-stem augers. Soils were characterized by a GZA representative by
a combination of split spoon sampling and drill cutting observations. Soil borings extended to
depths of 14 to 17 feet below bgs. Selected soil samples were field-screened for total VOC vapors
using a PID; all results were below the PID unit detection limit of 0.1 parts per million (ppm). No
laboratory analysis of soil samples was performed. Boring logs are included in Appendix E.
Prior to work commencing on borings within the 100-foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank
(Buffer Zone), and in accordance with Special Conditions amended to the Negative Determination
of Applicability of the Wetlands Protection Act by the Everett Conservation Commission on
October 23, 2014, Filtrexx erosion control socks were placed around the rig for those borings.
Monitoring wells were installed in all 14 soil borings and were constructed using 2-inch
diameter PVC wellscreen and riser. The annular space around each well casing was filled with
clean silica sand, and a layer of bentonite was place above the sand. The well was backfilled to
ground surface with excess drill cuttings, and was completed with a steel standpipe equipped with
a locking cap. Well installations extended to the top of the naturally occurring material, and wells
were screened across the water table. Screen depths extended to 15 feet bgs for all wells except
GZ201, which was screened to 14 feet bgs where refusal was encountered.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 10
The newly-installed monitoring wells were allowed to equilibrate for at least 60 hours
prior to the collection of groundwater samples. On November 13, 2014, GZA collected
groundwater samples from each of the newly installed wells using EPA Low Stress (low flow)
sampling techniques. Field screening for pH during well purging indicated the range of pH at
sampling was from 3.24 to 7.76, with only one well (GZ210) exhibiting a pH below 4. The samples
were submitted to ESS for analysis of dissolved RCRA 8 metals and pH. Analytical data are
summarized on Table 2, and analytical laboratory reports are included in Appendix F.
Laboratory analytical results for pH ranged from 3.19 to 7.03, with only one well (GZ210)
exhibiting a pH below 4. Laboratory analytical results indicated that all analytes were below
applicable MCP Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for RCRA 8 Metals, but that Method 1 GW-3
standards were exceeded for cadmium (maximum detection was 45.10 pg/L), lead (maximum
detection was 49.2 pg/L), and arsenic (maximum detection was 4,370 pg/L). Exceedances of GW-3
standards were observed in groundwater analytical results from monitoring wells GZ202, GZ206,
GZ208, GZ209, GZ210, GZ211, GZ212 and GZ213, generally located in the southern and eastern
areas of the peninsula. Based on these results, the ISS area has been extended to include GZ210.
ELIGIBLE PERSON SUBMITTAL
On January 2, 2015, Wynn MA acquired the portion of the Site in Everett, Massachusetts. On
February 5, 2015, Wynn MA filed an Eligible Person Submittal and a Revised Tier II Classification
with MassDEP for RTN 3-13341.
OBJECTIVES, PLANS AND SCHEDULE
The objective of this RAM Plan is the removal or encapsulation of contaminants in the areas
identified in Figure 3 to achieve the remedial objectives identified on page 7. Specifically, the
following scope of work for the RAM is proposed:
• Excavation and off-Site disposal of soils from within the A-5 Area;
• Excavation and off-Site disposal of soils from within the CES-2 Area; and
• ISS of soils within the Low pH Area.
The RAM is anticipated to begin in September 2015, with work in all three areas occurring
concurrently. The anticipated duration of the RAM is approximately three to four months.
Procedures to be employed for the completion of these tasks are outlined below.
SITE PREPARATION
Prior to the initiation of the RAM, erosion controls will be placed along the Mystic River as
required under the Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) Order of Conditions issued authorizing these
RAM activities (MassDEP File # 022-0095). Erosion controls for the excavation will consist of
staked hay bales and silt fence placed immediately inward of the top of Coastal Bank along the
Low pH Area and CES-2 Area. The Low pH, CES-2 Area and A-5 Area materials management areas
(MMAs) will also be established at this time. The MMAs for the CES-2 Area and A-5 Area will be
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
f
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 11
lined with two layers of polyethylene sheeting (minimum 6-mil thickness). The Low pH area MMA
will be used for the temporary storage of shallow soils (mainly tunnel muck) from above the
treatment area and will not be lined.
HEALTH AND SAFETY PROTOCOLS
Excavation work in the RAM areas will be conducted by personnel trained to handle contaminated
materials per Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Regulation 29 CFR 1910.120.
Procedures will be followed to protect the health and safety of all on-site workers and the
community. A Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) specifying these procedures is attached as
Appendix H. All personnel involved in the implementation of the RAM will be required to address
the risks covered by the attached HASP. Procedures for the monitoring and control of fugitive dusts
are outlined below.
A-5 AREA EXCAVATION
The RAM in the A-5 Area will consist of the excavation and off-Site disposal of soils. The duration
of this element of the RAM is anticipated to be approximately 1 month.
Soil in the A-5 Area will be excavated to an average depth of approximately 8 feet bgs
(approximately 1 foot into the underlying peat layer). GZA anticipates that this excavation can be
performed without dewatering because the depth to groundwater is 4 to 10 feet bgs. If
dewatering is required, the dewatering water will be recharged immediately upgradient of the
excavation in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0045. As discussed above, groundwater samples
obtained from this area have not indicated concentrations of dissolved metals above Method 1
GW-3 Standards. The excavated soil will be transported to the A-5 Area MMA identified on
Figure 3 for characterization and subsequently transported off-Site for disposal as described
below. The anticipated volume of soil to be disposed off-Site from this area is approximately
1,800 cubic yards.
The excavation will either be backfilled with existing on-Site material, or secured and incorporated
into the planned excavation for a future subsurface parking garage. The method of excavation
will be selected by the remediation contractor subject to the approval of the LSP and Wynn MA,
and in compliance with the HASP.
CES-2 AREA
The RAM in the CES-2 Area will consist of the excavation and off-Site disposal of soils. The
duration of this element of the RAM is expected to be from 1 to 2 months.
Soil in the planned excavation area will be excavated to a depth of approximately 15 feet bgs.
Because the depth of excavation will extend to, and below, the groundwater table and the
excavation is proximate to the Mystic River, excavation shoring and dewatering will be required.
Shoring is anticipated to consist of hot-rolled steel sheet piling with sealed interlocks to minimize
groundwater infiltration. The sheeting will be installed along the waterside limit of the area to a
depth of approximately 45 feet bgs; the actual depth of sheeting will depend on field conditions
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 12
and the size of sheet-piling used. Additional sheeting will be installed approximately
perpendicular to the shoreline, along the northern and southern extents of the planned
excavation. The extent of proposed sheeting within the CES-2 area is depicted on Figure 3.
Procedures for groundwater treatment and discharge are discussed below.
After sheeting has been installed, overburden material from the top 6 feet will be excavated and
stockpiled separately within the CES-2 MMA identified on Figure 3. This excavation work will
include grading the slope in the western portion of the excavation area to allow equipment access.
Excavation of impacted soils is expected to be conducted in narrow cells perpendicular (east-west
direction) to the shore; each cell will be backfilled to pre-existing grades prior to the excavation
of an adjacent cell. To the extent possible, on-Site materials will be used for backfill. This
approach will minimize the need for bracing spans and increase excavation productivity; however,
final excavation design will be developed by the remediation contractor subject to the approval
of the LSP and Wynn MA, and in compliance with the HASP.
Impacted soils will either be live loaded, or transported to the CES-2 MMA for temporary
stockpiling before off-Site disposal. The anticipated volume of soil to be disposed off-Site from
the CES-2 Area is approximately 4,500 cubic yards.
Confirmatory soil samples will be obtained from the bottom of the excavation in the CES-2 Area.
The specific number of samples collected will be dependent on the final size of the excavation.
The soil samples will be analyzed for RCRA 8 metals to confirm that the remedial objectives have
been met.
Subsequent to the completion of the RAM activities outlined above, up to four monitoring wells
will be installed in the CES-2 Area to assess groundwater conditions. Well locations will be
dependent on field conditions, with consideration given to future redevelopment activities (for
example, to facilitate future sampling, monitoring wells will not be installed in areas where
significant vehicle access or materials storage is expected as part of construction). Existing wells
remaining in place immediately outside of the CES-2 excavation area after remediation will be
used to assess groundwater conditions outside of, but in proximity to the remediation area.
Groundwater samples will be collected for analysis for dissolved RCRA-8 metals and pH to confirm
the continued achievement of the remedial objectives.
LOW PH AREA
The RAM in the Low pH Area (groundwater with a pH of 4 or less) will consist of ISS. The duration
of this element of the RAM is expected to be from 2 to 3 months.
As detailed in the ISS bench scale testing report prepared by KEMRON in support of the GEI Phase
III RAP, an ISS mixture consisting of 6% Type I Portland cement resulted in a treated material with
an unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 151.9 psi and a permeability of 3.4xl0' 7 centimeters
per second (cm/sec). Testing performed on the leachates using the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Method 1315 leaching procedure showed that for the 6 % Type I Portland cement
ISS mixture, lead was detected at only two intervals with a maximum concentration of
0.005 milligrams per liter (mg/L), arsenic was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.012 to
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 13
0.084 mg/L, and cadmium was not reported above the detection limit of 0.0038 mg/L. These
concentrations were significantly less than the lead, arsenic and cadmium UCLs of 0.15 mg/L,
9.0 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. These concentrations were also below the Method 1GW-3
Standards for lead, arsenic, and cadmium of 0.01 mg/L, 0.09 mg/L and 0.004 mg/L, respectively.
Additionally, the lead and arsenic concentrations in the leachate from the treated sample were a
factor of 480 lower and a factor of 4 lower than the respective lead and arsenic concentrations in
the leachate from the untreated sample. Finally, the pH of the leachate from the 6% Type I
Portland cement ISS mixture ranged between 9.5 and 9.9. Taken collectively, these data indicate
that ISS will achieve the remedial objectives.
A sheet pile wall will be installed along the waterside limit of the ISS area to provide bank stability,
minimize groundwater infiltration, and prevent or minimize the potential migration of
stabilization chemicals introduced into the subsurface during the ISS process. The extent of
proposed sheet pile wall within the Low pH Area is depicted on Figure 3. The sheeting will be
installed along the waterside limit of the Low pH Area to a depth of approximately 20 feet bgs.
After sheeting has been installed, the top 4 feet of soil will be excavated from within the planned
treatment area and transported to the Low pH Area MMA identified on Figure 3 for temporary
storage. Removing the top 4 feet of material will create a below-grade mixing platform to keep
the ISS mixing process contained and to allow room for expansion of the solidified material. The
ISS treatment zone will extend from the bottom of the excavation (i.e., 4 feet bgs) to
approximately 1 foot into the silty sand unit underlying the fill material resulting in a treatment
zone that extends from approximately 4 feet to 15 feet bgs. The ISS treated material will expand
as part of the treatment and partially fill the space previously occupied by the excavated soil. At
the completion of ISS, the sheeting will be removed and the surface of the ISS treated area will be
re-graded to existing grades using the previously stockpiled overburden material. The anticipated
volume of soil to be treated using ISS is approximately 19,000 cubic yards.
Composite samples of treated soil will be collected during the implementation of ISS for quality
assurance purposes. Field testing will include visual inspection for homogeneity and
measurement of pH and will be performed as frequently as practicable, but not less than daily.
Color will also be monitored but will not be used as a criterion for adequate ISS mixing due to the
significant color contrast observed in soils on Site. The procedures for evaluating these criteria
are:
• Homogeneity : The treated material will first be visually inspected for overall mixing. The
material should be thoroughly mixed into a homogeneous mass and be free from large lumps
(greater than 3 inches) or pockets of fines, sand or gravel. Occasional lumps of up to 3 inches
in their largest dimension will be permitted. Insufficiently homogeneous mixtures will be
rejected, and the cell will be remixed and re-sampled.
• jdIH: The pH of the treated material will be measured using short (6 to 9 and 9 to 12) range pH
strips. Samples with a pH less than 10.5 standard units (S.U.) will be considered not
adequately mixed. If the pH is below 10.5 S.U., then the grout quantity will be checked, the
cell remixed (with added grout, if needed), and additional samples collected.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 14
If the field evaluation indicates that the treated materials fail one or more of these criteria, the
ISS cell will be considered not adequately mixed, and the contractor will be instructed to reprocess
it. Following re-mixing of the cell, another set of representative samples will be collected from
the remixed cell and subjected to the inspection described above.
To evaluate the effectiveness of ISS, the area will be divided into approximately 50 foot by 50 foot
grids, and one sample of treated material will be collected from each grid. We will submit these
samples to a laboratory to be evaluated for UCS and pH. The ISS performance standards will be
considered met if he average UCS is greater than 50 psi after either 14 or 28 days.
Subsequent to completion of the RAM activities outlined above, a network of monitoring wells
will be installed along the perimeter of the treated area to assess groundwater conditions. Well
locations will be dependent on field conditions, with consideration given to future redevelopment
activities (for example, to facilitate future sampling, monitoring wells will not be installed in areas
where significant vehicle access or materials storage is expected as part of construction). Existing
wells remaining in place immediately outside of the ISS area after remediation will be used to
assess groundwater conditions outside of, but in proximity to the remediation area. Groundwater
samples will be collected on a quarterly basis for at least one year for analysis for dissolved RCRA 8
metals and pH to confirm the achievement of the remedial objectives.
REMEDIATION WASTE MANAGEMENT
The following sections outline proposed procedures for the management of remediation waste
during implementation of the RAM.
SOIL MANAGEMENT
An excavated materials management plan (MMP) is included as Appendix I. Excavated soil from
each remediation area will be transported to the designated MMA and stockpiled for
characterization (for soils within the impacted zones) or potential future reuse (for overburden
material). Based on visual assessment, tunnel muck material will be stockpiled separately from
other excavated materials.
Representative samples from the stockpiled materials to be disposed of off-Site will be collected
and analyzed for disposal-related parameters to identify appropriate licensed disposal facilities to
receive the stockpiled material.
Based on the data from the initial investigations at the Site, the A-5 and CES-2 soil may contain
lead levels exceeding the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) criterion. If this is the
case, we will evaluate possible on-Site treatment options (e.g., stabilization) prior to transport
and disposal off-Site. The treatment of excavated soil will employ an in-situ chemical treatment
process (known as the MAECTITE® process) that converts lead to an insoluble form. Treatment
chemicals are applied directly to the stockpiled soils in liquid form and then mechanically mixed
with the soil. The treated material is then analyzed for TCLP lead to verify the effectiveness of the
process. This is a commonly used technique for addressing leachable metals that GZA has used
successfully at several sites in Massachusetts.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 15
The appropriate licensed disposal facilities, and the need for any on-Site treatment prior to
transport, will be identified based on the analyses of representative samples of the stockpiled
material.
Soil transported off-Site will be handled in accordance with the Bill of Lading (BOL) procedures
specified in the MCP at 310 CMR 40.0030. Each load of soil transported for disposal will be
accompanied by the appropriate BOL form. The form will be prepared and stamped by GZA's
Licensed Site Professional, and Wynn MA will be designated as the soil generator. The endorsed
tracking/receipt forms issued by the licensed disposal facility will be included in the RAM
Completion Report.
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
Dewatering effluent will be managed by on-site treatment and up-gradient discharge to an on¬
site recharge area or by off-site transport and disposal. Dewatering is anticipated for the CES-2
Area, and may also be required, but is not expected, for the A-5 Area. No dewatering is
anticipated for the Low pH Area.
Dewatering effluent from the CES-2 area recharged on-site will be required to meet MCP GW-3
standards. The effluent discharged to the on-site recharge area will be sampled and tested for
dissolved lead, dissolved arsenic, and pH on approximately day 1, day 3, day 6, and weekly for the
first month of discharge, and at approximately 30-day intervals after that. In accordance with the
MCP (310 CMR 40.0045[4][a]&[b]), hydraulic containment of groundwater will be maintained so
that the up-gradient discharge of dewatering effluent to the recharge area is contained or
recaptured within the boundaries of the Site. The contractor will prepare a recharge area design
for approval by the LSP and Wynn MA, and in compliance with the HASP.
A preliminary review of groundwater data from the CES-2 Area suggests that, in order to meet
effluent limits, the treatment train will likely include equalization, metals precipitation through
clarification, filtration and sludge management, cyanide destruction through a two stage
oxidation process, arsenic polishing by ion exchange or adsorbent resin, and neutralization. Bench
scale testing of the proposed effluent treatment will be conducted to assess treatment options
and effectiveness.
Dewatering water, treated or not, that does not meet any one of the discharge criteria may be
transported off-site for disposal under an appropriate waste manifest.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN
The following environmental monitoring plan will be implemented during RAM activities at the
Site.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
—
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 16
WORK ZONE AIR MONITORING
Real time particulate (dust) monitoring will be conducted within the work zone during soil
excavation and handling activities using a direct reading instrument (TSI Dusttrack II Aerosol
Monitor 8530 or equivalent) for particulate matter. Although air monitoring during the bench
scale ISS program conducted by KEMRON did not indicate detectable concentrations of hydrogen
cyanide (HCN) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) during the mixing process, real time monitoring for HCN
and H2S will be conducted during ISS implementation using a MultiRAE Lite Model PGM 620X or
equivalent.
PERIMETER AIR MONITORING
The work zone monitoring will be augmented with an AirLogics automated real-time Site perimeter
air monitoring system operated throughout the duration of the remedial work. The data collected
by the AirLogics system will be used to evaluate compliance with the Site perimeter limits for total
VOCs and dust described below, and to identify any need to suspend or modify remediation
activities as a result of RAM-related air emissions. The perimeter air monitoring system will
operate on a continuous, 24-hour basis until soil excavation and stabilization activities associated
with the RAM have been completed.
The automated perimeter air monitoring system will consist of eight individual monitoring
stations with associated analytical instrumentation, a meteorological system, a computer control
system, and an alarm system linked to the analytical instrumentation by an integrated
communication/telemetry package. The meteorological station will be used to identify which
stations are upwind, downwind, or crosswind of Site activities on a real-time basis. Proposed air
monitoring system locations are indicated on Figure 3.
The analytical instrumentation within each perimeter station will consist of a total volatile organic
photoionization detector (PID) for the measurement of total VOCs (TVOCs), and a respirable particulate
meter for the measurement of dust as a surrogate for polynuclear artomatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and
metals. The PIDs, along with the Respirable Particulate Meters, are housed in weather-tight enclosures.
The system operates on solar power, and is configured with on-board battery backup. The following is
a description of each of the key analytical instruments:
• Photoionization Detector
Volatile organic substance concentrations are measured utilizing portable photoionization
detectors (Photovac 2020 PID). The PIDs measure volatile organic compounds by passing the air
sample past an analytical detector and electronically measuring the resulting response. The PIDs
are configured to respond to total organic compounds without differentiation of individual
compound concentrations. The limit of detection is 10 parts per billion by volume (ppbv).
• Respirable Particulates
Direct-reading real-time particulate meters (DustTrak) are used to monitor particulate (dust). The
measurement of dust levels is accomplished using infrared electromagnetic radiation to sense
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 17
airborne particles. The dust meter can be configured to respond only to dust particles < 10 micron
in diameter (PM10), dust particles < 2.5 microns (PM2.5), or total suspended particulate. For this
project, the particulate meters will be configured to measure PM 10. The limit of detection is
1 ug/m 3 (microgram per cubic meter).
• Meteorological System
An on-Site meteorological tower (RM Young sensors) is used to measure wind speed, direction,
dry-bulb temperature, and relative humidity. The central computer system receives continuous
information from the meteorological system and computes a 2-minute running average wind
speed and direction value. The 2-minute running average wind direction is used to identify which
of the monitoring stations is upwind, downwind, or crosswind. This information is stored
electronically, and printed out in daily reports.
• Computer Control System
Data generated by the instrumentation and the meteorological station, as well as operational
parameters, are continuously uploaded via radio telemetry links to a central computer system
which will be located in the project trailer or some other secure location with continuous electrical
power. The central computer system communicates with each perimeter monitoring station every
minute to obtain the latest data values from the individual sensors. The retrieved data are then
displayed on the central computer screen, and stored in a database along with the meteorological
data and other operational status information. The monitoring data is automatically archived and
used to print out summary graphs at the end of each day.
• Communications
The system utilizes a proprietary software package to allow for communication between the
instruments, environmental control equipment, meteorological station, alarm display, and the
central computer. Communication is accomplished with radio telemetry links operating on a fixed
frequency licensed to AirLogics by the FCC.
The system will be configured to generate 15-minute time-weighted averages of TVOC and
particulate levels. This set-up will include alarm conditions for TVOCs of 1 ppm and for PM10 of
either 75 pg/m3 over upwind background (for the CES-2 Area) or 150 pg/m3 over upwind
background (for the A-5 and Low pH Areas), along with warning level alarms designed to alert
project personnel of potential air quality issues. Daily reports depicting a graphical summary of the
results of the real time monitoring will be automatically printed out at the end of each day, and
GZA's on-Site personnel will prepare a daily summary of AirLogics system data. Daily summary
sheets will be included in the subsequent RAM Status Reports and/or Completion Report.
The particulate PM10 action levels were selected based on National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Massachusetts Ambient Air Quality Standards (MAAQS) over a 24-hour period. By
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 18
using the 24-hour average as a 15-minute alarm condition, elevated particulate concentrations can
be addressed prior to having an exceedance of the NAAQS/MAAQS values or the action levels.
In order to establish the PM10 action level, GZA developed soil-derived dust exposure point
concentrations (EPCs) for each of the three remediation areas. The EPCs were generated using the
PM10 action levels and the arithmetic mean concentrations! of soil analytical data from each of
the three remediation areas, but limited to those depths that will be disturbed during remediation
(i.e., the top ten feet for the A-5 Area, the top 15 feet for the CES-2 Area, and the top 15 feet for
the Low pH Area). Documentation of the risk evaluation is included in Appendix J.
Should VOC or PM10 action levels be exceeded in any 15-minute interval, work within the RAM
areas will be halted to assess the potential cause or causes of the exceedance and corrective actions
will be taken as necessary. Corrective actions may include, but are not limited to, alteration of work
practices to minimize dust generation or application of water for dust suppression.
REQUIRED PERMITS
The following permits have been identified as required to implement this RAM:
• A WPA Order of Conditions (MassDEP File # 022-0095), received as noted above.
• The application of remedial additives (e.g., Portland cement used during ISS) within 50 feet of
any surface water body or any tributary thereto requires approval by MassDEP. A written
plan for the application of remedial additives is presented below. Approval, conditional
approval, or denial of the plan by MassDEP must be provide within 30 days of receipt;
however, approval of the plan is presumed if MassDEP does not issue a written approval or
denial within that timeframe.
• DigSafe will be notified by the contractor.
GZA has not identified any additional permits that will be required for the proposed work.
LSP SEAL AND SIGNATURE
The seal and signature of the Licensed Site Professional (LSP) for this RAM Plan
(Lawrence Feldman, LSP #8107) are provided on the attached transmittal forms in Appendix A.
1 For certain constituents of concern (COCs), the maximum detected concentrations were used as the
EPCs due to the relatively small sample size and/or the elevated laboratory reporting limits for the non-
detected results.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 19
CERTIFICATION FOR GREATER THAN 1500 CUBIC YARDS OF SOIL [310 CMR 40.0444(1)(H)]
In accordance with Section 40.0442(5) of the MCP, Wynn MA has indicated that it has sufficient
financial resources to manage greater than 1,500 cubic yards of excavated materials in the
manner and time frames specified in 310 CMR 40.0030.
APPLICATION OF REMEDIAL ADDITIVES NEAR SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
As indicated by 310 CMR 40.0046(3)(a)(4) and 40.0046(3)(b), a written plan for the application of
Remedial Additives must be submitted to MassDEP for the application of Remedial Additives
within 50 feet of any surface water body or tributary of a surface water body. The ISS process to
be employed at the Site will include the application of Portland cement, which can be considered
a Remedial Additive, and as previously documented, the Mystic River adjoins the Site to the
southwest. Portions of the Low pH Area, where ISS will be undertaken, are within 50 feet of the
Mystic River. Based on the anticipated volume of soil requiring ISS, and the projected mixture of
6% Type I Portland cement by weight, GZA estimates that approximately 1,800 tons of Portland
cement will be utilized. The application of Remedial Additives for the purposes of this RAM is a
"one-time" event that will be completed over a period of approximately two to three months. As
indicated above, the ISS treatment zone will extend from the bottom of the excavation (i.e., 4 feet
bgs) to approximately 1 foot into the silty sand unit underlying the fill material. Groundwater in
the treatment area has been measured at between 5 and 6 feet bgs.
As noted above, a sheet pile wall will be installed along the waterside limit of the ISS area to
provide bank stability, minimize groundwater infiltration, and prevent or minimize the potential
migration of stabilization chemicals introduced into the subsurface during the ISS process. During
ISS implementation, potential changes to local groundwater quality are likely to include an
increase in pH and alkalinity. However, given the installation of the sheet pile wall, and the nature
of the remedial additive, GZA does not anticipate an adverse impact on the Mystic River related
to the proposed remediation. However, visual observations of both the Mystic River and the
Coastal Bank outside of the sheet pile wall will be conducted on a daily basis during ISS
implementation to detect the breakout of remedial additives.
Groundwater flow direction is not anticipated to be significantly altered during ISS
implementation; however, shallow groundwater flow will be impacted after the stabilized
monolith has been created. GZA anticipates that shallow groundwater post-remediation will be
redirected around the monolith through untreated soils that will have hydraulic conductivities
one to two orders of magnitude higher than the ISS area. Subsequent to completion of the ISS
field program, a network of monitoring wells will be installed along the perimeter of the treated
area to assess groundwater conditions.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Public involvement activities have been conducted in accordance with 310 CMR 40.1403(3)(d).
Copies of the notices are included as Appendix K.
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
August 18, 2015
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
File No. 01.0171521.10
Page / 20
If you should require any further information concerning the planned RAM activities, please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (781) 278-3700.
Very truly yours,
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Senior Project Manager
Albert J. Ricciardelli
Consultant/Reviewer
Lawrence Feldman, LSP
Senior Principal
Attachments:
Table 1
Soil Analytical Data (Area 5)
Table 2
Groundwater Analytical Data (Low pH Area)
Figure 1
Site Locus
Figure 2
Site Plan
Figure 3
Proposed Pre-Construction Release Abatement Measure
(RAM) Remediation Areas
Appendix A
Limitations
Appendix B
Transmittal Form BWSC106
Appendix C
PIP Comments and Responses to Comments
Appendix D
MassGIS Map
Appendix E
Boring Logs
Appendix F
Laboratory Analytical Data
Appendix G
K Test Data
Appendix H
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan
Appendix 1
Excavated Materials Management Plan
Appendix J
PM10 Risk Evaluation Tables
Appendix K
Public Notification
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-10.DEL\RAM Plan - Pre-Construction\Wynn Everett RAM Plan 8-18-15 Final.docx
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/VIH
GZA File No . 01 . 0171521.10
[Date]
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results
A-5 Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Boring ID
GZ101
GZ102
GZ103
Sample
GZ101S01S02
GZ101S03S04
GZ101S05S06
GZ101S07S08
GZ101S09S10
GZ101S11S12
GZ102S01S02
GZ102S03S04
GZ102S05S06
GZ102S07S08
GZ102S09S10
GZ103S01S02
GZ103S03S04
GZ103S05S06
GZ103S06S07
GZ103SO8SO9
GZ103S10S11
Sample Depth [Ft BGS]
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-11
Sample Date
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
10 / 31/2014
Arsenic
151
10.8
4750
133
6.08
9.12
697
13500
10400
6470
39.5
17.5
280
74.1
317
2420
11.4
Lead
1170
153
4640
112
7.74
13.7
631
21900
14900
5110
62.1
197
2590
620
777
70.4
13.8
Nets*:
1. All results are presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), i.e. parts per million (ppm).
2. Analytes detected above laboratory reporting limits are shown in bold.
3. Concentrations detected above Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) S-2 Soil & GW-2 Standards are highlighted in yellow. Concentrations detected above MCP Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) are highlighted in orange.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-10 ^Laboratory Analyt.cal
Data\A-5 Area Soil Samples\Table 1 - GZA A-5 Area Samples.xls*
GZA File No 01.0171521.10
[Date]
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results
A-5 Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Boring ID
GZ104
GZ105
GZ106
Sample
GZ104S01S02
GZ104S03S04
GZ104S0SS06
GZ104S07S08
GZ104S09S10
GZ105S01S02
GZ105S03S04
GZ105S05S06
GZ105S07S08
GZ105S09S10
GZ10SS11S12
GZ106S01S02
GZ106S03S04
GZ106S05S06
GZ106S07S08
GZ106S09S10
GZ106S11S12
Sample Depth (Ft BGS]
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
Sample Date
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
Arsenic
22.1
1050
524
8.98
13.7
15.5
52.6
49.8
138
529
20.6
23.4
50.1
188
809
15.5
13.4
Lead
527
5390
3440
61.2
27.9
680
682
402
459
94.6
14.7
330
1270
4850
2890
73.4
22.3
J:\l 70,000-179,999\171521\171521-10
D€L\Laboratory Analytical Data\A-S Area Soil Samples\Table 1 6ZA A 5 Area Sample* xKx
GZA File No. 01.0171521.10
[Date]
Tabic 1
Soil Analytical Results
A-5 Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Boring ID
GZ107
GZ108
Sample
GZ107 SO ISO 2
GZ107S03S04
GZ107S05S06
GZ107S07S08
GZ107S09S10
GZ107S11S12
GZ108S01S02
GZ108S03S04
GZ108S05S06
GZ108S07
GZ108S08
GZ108S09S10
GZ108S11S12
Sample Depth [Ft BGS]
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-7
7-8
8-10
10-12
Sample Date
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
Arsenic
10.6
101
83.9
268
5.56
11.9
17.7
45.6
151
202
448
46.8
7.67
Lead
191
818
730
813
11.4
13.5
215
710
1380
2300
682
178
10.1
J:\l 70,000-179,999\171521\171521-10
DEl\l 3 borat<xy Analytical Data\A-5 Area Soil SamplesVTable 1 - GZA A 5 Area Samples.xlsx
GZA File No. 01.0171521.10
(Date)
Table 1
Soli Analytical Results
A-5 Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Boring ID
GZ109
GZ110
GZ111
Sample
GZ109S01S02
GZ109S03S04
GZ109S05
GZ109S06
GZ109S07S08
GZ109S09S10
GZ109S11S12
GZ110S01S02
GZ110S03S04
GZ110S05S06
GZ110S07S08
GZ110S09S10
GZ110S11S12
GZ11 ISO 1502
GZ111S03S04
GZ111S05S06
GZ111S07
GZ111S09S10
GZ111S11S12
Sample Depth [Ft BGS]
0-2
2-4
4-5
5-6
7-8
8-10
10-12
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
0-2 ‘
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
Sample Date
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
10/31/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
Arsenic
10.6
41.2
19.3
50.3
603
43.6
17
16.8
26.2
41.4
337
50.6
13.5
45
339
1160
1040
3.86
12.4
Lead
418
1830
456
63.5
191
586
17.5
312
1820
2500
4080
829
25.2
843
10600
13400
2450
7.1
18
J:\l 70,000-179,999\171521\171521-10
DElAUboratcry Analyt.cai Dau\A-5 Vea Soil Samples\Table 1 GIA A 5 Area Samples xB»
GZA File No. 01.0171521.10
[Date]
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results
A-5 Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Boring ID
GZ112
MCP Standards
Sample
GZ112S01S02
GZ112S03S04
GZ112S05S06
GZ112S07S08
GZ112S09S10
GZ112S11S12
MCP S-2 Soil & GW-2
UCL
Sample Depth [Ft BGS]
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
Sample Date
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
11/3/2014
Arsenic
10.5
138
694
11.2
24.8
21.7
20
500
Lead
451
4590
8110
30.8
39.1
48.4
600
9000
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-10
DElALaboratory Analytical DataVA-S Area Soil Samples\Table 1 GZA A-5 Area Samples.xlsx
GZA File No. 01.0171521.10
[Date]
Table 2
Groundwater Analytical Results
Low pH Area
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Well ID:
Date:
GZ201
11/13/2014
GZ202
11/13/2014
GZ203
11/13/2014
GZ204
11/13/2014
GZ205
11/13/2014
GZ206
11/13/2014
GZ207
11/13/2014
GZ208
11/13/2014
GZ209
11/13/2014
GZ210
11/13/2014
GZ211
11/13/2014
GZ212
11/13/2014
GZ213
11/13/2014
GZ214
11/13/2014
M<
Method 1 GW-3
3P
UCL
RCRA 8 Metals
Barium
42.5
46.5
33.1
28.7
26.7
46.9
49.4
50.8
33.0
38.8
29.0
28.5
32.5
47.2
<2.5
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
50000
100000
Cadmium
<2.5
4.8
<2.5
<2.5
<2.5
6.6
3.1
20.7
5.9
3.7
25.4
42.2
45.1
4
300
10
^nno
Chromium
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
19.5
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
150
1000
9000
Lead
<10.0
49.2
<20.0
<10.0
<20.0
<10.0
<20.0
<20.0
17.3
47.6
27.0
<10.0
14.2
Silver
Arsenic
Selenium
Mercury
<5.0
27 7
<10.0
586
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
4 9
<5.0
8.0
<5.0
8.8
<5 0
<5 0
<5.0
<10.0
<10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
(
583
38.2
28.6
572
310
2300
3740
4370
193
900
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
0.3
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
<5.0
<0.20
100
20
100000
200
pH- Field Data
pH- Lab Data
5.73
5.56
5.79
5.62
7.76
7.03
5.50
5.40
7.57
6.78
5.70
5.61
5.73
5.56
6.43
6.33
5.02
4.82
3.24
3.19
4.69
4.80
5.26
5.24
5.76
5.78
5.70
5.62
--
-
Notes:
1. RCRA 8 metals results are presented in micrograms per liter (ug/L). ^ . .. .. ..
2. Analytes detected above laboratory reporting limits are shown in bold. Concentrations above Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 GW-3 Standards are highlighted in yellow. No concentrations were detected above MCP Upper Concentration Limits (UGL)
3. < indicated an analyte was not detected above laboratory repoting limits; -- indicates that an analyte does not have an applicable MCP standard.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-10.DEL\Laboratory Analytical
Data\Groundwater\Table 2 - Low pH Area Groundwater Results Highlighted xls
FIGURES
©2014 - GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., J:\170.000-179,999\171521\171521-05.DEL\FIGURES\GIS\MXDs\171521-05_LocusPlan_1HorizonWayEverett_FIG1 mxd, 10/14/2014, 1:00:54 PM, Elaine.donohue
Radio Towers'
•<WEE»V-
OwjHfl
Theaers
*£, Looteut Tower
CO
Tobin Mem BnageY
. XDcwb* DecO
Boston
Inner
Society, i-cubed
pm \\ Harbor
USGS QUADRANGLE LOCATION
SOURCE : THIS MAP CONTAINS THE ESRI ARCGIS ONLINE USA
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SERVICE, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 12, 2009
BY ESRI ARCIMS SERVICES AND UPDATED AS NEEDED. THIS
SERVICE USES UNIFORM NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED DATUM
AND CARTOGRAPHY STANDARDS AND A VARIETY OF
AVAILABLE SOURCES FROM SEVERAL DATA PROVIDERS.
Data Supplied by
esri
N
\+p"\
1,000 2,000 4,000
~SCALE IN FEET
6,000
-1
oz\
PROJ. MGR.: DEL
DESIGNED BY: DEL
REVIEWED BY: LF
OPERATOR: EMD
DATE: 10-14-2014
LOCUS PLAN
1 HORIZON WAY
EVERETT, MASSACHUSETTS
JOB NO.
01 . 0171521.05
FIGURE NO.
© 2015 - GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. J \170.000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\FIGURES\GIS\MXDs\171521_EXPLORATION-LOCATION v2B mxd, 8/18/2015, 1 32 35 PM Stephen washburn
DR113]
SO EEC
EEE3SB
'* •uSaa
©22©S ESSS 1 E220Q namra G3®8
0 * 0*0 o
# 8® gffl ES3E3
SM §£2C
< o® 9 ,« ° sa
aaBS ? <SE> (ggara frora
t- »" .■
ossea o
•aesssa?
USDS g<0
o si ara f to
tasos
- ©©
' o
W 4 Q
sms
»
ysms
EsSBS?
, sm$
ESSCBO
ouBiwesE®
G 2122 ® EB5a , CEB3E
«* 'Prara/V _
liTOPH
GSatEa ^ ggg
• .
e® '
USSBOS
©a
■uSKS©--. irarara
lififlKD
«®®a J" J®®*
S&3& Gas®
BS203O O'#
aso© >e»a®
o
oaac
S5S3Q ggn ETT i ^ a n e® §22230 §22230 <^©022233
.* * mm '' e©^ °
sssai
2SSS0 gr re afl §2223© _^§22330 ^
®E5E ,* fl
e© * ^ ’ ' ess • g
o raramr -
©as ®oaa ©a °
• o ®
D SS5P© EsBflO&a
® O
grias .*• „■«*
* GssDsa @^opa essoow
@3539.0 >3 o
^ es gg^ a53 o a30<2$ae ES5KE28
oaassy\ °
HSSD33EI0S)
SSaSK)
ggpS ‘332900
GSuKB
©3
S3
o
ESCEC ES3BC
0 R€3
NEEEJESau
03®
ES30D3
00355653
°
a
, «*. y / *
1SSBSP
S3
E®3©
O
SS22T3
EBS®sa55Sa
«f O . uSS23
(3B0E3 '
' UL= ^ J GB3Q
G2QS O
iO* ' f-TTya
E2E3S®
sssa * ess© __
PT5*^)g> O “ ~ _0 . ■ I" - • *"
J 3339 DSSES ..—•J-’—T
.-M-* 1 *** 1
_ V \ - -
—
i Ititth't ‘ %
HMbsr 7 * ™
..“a sms oaasaa
&s ^ ,»
g^&tti&ee (am
3 ^3E3 ^^60 «
« GaEOTE3 °
Agg O _ nv^ra oO0Si23E3 ^S© «
OE3 EEQ • /
G9® • O^ge /•
°.8© ^ /
° •
s ■■ ■alii ■©!
ESSKKHD
R 5
SOURCE
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE DISPOSAL SITE BOUNDARY GEI / HISTORICAL EXPLORATIONS GEI / HISTORICAL EXPLORATIONS
® GEI BORING ® HISTORIC BORING
GZA EXPLORATIONS
1. GZA EXPLORATION LOCATIONS WERE LOCATED USING
A TRIMBLE GEOXH 3.5G EDITION GPS UNIT ALL OTHER
LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY GEI CONSULTANTS. INC.
WYNN EVERETT
EVERETT, MA
EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN
SHALLOW ENVIRONMENTAL BORING
^ LOW PH MONITORING WELL
GEI TEMPORARY WELL
E| GEI TEST PIT
GEI WELL
HISTORIC SURFACE SOIL
HISTORIC TEST PIT
HISTORIC WELL
TEMPORARY WELLS
140
SCALE IN FEET
PREPARED BY
^^NGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
] Engineers and Scientists
www.gza.com
PREPARED FOR
PROJ MGR DEL
REVIEWED BY DEL
CHECKED BY DEL
FIGURE
DESIGNED BY DEL
DRAWN BY SMW
SCALE 1 INCH = 70 FT
o
DATE
08-18-2015
PROJECT NO.
01.0171521.10
REVISION NO
2
TGW313
CESrS
CLo
GZ205
BZ203
GZ207
vV(-
Z112
B -
BOR
cts:e
BOR
RIZ
RIZ
B220
CESr.TR; 7
St37
F, MW 9
NW-1
Sr 39
ES-TP-8
S3
saw
B219
BOR 114
CES-TPI1
BOR115
S rJ
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED BY \M*ITTEN AGREEMENT THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF GZA
GEOENVIRONMENTAL. INC (GZA) THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS SOLELY FOR THE USE BY GZA’S
CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND LOCATION IDENTIFIED ON
THE DRAWING THE DRAWING SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED. REUSED. COPIED. OR ALTERED IN ANY MANNER FOR
USE AT ANY OTHER LOCATION OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF GZA. ANY
TRANSFER REUSE. OR MODIFICATION TO THE DRAWING BY THE CLIENT OR OTHERS. WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
EXPRESS CONSENT OF GZA. WILL BE AT THE USERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT ANY RISK OR LIABILITY TO GZA
TP-o
S?34
RiZ
CtSi
I
©2014 - GZA GeoEnvironmental. Inc. GZA-\\GZANOR\Jobs\) 70,000- 1 79,999\171521^71521 -10 DEL\CAD\2010-NEWBURYPQRT-jjz dwq [RAM Figure 3] May 27. 2015 - 2:35pm joshuotoll
.
SHEET PILE WALL
LOW pH AREA
CES-2 AREA
SEE INSET 1
SEE INSET 2
V ' - ;jy - - ^
\ / •
N —. /
_
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AREA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
AND RECHARGE AREA
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED BY WRITTEN AGREEMENT. THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF GZA
GEOENVIRONMENTAL. INC. (GZA). THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS SOLELY FOR USE BY GZA'S
CLIENT OR THE CLIENT'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND LOCATION IDENTIFIED ON
THE DRAWING THE DRAWING SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED. REUSED. COPIED, OR ALTERED IN ANY MANNER FOR
USE AT ANY OTHER LOCATION OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF GZA. ANY
TRANSFER. REUSE, OR MODIFICATION TO THE DRAWING BY THE CLIENT OR OTHERS. WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
EXPRESS CONSENT OF GZA, WILL BE AT THE USER'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT ANY RISK OR LIABILITY TO GZA
WYNN EVERETT
EVERETT, MASSACHUSETTS
PROPOSED PRE-CONSTRUCTION RELEASE ABATEMENT
MEASURE (RAM) REMEDIATION AREAS
PREPARED BY
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
www gza.com
PROJ MGR DEL
REVIEWED BY MH
CHECKED BY MH
DESIGNED BY MH
DRAWN BY JJZ
SCALE 1" = 80 FEET
DATE
05-27-2015
PROJECT NO
01.0171521.00
REVISION NO
FIGURE
240'
SOURCE:
1. THE BASE MAP WAS DEVELOPED FROM ELECTRONIC FILES PROVIDED BY FELDMAN,
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ON JANUARY 15. 2015, CAD FILE:
14517-EX-FBT-1-15-2015.DWG.
LEGEND
_ _ PROPOSED SHEET PILE WALL
_ . . - PROPOSED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL BARRIER
- RIVERFRONT AREA
TOP OF COASTAL BANK
- TOP OF COASTAL BANK (COINCIDENT WITH 100YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION)
100-FT BUFFER ZONE (FROM COASTAL BANK)
inn YFAR FLOOD ZONE AE (9 00' NAVD88) - FIRM PANEL 0439E, EFFECTIVE
_ DATE^UNE 4 2010 & FIRM PANEL 0014G, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPT 25, 2009
(FEMA WEB SITE)
COASTAL BEACH / TIDAL FLATS / LAND CONTAINING SHELLFISH
LAND UNDER THE OCEAN / LAND CONTAINING SHELLFISH
|||||p| SALT MARSH
_ MEAN HIGH WATER (4 35-NAVD88)
_MEAN LOW WATER (-5.21' NAVD88)
PROPOSED PERIMETER AIR MONITORING LOCATIONS
RIVERFRONT AREA
L EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL
^ MEAN HIGH WATER
L COASTAL BANK
(COINCIDENT WITH
100 YEAR FLOOD
ZONE AE (EL 9.0’)
INSET 1
^ 100 YEAR FLOOD
ZONE AE (EL 9.0'
SHEETPILE**^
>NT
WALL
RIVERFRONT
AREA
EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION
_ CONTROL
EXISTING -v ^ COASTAL
BANK
TIMBER
BULKHEAD
A
v MEAN HIGH WATER
_ (ALONG BULKHEAD)
MEAN LOW WATER
INSET 2
APPROXIMATE STAGING
AREA FOR ISS AND
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
PROPOSED
SEDIMENTATION AND
EROSION CONTROL
PROPOSED
SEDIMENTATION AND
EROSION CONTROL
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AREA
SHEET PILE WALL
A-5 AREA
APPENDIX A
LIMITATIONS
GEOHYDROLOGICAL LIMITATIONS
Use of Report
1. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) prepared this report on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of
our Client for the stated purpose(s) and location(s) identified in the Proposal for Services and/or
Report. Use of this report, in whole or in part, at other locations, or for other purposes, may lead to
inappropriate conclusions; and we do not accept any responsibility for the consequences of such
use(s). Further, reliance by any party not expressly identified in the agreement, for any use, without
our prior written permission, shall be at that party’s sole risk, and without any liability to GZA.
Standard of Care
2. GZA’s findings and conclusions are based on the work conducted as part of the Scope of
Services set forth in the Proposal for Services and/or Report and reflect our professional
judgment. These findings and conclusions must be considered not as scientific or
engineering certainties, but rather as our professional opinions concerning the limited data
gathered during the course of our work. Conditions other than described in this report may
be found at the subject location(s).
3. GZA’s services were performed using the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by
qualified professionals performing the same type of services, at the same time, under
similar conditions, at the same or a similar property. No warranty, expressed or implied, is
made. Specifically, GZA does not and cannot represent that the Site contains no hazardous
material, oil, or other latent condition beyond that observed by GZA during its study.
Additionally, GZA makes no warranty that any response action or recommended action will
achieve all of its objectives or that the findings of this study will be upheld by a local, state
or federal agency.
4. In conducting our work, GZA relied upon certain information made available by public
agencies, Client and/or others. GZA did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy
or completeness of that information. Inconsistencies in this information which we have
noted, if any, are discussed in the Report.
Subsurface Conditions
5. The generalized soil profile(s) provided in our Report are based on widely-spaced
subsurface explorations and are intended only to convey trends in subsurface conditions.
The boundaries between strata are approximate and idealized, and were based on our
assessment of subsurface conditions. The composition of strata, and the transitions
between strata, may be more variable and more complex than indicated. For more specific
information on soil conditions at a specific location refer to the exploration logs. The
nature and extent of variations between these explorations may not become evident until
further exploration or construction. If variations or other latent conditions then become
evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the conclusions and recommendations of this
report.
April 2012
PAGE 1
6. Water level readings have been made, as described in this Report, in and monitoring wells
at the specified times and under the stated conditions. These data have been reviewed and
interpretations have been made in this report. Fluctuations in the level of the groundwater
however occur due to temporal or spatial variations in areal recharge rates, soil
heterogeneities, the presence of subsurface utilities, and/or natural or artificially induced
perturbations. The observed water table may be other than indicated in the Report.
Compliance with Codes and Regulations
7. We used reasonable care in identifying and interpreting applicable codes and regulations
necessary to execute our scope of work. These codes and regulations are subject to various,
and possibly contradictory, interpretations. Interpretations and compliance with codes and
regulations by other parties is beyond our control.
Screening and Analytical Testing
8. GZA collected environmental samples at the locations identified in the Report. These
samples were analyzed for the specific parameters identified in the report. Additional
constituents, for which analyses were not conducted, may be present in soil, groundwater,
surface water, sediment and/or air. Future Site activities and uses may result in a
requirement for additional testing.
9. Our interpretation of field screening and laboratory data is presented in the Report. Unless
otherwise noted, we relied upon the laboratory’s QA/QC program to validate these data.
10. Variations in the types and concentrations of contaminants observed at a given location or
time may occur due to release mechanisms, disposal practices, changes in flow paths,
and/or the influence of various physical, chemical, biological or radiological processes.
Subsequently observed concentrations may be other than indicated in the Report.
Interpretation of Data
11. Our opinions are based on available information as described in the Report, and on our
professional judgment. Additional observations made over time, and/or space, may not
support the opinions provided in the Report.
Additional Information
12. In the event that the Client or others authorized to use this report obtain additional
information on environmental or hazardous waste issues at the Site not contained in this
report, such information shall be brought to GZA's attention forthwith. GZA will evaluate
such information and, on the basis of this evaluation, may modify the conclusions stated in
this report.
April 2012
PAGE 2
Additional Services
13. GZA recommends that we be retained to provide services during any future
investigations, design, implementation activities, construction, and/or property
development/ redevelopment at the Site. This will allow us the opportunity to: i) observe
conditions and compliance with our design concepts and opinions; ii) allow for changes
in the event that conditions are other than anticipated; iii) provide modifications to our
design; and iv) assess the consequences of changes in technologies and/or regulations.
Conceptual Site Model
14. Our opinions were developed, in part, based upon a comparison of site data to conditions
anticipated within our Conceptual Site Model (CSM). The CSM is based on available
information, and professional judgment. There are rarely sufficient data to develop a
unique CSM. Therefore observations over time, and/or space, may vary from those
depicted in the CSM provided in this report. In addition, the CSM should be evaluated and
refined (as appropriate) whenever significant new information and/or data is obtained.
Risk Characterization
15. Our risk evaluation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of
appropriate Federal and/or state regulatory agencies, and of other consultants undertaking
similar studies at the same time, for similar purposes, and under similar circumstances.
The findings of the risk evaluation are dependent on the numerous assumptions and
uncertainties inherent in the risk characterization process. Sources of the uncertainty may
include Site conditions; Site use; the nature, extent, concentration and distribution of
contaminants; and the available toxicity and/or health/risk based regulatory information.
Consequently, the findings of the risk characterization are not an absolute characterization
of actual risks; but rather serve to highlight potential incremental risks associated with
activities indicated in the Report. Actual risks may be other than indicated in the Report.
April 2012
PAGE 3
APPENDIX B
TRANSMITTAL FORM BWSC106
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
A. SITE LOCATION:
BWSC 106
Release Tracking Number
13341
1 . Site Name/Location Aid: EVERETT STAGING YARD
2. Street Address: 1 HORIZON WAY
3. City/Town: EVERETT 4. Zip Code: 021490000
F 5. Check here if the disposal site that is the source of the release is Tier Classified. Check the current Tier Classification
Category.
r a. Tier I F b. Tier ID F c. Tier II
B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply)
1. List Submittal Date of Initial RAM Plan (if previously submitted):
(mm/dd/yyyy)
F 2. Submit an Initial Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Plan.
r a. Check here if the RAM is being conducted as part of the construction of a permanent structure. If checked, you must
specify what type of permanent structure is to be erected in or in the immediate vicinity of the area where the RAM is to be
conducted.
b. Specify type of permanent structure: (check all that apply) r i. School F ii. Residential F iii. Commercial
r jv. Industrial F v . Other Specify. _
F 3 . Submit a Modified RAM Plan of a previously submitted RAM Plan.
F 4 . Submit a RAM Status Report.
F 5 . Submit a Remedial Monitoring Report. (This report can only be submitted through eDEP, concurrent with a RAM Status
Report.)
a. Type of Report: (check one) j initial Report F ii. Interim Report F iii. Final Report
b. Frequency of Submittal:
Ti. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted every six months, concurrent with a RAM Status Report,
r ii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted annually, concurrent with a RAM Status Report.
c. Number of Remedial Systems and/or Monitoring Programs:
A separate BWSC 106A, RAM Remedial Monitoring Report, must be filled out for each Remedial System
and/or Monitoring Program addressed by this transmittal form.
I - 6 . Submit a RAM Completion Statement.
F 7. Submit a Revised RAM Completion Statement.
8 . Provide Additional RTNs:
F a. Check here if this RAM Submittal covers additional Release Tracking Numbers (RTNs). RTNs that have been previously
linked to a Primary Tier Classified RTN do not need to be listed here. This section is intended to allow a RAM to cover more than
one unclassified RTN and not show permanent linkage to a Primary Tier Classified RTN.
b. Provide the additional Release Tracking Number(s)
covered by this RAM Submittal.
□■I
□ I
F 9 . Include in the RAM Plan or Modified RAM Plan a Plan for the Application of Remedial Additives near a sensitive receptor,
pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046(3).
(All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above)
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 1 of 6
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
BWSC 106
Release Tracking Number
3
13341
C. RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE CONDITIONS THAT WARRANT RAM:
1. Media Impacted and Receptors Affected: (check all that apply) 1“ a. Paved Surface T b. Basement 1“ c. School
I - d. Public Water Supply
f 7 j. Ground Water
r p. Soil Gas
r u. Others Specify:
I - e. Surface Water
I - k. Sediments
r q. Sub-Slab Soil Gas
I - f. Zone 2 V~ g. Private Well
H 1. Wetland i~ m. Storm Drain
I - r. Critical Exposure Pathway
r h. Residence
I - n. Indoor Ail
r s. NAPL
f 7 i. Soil
I - o. Air
r t. Unknown
2. Sources of the Release or TOR: (check all that apply)
l~ a. Transformer
I - b. Fuel Tank
r c. Pipe
I - d. OHM Delivery
r e. AST f~ f. Drums
f - g. Tanker Truck
I - h. Hose
U i. Line
r j. (JST Describe:
r k. Vehicle V~ 1.
Boat/V essel
m. Unknown
F n Other- HISTORIC FILL AND MANUFACTURING
3. Type of Release or TOR: (check all that apply)
I - a. Dumping
b. Fire f”
c. AST Removal
I - d. Overfill
I - e. Rupture
I - f. Vehicle Accident
r g. Leak
I - h. Spill r i. Test Failure
r j. TOR Only
I - k. UST Removal
Describe:
f - 1. Unknown
[7 m Other- HISTORIC FILL AND MANUFACTURING
4. Identify Oils and Hazardous Materials Released: (check all that apply) \7 a oils T~ b. Chlorinated Solvents
\7 c Heavy [7 d 0thers Specify: LOW PH IN GROUNDWATER
Metals
D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS:
r i . Assessment and/or Monitoring Only
I - 3. Deployment of Absorbent or Containment Materials
r 5. Structure Venting System/HVAC Modification System
r 7 . Product or NAPL Recovery
I - 9. Groundwater Treatment Systems
f 7 11. Remedial Additives
r 13. Active Exposure Pathway Mitigation System
r 15. Monitored Natural Attenuation
(check all that apply, for volumes list cumulative amounts)
I - 2. Temporary Covers or Caps
r* 4. Temporary Water Supplies
r 6. Temporary Evacuation or Relocation of Residents
r 8. Fencing and Sign Posting
r 10. Soil Vapor Extraction
r 12. Air Sparging
I - 14. Passive Exposure Pathway Mitigation System
r 16. In-Situ Chemical Oxidation
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 2 of 6
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
BWSC 106
Release Tracking Number
13341
D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS (cont.): (check all that apply, for volumes list cumulative amounts)
P 17. Excavation of Contaminated Soils
P a. Re-use, Recycling or Treatment
P i. On Site
Estimated volume in cubic yards
19000
I” ii. OffSite
Estimated volume in cubic yards
iia. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
iib. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
iii. Describe: N-SITU SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF SOILS
P b. Store
P i. On Site
Estimated volume in cubic yards
P ii. Off Site
Estimated volume in cubic yards
iia. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
iib. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
P c. Landfill
P i. Cover
Estimated volume in cubic yards
Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
P ii. Disposal
Estimated volume in cubic yards
8800
Receiving Facility: TBD
Town: TBD
State: MA
P 18. Removal of Drums, Tanks or Containers:
a. Describe Quantity and Amount:
b. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
c. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
P 19. Removal of Other Contaminated Media:
a. Specify Type and Volume:
b. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
c. Receiving Facility:
Town:
State:
P 20. Other Response Actions:
Describe:
P 21. Use of Innovative Technologies:
Describe:
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 3 of 6
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
BWSC 106
Release Tracking Number
3 ^
13341
E. LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP :
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and
all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of (i) the standard of care in
309 CMR 4.02( 1), (ii) the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2) and (3), and 309 CMR 4.03(2), and (iii) the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3),
to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
> if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Plan is being submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the
subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,
(ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of
M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this
submittal;
> if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Status Report and/or Remedial Monitoring Report is being
submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) is (are) being implemented in accordance with the applicable
provisions of M.G.L. c. 2 IE and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response
action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) comply (ies) with the identified provisions
of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal;
> if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Completion Statement is being submitted, the response action(s)
that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of
M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set
forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders,
permits, and approvals identified in this submittal:
I am aware that significant penalties may result, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, if I submit information which I
know to be false, inaccurate or materially incomplete.
1. LSP#:
2. First Name:
4. Telephone:
7. Signature:
8. Date:
8107
3. Last Name:
5. Ext:
8/18/2015 9. LSP Stamp:
(mm/dd/yyyy)
LAWRENCE
781-278-3700
LAWRENCE FELDMAN
FELDMAN
6. Email:
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 4 of 6
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
F. PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM:
BWSC 106
Release Tracking Number
13341
1. Check all that apply:
l - a. change in contact name
r b. change of address
F c. change in the person undertaking
response actions
2. Name of Organization:
WYNN MA, LLC
3. Contact First Name:
ROBERT
4. Last Name:
DESALVIO
5. Street:
3131 LAS VEGAS BLVD, SOUTH
6. Title:
PRESIDENT
7. City/Town:
LAS VEGAS
8. State: NV
9. ZIP Code:
891090000
10. Telephone:
702-770-7000
11. Ext:
12. Email:
robert.desalvio@wynnre
G. RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM:
F Check here to change relationship
F"l.RPorPRP F a. Owner I - b. Operator c. Generator F d. Transporter
r e. Other RP or PRP Specify: _
F 2. Fiduciary. Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G.L. c. 2IE, s. 2)
r 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, s. 5(j))
F 4. Any Other Person Undertaking RAM Specify Relationship. _
H. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS:
I - 1. Check here if any Remediation Waste, generated as a result of this RAM, will be stored, treated, managed, recycled or reused at
the site following submission of the RAM Completion Statement. You must submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan along with
the appropriate transmittal form (BWSC 108).
r 2 . Check here if the Response Action(s) on which this opinion is based, if any, are (were) subject to any order(s), permit(s) and/or
approval(s) issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked, you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof.
F 3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the implementation of a
Release Abatement Measure.
r 4. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect, e.g. Release Address/Location Aid. Send
corrections to bwsc.edep@state.ma.us.
r 5 . If a RAM Compliance Fee is required for this RAM, check here to certify that a RAM Compliance Fee was submitted to DEP, P. O.
Box 4062. Boston, MA 02211.
F 6. Check here to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts, data, and other information is attached.
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 5 of 6
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC 106
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Release Tracking Number
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE (RAM)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444 - 0446 (Subpart D)
I. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM:
1.1. ROBERT DESALVIO , attest under the pains and penalties of perjury (i) that I have personally examined and am familiar
with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form, (ii) that, based on my
inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained in this submittal is, to
the best of my know ledge and belief, true, accurate and complete, and (iii) that 1 am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the
entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are
significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete
information.
2. By: ROBERT DESALVIO 3. Title: PRESIDENT
(Signature)
4. For: WYNN MA, LLC 5. Date: 8/18/2015
13341
(Name of person or entity recorded in Section F) (mm/dd'yyyy)
f - 6. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section F.
7. Street:
8. City/Town: 9. State: 10. ZIP Code:
11. Telephone: 12. Ext: 13. Email:
YOU ARE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE FEE OF UP TO $10,000 PER
BILLABLE YEAR FOR THIS DISPOSAL SITE. YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT
SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,
YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE
Date Stamp (DEP USE ONLY:)
Received by DEP on
8/18/2015 3:58:57 PM
Revised: 8/5/2013
Page 6 of 6
APPENDIX C
PIP COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
Commenters
Comment Code
Entity or Individual
M&E-2
McCarter & English, 265 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110-3113, Leigh A.
Gilligan, Partner
Responses to Comments Received on Draft Release Abatement Measure Plan
M&E 2-1
Wynn and GZA have elected to perform the remedial actions at the Site via
multiple MCP Preliminary Response Actions rather than via the MCP's
Comprehensive Response Action process. Specifically, Wynn and GZA plan to
implement multiple Release Abatement Measures (RAMs) rather than
developing a comprehensive Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) in
accordance with 310 CMR 40.0870. As stated in the MCP (310 CMR 40.0405(3)),
"the purposes of Release Abatement Measures are to remediate limited or
localized releases, and/or to mitigate the impacts of larger releases until such
time as more comprehensive remedial actions can be instituted at the disposal
site, in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0800."
Please explain why a RAM Plan rather than a Phase IV RIP is being used to
implement remedial actions at the Site and how Wynn and GZA see this
approach as consistent with 310 CMR 40.0405(3). Please address specifically
why a Preliminary Response Action approach has been selected when the
Comprehensive Response Action process (i.e., completion of Phase II and Phase
III evaluations) is already in progress for the Site, and the results of same are
plainly being relied upon by GZA. This seems to be a significant distinction
between the use of RAMs on other larger scale projects where comprehensive
response actions have not yet commenced or been as far along.
Resoonse: The proposed RAM will remediate longstanding localized conditions
in three distinct areas in order to reduce risk on an accelerated schedule which,
as the commenter recognizes, is a completely appropriate use of a RAM as
specifically authorized by the MCP. Further response actions on the land-side
portion of the Site will be the subject of a second RAM. The use of RAMs for
significant site remediation activities is common, and the approach being taken
on the project site is not unusual. This approach has been discussed with, and
approved by, MassDEP. As requested by MassDEP, response actions for the
water-side portion of the Site will involve the preparation of a supplemental
Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment, a supplemental Phase III Identification,
Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Remedial Action Alternatives, a
Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan, and a Phase IV Completion Statement,
all in accordance with the MCP.
M&E 2-2
The most recent publicly documented Risk Characterization was conducted as
part of the Phase III Remedial Action Plan (GEI, 2013). However, Wynn and GZA
have collected additional soil and groundwater samples since that Risk
Characterization was completed.
Please explain how data for the samples collected since the 2013 Risk
Characterization update and impact the findings and conclusions of the 2013
Risk Characterization. Specifically, please describe how exposure point
concentrations and associated quantitative risk estimates are impacted by these
additional data.
Response: The data collected since the 2013 Risk Characterization are generally
consistent with the earlier data. The evaluation of risk related to the potential
generation of dust in connection with the RAM activities is presented in
Appendix J to the RAM Plan, the PM 10 Risk Evaluation Tables. Otherwise, the
GEI Risk Characterization is sufficient pending further risk characterization that
will be completed upon the completion of response actions at the Site. See also
response the response to M&E 2-23 below..
M&E 2-3
The Stage 1 and II Environmental Risk Characterization prepared by Menzie-Cura
& Associates, Inc. (MCA) (2006) stated that a condition of Substantial Hazard
existed due to "continuing discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface
water where the levels of oil or hazardous material attributable to the release
already exceed Massachusetts Surface Water Standards" (MCA, 2006). A
condition of Substantial Hazard has continued to exist almost 10 years after it
was identified.
Please explain how Wynn plans to address this Substantial Hazard.
Response: The continuing discharge referenced bv MCA is associated with
conditions in the Low pH area. That is why GZA has focused remediation in this
portion of the Site on the area where the groundwater has a pH lower than 4.
The RAM in the Low pH Area will immediately address this longstanding
condition by increasing the pH of the groundwater in the Low pH Area and
reducing the permeability of the soil in that Area, both of which will serve to
reduce the concentrations of site-related dissolved metals being discharged to
surface water.
M&E2-4
4. The Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment (GEI, 2012) concluded from
MCA's Stage II Ecological Risk Characterization (2006) that "[t]he sediments near
the Site pose a significant risk of harm to the benthic (i.e. sediment-dwelling)
invertebrate community at the Site. Concentrations of arsenic and copper in the
softshell clam from the Site exceeded the levels associated with toxicological
effects to benthic invertebrates. The results of the chronic sediment toxicity
tests in four of the five samples showed significantly reduced survival, growth,
or reproduction relative to "local conditions" samples," (GEI, 2012). The Draft
RAM Plan states that "remediation planned on the land-side portion of the Site
is likelv to change conditions on the water-side portion of thp SitP M (pmph^k
supplied).
Please explain how the remediation of the land-side portion of the Site is
expected to change conditions on the water-side portion of the Site.
Additionally, please describe specifically what effect the remedial actions are
expected to have on copper concentrations in surface water and sediment and
the basis for these expectations in light of the fact that the leachate testing
performed for the in-situ stabilization (ISS) mixture did not include copper.
Response: The referenced quotation was from the GEI Phase III report regarding
its selection of a Temporary Solution for the water-side portion of the Site. The
entire sentence, as it appears in the RAM Plan, is:
For the woter-side portion of the Disposal Site, GEI selected "Further Assessment
and Monitoring" as the recommended RAA, indicating that this approach would
initially result in a Temporary Solution, but that the "remediation planned on the
landside portion of the Site is likely to change conditions on the waterside portion
of the Site and this RAA will allow the impact of those changes to be evaluated."
Wynn MA intends to achieve a Permanent Solution for the water-side portion of
the Site by removing and capping impacted sediments. Further details
concerning more recent surface water and sediment data, and potential
comprehensive response actions for addressing that data, will be presented in
the forthcoming supplemental Phase II and Phase III reports for the water-side
portion of the Site.
M&E 2-5
5. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (GEI, 2013) indicates that a Temporary
Solution may be achieved for the water-side portion of the Site.
Please explain whether Wynn plans to achieve a Temporary Solution or a
Permanent Solution for the water-side portion of the Site.
Response: Wynn MA intends to achieve a Permanent Solution for the entire
Site, including the water-side portion.
M&E 2-6
6. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (GEI, 2013) included a post
remediation risk characterization to evaluate potential risks following
implementation of the selected Remedial Action Alternative. This risk
characterization identified Significant Risks after remediation for the following
receptors: future hypothetical park visitor, future hypothetical resident, and
future construction worker.
Please describe possible remedial alternatives that could be implemented to
address these identified significant risks, and please provide a comparison of the
costs to eliminate these risks, without relying on an Activity and Use Limitation
(AUL) to do so, relative to the cost of the planned remedy which leaves
significant contamination (and associated risk) in place at the Site.
Response: Given the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination on the
land-side portion of the Site, there is no remedial alternative that would achieve
a Condition of No Significant Risk for that portion of the Site without an Activity
and Use Limitation that would also be consistent with the evaluation criteria
specified by the MCP. There will be no significant risks upon the completion of
the remediation, the construction of the Wynn Resort in Everett, and the
imposition of the Activity and Use Limitation.
M&E2-7
7. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (GEI, 2013) did not include an
evaluation of remedial alternatives that would achieve or approach background
conditions.
Please describe possible remedial alternatives that could be implemented to
achieve or approach background conditions at the Site, and please provide a
comparison of the costs to achieve background relative to the cost of the
planned remedy.
Response: Given the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination on the
land-side portion of the Site, and considering the criteria for the requested
evaluation as specified by the MCP, it is not feasible to achieve or approach
background conditions for that portion of the Site .
M&E 2-8
8. The Draft RAM Plan states that "the Phase III RAP identified three areas of
concern to be addressed to reach a Permanent Solution under the MCP on the
land-side portion of the Site" (GZA, 2015). The Phase III (RAP) also stipulates that
an achievement of a Permanent Solution is dependent on an AUL.
Please describe in detail what conditions will be included in the AUL (i.e.,
activities and uses that will be prohibited in order to maintain a condition of No
Significant Risk and obligations and conditions that will be imposed by the AUL).
Response: The substance of the AUL will be determined upon the completion of
response actions at the Site. However, given the nature of the contaminants at
the Site, the AUL will focus on the prevention of uncontrolled exposure to
contaminated soil remaining on the land-side portion of the Site. To prevent
such exposure, the AUL will require buildings, pavement, and/or clean fill to limit
inadvertent exposure to contaminated soil, as well as the adherence to a Health
and Safety Plan and a Soil Management Plan during activities that might expose
that soil.
M&E 2-9
9. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states the following remedial objectives:
Location
Remedial Objective Description
Media
Primary
Constituents
of Concern
A-5 Area
• Reduce soil concentrations to
below UCLs
Soil
Arsenic
Lead
• Remove soil with arsenic and
lead concentrations similar to
sample A-5
• Reduce risk for future
construction workers
CES-2
Area
• Remove potential source
material
• Reduce groundwater
concentrations to below UCLs
• Reduce risk for future
construction workers
Soil
Groundwater
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH
Area
• Treat potential source
material
• Reduce groundwater
concentrations to below UCLs
• Adjust pH to greater than
approximately 4
Soil
Groundwater
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH
Please explain how the proposed remedial actions will achieve the remedial
objectives of reducing soil and groundwater concentrations below UCLs,
removing potential source material, removing soil with arsenic and lead
concentrations similar to sample A-5, and reducing risk for future construction
works.
Please explain how it will be demonstrated that the remedial objectives have
been achieved following completion of the remedial activities.
Resoonse: For both the A-5 Area and CES-2 Area, the proposed RAM activities
consist of the excavation and off-site disposal of soils exhibiting elevated
concentrations of the contaminants of concern in those areas. This will reduce
the risk for construction workers who may otherwise be exposed to those soils.
As indicated in the RAM Plan, average concentrations of lead and arsenic in the
samples bounding the A-5 Area are already below UCLs, and the excavation of
soils at CES-2 will continue until the average post-excavation concentrations of
the contaminants of concern are below the UCLs. Groundwater sampling will be
conducted in the CES-2 Area and the Low pH Area to confirm the achievement
of the remedial objectives for groundwater.
M&E 2-10
10. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that "based on the analytical data
developed as part of recent assessment activities, the A-5 Area has been
expanded southerly to include exploration locations GZ101, GZ102 and GZ103,
and is bounded by explorations A-5-2, A-5-3, A-5-4, A-5-5, A-5-6, GZ004, GZ006,
GZ007, GZ008, and GZ009" (GZA, 2015). As a point of clarification, should
samples GZ004, GZ006, GZ007, GZ008, and GZ009 be GZ104, GZ106, GZ107,
GZ108, and GZ109? It appears that several of the samples bounding the A-5 Area
excavation exceed UCLs for arsenic in soil, including A-5-3, GZ104, GZ106, and
GZ109.
Please explain the basis for leaving in place these soils that exceed UCLs and
how achievement of the remedial objective of reducing soil concentrations to
below UCLs will be demonstrated.
These sample locations do not appear to be included in Figure 3 - Proposed Pre-
Construction RAM Remediation Areas.
Please add these locations to the figure so that reviewers and the public can
confirm that the proposed areas shown are bounded as described in the text.
Response: That is correct; "GZ004, GZ006, GZ007, GZ0C8, and GZ009" should be
"GZ104, GZ106, GZ107, GZ108, and GZ109." Figure 2 has been revised to show
the areas of proposed excavation. Although soil in discrete locations above the
UCLs may remain after excavation, the average concentrations within the A-5
Area will be reduced to below the UCLs, as specified in the MCP.
M&E 2-11
11. Please explain how the boundaries of the proposed CES-2 Area excavation
were determined.
Response: The boundaries of the CES-2 excavation were determined using a
combination of soil and groundwater data, with a focus on locations with arsenic
concentrations in groundwater exceeding UCLs, and locations with arsenic
concentrations in soil exceeding the UCL or the acute risk value calculated in
GEI's Phase III report.
M&E 2-12
12. Please describe where concentrations above UCLs are expected to remain
following the proposed remedial actions and a list of the samples used to
characterize those areas.
Response: Following the completion of the RAM. the average soil
concentrations will be below UCLs. See also response to M&E 2-10.
M&E 2-13
13. Please explain the basis for sidewall and bottom sampling frequency in the
CES-2 and A-5 excavation areas.
Response: Confirmatory sampling is not anticipated in the A-S Arpa herancp
explorations have already bounded the area of elevated concentrations of the
contaminants of concern both vertically and horizontally. Confirmatory soil
samples will be obtained from the bottom of the excavation in the CES-2 Area.
The specific number of samples collected will be dependent on the final size of
the excavation. The soil samples will be analyzed for RCRA-8 metals to confirm
that the remedial objectives have been met.
M&E 2-14
14. One of the stated remedial objectives for the CES-2 Area is to reduce
groundwater concentrations to below UCLs; however, the Draft RAM Plan does
not include proposed monitoring of the groundwater following the excavation,
which would seem to be both prudent and necessary.
Please explain how it will be demonstrated that this remedial objective has been
achieved.
Response: Groundwater samples will be collected to demonstrate that the
remedial objective has been achieved.
M&E 2-15
15. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) does not include excavation designs for the
A-5 Area and CES-2 Area.
Please provide these designs for public comment.
Response: Final excavation designs for the A-5 Area and CES-2 Area will be
developed by the selected remediation contractor. Details regarding the
excavation designs will be included in the documents placed in the repositories,
and notice of the availability of these documents will be provided to those
individuals who express an interest.
M&E 2-16
16. Please describe how the boundaries of the Low pH Area were defined.
Response: The Low pH area includes all locations where the pH of groundwater
has been measured at or below 4.
M&E 2-17
17. Please describe how dust will be suppressed during ex-situ soil mixing
activities.
Response: The ex-situ treatment of soil will be limited to certain soils from the
CES-2 and A-5 Areas exhibit Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)
characteristics requiring such treatment prior to disposal. As discussed in the
RAM Plan, if ex-situ soil treatment is required, the treatment chemicals will be
applied in liquid form to minimize the potential for the generation of dust.
Consistent with the specifications being developed for the remedial contractor,
additional dust suppression measures will be implemented as necessary using
standard industry techniques, such as alteration of work practices to minimize
dust generation or application of water. Perimeter dust monitoring will be
conducted as described in the RAM Plan during all RAM activities, including any
ex-situ soil treatment.
M&E 2-18
18. Please quantify and describe the human health risks associated with ex-situ
mixing of soils containing lead concentrations that exceed the TCLP criterion.
Response: The average concentrations of contaminants detected in those soils
slated for ex-situ treatment are generally consistent with the soil exposure point
concentrations (EPCs) developed for the CES-2 Area. Accordingly, the same dust
action level of 75 pg/m 3 will be used during any ex-situ treatment. See RAM
Appendix J, as well as the responses to M&E 2-17 and M&E 2-23.
M&E2-19
19. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states, "in order to meet effluent limits, the
treatment train will likely include equalization, metals precipitation through
clarification, filtration and sludge management, cyanide destruction through a
two stage oxidation process, arsenic polishing by ion exchange or adsorbent
resin, and neutralization," (GZA, 2015).
Please provide the design of this treatment train for public comment.
Response: The specific design of the treatment train will be developed by the
selected remediation contractor. As described in the RAM Plan, the efficiency of
the treatment train will be assessed at regular intervals to confirm that the
discharge meets MCP GW-3 Standards. Details of the treatment train will be
included in documents placed in the repositories, and notice of the availability of
these documents will be provided to individuals who express an interest.
M&E 2-20
20. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that hydraulic containment of
groundwater will be maintained and the contractor will prepare a recharge area
design. Please provide the hydraulic containment design for public comment.
Response: The specific design of the hvdraulic containment will be developed
by the selected remediation contractor. Hydraulic containment will be
confirmed on an on-going basis using the existing monitoring well network at
the Site. Details of the hydraulic containment design will be included in
documents placed in the repositories, and notice of the availability of these
documents will be provided to individuals who express an interest.
M&E 2-21
21. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),
"particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) are referred to as
"fine" particles and are believed to pose the greatest health risks," (USEPA,
2015).
Please describe the basis for monitoring for PM 10 dust particles instead of or in
addition to PM2.5 and total suspended particulate.
Response: According to USEPA, the main sources of PM2.5 particles are
"combustion activities (motor vehicles, power plants, wood burning, etc.) and
certain industrial processes," while the main sources of "coarse" particles (i.e.,
particles with diameters between 2.5 and 10 micrometers) include "crushing or
grinding operations, and dust from paved or unpaved roadways"
(http://epa.gov/pmdesignations/faa.htm). Since the RAM activities fall in the
latter category, monitoring for PM 10 particles and not PM 2.5 particles is
appropriate.
M&E 2-22
22. Please describe the basis for the total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs)
action level of 1 parts per million (ppm) for the 15-minute time-weighted
average, and please explain how this action level will maintain a condition of No
Significant Risk in accordance with the MCP for nearby receptors during
construction.
Response: Based on the analytical data, GZA does not consider monitoring for
VOCs necessary to ensure a Condition of No Significant Risk for nearby receptors
in connection with the RAM activities because VOCs are not a contaminant of
concern in the RAM areas. However, the 1 ppm action level was retained as a
conservative measure.
M&E 2-23
23. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that the PM10 dust action levels were
selected based on National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and
Massachusetts Ambient Air Quality Standards (MAAQS) and that GZA developed
soil-derived dust exposure point concentrations (EPCs) for each of the
remediation areas.
Please describe how these values were used to select the PM 10 action levels.
Response: The National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM10 is 150
ug/m3 for a 24- hour period (http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html); the health-
based primary standard for PM10 is 150 ug/m3 averaged over a 24-hour period
based on the Massachusetts Ambient Air Quality Standards (MAAQS)
(http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/air/quality/particle-pollution-
and-air-quality.html).
GZA used the 150 ug/m3 standard to evaluate risks to commercial workers and
residents potentially impacted by dust generated during the remediation of the
A-5, Low pH, and CES-2 areas. For each area, GZA developed soil exposure point
concentrations (EPCs) generally based on the arithmetic mean
concentrations. GZA then estimated contaminant concentrations in dust by
multiplying the soil EPCs by the PM10 of 150 ug/m3 (and a unit conversion
factor). Based on this risk evaluation, GZA concluded that the 150 ug/m3 action
level would be sufficient to maintain a condition of No Significant Risk to the
noted potential receptors for the A-5 and Low pH Areas. However, for the CES-2
Area, a more stringent PM10 action level of 75 ug/m3 was selected to maintain
a Condition of No Significant Risk to the potential receptors. See also RAM Plan
Appendix J.
M&E 2-24
24. Please describe the required calibration methodology and frequency for the
air monitoring equipment and how calibration information will be documented.
Response: Each air monitoring station will be calibrated daily prior to the start
of invasive site work. Individual sensors within each monitoring station (PIDs
and particulate meters) will be calibrated daily according to the instrument
manufacturer's recommendations. The calibration procedure for the PID
consists of introducing non-VOC containing "zero air" to check the instrument
baseline zero, followed by the introduction of a known concentration of
calibration gas to verify correct instrument response. Particulate meters are
calibrated using a zero air filter on the inlet to verify instrument baseline
zero. The results of each calibration procedure are documented daily in a field
notebook maintained by the air monitoring technician.
M&E 2-25
25. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that "visual observations of both the
Mystic River and the Coastal Bank outside of the sheet pile wall will be
conducted on a daily basis during ISS implementation to assess for the breakout
of remedial additives," (GZA, 2015).
Please describe specifically how these visual observations will be able to assess
breakout of remedial additives. Please describe why sampling and analysis of the
nearby surface water (which would seem to be both prudent and necessary) was
not included in the RAM Plan to assess breakout of remedial additives.
Response: Visual observations indicating breakout would include observation of
seeps of soil/Portland cement mixes, sloughing of soils, or cloudy/discolored
plumes emanating from the shoreline. Field pH screening and the collection of
surface water samples for laboratory analysis will be conducted as necessary
based on any such visual observations.
M&E 2-26
26. The Health and Safety Plan (HASP) states that personal protective
equipment, specifically respirators, will be reevaluated following initial exposure
assessments with respect to respirable lead and arsenic.
Please describe the basis for this requirement and how the evaluation will be
performed.
Response: The basis for this reauirement is the OSHA Lead Standard. Title 29
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.62, and the OSHA Arsenic Standard, Title
29 CFR 1926.1118. The evaluation will be performed during RAM activities as
directed by those two OSHA standards, and will be evaluated throughout the
project based on both industrial hygiene air samples and real-time dust
monitoring. See Appendix H.
mccarter
&ENGLISH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
July 22, 2015
VIA E-MAIL AND U S. MAIL
Mr. David E. Leone
Senior Project Manager
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
249 Vanderbilt Avenue
Norwood, MA 02062
Re: Draft Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Plan Public Involvement Plan (PIP)
1 Horizon Way/Former Everett Staging Yard, Everett, MA
RTN 3-13341
Dear Mr. Leone:
On behalf of the Key Petitioner to the above-referenced PIP Petition (Evmorphia
Stratis), we hereby submit the following comments to the draft RAM Plan dated
June 2, 2015:
1. Wynn and GZA have elected to perform the remedial actions at the Site via
multiple MCP Preliminary Response Actions rather than via the MCPs
Comprehensive Response Action process. Specifically, Wynn and GZA plan to
implement multiple Release Abatement Measures (RAMs) rather than developing a
comprehensive Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) in accordance with
310 CMR 40.0870. As stated in the MCP (310 CMR 40.0405(3)), "the purposes of
Release Abatement Measures are to remediate limited or localized releases, and/or
to mitigate the impacts of larger releases until such time as more comprehensive
remedial actions can be instituted at the disposal site, in accordance with 310 CMR
40.0800."
Please explain why a RAM Plan rather than a Phase IV RIP is being used to
implement remedial actions at the Site and how Wynn and GZA see this approach
as consistent with 310 CMR 40.0405(3). Please address specifically why a
Preliminary Response Action approach has been selected when the Comprehensive
Response Action process (i.e., completion of Phase II and Phase III evaluations) is
already in progress for the Site, and the results of same are plainly being relied
upon by GZA. This seems to be a significant distinction between the use of RAMs
on other larger scale projects where comprehensive response actions have not yet
commenced or been as far along.
2. The most recent publicly documented Risk Characterization was conducted
as part of the Phase III Remedial Action Plan (GEI, 2013). However, Wynn and GZA
have collected additional soil and groundwater samples since that Risk
Characterization was completed.
ME1 20730705V. 1
July 22, 2015
Page 2
Please explain how data for the samples collected since the 2013 Risk
Characterization update and impact the findings and conclusions of the 2013 Risk
Characterization. Specifically, please describe how exposure point concentrations
and associated quantitative risk estimates are impacted by these additional data.
3. The Stage I and II Environmental Risk Characterization prepared by Menzie-
Cura & Associates, Inc. (MCA) (2006) stated that a condition of Substantial Hazard
existed due to "continuing discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface water
where the levels of oil or hazardous material attributable to the release already
exceed Massachusetts Surface Water Standards” (MCA, 2006). A condition of
Substantial Hazard has continued to exist almost 10 years after it was identified.
Please explain how Wynn plans to address this Substantial Hazard.
4. The Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment (GEJ, 2012) concluded from
MCA’s Stage II Ecological Risk Characterization (2006) that “[t]he sediments near
the Site pose a significant risk of harm to the benthic (i.e. sediment-dwelling)
invertebrate community at the Site. Concentrations of arsenic and copper in the soft-
shell clam from the Site exceeded the levels associated with toxicological effects to
benthic invertebrates. The results of the chronic sediment toxicity tests in four of the
five samples showed significantly reduced survival, growth, or reproduction relative
to "local conditions" samples,” (GEI, 2012). The Draft RAM Plan states that
"remediation planned on the land-side portion of the Site js likely to change
conditions on the water-side portion of the Site" (emphasis supplied).
Please explain how the remediation of the land-side portion of the Site is expected
to change conditions on the water-side portion of the Site. Additionally, please
describe specifically what effect the remedial actions are expected to have on
copper concentrations in surface water and sediment and the basis for these
expectations in light of the fact that the leachate testing performed for the in-situ
stabilization (ISS) mixture did not include copper.
5. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (GEI, 2013) indicates that a Temporary
Solution may be achieved for the water-side portion of the Site.
Please explain whether Wynn plans to achieve a Temporary Solution or a
Permanent Solution for the water-side portion of the Site.
6. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (GEI, 2013) included a post-
remediation risk characterization to evaluate potential risks following implementation
of the selected Remedial Action Alternative. This risk characterization identified
Significant Risks after remediation for the following receptors: future hypothetical
park visitor, future hypothetical resident, and future construction worker.
ME1 20730705V. 1
July 22, 2015
Page 3
Please describe possible remedial alternatives that could be implemented to
address these identified significant risks, and please provide a comparison of the
costs to eliminate these risks, without relying on an Activity and Use Limitation
(AUL) to do so, relative to the cost of the planned remedy which leaves significant
contamination (and associated risk) in place at the Site.
7. The Phase III Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (GEI, 2013) did not include an
evaluation of remedial alternatives that would achieve or approach background
conditions.
Please describe possible remedial alternatives that could be implemented to
achieve or approach background conditions at the Site, and please provide a
comparison of the costs to achieve background relative to the cost of the planned
remedy.
8. The Draft RAM Plan states that “the Phase III RAP identified three areas of
concern to be addressed to reach a Permanent Solution under the MCP on the
land-side portion of the Site” (GZA, 2015). The Phase III (RAP) also stipulates that
an achievement of a Permanent Solution is dependent on an AUL.
Please describe in detail what conditions will be included in the AUL (i.e., activities
and uses that will be prohibited in order to maintain a condition of No Significant
Risk and obligations and conditions that will be imposed by the AUL).
9. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states the following remedial objectives:
Location
Remedial Objective Description
Media
Primary
Constituents
of Concern
A-5 Area
• Reduce soil concentrations below
Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs)
• Remove soil with arsenic and lead
concentrations similar to sample A-5
• Reduce risk for future construction
workers
Soil
Arsenic
Lead
CES-2 Area
• Remove potential source material
• Reduce groundwater concentrations
to below UCLs
• Reduce risk for future construction
workers
Soil
Groundwater
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH Area
• Treat potential source material
• Reduce groundwater concentrations
to below UCLs
• Adjust pH to greater than
approximately 4
Soil
Groundwater
Arsenic
Lead
Low pH
ME1 20730705V 1
July 22, 2015
Page 4
Please explain how the proposed remedial actions will achieve the remedial
objectives of reducing soil and groundwater concentrations below UCLs, removing
potential source material, removing soil with arsenic and lead concentrations similar
to sample A-5, and reducing risk for future construction works.
Please explain how it will be demonstrated that the remedial objectives have been
achieved following completion of the remedial activities.
10. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that “based on the analytical data
developed as part of recent assessment activities, the A-5 Area has been expanded
southerly to include exploration locations GZ101, GZ102 and GZ103, and is
bounded by explorations A-5-2, A-5-3, A-5-4, A-5-5, A-5-6, GZ004, GZ006, GZ007,
GZ008, and GZ009” (GZA, 2015). As a point of clarification, should samples GZ004,
GZ006! GZ007, GZ008, and GZ009 be GZ104, GZ106, GZ107, GZ108, and
GZ109? It appears that several of the samples bounding the A-5 Area excavation
exceed UCLs for arsenic in soil, including A-5-3, GZ104, GZ106, and GZ109.
Please explain the basis for leaving in place these soils that exceed UCLs and how
achievement of the remedial objective of reducing soil concentrations to below
UCLs will be demonstrated.
These sample locations do not appear to be included in Figure 3 - Proposed Pre-
Construction RAM Remediation Areas. Please add these locations to the figure so
that reviewers and the public can confirm that the proposed areas shown are
bounded as described in the text.
11. Please explain how the boundaries of the proposed CES-2 Area excavation
were determined.
12. Please describe where concentrations above UCLs are expected to remain
following the proposed remedial actions and a list of the samples used to
characterize those areas.
13. Please explain the basis for sidewall and bottom sampling frequency in the
CES-2 and A-5 excavation areas.
14. One of the stated remedial objectives for the CES-2 Area is to reduce
groundwater concentrations to below UCLs; however, the Draft RAM Plan does not
include proposed monitoring of the groundwater following the excavation, which
would seem to be both prudent and necessary.
Please explain how it will be demonstrated that this remedial objective has been
achieved.
15. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) does not include excavation designs for
the A-5 Area and CES-2 Area.
ME1 20730705v. 1
July 22, 2015
Page 5
Please provide these designs for public comment.
16. Please describe how the boundaries of the Low pH Area were defined.
17. Please describe how dust will be suppressed during ex-situ soil mixing
activities.
18. Please quantify and describe the human health risks associated with ex-situ
mixing of soils containing lead concentrations that exceed the TCLP criterion.
19. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states, "in order to meet effluent limits, the
treatment train will likely include equalization, metals precipitation through
clarification, filtration and sludge management, cyanide destruction through a two
stage oxidation process, arsenic polishing by ion exchange or adsorbent resin, and
neutralization," (GZA, 2015).
Please provide the design of this treatment train for public comment.
20. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that hydraulic containment of
groundwater will be maintained and the contractor will prepare a recharge area
design.
Please provide the hydraulic containment design for public comment.
21. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),
"particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) are referred to as "fine"
particles and are believed to pose the greatest health risks,” (USEPA, 2015).
Please describe the basis for monitoring for PM 10 dust particles instead of or in
addition to PM2.5 and total suspended particulate.
22. Please describe the basis for the total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs)
action level of 1 parts per million (ppm) for the 15-minute time-weighted average,
and please explain how this action level will maintain a condition of No Significant
Risk in accordance with the MCP for nearby receptors during construction.
23. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that the PM10 dust action levels
were selected based on National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and
Massachusetts Ambient Air Quality Standards (MAAQS) and that GZA developed
soil-derived dust exposure point concentrations (EPCs) for each of the remediation
areas.
Please describe how these values were used to select the PM 10 action levels.
24. Please describe the required calibration methodology and frequency for the
air monitoring equipment and how calibration information will be documented.
ME1 20730705v. 1
July 22, 2015
Page 6
25. The Draft RAM Plan (GZA, 2015) states that “visual observations of both the
Mystic River and the Coastal Bank outside of the sheet pile wall will be conducted
on a daily basis during ISS implementation to assess for the breakout of remedial
additives,” (GZA, 2015).
Please describe specifically how these visual observations will be able to assess
breakout of remedial additives. Please describe why sampling and analysis of the
nearby surface water (which would seem to be both prudent and necessary) was
not included in the RAM Plan to assess breakout of remedial additives.
26. The Health and Safety Plan (HASP) states that personal protective
equipment, specifically respirators, will be reevaluated following initial exposure
assessments with respect to respirable lead and arsenic.
Please describe the basis for this requirement and how the evaluation will be
performed.
We look forward to receiving a summary of ail comments received and responses
thereto. Please let me know if you have any questions.
LAG:cl
cc: Laurence Feldman, LSP, GZA (by email)
Ms. Evmorphia Stratis (by email)
Douglas G. Larson, Ph.D., P.E., GeoSyntec Consultants (by email)
Julianna B. Connolly, LSP, GeoSyntec Consultants (by email)
Karen Stromberg, MA DEP (by email)
Andrew Clark, MA DEP (by email)
ME1 20730705V. 1
Commenters
Comment Code
Entity or Individual
Maharjan
Buddha Maharjan, 7 Scott Place, Everett, MA 02149
Levesque
Lynn C. Levesque, Charlestown, MA 02129
Somerville
City of Somerville, Massachusetts (Joseph Curtatone, Mayor)
Kelleher
Ann Kelleher, joy02129@gmail.com
M&E
McCarter & English, 265 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110-3113, Leigh A.
Gilligan, Partner
Comments Received on Draft Public Involvement Plan and/or Release Abatement Measure Plan as of
July 13, 2015
Maharjan-1
In meeting, you said the truck will not use the route 99, any city road, Sullivan
square, and Costco road. 1 am curious, what roads are they using because there
are no other roads than 1 mention above? Or are you making any skyway overfly
ramp for the truck? We want to know about it in details before you start the
work.
Response: During the June 2, 2015 meeting, it was stated that local roads (e.g.,
Main Street, Bunker Hill Street and Medford Street in Charlestown) would not be
used. The actual routes for trucks hauling soil will be dictated in part by the
eventual disposal location for the soil; however, Wynn will limit the truck drivers
to main roads, such as Route 99, as direct routes to Route 93.
Maharjan-2
We live just across the site. When they will dig the soil, how long do the bad
smell spread on the air? In meeting, you didn't mention any range of distance.
You just mentioned about the alarm. But we want to know the factual data that
the harm air can harm the people. Before the work, we want to know the factual
researched data that people are safe/unsafe in certain distance of the working
site.
Response: No significant odors are anticipated during the remediation described
in the RAM Plan. The perimeter air monitoring system discussed during the June
2, 2015, meeting, and described more fully in the RAM Plan, is designed to
provide an alert before unacceptable levels of dust are generated, thereby
allowing appropriate and timely dust mitigation measures. The dust action levels
for the site were derived using a combination of site-specific soil analytical data
and published National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Massachusetts
Ambient Air Quality Standards. Details concerning the derivation of the action
levels are further described and presented in the RAM Plan.
Maharjan-3
What hours will they work? We don't want any disturbance at night.
Response: Hours of operation for the pre-construction remediation described in
the RAM Plan are anticipated to be from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday.
Levesque-1
1 note that one of the concerns voiced during your interviews with the
petitioners was their ability to adequately understand the issues around Wynn's
remediation of the Mystic River site. "Interviewees expressed an interest in
having discussions about the remedial response action process expressed in
layman's terms." 1 second this concern and request that you address this
concern in the future. 1 attended the June 2 meeting and frankly did not find it
all that helpful toward a better understanding of the issues around the site. Your
plan also does not address that concern. Both the presentation and the plan
shroud many of the issues in very technical jargon. Future communications
should be in clear layman English to further everyone's full
understanding. Perhaps an "executive summary" highlighting key points, dates,
and contact information would be helpful?
Response: Future technical MCP submittals will contain an executive summary
or conclusions section.
Levesque-2
The PIP process opens up your planning process to the public for sharing
information and garnering input. Since so much of the traffic transporting the
contaminants out of the Mystic site will be going through Sullivan Square and
thus impact Charlestown/Boston residents - as duly noted by Chris Gordon at
the June 2 nd meeting, 1 would expect in the future that there would be much
more communication to the Charlestown community regarding the documents
available to them and dates of future meetings and comment periods. Notices in
the Charlestown Patriot Bridge at least a week before a meeting would also be
most appropriate.
Response: As discussed at several meetings, Wynn will hold future meetings in
various communities, including Charlestown, to keep the community informed
about the project and remediation, and to answer questions. As has been done
in the past, milestone public meetings will be publicly advertised to ensure
proper notice.
Levesque-3
As part of this openness, 1 would suggest that in the future you provide
information in advance (2-3 days at least) of a meeting so that attendees can
digest the material prior to attending and thus be more conversant with the
issues.
Response: GZ A and Wynn will attempt to provide information for future
meetings 3 days in advance.
Levesque-4
Also in the future, when deadlines have been extended, as they have in this case,
emails to those signing up at the meeting would appear to be most
appropriate. It is unclear to me why this extension was not widely
communicated.
Response: The decision to extend the public comment period was reached at
the request of the attorney representing the PIP Petitioners. The noted
deadlines were changed in the online repository, and notifications were made to
those people who had signed up for the mailing list. Those who had requested
correspondence via email received the notice electronically; those for whom we
only have mailing addresses, or who had requested correspondence via USPS,
received the information via the USPS.
Levesque-5
While 1 am not conversant with the technical aspects of the plan, 1 would like to
know if there has been any sort of independent analysis of the site, by qualified
experts not paid by Wynn, that confirms your plan for remediation. For example,
you note that there are only three "hot spots" that need to be cleaned up prior
to construction. Would an independent environmental engineering firm confirm
that conclusion?
Response: The remedial action alternatives outlined in the Phase III - Remedial
Action Plan were first developed by GEI Consultants, Inc. for the prior owner of
the Site. The selected alternatives were reviewed and supplemented by GZA.
Wynn and GZA met with representatives of the MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site
Cleanup to discuss the proposed landside remediation of the disposal site, and
the draft RAM Plan addresses initial comments offered by MassDEP. In addition,
the Gaming Commission has retained its own consultants to monitor activities at
the site. Finally, we understand that an independent Licensed Site Professional
has also been retained by the PIP petitioners to review GZA's work.
Somerville-1
Somerville officials, including the Mayor, the City Solicitor, and the Director of
Sustainability and Environment, all at City Hall, 93 Highland Avenue, Somerville,
MA 02143, should be added to the "site mailing list" and to the Notification to
Local Officials and Residents of Major Milestones and Events list in the Public
Involvement Plan.
Response: The noted entities have been added to the mailing/notification lists.
Somerville-2
The Somerville Public Library, 79 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143, should
be added as an additional Local Information Repository for all documents.
Response: The Somerville Public Library will be added.
Somerville-3
Information about any planned response actions which may impact any portion
of waters or land within Somerville's boundaries should be provided, and clearly
demarcated on plans, to Somerville and the public. All information regarding
proposed routing of contaminated soil or materials should be provided to
Somerville officials.
Response: No MCP response actions associated with the disposal site are
anticipated to occur within the boundaries of Somerville; however, should
response actions extend into Somerville, the requested information will be
provided. Routing of contaminated soil or materials through Somerville, with the
exception of potential transportation via a short section of Route 38 to Interstate
93, is not anticipated.
Somerville-4
Somerville believes it is appropriate and necessary for an independent licensed
site professional to review the remedial action plan (RAM Plan) and any further
remediation plans.
Response: See Levesque-5
Somerville-5
More than half of the land area containing over half the population of Somerville
meets one or more of the Environmental Justice (EJ) population descriptors in
the 2002 EJ Policy. Many of these block groups are within a mile of the Wynn
Everett site, as are similar EJ populations in Everett and other surrounding
communities. Whether or not required by the EJ Policy, enhanced public
participation, as set forth in that policy, should have been met in the circulation
and review of the Plan, the RAM Plan, and should be met for all steps going
forward. Without this enhanced public participation, the public involvement
plan falls short of the standard for true public involvement and will instead
disenfranchise many of the residents most affected by the proposed activities,
including the transport of contaminated soils.
The EJ Policy indicates that: Enhanced public participation may include use of
alternative media outlets such as community or ethnic newspapers, use of
alternative information repositories, and translation of materials or
interpretation services at public meetings where the relevant EJ Population uses
a primary language other than English in the home.
As many of these EJ populations are found along the 1-93 corridor and other
major access routes to Wynn Everett, such outreach should be required. The
Plan's distribution list should include alternative media outlets, placement in
alternative information repositories, and announcements or summaries in
Spanish, Greek, Haitian Creole, Italian, Portuguese, all of which are languages
used by Somerville's EJ communities, as well as to SomerViva,
http://somervillema.gov/somerviva, the City of Somerville's immigrant outreach
program.
Response: The PIP Plan was developed in accordance with applicable regulations
(310 CMR 40.0000) and guidance (MassDEP Interim Policy WSC-800-90). As
noted in the comment, the enhanced public participation components of the EJ
Policy are not applicable to remediation sites. Furthermore, a review of
published EJ maps indicates that the disposal site is not located within, or within
approximately Vi mile of, any community exhibiting English isolation. As such,
these enhanced public participation activities are not warranted for the planned
MCP response actions.
Somerville-6
What method will be utilized to conduct the in-situ solidification and stabilization
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
("ISS") in the Low pH area? ISS is proposed to be conducted to 15 feet below
grade. Does the soil mixing method/ISS result in the potential for the migration
of "remedial additives" beneath the sheet pile wall (20 ft. below grade) to the
Coastal Bank or into the Mystic River? If so, what monitoring will be conducted
to assess if this is the case?
Response: The specific method used to conduct ISS in the Low pH Area will be
dependent on the selected remediation contractor; however, bucket mixing is
anticipated. The sheet pile wall will extend to approximately 20 feet below
grade, while ISS will extend to approximately 15 feet below grade, allowing for
an approximately 5-foot buffer zone of soil, greatly limiting the potential for
migration of remedial additives beneath the sheet pile wall. Visual monitoring
will be conducted to assess the potential for migration of additives to the Coastal
Bank or into the Mystic River.
Somerville-7
The RAM indicates that "visual observations of both the Mystic River and the
Coastal Bank outside of the sheet pile wall will be conducted on a daily basis
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
during ISS implementation to assess for the breakout of remedial additives."
How often will visual observations be made during the day? What visual
observations will indicate breakout? In the event of visual evidence that is
assumed to consist of water or fluid breakout at the Coastal Bank, what field
monitoring and/or instruments will be utilized to assess pH, metals/oil and/or
hazardous materials ("OHM") in the fluids discharged to the Coastal Bank or
Mystic River? Is there a contingency plan to address breakout if it occurs?
Response: Visual observations will be conducted as often as practical, but at a
minimum at the start and end of each work day when ISS is being performed.
Visual observations indicating breakout include seeps of soil/Portland cement
mixes, sloughing of soils, or cloudy/discolored plumes emanating from the
shoreline. It is expected that field monitoring in the event of breakout will be
limited to visual observation; however, the use of a field pH meter and collection
of surface water samples for laboratory analysis will be conducted as necessary.
In the unlikely event of breakout, a silt curtain and/or other damming/isolation
procedure will be utilized to limit impacts to the resource areas and assess the
location from which such breakout is occurring. Procedures to isolate/block
migration from inside of the sheet pile wall would also be implemented.
Somerville-8
The upper 4 feet of soils located within the Low pH area will be excavated and
placed back into the Low pH Area upon completion of ISS. What is the pH and
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
concentration of metals/OHM in these soils (0 to 4 feet)? Will the placement of
these soils back into this area result in a continued infiltration of metals/OHM to
the subsurface soils or groundwater and/or the migration of metals/OHM
particulates in surface water runoff to the Mystic River?
Response: Concentrations of metals/OHM in these soils are generally lower than
those encountered in deeper soils. Much of the upper 4 feet of soil in the Low
pH area consists of tunnel muck from the Deer Island outfall project. The
average arsenic concentration in soil from the upper 4 feet of this area is 19
mg/kg, while the average lead concentration is 249 mg/kg; the measured pH of
these soils is above the remedial target of pH 4. Given these conditions, the on¬
site reuse of these soils should not result in significant impacts to groundwater
or surface water, nor is it expected to result in significant infiltration or migration
of contaminants.
Somerville-9
The source of the metals in area A-5 is attributed to fill. The source of the metals
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
in soil and groundwater at CES-2 and the Low pH area was not identified in the
reports reviewed by Lightship Engineering. What is the source of metals detected
in soil and groundwater in areas CES-2 and the Low pH area, is it the fill or
another source(s)?
Response: The source of metals in soil and groundwater at the CES-2 and Low
pH area is believed to be related to historic filling practices and/or releases from
historic operations.
Somerville-10
The GEI Phase III Remedial Action Plan dated August 27, 2013 ("GEI Phase III")
indicates groundwater mounding during high tide conditions (Figure 6), abutting
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
the Low pH Area. Why is there mounding of groundwater in this area and is the
mounding still evident during low tide? Will the hydrogeologic impact of the ISS,
when completed, combined with the mounding observed result in the migration
of metals/OHM to other areas on and/or off site as a result in the change to
hydrogeologic conditions. Will it exacerbate existing OHM conditions?
Response: The source of the mounding depicted on Figure 6 of the GEI Phase III
report is not readily apparent; however, groundwater elevation monitoring was
conducted during a concurrent geotechnical evaluation of the Site using
automated pressure transducers over a multi-day monitoring period. In general,
shallow groundwater appears to be locally perched above the organic layer. This
may account for the noted mounding. As the goal of the ISS program is to
increase groundwater pH to a level above 4, and a relationship between elevated
dissolved metal concentrations and groundwater with a pH below 4 has been
observed, the successful completion of the ISS program is not anticipated to
result in a significant migration of metals/OHM to another on- or off-site area.
Somerville-11
What is the hydrogeologic impact to surface water or groundwater with
changing tidal elevations (low and high)? Have surface water and groundwater
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
elevations and samples been collected during both low and high tide to assess
the change in hydraulic gradients or change in pH or concentration of
metals/OHM detected?
Response: Groundwater elevation monitoring was conducted during a
concurrent geotechnical evaluation of the Site using automated pressure
transducers over a multi-day monitoring period. In general, shallow
groundwater appears to be locally perched above the organic layer, and does not
appear to be significantly affected by the tides. Surface water samples and
groundwater seep samples were obtained at low tide, as those samples
represent groundwater that is discharging to the Mystic River, as well as "worst
case" surface water conditions within the groundwater-to-surface water mixing
zone. Further information will be presented in the forthcoming supplemental
Phase II - Comprehensive Site Assessment for the water-side portion of the Site.
Somerville-12
At what depth were the sediment samples collected and submitted for
laboratory analysis (0 to 1 ft., 1-3 ft.)? What is the spatial distribution and extent
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
of metals/OHM and pH if any in the seeps and surface water and sediment
(vertically and horizontally) adjacent to the landward portion of the site,
specifically areas CE-2 and Low pH area, as well as on the Coastal Bank or further
into the Mystic River?
Response: Additional surface water and sediment data will be presented in the
forthcoming supplemental Phase II - Comprehensive Site Assessment for the
water-side portion of the Site. The current RAM Plan does not include any
response actions involving surface water or sediment.
Somerville-13
Does the new data change the opinions or conclusions set forth in the GEI Phase
IH associated with surface water and sediment or other environmental media?
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
Does this change the scope or extent of the RAM or create a need to
concurrently conduct response actions on the Coastal Bank or sediment in the
Mystic River?
Response: Details concerning the surface water and sediment data will be
presented in the forthcoming supplemental Phase II - Comprehensive Site
Assessment for the water-side portion of the Site. The Pre-Construction RAM
Plan was developed as a risk-reduction measure to address contaminants on the
landward side of the top of Coastal Bank prior to initiation of construction.
Additional remedial activities related to the water-side of the top of Coastal Bank
will be addressed as part of the construction-related RAM Plan.
Somerville-14
Are the impacts to sediment and/or surface water a result of the impacts from
the landward portion of the site, local conditions or both? Does this change the
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
scope or extent of the RAM or need to concurrently conduct response actions on
the Coastal Bank or sediment in the Mystic River?
Response: See Somerville-13
Somerville-15
Acidic pH conditions were observed in groundwater that correspond to
concentrations of metals exceeding Upper Concentration Limits spatially located
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
directly adjacent to the Coastal Bank as well as surface water and sediment in
the Mystic River. Has an updated ecological Imminent Hazard ("IH") evaluation
been conducted (40.0955(3)(a) or (b)) or a Risk to Safety (40.0960(3)(c))
evaluation based upon the results of the new GZA data that also includes the
recent seep, surface water and sediment sampling and analysis that is yet to be
provided to the public? An IH is not likely but Lightship Engineering has not
reviewed data to determine if this is the case or any information indicating an IH
evaluation has been conducted based upon the result of the new GZA data.
Response: See Somerville-13
Somerville-16
There appears to be an ecological Substantial Hazard Condition (40.0956 (2)(d)
and/or (e)). Is the purpose of the RAM to abate the Substantial Hazard
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
Condition?
Response: See Somerville 13
Somerville-17
The GEI Phase III addressed many of the items noted above but considerable new
data has been generated by GZA. Does the new data change the GEI Phase III
via Lightship
Engineering, LLC
assumptions concerning the impact to surface water and sediment and
associated MCP risk related conditions and conclusions?
Response: See Somerville-13
Kelleher-1
In the Draft of the Public involvement plan, my concerns are related to the
contaminants of the site, are they considered hazardous?
Response: The contaminants being addressed by the RAM Plan are included on
the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material List in the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan.
Kelleher-2
How will they be transported from the site?
Response: Contaminated soil will be transported off-site via covered truck by
licensed haulers under appropriate documentation and in accordance with all
local, state and federal environmental regulations.
Kelleher-3
Will they be using roads in Charlestown?
Response: See Maharjan-1
Kelleher-4
Also, who will be monitoring this process? An independent agency?
Response: See Levesque-5. In addition, of course, MassDEP wil be monitoring
response actions at the site, and has the right to inspect the site as it feels
necessary.
M&E-l
DEP's proposed format appears to favor a cover page to be included with the PIP
Plan including PREPARED FOR and PREPARED BY information and contact
information for same.
Response: The PIP Plan has been revised to include a cover page with the noted
information.
M&E-2
When setting forth public comment period end or close dates on draft
documents being made available for public comment in the future, please
include the following language immediately after the public comment period end
or close date: UNLESS EXTENDED AT THE REQUEST OF THEPUBLIC FOR A
MINIMUM OF AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY (20) DAYS.
Response: The requested language will be included in future references to public
comment periods.
M&E-3
At Section 2.10, Site Description, please include the acreage of the so-called
water-side portion of the Site.
Response: The assessment of data to develop the extent of the water-side
portion of the disposal site is ongoing. Details concerning these findings will be
incorporated into the supplemental Phase II - Comprehensive Site Assessment
for the water-side portion of the Site.
M&E-4
At Section 4.23 and Exhibit II, confirm that Wynn and GZA will hold meetings for
all RAM plans and completion statements (currently says that it will do so for
RAMs associated with "pre-construction remediation" and "construction related
activities").
Response: Confirmed. The text at Section 4.23 and Exhibit II will be changed
accordingly.
M&E-5
Establish a Public Information Station at an accessible and visible area at the
perimeter of the Site and include real-time reporting of the perimeter air testing
results that will be undertaken at the site during remediation activities, as well as
emergency and non-emergency contact information.
Response: The project information area to be created at the perimeter of the site
will provide emergency contact information. The air quality monitoring (dust
monitoring) results will be summarized on the project web site. Any air quality
issues deemed as urgent should be reported to the project team by the
emergency contact numbers provided.
M&E-6
At Section 4.23, confirm that Wynn/GZA will provide a minimum of fourteen (14)
days advance notice prior to any public meeting.
Response: GZA and Wynn will attempt to provide notice of future public
meetings at least 14 days in advance.
M&E-7
When distributing draft documents for review in the PIP process, include upfront
summaries using layperson's language, understandable to the general public.
Response: See Levesque-1.
M&E-8
Circulate drafts of documents to be discussed at properly noticed PIP meetings at
least 2 to 3 days prior to said meetings to enable more efficient review and
discussion at meetings.
Response: See Levesque-3.
Buddha
David E. Leone
From:
To:
Subject: Re: Questions
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:24:59 PM
David,
Thank you for your kind cooperation.
I am Buddha Maharjan from 7 Scott place, Everett, MA02149
Thanks
With Best Regards
Buddha
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 12:10 PM, David E. Leone <davide.leone@gza.com> wrote:
>
> Buddha,
>
> Thank you for your questions. We will be compiling and responding to all questions/comments at the
end of the comment period. Could you please provide your full name and address for our records?
>
> Thanks,
> David Leone
>
> .Original Message-
> From: Buddha [ mailto:bostonbuddha08@Qmail.com ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:16 PM
> To: David E. Leone
> Subject: Questions
>
> Hi Davide,
> This is Buddha. I was in last meeting. I have some questions.
> Ql. In meeting, you said the truck will not use the route 99, any city road, Sullivan square, and
Costco road. I am curious, what roads are they using because there are no other roads than I mention
above? Or are you making any skyway overfly ramp for the truck? We want to know about it in details
before you start the work.
> Q2. We live just across the site. When they will dig the soil, how long do the bad smell spread on the
air? In meeting, you didn't mention any range of distance. You just mentioned about the alarm. But we
want to know the factual data that the harm air can harm the people . Before the work, we want to
know the factual researched data that people are safe/unsafe in certain distance of the working site.
> Q3. What hours will they work? We don't want any disturbance at night.
>
> I hope you will answer my questions.
> Thank you
>
> With Best Regards
> Buddha
> _
> This electronic message is intended to be viewed only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may
> contain privileged and/or confidential information intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).
If you are
> not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, printing, copying, distribution or use
of this
> information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and
> destroy this message and its attachments from your system.
> _
> For information about GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. and its services, please visit our website at
www.gza.com< http://www.Qza.com/ >.
From:
To:
Cc:
Lvnne Levesque
David E. Leone
"John Tocco" : Alexis.Tkachuk@ciWofboston.aov: "McHuah. James fMGCV': Sal.DiDomenico@masenate.aov:
Salvatore LaMattina : "Rvan. Dan - Rep. HOU"
Subject: Response to Draft PIP dated June 2, 2015
Date: Sunday, June 21, 2015 9:32:24 AM
Mr. David E. Leone
Senior Project Manager
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
249 Vanderbilt Avenue, Norwood, MA 02062
Thank you for this opportunity to comment on your draft Public Involvement Plan. I am not familiar
with the technical content of the plan so my comments are limited to the public involvement process
itself:
1. I note that one of the concerns voiced during your interviews with the petitioners was their
ability to adequately understand the issues around Wynn’s remediation of the Mystic River
site. “Interviewees expressed an interest in having discussions about the remedial response
action process expressed in layman’s terms.” I second this concern and request that you
address this concern in the future. I attended the June 2 meeting and frankly did not find it all
that helpful toward a better understanding of the issues around the site. Your plan also does
not address that concern. Both the presentation and the plan shroud many of the issues in
very technical jargon. Future communications should be in clear layman English to further
everyone’s full understanding. Perhaps an “executive summary” highlighting key points, dates,
and contact information would be helpful?
2. The PIP process opens up your planning process to the public for sharing information and
garnering input. Since so much of the traffic transporting the contaminants out of the Mystic
site will be going through Sullivan Square and thus impact Charlestown/Boston residents - as
duly noted by Chris Gordon at the June 2 nd meeting, I would expect in the future that there
would be much more communication to the Charlestown community regarding the documents
available to them and dates of future meetings and comment periods. Notices in the
Charlestown Patriot Bridge at least a week before a meeting would also be most appropriate.
As part of this openness, I would suggest that in the future you provide information in advance
(2-3 days at least) of a meeting so that attendees can digest the material prior to attending and
thus be more conversant with the issues.
Also in the future, when deadlines have been extended, as they have in this case, emails to
those signing up at the meeting would appear to be most appropriate. It is unclear to me why
this extension was not widely communicated.
3. While I am not conversant with the technical aspects of the plan, I would like to know if there
has been any sort of independent analysis of the site, by qualified experts not paid by Wynn,
that confirms your plan for remediation. For example, you note that there are only three “hot
spots” that need to be cleaned up prior to construction. Would an independent environmental
engineering firm confirm that conclusion?
I look forward to receiving a summary of the comments on this plan and your responses to my
concerns and those of others prior to Wynn’s taking the remedial response action submitted for
comment and prior to moving to the next MCP phase.
Sincerely,
Lynne C. Levesque
Charlestown, MA 02129
City of Somerville, Massachusetts
JOSEPH A. CURTATONE
Mayor
June 22,2015
David E. Leone
GZA GeoEnvironmental
249 Vanderbilt Avenue
Norwood. Massachusetts 02062
Re: Comments on Draft Public Involvement Plan and Draft Release Abatement Measure Plan Pre-
Construction Remediation Activities
(Former) Everett Staging Yard
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Release Tracking Number 3-13341
Dear Mr. Leone:
The City of Somerville has reviewed the above-referenced plans prepared on behalf of Wynn MA, LLC, and hereby
provides the following comments.
Provide Information to City of Somerville
As a municipality directly adjacent to the land and water areas which are the subject of the both plans, the disclosure
of information, and opportunity for public review and comment, must include the City of Somerville and its citizens.
Somerville officials, including the Mayor, the City Solicitor, and the Director of Sustainability and Environment, all
at City Hall, 93 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143, should be added to “site mailing list” and to the
Notification to Local Officials and Residents of Major Milestones and Events list in the Public Involvement Plan. In
addition, the Somerville Public Library, 79 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA 02143, should be added as an
additional Local Information Repository for all documents.
Information about any planned response actions which may impact any portion of waters or land within
Somerville’s boundaries should be provided, and clearly demarcated on plans, to Somerville and the public. All
information regarding proposed routing of contaminated soil or materials should be provided to Somerville officials.
Independent Review
Somerville believes it is appropriate and necessary for an independent licensed site professional to review the
remedial action plan (RAM Plan) and any further remediation plans. This should be done solely at Wynn MA,
LLC’s cost. In the meantime, however, Somerville took it upon itself to request such a review by Lightship
Engineering, LLC. Lightship’s several comments and questions are set forth in the attached memorandum. These
comments and questions need to be addressed in detail by GZA before any remediation work is undertaken.
City Hall • 93 Highland avenue • Somerville. Massachusetts 02143
(617) 625-6600. EXT. 2100 • TTY: (866) 808-4851 • FAX: (617) 625 3434 • www.somervillema.gov
E-mail: mayor@somervillema.gov
One Call to City Hall
SllElI]
Citv of Somerville
Page 2
Environmental Justice
More than half of the land area containing over half the population of Somerville meets one or more of the
Environmental Justice (EJ) population descriptors in the 2002 EJ Policy. Many of these block groups are within a
mile of the Wynn Everett site, as are similar EJ populations in Everett and other surrounding communities. Whether
or not required by the EJ Policy, enhanced public participation, as set forth in that policy, should have been met in
the circulation and review of the Plan, the RAM Plan, and should be met for all steps going forward. Without this
enhanced public participation, the public involvement plan falls short of the standard for true public involvement
and will instead disenfranchise many of the residents most affected by the proposed activities, including the
transport of contaminated soils.
The EJ Policy indicates that:
Enhanced public participation may include use of alternative media outlets such
as community or ethnic newspapers, use of alternative information repositories,
and translation of materials or interpretation services at public meetings where
the relevant EJ Population uses a primary language other than English in the
home.
As many of these EJ populations are found along the 1-93 corridor and other major access routes to Wynn Everett,
such outreach should be required. The Plan’s distribution list should include alternative media outlets, placement in
alternative information repositories, and announcements or summaries in Spanish, Greek, Haitian Creole, Italian,
Portuguese, all of which are languages used by Somerville’s EJ communities, as well as to SomerViva,
http: www.somervillema.gov somerviva , the City of Somerville’s immigrant outreach program.
Enc.
cc: DEP Northeast Regional Office, 205B Lowell Street, Wilmington, MA 01887
Michael Galvin, OSPCD
Oliver Sellers-Garcia, Dir. of Sustainability and Environment
LIGHTSHIP
ENGINEERING
ASS I SSMf \ I \\|) Kl All DIAIinV • CIVII I NGIM I RISC, • I M ROY MAN AG I Ml M
« W ATI R AND WAS H VVA I I R MANAGEMENT • PI R.M1TTING
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FRO>l: Michael J. Pierdinock, LSP, Principal Lightship Engineering, LLC
SUBJECT: Comments to DRAFT Public Involvement Plan (‘ ,4 PIP , ‘ ! ) and Release
Abatement .Measure Plan, Pre Construction Remediation Activities , (“RAM”)
Former Everett Staging Yard, 1 Horizon Way, Everett, Massachusetts, R1N
3-13341 dated June 2, 2015 prepared by GZA Geo Environmental, Inc.
(“GZA”)
DATE: June 19, 2015
On behalf of the City of Somerville, Lightship Engineering, LLC (“Lightship Engineering")
reviewed the PIP and RAM associated with the above referenced site. Lightship Engineering's
questions or comments are set forth below.
Low JEii Area
• What method will be utilized to conduct the in-situ solidification and stabilization (“ISS")
in the Low pH area? ISS is proposed to be conducted to 15 feet below grade. Does the
soil mixing method/ISS result in the potential for the migration of “remedial additives"
beneath the sheet pile wall (20 ft. below grade) to the Coastal Bank or into the Mystic
River? If so, what monitoring will be conducted to assess if this is the case?
• The RAM indicates that “visual observations of both the Mystic River and the Coastal
Bank outside of the sheet pile wall will be conducted on a daily basis during ISS
implementation to assess for the breakout of remedial additives." How often will visual
observations be made during the day? What visual observations will indicate breakout?
In the event of visual evidence that is assumed to consist of water or fluid breakout at the
Coastal Bank, what field monitoring and/or instruments will be utilized to assess pH,
metals/oil and/or hazardous materials (“OHM") in the fluids discharged to the Coastal
Bank or Mystic River? Is there a contingency plan to address breakout if it occurs?
• The upper 4 feet of soils located within the Low pH area will be excavated and placed
back into the Low pH Area upon completion of ISS. What is the pH and concentration of
metals/OHM in these soils (0 to 4 feet)? Will the placement of these soils back into this
area result in a continued infiltration of metals/OHM to the subsurface soils or
groundwater and or the migration of metals/OHM particulates in surface water runoff to
the Mystic River?
• The source of the metals in area A-5 is attributed to fill. The source of the metals in soil
and groundwater at CE-2 and the Low pH area was not identified in the reports reviewed
30 Industrial Park Road • Unit C • Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 • (508) 830-3344 • (508) 830-3360
www. LightshipEngineenng com
LIGHTSHIP
ENGINEERING
ASS1 SSMt \ I AND R| Ml DIATION • fIVII I NiilNI I RIN’C. • I Nl RGY MANAG! Ml N I . WATf R AND WASTIU A I i R MAN AGkMFNT • PI KM 11 IINO
Memorandum
June 19, 2015
Page 2 of3
by Lightship Engineering. What is the source of metals detected in soil and groundwater
in areas CE-2 and the Low pH area, is it the fill or another source(s)?
• The GEI Phase III Remedial Action Plan dated August 27, 2013 (“GEI Phase III )
indicates groundwater mounding during high tide conditions (Figure 6), abutting the Low
pH Area. Why is there mounding of groundwater in this area and is the mounding still
evident during low tide? Will the hydrogeologic impact of the ISS, when completed,
combined with the mounding observed result in the migration of mctals/OHM to other
areas on and/or offsite as a result in the change to hydrogeologic conditions. Will it
exacerbate existing OHM conditions?
• What is the hydrogcologic impact to surface water or groundwater with changing tidal
elevations (low and high)? Have surface water and groundwater elevations and samples
been collected during both low and high tide to assess the change in hydraulic gradients
or change in pH or concentration of metals/OHM detected?
Surface Water and Sediment
The PIP provided a conceptual overview of the sediment and surface water sampling conducted
recently by GZA but the results were not included in the PIP. The PIP indicated that 1 to 2 teet
of sediment removal will likely be conducted, the extent of which is yet to be determined and
will be included in future submittals. The following questions are posed associated with the new
surface water and sediment data that has not been provided to the public for review to date and
that could have an impact on the proposed RAM or future response actions:
e At what depth were the sediment samples collected and submitted for laboratory analysis
(0 to 1 ft., 1-3 ft.)? What is the spatial distribution and extent of metals/OHM and pH if
any in the seeps and surface water and sediment (vertically and horizontally) adjacent to
the landw ard portion of the site, specifically areas CE-2 and Low pH area, as well as on
the Coastal Bank or further into the Mystic River?
• Does the new data change the opinions or conclusions set forth in the GEI Phase Ill
associated with surface water and sediment or other environmental media? Does this
change the scope or extent of the RAM or create a need to concurrently conduct response
actions on the Coastal Bank or sediment in the Mystic River?
• Are the impacts to sediment and/or surface water a result of the impacts from the
landward portion of the site, local conditions or both? Does this change the scope or
extent of the RAM or need to concurrently conduct response actions on the Coastal Bank
or sediment in the Mystic River?
39 Industrial Park Road • Unit C • Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 • (508) 830-3344 • (508) 830-3360
www. LightshipEngineering com
LIGHTSHIP
ENGINEERING I
\SM SSMI S I AM) Rl Ml niMION * C l\ II I V.IM ! Kl\(. . i Nl Kt. N MWAi.l MIN! •
Memorandum
June 19, 2015
Page 3 of 3
® Acidic pH conditions were observed in groundwater that correspond to concentrations of
metals exceeding Upper Concentration Limits spatially located directly adjacent to the
Coastal Bank as well as surface water and sediment in the Mystic River. Has an updated
ecological Imminent Hazard (‘ilf) evaluation been conducted (40.0955(3)(a) or (b)) or a
Risk to Safety (40.0960(3 )(c)) evaluation based upon the results of the new GZA data that
also includes the recent seep, surface water and sediment sampling and analysis that is yet
to be provided to the public? An IH is not likely but Lightship Engineering has not
reviewed data to detennine if this is the case or any information indicating an IH
evaluation has been conducted based upon the result of the new GZA data.
• There appears to be an ecological Substantial Hazard Condition (40.0956 (2)(d) and/or
(e)). Is the purpose of the RAM to abate the Substantial Hazard Condition?
The GE1 Phase III addressed many of the items noted above but considerable new data has been
generated by GZA. Does the new data change the GEI Phase III assumptions concerning the
impact to surface water and sediment and associated MCP risk related conditions and
conclusions?
39 Industrial Park Road * Unit C • Plymouth. Massachusetts 02360 • (508) 830-3344 • (508) 830-3360
www. LightshipEngineering. com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
iovQ2129@amail.com
David E. Leone
iov02129@amail.com
Public comments
Sunday, July 12, 2015 4:21:04 PM
Mr. Leone, referring to section 2.20 environmental assessment history,
In the Draft of the Public involvement plan, my concerns are related to the contaminants of the site, are
they considered hazardous? how will they be transported from the site? Will they be using roads in
Charlestown? Also, who will be monitoring this process? An independent agency?
Please add my name to the mailing site, I appreciate the opportunity to submit questions,
thank you,
Ann Kelleher
617 721 3833
Sent from my iPad
MCCARTER
&ENGLISH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Leigh A. Gilligan
Partner
T 617-449-6520
F. 617-326-3116
!g illjgan@mccarter com
July 13, 2015
VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. David E. Leone
Senior Project Manager
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
249 Vanderbilt Avenue
Norwood, MA 02062
Re: Draft Public Involvement Plan (PIP)
(Former Everett Staging Yard)
1 Horizon Way
Everett, MA
RTN 3-13341
Comments to Draft PIP
McCarter & English, LLP
265 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110-3113
T. 617 449.6500
F. 617.607.9200
www.mccarter com
Dear Mr. Leone:
On behalf of the Key Petitioner to the above-referenced PIP Petition (Evmporphia
Stratis), we hereby submit the following comments to the draft PIP Plan dated
June 2, 2015:
• DEP’s proposed format appears to favor a cover page to be included with
the PIP Plan including PREPARED FOR and PREPARED BY information
and contact information for same.
BOSTON
• When setting forth public comment period end or close dates on draft
documents being made available for public comment in the future, please
HARTFORD
include the following language immediately after the public comment period
end or close date: UNLESS EXTENDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE
STAMFORD
PUBLIC FOR A MINIMUM OF AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY (20) DAYS.
NEW YORK
• At Section 2.10, Site Description, please include the acreage of the so-called
NEWARK
water-side portion of the Site.
EAST BRUNSWICK
• At Section 4.23 and Exhibit II, confirm that Wynn and GZA will hold meetings
for all RAM plans and completion statements (currently says that it will do so
PHILADELPHIA
for RAMs associated with “pre-construction remediation” and “construction-
related activities”).
WILMINGTON
WASHINGTON. DC
• At Section 4.23, confirm that Wynn/GZA will provide a minimum of fourteen
(14) days advance notice prior to any public meeting.
ME1 20714600V.1
July 13, 2015
Page 2
• Establish a Public Information Station at an accessible and visible area at
the perimeter of the Site and include real-time reporting of the perimeter air
testing results that will be undertaken at the site during remediation activities,
as well as emergency and non-emergency contact information.
• When distributing draft documents for review in the PIP process, include up¬
front summaries using layperson’s language, understandable to the general
public.
• Circulate drafts of documents to be discussed at properly noticed PIP
meetings at least 2 to 3 days prior to said meetings to enable more efficient
review and discussion at meetings.
We look forward to receiving a summary of comments received and responses
thereto. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
LAG/tao
cc: Lawrence Feldman, GZA
Ms. Evmorphia Stratis
ME1 20714600V.1
APPENDIX D
MASSGIS MAP
MassDEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Site Information: Ph3S6 1 Sit© Assessment M3p. 500 f66t
FORMER EVERETT STAGING YARD
1 HORIZON WAY EVERETT, MA
3-000013341
NAD 83 UTM Meters:
4695723mN , 329609mE (Zone: 19)
January 20, 2015
The information shown is the best available at the
date of printing However, it may be incomplete. The
responsible party and LSP are ultimately responsible
for ascertaining the true conditions surrounding the
site. Metadata for data layers shown on this map can
be found at:
http://www.mass.gov/mqis/ .
& 0.5 Mile Radii
MassDEP
Common*®^ a Mawoctvjwas
Department of Environmental Protection
wso**"**'
I emery
SAEWAU CIRCLE CONNECTOR
COOPfR STREET
NUE
EARHART
]AM T .
Oompute^ed
AMEL
STREET
NORMA*
SullUWrf
ERSONVILLE
street
y n/
Z/xZ
Next Wave Jdmor
e High ScV>’
MOUNT/
ENEDICT
mystic
KIM n
500 m
iooo ftr |
IVTLLE
Roads: Limited Access, Divided, Other Hwy, Major Road, Minor Road, Track, Trail PWS Protection Areas: Zone II, IWPA, Zone A.
~ 1 1 1 .. Hydrography Open Water, PWS Reservoir, Tidal Flat..
Boundaries Town, County, DEP Reqion; Train; Powertine, Pipeline; Aqueduct
-Wetlands: Freshwater, Saltwater, Cranberry Bog
Fig r~ )
Basins Major,PWS; Streams: Perennial, Intermittent, Man Made Shore, Dam FEMA lOOyr Floodplain, Protected Open Space; ACEC ....
Aquifers Medium Yield, High Yield, EPA Sole Source..1
Non Potential Drinking Water Source Area Medium, High (Yield)...
Est Rare Wetland Wildlife Hab, Vernal Pool . Cert., Potential
Solid Waste Landfill; PWS Com GW,SW.Emerg,Non-Com
APPENDIX E
BORING LOGS
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT_EVERETT_MA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GI\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-101
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 - 10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type: Macrocore Barrel
I.D./O.D. (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
TS”
05
Field
£ Stratum
E
Test
§-« Description
<D
a:
Data
o
Depth
(ft)
Blows/
Core
-Bate
No.
Depth
(ft-)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
> ^
0 )
LU ^
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
48
4-8
48
48
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Moist to wet, black/gray, GRAVEL, little medium to
coarse Sand, trace Brick, slight organic odor.
S-2: Damp, black, fine SAND, some medium to coarse
Sand, trace Silt, trace Gravel, Wood, Brick.
S-3: Damp, gray/brown, SILT and fine to medium SAND,
little coarse Sand, trace Gravel, Wood, Glass, Asphalt.
S-4: Damp, gray/brown, SILT and fine to medium SAND,
little coarse Sand, trace Gravel, Seashells.
S-5: Moist to damp, red/brown, fine to medium SAND,
some (+) Silt, trace Gravel, Wood.
S-6: Grayish/brown, WOOD, trace fine Sand.
S-7: Top 6": Gray/brown, WOOD, trace fine Sand.
Bottom 6": Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace fine Sand,
organic odor.
S-8: Top 8”: Gray/brown, WOOD, trace fine Sand.
Bottom 4”: Moist, light to dark gray, fine SAND, little Silt,
trace medium Sand, Roots.
S-9: Moist, gray, fine SAND, little Silt, trace Roots.
S-10: Top 6": Moist, brown/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
medium Sand, slight organic odor.
Bottom 6": Moist, gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt,
slight organic odor.
S-11: Moist, very stiff, slightly brown/gray, Silty CLAY,
trace fine Sand.
S-12: Moist, very stiff, slightly brown/gray, Silty CLAY,
trace fine Sand.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
6.5'
7.5'
PEAT
SAND
9’
l
12'
SILTY CLAY
20
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
1 Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.___
Boring No.
GZ-101
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
OZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-102
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 - 10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
Date
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
rz-
k_
03
E
<u
OH
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
Field
Test
Data
£ ^ Stratum
Description
Q
> ^
_g ^
LU ^
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
30
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Damp, brown, fine SAND, little medium to coarse
Sand, little Gravel.
S-2: Damp, brown, fine SAND, little medium to coarse
Sand, little Gravel, trace Silt, Brick.
S-3: Moist, brown, fine SAND, little medium to coarse
Sand, little Gravel, trace Silt, trace Brick, Roots, Wood.
S-4: Moist, brown, fine SAND, little (+) medium to coarse
Sand, trace (+) Silt, Gravel, Roots, Wood.
S-5: Moist, brown to gray to black, fine SAND, little
medium to coarse Sand, trace Brick, Gravel.
S-6: Moist, brown to gray to black, fine SAND, little
medium to coarse Sand, trace Brick, Gravel.
S-7: Damp, brownish/black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-8: Damp, brownish/black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor,
small bluish sheen on groundwater.
S-9: Top 6": Damp, brown/black, Fibrous PEAT, organic
odor, small bluish sheen on groundwater.
Bottom 6": Moist, gray, fine to medium SAND, organic
odor.
S-10: Damp, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine Sand,
odor.
S-11: Damp, very stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine
Sand, odor.
S-12: Moist, stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine Sand,
odor.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
6'
8.5'
m-
PEAT
SAND'
SILTY CLAY
12 '
20
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
3. Fabric material and wood observed at top of Peat layer.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-102
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT_EVERETT_MA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
ozv GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-103
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014
10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
S-1: Damp, brown/black, SILT, little fine Sand, trace
medium to coarse Sand, trace Gravel, Wood, faint organic
and petroleum odor.
S-2: Damp, brown/black, SILT, little fine to coarse Sand,
trace Gravel, Wood, faint organic and petroleum odor.
S-3: Damp, brown/black, SILT, little fine Sand, trace
Gravel, Wood, faint organic and petroleum odor.
S-4: Damp, brown/black, SILT, little fine to coarse Sand,
trace Gravel, Wood, faint organic and petroleum odor.
S-5: Brown/black SILT, little fine to coarse Sand, trace
Gravel.
S-6: Top 4": Brown/black SILT, little fine to coarse Sand,
trace Gravel.
Bottom 8": Moist, brown/black, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand, faint organic odor.
S-7: Moist, brown/black, Silty CLAY, trace fine to coarse
Sand, faint organic odor.
S-8: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace fine Sand, organic
odor.
S-9: Black/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to medium Sand,
organic odor.
S-10: Top 4": Blackish gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
medium Sand, organic odor.
Bottom 8”: Very stiff, Silty CLAY, trace fine to medium
Sand.
S-11: Very stiff, Silty CLAY, trace fine to medium Sand.
S-12: Very stiff, brown, Silty CLAY, trace fine to medium
Sand.
JZ
k—
CD
Field
E
Test
03
Cd
Data
£ „ Stratum
g-d Description
Q
> -—■
03
UJ "
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
48
5-8
48
48
9-12
48
48
15
20
25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
PEAT
SILTY CLAY
12 '
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
30
2 .
Fiolri tpstina results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
' i ™ v ou for nxnlanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
... t , transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
See |_
types. Actual transitions may be gradual,
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made
Boring No.
GZ-103
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
"x GZA
GZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-104
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 -10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Date
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
CO
E
<u
a:
Field
Test
Data
£ „ Stratum
S'*; Description
a
> ^
£
LU
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
48
4-8
48
43
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Dry, brown/red, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt.
S-2: Moist, multi-colored, fine SAND, little medium to
coarse Sand, little Silt, trace Gravel, Roots, Asphalt, Brick.
S-3: Top 4": Damp, dark red, SILT and fine to coarse
SAND, trace Gravel.
Bottom 8”: Medium gray/tan, Clayey SILT, little Roots,
trace fine to coarse Sand.
S-4: Top 11": Moist, red/black, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Silt, Gravel, Roots.
Bottom 32”: Light tan, Clayey SILT.
S-5: Light tan, Clayey SILT.
S-6: Top 4”: Moist, black, WOOD.
Middle 4": Moist, light tan, Clayey SILT.
Bottom 4": Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-7: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-8: Top 4": Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
Bottom 4": Wet, gray/brown, fine to coarse SAND.
S-9: Moist, green/brown, Silty CLAY, trace fine to coarse
Sand.
S-10: Moist, green/brown, Silty CLAY, trace fine to coarse
Sand.
S-11: Moist, green/brown, Silty CLAY, trace fine to coarse
Sand.
S-12: Moist, greenish brown/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
7’
PEAT
9’
U.JT SAND -
SILTY CLAY
12 '
20
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-104
WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT: 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
X GZA
OTA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-105
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 -10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type: Macrocore Barrel
I.D./O.D. (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Depth
(ft.)
en.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
S-1: Damp, light to dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Roots, Gravel, Silt, Asphalt.
S-2: Damp, red/brown to dark brow, fine to coarse SAND,
trace Asphalt, Gravel, Brick.
S-3: Damp, black/tan fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Asphalt.
S-4: Top 4": Damp, black/ brown, fine to coarse SAND,
trace Gravel.
Bottom 32”: Whitish to reddish to greenish, fine Clayey
SILT, trace fine to coarse Sand, Gravel.
S-5: Moist, multi-colored, fine to coarse SAND, some Silt,
trace Gravel, Roots, Wood.
S-6: Moist, gray/black, fine SAND, little medium to coarse
Sand, trace Silt, Gravel.
S-7: Moist to wet, blue/black/green, fine to coarse SAND
and SILT, trace Gravel.
S-8: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium to coarse
Sand.
S-9: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium to coarse
Sand.
S-10: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium to coarse
Sand.
S-11: Top 6”: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium
to coarse Sand.
Middle 3”: Wet, gray, fine to medium SAND, little coarse
Sand, trace Silt.
Bottom 3": Moist, hard, gray/green, Clayey SILT, trace fine
to coarse Sand.
S-12: Moist, hard, gray/green, Clayey SILT, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
Test
Data
Description
0)
LU —'
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
48
4-8
48
39
8-12
48
48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
8 '
10 '
prdB''
PEAT
“ SAND~“
CLAYEY SILT
15
20
12 '
25
30
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
1 Field test no results represent tot al organic vapor levels, referenced lo a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil samplejars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped vrith a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-106
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 11/3/2014 - 11/3/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Date-
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft-)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
CD
E
0 )
o:
Field
Test
Data
£ „ Stratum > „
§•« Description ^ c
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
36
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Damp, brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Roots, Brick, Silt.
S-2: Damp, brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Roots, Brick, Silt.
S-3: Damp, dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel, Brick, Glass, Wood, Silt.
S-4: Damp to moist, black/brown, fine to coarse SAND,
little Silt, trace Gravel, slight petroleum-like odor.
S-5: Moist, black/brownish, fine SAND, some Silt, trace
medium to coarse Sand, trace Gravel, petroleum-like
odor.
S-6: Moist, black/brown, fine SAND, some Silt, trace
medium to coarse Sand, trace Gravel, faint petroleum-like
odor.
S-7: Damp, black/brown, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-8: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium to coarse
Sand.
S-9: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, trace medium to coarse
Sand.
S-10: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
medium Sand.
S-11: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
medium Sand.
S-12: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
medium Sand.
ND
ND
4.7
20.2
1.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
6 '
PEAT
9'
SILTY CLAY
12 '
20
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-106
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ: STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
"\ GZA
GZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-107
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 -10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type: Macrocore Barrel
I.D./O.D. (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
en.
(in)
Rec
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
S-1: Moist, dark to light brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel, Silt.
S-2: Moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND, little Wood, trace
Brick, Gravel.
S-3: Moist, red/black, fine to coarse SAND, little Wood,
trace Brick, Gravel.
S-4: Damp to moist, red/brown, fine to coarse SAND,
some Silt, trace Brick, Gravel.
S-5: Wet, gray/black, fine to coarse SAND, little Silt,
possible Coal, trace Gravel.
S-6: Top 8": Wet, black, fine to coarse SAND, little (-) Silt,
trace Gravel.
S-7: Top 6”: Wet, light tan, SILT, trace Fibrous Peat, fabric
matter, organic odor.
Bottom 6" Moist, black/brown, Fibrous PEAT.
S-8: Moist, black to brown, Fibrous PEAT.
S-9: Top 3": Moist, black/brown, Fibrous PEAT.
Bottom 9": Wet, gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt.
S-10: Top 6": Wet, green/gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel, Silt.
Bottom 6": Moist, green/gray, Clayey SILT, trace (-) fine to
coarse Sand.
S-11: Moist, green/gray, Clayey SILT, trace (-) fine to
coarse Sand.
S-12: Moist, greenish/grayish/brown, Clayey SILT, trace (-)
fine to coarse Sand.
Test
Data
Stratum
g-d Description
O ""
>
.2? d
hi
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
48
4-8
48
48
8-12
48
48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
7.5'
9.5'
rr<r'
PEAT
SAND~
CLAYEY SILT
12 '
15
20
25
30
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
1 Field test no results represent tota l organ,c vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace ol sealed soil samplers usmg a ThermoEnvronmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped vrtha photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
3. Fine sand appears spherical (i.e. possibly unknown waste by-product)
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
N GZA
QZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-108
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 10/31/2014 -10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
Date,
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft-)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
ca
E
<D
or
Field
Test
Data
■B ^ Stratum > _
§■£, Description .2? c
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
24
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Brick, Roots.
S-2: Damp, light brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel, Asphalt, Brick.
S-3: Top 6": Moist, dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, little
Brick, trace Asphalt.
Bottom 6": Dry, white/gray, GRAVEL, little fine to coarse
Sand.
S-4: Red/brown, Clayey SILT, little fine to coarse SAND,
trace Brick, trace Glass, Wood.
S-5: Wet, dark brown/dark red, fine SAND,little Slit, trace
Gravel, odor.
S-6: Red/black, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt, Gravel,
odor.
S-7: Top 3": Wet, light tan, Clayey SILT, some Gravel,
trace fine to coarse Sand, odor.
Bottom 3” Black, fine to coarse SAND, little Wood, trace
Silt, Gravel.
S-8: Damp, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-9: Damp, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor. Wet, small
blue sheen globules on groundwater.
S-10: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-11: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-12: Top 3": Moist, gray, fine Sand, little Silt.
Bottom 9": Moist, stiff, Clayey SILT.
ND
ND
ND
11.1
7.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
7'
PEAT
11 '
TITS' SAND
12' CLAYEY SILT
20
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made
Boring No.
GZ-108
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT_EVERETT_MA GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-109
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 11/3/2014 -11/3/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type: Macrocore Barrel
I.D./O.D. (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
Test
Data
Stratum
g-cc Description
a
> •—■
0 )
LU “
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
36
8-12
48
48
15
20
25
30
S-1: Damp, brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Brick, Roots, Silt.
S-2: Damp, dark brown/gray, fine SAND, little Gravel,
trace Silt, Brick.
S-3: Moist, dark brown/red, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Brick, Silt.
S-4: Damp, red/green, Clayey SILT, trace medium to
coarse SAND, trace Gravel.
S-5: Damp, red to green, Clayey SILT, trace fine to coarse
SAND, trace Gravel.
S-6: Top 6": Damp, red/green, Clayey SILT, trace to
coarse SAND, Gravel.
Bottom 6": Damp, black/brown, fine SAND, trace Silt.
S-7: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-8: Moist, black, Fibrous PEAT, odor.
S-9: Damp, stiff, green/grayish, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
S-10: Damp, stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
S-11: Damp, stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
S-12: Damp, stiff, greenish/grayish/brown, Silty CLAY,
trace fine to coarse Sand.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
4'
CLAYEY SILT
6 '
PEAT
8 '
SILTY CLAY
12 '
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
1 Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
S<
tyi
OC
Loq Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
^es Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
n , r hup tn other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.:
GZ-109
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
N GZA
GZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-110
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start • Finish: 10/31/2014 -10/31/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Date
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft-)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
ro
E
CD
a.:
Field
Test
Data
£ _ Stratum > „
§-£, Description .22 d
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
48
8-12
48
40
15
20
S-1: Damp, brown/gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel, Silt, Brick, Roots, Asphalt.
S-2: Damp, dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, some Silt,
trace Gravel, trace Brick, Asphalt, Roots.
S-3: Top 3”: Damp, brown, WOOD.
Middle 6": Dry, gray/pink, Angular GRAVEL.
Bottom 3”: Damp, red to black, WOOD and BRICK, little
fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt.
S-4: Damp, black/green, Clayey SILT, trace medium to
coarse SAND, Brick.
S-5: Damp, light gray/red, SILT, little fine to coarse Sand,
trace Brick, Roots, Gravel.
S-6: Wet, red/black, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Brick.
S-7: Top 5": Wet, red/black, fine to coarse SAND,trace
Gravel, Brick.
Bottom 7": Moist, gray/red, Clayey SILT, little fine to
coarse Sand, trace Brick.
S-8: Top 6": Moist, gray/red, Clayey SILT, little fine to
coarse Sand, trace Brick.
Bottom 6": Damp to moist, Fibrous PEAT.
S-9: Moist, gray/dark red, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt,
Gravel, Roots.
S-10: Moist, gray/dark red, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt,
Gravel, Roots.
S-11: Moist, stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
S-12: Moist, stiff, green/gray, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
7.5'
peat
SAND
10 '
SILTY CLAY
12 '
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
25
30
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (RID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-110
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
N GZA
GI\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-111
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 11/3/2014 - 11/3/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type: Macrocore Barrel
I.D./O.D. (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
Rec
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
k_
03
Field
C
E
Test
Q.
<D
Q)
cn
Data
o
Stratum
> •—-
a>
uj
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
36
8-12
48
48
15
20
25
30
S-1: Dry, brown, fine to coarse SAND, little Gravel, trace
Silt.
S-2: Dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, Brick.
S-3: Damp, dark brown/black, SILT, little fine to coarse
Sand, trace Gravel.
S-4: Damp, dark brown/black, SILT, little fine to coarse
Sand, trace Gravel.
S-5: Damp, dark brown/black, SILT, little fine to coarse
Sand, trace Gravel.
S-6: Damp, brown/black, fine to coarse SAND, trace
Gravel.
S-7: Damp, tan/black, Clayey Silt.
Middle 3": Moist, black, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt.
S-8: Top 6": Moist, black, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt.
Bottom 6": Damp, brown/black, Fibrous PEAT.
S-9: Damp, brown/black, Fibrous PEAT.
S-10: Moist, grayish, fine to coarse SAND.
S-11: Moist, green/brown, Silty CLAY, trace fine to coarse
Sand, Gravel.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
SILT
PEAT
9’_
10 ’
SAND
SILTY CLAY
12 '
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
1 Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.__
Boring No.
GZ-111
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA GPJ; STRATUM ONLY WYNN EVERETT: 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
^ GZA
OZ\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-112
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY:
Drilling Co.: New Hampshire Boring
Foreman: Carl Downing/Donnie Dunklee
Logged By: Matt Dion/James Brown
Type of Rig: Geoprobe
Rig Model:
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Boring Location: A-5 Area
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 12
Date Start - Finish: 11/3/2014 - 11/3/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D/O.D.(in):
Hammer Weight (lb.):
Hammer Fall (in.):
Other:
Sampler Type:
I.D./O.D. (in.):
Sampler Hmr Wt (lb):
Sampler Hmr Fall (in):
Other:
Macrocore Barrel
1-3/872"
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
Dale
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Time
Water Depth
- 3 r
L_
CD
E
Q)
a:
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description and Identification
(Modified Burmister Procedure)
Field
Test
Data
£ ^ Stratum
§-£. Description
o
> ^
O ctd
LU ^
10
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
0-4
48
36
4-8
48
30
8-12
48
48
15
S-1: Damp, brown/gray, fine to coarse SAND, some
Gravel.
S-2: Moist, gray/brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt, Brick.
S-3: Damp, tan/black, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt, Brick, Asphalt.
S-4: Damp, brown/red, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt, Wood.
S-5: Damp, brown/red, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel,
Silt, Wood, petroleum-like odor.
S-6: Damp, brown/reddish/blackish, fine to coarse SAND,
trace Gravel, Silt, Wood, petroleum-like odor.
S-7: Damp, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-8: Damp, black, Fibrous PEAT, organic odor.
S-9: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand, Gravel.
S-10: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand, Gravel.
S-11: Damp, stiff, gray/green, Silty CLAY, trace fine to
coarse Sand, Gravel.
S-12: Damp, stiff, gray/greenish/reddish, Silty CLAY, trace
fine to coarse Sand, trace Gravel.
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FILL
6'
PEAT
8 '
SILTY CLAY
12 '
Bottom of boring at 12 feet.
20
25
30
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic vapor meter
equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Composite soil samples collected for arsenic and lead analysis.
See Log Key for explanation of sample description and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-112
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-201
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: James Roehrig
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 14
Date Start - Finish: 11/6/2014 -11/6/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
Field
Test
Data
Stratum
g Description
Q) tz
Equipment Installed
- 3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
S-1
5-7
24
11
7 7
7 3
14
10
S-2
10-12
24
15
20
25
30
S-1; Dry, medium dense, fine SAND,
some Silt, little Gravel, red staining
throughout sample.
ND
FILL
10 '
14.5
2 1
1 1
S-2: Moist, soft, Organic Clayey SILT,
some Shell fragments, red staining in
top 4-inches of sample.
ND
ORGANIC CLAYEY SILT
14'
Bottom of boring at 14 feet.
Concrete 0-1'
Soil Cuttings
1 - 2 '
Bentonite 2-3'
-2" PVC Riser
+2.5 - 4'
-Sand 3-14'
-2" PVC Screen
4-14'
Field testina results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic
vapor meter equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
Auger refusal at 14 feet bgs.
See loo kev for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
h-r^Ar-hial transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
types Actual transitions may be gradual,
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-201
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT_EVERETT MA GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-203
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: James Roehrig
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/6/2014 -11/6/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
h i
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
10
15
20
Blows/
Core
Rate,
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
en.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
i’per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
NO SAMPLES TAKEN
SOIL CLASSIFIED FROM AUGER
CUTTINGS
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
Test
Data
Stratum
g-g Description
o
FILL
ORGANIC SILT
15 '
3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-T
Soil Cuttings
1-3'
Bentonite 3-4'
-2" PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5'
-Sand 4-15'
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
25
30 1
i.
cn
x
O'
<
Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic
vapor meter equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
LLI
O'
See log key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made. __
Boring No.:
GZ-203
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-205
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: James Roehrig
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 17
Date Start - Finish: 11/6/2014 -11/6/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30”
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
h
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft-)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
ro
E
03
QL
Field
Test
Data
Stratum
§•« Description >~
° £33'—'
Equipment Installed
- 3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
S-1
5-7
24
15
13 13
14 24
27
S-1: Moist, medium dense, dark
brown, fine SAND, some (+) Silt, little
(+) Gravel, trace Wood fragments.
ND
FILL
10
S-2
10-12
24
13 4
2 2
S-2: No Recovery.
ND
IV
15
S-3
15-17
24
19.5
1 2
2 2
S-3: Wet, soft, gray, Organic Clayey
SILT.
ND
ORGANIC CLAYEY SILT
17 ’
Bottom of boring at 17 feet.
20
25
30
Concrete 0-T
Soil Cuttings
1-3’
Bentonite 3-4'
-2" PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5'
-Sand 4-15’
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
1. Field testing results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic
vapor meter equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
2. Gravel in tip of spoon.
See log key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-205
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT MA GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
Q2\ GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-207
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: James Roehrig
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 17
Date Start - Finish: 11/5/2014 - 11/5/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30”
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
h
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
10
15
20
25
30
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate.
No.
S-1
S-2
S-3
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
Pen.
(in)
5-7
10-12
15-17
Rec.
(in)
24
24
24
17
24
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
7 4
9 6
2 1
2 2
2 3
4 2
13
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
S-1: Dry, medium dense, brown, fine
SAND, some (-) Silt, trace Brick.
S-2: No Recovery.
S-3: Wet, medium stiff, gray, Organic
SILT. Shell fragments throughout
sample.
Bottom of boring at 17 feet.
Field
Test
Data
Stratum
§-£. Description
o
ND
ND
ND
FILL
10 '
ORGANIC SILT
17
Equipment Installed
- 3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-1'
Soil Cuttings
1-3’
Bentonite 3-4'
-2” PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5'
-Sand 4-15'
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
1 Field testinq results represent total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using a ThermoEnvironmental 580B organic
’ vapor meter equipped with a photoionization detector (PID) and 10.6eV lamp. Results in parts per million by volume (ppmv). ND indicates nothing detected (<0.1 ppmv).
See loq key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made. _
Boring No.
GZ-207
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT_MA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-209
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: J. Roehrig/K. Kerigan
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/6/2014 - 11/7/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
h
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
10
15
20
25
30
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
en.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
NO SAMPLES TAKEN
SOIL CLASSIFIED FROM AUGER
CUTTINGS
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
Test
Data
§•£. Description
Q in'
FILL
15 '
3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-1'
Soil Cuttings
1-3'
Bentonite 3-4'
-2” PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5'
-Sand 4-15'
-2” PVC Screen
5-15'
1. Suspected Wood from 6.5 to 8 feet bgs.
See loo key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made _____
Boring No.
GZ-209
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
OZ\
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-210
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.:
Foreman:
Logged By:
New England Boring
Donald Dunklee
J. Roehrig/K. Kerigan
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/7/2014 - 11/7/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2578.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth Casing Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
Samp
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.) Value
SPT
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
co
E
Q)
SL.
Field
Test
Data
Stratum
§■£. Description >~
° [D
Equipment Installed
- 3” Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-0.5’
Soil Cuttings
0.5-2.5’
Bentonite 2.5-4’
NO SAMPLES TAKEN
FILL
10
15
15 ’
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
20
25
30
-2" PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5’
-Sand 4-15’
-2” PVC Screen
5-15’
See log key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types. Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-210
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-211
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: J. Roehrig/K. Kerigan
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/10/2014 - 11/10/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2578.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Dept
h
ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
10
15
20
25
30
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate
No.
S-1
S-2
S-3
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
Pen
(in)
3-5
8-10
13-15
Rec.
(in)
24
24
24
13
12
10
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
1. Sample rods stained purple at 12 feet.
2. Top 1-inch of sample S-3 was purple.
3. Slight petroleum-like odor 13 to 15 feet bgs.
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
S-1: Top 2": Brown, fine SAND, trace
Silt.
Middle 2": White, Sandy
CRYSTALINE Substance (firm)
Middle 5": Red, BRICK.
Bottom 4": Dark brown, Organic SILT,
little Gravel, little possible Slag.
S-2: Top 7": Moist, yellow, Sandy
CRYSTALINE Substance (soft)
Bottom 5" Moist, dark gray, SAND,
little red Brick-like material (firm), trace
Silt.
S-3: Wet, dark brown, Organic SILT,
little Decomposed Vegetation.
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
Field
Test
Data
£ Stratum
g-g Description j- —
^ LU
FILL
12 '
ORGANIC SILT
15 '
Equipment Installed
- 3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-1'
Soil Cuttings
1-3'
Bentonite 3-4'
-2” PVC Riser
+3-5'
-Sand 4-15'
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
loo kev for explanation of sample descriptor and identification procedures. Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
Actual transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may
See I _
types. Actual transitions may be gradual,
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made.
Boring No.
GZ-211
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETTEVERETTMA.GPJ; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
171521.10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT_EVERETT_MA.GPJ: STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
GZA
GZ\
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-213
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.:
Foreman:
Logged By:
New England Boring
Donald Dunklee
J. Roehrig/K. Kerigan
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/10/2014 - 11/10/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30"
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Type: Split Spoon
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Groundwater Depth (ft.)
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
Casing
Blows/
Core
Rate..
10
15
20
25
30
No.
S-1
S-2
S-3
Sample
Depth
(ft.)
0-2
4-6
11-13
en.
(in)
Rec
(in)
24
24
24
12
10
12
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
S-1: Moist, brown, fine SAND, some
Gravel, trace Silt, trace roots, trace
concrete.
S-2: Black, Organic SILT, some
Wood, trace Brick, trace Sand, trace
Gravel.
S-3: Wet, purple, fine to coarse
SAND, little Gravel, trace Silt, trace
Slag-like material.
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
L_
CD
Field
£
E
Test
0 ^
CD
a:
Data
Stratum
FILL
15 '
3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
Concrete 0-1'
Soil Cuttings
1-3'
Bentonite 3-4'
-2" PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5'
-Sand 4-15'
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
1 Drill cuttings begin surfacing with purple coloring at 7.5 feet bgs.
2. Purple coloring did not appear natural.
171521 10 100-300 SERIES WYNN EVERETT EVERETT M AGP J; STANDARD BORING EQUIP WYNN EVERETT; 1/23/2015
TEST BORING LOG
\ GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers and Scientists
Wynn Everett
Everett, Massachusetts
BORING NO.: GZ-214
SHEET: 1 of 1
PROJECT NO: 171521.10
REVIEWED BY: JR
Drilling Co.: New England Boring
Foreman: Donald Dunklee
Logged By: J. Roehrig/K. Kerigan
Type of Rig: Truck
Rig Model: Diedrich D-90
Drilling Method:HSA
Boring Location:
Ground Surface Elev. (ft.):
Final Boring Depth (ft.): 15
Date Start - Finish: 11/7/2014 -11/7/2014
H. Datum:
V. Datum:
Auger/Casing Type:
I.D./O.D.: 4.2576.25"
Hmr Weight (lb.): 140 lbs
Hmr Fall (in.): 30”
Other: Auto Hammer
Sampler Tvoe: SDlit SDOon
Groundwater Dept
h
ft.)
I.D./O.D (in.): 1-3/872"
Sampler Hmr Wt: 140 lbs
Sampler Hmr Fall: 30"
Other:
Date
Time
Water Depth
Casing
Stab. Time
Depth
(ft)
10
15
20
25
30
Blows/
Core
Rate.
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft-)
Pen.
(in)
Rec.
(in)
Blows
(per 6 in.)
SPT
Value
Sample Description
Modified Burmister
NO SAMPLES TAKEN
SOIL CLASSIFIED FROM AUGER
CUTTINGS
Bottom of boring at 15 feet.
3" Protective Steel
Standpipe (Stickup
FILL
15 ’
Soil Cuttings
1-3'
-Bentonite 3-4'
-2“ PVC Riser
+2.5 - 5’
-Sand 4-15'
-2" PVC Screen
5-15'
See log key for explanation of sample descriptions and identification procedures Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and bedrock
types Actual transitions may be gradual Water level readings have been made at the times and under the conditions stated Fluctuations of groundwater may
occur due to other factors than those present at the times the measurements were made
Boring No.
GZ-214
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
SH
o
jj
I >
cS 5 S
Sh fei
O h
« J1
hJ ^
tJ
<
CQ
“ 5
S 'S
5
6
</i
V)
UJ
•5
Lh
cj
O
1
+J
s
cd
U
J
u
0
t§ sg
hQ
ctf
■5 ^
d
c
—- CL
S ?
3 u
C 5
CD
^ 0
S til
E ^
! s
CD
•2 K
•a ^
*> >
c UJ
W
1 N
4? ! &
UJ _
0 E
a
K
r O
o s
Z Cl
o u
H °
a. ^
w 1
U S.
LlJ C/5
Bm O
u z-
J §
Q_ re
S I
y 5 >2
"T3 ^
u
2
c —
E <
v
U >
O' £>
<:
O' g
0)
=
T3 c/>
s -
QJ
t .§
2^6
2 >
o »a
X) .£ 2
J 3 2 «
O C
T «-
V> %
m .2,
UJ o
„ *d °*
S I I
T3 <U c
E 5
-o
<u
CL
U
2
«2 c
c
3
T3
1 2
- .2
~ '£.
o
(A ^
— <u
o S
^ £
< §
O -o
>
= o
ST *
S o
E 2
M E
.S o
t °
o
o. -a
* I
o I
■S “
6
E E?
g .S « _re
to O
■8 c
! &
E E
V CO
h i
“ ca
£ fc
g J*
c o
<u
•8 5
I a
x o cd
o'
«j -n
•o & c
5 o «
H JS -
a. a i
o " °
S „ I
_ -e td
•8 .
•g S
cr . <2
£ 8 S
4= I 1 4
o 2 6
X
_ s
>> 0> re
- ° E
g * -8
i s J
<u 1
■s
O <D
1 B
■ S ,| =5
3 C
* I
Q.
E
o 4S
o ^
2 1
5 5
O <u j2
£ O c
4 ) C o
X C E
o P <0
<§ i
£ £ £
< 2
o
2 =
C/5 • =
in -f
UJ >
~a
c ^
i2 <->
C' 5 E
o
& O
I >
II
« 2 E
W 2 j:
•5
S
E
2
e
s
1
: a I s 2 I
Bl
u
2
8
I
E
ca ^
Cl
E
O =
Bl 5
UJ <
O
So 000000000000
■^50000000000000
r ~oooooooooo
U U U
CJ u
o o
0000000
■^I'lO'O'O'O'O'O'O 'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O
"5 o o o o o o o o o o o 0 5 o o o o o o o
« <n rr o
E O O O
5 m c /3 co
" — CO
Z o o o
o w w w
*& o o o
1 N N N
»ooo
CO O M M ^
O — — O O
in m m in </>
t"- O' — — r**)
0 0 — 00
m m m m m
— — — <N ON
OOOOO
N N N N N
OOOOO
o o
m m
<N (N
O ON
— O
w m
Os —
o o
m m
ON c*->
0000
N N
o o
N N
O O
't \D O'
0000
m m m m
n ^ 'O 00
OOOO
m m m m
m m m
OOOO
N N N N
OOOO
m m m m
© — 0*1 V“l
— 000
m m m m
N N N N
OOOO
. t in \0 h CO O' o
1— 1— c—- c— t— t— t— t— c— r~~ t—• t— r— r~~- r—- 1 1 r~~- 1
o O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O ^3
t t ’T t
■^TfTt^TrTfTj-TtTfTtTf^TjTfTr
2.
- i
Sh
o
+J
ce
Sh
o
X
cS
hJ
<1
PQ
.c ^
If
L *
l}
!
^ is
*-J
I
7 ^
U.
9 c
^3
§ g
o tu
u
= fS
C >o
u o
< o
s <
- s
LU
8
_ o
« N
Q O
*T 3
O
o
i
o
Z
CN 41
US
£
3
°. Z
u o
s ^
si
“ 1
c u
^ 2
u %
a> u
00
«
CL
1 8
?3
|5
sC
I
g
CO w
X
Li
o
■M
cd
-
O
X
cd
h-5
PQ
. J
.0 **
■M
* §
l|
•2 a
t *§
I *
* -j
i £
i' Ns
o
F-
ss
a
it.
o
a
x
Ll
_• Bu
B U
§ 2
E '
<Sf
< ?
Ss
Z Cl
u u
s
DO
2
o.
u
a
e
Z *>
a z
I |
1 5 E b
3) B.
s
y §
§
E S S
X n g
W is £
o
iz>
as
*o
c
cd
C/5
2
X
CL
g
c
JD
V
3
3
X
W
•o
UJ
3
3
X
Q
cd
c
3
cd
a
3
cd
4>
Cd
H
2
w
ft.
CL
o
cd
’3
X
X
o
2'
M
T3
c
o
X
cd
U
>
>«
CO
y
V)
3
u
9
Q.
y
>
cd
x
o
DU
C
cr
x
c
C/5
C/5
*o
2
UJ
0)
>
3
Q
3
c_
3
3
CL
CO
3
cd
V
M
C/5
C/5
UJ
U
O
-i
-o
o
-C
o
Q
3
—
<
C
02
3
CT
<
•a
o
c/5
-o
o
C/5
g
a
CL
6
C/5
*o
’3
a*
J
cd
3
3
cd
2
9
3
o
3
o
o
02
c«
1
o
02
3
cr
<
o
V
3
cr
<
3
CL
-o
o
Q
O
S
H
U
s
VO
vt
00
I
£
C/5
H
Z
u
2£
c*
S
a
< < cq < u y u
«n o o o o o o
O (N in >0 - N Tf
O O O O Vi «/i tr>
f*1 f*5 rO f*") fO f*1
< CD U 1
O O O •/■>
oo m r*i m
O O O
r*"> «/"> •/■*
E
8 2
cd X
E u
£ W
S fc S 5 O S <
.r < u
C 2 2 £
^ CJ
2 CQ
•o Q
*3 CQ
c/> Q
• UJ
—i
£
o
—
<
O
>
•5 S
t
— o
I CJ
<
O vO
_ _ — — l/~l
ONt^f" — —
o — ^ Tt o o
r~ f- oo oo
a m < 2
o. &
S3
l. a,
u W
<
O
> ^ „ _ - -
« £ >. 3 < co
U
o
m o «
< a Q D 1 ■ u Q
— cuo — ©ootooow
ooooo»n'Or^r' — m-rj-Tr
oo — — csrNrsoooo
00000000000000 O' O' O' ON
< CQ
< <
O VO _
«/■» >n no on
o o o o
O' On On O'
185 Trances Avenue. Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-718! Fax: 401-461-4486 hill' //umv I SSI .alxiralon com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-718! Fax:401-461-4486 him. '"m\ I.SSUNumur' com
Dependability • thralily ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 3 of 31 Page 4 of 31
u
O
■M
03
o«
O
43
CO
hJ
hJ
PQ
11
If
•c ^
,5 *4
S =
-a uj
O .2
I I
C/3 «/3
I
2 2 «
J J 2 g>
,3 .3 1
•— 1 ^ O. c/i
c /3 c /3 g
w V 3 S C
14 uj yi D
3
u
S
t2
X X
u a
9;
si- -
a y
on
CO
CL
- 3
rj- ^
\0
2 ♦
o
5 *
in
g
1
s
I
_r ft.
3 U
c S
V <*=•
E '
o £
.h a>
3
<
Ss
<N
O
00
o 2
„ 2 S
c O rr
>,5 S
6 2
£ ■=>
§ 2
Z ft.
o u u
~o 42
a. ^ ^
E 2 - 0
« £ c/3
cfl a ♦-
— C/3 C
| « 2
rt <5
D cl
CQ
o
s
2
O
■M
CO
Sh
o
43
cO
h-]
<
m
.1 ■£
I £
5 S
n
|]
^ 2
s~ "s
t
o
CO
I
3
C /3
C/3
UJ
5
B
_• ft*
3 o
c ^
E *
5 £
■ - 4)
> >
C UJ
UJ "
5*
o 9
1 |
a 2
z ft.
! |
u u
L.
o
u.
c
# o
cc
Cj
f
o
u
o
I
ft.
-
e
<
a.
u
Q
■s
.0
iu
Q
<
2
s £
5 S'
2 1
2 Q
$
«
j
l
<
X
5
<
u
15
>
CL
UJ
—
t/o
3
2
u
o
>
•o a
CD
X
o <
H U
I
CL
UJ
u
1
T 3
i
U
CQ
IS
1<
>
W >
H- >
rj
0 y
5
W *3
m <
0 ^
U
00 U
On U
8
"O
u
IE
<5 U
X >
90 U sO U
S<
> =
S i
x U
> =
c/i —
o 2
N S
<N <
oc U
Z
9
CQ
U <
0 - >
1
a
1
•fi
9 - -5
3
8 -a’
£ 2
"" c/o
«&,*
y o
J £
1 *1
*c
& U
. a>
k, o
JC a
0 c X)
3 c
? L>
s s
T 3 S
S -g
1 1
E 1/1
■«
? a>
2 § E
*5 o - E
l ^
s I
* !
c" I
s s
§ i
i u
I- 5
6
5 = c
CA
■3
i
w Q
L -
S 1
■>. 0
Its
S 5
s 5
| 0
1 “
“ g 1
|?5
O y
® U
§ 3
S 3
II
§
s _
o. o
I ^
•a
« <
S =
2 2
O <
VO U
c 13
a - §
w» -T 3
— 4 > "
13 c £
2 8 £
a> a> ju
^ Q. ^
o
z
z z
c/J t /5
^ £
13
3
a
2
<
u
^ c 0
c 3 o
Q <=
■a "2
I 1
5 |
.S -3
-£
6
£
o a
§ i
I £
1 S>
S’ »
2 2
8.1
a: l
1 1
1 5
a S’
2 u
_« O'
a
8 .
i ■
55 'O
io P
3
i S’
a »
3 §.
2 a
■2 5
•2 f
2 o
8 s
§ <
c g
1 s
1 i
2 O
I a
.£ a
II
c0 u)
0 > ^
O. O
I S
«* -5
0 > _
O -3
§ 1
g I
o ^
< ■s
<u
£
■a. | 8
£ t 8
8 8==
. <U *0 O
* s ?
J o a
« -g I
TJ 2
? O
£ 2
O S
o 2
i g
.£• S
1 1
O’ <
f f
f 2
£ 2
11
u. U
O. C
il
U '5
: 1
?
2 •a
6 e ■
£ ^
1 •s
f 8
E Q
2 uj
I x '
3 ft.
«« >
< C0
- I
0 > CL
•S <
2 .0
4= c:-
CL O
s- s
13 |
2 -
^ E
z
s
C /1
o o
Z Z
£C
C/l C /0
£ £
i
o
•5
3
I
e S; §
3 Jr .$•
s* 8 |
2 s
O 3
o. a
S 5 ^
£ < ^
^ u -S
■ 8,3 ? «
Ills
*5 So r c‘ ^
n s&j 1
i 1 S 8 |
a -O S 1 2
| |I § ~
V *'
<5
^i|li
c^ 5 o
5 “ S £
OHSS &
=5 = S « 5
rtf 2> fr > <
hm
^ u L) ^ c
a S > ^ ta
O* < •« . 5 |
5 y r| I
g -jg 3 ^ a.
- .. 5 J "c ««
^ £ S U 1
O *• 5 -3
« j; -a J 3
f .5 s a
5 -5 5 I
s 2 1 l
2 a c u
1 «1 §
t j r g
c ® “ >2
1 ^ | 8.
1 k,
^ h a ?
I
a
a
b
a
I
■c
3
I
I
-
os
2 i
•a' -5
S -g
■5 s
§ s
B* " 5 i
vi -e
t 1
s §
-a <u
ll
• r l
a 8
1 ^
ft. -c
Sk <l
a a
§•--
■? I
s &•
•ft L
a’ ■?
J -S
bt 1
l §
^9 Vj
§1
Z. .5
a a
§ I
ft. a
"a ft
a
j |
•i ^
ft.
| /
2
1 ^
i
ft
a
o<
11
I I
J ^
Li %>
a -c
.s< -
tr
■3 e
e 3 «
? I 2
^ 5 a
§
o
•3
3
*g
ill
1 I n
2 ^ CL
00
CO
CL
|
? «
— u
II
&
2 l
r- 'J
P I*
£.
I
L
6
c
u u u
e2
CQ
o
«/">
o
c*i
•d
o
c
o
u
X
UJ
gi
Sal;
* *
SI 1
8 8
S 8
* ^
u u
m §
9;
Sh
o
+■>
C8
(H
o
-JQ
CO
hQ
If
11
M
*5
CQ
I « o
f W M
fr t K
2 2 2
J JJ 1
8
2?
-o
oo
£
W W c ^
C/D C/D w
LL) U) C/D D
01
—
o
2
£
5 5
U.I _
ol
E
j|
8 8
§ 8
-I
-
zl
2
&
is
u
_• O.
a o
§ s
f 5
= w
? 3
4> C/D
° T*
22 §
c O ^
>> N ^ >o
S o 5 “
Q S 2
i is J
o' £ & o
£ I | f
S S a |
u C Q £.
CQ
o
5
z
c
o
I
eo
a
X
UJ
M
£ T9
I *
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htlp.//'vw« 1 SSI,iiboratorv.com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htliv/Avvv'v KSSUIxirelurv com
Dependabilit> ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability « Quality • Service
Page 7 of31 Page 8 of31
(
6
c
__r 0 -
S U
§ 5
I ~ £
c w
TtI “
% ^
§ •r.
2 S
O
o £ X z
Sfsl
6 2
D H
| 8 '
§ 8
Z c_ i
0) «
U U
■*-
o
2
£
CD
o
u u
^IvO v£
"I r-j rs
8 8
$ 5
SI-
NO
X
^r
o
X
es ♦
U.
£•
o
u
=
u.
*/~l
oc
O
©
r*
o
Tf
s
6
a
r-
o
rr
O
■a |-
5 1 °
5 |
J J
« ^
E -s
C/5 C/3
C/3 C/3 „ _
UJ UJ C/3 3
y
u
o
1
+->
s
05
n
£
u
1
o
s§
—
■5
05
,<u
h-J
£
v*.
CD
©
CD
a
w
1
•-J
?S
fi
—r 0-
Is
I ~
o «
- 4>
> >
e UJ
w "
1
< ^
o 9
s B
Z a.
N ^ <N
o 5 ’
S °
12 I
I 15
C/5 RJ —
— C/5 C
U U U (S
5
"8
s
e2
CD
6
8
i
s
II
us u
u u
8 8
II?
5 5
si-
£
J|
o
O'
V
00
«
a.
o
p
s
I § 'S
> C/5 C/5
£ £ x
o o —
o o 2 ao
X> X3 c
« (d « c
^ ^ O. c/>
m w P t:
C/5 C/5 £ C
LU LU c/5 D
u u u
3
5
t2
CQ
O
'r.
O
ro
-d
c
Z
u
!l§ i
as
vC
w
fN
S *
oh -
>• J2
— c
1
X
Sh
o
4->
cS
Sh
O
43
cC
h-J
■s s ,
:8 *
« §
!J
ii
ii
K >
<5
CQ
„ s
§ o
fe § r=
Z <8 5 „
g* t X -o
2 S J ai
2 2 1 .*
2 2 s »
ca ca (Q C
J ^ a m
C/5 C/5 F tf
on on « J~
UJ uj on D
ec
a
s
e2
e
-I
m i
a- -
^1 rs <N
_ vC \C
^ — —
|° 2
"3 2 2
5 ^ ^
< 1 i
a a
§ §
a
5
$
i2
K
_- CL
a u
g s
E '
II
C MJ
Uh
I
<*
o 9
it
11
11
o u
= 8
C/5 ©
© ^
N cn
o 5 00
q -
is I
I E £
C/5 CB —
II §
s & i
CD
©
1
2
Si}
g>
CL
i
.£•
o
IS
U
u.
Sm
O
■M
Ll
o
-Q
c«
hJ
05
.1 -s
I .#
?|
< ^
c *c
II
s S
ill
g 1 t x -o
2 2 £ oo
2 2 * ^
o o 2 oo
x> x> ^ c
c3 « 4) c
— 1 - 1 a. wj
go c /3 £ •■=
M t/l « C
UJ w co D
6
c
—- o-
2 U
1 s
I s
UJ
c
I
<
O 9
o
C/3
<N
o
£ -
S3 2
Z a.
II |
i I" £
D fl © i
G G G a £
5
£
t2
CD
o
«/~l
o
m
TD
C
2
c
o
o
rt
X
UJ
^ u
u u
s§ §
11=
5 5
* *
bio
oh
o
■<T
00
eo
CL
VO
2 *
o
*n
oo
i
CL
y
2
M-l
S
Cj l
< ?
oS
ll
S n
Z ft. co
lu ■§
o o o Z
G G G a
«
CJ
2
*2
§
8
2
6
X
UJ
^ u
u u
g§ §
3!
</■> */■>
iri <JS
* *
bio o
ah ^
> A
« 5
C E
< <
•a
5
2 s
VO >
ll
M
!.
vn
u us
U v
J§ §
&
92
o
CC
Sh
o
X
c«
h-5
hJ
PQ
i |
1.8
j |
•S cS
J|
5 ’»
2 £
tT —
—
5 I 5
> go w
£• fr x
oo-5
2 2b
o o
X> X)
3 3*
E
C/5 C/3 = -
C/5 C/3 vv
UJ (D C/3 D
5
v
s
f2
» *
•<?
* *
US US
a|-
8 8
s s
Cn
§
5
£
3
K
as
s
CL
u
5
' o
g «
§ s
uu g
o
g g = Z
. . N
& o
2 9
*- o
g o.
s' I
CU C/3
£■ O
E ^
a *-
5/3 s
a» o
U U U Q
CD
o
2
us us
u u
m §
as
Ft
O
+j
ec
|H
O
-fi
-
h-J
t-J
<1
M
§ 6
t— O'
2 £
2 S
i|
Worl
Sami
Soil
li
C £ a
o o —
2*
2 2 M
2 2%
3 3*
CO
C/3 C/3 £ -
C/3 C/3 « C
UJ LL) C/3 D
X
—’
4/
f2
£ £ £
S 5
* *
u: us
9'
E
,I|
8 8
§ §
-i
a
2
a:
u
s
* oo
111
C o ,
‘nS-
S o 5 ->
Q 9 2
1 £3 |
o' E g- O
_ £ a § 2
ills!
u u
cc
o
5
j=
8
2
c
O
5
CO
fi
X
UJ
3 S
I !
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 hup /A»ww I SSI .alruratury com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hUnArau I.SSLaUmilun com
Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 15 of 31 Pagel6of31
II
u u
u u
8 8
»/■>
■"I oi ri
O | •?,
- c
aj 5 S
«H jjJ
O !>
i 1 *
ee U
i-J *S
s 's
<
PQ
•o
O
I
C/3 C/3
fc* fr
o
e
X -T3
£ C 0°
2 3 ^
j> £ 2 g>
.3 3 £
^ ^ a «
w w E s
on c/3 3 J=
UJ UJ c/3 D
ec
o
s
t2
* a
u u
ol
y y
3
S
I
£
12
sJ
s
8
_r eu
« U
c ^
E ' ^
c C o
O P ^ CN
- o5 o “
© rr
, N S
O £
UJ
o
<s
<
8
QS"
<u «
E &
« " -o 43
~ _ 03 £
« E
Z 1 C/1 n
5 « p
r r U Q al
« a>
O U
x
UJ
> -2
§ i
< <
o Ji
+J
CC
In
t-J *i
J| fi
. 1 K •»
If
|:|
5 m
<
PQ
§ o
— o
2 5
O
11
11
C/3 C/3
C
1 1 £ “
£ £ 2 ff
J J 1 l
on on £ ?
on on « e
UJ UJ cn D
5
(2
U U
III §
a-
i-! u
a- -
y y
i §
-J|
C
S|
5
X
§
12
X
K
3
ss,
s°
•j! oi °s
W m o
c S 2
>, N S O'
S o 5 «
D P 2
e- 45 T3 4£
g Q. 2 ^
rri p D. o
8 « E 05
a. 05 a —
£ I - I
C U C a
CD
o
"8
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 him /Amu. I SSI ahurnton com 185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 Imp .'««» 1 .SSI.iilxmii,ir\..c.om
Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Dependability • Quality • Service
Page 17 of 31 Page 18 of 31
W ©
® •5
£l§ §
_,| ' J <N
—
o
+->
CC
•-
o
X
ce
PQ
11
|J
1J
t *5
11
* j
* ’a
— o
2 5
§1
00 C/3
o o
X X)
3 3
00
00
E
tu UJ w D
a
u
s
f2
N _ —
2 I
*
u
al“
£
3
a a
§ §
_i
c
7\
£
§
X
U.
O
K
3
s
u
_• CL
■3 O
£ S
<
o S
o
£ M
8 r.
C/3 00
CO O
2 ^
' 5 s
O ro
Q -
VO
jj T3 X
a. « 2
Z CL
J* O
E oo
— - - 00 C
C C C fl! «
a> a> u .2: <->
x x x c0 q_)
UU U Q 0.
fc- c g
o I *
CO I E
*H fej
© 1 }
ed I j|
i_j s ]
iJ
<1
w
| I 5
> C/3 C/3
t t X
8 £ S
2 2-1
C/3 C/5 £
C/3 C/3 £
LJ LJ C/j
00
§
X,
I
,T
K
I*.
r-*
t-*
P=
Cj
U
S
? *
B 1/5 o
s g °
iu ^
“ « o
C O r.
>-. Ni
£ o
D 9 -
S 3
§
— 4>
If
o 5
£ C/3
= l l «
U U U Q
£■8 tj
fii o
E </3
«c
s
{2
cc
o
5
X
1
2
u u
9:
q|-
-i
£
"I
c -
MS
“ i
! l
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, K1 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hop /Avm\ I SSI .aboratorv.com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 httn .'ww w l.SSLnbotntorx coni
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 19 of 31 Page 20 of 31
u
u u
as 2
as
Jx
O
c«
Sx
o
43
cC
hJ
PQ
11
ft
!l
— o
2 5
O
■B |-
5 « o
5 » «
£ £ *
O O -
2 2
o o
_D 43
J3 J3
c/) c/3
C/5 C/3 ..
UJ UJ C/5
*3 00
2 ^
5 |
« c
6 vj
5 ‘e
•+^
£
« a
ud ^
cl
E
21
a a
§ §
g
£
-j
S
y
£
§
—r ft.
3 y
c
<u
e • -
I I g
o
> r /5 OO
UJ £ o
C O T3-
c — --
^ o 5 "
e s 2
B -S •g -3
fl) O- —
o- £ 2* o
CQ
o
Z CL
— — — CO fll
U U U Q cl
||l I
C p m
■Ll oi <N
tx e ij
o -I ■*
It
S c
Is
<S
tx
o
43
tf .5 3
kJ *:!
<1
PQ
£ S
* &-
5 5 0
> C/5 C/5
& *
Sal
« « 5
II s
J JS t
£
oo
?
oo
£
75 ^ r ^
75 75 w .
UJ UJ 7) 3
t2
S-
■a 2:
$ 5
a-
a
i
-I
PQ
P]
X
g
X
£
?c
r J
CL
y
|i s
*»
75 »
W n O
c O 2
8 5
q 9 °
X- V
8 1
I J5
"S
a. o
E
03 —
«*> fi
CQ
o
*S
j=
1
2
« p
£ o
u u d cl
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax: 401-461-4486 hlln./Aum I SSI aUrranirv.com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http Acme 1 VIUiIxuuM' com
Dependability • Quality • Service Dependability ♦ Quality • Service
Page 21 of 31 Page 22 of31
II
8 8
H in IN
0-2
|f
(8 « f
u
O
A
03
hJ
u
< i
I ts
II
S 2
i s
2-
<
PQ
•6 U
O Jb
-a |_
-S 5 o
> C/1 l/l
t *
o o 2
J J3 -2
^ Ql eg
c/5 c/3 g -ti
V3 « C
UJ LU C/5 D
5
S
e2
e e
* «
u u
E
-jl
8 8
ji
a
S
^2
s
-3
s
H
PS
s
' 0<
o
2
• IT
c °
<5 c/i
; 5 o
w 3
S3 K
c O ,
|i N 5 «
JOS 1 '
0 9"..
w O T3 “J
Sail
O
C/3
E c
9 E
C/3 eg
U U u Q a.
Sm
o
4-1
«
ll
o
A
ee
h-1
14
:1 >
11
H
■2 S
.C **
PQ
5
£
TC
i 9
O
c —
I I 5
^ C/3 C/3
£ & M
o o
£
u i: «
2 2 S
J Jig
C/3 C/3 £ tS
71 fl C
UJ UJ C/3 ID
GW
1
E
S js s »
5 b 5 £
“3
>, N
=* O
9 =
Q -
■ill
£ S
a. i/i
I 1
U O
“ i
« 4 )
— a.
«
C
{2
8
1
.c
1
2
u u
8 8
*n «/■*
SO 20
fN «N
£
-I
-J|
c
71
8 8
5 5
I]
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, Ri 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 him /M«« I SS1 ah.raloo com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 line \uv« I .SSU.Ixmilorv com
Dependability • Quality • Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 23 of 31 Page 24 of 31
s-
O
—
s-
O
-Q
eB
<
CQ
.1 ^
I |
II
11
1
S|
< fN
S''s
0
■s
S—
O
1
4->
s
03
1
Lh
O
t§
Co
U2
03
■8
■g
S
S
•-J
5
cd
©
s
5
to
CD
.©
J
e-«
w
8
o
=s
t
o
rt
1
2
ro
4J
ra
Q
c
o
u
ra
3
O’
I
CL
3 U
c
« ^
E is
o p
-— a3
> >
e uj
U j c
o £
If
3a
o
<j u
U M
uj id
# I
g 3
1 i
S’ 3
| |
s §
I s
§ §
s s
° a
2 s;
I I
S’ S’
II
i i
a a
a a
8 8
8 8
S a
2 t
% %
s s
f f
? 1
S-l
o
■M
05
SH
o
J3
c«
hJ
m
14
if
11
* -a
J3
i s
s >
<N
i
o
F*
2 ©
- 5
I a
O ju
■a |-
5 i s
> c/3 c/3
£ fr X
o o
•a
sss|
I i s -
J 2 1 a
8 sg I I
UJ UJ c/3 O
ec
—
w
s
e2
q|"
E
j|
||i §
Cl oc oc
■HI <N <N
S S
— I
—
*-J
1
e
fc
5
CL
u
2
I i s
II a
> > s
1
2
UJ
>, N
s 5
©
3 3
o. o
E
— — ~ c/3
r- r- r- £ «
u u u
CQ
o
*8
o
3
CO
i=
x
UJ
K 2
Jt
5 T9
1 1
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 htip./A\u%v I SSI .ahuratorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http wwu I.SSLalxuiUorN com
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 25 of 31 Page 26 of 31
fc-
o
c«
•-H
o
43
cS
h-3
h-J
<
m
14
11
11
11
■s S
i
£
b
o
«
2
s
s:
r-~
r^.
a;
G
-2
-■e
I
>
u
<
o £
zl
« s
Z a.
1 1
o o
g
S
u
g
_i
D
S
ei
Q
c
Q
Q
O
_)
5
o
-j
j
ai
2
J
i
b
o
u
■ -
w
D
H
o
z
c S
° g
g s
c fc
le
S 8
o
C W
o s
C § ?
t: 3
8 . ”
4> o
__ (/>
i I
11
01 s
8 I
. 8
5 c
r* «
1 =
♦3 ««J
S o
oo 5
3 E
_3 O
« eO
8 O
~ V
2 cfv
, S <->
> « 2
oo "5
2 o
8 -5
$ t
~o -o
11
s
< Q
.2 >
■ Cl S
E “
5 5
t/> ai
2 i! « E c «»
&J | E
^OOcIi
_ <*- «— o -s o
i == f -~
5 E E 5 5 S
S j J 2 £ li
g "
13 3 3 3
Sue
§ Z u w
I |
J- c2
2 5
g
a &
■ ^
I §
3 at:
8 o
£* Z
■S
-C
o
2
2 «
>. c
« «
^ I
g1
_2 c
J !
« =
O c/>
D
3 Q Z
b£;
Q ai
x. 2 2 _s _: Qa t.
tor — <N c*»
o
—
<
* - ®
< z iicrt
o
p
5 .
o
Sample and Cooler Receipt Checklist
-SbHUm u| Xpoisnj jo Bi«qj Q) w3ogq3 \\* n«ui-a 9m\&
; S
86ed
« JWWlA$) ^ K»- ■»"U|,
<«jnj»uOK?) Xq P«ymntHJWH
(•jrn^As) <qp»jTbuMM
'h :am i Bj3(,uj3 i j3 i°°3
:VN ON soA Pmui sp^s
ON
J ptiprn i ji ry pirn qj , n~i | | isiiqujujoo
r'oio JJVK 4-iwv£. : Xq p3|dun>s
s»A
Iusssjj J3|003
CTIU-J od'M'M noo «I«M »VS-MS J3HMpunaJO-M0 J310Min>/IA-MAV pi|OS<IS l'°S-S KIOT W
r
■ Tl
ana
mrt
Si
in
m
m
-6 l^vuz-g 1513V 3'qww-l 1I0»W9 HOBK-S tOKH-> KJSZH-t 1DH 2 dN* l »poD uonv.imid]
1-
1
W
*
0
V*
»
O -6
O-Q
So^-tOSTfoy 79
s
0
or.bo
pi
T"
4
yl
i
°-9
a h
<3 OS SOS-roi T%>
5
j
t o; b°
L
r
t |
H
<
i
° •/>
° c
h o<r £os tro \
5
0
ks-.«o
SL
h
) f
/
i
O -jp
Q'V
tro^ ios uo \ 7 ^
5
D
9his0
L
T
r
/
i
o ' t\
O’Ul
r's- ns 'oy 79
5
7
oo-o\
)
f
T
1
Oo|
0-.Q
0/5 tos io ) zy
5
“7“
srbO
S
V -
r
5<
\
9-S
S '9
gos lo | z 9
$
7
^TT^o
h
/ ■<
i
1
•/
i
O'?
oh
•)05S0^ ioj 29
5
7
<s : bo
c
n <
|
i
oh
Host os i oy 29
S
7
' Hi:wi
_
-z.
h i
_ i
I
I
I
X
r i
o-f
O 0
rogioS loi79
S
0
~TF^ci
Hi( IS|U,
)
Commtnl #
3 T
L _
•
■>
IT?
4
O
•
f
_
I
<
<
!
>
|
to
D
g
»
Z
l
0
«
?>
Z3
3
3
5
uaumuo^jo,,
(W3j [BuncwpJ
qidaa i3Miri
[« puiioop]
ifidsa wddfi
ourefvj 3|dures
xuiew
^-wsod 11103
0 -qiuo
auni
UOIU»l|O0
<11 ®[diires
P»1SS3
Analysis
L-wfojj :3 uiduJ |«?3ods
Sunuj pvijuof)
<XU£-8ZZ(m)
s
o2
IHU] aa^M :sun N l»toJd
Z90Z0 V
3PU3A V t|
*3o| ‘jtinauia
w ‘POOAVIOM
iqjspusA 6fZ
oj|Auaa»3 VZO
P|A*a — :J38eusp\ psfoJd VZO
M
OI'iniClO‘1* 0NV»fay
anoy] *3
^ ^
—
c
S3A
5|U013J|3
(j| 3 jp 3 SE 3 |d) :guiwo||Oj ?m jo Xug joj pafaid »qi S|
ZS3V
■ si!inn Suiuodsi)
ObLQIbl
ai loaroHd o\n ssa
■13H1Q 31\' AN TN HN A3 rM^vj^:p3|J3||0^ 3J3 *a S3|dures ajaqw 3)eis
' :Kg psAcudd v"
qsn)) pjEputis V. auigiuni
AdOlSflD JO NIYHO
98t't-!9fr(l0t')«J l8lM9t(lOt)
l IZZ- 016 Z 01 M ‘U01SUEJ3 ‘snusAV sooubjj sgi
OUJ ‘SuUMUlSuj ipspitufo UOISIAIQ
XlioinjoqBi SS3
ttJ
0
c O
ai o
E o'
u ^
10 CL
a o
< l/>
8;>
Q D lj
•—•DU
Q QJ
o' <u Q-
i_ -;r» i_
CL O O
(/) <u w
Ml >
fO (O
Q O
u
c
c
0)
E
c
o
k-
■>
c
UJ
o
u ^ w
o» Q )n
O ~ §J
< tj =
15
a. "o
• * OJ
c c CL
fl{ 0{ -
uuS
03
o
V
k.
c
o
Q.
■O
o>
X
u
0)
£
lA
E
V
(0
CL
X
QJ
03
in
ro
03
<u
>*
tN.
in
D
r-
c
(U
in
N
S
(0
4-«
03
4-J
c
L-
c
03
Q.
M
g
jn
jn
(0
ro
Cl
03
QJ
*-*
in
a
in
>
>-
T3
"O
c
O
0
10
Z
*-*
m
D
■*-<
m
D
_
•J
u
u
O
z
03
i_
03
L_
l.
03
03
<
<
5
5
H
fN
ro
z
CL
u
o
o
*o
ID
od
c
S!
<u
k_
o.
i.
_QJ
O
o
u
c
6
r~ =
in u
i >-
Q. X)
£ T3
10 QJ
m a-*
£ ^
* ?
T3 <0
OJ
Q.
6
(0
OJ
-C
v: u
$ 2
* 3
J2 C
U Qt
S in
U U
O O
U U
in in
»o 10
£ £
O N CO O
■O
o
4-»
L.
<L»
CT»
ro
C
<0
E
t;
o
o
l_
CL
o
U
T3
c
<0
Q)
Cl
E
o
o
U
o
u
■S
HI
c
a>
4 -»
m
ro
Page 29 of 31 1 1 Page 30 of 31
ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory
■5
I
I
■8
's
.§
1
I .?
5 5
ii
■c ^
s -s
j I
* I
£'s
co
a
u.
o
t-.
K
OS
£*3
r4
ir<
®. Z
X
E
Is
c
<u
E
c
o
’>
c
a
o _
^ w
J o
?<
co N
q a
<N
X
O
CM
o
■d
o
o
eo — <u
« CO
*o a.
«2 P
*5 flj
« V-
a. o
I -
j? g
. a.
s 8 - s
I 2
a. o
P x
— co —
co w. ^
1 s
§ lo
. oo
S w
o
^ S>
c<- O
° «
B
It O
c/> _0
8 js
3
O
>>
*. > «
QJ O 1
CO g
ec CL ,
a. a.
<u .
o “
c
— CL ~o
€|5
w <u
> o e
^ X <u
— <D
00
a. "£
W O
S -g
1 ©
s *
• £•
> O
“ 1
C i-
c o
>> X
£ J
w $
0£ u
to > jr
c _
5i <2
x
c
C/3 ©
o
5 O £
• • 1/1
• ■" o
.g §■
(U CD C
s s.
O 6
CL Q
oj fc— '
U
<u
5 «
< CL
T3
'5 T3
oo JJ
00 o'
1 £
(O
aj
* E
„ - 2
U IS>
U <1 3
£> M U
* £ =
IS
1
o
& &
<u o -a
■ S M 3
S 3 °
00 ’
S
•o w h
<L> <L> _
a c s
GO CL eC
- <L>
C/J «- >
>
f— o <2
O
T3 —
CO
£ 1
■5 ©
O f
<L>
O C/5
CL CO
C/3
^5 CL
J. 8
vO >
ll
= 5
1
I
5
E
U
a6ed
\
J (•m*u&S\ *4 p«AM0«»
njj±/9mrj
(inaAS) p*gw*M»«8
(•jni^cjl ioo4Aoo*L
Wff
( ~^Jw,nJ 6 l
cnhl bjh\o > l w maw
itOfam&c) Aq
mttimma
(•jnmjO^) Aq p*y*rt>un«y
—
KtH/OJ
*t*u* »a
(4in»»jflis) Aq p«u#3bcj(aH
/ tv / V *
^ papaau j* ty pi» qtf U13X 1 :siusuiui 03
/ 7^f >y 0 / '/> ;SJ nie/aduj3j. P|0O3
:VN on S3 A P*wi sjaag
r /»<7 ^ rrtWj 5 : Aq pa|dures
°N SS A^—\ l u3WJ d J3|003
mi'J-J l!OQ iQUMimiU'-XI-MO CT»MW»yns-A\S BWvpunojr>- M9 nuvanM-AMA »*P«IS-a P>|oS-aS I1°S-S «IOTW
ov
-V-
VA
wv
9V
-V-
3 ¥
4-
9¥
-P
ov
—t
e*
-4-
&V
-*
ov
1
9V
V0A-A KlpaJS-S K«I0 Jaqory-OV ss»IO-Q A|<M-a Ms. J3uinuo 9
-61’VUZ-* 1>PV 3|V<KV-C 1ICPW-9 HO*N-S tOKH-» 'K3SZH‘C 'IDU'Z 'JN-1 »P<0 0OIHAJ3CUJ
1
>
1
O'lf
Oh
^0SSo9> b0| -2.C)
c
W:oi
~r
Or.
'A
l
o ■h
og
V.o<io^ WO|2EJ
5"
D
tf.01
i/
a
l
o<r
o(j
tlo^io&^o^S)
O
Vi<:oi
8/
K
l
on
o-o 1
1 l^o\c,<io \29
s
O
w&o
LI
1
a-oi
©•-&
bPA^o^q.OIT.9
5
3
J &-* 0
V
j
yL
1
<*■*
°’9
k°^o4
5
J
rt:«0
l
l
0 '<)
oh
^oisos to 125 )
S
D
Of.HO
/
l
1
a ft
Of
h»5<<“i €0 12?
0
-Cl.hfl
/
1
a "e
QO
Cosio^ ioi 257
£
O
t° 40
-t l
>
i
%
X
V
//
o-oi
o 4
ffnani TToiZO
P'iT-i
s
3
t>‘iO
hi l«|Ql
)t
n
I
a
A
D
*
f
r
1
r
s
t
;
5
i
1
1
3
)
’
l
o
l
t
*
B
>
»
j
/>
5
5
---
[l»j |»un»(>]
ijidaaawoi
[« |lUI1Mp]
lOdaa »ddn
xu«s »(duns
xuoth
>*isodiuo3
0-<|W0
au»x
U01W9II03
a»«a
ai afdujBS
on SSI
i
m
•7
M
sr
Lwfojj JhjiDuj ]«i»ds
tlHXIJ VMUJUO^
ooic-sa(i8t)
»LL»*a J «uX W 9UJ1S U 9 (OAJ
Z90Z0 V
snusAy)[
*30| ‘lOU/IUU
w ‘POO.IAJON
<pop>™A 6K
oj|ad 3039 V73
Pl'»a uo8tu»^ pafojj V7Q
5
omsum* : oNP»fcu«i
*00^ "3
ON
«A
3|q(J3\]|3(] DIUOPSI J
»Mio acxi aoa aOMa-rN aoM-xa gpivvK >
(»|3j;3 as»j|d) :2giM0||0j jqi jo Xu» joj pa food iiqj t]
t"S3a * B!“Ml Sufuodjy
obl~o! hi
ai xoaroMd avn ssa
■lamp 3K AN fN UN 13 n(vl^:p3P3||CP »JJ* t3|duncs auqM»igis
' paAoiddy qsna pjgpug»s~^C omu
AQOlSnD JO MIVH3
U)03'Xj01EJOqe|SS9'MA\M
98«'-l9tc(I0>) 18UM9fr(l0fr) Pl
II3C-0I6Z0 iy *uojsubj 3 ‘anusAy ssdubjj $81
•51// ■SutAWJtSuj l{3SJ3fHl/o UOtSIMQ
XjOJBJOqBq SS3
Page 31 of31 Page 1 of 31
a.
&
vO
2 #
o
rf
5 *
©
Qv
v>
x
O
■M
CC
o
^3
cs
.5 *>
J .$
!
-C ^
II
4%
<
pa
£
o
I
J
0
1
u
0
1
+->
t
a
43
•-
c
<.
43
■5
cd
-i
J
£
CD
0
$
CD
.3
S
w
E
i 5
52
£
»>4
S
5
<
E
OS
Uj
U
_' o-
2 y
§ 2
E *
—
J
< "
o 2
it
« 2
z o.
u o
3
o
— -O
s t
H
0.
a
U
a
—
a
a
a
S
<
V5
o
•8
in
g
£
•*T
J
O
8
I |
tg Q.
3
£ §
o 00 3
.2 I e
J3 2 5
o c
T* «-•
c/3 «
C/3 .£>
UJ o
s f 1
Iff
E 5
* 1
o
O
2
|
= 1
<D
.2 to
a. —
o "
fcis
-
u
2
8
E
500000000000000009999
■^.vOvOvOvOvOvO'vO'O’OvOvOvOvO'OvOvO'vDvO'OvO
*2 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000
5c/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3C/3
4» 00 O <N
4, C/3 C/3 C/3
“oS s s
i N N N
« o o o
Tt vO CO O fN
O O O — —
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
0000 —
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
v* vri «/■> *n *r>
OOOOO
ri tj- so 00 o <n n
o o o o — — o
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
— m */"> O' — —
0 0 0 0 0 — 0
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
r- r~- r- r- f" t" o
000000 —
S sO 00 O <N
O O — —
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
0000 —
C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3 C/3
OOOOO
N N N N N
oooaa
N N N N N N N
^2
N N N N N
OOOOO
I 8
31
£
p
J^.rsiroTS-vrisor-ooo'O — <Sf^^T«^voc > 'Ooa'0
gOOOOOOOOO — — — — — — — — — — c^*
SavO'O'O'O'O'avO'O'O'O'O'O'OO'Ovoo'O'gv
7f~r v -f'r v f N i s, f s -t K I s - t— r— r-' t-' t - '- r 1 r~~
^00000000000000000000
u
o
•M
cd
t-
O
U5
cd
J
hJ
<1
PQ
J
11
<3 E
!|
•ft ^
£ -s
M -s
* I
ii -5
Co
w
X o
< £
5 —
e
S
£
e:
C UJ
o §
3 |
< *
Ss
E
« 2
Z a.
U U
f
o
I
E
-
o
u.
«
9
IB
r
u
"o
L
O
8
CL
15
'U
15
c
<
Qm
w
Q
cn
</5
ee
s
~
Q
<
•C
Q
5 8
— 0 )
s
o
C
15
2
UJ
Q
§
2
<
>< ^
I >
i <
S CJ
X
CL
>
CL
UJ
Q
i
*
O 00
n> 31
-O _
^ r- CD
1| =
A ? 5
o -S
u
22
0.
s
<
u
g.
X
o <
H U
O
o
>
I
u
t/5
0 w.
U
X
Oi
CO
0.5
1<
X
>
UJ g
H >
VO
O'
2
° 1
2 2
u
PO <
00 U
8 3
a> u
X >
5 <
oo U
UJ
UJ ®
Q >
<s> —.
g ?
5 5
S £ &
i
2
q
&
•5
5
I
o
s» -t
*c
I
II
s
E
~ oo
c
-3
cl s:
Q
' "O
\ £ 2
f <
} g u
er "CJ
-E <U
; ■£ O
>
2
<
u
CO
u <
a. >
3 p
3 . -C
«t u
*■■ a>
I f
k. o
■s “
oc X)
3 'C
© L»
^ <U
Ii
5r
©
C o
6 u
& s
£ u
JH O'
»- *T3
o S
2 «3
<u T>
C o
ca
1 a
■3 .£ 13
5 «
_ 2 w
I
1
a> <
2 5
9- ~
E -S
d a)
00 ^
1 -E 13
' ”3 \3
L O >•
c 13
: r §
« »
& ■s
2
<
u
> a>
”S
N M
■€' .£
s ■§
^ «S
a>
J3 g
g* &
a. 42
1 S
§ E
- a>
I
o o
Z Z
>• >•
13 p2
— ca
> «
2 E
<■ c3
CJ s
<u >.
51
-S -5
% f
o 5
■S -a
<U “
E v
C DC
s 1
op g
■a
§
E § §■£
ESlt
a - o o
- = §
"3 ^
11
s 3
to - “
' I o
•a -S § Z
o«u =
> ^
O C
S a
t .’S
O —
0 13
H 3
1 I
X |
CL C
< 13
Z' o ■ t
c o -c
Sei
■§ f -1
■£ ^ a
« < >
^ W ■=
0 2 - g 5 5 -
_ O <U rs,
_ 0)
•a E
•S ^
^
. ^ <2 £ .1
> a
= t
•a -9
Q <
s
>
- <S
o o
Z Z
8 ~
I
9
£ <
r 1
13
i
5 *
ii
O 3
o. S
2 -i
c3 UJ
I "Ii
u -t:
I <
^ 0 -S
.0 T)
I?
L —r tv
3 S x =f
3- a) « Li
SiS?
S -S g £
III!
^5 o ^ ^
E 5
i ^
a 8
5 * S
<* >
2
*3
S E
a: =
| S I I
■5 E ; «0
ii u ^ ^
^ _
3 2
o*< S
a y |
S -a “
Q.
O- ^
O <
= T3
O 9
cd o
«« 13
— C/J
S ^
2 ~
o c
o o
9 - i
<L >■
> ^
■5
*3
2 rg
CL -O
a>
< o
U ^
a> ST
rS
c —
« >.
<5 13
8 §
D
?U -SJ
g (O «
. g
05 O -s
ll
o a
I i
§>i
E
0> M
^ 3
S 3
> Q
*g B
1 i
S <u 0>
III
§ S 1
II
C 1
S §
-c ^
vf
11
Ii
H
§
»
•«
1
s
b
2
9
a
-3
L
E
«
s
3
II
§-.a
•8 I
8 6-
f i
15
*-
« 5
§ I
5
“5;
53 3
IS ■?
■5 Op
i«
l
ii i
i
8-
3 ^
_r-
1,5 5
5 .2
3 5
3 *
^■5 I-
^ 2
*8
*«
I
- ^
-|c ^
"s s
§ J
^ 'S
ii
2 z
£ ~o
11
CO
c<3
Q.
1 s
VC >
T S
— CC
£■
■5
5
s
U
«, S
u
o
■M
cd
L
o
U3
e8
h-3
CQ
•S ^
II
ii
!!
*s
a5
S2
e:
2 ;
K
s
_- 0 .
a o
£ 2
E J.
I I
5 >
= UJ
6 ^
<
oS
« 2
z £
1 1
C 0
8
00
5
2 -2
CL
U
o
E
ce
—z
1
z
0
■B
5>
cd
0
0
00
s
3
u_
0
H
O
-x
U
c:
a
B
UJ
Q
£
Q
£
z
1
X
UJ
c
0
2
I—
T3
2
H
-a
CL
t
O
Cfl
BS
T3
C
cd
in
2
-C
S,
n
c
_a>
"a
i
3
UJ
UJ
J5
jS
Q
M
c
a
cd
a>
fi
cd
V
cd
H
cd
U
CL
a*
cS
ra
3
Um
’3
JC
x
X
0
M
£P
•O
B
1
2
>
>
M
U
CA
u
3
CL
U
>
ed
B
V
T"
c
o-
J
X
c
C/D
t/9
1
UJ
U
J3
S
9
CL
tA
X
x
CL
CA
9
cd
V
99
in
in
UJ
u
0
u
T3
C
JX
L
§
9
cr
<
|
3
cr
<
■T3
O
C/3
—
-3
O
O)
15
|
0
m
•0
3
cr
J
3
9
B
9
2
3
E
c
3
i
p
u
9
CA
1
§
=3
cr
<
§
3
cr
<
9
CL
T3
"O
0
s
•
•
1
1
%
<
2
C/)
o
C—V
a
<u
<
Vi
<
O
CQ
~
<
bi
vO
<
O
CQ
O
*r»
X
H
u
vO
»
00
I
St
(«
H
Z
Ua
X
SC
c
<
00
cd
CL
£
I 8
2 i
1
5
|2 .£■
*nI q
«N
o
u
I
O' O'
o o
3 3
&
S-
O
4->
Sm
O
J3
03
«!
PQ
d
e ^
.0 **
.5 £
1}
^ 1
V, 5
fi S?
O' —
r- o
2 S
O _2>
co co
CO CO
W LD
1 5
CO CO .
r x £
S t ed
2 « =*
O ^ M
-O ^ c
eo _U c
^ g- 0
S i=
o D
ez
■*■*
zj
e2
« *
§1- -
E
-I
y y
s i
-i
a
Si
V2
s
-2
s
?c
c:
§3
Cj
_* o-
3 U
c s
u '
E ; 2
I i
tU
c
I
<
o 9
o
*T)
©
>, N
£ o
I S’ E
Z ft. CO
c c c
4> 4) 4>
u G u
a. o
E co
co •*-
1/5 s
a> o
co <u
Q cl
CQ
o
X
w
'O CN
O' O'
<N ir.
IN
9;
»h c si
O I ^
cd
•-
o
J2
CO
^ C
It
j s-S
js 5
hJ ^
<1
PQ
II S ^
S' £ x -a
!! ■§£
^ ^ 2 «
3 3* *
co co E -
CO CO rt C
CD LD CO D
ec
"3
e2
oh
y y
§ s
ji
a
S|
a
Co
*-3
*
K
rZ
s
c V
o E
-- <5
> >
c til
LD c
SI
SE
11
§ 2
z &;
00
o
£ f"
£ r»
o
CO ©
■'f —
© ^
N <N
o 5 «
2 ~
111
i t &
lal
*= « £
U O ft.
g
•g
B
§
X
ID
* 2
ae >c
it
s ■«
r ■
< J5
185 Frances Avenue Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax. 401-461-4486 http /Aunt I SSI nboralorv com 185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RJ 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hup «y>» _ F,SSI.alx'ralorv . co m
Dependability . Quality . Service Dependability • Quality • Service
Page 6 of31 Page 7 of31
g§ s
as 2
Sh
o
+->
re
u
o
-Q
re
pq
:s.?
5 s
H
|f
^ =
2 £
2 ^
o *>
co co
& *
♦2 a U. OO
2 2 rt ^
o O *5 oo
£ £ 4 c
re re <u c
J J a «
CO co g -■=
CO CO <73 J~
LU UJ CO D
r CL.
i S
i ^
• rr
! £J °
i a> co ©
: ® o J
co ^
—
o ^r
= w
o 9
— ^
5 00
o
® 8 Q. ® 5
E zp E o
« 2 re E co
Z cl. co re —
+- — *- co c
8 I I « §
U U U Q cl
3
5
e2
a-
L. -
O -I ^
re
Fh
o
L3
re
r *
li
-o ^
(8 -i
js £
£ >
<
PQ
2 £
Tt —«
O jjj
I 1
CO CO
II
O y
X) 4;
&
T3
00
>§
BO
E
o
3 3 i ..
co CO P -
CO co re dE
W W co D
5
_r Cl.
3 O
2 2
© tT
c —
^ N oo
S o 5 «
a 9
E
re
Z
a. .
E
— — « o
U O O a.
cc
"8
5
£
CQ
o
1
-c
3
2
a
-i
c
7\
^1 — N
c-i ci
a »
s s
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http /Aum I SSl.ahuratorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http 'wwu.l-.SSFnl>cn»twr\ corn
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 8 of 31 Page 9 of 31
c
u
c
—r ft-
3 y
s s
C I 00
c C °
o « £ r-
- o> o *"•
| w ^ 2
^ c — —
<
a S
»s
, ^
a
o -
z ft.
w o>
C G
[/■>
5
o
CD
o
1/1
o
r*1
*b
c
8
2
H§
as
a
s g
4.
«/i
c
O J>
j* ft.
-o S o
> c/3
6“
w ea ^
^ P CO
2
| |
J 3
C/3 C/3
uo to _
UJ W C/3
£*
-o
0Q
E
| I
o
c
CL
s
O
8
o* _
c/: ^
>> PS 00
<
g s
1 1
« 2
Z a.
1 1
— — — fO o
U U • --
S ~
III
% 15
c/3 ta —
- c/3 c
1
U Q
C/3
W
o
t2
CD
B
«/i
O
r*i
■g
-c
o
2
c
c
8
«s
to
L! Li
U U
a§ §
a:
5 5
ol
a
-I
1J i
-r
to
o
©
2
U
<
u
a
o
o
00
<«
ft.
o
*/l
s §
1 I
2 3
u u
II § §
g;
x
Sh
O
40
CC
Sh
o
rQ
CC
J
hJ
<1
PQ
.c --
11
H
3 J
•c ^
£ *P
11
* <
u if
— o
2 5
111
t £ X -O
2 2 c oo
o o ^
x; xi ^
J J 1
E
C/2 C/2 = ^
& C/2 kV
UJ UJ C/2 D
5
0/
2
e2
q|-
E
' 3 \
8 8
C<3
o
£
7C
u
r-1
ps
8
—' 0u
3 O
c *>
<U ^
E ' 2
O « t/3 m
.i: 5 ^ n
1“ s ~
O
^ TT
a a -
•*- 4> "O
o — X
E
« r-
Z CL
4> £■ — U=
c3 E C/2
2 0
~ -p '-p <5 <D
O CL
4> .2
U U
M
o
+->
cC
o
o
U3
c«
J
J
<1
CQ
■S «
I >
9 l
!}
S|
5
R
K
S'
r- on
2 £
tt »r
fi jMk
*H 2
o .«
■s t-
5 1 5
(S on on
£ & X
2 2 p
2 2 «
£ 2 s
J5 J i
E
t
T3
00
§>
E
on on ='
m « „ _
UJ w on D
>, N
£ o
a s
If
o c
w. a
a. c/2
IT ro
§
all
i £5
— — — C/2
s | j _
0 0 0(3
re
—
£
§
■8
u:
I
s
c
o
§
s
X
UJ
d§ §
IN
IN
E
x|
e e
8 8
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 http //uwu TSSlaburatorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hup \\\\\\ l.SSl^ilvnator\ com
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 12 of 31 Page 13 of31
u
111 1
31
>^
u
o
4->
c«
Sh
O
pQ
C 8
<
PQ
.1
I!
11
•c ^
II
O'
t"- o
2 o
2 : ^
o
E •=
t £ *
o o • —
cr
TD
i: oo
o o *>
-O -O ^
3 3 1
E
a «g
on c/5
C/5 C/5
W UJ
C/5 D
cc
£
e 2
e e
a-
8 8
5
7 :
O
£
as
8
_- B.
a o
5 2
§ S
•i= fc
> >
C UJ
m
o "
&
< ^
o 9
C/5 —
r- —
O Tt
S I
Ci 2
<u td 43
E •=>
§ 2
Z CL.
jd
2 - o
E «3
rt ■*-
*> g
0 ) o
— — — eo ai
u U U O Q.
Ill 1
m 3
SM
o
+J
c«
s-t
o
X
ee
<1
m
•8
1 1
«I
II
ll
51
O J>
•£ |-
5 5 5
> C/5 C/5
£ £ a
sag
2 2m
5 J 2
C/5 C/5 P
C« C/5 *
UJ UJ C/5
ee
w
0/
f2
e e
y—
8 8
s i
-I
Q
a
i
8
g
ad
s
eu
U
2
• (N
c 0
« c/5
C/5 —
r- —
O TJ-
UJ
In
? o
QO-
i ii I
« O « O
— — « «>
u U O O.
CQ
o
1
S *®
< 3
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hmv/Avtm I SSI ahuratun coni 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http ■ Wt l . iSSUlx.int.iQ-jop t
Dependability . Quality ♦ Service Dependability . Quality . Service
Page 14 of 31 Page 15 of31
Ill I
■>1 fn w
3 ° °
■“"I r~^ rs
O s “r
■M :8 f
cd <3 5
^ fej
-J3
« 13
j n
jifi
^'s
<
PQ
-2 9
o ja
a §•_
5 1 O
> C/D </3
t x
2 2 c
8 2 J
J 2 S
J J 1
C/D C/5 c
C/D C/D
*T3
oo
<
a)
E
03 “
U U C/D D
CC
*-
0/
2
{2
7. ^
4> -
N x
< £ 5
oh
El
-I
_|
Q
1
§
£
?s
—' CL
<3 U
C O
22 £
te ^ n
c uj
o ..
c/d —
r- —
£ .rt c/D —
r-
9 ^r
C — a—
I'On”
Q 9 2
i-ill
Z CL C/D
co E
o
C/D
~ C/D C
U U U Q
CQ
o
4)
2
II
SI!
sc u
u u
8 8
u
O
+->
cd
u
O
ja
cd
J
■s .
S-|
«5
<
—
| I 5
> «l t«
&• & X
i£S|
3 J 3 1 J
C/D C/D £ tf
C/D C/D 5 =
UJ UJ (/D D
ec
—
4/
f2
e «
ol~
E
21
a a
8 S
-
21
g
s
g.
B
a;
5
CL.
u
2
• s
1 > cc N
h f S
&
>
ui
c
>, N
* m
S H
C/D —
—
O tt
>. rs m
Q Q -
•g.3 -8
w E £• o
jr 5 E t/5
0- C/D ca —
1 1 » I
C U (5 D.
5
ca
o
1
J=
B
5
c
o
5
<0
tJ
X
Hi
8 f
185 trances Avenue, Cnuulon. RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fix 401-461-44X6 hll|v.W» I SSI ah.>ralury 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 l ,m- »»« lssl.alx.inu,ti cm
Dependability . Quality • Service Dependability . Quality . Service
Page 16 of31 Page 17 of31
c
6
c
E
eO
Z
c
u u u
Q Cl
5
Q
S
j2
CQ
o
*/i
O
m
-o
c
2
c
o
o
_c| c c
31 3
»8 8
!l§ §
a= a
5 Q
« *
U5 ^
a- -
a s
§ 1
2 £
o
VI
oc
PQ
_• a.
« O
S 5
e;°
§ « -
•5 5> S
= jS =
s
<
a
11
Z a.
u o
N ~~ r~
05 “
O S 2
i ti I
S“ I
1/3 (0 —
— C/3 £
§ « 8
0 a £
«
c5
s
f2
CQ
Q
*/^
G
■8
2
O
as
* «
ah
E
j|
5
o
<0 •
U.
£•
>C
2 .
o
II
g;
8 8
u
o
+J
a
u
o
rQ
CC
h-5
11
? s
11
.0 J
•c ^
II
* -Jl
S •»
PQ
O jy
§ 1
c/5 C/3
& & X
o o •—
2 2 §
-O X) ^
•3 -3£ a
S 58 I I
W UJ 75 D
cr
ID
00
M)
E
a
o
s
j2
e e
si-
8 8
8 8
g
Co
X
<3
§
tt,
o
a
u
p=
s
• a.
D
2
3
<
3 s
it
5 rv
Tf
O
c/3
ro ^
s
O ~
Z2 t3 ’
* N ^ «o
O ^ oo
Q -
e e- *3
Z CL C/3
oi a>
U U
' ■ ^ U O cl
CD
o
14
f i
||
•c «3
n
s I
^ s
K *
<
PQ
x,
I
K
B
<
§ 1
C/3 C/3
& t
E
1 a. ui
C/3 C/3 P -1=
C/3 C/3 « C
U U (/3 D
SS„
t & n •r
<S> <-*
O ™
C — T
>. N ~
S o 5
Q S 2
i is
II i -
fl- C/3 to
w — C/3
S S s
o C a
ec
c3
"«
S
02
O
■8
-c
S
2
l|i §
C M
■"I «N <N
8 8
8 8
ji
i ?
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston. K1 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hill* -'As»w I SSI aNiralors com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, Rl 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 Into »»» t.SM.nho.. com
Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Dependability 4 Quality 4 Service
Page 20 of 31 Page 21 of 31
a °
o
+J
c«
'M
o
-Q
ee
hJ
<1
CQ
.0
• 8 .#
^ c
li
•2 lS
ii
5 i
E >2
£
I
O' •—
r~ O'
o £-
•S 9
O 22
■a |-
IJ? 5
£ £ * £
2 2 c oo
« 2 « -*
o o oc
«o x> ^ c
B B O c
►-J j Q. yj
c/3 c/3 E e
W t/5 a C
UJ LU c/3 D
CL
u
s
o 2
00
o
C/3 i/~)
£r ^
c$
<
N
o
, N
o
Q 9 -
ts -|_-g -3
QJ t-L _ ■ —
•—i E 0-0
S « E «
CU C/3 eo *-
C C C ax «<
0 > 43 O - 2 ; O
'.E -E _E A gj
(j U O Q cl
o
s
t2
CQ
o
5 5
a-
u, u
u u
8 8
O' O'
o o
IN IN
Sh
C
+J
ce
O
-Q
RJ
h-3
<1
03
4 {
If
«I
11
•2 a
«* ^
II
^ -2
— O
2 5
O 22
! I §
"> C/3 C/3
£ £ *
2 2 p
2 2 ^
334
V3 C4 £ -
C/3 C/3 £ C
U 111 C/3 J
CC
”8
t 2
N ^ S
'C' wi
5 5
a-
^ a
8 8
-I
Q
~l
1
■ CL
(J
s
2 I
£
J*
s
CJ
O 4)
k- tr
£ 2
55 <*>
W c -
J g.5 S
<3 ~
go
it
« S
Z a.
O O
N
o Q
Q ~
ill
i i&
C/3 ea ^
— C/3 C
J 2 §
U D al
CQ
o
*
o
«
E
X
UJ
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hltn.Vmra I SSI uhimUorv .com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http '»« ISSI.iiN'iiil.in con j
Dependability • Quality . Service Dependability . Quality . Service
Page 22 of 31 Page 23 of 31
u
O
+->
cC
Sh
O
X
cd
m
.0
11
H
.c c
•c ^
Jl
* -is
x
ti,
o
S
I
as
£1
$ $
-o U
O J>
I 1
C/3 C/3
&
C
o o ^
X> ^
« « 4J
J J Q.
C/3 C/3
C/3 C/3 „
uJ UJ c/o
00
E
E •«
^ c
$ 5
* *
§1- -
El
j|
cc
■w
C/
s
5
r o
8 8
§ 8
— - o-
3 U
c
D <-•
E ' _
eg-
C/3 Tf
— rf
55 **>
o —
— Tj-
Q S
« 2
Z ft.
u .2
u u
o. «
E &
CO E
C/3 rt
— C/3
g »
C/3
C
o
_ o
" ” U Q Cu
CQ
o
15
2
i 3
< J
00
CO
ft.
-L 8
s - s
2 £
o
2 .
r-
-J|
£ £
1
S3
p '§
Q
§|
T3
_ 8.
<N (5
u
3
PQ
o
c
ft.
3 U
g 2
E
c
>
B
UJ
o
1 jg ^
B g w
iii§:
| Is i
w > n r
^ n
goal
*Sf|f
o' §
Z £ C/3
E C/3
g g
_ C/3
s *
U U U O ft.
£
o
a§ §
a-
ah
sc
p
cc
r
1
M
1
2
B
o
8
> A
11
< < -
1
2 8
NO >
2 J
£■
u
v
3
g
•$
v>
M
o
"M
cC i
o
X
CS
<1
P3
.y ^
i £
f. i?
£
e-
J
co
S
*j
§
£
5
k,
R
?s
G
—- 0 -
2 y
ai
< ^
o S
it
§ 2
Z CL.
3 C
0 > O
U U
*
C 3
O c/3
Cl <—
on ~
x E
_3 O
« ro
o 2
]* 5
g ON
S o
« J*
oo -5
2 o
c
« o O o
-O c c ro
i.s|Ss
2 C<3 w 0)
S I I g
Ti P- P“ C
11
le
E
J
on
c
€
o
o
1 2
Z' •o
«J 3
C C
<u o
o o
5 ®
c/3 c/3
<U <U
T3 TD
3 3
^ ^ ^ n
Q cC
no c -g
o o
X X
O V
■8
13 55 «
Q <
22 >
I" -2
crt (2
E
_ ja
•o -a o o -2 > ”
° ° Z Z B
•£ *5 ‘3 '3 <D
<u o E E ._
S S J J Q J5
2 X X X O <
O 3 3 3 Q. <U —
>
2 «
c
u-
o «
o on
X) c
c/i cj roc
4> O 3= 1> *3 O
op op 3 a; go
C 3 c/3 _ •— X)
ro ro o o roc
aC oC ot: z o «
J ^DO .
OO J> £
»-)•-] Q — u- xz —
N m <!
o
a, < ffl
S o - 1
Z wt/l
Lh
O
+J
ro
«-i
o
x
ro
X
<1
CQ
||
i!
* i
i
&
o
1
J3
2
ro
D
c
o
u
ro
3
O'
to
5
X
a
3
a:
_' CL
2 O
c 5
>
w
< ^
o 2
it
£ £
Z CL
O o
i I
Sr! a
cx £
# 5
8 «
II
s
s %
If
8 g
2 S
8 a
§ § 8 8
§ 8 8 8
ia x
ii ii ii
4/
3 I
3 I
3 !
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston. R1 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 Inin Hwww I SSI aloramr' enm 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http »»» IXSI.ulxmitur' com
Dependability • Quality • Service Dependability * Quality • Service
Page 26 of 31 Page 27 of 31
9 V
VOA-A »|U31S-S ««IO uquiv-ov ««I!>0 -9»a-d
w
V 9V
UV
uv
m-A
-M-
-4-
~+
—H
—r
1
*H
-6 -PV02-8 P!’V wqjosy-i HO=W-S HO»N-f ‘CONH-» 'tOS3H-t IOH‘7 'dN't *I»D oopiAMray
\
b
4
o-r i
o-oi
v/s //c
^..
O
Wl*€l
/
cz
(
k
>4
/
0*01
Q«
ots&osoijz^
?
ss*ti
U
ft
x
X
1
o\®
o-9
*50$ £06 01)2-5)
1
sr:£i
V/
7
X
l
o-i
Oh
109 Sos 0 7(25?
>
D
S'ti)
L/
to
X
1
0 • h
/ *'*
hoes os <7l/25>
s
Z)
is:ri
*)!
j
l
J
X
~r
q-q
rosios oil 25?
s
9
‘is^l
S/
j
T
X
i
°'C\
6-oi
ylsns-to/25^
9
h>
/f
*
i
0-Q|
fl'Ji
oisbv^-tO) 2 < 5 >
9
it:ll
?/
l
j
o.e
o ^
j§o?ios4.0(2^)
9
sr-.n
5
IH
$
¥
X
i/
O-f
Oh
losSQSto/^
s
0
rt-u
II
Comment #
o ■
!
.
I
)
|
!
1
1
<
<
I
1
>
!
i
<
i
■
B
!
0
:
k
4
t»«mucojo#
[paj jButioap]
qidan PMCn
(« (5UII33P)
aiu^N aidws
XU T*W
>ai|soduio3
D-^ejO
3UII1
uon»i|OD
area
ai
q»i ssa
£
•7
M
C*
Supp 4 pafojj SunLy [Bisads
8U131JJ PttOUOO
004£-833(l8i)
UU9«3 aotAA :>nn wfoy
39030 V
4T1U3AV I]
*30] ‘leinjwu
‘pooMJorq
iqtspuBA 6f3
0i|A03043 VZO
P|abq :j38nunpq psfojj VZO
OriKIilO'IO ONPafaij
JQd SS333V JTissxh :jeuuoj
"0|sj %3\ 3|qEJ3A[pa SIU0133|3
-J31P0 aoa dOH d&Ma-fN d3M-13
(apjp 3st3|d) :au|MQ[|oj aip jo Xue joj p3fold s|m s|
<»IEB3K’iS
C'SDM * * l ! u, n Suiyodsy
IbLO/h/
ai loarotid avn ssa
~J»mO 3K AN fK HM 13 |^vl^:paixi|l03 8 Wm S3|dures ajaqM wcis
'" :Xg pjAaiddy qsn» pjcptreis X ~
3UIJX iuni
AaoisnD dO NIVHD
U10D'Xl0lBJ0tlt|SSaMA\M
98fr*-l9fr(lO*-)x«J 18iz.-19t^ (lOfr) I3J.
1132-01630 18 ‘uoisuBJO ‘snuoAy soouwj J 8 I
ouj ‘8uu33ui8ug ipspnufo uois>aiq
itiojiuoqin SS3
Mi
aded
'3ai)|jM U] Xpoisnp jo n|»qo o» »5u«q31|» l!»m-3 as»4|j
I r
1 %gl
O jfrm&s) «g p»Aj>oyj
(•jnmjQ*s> Xq pt/unbuwb
(•rrmAs) An p»gt>rt>UH>>j
V*/0/
•uiijwa
/,£)'j-f' '" 0 }°b :3J”iwadui3XJ5|QOO
:VN' ON^ ^ s*A »^ U I S ! E »S
ON lUJMJd .131003
KdjM-AV IKK)"»«/» * u !’tu! J a-Ma J»i*»ipis-*S miMpunaip-y^r) i3i>»a]CT^i\-AVArJ*P n IS-q PHPS-as IK’S-S H'JHIA
_ p» p »BB J ! a y pw qj tin JJ, »4 :siu3uiuioq
\ sv< 1 £- :Xqp3[dures
(W9V3V9V9V9V9W0V9V
VOA-A »|UWS S 5^10 Jaqurv-OV K0|D-O <|Od-d *K.L uumuioj
an-
T3VU7-I T>«V 3!<**KV-i ’H03W-9 HO»N-S 'tONH-» 'WSm-t '131W 'JN-1 »P°3 uoilHAJMaid
°-h
op
W.osio<; -to/-2.9
Tf«<J04-toy-29
A'
cJ
X
o-c
O-Q
io.\\
if-bi
on
o- 0 /
vt s jis?oy29
O 0 I
oisyx^^oi^
jgos tosSo /29
C^ihl
L
~W
0-4
otj
~°T
109 Sag soH9
f.os-jos So /
Sl-M
"CfT^T
°-h
~o 7 r
b
o r
0^0
-COS' °S$0/2?
oigtos hol'Zj
to-by
o-oi
TT3T
09:01
h(\ li\cu
U
O -S
■5T
TosTosfJo 727
tt-Q\
y.
(psy |cuit»p]
qidaci -OMOl
(y pruitaap)
ipdaq iaddn
OWN >I<^S
»in»w
>ai»sodujo 3
0U111
uoips [|03
QI »|danrs
dn SS3
lvpp4 pafojj tuniij piMd$
Suou,i URUU 03
«oX w OWN Pofojj
01 IWIilO lO °N P^QJd
00i£-823(18i)
39030 VW ‘poo«jON
snusAV JuqjapiniA 6>3
•3«| *i»>naiuuoj|A03033 y^o
too*-] -3 p|A*a :ja 8 eirej\ pDfoij VZO
■mO O
°N
dad SS43DV |33X3 :jBUU0d
ss^ siqeJSAjpa oiuo»3|3
jaw aoa dOM d08a-fN doa-xo
(spjp 3SB3|d) :8aiMQ||oj sip jo Xub joj paf(ud siq» S|
<»ITB3VI'
3 -S 3 M * Suiyodsa
I bLo/hl
ai iiaroMd e\n ssa
J 3 qiQ 31V AN rid HK 1 U n^vj^:p 3 P 3||03 ai 3 A\ 53 |dm« 3 J 3 qA\ awns
" :Xg paAOjddv"
qsny pxppirejs
auni ^» n l
AQOlSnD JO NIVH3
tU03 - /ClOJEJOqeiSS3-AAAVM
98»-W9t'(l0t)XBi 1814*19^(10^) I»1
1133-01630 IH ‘uojsireo ‘snusAy saDinuj $81
•31!J •8uU33Ul8uj IfOSpiUlp UOfSIMQ
XjOJBJOqBl SS3
Page 30 of 31 I Page 31 of 31
o
■M
-
o
X
c«
h -5
<1
CQ
c 5
.o
■! .$
if
14
£ t
C X
X
uj
0
>5
Li
o
|
■L
4 j
cd
-
.g
L
1
o
t§
^0
*>.
cd
■s
1
Co
Dl
6
CL
H-l
8
§
x
3 U
s s
in
"5
s
L
O
1 s
in
.0
-3
K
— 41
> >
c UJ
W
=3
UJ C
II
< ^
o G
Z a.
1
t/>
3
u
u
H
a.
u
U
-
cc
Ed
J
Cu
£
<
CZ
E
4>
>
o
Z
-a y
c ^
« ■<
<J
43
c —
4 > —
E <
O' <j>
O c
4)
D
— X
I |
X Q,
s
S E
o -n
I 4 -
g
2 °
.3 ■£
cl
□
2
2 1
CL 1
E
3 4 >
| JS
42 «
c/> J
4) «2
't:
CL
— 41 VJ C
M I E 2
O -a
>
~a
V) U
3 >
O «>
3 ^
3- 3
? «
=P E
E o
c °
o
& •S
*• -3
o I
E t
o
£ » 5
■§ c
f S'
E E
4> V)
-C -n
h-
>* 4)
g ie
E 8
-o 5
* 5 2
s * &
4
™ >. "O
t 2 fT c
5 O cd
g Jd
3 «f
a. oo £
& S -2
■8
8
o
4> 5
- I
3 X
i ■= x
2 5
>% <u cd
o ° E
<u 2 «
« 3 E
•S 1 =5
Cl «_
3 C .O
D i
■*= <
•o O
l >
£ u
Q. 4)
V)
B
c x:
3 I
so
S' -5
|1
3= | 1
III
E
2
e
S
i!
~ g "° S
5 5 ~ a
o' ^
O 41 |
jo 4> o
3-0 1/1
oo a>
2? « a-
E
* o
3
c
CL ^
LU <
u
cr
t
a.
U
£
"uuuuuuuucjuuuuucjuuuou
■500000000000000000000
Eoooooooooooooooooooo
^,0'0'0'0'00\0\0'0'0'0'0'0'0'C'0'0'0^^
41 <N
E 0
g <"
Z o
u C/3
P
5 N
XX o
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ro«or^O' — — fO */"i
0000-000
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
O-O'O'O'OOOMOC
00000000
NNNNNNNNO
00000000
>w w _
OO C/3 § ~
OO OO ^ ^
s s
C/D C/D
•n so
_ — o o
S S 55
Os Os
00 O <N
O — —
XXX
o S -
XXX
N N
O
CO X X X u .. .. --
OOOOO'O-^^O'O'OS
OOOOj^f^OOO
nnnnOOnnn
a a a 0 000
X— <Nm-<i-«/->sor-ooo'0 — <Nr^Tr*/-,sor-oooso
■Sooooooooo — — — — — — — — — — CS|
_ O'O' O'O'O' O'O'OsO'O'OsO'OsOsO'O'O'O'O'O'
^NNNriNNriNNNNNMNfSNriNNN
ioooooooooooooooooooo
^t’Tttsr’Trr^t^l-^^t'T'TTrrTtTT
Fh
o
cd
(h
o
-C
~
hJ
CQ
?!
I
31
5
3
K
r*
<
o —
^ E
Q- U
u o
S -X
•
? ? .
* c
C L.
c o
^ "
•• C /5
U> /
2C ^
§ 3
ft- E
6
4 J X
2 u
~a 4) -a
C* O OJ
N C -t;
c 2 C
gj § g
CO
.s a <
ca
<
11
C/3 <
C/D Cl-
UJ LU
^ s
UJ
S3 S'
5 ^ 0
0 O' -o
•2 « S
S -5 s
S *0
^ 4> 4J
r - 1 o ^
^ s 3
w c
^ ^2 c
M = c
| R g,
« 8
2 CO
.S <fc
flj
id ■-
«0
c/i
c C/D so
" D ^
T3
N ^
>. .5 9
cd 00 ft*
5 I £
g ! L»
i!o
E ^
E/3
cd v.
J= 00 &
c ft-
4> r
> ^ 2
o o M
JO — V5
05 <2 I
d
00 .2
.£ €
I s
x>
L- ft
<2 ,
I'
£
3 </>
c
Cd k -
E a
cd
L-
^ 3
t/3 O
‘S O
J
'C
' £
8 f
■5 s
E «
< X
>>
•u
g
c o
cd E
(A
o V
-= 3
I - !
E
E
a
C/D
1 ^
.5, § 0
©■£«/»
6 -
22
I
E/3
o
T3 SO
g j
* =
■f
c H
C '
O 3
| s
u JS
—: —; -C
o _
if if
— -- »/ ™
< ^ e s:
Ji ce Id (!"
C E o
S aiiM
C/DC/D'"
o
i= *§
i? s
o
s m
° . I -8
io
in X
"P "S
cd C»
^ I
o
<
_i
u
z
1 ?
i
cd
ZL
z
CQ
C/D
*o
c
z=
c/f
u->
00
5 | 1
3 |
Q I
o
1 JS
-2
is ^
u
«
op E
C ed
a.
E
— — , c
s S:
a <
c 2
o
Cl
O 4/
U r<
Cl
iA 00
2
2 x
11
i s
S "cd od
w — 'C .H
5 ** 2 u
4j 4/
S =
B.fil s
g £
c S
O CL
1 i
a £
si
£ ^
;= O
I "5
j= Z
s £
— o
l «
6*1
< 73
■s s
1 l
I Q
a c/3
£
a. 32
| §
■3 JS
i ?
in S
185 Frances Avwue. Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 hup A\u\\ I SS| alxiralon com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http wwu l.SSI,nK»miur\ com
Depen dabilit> ♦ Quality ♦ Service IX*pendability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 1 of 31 Page 2 of 31
S-i
O
+j
S-H
o
cC
h-5
<
PQ
11
11
Jj J
-c ^
II
i £
K "S 5
iM
to
a
i
O
ta
f-.
X
oc
O
-r 0-
& U
e ^
o>
£ ■
c UJ
5
<
Ss
p ^
£ °
Z a.
c c
4> O
u u
1 I
■•S 00
to jr
« Q
-•* C/D g
Q 2 —
8 fl. S
c y 2P
1 I
2 tf
2 fcd
X)
CO N_
J <"
C/D O
“ 3
o
a
o
=
H
Ed
2
VO
S
00
se
m
H
Z
Ed
s
s
S E
p 2
p p
E S 2 5
R fa ■“ o
^ 2 E
»
UJ
c -o <D J=
3 P "P X
b. 2. -S o
o«
f d ” "g
cr a- o
O ^
--. c 0
A. X
& £
•o "2 S '3 c
• 7 ; 9- «
H H
TJ "O CL
4> <D H
OO OO T3
_2 a. a.
2 a> a> cl.
2
a
< < C/3 C/D
< < CD <
«/■> o o o _ _
O <N V> vO — <N
O O O O *T) w-» *n
m m c*"> m m m m
« y a -
I s
• <
vO O
o* .ii
< o
v> *n
B
8 2
co x:
£ o
& 1
2 1
in 9
in
3 y
O ^
5 2
6 s 2 §■
y 6 s <
< o
O O
< CQ
o —
o o — ^ ^ o o
'O h h h h 00 CO
CD < 2 < CD
— <N O — O
00 00 O «/"> vO
O o — — <N
00 00 00 00 00
hJ
*
o
J
<
o
>
C/D
■s 2
t
_ o
X u
U $
X
s
>
X
u. a.
<D UJ
o
3 ”2
O- c
>» 3 < CO
(J C/D •
• • u
Tr 00 O
— m •*■ rf
0000
O' O' On On
it o a c
Q < < < CQ
1 /-) o VO O */")
101 101 nO O'
OOOO
O' O' O' O'
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-4614486 hlln./Anv" .1 SSI,al»ralor\ com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel: 401461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http «\>w FSSLalxutitun com
Dependabilttv ♦ Quality • Service Dependability ♦ Quality • Service
Page 3 of 31 Page 4 of 31
u
O ■
■M '
c«
u
O
X5
c0
<1
CQ
5 £
11
i j
I
„ *
fN O'
O fN
— O
O «
Cl
I 5
r *
CO CO
GO
X) X) ^ _
"- 1 Q. C/5
W lO E •=
oo rt C
U U to D
||§ §
g*
si-
S
-I
2
«5
S
£
y
s
o
VD
I s
§ E
I &
£■
nr "■
= 5
3
2 .
t >5
£
S
£
s
t B.
O
s
N
O
S 55
“ o
"o' 1
r?l 1/5
ui w S -
o E 2 ■«■
X £ N
< £ °
N
O
3 00
Q- Q -
E
cO
Z t£
jj -o
o. «
E §•
a E
c/5 c<3
CQ
o
s
£
~ - - c/5 C
C C C «
0) (U <u ^ o
— — — CO fl>
U U U Q Qu
> .2
•I 4
11
t §
!|
15
<1
CQ
3
[2
o
CO
1
2
_* o-
2 O
c 2>
o ^
E •
II
—
3
go
si
S £
z £
1 1
u u
o
u.
c
.©
cc
•w
r
o
u
"o
o
a.
u
c
1/5
ce
UJ
Q
<
2
c
8
S
t
I
I
£
o
s
CL.
<
CL
ID
o
£
00
c
‘C
a
0 \ C
cst E
(/> CQ
a. >
1
E
>
a.
LD
Q
t/)
2
CO
*
o _
H X
x> —
>%
S S =
2 £ 5
ea -r <
IBs
Is?
“■ CN <
S * U
< ~
U w
'*■**
u
o
o
o
o
o
g n
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
^ X
/-N
/—V
.—,
•o —
&
»
s
w
6 1
JS
C/5
C/5
<u
JS
Hu
>•
>*
>•
>•
55 3 £
I
8 .
u
g m
•&<
1 <
I >
m ?
H >
« |
^ 5
£5 cj
oo U
§ u
<D O
I >
1
E
id
CL ro
UJ ®
Q ^
3 1
2 5
79
t u
S =
H 2
° ^
«**• u
8
> a
1/5 —
<N <
30 U
•9
Z <
2 =
£ 2
sd
o o
z z
a I
1
z z
t/5 C/5
£ S
CQ
O <
a- >
<N 5
30 3
o <
30 U
1
« Qi
S 3
I
I ^
$• 3
»j -a
5 §
-B
c,
s' 5
S.^
• 5 1
"a s
1 %•
c s
|.|
li
I s ^
6
3 &
•c C
il
41
§. -a
5 ^
S ^
Q B
| I
l I
s ^
51
■s 5
H
j
O 2
8
CL
ii
T
!« :
I i
!- >
c ?
i a
;l
TJ
I
I
c n
D
i
J
0 )
E
ro
Sil
I I =
^ <S) 0-
5
3
r v
f!
V©
2 .
§
5 .&
«N Q
<N
6
u u
III I
a*
O -s
c« ' “
f-t
o
43
eC
J ?S
J **
<1
CQ
8
#|
s«
ii
o j>
•« §•_
5 I O
I> C/3 W
£ £ X
o o —
-O 40
J 3
8 S «
_j
m « E -S
«« « c
M u vi 3
s
a
s
e2
oh
a a
S
§
g
y
ps
—- ft-
3 U
g s
E '
o £
- <u
> >
c uj
UJ "
O £
r °
5
< ^
o S
E ■"
§ 2
z
o .'.
C/3 rn
VO —
O tT
N ^ cs
OS*
Q -
® -d i?
o. « 1
<= o. o
E W5
C/3 «
*- ♦- C/3
u u
« o
— K3
U Q ft-
CO
o
1
2
II
II5
8 8
Sh
O
■M
c«
(-i
O
43
«
h-5
.© K<
11
? s
Ij
■s if
* I
Ji fi
K ■»
*<
CO
M O'
O <N
— O
cu **
-o a
O Ji
■s |-
5 I 5
> C/3 C/3
£ £ *
2 2 h
2 2 «
£ J8 ^
J J i
E
oo
00
E
C/3 C/3 e ^
C/3 C/3 w ^
UJ UJ C/3 D
■2
5
£
¥ «
^ *4
si- -
a a
§ §
_|
G
Pc
>■
X
k3
5
X
$
K
Pc
8
0.
y
5
x*
; w
o
W5 O
S °
t/3 ">
8
£. N
S o ^
a 9 “
o
00
E S'
_ — _ V)
O U
fe
e.
03
o
■8
8 =
8 2
1S5 Frances Avenue, Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htlii./Avuvv.) SSUilxiriitorv .com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 b l ttU "V " \ l ss ' ll| umitorvcom
Dependability . Quality . Service Dependability . Quality . Service
Page 7 of 31 Page 8 of31
!|i §
^1 'O *0
_| N «N
Jh
o
■M
cd
•-
O
-Q
cd
.©
11
11
•S ‘a
S 15
I 1
* I
JS s
s -S
<1
PQ
£ &
Mi
o o X
x> jo
J 3 2 1
E
C/D C/D c -
C/D C/D vv
U- ui c/] D
2
0 /
e2
£? Q
SI- -
a a
a
s|
§
£2
£
5
X
§
£
§
pc
8
-T Om
B U
§ « c/d
X “ P
5
<
N
O
C/D rn
'O —
o xr
>> N ^ so
^OS h
g 9 -
♦- a>
Z CL
Ji> TJ ^2
H .!> 12
Eg.o
cd £ C/D
C/D
a>
U U U O cl
O
cd
Sm
o
-Q
cd
h-J
.h
:S *
I ^
!;l
<1
PQ
o, s
fN O'
O _a>
c —
| I o
^ c/5 c/3
& & X
00
•5
00
E
C/D C/D £ t?
C/D C/D £ c
D W 7D 3
5 £ 2
J J -s
Gig
**3
X
,x
a.
□
s
s
s>
<= la S —
I
<
N.
o
o
t/> «
|
N
o
§
a 9 ~
| tl |
II e 5
0 . C/D od —
i B « |
U O Q fl-
eC
S
s
£
1
—
L
2
c
o
§
eo
E
X
UJ
Hi §
SIS 3
N_
a I
—I
a
SI
g a
s §
xis j
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 h» | vwnw I SSI aUnatorv coin 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 hltr> wwu l,SSl.aU>nHor\ com
I>ependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 9 of31 Page 10 of31
O -2 s .
£ .?
? £
H
cB
(h
O
ja I®
cB ||
hJ *2
iS
hJ ^
<1
PQ
o
O'
— TT
I 9
O
•a &-
5 So
> C/3 C^
*
o o
J JS
C/3 C/3
C/3 C/3
UJ UJ
£ 00
£ |
c« D
s
e2
^ u
u u
d§ §
W-
3‘
R R
u u
oh -
y y
o o
sO SO
a
s
lJ
§
$
s
r<:
K
P=
8
■ ft.
U
2
O 0 > C /3
• - <5 S T.
j= W So —
^ c O Tj-
< ^
S s
g Si,
§ S
Z CL
N ^
o 5
9 2
!S .a
E o- o
cu £ c/3
C/3 A -
— C/3 C
5 UJ S
c/j
« _« « 52
U U U Q
6
►
X
o
+J
cB
Sh
O
J3
cB
kJ
<1
PQ
•s T
11
“? t
H
* I
&
§•§
C/3 C/3
t & M
B 2 •£
2 2«
J i 2
J J i
C/3 C/3
C/3 C/3 _
UJ UJ C/3
&
-o
oo
OO
E
i/j
E -S
ec
"5
£
u u.
u u
III I
C S SO
w| is N
_ *zs «n
Ti (S IN
2 rj <N
fN «N
* «
a-
g a
§ s
-I
a
SI
§
X
-J
I
tj.
o
5«3
e--
K
s
_- a.
S U
S 2
E ■ _
§ C> C/3
C W
= 8
C/3 ^
s ;
E
c« r
Z Ou
jog®
gS :
" u -n “
8 a. I 5
CL
E
U O U O a.
■8
fi
X
UJ
eg
§ ^
F •
< J5
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 him Aim I SSI alxiralon com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http '"»» ):SSUilxmii..r\ com
Dependability • Quality . Service Dependability « Quality • Service
Page 11 of 31 Page 12 of 31
s s
■f Tf
U U
a§ §
a;
fcH
O
■M
re
u
O
-Q
cC
<1
PQ
t 1
is
11
11
ll
I ’s
c/3 c/3
2 2 5 .*
o o 2 ob
X5 .O C
re re ju c
J J o. M
C/3 C/3 £ -tf
M W 3 C
lu lu c/3 D
ec
«■
2
£
a
a a
o
£
3
a:
8
a.
O
5
. iO
c o
S i/i
o u
— « „
1^82
>, N
£ O
s s
«- <U
11
c? t
a; (
a ii -
CD
o
C
2
4> « 0>
U U U Q a.
> .a
II
»H , ij
o 1 4 .
■M I JF
0! 5 E
U r c
© !>
-Q -I
re
<
* s
2's
<
m
&L
C/0
X
*«J
&
K
X
<N O'
O (N
— O
£ <8 di
t&ii-o
s s 5 ?
iisf
c/3 c/3 £ t:
c/3 c/3 « c
U ui / D
cc
o3
2
15
—
r o
-- o
R <N
C £ £ -
uj T ffi
J"
<
N,
o
N
£ o
a £
z £
11
C u
ill
E a O
js iS
Is!
c a £
cc
o
1
.c
1
2
c
o
s
X
UJ
u u
u u
111 I
a?
H *
* ^
al
a a
§ i
-21
SI
J
I I
185 Fiances Avenue, Cranston. RJ 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 him./A>ww.l-SSI.ahuralo«T.coni 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hmv ;!w\w\ KSSUboraturv com
Dependability ♦ Qualily • Service Dependability • Quality a Service
Page 13 of31 Page 14 of31
•-
o
■M
cd
u
O
-Q
cd
hJ
<
PQ
.0 ^
.0 *9
-c ^
* £
S'"s
I!3
£ §• * I 1
S S U 81)
S 2 «
c o y so
X> X) C
B « « c
^ ►J a. cq
c/3 c/j E -s
w w « c
ti ti v) D
6
c
a.
<J
2
UJ
c
« 8 *5. *>
s e
E
Z a.
<D Si
— CO
u o
r->
(N
C«
5
e2
B
o
«T)
o
t *-1
X
w
11=
3:
* «
^ u
a-
-
et
S
• t>
— u
§ i
2 s
o
'J
=
6
c
fiu
<J
2
t-M
s
< ^
o£
|1
I 2
Z a.
! |
u u
13 3
£ 13
a
Q.
ec
w
s
£
m
Q
»/~i
O
r*l
1
TS
S
✓
UJ
u u
U CJ
a§ §
gj
h> «N —
>n vo
5 5
si-
E
a a
s s
-i
o
i| -s
1! ^
00
CO
0.
8
i s
51
£•
■i
5
F €'
I
- I
u 2
«
m
z s
n§ §
N r-i
X
Ll
o
cd
—
o
cd
h-J
<
PQ
| r
15 l
H
Jfl
Is
* i
O' J
<N O'
O fN
—- o
I 5
m m
fr
c
s
5
X .
« « jd
J J S- a
in tn E =
m in n =
UJ uj in D
£ «
o X
$
E
2
S
£
e e
q|-
£
L|
a a
i i
Q
SI
£
a
■-J
§
-
u
S
£
gc
G
4> C/3
V —
w ss
C o
>» N
S O
S 2
Q -
*> -b .2
jj 72
E £■ o
ed £ C/3
C/3 cd •*-
— C/3 C
„ „ g o o
LC LC — td rti
O U CJ O 0.
E
cd
Z
CQ
o
o3
2
► -a
Ll
O
+J
cd
U
o
-Q
cd
14
li
i
1
* *
<
CQ
O ju
j* cx
I IS ^
£ £ X -O
1 I S J?
2 i s f
(0 fl « c
J a. m
C/3 c/3 £ r
C/3 C/3 5 C
U1 UJ C/3 3
CQ
—
w
2
£
5
.x
e
p;
S
_• a.
f u
2
E •
II
> >
c tU
UJ c
If
g a
it
1 1
11
u C
g
C/3 O
>» N ^ <N
^ z:
o
s ~
ill
E 9- o
g O §
r= 5 fc
U U CL
cc
o
V
2
c
o
5
Cd
8
X
UJ
!l§ §
9:
"2:
s r
a :
C ;:
<
5 5
ol“ -
E
-I
« s
s 5
-I
-
_
s -
$ S
< <
* !
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston. RJ 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 htin./Awvw.l .-.sSLahoratorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 bun Avuu l-.SSI,aNn»t»r\ corn
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Pagel7of31 Pagel8of31
s-l
o
+■>
ee
o
43
cO
CD
11
f s
11
!
s S
r^l
O' .
<N O'
O CO
— O
•S 9
O j/
* l_
o c -
_ o
C/3 C/3
& t'
o o
£ oo
. . . ■§,
JC> £} *- C
CO *9 J> C
^ O. cfl
c/3 c/3 £ ••=
^ fl c
UJ UJ c/3 D
—- o-
«3 O
c ^
I
UJ
o
< •'■
O 9
oi
§ 2
Z a.
g s
§ s
w £
c O
, N S —
OS 00
9 ~
-b
03 ”
03 03
u &
Cl
E a
5 E
C/3 CO
~ c/3
c
03
ec
CJ
£
CD
o
1
2
n§ §
VO
*^,1 **1 r *“:
"I <N CS
_. O <N
■O «r> «/i
s * -
£ " ~
«22
<1 1
el"
-I
0\
sl
' ' U Q cl
> .a
— c
!
ao
<o
CL
J. 8
vC >
«
n
£ *
- I
K
d
Sh
o
■M
CO
(h
o
43
cO
<5
CD
I -8
1 .$
1 ^
ft
Is
*1
^ 2
2 -s
ro O'
© co
— o
•§ a
O
■a f-
I <2 5
I 1 S »
II 2 g»
J3 ^ 1
— — Oi tg
C/3 C/3 £ -
C/3 C/3 03 J“
UJ UJ C/3 D
1
Lh
o
1
+->
S
c$
9
j
-
1
o
l§ S
U5
cti
"5 ^
t 5
6
c,
__r a-
£ |
2 y
o 5
E '
C 53
-53 03
> >
c uj
UJ c
SI
< ?
O O
si
« £
Z a.
O U O
S "
« -n J2
al ^
E £■ °
c 0 E C/3
C/3 CO —
s *2 8
fc
CL
CC
4*
e2
■g
U
x
UJ
u o
IN
a:
•=-
? P
eo I
5 z
< s
a-
a a
§ s
-I
C
sl
o
O'
00
C0
CL
'O >
1 1
a
5
£ £
£
<
5
C
e
II
II;
s s
u u
u u
8 8
o
c«
II
C/2
5
§
s
&
O' J
<N O'
© CN
— O
-o y
O J>
—: a.
3 U
§2
I «
C W O' -
8 §
3f
< s
o Q
11
5 2
Z Ou
4) 4)
u u
os h
a -
u -b «;
Q. ® 3
E £. O
«J £ C/5
C/5 eO *-
— C/5 C
g 2 §
— cd q
U a a.
«
2
t-l
o
It
Work
Samp
Soil
m
e
<
-Q
c«
11
s 2 s «,
-1
^ 5
2 2 « **
o o 5 OO
-D X5 ^ C
d
S's
« (3 « c
J J a tfj
C/5 C/5 P -
e/i or) id C
U U] c/5 P
j
ffl
C/5
-j
5
s
■o
©
£
cc
s
2
0
s
8 8
-)i
Q
S 2
II
SI:
u u
u u
8 8
Sh
O
ce
u
o
-Q
CC
h-3
<
m
I i
|
1
»h
o
|
4-J
E
cd
*-
5
u,
|
O
t§
-Q
1
cd
|
J
£
CD
0
CD
<
1
1 s
O jy
- E -
•g 5 o
:> c/5 <*>
g* £ *
o 2 •£
2 2 1
£ £ ^
3 3 1
E
C/5 C/5
C/5 C/5 w
UJ W CA 3
y.
I
£ a § *
a Q-
S 13 |
I! I 2
I | £ I
U O Q a!
cc
aS
2
2
CD
O
■S
.c
1
2
c
o
5
2
* *
el'
E
j|
s s
s s
-I
-!
> -*
■a 5 -=
= 2 ’
_
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, Ri 02910*2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-4614486 h mv/Avvnv 1 SSI aliotaUuv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel: 401461-7181 Fax:401461-4486 (utp . '"WU -KSSI.alxrialorvcim!
Dependability • (Quality • Service Dependability • Quality • Service
Page 21 of 31 Page 22 of 31
L
O
+■>
03
L
o
-Q
cd
lJ
<1
M
.1 •s
•2 t5
* I
.s s
l Ns
O
11
S'«
*3 Q0
a «g
y_ ao
E
CS (Q V
*“J N-J * Q
^ ^ E |
C/3 00 ed J=
UJ UJ C/5 O
"5
s
£
a-
a§ §
*«
a-
y y
§ s
sp
CL
£•
I!
-1
>2
I
a.
U
2
os
cf
&
§
8
8
s*
o £
g °
S n
C/) '«■
ON —
O tT
N ^
a S ^
o ^ 5 ^
fli o. _ ^
■—. C Q. o
2 CO £ On
cl on 03 —
D 0) U " U
U 0 U Q cl
ca
o
>» -i
I i 2
c < J
=
o -1
■M
05
Li
n
i-S
O •? &
Jq j *
« .11
J s
ti
<
PQ
<N O'
O <N
— O
-o 9
O
•g t-
III
# « III
g 1 £ * -5
S 2 U M
2 2 ca
£ 2 2 g>
ffl B « c
^ a. in
w W £ H
t/3 w a c
UJ UJ cm D
ec
"S
e2
W ©
“ s
U
ii§ i
aa 2
•og g
a-
y y
s s
nC >
i
£*
1
5
-I
Q
On
X
*^J
5
£<J
g
*Z
«3
o
a.
□
o g>
< ^
a 9
00
o
£ 00
o *“
on r J’
On —
© •*
, N
o _
S =
Is
3
« 2
Z a.
u u
« a 2
r= 5 t>
U O cl
■g
**> —
S £
A
5 ■«
p ■
< J$
a
a
u
o
s£>
£
X
ca
U.
p
©
os
c
5
00
5 S
•**
u u
u u
g*
tH
o
re
t-
o
J3
re
J
h-3
05
14
!!
li
fl
£ *
o
-1-
g 1 5
? w »i
£ £ 5
2 S C
S 2 «
£ 2 2
3 3-* a
1/3 to E 'S
to to M =
UJ uj c/5 D
■§>
E
CQ
Z
<►
(2
i i
a a
§ i
5
K
a
I
I
8 o -o
flj r- r-
I
c -
43 I
E o. c
5 E «/5
C/5 as —
i « §
uu o S
1
J=
1
2
O
5
S
X
UJ
2 4 ?
re
c
I I
a
o
X
CO
U.
£•
«/■>
•B
8
■§
U
§ :=
< D
t
•o
§
1 -o
4> ,4>
p. D
§ - .=
' E E
J J
Q c oo = ~
-o = °3
c € S 5 "
“ -s §
w c u
E - E
■-C
_ E
3 O
v e5
8 2
B C
« CTN
£ u
« £
po ■£:
3 o
*+; c
O o
(/) d
11
I §
§ §
§ -i
s s
_ _ T3 TD
«0 3 3 3
il
I I
“ 5
8 g
“• 8
5 S
J*' T3
h| 8 8 | 8g i
0 2£s&*; = -i
Z ^ ^ D Qi c
§.| ^ O °f |
! E | | f E E 1
-O 4) « 4)
O <!)«-♦-*-
E t> 3 ~5 "3
— 3
£1
g $
c
o
1
t:
a
"o «
— O 00
2.2.2
S *
Cl 9
2 8
3 <*
o> o
QL Z
<1
1 I
« c
3 o
J £
o 2>
3 Q
*egg§8
■o ^ ^ J J
£
} is U. cor —
30 rV
> OC
< z
u.
fc*
"3
5
1
I
5
Attachment B
Sample and Cooler Receipt Checklist SOP 10_0001
•goppm p| Xpoiinj jo «|»qj o) tsgutip ||» >»»»(d
66e d
^ I
lw»^slAlWWll
U j P^tnywi-
«0fN«»V
(•mwoftS) M D»J* r 'fcui*y
^ •up]^t»a
—
(•ihmiflis) M olumbm**y
TT-7-r-r-1 — 7-,-f—n--
4-
; v
N on SSA
njSJsduisx J3|oo3
P«1U|S|33S
IU3S3JJ J3|0O3
/ ON S»A /a
JWIIJ-JJ sadiM M 110-0 «»M Sul ’( u oa Ma «»M WBpnS-MS MiBMpunojo-MO =*P"IS-a P1I°S-CS I1°S-S m«ew
ov
dv
VOA-A 3IU3IS-S K»1D jaquJV-OV «»lt>0 A“d-«l *1<1 uuiwuoo
J V
U V
-r
3ZI-
-4
l
l
—r
—t
— t
-+
-« vyuz-g pnv 3|i»J<Kv-i 'HO=M-9 310»N S 'EONH-»‘tOSZH-{ 'lDH't 'dN'I =P°3 uotnAJwiy
/
°'1
c
Ae-'Sl
t
ol
1
0-'9
Oh
lo^SO^ZQ \
r-f:*)!
~7
b
I
l
/
o.h
or
aocio^^o/ 25?
Z?
c V-<?[
*
&
)
°<r
a
t*o^ IOC,i $0 I 2 J
-Lf.qi
WHot
7
L
1
O ntt
O 'Ol
CVS ^ fa |2^
s
~D
n
(
K
)
Q * Ol
OX
Q'sio^fo/25J
S'
-t-f-U
5
*
1
os
Of
«os 6.0510; 2 cp
5
D
■ff'U
7
*
1
°'9
«h
?os
J
r
T
1
Oh
O't
hosto^ 10/29
£
7
oq-t|
iJJi
'i
P
4*
4
t
*
4
*
X
ijl
o-Jf
OQ
eo<; 10s 10/ Zy
0
m
\
Comment M
1
;
-
k
:
‘
i
:
s
V!
1
s
■S
.
)
1
j
<
>
1
l
c
If
i*
|
liauwtuoj^i#
(JWJ n?UllD3p)
Ifld^Cl WMOl
(u r^iMp]
mdao j^ddfl
5UTRNJ S|dures
XIUBW
^-siisodiuoo
0-QBJ9
9UII1
«K>Q39[f03
WVQ
ai ®tdiuBs
q»iss3
>
a
S
m
cr
lapjjj jwfojj -fluiau^ (Qi3ods
7 SupUyJ I3WU03
IWU] ntM :3U1»N iMfejj
002 c-
Z90Z0 V
3HU3AV 11
*3D] ‘jiinsma
BiC(l8i)
*pooAUON
qJ3pu»A
OJIA03030 V23
Pl'»a :rt8Birepv pafojj VZD
onrsuioto OKU3r<ud
9009^1 *3
j=mo x jcm SS 333V y 133x3 :isuuoj
ON S3 A 3|qEJ3AI|3Q 3]U0133(3
"TO aoa don dO>ia-rN d3»-i3 <3du-vk
(3|3ii3 3S33|d) :3 uiaao(|oj sip jo Xub joj tssfcud slip S|
>
moa’/OojBJOqBissa-AAAVM
98tfI9t'(l0t’)xBJ I8U-I9t'(l0t-)’|si
11ZZ-OI6ZO ra ‘U0JSUEJ3 '3nu3AV ssoubjj g8
on] ‘SuuoouiSuj i/ospn/jfo uoipimq
XjojBJoqei SS3
Z*S3H ‘ *1!®!! Suiuodsy
«M>0 3IV AN TN IIN 13 n(vT^ :p3)33|103 3J3M S3|dures 3J3q« 3ms
:<g pjAOiddy qsn-g prepireij y auijx ainx
SS3
AaOlSflD do MIVH3 '
§
o
C! ^
o fO
“ O,
Ol
c*
e>
<
Vi PK
q! P
• • ■” a;
S C ft
TO TO -
uuw
T3
D £
►=. TO
s!
to
u
to
L.
c
o
a.
a
T3
a
u
01
W
E
to
tL'
TO
TO
o-
T3
r~
j/i
TO
C
‘to
XJ
TO
91
>
r-
C-
CL
3
<
0 .
in
T3
TO
u
>-
e
O
r~
TO
*a
tj
i_
TO
>
T3
fc
TO
TO
TO
TO
CL
e
TO
4-*
JZ
XJ
■O
TO
0
C
Ol
0
u
CL
TO
O
u
C
in
U
X
TO
_TO
CL
c
tJ
c
0
a
TO
Q.
TO
O
(/)
TO
E
TO
L_
XJ
l A
TO
E
E
-O
E
3
C
O
X)
TO
CO
TO
sz
TO
</)
i_
TO
O
k-
TO
XJ
Ol
c
C
TO
U
O
n
3
l/l
U1
a
CL
O
>>
C
TJ
0
fe
3
>-
c
¥
<
CL
<
10
<
<
O
H
fN
ro
uS
ID
c
5!
£
CL
C
TO
2
c
to
V)
to
E
a.
j/>
TO
TO
TO TO
l/) l/)
Z
Q-
U
O
o
o
2
>*
TJ
O
xj
l/l
3
u
TO
k _
TO
5
N n ^ in
l/> T3 TO
5 - ^
TO
TD
TO
CL
> I/I (/)
> M M
s
a
Ice
F
TO
SI
h
L_
TO
$
§
•O
TO
u
W)
w
in
in
a
TO
TO
TO
>
>-
>-
>*
c
TO
o* —
CO u
>
I ■“
I "S
l/l a-*
j- TO
£ *o
*o
c
TO
S
c
o>
(/I
TO
Q.
E
TO
W
TO
£
JZ
u
XJ
TO
E
T3
C
TO
TO
U TO
u u
o o
u u
o
u
TO
5
1C
o
Q
CL
E
8
u
o
<J
l/l
£ £
id N co oi
■O
TO
TO
c
£
TO
TO
£
E
o
JO
>*
CO
Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.O.n.Q-0-Q.Q.O.Q.Q.Q.Q.a
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.^
COTOCDCaCDTOTOTOroroCOTOTOTOCOTOTOTO
o 5 5 o o o o
UUUTOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
CO C/5 C/3 CO CO CO CO CO t/D CO C/5 CO CO C/> CO CO
w </5 &
Sooooooooooooooooooo
E
c s s sc 2 c & c <c
»-(Mn^'in(DSQooj®^I^J2^^^f s ‘®o>o
Page 29 of 31 , Page 30 of 31
ESS Labo
o s 1
if
ii
•ja
re
u
o
43
re .u
i £
J
<1
pq
u
o
Jf
■M S
P |
* I
til
■5
I
'o
.§
5
C/3
5)
*«J
5
X
u.
o
£
3
r-«i
I
G
V
£
a
o
<d .b
£ >
o c
<* w
nJ o
“O
'SS
Q O
<N
vO
O
rN
o
<
T3
5
c
o
O
2 •«
~ 3
3 «
ed —
£ 3
'5b £
^2 C Q_ O
-*re fl» sr
c/2
tt
4= £
H o
<d
. d.
*3 x
— o
=3
1/5 ^
K S'
o
— « —
-= £2
e S
I 2
CL o
<L» x>
O O
'£■§
3 — 1
a
eo CO
_ C/3
S 3 UJ
o
* fc>
‘S 1
u
a> o
2 X)
s .2
<u
.b «
■C x
G 3
-r > ^
DO —
00 g
eo Cl ■
a
«* 2i
(A q>
'■5 | £
-o
<D .
g *
||
ed >
b 3
* I
00 >
c >
'2 -
'|S
'<d CQ c
,4, o
X 44
a
c/3 <D
t S.
O o
fr D
N a>
«£ X
r E
®. Z
fiu u
u o
5 *
« fc*
u |
e 2
S..8
* 2
(d $
X fcd
C/3
O
.52 §•
CD .3
4^* 3
ed
E ^
< 3.
B id <-»
(D
ID
5 -o
oo .ii
’ 5.
G ^
£
ID
C/3
~ £
L. P
^ D
to
I
D O .
a Jr !
Sb &
b c
O T3
5 3
3 °
a -i
<u ^
Ur
b
G
CL
•s ^
-c a
H o
= 3 S£ i>
c h ”d a
a
ed QJ
£ &
& °
■o —
ed
o
o
•b <u
ii
O ^
C/3 d>
O C/3
CL cd
c/3 <D
£
X
C X cd ed a
- CL <D C b
CO
5. ii c/3
C/3 3
s s =
CQ £5 S
X s
s E
t-
l't
•Z
2 ♦
o
|2 s
- i
<N
VHV92A)l
3dlW3>| JlWTp (MO||3A) Z X<1o O q T l ( 3l ?N/^) I
'Suuum U! Xpoisn3 JO Ujt43 oj S32un|3 ]|« xtj
V1IA ViWD <navw M 1 ^ Murpjo** tii
p03D3j|OD 3i)M S3|duirs S^p3jMOin|3t lUJip 'J^W'VPV 8uipII3 Xfl.
T§m
(ojmeu8tc) :Xop3Aiow^ 3unj_/33t4 « (oaTuruSig) :Xq poqsinbuipy
5a® u ^jvmm
3tu3t§) :Xq p3A3UJij_/3^a (dinaeuSijf) rXcjpIqsittii;^
3UJtX/3ltQ
sW^
*^3UJ(X/33tQ
(04iutu3is) :Xq psqs^uija-y
T7TI1
(ojiucu3i$) :Xq poAukiyi
01UIX/3J*!
5jmru3|5) :Xq p^q^inbuipy
C Utninf - l i / J • * | r' ^ ij :auJUIUl 03
1^- :Xq pj|dults
'-6'»V u Z' 8 'ppv 3iqJosv-Z, ‘H0 5 N "9*HO E N 'S ‘‘ONH f/'’OS'H £ ‘IDH '£ 'JM "I 3 P°3 uohiajmjjj
SU^OlUqDDJ^ [ ] -fVTl^X fj0^ dlU5J - 13(003
Jit|»(| U : VN °N W A i 3 t!U]Sft 3 s
^l u O 5S H Ofj »aG iu3Swjj5]0O3
V~
SJ 31 |!J-J |!Q-Q JJigyySripiuuQ-^q jart^ jjrjin^.^s uit^ punojg-^Q joity^ j3pn|s q p!|°S 0S P°S S :I 1- 1IC P1 | VOA A »1P»S-S » n 13 r ^ X I°J <1 ^-<1 »uiriu<Q
t
7
1
°-r/- »w
-tr/<z)iz boi^s
9
61
Tf-M
=C-
JL
1
O * <? i~ &’j£
o/C b°S>i>QJ*V
5
>.
f><--M
b\
l
1
0 s-o■ 1
■Sos-to^^gi-xy
A
^i = M
JL
l
Q")-OS
tos 60rZ^J
»C
Hi
-7TVI—
>L
A
•
o-j^o'h
~so?wy
J
^ ^ 1
6 H
- 7* -
JL
1
s
at,-or
c <Joi-z9
>
01 l/ll
%
-t-i-
1
*
O f* - era
to; 10^4,01 Zj
9.
X
w
T
1
on-o- c./
risnc^^^J
X
4s-.ol
;
-t
1
•«?
0 07- o'*
o/;i<?5 « o^-z-9
s
V
-sr :yi
r
'll
T
9V
1
o«- c> L
s
X
9^ :C )i
nijn. i<ji
a.
|
1
8,
9
3
C
5*
3
1 Number of Containers
Pres
Code
■Kid 3(j
("1“
^MDOZ) uoneoynuapj 3|duir$
MATRIX
O
5
o>
COMP
uouaojjo^
3«a
# 3|dmi;s
0VTSS3
/vo n
ssaippv p^uig
ooiif (my
, xej «xuoqdxpx
V ^ Ooorryotv
#OJ d| z M "S x> °
£'vfc?ao''V/i /,/-!?
ssajppv
4rep ’vw
UOSJJjJ J3YJU03
r^/vun
(H»| 3O jnj307) auirsj Ujfojj
>^5/ LI
# jaafoj <
Y^)
siutn-oD
sisA|tuv pJJtnbjg MHfll
tflQl lh'
I OlXDJfO^JgVT SS3
9|(jrJ9AlpQ OIUOJU5J3
saiujiq SuQJod>^{
31V AN (N HN p 1)1 VIV
:U!OJJ P^139||03 3J3M S9|duJYt 31Y3g
" 4 p^jinbsi *i Xioieioqt[ /q |tAoaddr joud *sXcp ^ ucqi J 3 Ufj jj
~»*PO
pjrprra^
aunj^ an\L
^ s 8 ej
AQOXSAG JO NIVH3
92W-19* (I0J-) XE J 181^-19^ (10*0 VI
l \ZZ-0\6Z0 1 ^ ‘UOJSUEJ 3 - 3 nU 5 AV S 33 UEJJ ^gl
3 Ui ‘SuuituiSuq (pspiqr fo uoutaiq
XjojcjoqEq esq
Page 31 of31 Page 1 of 23
o
m
O
-
•2
o
<
N
o
« 2
Z a.
1 1
0 u
T3 ^
C ^
CO <
U
S 3
£ <
■Sill
<
o
>
go E
.£ o
C °
o
cx -o
O' o
O' c
8
—
3 >
o .32
E t
i- «
.9
5 g 1
"8
8
H
£
u
u
w
=2
U
-
a.
**
<
t/3
2
E
o
■8
u
i
8
c.
E
S
f £
S “
■S »
i -5
I 8
t a
8
t E
2 ~ a>
2 >
£ E S
3 2 £
o c
00 x
«/i ®
UJ o
11 1
1st
- E "8
O jc |
2 1 S
8 u>
o 8
C r —
llJl
«b a 2
Oi eo
E E
<U w
e i
-a U
(§ 3
t c
o to
pi
GO g
a> o
3
O ~
a.
U
2
8 8
>■ ^
= 3
CO
J si
* s E
j *
-*= <
i>
ii
•c -g 3
111
£ 3
J= 5 8
| 8
_e
5 E
e
s
"2 o
c 1 i
sll
is 3 .2 -Q
8
a.
i_
* « os
3 <■> Z.
X *5
S 3
u
© «
u. •£
Qu
u
1
I
£
5
•r.
5
X
2
U
a
—
E
.2
8
s
’Crarssrssrassrsrssrs
■5000000000000
ic/5C/5C/5C/3C/3C/3C/3C/5C/DC/5t/3C/3
«< n tJ O O N f
cooo^ — — c _ _ _
j5C/5C/3C/3£c/5C/5C/)C/3C/5C/3</)c/3
Z — c*-\ O' — — «/G I"- O' —
OOO V/J O •— OOOOO—-
4*COC/5C/3”t/5C/2C/}C/3C/)C/3C/DC/3
fl"Z”"''" ISNNNNN
|nnn3nnnSnnnn
10OOO OOOOOOOO
A — <N ^ *r> v© » » O - M
|SSSl§i§§l533
m ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r^, r*\ r^i
- _ ■ ■ i-i ■■ 1 r’ 1
Z o o o o
OOOOO
* 'T -<T Tf Tt TT
n , <T 7 'T 'T tT
185 Franco Avenue Cranston RJ 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax 401-46 M486 hi m/Am« I SSI alx.tamn com 185 Frances Avenue. Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 Imp '»»« 1 SSUIa.nn.in com
Dependability . Quality . Service Dependability . Quality . Serv,ee
Page 2 of 23 Page 3 of23
o
o
o
o o
Z
Z
Z
Z Z
X
g
/ *“ s
V)
(U
«?
4>
>-
>■
>*
>* >*
is
-c
*1
s §
-K ^
if
ft
S s
•«
I
^ Q o
5 S
&■*
6
£L
I c
II
bt
•| §
^ V)
f =5
.8 |
5* S
§ I
^ C
"5* S
S ^
® "5
S T
•5
i *
l
^ i
%> «
i*. :
^5 5
s -2
s «
H
*5
Su ^1
. 6 *
l!
11
2 t
S-
6 £ Z
® 2 ^
> fl Ji
1 a|
«, «3 CL.
vO
M
U.
X
vC
T
£•
5
o
S
Z
o
SS
2£
U
>
>
U
o
J
o
a
o
x
H
u
oc
a
1/3
2
a.
u
oo
5
C/J C
2 -S
p. 85
O oo
" 5
aj c
a c
M 3 ■
p i
5
U ~
u B
2 &
■£ cr cr
a> ^ ^
£
a
— ca
- — cu x
3 3 U Jr*
O O •— a-
O « TJ TJ
w 1
■o
5 !
a-
' J
t— H
TD T3 a.
c c rt
CO W
00 M ’O
2 ^ — <u
2 3 § M
<C < C/D C/D C/D
< < Cfl < u u u
*Z, o o o o o o
8 n v- ■£) - n o
O O O ‘Xj ‘X- *Xi
m r*D r*i fn f«5 m <*i
o a.
i-s
< o
I C/D
< CD U •
— vO O O O «r>
rj- tj- oo m m
< 2
^ <
VO
5
oo
C fl
H
Z
w
0*
as
-
U
—« •— <s *— O'
2 8 2°?
o
^r
I 8
31
o
£
&
u >.
H .t?
1
s
e
u
I 4
11
ji
o
6
5 E -•=
^ 03 O
> t/3 CO
6 b x -a
2 2 c lo
2 2 w
o o *5 'm
-° -c ^ c
eg ea o C
^ a. wj
co co £ -
co co « c
UJ LU CO D
—' OL
3 U
s s
E
c o
W CO
5 8
C UJ C«
"’ 11
S o
CO
U
I
§92
u W
§ I g
JS *o 42
o.
o
Z — >» TO
0- CO
E co
QJ 0) _ _
o u u -
Q a.
JO
5
w
2
£
oa
O
O
m
T3
C
<u
s
m §
g;
II
u u
2 2
H- °
al -
<N
Cm
o
p*
CL
J. 8
vO >
ll
NC
T
a
5
(2 fr
©
OS
tf
S
u
m O
O fo
— O
|||
> </) </i
t £■ *
3 2 ’E
! S «
.8 .8 2
J .3 i
E
£
■a
oo
00
E
c« t/j = S
id ill n 3
CO
«
s
S
1
Lh
C
1
4->
E
cd
c
•5
ci
|
o
Ǥ
JQ
1
etf
I
£
CD
o
S
CD
.0
.5
w
-
5
*-2
s;
a:
<2
a.
0
s
• <N
1 S VO
> 5 ^
(2 <f> *
—
!*■
o9
i 1
Z a
1 I
u o
9 ~
15 I
E a o
5 E »
CO ea —
I* §
cil
£
as
c
«o
O
fO
1
t
2
!l§ §
sh$ $
"I <N «N
— m »/■>
^ r~> r.
*3 — —
II I
a-
E
-I
s i
2 9>
H «n
5 3
j
£
2 8
1 j
o
K
co *
U.
= 1
!.
8
6
£
r *
©
U
O
03
u
O
X
03
.J
i I
S s
II
Sg
£ v
<
P3
Tf
o 2
n o
o <*">
— o
■a |«
5 5 5
I> C/5 C/5
£ £ x
O O —
o y
X) X> _
rt « « c
•- 1 i - ) a. ot
c/5 c/5 £ ■=
w w fl c
UJ UJ c/5 D
t2
SO SO
.el 2 2
do o
Mlu U
ll§ §
>.1 r-j (N
wl oi <N
a s
ss
2
o
s
r~
s
_- a.
S y
c 2
<u ^
E 4
c 6
• S 6 t «s
C W 00 —
gc-2
6
<
o
■b 45
^, a> r5
c" a. "o
2 S E w
a. c/5 re ~
— ^ C/3 C
— uo — re a)
U U U Q cu
CQ
u u
IN
g?
Jh
O
■M
re
Sh
o
-Q
re
i-J
<1
PQ
s J
•s ^
I >
9 §
l|
3 s
II
Vi jr
.< r
o
t |-
^ re 5
?£ C/5 C/5
x -a
£
I I ■§ I 5
I 2 5 g>
re re jo c
^ - 1 a. </i
c/5 c/5 E -
C/5 C/5 re J“
W UJ c/5 D
ce
o
s
£
£ s
s e
* *
u u
tfc|_ o
Ql ^
U 8
§ §
-Jl
e
si
5
u.
u.
K
je
3
CL
□
s
C/5 O
s «
3
<
N
a
a a -
11
tl -5
g IS
Z Cu c/5 re
U U
a> 2: «
o O £
05
c
1
j=
B
s
8
re
x
UJ
* 3 ;
4 i
5 *«
< J
00
re
cu
o
X
M ♦
u.
o
0£
c
o
i
u
sn
oc
00
re
cu
sO
£•
6
L
CL
(J
2
$
< "
Ss
il
« s
Z Ou
u o
co
a
o
s
f2
03
o
iTi
o
ro
~o
O
1
2
3 3
N *
si U
§1- -
a a
► .a
— C
l
u
O
+j
eC
•-
O
45
03
hJ
PQ
•c
ii
*{
i s
S I
m
©
C
o
Jig
# « «
& £ *
2 2s
2 2 S
3 £ S
J J ■§.
a. </i
oo oo £ ;=
C/D c/j 3 J=
111 ill » 3
o
|
s
cd
I
-
1
o
42
■s
c3
a
i.
h -3
V.
cd
O
R
CD
c
W
-
5
~
o
c
S CO
£ *o>
8 v.
43 C =
Q -
S 1? I
— — — co
u u u 5
CL
50
2
a5
s
f2
CC
-
8
5
*4 ^
u u
m §
a-
§ §
-
si
*
|
S5 ^
*3 ct ^
Si.
}t
<1 <
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston. RJ 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hup 7nu\\ 1 S^l aUmitorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hup www l .ssi aUmnorv com
Dependability ♦ Qualm ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 10 of 23 Page 11 of 23
s §
51:
Sh
j!
S c
O -i .
■m •! >
co s s
J- r. S
© !|
eO .11
_) »•*
s i£
hJ ^
<!
pq
o jy
■s §•_
1 <2 5
§• £ x £
2 2 'C m
2 2 S ^
o o ^ oo
X) -O ^ C
s s i 1
UJ UJ 7) D
s
C/
t2
a
2
‘*0
1
S
3
£
l
— r cu
s y
<u ^
E ' ^
c ti o
o <u c/3 m
t f'l tT
* [2 S jj
w IN —
PJ
11
< ?
o 9
N ~~
o 5
6 -
9 ■= s 3
E •”
« a
Z o.
E “■ o
cO £ C/3
U U U Q (£
CO
1
2
<31 g g
II
8 8
«n <n
^1 oi oj
s >j
O -2 .
+J •! >
cO £ S
Li fcj
o II
cd 11
i-J
X ^
<1
P3
•8 Q
O
•s |_
5 I O
> C/3 C/3
£ £ *
O O -
2 2 a
J 5 s
2 3*
E
t
T3
00
oo
E
C/) C/3 e -
C/3 C/3 tv
UJ UJ 7) D
V)
•3
Lh
O
1
4->
5
aS
j
u
|
O
tg £3
X
a
■8 s2
<2 ^
3 5
6
c
_r ou
h3
g 1
2 □
§ s
CD
^ &
5 ^
§ 1
CD
•2 , K
•8 ^
— 0
> >
c to
W
5 1 i
UJ p.
SI
< ^
o 9
11
S 2
Z a.
c c
a> o
0 G
o
C/3 o
1 «
<s •"
~ Tr
N 9 5
05*
9 -
ll 3
I |S
C/3 CO *-
— C/3 £
5 « 2
— *0 «i
U O a.
ec
—
o
2
(2
03
o
*2
ti
X
UJ
* *
u u
ol-
E
j|
y g
§ §
Q
Si
s 5
ii
in
o
X
a ♦
U.
.£•
6
</~i
X
ao
CO
CL
L.
6
c
_T Du
2 U
c
OJ «
E ' 00
r C O
O D t/1 N
w
O
3
<
8 s
N ^
o 5
6 2
Z ft.
£
CQ
o
«/-,
o
-a
c
V
2
s s
g-
u
I g
a-
§ s
-1
a
sl
•s ac
m d
— »*>
> .S
s
■'t
X
0
U.
£
6
m
X
I
X
Cl
*
w
r*-.
r-*.
s
u
c
—' 0 -
2 O
g 2
1 C 8
2 i g K
s <2 a =
C — *7
—
g
Sss
>» N ^ ^
£ o 5 3
D 2
Bill
!I! H
iiisf
s: jz — m «>
U O U O fi.
v©
■*9-
r
U
u
III §
ol~
2C
!£
a
£
ac
CQ
H
1
J
5
2
o
£
"T
2 8
sO >
2 3
x
0
u.
£
1
5
e
u
O
cd
u
O
-Q
cd
H-J
I.?
II
.0 r®
i *
11
<
PQ
o
m
O
O _S>
I
t t
o o
I O
C/D C/3
f
E
X) JO
J3 J
S3 S3 I ^
U U u 3
III I
SI
* 8
* *
*4 U
§1“ "
01)
CO
Qu
J. 8
nC ’>
t t
—. e/3
s
£
£ .S'
a
*-3
5
o
£
y
a:
8
CL.
U
2
O C/D tj
- <5 ZZ V.
g Cfl 5
OI
<Sf
< ?
o 9
E
a S
Z a.
N ^ ol
On ^
a 2
Is I
I 1(2
e c c w »
D D D 2 P
— — — cd g>
u U U Q CU
CQ
o
11
< J
= i
fN ^
U
O
+J
cd
O
-Q
cd
<
PQ
i ^
:| .$
1 §
i
«3
.c
m O
o
— o
I I I
£ £ * -o
I I s 9
II s g>
cd ed ^a> c
J a e/j
c/d c4) c .r
C/D C/D cd J=
UJ tu C/D ID
«
o
£
*: ns
u u
ll§ §
9:
* ^
ol“ -
E
-I
8 8
vO >
*? o
£•
5
t- _§■
ii
I
K
r<:
K
a:
_• o.
2 Q
S 2
E '
o gS
-- <D
> >
e uu
w e
< ^
8 S
il
§ ©
Z ft.
c c
o o
0 U
rf
S O'
9 ~
I? S
I 1(2
C/D ed —
B 1/3 S
5 «2 o
7= ™ o
O Q ft.
■g
S
x
UJ
c «
m v
S-l
o •
4-i '
cd
U
O
43
cd
I
<
PQ
c/3
C/3
UJ
2 « c?
C/3 _E C
„ v M
E -B E
o
c
cd |
§2
•~j
S
5
>«
£
a;
8
0) T3
+* <u
—r o-
2 O
5 5
e •
< "
Ss
1 t
a S
Z cl.
a> a>
U U
^ -s ■£
2 <D 43
c > 00
£ I %
•2 o
Q
p
U
£
UJ
D
f-
O
Z
r
8. Q
B .§
c .o 2
3 t o
« ^ Cj
8 9 cf*
id tg U
2P - <u
o a> 2
t Mt
t
o V3
Cl f—
1? S S M
II
>. -Q
cd 3
— « « 2 2
E E
_d _d .3 cd
•8
*d 2 <i>
JE' 2 >» "o.
cd _3 co c
< 5 < C/3
E -
0)
a:
a> 3 _j
Qcy c
EE
3 3 3 a. 0)
£-
>
cd —
— ^ o <u
a o cd
9 -=
,= ,*.= .5 S
2 2 J J Q
43 c C C c/i
3
d a
-a Oi
SS JJ
QLa
2 2 2
COI - N W
a:z Uw
au
> Ot
< z
u
< m
11
§ §
§ §
§ s
11
= &
s s
§ §
8 8
# $
1 1
If
IA T
3 S
Hi 311 iii
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax: 401-461-4486 hup Hwww 1 SSI alxmitorv com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hup '\v\\\\ l.SSl,alx>raior\ com
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
Page 18 of 23 Page 19 of 23
CQ ^
~ °
£8
E 0 '
u ’ H
ro Cl
H O
< V)
Q m u
S 3 U
jj a o»
t! *3
<u tJ 2
o' & a-
£°o
in
in (u s"
111 *J >
ra to
.2 ui
2 £
u
4) —
JZ ^
U C
<u
Q. E
(U c
u o
V ~
c
U LU
V o
03
S U
o <
T3
■• 01
O »-
— 03
^ >
8*03
**8
a 03
SB
</)
03 ~
= si
U V)
0 )
u
01
u
c
o
a
3
T3
a
.*
u
D
£
U
0)
£
5
V)
E
01
•a
03
£
03
V)
03
03
CL
o
r-
T3
03
IA
3
£
03
C
_03
Q.
E
*o
c
O
u
03
Cl
E
03
03
CL
O
< Q-
O
Z
IA V)
03 03
>• >
03
C
IA
03
E
_3
O
>
_03
Cl
E
03
V)
4->
c
03
O
£
3
W
T3
03
T3
03
03
C
03
c
c
o
o
c
o
u
JD
3
l/)
>•
C
<
rg m rr in
o
_to
03
-□
_ro
in
in
UJ
£
<
LO
T3
03
>
03
U
01
k.
V)
^03
a.
E
ro
IA
0)
L.
03
5
o
<
<A
03
IA
03
z
z
>-
>-
C
03
C
03
z
CQ
t.
<
c
03
LA
03
k-
CL
JA
03
0 )
in
>*
*o
o
4-*
(A
3
■: u
£ a
- a
< >
z
Q.
u
O
o
l/l
O
►H
03
Q.
E
03
in
in
in
.o
3
h iu in
03 J—
C <
< H
c
03
r- — -r
CL .Q
03
03
in
>*
•o
o
4->
l/l
3
u
03
L.
03
5
= o;
03 O
■n O
ra u
CC 03
IA l/l
a
Cl
Si
£
..
03
JC
i—
u,
03
$
O
O
u
T 3
03
U
*o
03
4-1
03
XJ
"O
c
03
*o
03
C
Ol
u u
o o
u u
5 5
03
E
u
o
u
03
si
4-*
lA
03
O
O
n>'
tl
£
i_
o
u
T 3
C
03
03
CL
E
o
o
u
o
u
IA
c
03
CL
X
03
l/l
03
03
4-*
IA
(A
IA
3
U
IA
T3
O
4-*
l—
03
C31
03
C
03
E
u
03
O
i_
CL
TD
03
0)
C
03
u
03
IA
03
5
rg r> n* m
kO N CO O'
00
CO
CL
mi
<
UJ
7
Z
o
x
>
z
UJ
<
J
UJ
3 3 3
<S4
f ? ?,
O'
r-
o
o
—
c/i
•<
i_ “
2 a
z x
d
r^i
■*T
fN
o
\E
cL
I
£
o
Z
3
1/3
>*
*
z
O'
m
I
rs
d>
r^>
r^i
CL
1/3
?
c
3
>•
X
N
t/5
s
UJ
=
u
•s
p ^ -t
1 u
f s
o
< _1
5 «r
a i
< -3
■5
1
O
-J
U
O
o
y.
u.
6
O'
CN
O
VMV9O01
idlJUU 1UJIQ (*0(1J A ) Z 1).-J (31!HA) 1
'Suiium ui Xpojm^ jo uihq 01 uSurip |[e itj
VIIA WVD d3CIVW V 1,M »wr*>:>:>* ui
p3OJ|]03 U3M u|dum u8p3|MOui|ir lustp Vjon-V»N 3u !P J P x 0.
T
77/
jmiX/ajBQ
(airueUSt^ :Xq
(aj(uvu9i$j ; Xq px
T
aunjyaiti
SOT^7
(ajniruSJis) :Xq poqsyibutK
(ajruru#>s) rJqfaqSiifnuflafl
auijx/Mtg/ |
&W\mi
9unjjm(i I
(ajrutu3f5) :Xq p3Aia3^>J
aunjya^a
SfiSl l^/AA
3UJIj./3iea
(ajrueuSis) :Xq paipinbuipy
(3Jniru9|5) :Xq paqstU&uip^
:nu3uiiuo3
:Xq p^uiTj
- -nvuz -g *ppv 3?qJo$v -L HO*W '9 HO c N S **ONH **OS , H*€ IDH 'Z UN *1 3 P°D wo P* AJJ5M d
surpiuq33jL ( ]
Xj u o asff'jrujuu]^
~H?1 J3p-T ^*Q:du»x»l°°3
; : vn °N
°N*
«A
«A"
/L
U*1U] SJW$
JU3S3JJ J3J0O3
00
CO
a.
» d Mti7& 1*0-0 J31e A ^“I'Q'AQ “W »'J'*’S-mS ««,* P unol 3-AD i ,le v*k 39 P n ISa P!l°S aS |!°S-S : «J«W VOAA 5 P 151 S-S “'IDS-'^l’Mcl :idx l ioumiKQ
77
7
o r/ - o oi
Tv f v/s (•/> -zj
y
T
9*
o o/-
O'jQ
Q 'lb0S vms
\\
n ^
1-5
mt?>Q
(wjj jo jnj^oz) uouroyiiuapi 0|duie^
U0U33JJ02)
33TQ
# ^“"S
BV3SS3
ssjjppy pcui 3
#Od
# ”3
drz
■?AV —'•’/^?or*V(' AM;
ssojppv
tisX[tuy poiinbo'y oiu/^
1 rscv Afv?
(JW| JO ttvq 0Z ) loofoj J
JS H 1 0 33VSn “SN (I3W-VW
:8utMO]fcq oqa jo Xue joj uofojd Slip sj
«TO iTv AN Vn HN 15 TH VW
: aiOJj pai30[]O3 3J0M sajduits ojoi]a\ 3je 15
' g pannbaj si XjoatJoqBj /q [tAOadd* jojjd *sXep £ ircqi Joisiy jj
JjqiQ_pjrpurag aiuij^ ujn^
{ rs \U
» ujIojj
(^J
. __ a jupud^i-x
-V^V (fOor-nO/V
oin$ Xa?3
4 V/J 7 ^ 0 * ''''O
uosjaj imuo3
3lUTf^ 03
J3l PO ^ad ssawv^r 7 " P»H : a'u*Joj
~°N OWTJOAtpQ 3IUOil33[^
<35.911 hi
. aiA33fO0deVTSS3
niuii'] Sunjodo^
7.
AaOI.Sn3 iO NIVH3
UJOJ'XjOJEJOqejSSJ’MMM
98^-19!” (10^) I8U-I9J’ (10^) PA
IIZZ'OI6ZO ra ‘uojsu^^ ‘aniisAV ssju^jj sgj
■juj '%uu))ui$uj cjjspiqifo uoismiQ
Xjojejoqtjq ssg
y ra^ZAJi
idpro* )U 3.|3 (*oip A ) z xd »3 <)H (»PiA) I
SiniiJM ui Xpoisn3 jo uitq^ 03 ssSueqa jp xtj jscsjj
v ha mo dnavw h 3 ^ x>v*p*<»jt ut
p 3133 J ]03 3 J 3 M S 3 |dajfS » 9 p 3 ]MOU 3 | 3 T JU 31|3 W ^ U !P J P ^ 0 «
T
«lt
3u, ll/ 3ib cT
(ainjruSij) :Xq poAio^d-y
FT ~
~KJ ?«Z
(unmd;S) :Xq
3 UIIJ_/ 3 JF (1
5SH [Jffim
(oimeuSig) :Xq p3qstnbut]3)| 3 uii l/ojc nj 1 (ojnacu2i$) :Xq poAU33^j
5 UI.X/ 3 «q ,
MM"
0 UJ!X/ 3 Jta
(ajnjtuSt^) :Xq pousinbAp^j
oiuijysjtt
(ajnaruSij) :Xq poqvinbui]3^
:s3U3ujujo3
r ^ V7?< ^ :Xqpo|duirs
' -s ‘i:>vuz 8 ‘PPV 3 !qJo«V -L *HCPW ~9 ‘HO r N ^ H ONH '* “OS r H €‘IDH Z ‘dN'I >P°D uoneAJosojj
sucpiuq33j_ [ ]
i ] : VN ON
X|UQ I^JU] o N
!S A
bv
22.
:dup£ J3joc>3
»ewi
IU3S3JJ JOjOO^
SP
CL
Sjjjjy-j |>o-0 “‘'A^uinuua ^a jjtjjnS'AVS «>'/& P unoJ D-AD “WW'A'AA jS P"IS a P!|°S aS |!°S S : =*<u'W VOA A ’!!«>S S «'|3 3 A :*ttx“ u !**«0
T
A
1
O- 5 - 0 ^
r//7 9
<5
>•
rt-t'
d
■i
1
—
0 9- Oh
90 s ^05 T/rz 9
s
Ufffr
<t.<*
1
-
a-A - o r
Aos £ OS *“>r 2 5*
TA . £(
“T~
i.
1
-
a- 0
-e-o? lo^rn-z^
*S
a
OP, ’ll
hljiHjoi
1
\
-
c>*£>/
JT/S 11 5/h^9
A
lS‘hl
-T
l
^ - 55
S
i
J-J-M
•zi
L
1
-
«7
-t!:oS)ii'Z9
9
A
t>'A*
■J
1
1
o-«7- 0 ^
90 s sos in ' 2 - <i 9
S
li
J.
1
l
—
o-A- o-;-
ho « S«s II 179
S
A
ThHvr
9v
\
-
or-ofl
cos 10 c, | 11 - 35 )
A
9h:Vi
\
1
£>
l
f
■%*-
I
O
n
s
c
S
Number of Containers j
?7
S. 2
r%
<y
(«*i*
^ ,r M3 0r) uouoytiuapi a|duttg
s
S
n
s
»
n
0
TJ
aiujX
U01113JJ03
«*a
g 3|duiT^
HVTSS3
■**-> ' iO'f'trQ
sujppy pruiq
»®i!£--9Zr 6
# «J
auotjdapi
'C p 9<r«f 0 -t/>y ^GOr-vi/Otv
#Od <J?Z ams X 10
ic+ bhr
ssaippy
3 -^rvo
uosiaj i^eiuo^
3 rv/vt 0^7
(na|«o ixqoz) auut|v] ijafojj
» JOoXojj
auiejs] of>
Yit/puy piJinb^y
~ ixjiOjf 'JCId l 35r 3 •wuuoj
»N
»A
3|qri3AipQ 3IUOi339(3
qii.D3TO^dgv1SS3
sit ini'] iuiuodry
“4*0
H3VS3 A«N dOW'VH
8ui.t\Oj|Oj aip jo Xur joj ua(ojd siqi sj
«S>0
3K AN fN HN A3 m VK
-UJOJJ p 3 J 33|[03 3 J 3 AR ca|dum 3 i 3 qM 310 ^
g pajinbjj si Xjoirjoqt| Xq pxojddr ioud v\rp ^ urqi jjjiqj[
jaipo pi*puns /\ 3UI *X u«|
'=8*d
AaOlSHD JO NIVHD
UJO 3 -Xj 01 tJOqt|SS 3 -A\jWM
98H--I91- (10^) I8IZ-I9^ (10^) PI
I IZZ'OI6ZO I'd ‘uoisutj^ ‘3nu3Ay ssduejj 5gj
juj ‘2uu»m3uj (psjitcufo uotnniQ
AJOltfJO(JBq
o
-o'
o
to
3
u
c
*1
x
U
■o
o
tfl
H —
£5 i
U5 u
u «
w b
oc «a
w
-3
Cl.
S -
< s
C/3 -g
s
>
o
o
<N
•d
<D
>
O.
£
ed
C/3
00
c
f
5 ■£
^ o
o o
X u
h- OL
1 2
c3 <
tf5 O
c —
6 —
E <
S3
3-0
” 4>
*
a>
<u
DSJ
U
a
< c
a 8
_ X)
** o
■o ^
o cd
1$
> 2
<L> X
ll
ra «
-O £
fi u
S-l
1 ! j
£>.§ i
o - |
o Of) *-
o .5 8
J3 73 SC
2 o 2
I
C/5 2
C/5 •£
“•§•5
3 X T3
3 15 jg
•o p O
ft. c
u -g ss
5 : M «
^ U c
<2 .S -5
p
a> 3> >
o a> a>
III
p 3
§ | g
3|J5
sS?
< bo 2
u « I
> 1 6
■2 c E
x E <u
a .5 .S
£ « g -
h D- !:
“J:§ 1
*3 — ed
S 2 8?i
\p o
£ 0
g- -3
< §
O "O
> -o
c/3
o
i
. 73
O “ o S
S -g « to
cc"
£
„ o «
o > 3
c (U 00
•— 41
>s *> E
E | S3
J 2 E -g
C/3 4}
hI15
s 0
« C/3
■3 fc'-g
1 I 5
» 3 M
Cl. 00 2
u £ .2
2 »!
•a £ ^
U ^ ,
C/3
3 « 8
ST 2 c
2 ^ 2
•3 "3 <2
o c t:
cd cd 4 )
u
>- c e
8 ‘gs
g*8i
2 v.
« ,0
U. L_
o
X
cd
2 u
5. 0
<3 c
g Cd
U- -Q
c= «
5 <L>
2 o
9* x
3 4>
r. dJ
P C/3
-o (u
► -S
o «
E-M)
.5 o op
I bf
E O X
»• ed i£
C/3 W.
2 o o •=
£0X9
— o cd j-
^ 2“ J ^
w — C C/5 <L>
c E — ^ x
Q.“ “ g
^! <§ 1 =
^ 5 c « -o
C o *5 o
o 43 x £■
<L> > — O
•“ « ^
X
cd
c
•o ” 2
- S 0
<
T3 o
O >
5 _ s
E g-c
8 1 E £
UJ 2 = ea
“■ « £
3> g
X
5
-o
—
o
t
o
O
£
>
cd
X
o
■«
i
o
c3
00000
d- d- d- tt
OOOOO
Q\ Q\ Q\ Q\ Q\
O O
5 rr
o o
Qs os
OOOO
Tt rd- rj-
OOOO
On O' O O
CL
U
3
O’
X
3
.2
"O
4 /
s
73
c
< < < < <
OOOOO
r- r-
r- r' r-
< <
o o
< < < <
OOOO
r- r- r- r-
Tf tj* rf ^
r- r- r-
000
•d d- d-
OOO
ON ON O'
< < <
OOO
r- r- r-
00000000000000
>u u u u u
500000
•< 0 NO X NO X
o o
r- r-
' u U
o o
o o
X X
U U U U
OOOO
OOOO
X X X X
OOO
r-
u u u
000
000
XXX
4> 4) 4J 4> 4)
cd cd cd cd cd
flj u u u
cd cd cd cd
•S^ ^ 2 £ £ £ * z £ £ £ £ £
•t-*0-0*0’OT3'TD’0’0’0-0'TD'T3’0’TD
"cccccccccccccc
233333333333333
^■OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
U.U.k-U-k-U.U-1-iL—
OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
<2
E
et __
Zo
aj (N
18
08
c n
(Nnd^XhooONO-(Nnd
00000000 — — — — —
(NM(NMM(NMMM(N<N(NfN
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
0000000000000
w —
— n ^
O
•c
O'
a Tf
3 0
4 rp
X ^
J22;
(Snd^XMOONO-fSnd
00000000 — — — — —
I I I I I I I I I I I I >
d’d-d-d’d’d’d’d’d-d-d’d’d’
OOOOOOOOOOOOO
cpcprpcprprpfpfpcprpcprprp
rfd-ddd-dd’d-d-d’d-d'd’
E
o
i
g
rz
4
/
s
—
cc
c£
sO
X
3
d
c
o .i= —
a>
3 <N
C so
O o
< o
o S
W W
—1 O
lu y
1 <
5 N
a a
s <
■fi s
0)
•o T3
C C
CO C
o ^
O C kJ >3
♦- <D O c
^ O ^
C CO 0)
= 53 | £
u ■*= •§ •«
3
», 5 (U o
<U « G.-S >>
51: -*-•
« -tC tt
o p
<D L- M-
CL O
_ £ a
s g
o u
to
p
— -d
c0 P
11
& <u c
CO -O W
— c0
c0 t X
o O — fc
— -2 „ 4) c -H
>N ^ <L> X <L> b
■5 J U a
S ^ CX "3 ^
2 S3 «!
=> ■=•£ -c g
_ ■“ £ c 7
°^- 8.5
N-I
L_
o
<D Q
o "« 00 .S "3 E
— ~~ C *— /-V
^ 5 2 "2
2c «
-o
p
o
r3
CO
n qj
«T/ ja
£
®. Z
S t
ST’S
u°
•1
133 .
s c
w S
c S
,•: C/3
W C/3
OS u
t; „ [= O
C D (L> 3
a ^ cs o
_ -o CQ ° b 3
E. 2 -o £ o
&-S « .2 rt =
U 4) O. CO
O C O O
E - o >» 0
<u w a
JS’O D
2 3 ^ a
§■ 00 o *
P X 4>
C - w ci>
4)X^ 1 *—
O. o ° ^
ts a„-
15
CO
c
<
I a
o & 8 S
o 0.33
c
■8 S
c E
^ •= a S
3 « £ c
s?gf s
^ H ro u.
= .^°
ab 5. H ^ c
<« = ? g as
■a >•=! '5, E S
x: c *5 3 « 3
t— o <2 & c/3 CT -
ll
1
■ -J—
; 0
s »-
3 O
CO
C/5
<
c u J2 3
■g g < CO
i u.
X <U 33 o
W ■£ 2
3 -o
^ o ^ °a«
* « - -g „ 2
CO OJ I- 5 X r
D S c2 ^ ^ -5
ry^ ^ ^ o
C4J < -T3 ^ a> £
c/) Cl o c_ c /5
UJ W •£ C/3 § 3
^ < E >,
2 031 ^
•e d 2
J3 -
— ul £ C
•-S ' 5 - o 3
> d Tl L- M □"
^ 00 g <D ° 4)
8 > 5 2 ■- *
^ "2 S c
cO
*9
S ^ 3 : I c =
o rri cl, o o
C —\ nO — r OX)
1 : 3 ^ s « 2
nJ . . •— r__^ C/5 ^
a> ^ x
n .y c ^ o
SP (2 <2 -3 "3
CO JD t - Ul ^ 4 ) 3
§ OQi S
SSu-ijE
■« 1 S 5 1
% c - ^ C/5
x eJ) ^ ^
a> .5 ^-g I g
> S C/5 J— !> 5
o J 2 S » s
n O w E o rl
3 = ^ < 2 -2
73 <S .^-g.
i ofl s ! s
7= _c c *- 3 fib
73
G
<5 2
o
2 2
is
= £>
i - I
: si
3 a
J J
t. C -2 S 3 y
O
E C/5 c/3
u o u u H
E ^ to 2 ■
|as>|s
1/3 ^ = g. ^ a
« s c 0 2 2
^ rp cO <4 £ O
■>. la's, t 8
M a) .2 =0 2 ■£
<Hh<>E
o
•B
3:2
<N
<
Q. «
If
CO CL
M
bb S
c —
■ 5 ®
2 0 -
E o
a 00
73
2
73
o
<
tu
Z
.x
£ g
4> CQ
X __
-4-*
o
73 -S
a> m
4) ^
>
P
*o 0
§ .£
c^ dD
0) 4)
H to
0D -*-*
o ^
g s
C^ 2 1
X x
co J2
1*3
‘ oi)
c
O X
X 5
co .E
* CL
=3
Q
0)
X
■ 5 .
00
2^2
4) O
U
CL
Ip
O c^
■s s:|
i|l
a M u
2 § 15
.2 CL S
r~ C
C/5
. «
S E
G. H
-o
c0 0
CO ’S
<D 3
^ o
CL 4 ,
OO x
X O
§i
2 i .
— 4 )
<L)
•— .—-
4) CO
_ £ t
E - x ^
3 u x
x o
C/5
P
.2 |
fO
3
3
o
4)
X
c
o
00
4)
Si
2 <D 2
a. g o
C/5 3 X
3 3 W
S ^ o
«- < • —
— 3
S *■ £
X 0
4) CO
^ 3 a
not
E o>
s
a s
3 °-
— v: <1)
o. a s
a &-S
jg <■§
' 5.43 2
C/3 C c
^■S JS
c c —
sO
DC
-i 8
$‘E
o
•d-
£ ♦
•n
DC
T3
6
c
I
fr
o
o
X)
00
c/d
W
—' cl
3 cj
c 2
<L>
£ 4
c ts
>
c
W
o
o
O
<
N -
o S
«
>
w
c
c
f
a «
z <t
o u
Z)
Z
O
So
a£
w
>
>-
U
O
-
o
Q
O
X
H
u
S
v
90
I
£
<Z5
H
Z
a
*
Q£
U
o
\c
&£)
s
00
s
C/D
0-
U
w o CO 3 \C
•- \= p • = O
Q. <U
2 00
a S
-a in
§ 2
CL CL
U U
rf O -t
.SOS
X ~ <D
a c c
3 u c
3
U-
3 •- X
a
C/5 C/5
■o
o
^ 3
CL *
U x
T3 T3
3 3
O’ cr
< <
■ i
< <
W5 O
O <N
o o
ro m
o o <u
cn cn cn
• i i
CO < u
o o o
m so i—
O o >/-*
m m m
1 §
cr _§
J ~"
o *
c/3 to
£>
2 — 5 > q
m ce 3
< 2
£ £
o u
o o
<N Tt-
l/~> KT)
ro cn
— SO O
Tf 00
v~> »/n vi
r^i n n
h £—
"O -o a.
§ § 2
O U h “
0 £) 00 -O
? m a
£ £ «
^ <D
C/5 C/5 Qf)
3 3 uT
0 0 3
o o fl.
a* o’ 12
< < o
• • in
CQ U '
o o «/n
m m co
o o o
•n If) If)
■o
o
o
s
cc
u
5
w
£ CJ
cS
u- c
^ <u
5 15
•S 3
9- x
OJ
£ 2
j'o
< C/D
< U <
o o o
— — <N
o o o
— so so
. CL
3 H
o >
CL
U
CQ
Q
CQ
a
w
X CQ
c/5 r~
<D U
CL Q-
O CQ
< 2
CN O
— 00 00 o
o o o —
00 00 00 00
•2 <
a> O
X >
■ ■
< CQ
— o
*/"5 SO
— <N
00 00
>
<L>
J
£
O
_)
<
O
>
00
T3 0)
§ I
>s 3
CJ C/D
t
_ o
CL w
2 I
O
<u -a
> i
^ 00
— m
o o
5* O
< C/D
■ •
u
Q
S
O
o
3
"O
c ^
IB g
'§ -2 O
X
cu
>
'—.
X
i. o-
» w
°-5
C/3 <
I I
< <
O SO
o o
OOOOOsOsOsOsOsOsOs
VO
I
Q
\D
oc
2 8
^ E
a
c
£•
o
o
p I
o
9
° 3
m o
— c*-,
tT —
— rf v-
. . v
^ rS 5
*2 2 >
O w -o
^ a. §
o | 2
£ 3 a
g* £ X
£ 1 '£
« W O 3
— 1 — 3 a. «i
CO C/D E •-
oo oo c9 J=
LU UJ co D
6
c
—r 0-
ed u
gs
is
o g
<
N r\
O 9
S 2
N >
02<
Q = Z
o
h
Du
C
u u
o
o
m
*a
c
s s
^ ’r 't 't
»
>1 © © © ©
SI >n in in
n n in n
S £
< *
z *
ah -
&
15
E
-
s
-0
«
0
•<—
05
"©
S
/
5
j
Q
o CJ CJ (J CJ <
— o © © © ©
2
cn — —i o •/“( */“>
Q Q a Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z
re
£
X
PJ
c>
>
3
c
<
■a E i I £
S -2 E O T3 I
«« H ^ fa « o
u CC CO — o ^
< CO u U J 2
J> >
o re:
co C/5
sO
CC
3
£*
SO
3
o
©
u.
«/~l
oo
E
U
o
Us
«
j
s-
o
u
Q
CJ
o
£
a.
"3
1£>
CQ
C
<
c-
W
a
CO
✓
0£
CL
UJ
Q
<
2
b
<
4
o
fO
cx
s
o
3
*T3
00
.6
o
g
8
o
u.
a.
X
CL
<
CL <
UJ 5
a tS
to —
l<
2 <J
u
g®
X >
sO ^
2 <
t- CJ
o3
I
8
1
CO
w.
a>
I
*o
§
o
(5
_o
3
O
> ®
o <
f- u
s-|
w >
O 5
r*i <
oo O
£
0
1
OO
S CQ
05 U
c
o- >
* >
1
*3
«n 3
0 <
— <
Q
00 U
00 cj
w
w
>-✓
g
E
I
a.
X
CL
*6
05
00
>
UJ
es <
CL
CQ
0
UJ J
a £
UJ
a
>
C/5
m —.
£ 2
cn
3
2
5
w
* <
2 cj
<
CJ
oo
>,X
a ^ eo
cd —
s C: =
•5 r- ^
_ rj- <
= r- U
ed ^
•S -5
05
■5
8 %
© o <
| > =
£ S|
_ rl <
S 00 O
o ^
U
I
«a
T3
>»
u
1-
f- >
o <
Os CJ
o
is
o3 —
cu >
o ^
vo ■2
00 <
so CJ
cd
Q5 CJ
s =
2 2
o <
r=- cj
(j
O
> CD
CO —
o y
<n <
00 CJ
s
o
z
3 <5
a s
o c o
s- - 13
.c
3
I - a
a V
Ij |
o«|
‘go
^■| 1
? « 8
f— TD
n o u
N -C
o> >» tl
■S 1 S
a •©
=3 «
3 C
§■ §
£. ~a
cl
« -
r °
^ (U
^•0*0
&C 0>
1 o
I 5
« u:
CQ
U <
CL >
(N re
00 2
o <
oo cj
« Q
25
^ I
Os ^
«: b
•S u
a <-
o
v- iw in
3 2-S «
g -3 .s -a
|§
S! E
|u
g i
E B
s -O
! s
i / wT
Rf
£ -S
4> O
00 E
c
19
« <
25
2 2
° r <
sO CJ
_ .5 13
<n “g o
_4> 3 -S
g- g -a
!=■ S
u «
e -s
U QJ
§1
O. ^
O
z
o
Z
o
Z
o o
Z Z
o
o
o
o
O-
2
<
u
TD
05
O
05
Id
s
O'
C/S C/5 c/s
£ £ £
05
c2
c/s
r* §
* i cd
• cd o
. Q iC
& &
Cl «2
C
u w
& E
c 05
I i
Cd 05
O *“
JD CJ
iS o
b ^3
O 05
g 2 2
O <u O
y C o
05
c/s
05
•5
c
’S
o C^-
flj (O
o. 8
>
o | E
•5 f §
c 5 a
«
^3 n C
C 00-^
• — f— in
o .5 ^
figs
& a.2
^ qj ti
c oi S
a -a -a
! §1
III
v. w 05 ,*b b
E c ^ .2 8
2 § =P 3 “
S' c -5 o' o
siir
%%£&
S §=5 §
U (3 r B
s
gll-
.2 jo.
R 4" E
SJ 8
> “B c
O C O I
05 05 Q.
g -O 05
o -
-rt
8^
05
<£
O'- • r-
*g c
O 05
5 ^
05
C 1/5
C 05
in
in
|
cd
1
a
s a
a
I
*0 o
ST «■§
c- w- C ^
*0—05
S1E
I El
§| E
j= g
© p J3
1
^ C o
3 8£
a §4
^ i •g .2
g^l!
S^la
s= g u ©
1 ■Rj a
11
5) 05 *o o
“fiSZ
*3 S U re:
^ > a cd
.2 ^ — 00
— o c
2f SI
*2 2 s|
$-g
•£ ^ 05
O 05 < >
« ^ ° i
E2S S
1g||
^ t D. O
- cu > ^3 rv
8W-3 S 5 i
Sl'S-o
a cl u —
•S < u a
2 JS ^ .s
04
E
u:
Q
re
05
ii
1
O 2
Ro
0 f-
i
L<§'
&g =
o 5,#.
S°<
Vr *0 .
i!i
cj UJ
« C -
•5 § I
cn b a.
in
m
< ed
CQ
. 8
• E
.JS
o
■'J-
o
0C
1
CJ
<n
oc
<N
O rf
r*', O
— m
w rS ^
•g 9 >
O .« ’g
I § J
> CO O
g* g* «
£ £ -c
C3 rrt •*=
O -
■8 ^
eo
° 2
o
— 1 ^ a.
co co P •
CO CO ed ,
UJ UJ CO
- ti¬
ed U
g2
is
£ 2
• - a>
> >
C UJ
UJ
r-
<N O
c ©
O
N ft
o 9
y 2
5 o 1
z£
11
o o
fN U-
o2<
o 5 z
•v
o
s
3 3 3 3 3
3 3
II
£1
«
c
<
-T
Tf
-r
'T
•n
-r
-f
Tf
u
u
U
u
u
U
u
u
U
U
u
V)
v>
V,
V.
o
V
V.
<N
<N
CM
rs
tT
«N
rs
o
o
o
o
o
“■>
«/*i
*0
VI
V)
PM
«r»
V,
oc
ro
ro
ro
30
ro
ro
ro
ro
ro
—
tJ-
V,
vO
O
O
O
O
Vi
NO
oc'
CM
CM
rN
cs
—
—
■*r
Tf
rf
©
oc
©
rs
'tA
U
u
>
O'
U
U
CQ
Z
00
<N
JO
E
«
3
4>
S
■O
■o
u
o
£
>
O
o
s
n
VI
5
-J
a
o U CJ u u
ZC o o c c
£ i § § s
oo Q
Z
Q Q Q
z z z
fa
UJ
c .= = cl'
S .2 | | -O 3
2 5 1 1 s jj
< CQ U U J 2
>
o “
oo oo
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston. RI 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http .//\\\\ w .ESSLaboraton com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http. i/w w \v.ESSLaborator\ com
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
5 5
* 9
O Tf
co O
— m
O O
^ S- 3
1 § I
> C/3 O
c? 6* *
oof
2 2 | j
5 £ ^ “
CO CO 1) 3
— 1 a. c/i
w c/) P •-
oo c/5 c3 3
LU UJ c/3 D
C/5
7Z
+*
4*
S
■S
>
o
OB
y
33333333
&
_/
08
C
<
lo o o o
^ 3 |*r> */■> *r>
© © ©
«r> «o <N •/■> »/i
O' © O' OO
— rg tT
_ _ _ O wS vb O
-NNNN--N
«N m **■>
22222322
a!-" —
o u u u u <
2 o o o o o
S © © © © ^
* \D © vO vO f-~
Sg
§2 =
S
3
g
K
I
a.
U
2
c
£ </->
<5 r^ ;
W m ©
^ N i-
J02
Q 9
P T3
: 8
i ‘o’
; £ c/5
5 2
o. o
■ 00 c
c
« « *-
U U Q
h
x
w
<N — (N O »n «/“>
Q Q Q Q Q Q
z z z z z z
•g E .2 |
ill 8
* §
3 - t_
^ TO TO CJ
< B (J (J J 2
E
o
\D
oo
£ ♦
£>
o
tj-
1
-C
-3
= i.
2 (3
5
Ll.
</1
oe
<N
Nt 9
s s
— C+~I
■ - CO
S £
ai "O
o
-2
I
o o |
? S? 3
2
E o
^ a
£
CO CO O
j j Q.
C/5 C/5
C/5 C/5
_T CL
^ o
c ts
o g
B 8
> >
,C UJ
£
’S
■o
o
N
«
c
<
s
>
ol‘
E
4/
«
C/5
C9
Z
0
2 . 8
5?‘E
a.
£
**
1
Fax:
♦
C/5
# cg
J
<
~l
- i
2
C/0
i
6
>V t
£ t
O
<
N r.
O D
! £■
Z a. <
U U
E
(2
Sh
O
■M
CS
f-t
o
03
*3 g
s
.0
Ifl
$|
i £
s’s
PQ
Tf
rr 9
o
m ©
9 £
•o Q
s
O
.x a.
II
£■ Eo
o o
-O X>
« « _
•-J J *Q
C/3 C/3
C/3 C/3
w w
X
£
^ Ot)
3
D- c/j
c
D
o
+J
as
?H
o
jQ
as
CD
CD
W
|
Qj
!
ttl
1
3
S
'S
.§
.5
.5
$
^3
£
■-;
s
3
«c
b
6
c
— ' CU
3 U
c 2
i
3
o
a
<
N
o 9
g 8
i 'o'
z £
c c
.— .O
O U
00
Tf o
S 2
a 12
c/>
4/
"O
4/
o
</3
c/j
03
s
X
UJ
cj u
3
«/■> in «r» w> v> <n
Myy'I'IfNV'i?
oo o o o o «o vb o’
— fNrsrsrs —i — on
22222 Sz2
cl'
CJ CJ
o o
s s
u
o
o
nC
CJ
o
©
NO
<
o
r-
-3’
r-
-J
a
o
o' <N °. ©
— 1 O V) •/-.
Q Q Q Q
z z z z
flax
fifi CJ CJ
o
X
a
U-
P P
: |
; *
m
*■ 9
O TT
m o
— m
— tj-
Q £
g. 5
E o
I 6
I
III
p ii ■fi
i
C/3 C/3 P
C/3 C/3 a
W UJ C/
6
c
■go
§2
is
11
> >
5“
S
a
cn
r-
f*3 O
§ 8 -
I'o 2 <
Q = Z
8 -5.H |
9- o
C/3
E
Z cl c^ S
_ — — c/3 c
8 8 .1 s §
UOU2a!
UJ
Ql
■w
c/3
1
4/
-C
U
GJ
# o
.2
U
c
:
C/3
—
NO
JC
Tf
X
r«*•
NO
-t
o
Tf
l
6
s
«/>
I
CJ
<
§
«/•)
x
<«■ 9
O ^
O
— m
9 I
ftj *T3
"5. §
E 2
on O
-o
U
o
•tt
U
1
Er & >«
£ £ •=
2 2 J
00^
cd cd a)
CO CO
CO CO
ssss
3 s
g«
c/i
§
’£
c/i
- i
CO
D
13
□
g
CQ
II
^|*ri IT)
OOOO
•n »/■> <n *n vi
Os •/"> sO O'
<N (N r*1 *t
— fNMMfS — — N
u u u u u
> * *
22222 Sz^
qI-
o S
o U CJ CJ CJ <
Z, © © © o ©
so vO 'O
—- 0 -
cd U
C 2
e
B
> >
e PJ
PJ c
0 s
B e
o ^
<=*
N A
o 9
g 3
1
z£
u u
(p
00
m O
8 2
N Zr
D2<
9 = *
« T 3 .g
H jj> !2
i a o
CO S ~
- CO c
g« §
5 Q a!
•o
o
o
cd
E
X.
LU
Q Q Q Q Q D
z Z Z Z Z 2
•2 § -I I
< CQ
b §
3 •=
•a «
ii >
o “
in m
B
£
sO
x
3
• u
u.
X §
P O'
= £.
a 3
s
c
o
I
U
u.
•n
00
•'d*
^ 9
O "d-
co O
— co
^d- *—
" - fe
•§ a ^
o “ ■£
•B *
I
O
CO O
O O -r
pS ItJ •£
ro
2
cd cd
— —
2 2
cd a>
■—^ ^ p
c/5 CO £
C/5 C/5 e9
UJ W C/5
d
c
' 0u
eo CJ
g2
o «
- o
> >
s I
N n
o 9
E -Si
3 sf
Z a:
c c
o o
o u
00
-d- O
8 2
o2<
d = z
ill
E g. o
co S —
~ CO C
g £ a
F 5 o
U C a.
U»|_
Ql
E
o
«
n
A
§
3
■8
<
z
u
E
£
x
a
so
oc
6
O'
<N
o
oc
2
(/)
§
CJ
•n
3C
so
-a- 9
O
C*-> O
—
^ —
9 £
0) "O
c §
C o
GO O
o o
o o
X X
X
B
00
B (0 O 3
- 1 — 3 *0. c/i
w w p .r
C/5 C/5 c5 c
W W GO
C/5
C9
0>
g
X
11 =
a
a
r-
a
a
a
i".
fN
a
a
■t-
TT
tT
U
U
U.
St
U
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
•o <n — 1/1
— fN fN <n fN —
>
3
a
<
m
22222Sz2
•p
$/
o
C/5
C*5
O <j <J CJ CJ < o
2 o o o o o 2
O ~ T ~ — ^ O
S£
£
N
s
s
p,
P=
8
_c
0.
Cj CJ
c 2
E 4
c t2
o g
-- <u
> >
C UJ
u "
o c
o
•A}
do
o
so
>>N ^
£ O 2
^ <
Q g - ^
+-> d »t3 Jd
° D. « ^
£ o-o
a E m
[/i a «
^ g
5 “ o
= — s o
U U Q cl
o
£
c c
o
o
c
o
cd
*
X
u
o o' ^ ° °
— — O »ri «/i
Q Q Q Q O
Z Z Z
so Z Z
.a e -2 g
E
I i
« j=
u u
*AJ
^ 9
o
m o
— m
.. «
~a Q ^
O « I
ja p. 3
-S 1 fc
£ ($5 O
£ £ K
O O -r
w a a
E B J
2J2
CO CO u
J J *5.
C/5 C/D g
C/5 C/5 53
LU W c/5
•3 0
12
|g
.1 |
> >
u3 “
8 1
N ~
o 9
« £
z £
11
u o
o
f^J
do
»n O
<N 2.
N ^
o £ <
'» ~c
Q — z
« -a "j
a ® S
| | o
t/5 3 —
_ c/5 e
g « 8
— j3 o
O Q a.
3 -
£
•*■*
c^
E
G>
6Q
ZJ
C/5
E
□
1
—
a
<
c
i
a.
E
£
-*
o
E
■
C/5
X
a.
185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, R1 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hUp.//tt\'u.ESSLaboraton com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax 401-461-4486 huo //«»«• ESSI ahoratorv com
Dependability . Quality . Service Dependability . Quality . Service
Page 15 of 40 Page 16 of 40
r-
9
o
m ©
— e*5
— u-
—* o>
•§ Q ^
Ou*o
j* o. §
! I 2
"> C/5 U
£ £ X
2 2 t
co co S
u- w-
O O ^
X) .O
eo co o
— 1 — 1 D. c/i
c/5 c/5 £ ■-
c/5 c/5 e3 J=
W UJ co D
M)
3
—r ft.
3 U
c 2
<U
£ «
§ S
N r\
O 9
<D
Q
<D
§ 'o'
Z £
u u
<N
ON
o
O 2 <
Q - Z
j> -b j%
a. « 3
I pj,
^ 5 *-
- c/5 6
g 2 8
gal
T3
c
3
22
II
II
>
a
<
_ _oooooo
S o o © o •/■> r* ©
o o o rp y ©
On — —- — © •/"i t*" —
--(S(NNN--N
222222 z2
ol^- M -
{/>
C8
•*-
E
S
“O
■s
o
£
©
/
/
s
5
MDL
U U U U <
° o o o o
s «
*/% o © . • •
^ - (N O ^ >0
~ q q a a a
r*i g z Z z z
o
x
PJ
.5> g .= ■= e*
£ .2 £ o -a |
< £ u 6 J
NO
3C
o
T
X
£ ♦
OC §
£ O
£■$
- £.
<N ^
V©
•* 9
O Tf
O
— m
—
3 w-
•“ a>
• • co
a £
fi
<§
C/5
£■ £ w
O O -r
« 2 «
o ^
x>
co co o
J J *5.
C/5 C/5
C/5 C/5
i
• Ou
c3 QJ
I*
& i
> >
C UJ s
8 ||
o 9 ^
a °
z £
o o
C u
a. « ’H
§ a o
C/5 § —
- C/5 C
5 « §
5 Q fll
3
C
<
II-
E
CQ
*s
C/3
08
Z
u
•o
t
E
Z
E
c.
E
-1 8
5? I
- cJ?
D.
£
£
Fax:
♦
C/5
J
<
It
6
00
TT 9
o ■'3-
o
—
tj- —
— Tf
S r\ 5
■g 9 >
o ja>
^ a §
1 M
> co O
fc* S' x
2 Si
2 2 | j
O ° 2 ■
•§ -e
_
00
U
O. c/5
CO C/5 P
c/5 co 53 e
W UJ c/5 D
co
«
s
U
©
co
co
3 S 3 S
q
CO
l|:
q
<
ol‘
S 3
U CJ
^ ^ sC V) e^5 sO
© O O rfr r*5 »o ©
— — — o ^ r- —
<N fN CN fN — — rN
■t t -t Tf
O' N
rf tJ-
22222Sz2
u u <
o o o
— 1 — r-'
a i
§
s
3
K
ps
8
> >
C BJ
W "
8 F
° I'
Q 9
z
§ 5 u S
U O
o o o ^ ^
O Q rN O O
—• r>) o «rj «/■>
Q Q Q Q Q
2 Z Z Z Z
00
a
©
<
O
<N
N
a
tj-
rn
<
<ri
o
©
CO
T3
Q
4
O
£
o
-n
C/5
a>
a.
—
td
2
E
a.
o
c
CO
a
CO
o
CO
c
E
C/5
e
S3
o
CO
O)
<D
g
o
in
“eS
c:
6
X
c
u
Q
0-
W
<
E E
« g .= .2
S .5 E | ^
t/5 U ^ tC m
>- « « J= 8
< ca u u j
sO
ic
5
£*
SO
2 .
o
©
ON
^ 9
o s
r*i O
—
•“ <D
iinl
•g 2 >
o « ■§
•*9-3
§ 3
? GO
o o
o o
X X)
GO GO
GO CO
ft ft
a
x
'£
i -
Z 00
cj 3
d>
S
■S
£
o
co
CO
Cl
c/j
1
CO
g
CO
D
"3
2
■
CO
II
y° o
«o vi «/■> <n v> v>
Os —• — — — OO'ON
«/-, — — — —• ^ *r>
c> ft v,” r^' oc
— rsr^fNrs — — —
oo
252223z2
U-lo
or
O CJ CJ CJ CJ <
2 o o o o o
o — — — — ^
- ft.
ed (J
C 2
cj ^
e «
3 X
O g
■ S u
O = Z
[S“ g 2
g c ° -
n >>N S;
® £ O 2 <
N -
a 2
■ ■ J2 -o x
a. o
£ co
co 3 ^
CO g
g « o
r= 3 <5
U Q cl
g 8
5 o*
z £
c e
U U
T3
O
CO
is
X
ft]
— c
^ ©
S a a a
- z z z
w c .= • =
*s I i s
nil 8
u eo « j=
< CQ U CJ
4> — X
E
o
o
3
1
-
X.
y.
_
SO
0C
"T
£
OC |
^ °
s©
CJ
fS
-
>
<
o
o
I
bu
*r»
00
fn
O
■M
cd
fn
O
x
cd
<!
PQ
8 <i
1 3
q B
It
||
*3
£'s
00
^ 9
O 'd'
CO O
— ro
Tf -
! Q $
6
^ & 3
o ! 2
£ & o
fc- & *
O O -P
n n 3
O O
X X
eo ed
X
<u
a
co co £
co co S
ft] ft] GO
ft
o
■ft
cd
ft
o
cd
c n
CD
W
y
•s
1
I
I
g
s,
o
c
.0
.8
.s
=
f-.
3
p:
s
—r °-
eo CJ
§2
is
o £
.6 a>
> >
c ft]
8 |
5*
N
<N
Tf
ON
oo o
O ^
<N X
N X
a —
o b± -
<
Q = Z
g 8
3 o*
z £
c c
CJ o
0 u
i> -T3 X
E £■ o
co E co
co 3 —
- co c
o s
X Cd
U D
CJ y
^2
H-
o|
£
CO
i
-s
U
ed
*K
CO
U
E
£
±
«N
St
CO
a.
so
oo
Tj-
&
6
2
i
u
o
L
N r<
O 9
to
©
a 2 <
Q = z
111
E O. o
e3 E
C/3
e9 O
Z £
«- *- <- C/3
6 8 8 s
U U U Q
5
"O
o
C
<
*r>
o
o
m
"O
c
O
2
b
x
W
ssssssss
U u u u
CJ U U U CJ
£
u
Us
*r»
o o o o o o
in m rs iti '/'i
©\Os©vOsO<N»£«£>
f*7 — — — — rf o O
— .J — — — w-i be O'
fS<NrM<N«N — — —
22222 Sz^
bale
or
y y y
§ § §
O O fS o
a a a
z z z
.b E •= E b =
M 4 n 111
U 93 « -C ^ ,2 O ■=
<caUUJZoooo
E
?
o
«
i
to
C/3
/
—j
sO
x
3
§
X
93
U_
o
»/■)
OC
*■ 9
8 S
— r^i
rf —
— tt
_ "O
•§.§
8 o
•8 9 £
6 -
-*
—
1 £ o
S' g* X
O O r
S 2 3
2
<3 5
x> ^
CO o
C/3 C/3
C/3 C/3
I
P-»
73 u
g2
if
8 g
.B 8
> >
8 I
<* .
ggO-
- O T3
2 8 C.—
i o' i g-
i Cl. c/3
— — — C/3
g.g | g
Cuuo
©
©
<N z
N S:
O —
E
CJ
J=
u
f y
*5
y
?Z
oh
Q.
£
E
C/3
j
<
z
■g
—
O
I
s
1
E
X
5 »
z I
2 3
c « o*
E
£
<0.0.
sO
90
O'
©
2
to
|
CJ
y".
x
o
rf i
O
O
—
o
■o S >
O »■“
^ a §
| I .fc
£ g* X
o o •£
2 2 a
2
o o
•o £
Q CO <u
J J -Q.
C/5 C/5 P
C/5 C/5 3
LU UJ C/5
“
N)
3
6
c
- Ou
3 U
£2
E
1 ts
>
UJ _
§ s
>,N
£ o
o 9 9
.. u -a 42
u 8 a » S
£ 'o’ E S- o
« S 3
Zo-ooa.-
4- - - C/3 C
C C c u ^
<L) O O 3 ££
— — — ^ aj
U U U O cl.
s s s s s s s
a
TJ
C
N
"cB
C
<
o o o
o o o
•/“) «/■)•/“) */-i */“i fN «/1 */~i
eg cC 'C ^
— — <N
. . . . % *
^ ^ ^ ^ >
a§
u u u u
o o o o
§ 8 S S
<
o
r-
-d-
©
<
o
o
-d
o
2
c
o
y
3
d
K
UJ
O
■M
cC
o
ja
3
►J
<1
.§1
■| s
ii
si
■c ^
fi, s
PQ
Tf I
0 S
o
— m
•8 Q £
6 « -g
| ! £
g* g* X
O O -r
113
3 3 0
-> J O.
C/5 C/5 P
C/5 C/5 S3
W PJ C/5
6
c
«• CL
3 CJ
£2
is
o w
• - o
> >
s I
o9
o
o —
oS<
8 .8'
3 O'
Jj *-
Z ft.
c c
o o
O U
C/3
3
C
<
in
LU
UJ_
0\
£
C/5
E
SJ
JZ
U
13
*5
y
U
E
£
o.
E
cc
C/5
X
->
51
-
5
\D
x.
&
©
8.
2
c
o
I
CJ
<S
-
IA
8
£
X
-
o
Cc
'M
o
X
CS
5
fj
It s
■§ 8 "
.S-5
K
pa
Tf I
o
ro o
—
O
-1
g «
> on
o o
as ca
i— b>
o o
X) X
9 ca
-3 X
on co
co co
UJ UJ
^ 00
^ 3
O. c/j
« ' 2
co !D
2
c
6
E
s
p
’>
c
UJ
O
6
O
<
N
a
z
c
u
CL
U
2
; <
: z
■*- w -a 42
a - o 73
D Q-— •"
*r? E 9- *
on
~ co
§ «
x ca
U Q
o
CO
<1
T
T
■n
’T
~r
U
U
u
XL
u
oc
u
u
u
U
u
U
u
o
jo
*ps
•pi
•n
o
v%
•p>
PM
PM
PM
PM
rr
PM
PM
o
o
O
o
o
V)
«r>
*n
V)
PM
*o
VI
PM
>r,
PM
PM
«N
PM
o
PM
rsj
PM
PM
PM
PM
V©
CP
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
—
—
PM
rf
Tt
■'t
Tf
■^T
Tt
Ov
5^-
r-
p'-
oc
r-
o:
U
>
OC
U.
iZ
bi
cd
z
U
y§
Or
CJ O CJ O < 0 U
c o o o o z. ©
O O © © TT ® O
VO v© v© v© t-* V©
© © ©
CN PM
i n n
PM © ©
Q Q a
z z z
<
vs
o
o
ro
T3
O
<L>
2
O
ca
fa
S
UJ
||
bi
n
IS
S|
S*
<
pp
•
O -O'
m o
— m
.. v
^ n 5
•g S >
(5 o -o
.* a. 3
112
£ £ a
e> i<
O O •£
ca ca ■s
E 6 J
ca ca w
^ J a.
co on P
co co B
UJ UJ on
o
■M
cd
Vh
o
cd
h-3
c/3
C/3
W
■s
I
8
!
Uj
■§
48
.u
£
c
.0
.55
XI =
u
UJ
8
a
<
SJ
O
u
i
to
Z
|
O
Cl
□
I
c
« ^
uj _ S
§ 5 2
>> N ^
U _ <
^ -C
Q = Z
^ o -o J5
8 G. « ^
o' £ £■ S
u « E ^
2_ on ca —
— — CO c
g g w g
- C X »J
U U O cl
185 Frances Avenue. Cranston. Ri 02910-2211 Tel 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 httn hww uLSS Laboratory com 185 Frances Avenue, Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Tel: 401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htlp./Aws \v. ESS Laboratory com
Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service
c
— r o-
co Qj
C ^
<D
£ «
c C
2 S
■ - (D
> >
5“
O
U »
o >
<=*
N o
o S
6 ■-
a S
z £
u u
N ^
02<
D = z
« -o .2
o. « 5
£0.0
ed E c/2
c/5 cd ■*-
~ c/5 g
5 « 2
- « oj
U Q ou
C/5
«
S
5
«
o
O
m
T3
O
•5
<u
co
£
X
W
S 3
o o o
y >n IT) <n T)
_ o o o
*r> <N •/■> •/■>
- fS <N N N
rn <N <N <N <N
<N<N<N<NCN
rf SO r^-
° — <N
<6 6s <n
— — <N
222222^2
M§-
Q|cn
u <_> o <j <
o o o o o
© © o o
VO vO SO V© l'-
<N <N 2
V) —;
<n vi
g 3
a a o
Z Z Z
so
96
~r
tj-
o
§ 2
-i -3
O
rf
X
£ ♦
^ i
° S
co o
— r^i
a. 5
c o
a) a; >
■o Q ?
O ~o
•g
Iss
& & x
o o -P
P 3 ? CO
2
o o
X> -O
CO CO
_) J
a>
o.
C/5 C/5 £
C/5 C/5 c3
UJ P-1 C/5
• a.
ed O
§2
Is
I 1
> >
c UJ
w r-
o
C
a
<
a h
it
a £?
Z o.
C C
t> o
C u
Q 9
N ^
a ^ <
*2 z
o *T3 jq
*a.^> —
| o-o
C/5 53 «-
- C/5 C
8 « g
U D a!
U-1 _
Ql
£
•w
c/5
"e
o
u
sO
00
j? g
-ic8
o
X
<a
U-
00
r-
\o
-r
©
I
p.
X
9
8
< s
r}- .
O rj-
co ©
— co
■o D 5t
O o -o
* g. 3
lit
g* g* *
2 2 ! j
_o .§ S 'Si
R C5 O 3
J J Q. tfl
C/D C/D P -P
c/d on e3 J=
ca
—
qj
2
■3
O
c/D
c /5
a
T
-r
-tr
T
O’
Z
Z
Z
cj
CJ
U
o
U
u
u
CJ
•/•,
V,
•z-.
Vl
V.
©
sn
If,
rN
<N
rs
<N
rs
Tt
fN
CM
o
©
©
©
©
©
©
©
•f~.
*o
•o
•o
fN
•O
V>
_
CO
S
3
co
ro
to
CO
fN
to
<N
fN
r-g
rs
CM
fS
fN
fN
Tt
rt
O’
Tt
X
O'
^ ^ ^ sz ^
UJc
or
CJ CJ CJ CJ < o
c c o © o 2
1 1 1 •" — t'' o
o o o o rr r-
s£) v£> vO VO r^-
£0
g
§
N
—r fl¬
ed U
: 2
5
E „
P I
0 )
>
W
>
Tf
Sa a
a>
D.
a>
- <
- Z
9- o
C/D
z £ a ~
— — t« c
I! g » s
6 c c q I
T3
O
■5
X
UJ
£ ™ P ©
w<N — — ©«/-> —
I!!: Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z
| E .5 |
S .2 E i
«/S U. "T3 i_
<- « ro _c
< CO o CJ
O — JZ,
^ flj ■ —
Z C/2 C/5
E
0
■
a
CL
SO
X
(0
u.
o
TT
£•
Z
©
oo
c <
z z
^ I
O
ro ©
— ro
- fc
9 I
o "O
& 3
£ o
ts
■—
O
JX
—
.O -
£ £ o
g* g* X
o o —
H W 3
i
o ^
JO ^
— J "S
C/D C/D
C/D C/D
E
CJ
U.|_
Ql
Cl
C/D
£
n
Limit
z
3 £
Os ^
C/5
E
X
< 2-
z |
.2*2
£- o
E C/5
“ g
S 2
E
£
_
E
vO
30
£•
o
N
©
oc
c
2
=
£
o
_z
—
#
o
-O
2
(0
O
c
o
u
(D
3
O'
' Q-
a u
Ms
>
UJ
c
a
=T
O
<
N ~
o S
a o
Z £
u u
u M
uj &
Hi
II
I s
rN fM CM CM
CM CM CM
???????
j in m o R p o
oj JO oj 2 2 011/1
§§§§§§§
8S8
o o o o o o p
o o in o o o in
in in cm in in o cm
cm cm *h cm cm in »-<
co 8 § 8 8 § §
o o o o o
o p p p p o p
o q in o o o in
in in cm in m o cm
N CM H IN CM Ul rH
S* S* S 1 s* s* s* s* ■ S* S* S* S* S 1 s* s*
o p
8 nj
CM CM in
e'g§E§-ogfc
« Jl L tl ^<T3 — >
5<Suu^jinin
p p
o in
in cm
H W N (!) O' O CTi
in in cm in n T-t cm
CM IN rl CM IN in rl
3 ! IS
x x
O I
B C
-I <
6 I
S 3
| H I S
5 X X oi
= ^
J5 <L>
co z
s
8
E
o
1
-
I
-
_
&
o
II
1 if
«c ^
g-5
•C ^
K 'S
PQ
o ti-
O
— m
2 t-
.. c5
1 Q £
) <u
: §
i £ p
■ rn
■ c/5 U
ill
! I s
s ra o>
) J a
) c/5 £
> c/5 c9
] LU c/5
d
c
' CL
c& CJ
§2
I e
o «
.a a5
> >
c uj
W c
o E
S F
o ^
N ri
o 9
g 8
i o'
Z eu
c c
N ^
a 2 <
Q = Z
u u
es uj
c uj
U»|_
Ol
E
o
# C-j
C/3
a.
E
a
E
nC
oo
&
o
§
u-
Sh
O
3
Tf l
O T
CO O
— co
2 £
0)
o. §
g o
& e* x
2£ fc
2 2 | j
x .2
a eg u
J J 75
so
Cl c/i
S I
• CL
u
O 5
ts
V
o
> —
w rr -
g S 2
>, N ^
^02<
qQ- z
;ijB.||§
i ’o* § ^
& C/5
~ ~ C/5 C
: 8 | 2 8
' G C Q a
9- o
C /5
T3
O
JS
ca
E
X
LU
3 3 3 3 3
a 3
r-~ r~
a
a
"O
o
N
t
*t
'T
rf
■t
•t
-t
•t
2
S*
\£
LC
u
\jL
•u
CJ
cj
Cj
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
v,
V.
r
rs
rs
CM
rM
t
rM
rM
©
O
O
o
O
O
O
h
<o
«o
*o
«/->
rM
«n
•o
_
ro
r*->
ro
s
5
ro
m
fO
ro
ro
rM
r*-,
rsi
cm
rM
rM
rM
rM
rM
rM
rM
*t
't
't
't
Tf
T
f
oc
O'
^5
U
U.
u
U
>
QC
LC
U
u
05
z
tfclo
or
C /5
C /5
£
+£
£
C /5
!/5
3
c
6/5
s
u
LU
C /5
D
08
•4m
QJ
Z
■o
■8
o
£
cJ
>5
O
w
M
I 1
5
j
a
s
f>
2 «
CJ CJ CJ < 0
c o o o 2
~ ~ f"' o
© © ✓-» o
Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z
•g E -2 I
I •! i !
< n o <j
>
o ~
00 CO
E
g
3
i
-
cO
=c
a
CL
SO
00
-r
&
©
Tt I
0 ^
ro O
— ro
■*t —
~ - s
Id I
5 u -a
.* a §
£ 5 O
£ £ X
O O ■£
2 1 1
2 2^
co ca o
J J O.
C /5 C /5 P
C /5 C /5 c 3
(XJ tXJ e/*
12
£ *
«/">
fN
2 IS?
3 * o = <
§2 9
~ z
« T3 Z
z £ J
c c c
o o t>
u C 0
^ “
z s
& O
E c/5
5/3 g
4/
I F
ep «,
■
c
Q e:
<
±
c.
E
o
o
eo
«
CL
V©
X
3
- 8
£*
O
£
o
—
I
o
x>
2
(0
Q
c
o
u
re
3
O'
' Ou
cd (J
C 2
O g
«u
> >
n w
W c
o 9
o
01
U U
O K)
LU £?
II
«3
t 8
S' 3* 5* 3 1 S' S' 3*
in °. in °. o o o
^ !G ^ 2 2 ^ ^
;a n s s a s
S8S88SS §888888
8 S §
0000000
0000000 .
S S S S S § si 88S888
in in -h in in in ■ 1 — — - -■
I S* 5 1 S’ S’ S* S’ S’ | g 1 ? 5 ? 3 ? S'
S g
s I
JS6
5 5
in in
in in in in n n
in in in nh rsj
fN t-I rg cm m *-•
« c -O
all s s
s E B -a S to 5
co u u .3 $ in
J= -
JS <u
to z
8
8
yi
-X
■
CL
VO
OO
£
o
TT
- 1L
s £
*/i
oc
't I
O Tt
co o
— m
•S g £
o i ■§
9- 3
p
*—
^ co O
x
O O r
c3 ca -5
W. L- W
3
<u
J J o,
CO CO P
co co S3
UJ UJ co
—r °-
w CJ
g^
c
a ^
N rs
a 9
N -r
O 2 <
g 8
MJ
Z a.
c c
U U
cb UJ
C UJ
<
bL
Ql
E
4 /
«
^2
U
a
CO
0.
vC
OC
s.
.§•
6
2
C/3
9
u
>
cc
H
Cfl
i
UJ
X
U
-b
<
<
J
c£
o
X
r
no
o
p .£
: |
}&
V~)
oo
00
C
<
•o
•o
|m
O
c
I
o
co
S
I
C/3
C/3
UJ
CD
c
o
c
c
£
rc
s
■*->
o
* y
. u u u
w r 1 O O O
o O' r- nO
h- h vO iri in
o u u u u u ^
000000 ^
rf m (N —« On vO
in iri m m 'f rr
» O.
« CJ
52
.11
> >
l5 “
8 1
oG
s 8
1 o’
—T l—
Z CL
c c
o o
C u
R (Q (0 Cd (0
w« w w w
OOOOO
CO CO (0 CO CO
2 * * * *
c c c c c
CO CO CO CO CO CO «.
U U U hi u !£
O O O O O O c/5
* *
CO CO
* *
c c
????***?** o
h.h-k.h.h.h.h-1-h-h.u.
3 3 3 3
C/5 C/5 </5
- OO
CQ <A C/5 </i C/5 C/5
E-g
E E
E
E E
£
E
E
E
£
I —
X
I X
*T*
r
X
X
X
c. 0 .
*s.
CL CL
* 0 .
0 .
CL
CL
CL
C/5 C/5
C/5
C/5 C/5
C/5
c/J
C/5
C/5
C/5
3 3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
c c
0
O C
B
i
C
B
E
0 0
D
O O
O
O
O
B
B
3 3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
cr a-
c
cr c
a-
cr
cr
cr
CT
< <
<
< <
<
<
<
<
<
J=
00 L—
T3
3
JO
CO
o' 0
sO
NO O
vO
vO
nO
nO
CL C
J
Q
e
o
D-
O
DC
Cl
o
Q
Q
O
2
o .
>
|
co
co
o
*
C
UJ
-
b
u
—
LU
Q
H
O
z
3 0^0
8 1*ls
00
c
*C
3
I
§
■H §
c )7
73
“ g>t5
| £
_ j3 O
o o e3
| 82
s >,u
C/5 -3 T
ft 2 on
w 5u
op ^ o
t 3jS
O 5 S O
o.<~ V- c
p O O O
.s -
C/5 • —
§ 50
" V
C O
° 8 .«.*
0,6 £ E
SS33 §
8-0 g 9 8| _
— Isflil g a,
3 O 0 O *> 3 J i E
o a- Q £ OO c |s
~ 73
8 .a
-H 9
* p
t/j c
>■■8 -S -8 ?
« = = = <3
S 3 g 8-3
T3 O O O •£
O O O •- O
00 00 30 3 C£
*3 rt § § O O
C/3 DC Cd DC O' Z
t:
a
fi
T?
a
CO
o
8
S CO
1 2
JO c
■3 c
3!
- a | * oS -j> £
NNNNNNNNNNNCCZ-OQCZZ jj U.
>* 5c
«OT — fSW<Z LL.C/3
ft
■
0 -
vO
00
©
O'
CN
O
5
u_
»/7
30
CQ —
•u. °
C o
0) O.
E o'
ID Q.
& o
< fj)
<s
o
o
oc
B
CO
D-
8*0/92/01
Iduwtf )U9tQ (*ajpA) Z XdcQ sn 1
■9uiiijm ui Xpoisir)jo UIFq^) 03 saSueip |[t xy xstxj f j
V HA WVO d3CIVI\ M‘! M »u*pjooD* ui
psi03||OD aio* »|duiK saSp^MOinpi )U3ip 'OM-VK »uipip Ag,
— 1 —
30ITJL/3JEQ
(airueoSi^) iXq poApo^y
~r
3UJIX/PJ ZQ
c?CXo I tybl/V
JUJUPJXQ
' U/
(ajhjr09;5) :Xo pa^JJ^
Q:o /1 MUl!
hirfSUU 3 '*® 1 ,
vjj^n
— r
3iuijyo3E(;
(ajnigu2|5) :Xq p^Ara^ojj
“T
PUJlJjO]g(J
(3j meu3i bu l
QfV 1 H
ouiix/oiec
tf
/pjuiBu9fs) ^Xjj^Aixwry
/(kziy^yAi
aunjywEQ
^HHrlraiig) :Xq psqsmbuijyy
aupUUKQ
:Xq pajduiBS
"6 ‘^V^Z -8 ‘PPV i}<\3o*V 'L ‘HOW -9 *H0*N S H ONH -* 'WH € 'IDH -Z ‘dN M 3 P°3 uoinsAWsay Xjuq *fl I*“» u I
S1 «pj-d » d 'A&-/» POO 8u PI u Pa-/fca "^S-dCiS j;ut Av P“ no, 0-/5CvD ra*A wstjji-y 5 (uJtv ’Spnis-a P!l°s-as P°S-S :XUJ, W VOA-A =I u31 S-S'^fo-0 X [°d-<I wHxrauiwuos
1
VK °N
°N"
°A
iDtauj s[w$
JU0S3JJ J3J002)
y
x
J
"F
A
H/^/H
n
4
/>
(kzv
/|
sp
€1
1
T
T
7
/
.
“TT/r
1
z/
V
c/
>//
7
umr
/l
MCP- MCP METALS (13)
METALS (13) w/Hg
i
a>
i
Q
S
5
vS
*s3
Cu
UI
«2 00
< K)
83
k Q
I|
?-
3? o
t o°
38
|s
I"
SI
tl
Is
8100 8015
TPH DRO
S 00
IP o
s *°
a oo
SS
!i
8260 624 524.2
VOA
Type of Containers
Number of Containers
1-2
(js^i jo jwq oz) uouroynuapi a|duiB5
^
1
o
5
(X
8
2
3UJ LL
uonoago^)
aigQ
# a|duicg
avi SS3
£v
r w i />y?
fe^ppy pfurg
ouoqdapx
#Od <J|Z ains / ' «!3
3 W5^sr
ifkiaj lorafio^)
(S=l «> 02) aurefsj loafojj
n&mo
# i»foJ d
vzv
3U^N °3
sisXpuy paJinbog oiu^jo/pur apj ;3
I-.at TO
ai .ioafoiJd ava ssh
»A
^[qcwAipQ omonoajg
sinurj 3unJodyy
sSej
ia TO
AQOiSnD do
•JuiA\ 0 || 0 j aqj jo Xire joj
" “MHD 3W AN fN HN 15
:ujojj parojjoo aja/v\ sojourn a
" # p3i;nb3J si XjoaBJoqBj Xq r
98^-W (IOH I8IZ'I9£ (IOfr) PL
UZZ-01GZ0 m ‘uoisuEj^ ‘snusAy ssduejj $81
■JUf ‘2uU33Ut2ug l/3S]3tq_lJo UOtSMtQ
XjcaEJoqirj §§3
3 KV9ZAK
jdixwy (MOjpA) £ Xdoo 9*1 ( M !9/Hv) I
-8upuM ui Xpoisn^ jo uibiq oj o8oeip jp xej aseajj
V IIA WVD J30VW VF* wuepaoaw ui
pr>3[[CO 3 jom »|duiK saSpapvoujpE auarp ‘<£)WVW 8uipip Xg*
I
auitjyaotQ
(ainaeuSij) :Xq paAiaoo^j
1-
axuijL/aiEQ
oCwIM^'l"
auit_L/»*a
^P^aTaXT"
(ainiBuSig) :Xq poApoa^j
prro™
(ajnrcuSis) :Xq pausmbuii
\
aiUIJjQltQ
- / 3im r /arerr 1
(a»<UBu3i^f:Xqj)a<JsmbuipvJ«^ 'auiijyaiTQ
^ *Cvy^7
'jpi
(3jiubu3;5) :X<
I
9UIIJ79|gQ
cos*W&At
aunjyMEQ
(saniEuaijj-Xq paijSTnboTjyg
/ <rj >) I £ dai3 l J *I°°D
»a idoiuj spas
luasarj jajoo^
^>1/ pj|dua’3
°3
-6 ‘«V“Z '8 'pay orqjosy -A ‘HCWi '9 ‘HO'N 'S ‘‘ONH ‘S’ ‘’OS'!-! “€ ‘10H "Z ‘dN -I S P°3 oone^iasajj
■sutpiuipsx[ ]
_dT B p W -f-1
A|LQ [BUJ3)U[
- .'VN ON
°N
«W|H-d » d !A\-/A 110-0 JilE Ai Su Pt l 'Pa-Ava P unaj O-AO 53p n lS-a pn°s-as P°S-S :»n*W
VOA-A S|!“1S-S S^IO-O x l°d d adXxiaunauoQ
X
1]
-ty 0^9"
w
0/
/0
l
11 ZgSg-l
4>
1
$0CZ-<D
TW>
1 &RZ.V
~^SV
L
T ^CZ9
~imo
1
JJCZ9
~7m>
L
hcczv
~m)
—
T~
L
k(XZV
,
S&-0
€
1
^ ' 'tcczv
T
3W
z
/
V
ii
:F /(fcz? *
o
^<y
~Ww
T
•«
o
|5
$
l|
u
§
1 1
o3 ^
Q ^
3S
J 5
11
fi
Si
* KJ
Is
si
M
N
°°
3i
§1
3 oo
ss
jl
1* G
c 00 ♦» 2
% s
f ?
e I- £
o :
<A t
to w
to
P J (»»i» *»»o (K) uoueoyouapj ajduir^
r ----
j i
8
i
»onx
UOU33]|Cr)
»«a
# o]dtu*$
8V1SS3
Lx - b^Jppv [i/urg
# *®d u auoqdapi
^v''rrTJ4*£„
uXsk» ( j ioeiutr)
(***i" >«D OO »uir M i»(ojj
wcs/urie
#«>foy
3UK N <0
swXpuy pal in bay aiu^jo/pue apiQ
°n ~yi »a
h°£)i h 1
ai IDHfOHd AVI SS3
" J^MK) 7T dad «»>v/T P 30 ^ :ieuuo d
VI d^uxupQ };uQi»9{3
'e-si&y
tiiuir] 9uaiod?g
:3uumo]]oj aqi jo Xui
wqiQ
' g puinbaa %i Xjcuuoq»[
J3 MK)
HW AN fN HN
UIOJJ p03|J03 ii3A6
j3>fjg >
»(duiw
^ J ° /
s3ej
AaOASQD dO
•sX*p ^ ueip jj
>mg «u»il
UI03 XJOJ«J oq^|SS3 AVAVM
98^^19^ (IOIe) I8IZ-I9^ (10^) PI
\IZZ 0\GZ0 IH ‘uojsuej3 ‘snu3Ay ssduejj 58i
■JUT ‘%UU33Ut2u'J U3S131U I fo UOtSMtTJ
XjojBdoqej SS g
Page 39 o>40 ■ p age 40 of 40
APPENDIX G
K TEST DATA
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING
WYNN EVERETT
JANUARY 23, 2015
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Well #
Static Water Level (ft)
(equilibrium before purging)
Stabilized Water Level (ft)
(equilibrium during purging)
Volume Purged (gal)
Purging Time (min)
Total Well Depth (ft)
Screen Length (ft) 1
Intake Length (ft)
(screen exposed to water column)
Screen Diameter (in)
BOR-109-3 (1)
10 54
1060
007
1
17.40
10
686
2
BQR-109-3 (2)
1054
1071
0.15
1
1740
10
686
2
BQR-109-3 (3)
1054
10 82
0.21
1
17 40
10
6.86
2
CES 2-1 (1)
883
15.54
0.01
1
17.15
10
8.32
2
CES 2-1 (2)
883
16 02
0.03
1
17.15
10
8.32
2
CES 2-1 (3)
883
1634
004
1
17.15
10
8.32
2
CES 2-2(1)
11.23
13.32
002
1
1695
10
5.72
2
CES 2-2 (2)
11 23
13 48
004
1
16.95
10
5.72
2
Ices 2-2 (3)
11 23
13 68
007
1
16 95
10
5.72
2
FIELD MEASUREMENTS CONVERTED TO METRIC UNITS (for k h calculation)
IWell #
Static Water Level (cm)
(equilibrium before purging)
Stabilized Water Level (cm)
(equilibrium during purging)
Volume Purged (cm A 3)
Purging Time (sec)
Intake Length (cm)
Screen Diameter (cm)
BOR-109-3 (1)
321.3
323 1
2498
60
209 1
5.08
BOR-109-3 (2)
321.3
3264
5489
60
209.1
5.08
BOR-109-3 (3)
321.3
3298
798.7
60
209.1
5.08
Ices 2-1 (i)
269 1
473.7
49.2
60
253.6
508
Ices 2-1 ( 2 >
269 1
488 3
98.4
60
253.6
5.08
llcES 2-1 (3)
269 1
4980
147.6
60
253.6
5.08
CES 2-2(1)
342.3
4060
75.7
60
174.3
5.08
Ices 2-2 ( 2 )
342.3
410 9
151.4
60
174.3
5.08
Ices 2-2 (3)
342.3
417.0
276.3
60
174.3
508
NOTES
1
2
3
4
Intake Length = (Total Well Depth) - (Static Water Level), unless this value is greater than the length of the screen.
Thl constart < head < equation for a well point-filter in uniform soil was used to calculate horizontal conductivity of ground: K h = [q * ln[(mL)/D + V(1 + [(mL)/D] A 2)]] / (2 * it * L *
The constant head equation for a well point-filter in uniformsoil at an impervious boundary was used to calculate horizontal conductivity of ground: K h = [q * ln[(2mL)/D + \(1
H c ).
+ [(2mL)/D] A 2)]] / (2
* TT *
L * H c )
APPENDIX H
SITE SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
1. CLIENT/SITE/PROJECT INFORMATION
Client: Wynn MA, LLC
Site Address: 1 Horizon Way, Everett, Massachusetts
Site Description, Work Environment:
The Site includes approximately 25 acres of land within the City of Everett. The southern end of the Site (referred to as the peninsula)
extends into the Mystic River; however, all activities under this HASP will be undertaken on land. The ground surface at the Site is generally
bituminous pavement (center), unpaved, or compacted coarse gravel. The ground surface at the Site is generally flat with a gentle slope
toward the southwest. Access to the Site is limited by the presence of a chain-link fence with two gates; one gate is in the eastern portion of
the Site, along Horizon Way, while the second gate is located on the northern portion of the Site, across an extension of Horizon Way.
Investigations conducted between 1995 and the present have identified several contaminants in soil, groundwater, and sediments at the
Site, as further discussed below. The sources of contamination at the Site include past industrial operations, leakage from a former
aboveground storage tank (AST), and the placement of contaminated fill. According to historic reports, the Site was occupied by the
Cochran Chemical Company, the Merrimac Chemical Company and the Monsanto Chemical Company from the late 1800s until the late
1960s. The buildings on the land-side portion of the Site were razed in the 1970s. The land-side portion of the Site has been used primarily
as a material storage and staging yard since the mid-1990s, when rock and fine-grained sediment ("tunnel muck") from the construction of
the Deer Island Outfall was stockpiled on it in a 1- to 7-foot thick layer. There are currently no buildings at the Site.
This HASP applies to three areas where remediation will be undertaken:
A-5 Area: The A-5 area is situated in the northern portion of the Site in the vicinity of previous exploration location A-5, where elevated
concentrations of lead and arsenic were detected in soil. No specific source for the elevated arsenic and lead levels has been identified, and
the impacts appear to be random and related to fill material. Groundwater samples collected from this area have not indicated
concentrations of metals above the applicable MCP Standards. Soil from the top 8' of this area will be excavated, characterized, treated on¬
site as needed, and disposed of off-Site, and the excavation will be backfilled to existing grades.
CES-2 Area : The CES-2 area is situated in the northern portion of the peninsula, in the vicinity of previous exploration CES-2. Arsenic has
been detected in both soil and groundwater in this area. The highest concentration of arsenic in soil was observed in CES-2-3, while the
maximum dissolved concentration of arsenic was detected in a groundwater sample from CES-2-2. Unlike the Low pH area (see below), soil
and groundwater pH levels in the CES-2 area are relatively neutral. Soil from 6-15' below grade in this area will be excavated, characterized,
treated on-site as needed, and disposed of off-Site, and the excavation will be backfilled to existing grades. The excavation will require the
installation of sheeting, and will also require dewatering.
Low pH Area : The Low pH Area includes the southern corner of the peninsula where the pH has been measured to be at or below 4, with the
lowest levels detected at the southern end in SHORE-9 (pH of 1.63). Dissolved arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel and zinc, along with
total cyanide, have been detected above the applicable MCP Standard. As indicated in the Phase III RAP, a plot of dissolved lead
concentrations against pH indicates a strong correlation between pH below 4 and dissolved lead concentrations above the UCL.
Remediation in this area includes the installation of sheeting; the excavation and temporary stockpiling of overburden material; in-situ
solidification/stabilization (ISS) of soils from approximately 4-15' below grade using Portland cement; and the restoration of existing grades.
GZA has prepared this plan solely for the purpose of protecting the health and safety of GZA employees. Subcontractors, visitors, and others
at the site must refer to their organization's health and safety program or site-specific HASP for their protection. Subcontractor employees
may use this plan for general informational purposes only. Subcontractor firms are obligated to comply with safety regulations applicable to
their work, and understand this plan covers GZA activities only.
Job/Project#: 171521.10
Estimated Start Date: 4/1/15
Estimated Finish Date: 8/1/15
Site is Covered by the Following Regulations:
OSHA HAZWOPER Standard [X]
Mine Safety and Health Administration Q
OSHA Construction Regulations ^
None of these Q
2. EMERGENCY INFORMATION
Hospital Name: Massachusetts General Hospital
Hospital#: 617-726-2000
Hospital Address: 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114
Directions and Street Map Attached: X Yes
Local Fire #: 911
Local Ambulance #: 911
Local Police #: 911
WorkCare Incident Intervention Services:
For non-emergencies, if an employee becomes hurt or sick call 888-449-7787
Other Emergency Contact(s): GZA
GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Phone tf s: 781-278-3700
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13) Page 1
Project:
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
Site-Specific Emergency Preparedness/Response Procedures/Concerns:
The Site is fenced. Potential emergencies on-Site include physical injuries (particularly heavy-equipment/excavation related) and the potential
for heart attacks and heat stroke (during hot weather) and hypothermia (during cold weather). In the case of an emergency call 911 or reference
the attached map and directions to the hospital. Personnel on site will have current first aid and CPR training and will be able to respond to
minor injuries and potential heart attacks while emergency response personnel are contacted for assistance.
. All EHS Events (incidents, first aid, near misses, unsafe acts/conditions, fires, chemical spills, property damage, extraordinarily safe
behaviors) must be reported immediately to the Project Manager, and within 24 hours to the EHS Event Reporting Portal at
www.kelleronline.com/portal . Username gempll; Password 4lncidents!.
. In the event of a chemical release greater than 5 gallons, site personnel will evacuate the affected area and relocate to an upwind location.
The GZA Field Safety Officer and client site representative shall be contacted immediately.
. Site work shall not be conducted during severe weather, including high winds, blizzard conditions, and lightning. In the event of severe
weather, stop work, lower any equipment (drill rigs), and evacuate the affected area.
3. SUB-SURFACE WORK, UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION
Will subsurface explorations be conducted as part of this work? ^ Yes Q No
Site property ownership where underground explorations will be conducted: Wynn,
MA LLC
Public Access Property Q Yes ^ No
Private Property ^ Yes Q No
Have Necessary Underground Utility Notifications for Subsurface Work Been Made?
] Yes [K] Yet to be conducted
Specify Clearance Date & Time, Dig Safe Clearance I.D. #, And Other Relevant Information: TBD
IMPORTANT! For subsurface work, prior to the initiation of ground penetrating activities, GZA personnel to assess whether the underground
utility clearance (UUC) process has been completed in an manner that appears acceptable, based on participation/ confirmation by other
responsible parties (utility companies, subcontractor, client, owner, etc.), for the following:
Electric:
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Fuel (gas, petroleum, steam):
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Communication:
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Water:
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Sewer:
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Other:
□
Yes
□
No
□
NA
□
Other
Comments: Subsurface utility notifications to be made by remediation contractor prior to mobilization.
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 2
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
4. SCOPE OF WORK
Any OSHA PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE entry?
□ YES X N0
If ves. use Site Specific H&S Plan/Confined Space Entrv Permit for that
portion of the work
Any INDOOR fieldwork? Q YES X N0
If yes, explain:
General project description, and phase(s) or work to
which this H&S Plan applies.
Remediation and supporting activities in three areas: A-5 (high arsenic and lead
concentrations in soil slated for excavation/off-site disposal); CES-2 (high arsenic in
soil and groundwater slated for excavation/off-site disposal); Low pH Area (low pH,
high dissolved metals slated for in-situ solidfication/stablization (ISS) using Portland
cement)
Specific Tasks to be Performed by GZA:
Observe and document work performed.
Collect samples of ISS-treated material and preapare cylinder molds.
Collect soil/groundwater samples for laboratory analysis.
Coordinate Site activities with Owner, GZA staff and Subs.
Perform air monitoring readings/calibrations.
Concurrent Tasks to be Performed by GZA
Subcontractors (List Subcontractors by Name):
Subcontractors TBD.
Establish field trailer, including necessary utilities and controls.
Install erosion/sedimentation controls.
Install sheet piling in CES-2 and Low pH Area.
Establish equipment for dewatering CES-2 Area.
Excavate and stockpile overburden soil and impacted soil from CES-2 Area and A-5
Area.
Characterize soil for off-Site disposal; treat soil for TCLP issues as necessary; and
arrange/manage off-site disposal.
Excavate and stockpile overburden soil from Low pH area; conduct ISS of impacted
zone.
Backfill remediation areas to existing grade.
Demobilize.
Concurrent Tasks to be Performed by Others:
TBD
5. SITE-SPECIFIC OVERVIEW OF H&S HAZARDS/MITIGATIONS (Note: Based on Hazard Assessment, Section 10)
Describe the major hazards expected to be present at the jobsite, and describe the safety measures to be implemented for worker
protection. Use brief abstract statements or more detailed narrative as may be appropriate.
ON-SITE HAZARDS:
HAZARD MITIGATIONS:
Task Hazard Analyses
Refer to the attached Task Hazard Analyses:
04.02 - Excavation and Trenching (Heavy Equipment)
06.01 - Sampling-Logging-Survey Test Pits and Excavations
06.02 - Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
20.11 - Field Sampling
21.01 - General Outdoor Field Work
Chemical Hazards
High concentrations of metals, predominantly lead and arsenic, have been detected
in soils at the Site. In addition, groundwater in the low pH area has been measured
to have a pH below 4, with the lowest recorded pH of 1.63. GZA personnel will wear
appropriate PPE for these conditions, including Tyvek and respirators, and will
monitor ambient air for fugitive dust levels using a dust monitoring device. Refer to
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 3
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
the attached Lead and Arsenic Compliance Plan.
Handwashing will be required before leaving the site and before eating, drinking,
applying cosmetics (e.g., lip balm), or smoking. Handwash and eye wash stations
will be set up by the field trailer.
Heavy Equipment Hazards
Open excavations and moving machinery will be present at the work site and may
be working in several areas of the site concurrently. Do not approach heavy
equipment from the operator's blind spot, and do not approach unless visual
confirmation of your presence has been made with the equipment operator and he
has given you the go-ahead sign to approach.
Field personnel will be required to wear a high-visibility vest at all times. Also,
appropriate protective clothing will be worn (e.g., hard-hat, safety glasses, steel¬
toed boots, etc.). Personnel must be cognizant of slip, trip, and fall hazards while
overseeing excavation work. Noise protection should be worn if ambient levels
exceed 85 decibels.
General Field Work Hazards
There will be open excavations. Observer needs to be at the furthest end of the
excavation from the operator and in line of sight with the operator. Stay clear of
swing radius of equipment unless eye contact/coordination is made with equipment
operator for personnel to enter swing radius area to make observations or collect
samples. If possible, collect soil/water samples from the securely placed bucket of
the excavator on the surface of the ground at a safe distance from the excavation.
Do not enter the excavation unless it is properly sloped or shored. GZA personnel
must abide by Health and Safety protocols established by the general contractor
when working in or near areas with other construction-related hazards or should
avoid these areas if possible.
Fall Hazards
Take care to look for open excavations on site. Do not enter trenches or excavations
at the Site.
Dust Hazards
The earthwork process will disturb soil that could result in airborne dust exposure.
Dust control is the responsibility of the site general contractor. However, prudent
practices by GZA personnel must be employed to minimize the inhalation hazard of
airborne dust (through the use of a dust masks or respirators when necessary) and
the ingestion of dust (through the use of protective gloves and hand washing).
SLIP/TRIP/FALL HAZARDS
Uneven footing is anticipated when working near open excavations. Uneven
footing is also anticipated on the banks of the river due to mud and/cobbles,
which may be slippery. Caution, in the form of slow and precise movements,
should be used when moving on or near the riverbank.
Use care to prevent or minimize tripping/slipping hazards. Store hand tools in their
proper storage location when not in use. Ensure ample space for each employee to
work safely with sound footing.
BITING/STINGING INSECTS HAZARDS
Ticks carry the risk of Lyme and other insect-borne diseases; tuck pants into long
socks and apply DEET (or permethrin pre-treatment) to clothing in season to
control exposure to ticks, check clothing for ticks frequently, and check whole
body immediately upon returning from field and shower.
Be aware of intermittent seasonal reports of mosquito borne diseases, such as
West Nile disease and Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE), and their locations
relative to your field site. Use DEET or other mosquito repellant.
Be aware of potential cavity, suspended or ground nesting bee/wasp/hornet nests.
Avoid undue disturbance.
Weather-Related Hazards
Water, sunscreen, hardhat, tinted sunglasses, rain gear (if necessary) and periodic
breaks.
Assess weather conditions prior to on-site work and examine forecast for
anticipated period of work. Dress appropriately for weather conditions (e.g.,
precipitation, temperature ranges over anticipated duration of field work). Be sure
to consume plenty of liquids on hot summer days and avoid direct sunlight for
extended periods of time to the extent possible given site conditions. Use protective
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 4
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
ointments such as sunscreen and chap stick, as appropriate to the field conditions.
Be aware of the anticipated weather conditions prior to mobilization to the site.
Unacceptable field work conditions are not precise, but may include site specific
conditions, general location, extreme weather conditions (e.g., lightning, excessive
cold, heat or wind), travel conditions, and other factors. Professional judgment is
required.
6. HEALTH AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
X Respirator Type: Half-face negative pressure to be
conformant with lead/asbestos control program document plan
X Resp-CartridgeType: HEPA, organic vapor
X Hardhat
] Outer Gloves Type:
AIR MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
I I PIDType: Lamp Energy: eV
□ FID Type:
I | Carbon Monoxide Meter
1X1 Hydrogen Sulfide Meter
□ 0 2 /LEL Meter
1X1 Particulate (Dust) Meter
I I Calibration Gas Type
I I Others:
Note: Ensure instruments have been properly calibrated
OTHER H&S EQUIPMENT & GEAR
I I Fire Extinguisher
□ Caution Tape
IX Traffic Cones or Stanchions
I | Warning Signs or Placards
□ Decon Buckets, Brushes, etc.
I | Portable Ground Fault Interrupter (GFI)
I | Lockout/Tagout Equipment
I | Ventilation Equipment
I I Others:
IX Inner Gloves Type: Nitrile
X Steel-toed boots/shoes
X Coveralls Type:
□ Outer Boots Type:
X Eye Protection with side shields
□ Face Shield
X Traffic Vest
I | Personal Flotation Device (PFD)
I | Fire Retardant Clothing
I | EH (Electrical Hazard) Rated Boots, Gloves, etc.
X Noise/Hearing Protection
I I Others:
Discuss/Clarify, as Appropriate:
• Respirators will be cleaned daily using alcohol wipes
• Boots and outer gloves (if used) will be decontaminated with
soapy water and a boot brush in the appropriate
decontamination area.
• Disposable PPE (Tyvek suits and gloves) will be disposed at
each break and at the end of the shift in the appropriate drum
located in the decontamination area.
7. AIR MONITORING ACTION LEVELS
Is air monitoring to be performed for this project? Yes X No
Make sure air monitoring instruments are in working order and have been calibrated prior to use. Depending on project-specific requirements,
periodic field calibration checks may be necessary during the day of instrument use.
Action levels for Oxygen Defic
Applicable, See Below.
iency and Explosive atmospheric hazards (Action levels apply to occupied work space in general work area)
X Not Applicable
Parameter
Response Actions for Elevated Airborne Hazards
Oxygen
At 19.5% or below - Exit area, provide adequate ventilation, or proceed to Level B, or discontinue activities
Verify presence of adequate oxygen (approx. 12% or more) before taking readings with LEL meter.
Note: If oxygen levels are below 12%, LEL meter readings are not valid.
Less than 10% LEL - Continue working, continue to monitor LEL levels
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13) P a 8 e 5
Project:
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
LEL
Greater than or Equal to 10% LEL — Discontinue work operations and immediately withdraw from area.
Resume work activities ONLY after LEL readings have been reduced to less than 10% through passive
dissipation, or through active vapor control measures.
Acti
X
dn levels for inhalation of Toxic/Hazardous Substances (Action levels are for sustained breathing zone concentrations)
Applicable, See Below. Not Applicable
Air Quality Parameters
(Check all that apply)
Remain in Level D
or Modified D
Response Actions for Elevated Airborne Hazards
VOCs
0 to ppm
From ppm to ppm: Proceed to Level C, or Ventilate, or Discontinue Activities
If greater than ppm: Proceed to Level B, or, Ventilate, or Discontinue Activities
□
Carbon Monoxide
0 to 35 ppm
At greater than 35 ppm, exit area, provide adequate ventilation, proceed to Level B, or
discontinue activities.
E
Hydrogen Sulfide
0 to 10 ppm
At greater than 10 ppm, exit area, provide adequate ventilation, proceed to Level B, or
discontinue activities
□
Dust
0 to mg/m 3
E
Lead
Oto 30 ug/m 3
Workers will be working in half face negative pressure respirators with HEPAP-100 filters as a
precaution for lead exposure. PPE requirements may change after the initial exposure
assessment purposes. GZA EHS staff will advise PPE levels required after evaluating initial
exposure assessment results.
E
Arsenic
Oto 5 ug/m 3
Workers will be working in half face negative pressure respirators with HEPAP-100 filters as a
precaution for arsenic exposure. PPE requirements may change after the initial exposure
assessment purposes. GZA EHS staff will advise PPE levels required after evaluating initial
exposure assessment results.
Special Instructions/Comments regarding Air Monitoring (if applicable)
8. H&S TRAINING/QUALIFICATIONS FOR FIELD PERSONNEL
^Project-Specific H&S Orientation (Required for All Projects/Staff)
1 1 Bloodborne Pathogen Training
X OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER/8 Hour Refreshers
1 1 Fall Protection Training
X Hazard Communication (for project-specific chemical products)
[X Trenching & Excavation
X First Aid/CPR (at least one individual on site)
1X1 Current Medical Clearance Letter
[XI General Construction Safety Training
□
1 | Lockout/Tagout Training
□
1 1 Electrical Safety Training
□
Discuss/Clarify, as needed:
9. PROJECT PERSONNEL-
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
GZA On-Site Personnel:
Name(s)
Project Title/Assigned Role
Telephone Numbers
TBD
Site Supervisor
Work:
Cell:
TBD
Field Safety Officer
Work:
Cell:
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 6
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
TBD
First Aid Personnel
Work:
Cell:
TBD
GZA Project Team Members
Work:
Cell:
Site Supervisors and Project Managers (SS/PM): Responsibility for compliance with GZA Health and Safety programs, policies, procedures and
applicable laws and regulations is shared by all GZA management and supervisory personnel. This includes the need for effective oversight and
supervision of project staff necessary to control the Health and Safety aspects of GZA on-site activities.
Site Safety Officer (SSO): The SSO is responsible for implementation of the Site Specific Health and Safety Plan.
First Aid Personnel: At least one individual designated by GZA who has current training and certification in basic first aid and cardiopulmonary
resuscitation (CPR) must be present during on-site activities involving multiple GZA personnel.
GZA Project Team: Follow instructions relayed by the HASP and GZA manager on-site.
Other Project Personnel:
Name
Project Title/Assigned Role
Telephone Numbers
Lawrence Feldman
Principal-in-Charge
Work: 781-278-3807
Cell: 781-983-1675
David E. Leone
Project Manager
Work: 781-278-5766
Cell: 781-603-5073
Melissa Kenerson
Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC)
Work: 781-278-3814
Cell: 781-223-6517
Richard Ecord GZA EHS Director Work: 781-278-3809
Cell: 404-234-2834
Principal-in-Charge: Responsible of overall project oversight, including responsibility for Health and Safety.
Project Manager: Responsible for day-to-day project management, including Health and Safety.
Health and Safety Coordinator: General Health and Safety guidance and assistance.
GZA EHS Director: H &S technical and regulatory guidance, assistance regarding GZA H&S policies and procedures.
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 7
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
10. HAZARD ASSESSMENT (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
A. General Fieldwork Hazards
| | Confined Space Entry (STOP - Use Confined Space Entry HASP)
] Abandoned or vacant building/Enclosed Spaces
[X] Significant Slip/Trip/Fall Hazards
Unsanitary/Infectious Hazards
] Poisonous Plants
[X] Biting/Stinging Insects
X Feral Animal Hazards
[X] Water/Wetlands Hazards
] Remote Locations/Navigation/Orientation hazards
] Heavy Traffic or Work Alongside a Roadway
[X] Weather-Related Hazards
X Motor vehicle operation Hazards
[X] Heavy Equipment Hazards
I | Structural Hazards (i.e. unsafe floors/stairways/roof)
] Demolition/Renovation
I | Presence of Pedestrians or the General Public
[X] Overhead Hazards (i.e. falling objects, overhead power lines)
Portable Hand Tools or Power Tools
]] Significant Lifting or Ergonomic Hazards
] Electrical Hazards (i.e. Equipment 120 Volts or Greater, Work
Inside Electrical Panels, or Maintenance of Electrical Equipment)
X Other Stored energy Hazards (i.e. Equipment with High Pressure
or Stored Chemicals)
]] Fire and/or Explosion Hazard
E/*\] Elevated Noise Levels
[>\| Excavations/Test Pits
] Explosives or Unexploded Ordinance/MEC
] Long Distance or Overnight Travel
] Personal Security or High Crime Area Hazards
]] Working Alone
Ionizing Radiation or Non-Ionizing Radiation
EX\1 Chemical/Exposure Hazards (See Part Bfor Details)
| | Other:
B. Chemical/Exposure Hazards
I | No chemical hazards anticipated
[X] Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
1/^1 Cyanides, Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN)
J Carbon Monoxide
1 | Herbicides, Pesticide, Fungicide, Animal Poisons
|/*\1 Metals, Metal Compounds
[X] Corrosives, Acids, Caustics, Strong Irritants
I | Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
[X] Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
I | Compressed Gases
I | Flammable/Combustible Liquids
1 1 Radiation Hazards (i.e. radioactive sealed/open source, x-rays,
ultra violet, infrared, radio-frequency, etc.)
]] Methane
[X] Chemicals Subject to OSHA Hazard Communication (Note: For
commercial chemical products, attach MSDSs if applicable)
1 1 Containerized Waste, Chemicals in Piping & Process Equipment
EX] Emissions from Gasoline-, Diesel-, Propane-fired Engine, Heater,
Similar Equipment
[X] General Work Site Airborne Dust Hazards
1 1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), BTEX
1 1 Chlorinated Organic Compounds
1 1 Fuel Oil, Gasoline, Petroleum Products, Waste Oil
I | Asbestos
1 1 Oxygen Deficiency, Asphyxiation Hazards
I | Other:
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 8
GZA SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH, SAFETY & ACCIDENT PREVENTION STANDARD-PLAN
11. PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND APPROVALS
GZA Employee Plan Acknowledgement
/ have read, understood, and agree to abide by the information set forth in this Safety and Accident Prevention Plan. 1 will follow guidance in
this plan and in the GZA Health and Safety Program Manual. 1 understand the training and medical monitoring requirements covered by the
work outlined in this plan and have met those requirements.
GZA Employee Name
GZA Employee Signature
Date
Subcontractor Employee Plan Acknowledgement
GZA has prepared this plan solely for the purpose of protecting the health and safety of GZA employees. Subcontractors, visitors, and others
at the site must refer to their organization's health and safety program or site-specific HASP for their protection. Subcontractor employees
may use this plan for general informational purposes only. Subcontractor firms are obligated to comply with safety regulations applicable to
their work, and understand this plan covers GZA activities only.
Subcontractor Employee Name
Subcontractor Employee Signatures
Date
GZA Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan Approval Signatures
The following individuals indicate their acknowledgement and/or approval of the contents of this Site Specific H&S Plan based on their
understanding of project work activities, associated hazards and the appropriateness of health and safety measures to be implemented.
GZA Signatory
Employee Name
Employee Signature
Date
Preparer:
EHS Reviewer:
PIC Approval:
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (Revised 10/13)
Project:
Page 9
TAILGATE SAFETY MEETING
CHECK ONE:
Initial H&S Orientation
Periodic “Toolbox” Safety Meeting
Project Site/Location
Date
Time
Job No.
PM
PIC
The undersigned have attended a Health and Safety briefing, consisting of a review of the provisions of the Site
Specific H&S Plan, and/or appropriate prior H&S events or concerns, and/or review of anticipated H&S concerns
and safety measures for the project.
SUMMARY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY TOPICS COVERED
NAME (printed)
SIGNATURE
COMPANY
Conducted by:
Date:
Google Maps
Page 1 of 3
Google
Directions from 1 Horizon Way to 55 Fruit St
Drive 3.9 miles, 9 min
O 1 Horizon Way
Everett, MA 02149
Head southeast on Horizon Way
toward Broadway
3 ft / 0 s
r on one uaroen m
Energy To Go •
<£
<?
/
• Malden Auto Bod)
B Gurdwera
Sangat B*
LTl Worldwide
Limousine
4 s
* /
s
Continue on MA-99 S/Alford St. Take
Rutherford Ave and New Rutherford Ave
to N Grove St in Boston
https://www.google.eom/maps/dir/l+Horizon+Way,+Everett,+MA+02149/55+Fruit+St,+
10/8/2014
Google Maps
Page 2 of 3
3.8 mi / 8 min
r 2. Turn right onto MA-99 S/Alford St
0.6
*1 3. Slight left onto Rutherford Ave
0.7
4. Continue onto New Rutherford Ave ni!
0.6
A 5. Sharp right onto the ramp to Storrow 1
Drive
1.2 mi
t 6. Continue onto MA-3 N/MA-3A N
0.3
7. Take the Massachusetts 3 N exit ofilhe
left toward Government Center/Kendall
Square
144
r 8. Keep right to continue toward Cambridge
St
0.2
\ 9. Keep left at the fork, follow signs foP 11
Hospitals/Governmet Center
289
10. Slight left onto Cambridge St
o.i
mi
Follow N Grove St to Fruit St
499 ft / 30 s
*1 11. Turn left onto N Grove St
479
t 1 2. N Grove St turns left and becomes f1 Fruit
St
0 Destination will be on the right
20
ft
1 Horizon Way
Cheisea
Somerville
5 V\\oqton
C-hartestown
wLriompson
^ \Sqoare / .
Cambridge c “">6rr* JC St
@ &o , \
1st Boston
East
Cambridge
Bmnty s
Wesiero
Boston Inner
Harbor
Hi:1 Boston (v
Charles
River Basin
Boston Childrens
Museum
Ch'natoj
le Hills Bank Pavili
Fenway/
Ken more
CO
® 55 Fruit St
Boston, MA 02114
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/!+Horizon+Way ,+Everett,+MA+02149/55+Fruit+St,+...
10/8/2014
Lead and Arsenic Exposure Compliance Program
This program applies to work where a worker may be occupationally exposed to lead and/or arsenic. This
program has been developed for portions of the former Everett Staging Area Disposal Site located at 1 Horizon
Way in Everett Massachusetts, more specifically, the A-5 Area, CES-2 Area, and Low pH Area. All work
related to the remedial actions being conducted in these areas is included.
GZA has prepared this plan solely for the purpose of protecting the health and safety of GZA employees.
Subcontractors, visitors, and others at the site must refer to their organization’s health and safety program or
site-specific HASP for their protection. Subcontractor employees may use this plan for general informational
purposes only. Subcontractor firms are obligated to comply with safety regulations applicable to their work,
and understand this plan covers GZA activities only.
The purpose of this program is to inform interested persons, including employees, that GZA GeoEnvironmental
is complying with the OSHA Lead Standard, Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.62, and the
OSHA Arsenic Standard, Title 29 CFR 1926.1118 by:
• Assuring that no employee is exposed to lead at concentrations greater than 50 micrograms per cubic
meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period.
• Assuring that no employee is exposed to arsenic at concentrations greater than 10 micrograms per cubic
meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period.
• Providing that if an employee is exposed to lead for more than eight hours in any work day the
employee's allowable exposure, as a time weighted average (TWA) for that day, must be reduced
according to the following formula: Allowable employee exposure (in micrograms per cubic meter) =
400 divided by hours worked in the day.
• Confirming that when respirators are used to limit employee exposure as required by paragraph (c) of
Section 1926.62, and all the requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) and (f) of Section 1926.62, have been
met, employee exposure may be considered to be at the level provided by the protection factor of the
respirator for those periods the respirator is worn. Those periods may be averaged with exposure levels
during periods when respirators are not worn to determine the employee's daily TWA exposure.
• Enacting portions of the lead and arsenic standards when the lead action level of 30 micrograms per
cubic meter of air, or when the arsenic action level of 5 micrograms per cubic meter of air, is exceeded.
Administrative Duties
Richard Ecord, CIH, CSP is the GZA program coordinator/manager and is responsible for its implementation.
Copies of the written program may be obtained at the established field trailer.
Exposure Assessment
Protection of Employees During Exposure Assessment
When tasks are presumed to generate lead or arsenic exposures greater than their permissible exposure limits,
we treat affected employees as if they were exposed above the PEL and implement procedures to protect
workers until we perform an employee exposure assessment and document that an employee's exposures are not
above the PEL.
Tasks estimated to potentially expose employees above PELs include:
Excavation and stockpiling of soils in areas A-5 and CES-2;
Excavation and stockpiling of overburden soils in the Low pH area;
• In-situ solidification/stabilization of soils in the Low pH area; and
• Sampling of stockpiled soils.
GZA personnel will be required to use the following controls to minimize exposure to airborne lead and/or
arsenic:
• Appropriate respiratory protection;
• Proper personal protective clothing and equipment;
• Hand washing facilities; and
• Training. '
Initial Determination
Other than an initial determination of which tasks may potentially expose employees above PELs, an initial
determination will not be made for this project. The concentration of airborne lead and/or arsenic coming from
contaminated soil is affected by site conditions, temperatures, methods used, and other site contaminants;
therefore, experience at similar sites cannot be used to estimate exposure levels. Since any exposure would
come from lead and/or arsenic-contaminated soils as they are disturbed, the exposure assessment cannot be
made until soils are being disturbed. As a precaution, employees will work in half-face respirators using HEPA
cartridges for all activities at the site that are anticipated to generate lead and/or arsenic-containing dust.
Employees will also be required to wash their hands and faces prior to eating, drinking, applying cosmetics
(e.g., lip balm) or smoking until initial exposure assessments have been completed.
Initial Exposure Assessments
Initial monitoring will consist of:
• Employee exposure monitoring, and
• Area exposure monitoring.
Personal air samples will be collected when the tasks outlined above are started. Those samples will be
analyzed in an accredited laboratory. If laboratory sample results indicate concentrations of airborne lead or
arsenic above their respective action levels, employee monitoring will be continued. The program coordinator
will advise project personnel of the types and frequency of additional air samples to be collected.
Perimeter air samples will be collected during initial mobilization activities and prior to the start of the tasks
outlined above. Perimeter air samples will also be collected when excavation work begins in the work zone. If
laboratory sample results indicate concentrations of airborne lead or arsenic above their respective action levels,
employee monitoring will be conducted for those with the greatest perceived exposure in the work zone. Area
dust monitoring will also be conducted over the course of the project.
Once initial exposure assessments have been completed, the use of real-time dust monitoring may be used
instead of air samples at the discretion of the program coordinator. The program coordinator will advise project
personnel on the suitability of using real-time dust monitoring after the initial exposure assessment has been
completed.
Additional Exposure Assessments
This plan has been developed in anticipation of employee exposure to lead and arsenic during the tasks outlined
above. The work zone has been pre-characterized to document concentrations of lead and arsenic anticipated to
be encountered during excavation. Soil samples collected from depth within the proposed work areas were
analyzed for lead and arsenic (as well as other known contaminants).
Employee Notification
We will notify in writing any employee whose personal air samples exceed the action level for either lead or
arsenic within five working days of our receiving the results. A copy of the results will also be added to the
employee’s training file database, currently maintained through Keller Online.
Methods of Compliance
This exposure control program is our written strategy and schedule for protecting our workers from lead and
arsenic exposure. It incorporates all relevant information that relates to this goal, so that we can assess whether
we have appropriately analyzed problems and solutions (including alternatives) relating to lead and arsenic
exposure.
To reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead and arsenic at or below the PEL, we have implemented
respirator use, protective clothing, and good housekeeping procedures. Work practice programs are included in
this compliance program under separate headings.
This job is a multi-employer worksite. The procedure we use to cooperate with and inform other contractors of
potential exposure to lead and arsenic is the development of a health and safety specification that references this
compliance plan, and that contains lead and arsenic pre-characterization data for soils that will be excavated or
disturbed as part of the work scope for this project.
As an employer, we want to keep our employees informed of all aspects of this plan. The GZA Project Manager
will make frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials, and equipment, and confirm that a copy of
this written plan is available at the worksite.
Respiratory Protection
During our initial exposure assessment, we treat employees performing certain operations as if they were
exposed above the PEL. This means providing respiratory protection. Our respiratory protection program
includes a copy of the requirements of 20 CFR 1926.62(f), 29 CFR 1926.62 App. B, and 29 CFR 1910.134 and
is available upon request.
Protective Work Clothing and Equipment
We provide personal protective equipment as interim protection for employees during exposure assessment,
since our employees may be exposed to lead and/or arsenic (1) above the PEL without regard to the use of
respirators, or (2) to metal compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation. We provide protective clothing
and equipment at no cost to our employees.
The types of employee garments and equipment provided on this worksite will include Tyvek suits, nitrile
gloves, and safety glasses. Disposable Tyvek suits and nitrile gloves will be used and will be disposed of at the
end of the shift, whenever taken off to allow eating, or when required based on tasks being completed. Safety
glasses will be cleaned as needed. Respirators will be cleaned at the end of every shift and visually inspected
daily. Respirators found to be in need of replacement or repair, or those that have no visual defects but do not
form a seal, will not be used.
Housekeeping
GZA believes that a rigorous housekeeping program is necessary in jobs where there is the potential for lead
and/or arsenic exposure to keep airborne levels below permissible limits. This requires a regular housekeeping
schedule adapted to exposure conditions on site. For this project, our procedure for housekeeping is to cover
stockpiles of soil with high lead or arsenic concentrations to prevent windblown dust. If required, these soils
shall be wetted to control dust generation. Heavy equipment will be cleaned as required to prevent the transport
of heavily contaminated soils to other areas of the work zone or to areas outside of the project.
Hygiene Facilities and Practices
We provide hand washing stations for our workers. We prohibit smoking, eating, applying cosmetics, and the
presence of tobacco products, foodstuffs, or cosmetics in all work areas where employees are exposed to lead
and/or arsenic above the PEL. We monitor worker compliance with these practices by visual inspection and
routine safety audits. Where projects may present these exposures, we require employees to wash their hands
and face before eating, drinking, applying cosmetics, or smoking.
Medical Surveillance
GZA GeoEnvironmental supports the practices necessary for early detection of lead and/or arsenic exposure.
The medical surveillance program supplements the primary goals of the lead and/or arsenic exposure control
program of preventing disease through the elimination or reduction of airborne concentrations of lead and/or
arsenic, and of sources of ingestion. The medical surveillance provisions incorporate both initial and ongoing
medical surveillance.
We provide initial medical surveillance to employees who are occupationally exposed to airborne lead and/or
arsenic levels at or above the PEL. Monitoring for lead consists of sampling blood and analyzing it for lead and
zinc protoporphyrin levels. Where this initial biological monitoring indicates that an employee's blood lead
level is at or above 40 micrograms per deciliter of whole blood, we provide biological monitoring at least every
two months. This frequency continues until two consecutive blood samples and analyses indicate that the
employee's blood lead level is below 40 micrograms per deciliter of whole blood. Monitoring for arsenic
consists of posterior-anterior chest x-rays and nasal and skin examinations.
All medical examinations and procedures are performed by Occupational Healthcare Clinics arranged through
WorkCare. Employees are required to be reevaluated for medical clearance every 2 years.
Medical Removal Protection
We remove employees from work who have exposures to lead or arsenic at or above the action level when a
blood sample indicates that the blood lead levels are at or above 50 micrograms per deciliter of whole blood.
We also remove employees from work who have exposures to lead and/or arsenic at or above the action level
when a health care professional determines that they have medical conditions which, when exposed to lead
and/or arsenic, places them at greater risk health problems.
Employee Information and Training
Employees can do much to protect themselves from the risks of occupational lead and arsenic exposure if they
know about them. In our training program we inform each employee subject to exposure of the specific hazards
associated with their work environment, protective measures that can be taken, and other important topics. A
discussion of lead and arsenic exposure will be included in tailgate safety meetings that will be conducted at the
start of each work day, and during the day if assignments and tasks change. In addition, information from the
OSHA lead and arsenic standards is kept onsite and available to any employee wishing to read it.
Signs
Because exposure to lead and arsenic is a serious health hazard, GZA posts OSHA-compliant signs that warn
employees of lead and arsenic hazards and prohibitions. Employees are also informed of hazards through
training.
Recordkeeping
GZA maintains biological and environmental monitoring records of employee exposures to potentially toxic
materials, including lead and arsenic. We allow employees access to their records.
We include the following exposure monitoring records:
• Exposure assessment;
• Medical surveillance results;
• Medical removals;
• Procedures for making records available; and
• Procedures for transfer of records.
Observation of Monitoring
We provide our employees or their representatives the opportunity to observe exposure monitoring of toxic
materials or harmful physical agents. Our procedure for allowing observation includes:
• Explaining the measurement procedure;
• Allowing observation of all steps related to the measurement procedure;
• Disseminating of the results when returned by the laboratory;
• Providing an observer with proper personal protective devices; and
• Assuring that observers comply with all applicable safety and health procedures.
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Q2AJ) JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Pre-work preparation
Overlooking of potential
hazards
Become familiar with project area and job site by
reviewing available on-line mapping (USGS
Topographic, NWI Wetland, NRCS Soil, etc.; and
aerial photographs before visiting site. Understand
related hazards through review of this and other
Task Hazard Analyses and participate in daily
safety tailgate meetings (where applicable).
Communicate Task Hazard Analysis and Lessons
Learned information to operator(s) prior to initiating
work and throughout the project as needed.
Driving to site
Vehicle
accidents/collisions/injuries
Perform pre-operation check of vehicle, verifying service
brakes, parking brake, steering, lights, tires, horn,
wipers mirrors and glass are in good condition, verify
that the rig is roadworthy.
Wear seat belts always when driving even on site.
Secure loose materials in cab or bed of vehicle.
Keep windshields, windows and lights cleans.
Abide by safe driving procedures.
Backing collisions
If possible avoid backing by using a route that allows
you to pull through.
If backing up from a parked area do a quality 360
walker.
Working within transportation
corridors or active construction
sites
Collisions injuries
Job Hazard Analy
Wear high visibility safety vest on site when out of
personal or GZA vehicle.
Park vehicle in designated parking locations, or
select off-road area that is firm, and without
hazards. Directly inspect parking location on foot if
necessary.
Use emergency flashers or other appropriate
vehicle warning system as appropriate to local
conditions when parking vehicle.
Use emergency flashers or other appropriate
vehicle warning system when parking outside of
standard parking spaces, or to stop in right-of-
Be alert at all times; never step outside traffic
cones.
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 1 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1
OZ\j) JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET |
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Stand clear of moving heavy equipment and away
from any overhead utility lines until equipment is
safely in position and parked properly and securely
bv the contractor.
Do not wear headphones or earbuds, or listen to music
or talk on the phone, which may distract from work
hazards.
Crossing Automobile traffic
lanes
Wear high visibility safety vests at all times when
out of vehicle and working within or adjacent to the
roadway.
Crossing Airport Movement
Areas (e.g., Runways, taxiways,
approaches)
Learn, know, and conform to project site Airport’s,
Airfield’s, or Airbase’s protocol for crossing
movement areas (whether on foot or in vehicle).
Work within airport movement areas or safety
zones must be coordinated with the Air Traffic
Control Tower.
Vehicles to have blinking or flashing lights or
beacons; pedestrians to wear high visibility safety
vests.
Using protocol, maintain communication with
airport security and air traffic controllers.
Crossing Railways
Work within active railroad ROWs requires railroad
safety training. No work can be done within the
railroad traffic envelope without the permission of a
railroad flagman.
No equipment or vehicles can cross without the
permission of a railroad flagman.
Expect any train on any track coming from either
direction at any time.
Working in Natural or Remote
Areas
Slips, trips, fall
Be aware of loose ground materials such as talus,
unconsolidated rock, soil, sediment, ice and other
media that could cause slips, trips or falls.
Be careful when walking in heavily vegetated
areas. Mind tangles of vines, thorny branches, and
slippery logs and rock surfaces. Dense vegetation
and especially entangled vines present trip
hazards, or can mask voids, sharp objects, or
other hazards beneath.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 2 of 8
OZY
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Be vigilant for signs of cracking, shifting, fracturing,
and evidence of past movement.
Use wood mats or other stabilizing materials for
equipment if soft ground conditions are present.
Use walking stick, auger, or ski poles to steady
yourself when traversing loose material or slopes.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 3 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
GrZ\]) JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
[Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Wear proper footwear for conditions.
Store tools in their proper storage location when
not in use.
Provide adequate lighting when necessary.
Fails into excavations/ voids
Stand away from edges of excavations and voids.
Do not attempt access without proper equipment /
training. Remember that some excavations or
voids may constitute a confined space and may
present structural stability issues.
Cave-ins and engulfment
DO NOT enter caves, sinkholes, excavations, and
other voids or concavities that are not sloped or
shored properly and have not been evaluated by a
competent person to be safe.
Stand away from edges of excavations, cliffs, dug
wells, and other voids.
Watch for cracks/fissures in the ground surface in
the immediate vicinity of a pit or void, which
indicate imminent sidewall failure/cave-in.
Assess if confined space entry procedures need to
be implemented.
Before entering void (if required to do so and with
proper training) be aware of any hazards at the
surface (boulders, equipment) which may fall into
the void.
Working among hazardous
biota
Plant toxins Incidental contact
Know the appearance of poison ivy and poison
sumac in all seasons, and if sensitive to these
toxins, carry and use special cleaning
soaps/solutions when thought to be exposed.
Stock first aid kit with poison ivy/sumac cleaning
soaps/solutions.
Ticks
Ticks carry risk of Lyme’s and other Diseases.
Tick season is basically any field day above 40
deqrees F.
Tuck pants into long socks.
The application of DEET (or permethrin pre¬
treatment) to clothing in season to control
exposure to ticks is recommended.
Check clothing for ticks frequently.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 4 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Check whole body immediately upon returning
from field and shower.
Mosquitoes
Be aware of intermittent seasonal reports of
mosquito borne diseases, such as West Nile
disease and Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE),
and their locations relative to your field site. Use of
DEET or other mosquito repellant is
recommended.
Stinging bees and wasps
Be aware of potential cavity, suspended or ground
nesting bee/wasp/hornet nests. Avoid undue
disturbance or approach with appropriate safety
clothing, protection and netting.
Take appropriate precautions if allergic to bees.
Carry at least two epi-pens in first aid kit as well as
anti-histamines (oral and inhalers).
Avoid areas of heavy bee activity if allergic. Avoid
perfumed soaps, shampoos, deodorants,
colognes, etc. that may attract bees.
Poisonous Snakes
Be aware of terrain likelihood of harboring
poisonous snakes in your work zone. Avoid
reaching or stepping into hidden areas (such as
into wood pile, rock pile, debris pile, stone wall,
etc.) without pre-inspection.
Coordinate with local hospitals to verify they have
proper anti-venom in stock.
Learn first aid procedures in case of poisonous
snake bite.
Devise an action plan and include in the site-
specific HASP.
Wild Animals
Do NOT handle wildlife unless properly trained to
do so.
Beware of any wild animal that shows no sign of
wariness of humans.
Do NOT attempt to feed wild animals or to help
apparently injured wild animals.
Be aware of domestic animals that may also pose
a threat such as dogs off leash, bulls out to
pasture, etc.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 5 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work 1
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Working in Adverse Weather
Conditions
Heat / cold stress and other
weather related hazards
Assess weather conditions prior to on-site work
and examine forecast for anticipated period of
work.
Dress appropriately for weather conditions (e.g.,
precipitation, temperature ranges over anticipated
duration of field work). Include clothing and the
presence / absence of shade when calculating a
heat index.
Schedule work day to avoid working during hottest
or coldest parts of the day, to the extent
practicable.
Keep exposed skin covered in extremely cold
weather.
Recognize signs of frostbite; use warming packs
and layer clothing to maintain warmth.
Use a wicking layer of clothing against your body to
keep moisture away from skin.
Wool clothing will continue to keep you warm after
it becomes wet; cotton will not.
Use protective ointments such as sunscreen and
chap stick, as appropriate to the field conditions.
Stay hydrated in hot weather; drink fluids regularly
throughout the day, even if not thirsty.
Recognize signs of heat stress; take frequent
breaks in shade when working in direct sunlight for
orolonqed periods.
Be familiar with Heat index chart - add 20 degrees
to chart if fully clothed and if working in direct
NOTE: Unacceptable field work conditions are not
precise, but may include site specific conditions,
general location, extreme weather conditions (e g.,
icing, lightning, excessive cold or wind), travel
conditions, and other factors. Professional
judgment is required, and personal assessment of
safetv must alwavs be individually assessed.
Working on Ice
Assess relative load bearing capacity of ice on
lakes, ponds and other waterways. If unsure do not
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 6 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Wear proper footwear modified for traction on ice.
Electrical storms
If lightning is observed during drilling activities,
work shall be suspended immediately and
employees shall find suitable shelter (building or
vehicle at minimum). Work will commence no
sooner than 30 minutes after the last indications of
lightning have been observed
Seek shelter inside a walled building or your
vehicle.
Open picnic pavilions and under trees are not
adequate shelters.
Assess vulnerability to lightning strikes as soon as
thunder is heard on the horizon. Open areas and
higher elevations are more susceptible to strikes.
Tall objects such as metal towers and flag poles
may attract lightning.
Consult internet weather radar tracking devices to
learn of impending storm patterns proximal to your
work area.
High Winds
Avoid working at high elevations, elevated
platforms, and other exposed areas during high
wind conditions.
Assess work area for equipment that may be blown
down, over, or carried aloft bv hiah winds.
Working in areas without
sanitary facilities
Hygiene related hazards
Provide hand washing kits (e.g., baby wipes, hand
sanitizers, paper towels, bottled water, etc.) to be
used prior to eating and drinking.
Have garbage bags handy to collect trash.
Working in remote areas
Emergency Conditions
Be familiar with onsite emergency procedures and
route to nearest hospital.
Have a first aid kit available; know its contents and
how to use them.
Carry a cell phone during all field work for
emergency purposes, and confirm the nearest
location of cell phone signal on site prior to start of
worksite.
Disorientation
Plan your route and anticipated progress prior to
field work.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 7 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
OX\j) JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Ijob: General Outdoor Field Work
Analysis By: Anthony Zemba,
CHMM
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: June 25, 2012
Date: July 12,2012
Task 21.1
General Outdoor Field Work
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Have multiple navigation aids (e.g., USGS Map,
compass, GPS, etc.) and know how to use them
before entering field. Remember to have charged
batteries and battery back-ups for electronic
devices.
Share your progress plan with office staff prior to
enterinq the field.
Check in with office personnel periodically to
update progress.
Review and comply with GZA’s Working Alone
Policy 03-1009 in advance of working alone on a
project site.
Hunting
Be familiar with the various game hunting seasons.
Follow rules and guidelines for remaining visible to
It ry to plan work around active hunting seasons or
Idailv peak huntinq hours as warranted.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Page 8 of 8
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
jJob: Field Sampling
Analysis By: Christie Wagner
Reviewed By: Jayanti
Chatterjee, CIH
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee, CIH
Date: November 4, 2011
Revised: July 12, 2012
Date: July 12, 2012
Date: July 12, 2012
Task 20.11
Field Sampling
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks [Potential Hazards [Controls
Review Related THA’s -
21.1 General Outdoor Field Work
Pre work task for site visit
Adverse Weather Conditions
Assess weather conditions prior to on-site work and
examine forecast for anticipated period of work.
Dress appropriately for weather conditions (eg.,
precipitation, temperature ranges over anticipated
duration of field work).
Use protective ointments such as sunscreen and chap
stick, as appropriate to the field conditions.
Be aware of the anticipated weather conditions prior to
mobilization to the site. Unacceptable field work
conditions are not precise, but may include site specific
conditions, general location, extreme weather conditions
(e.g., icing, lightening, excessive cold or wind), travel
conditions, and other factors. Professional judgment is
required, and personal assessment of safety must
always be individually assessed.
Conduct visual inspection of site
Dangerous Terrain
Be aware of the site terrain, watch for holes and rocks
that can be tripping hazards
Learn to identify and watch for plants such as thorn
bushes and poision ivy that can either scratch you or
give you a rash.
Collecting sample
Muscle strain from lifting heavy
objects
Use proper lifting techniques. Use appropriate
mechanical assistance and tools when possible.
Wear work gloves and steel toed boots.
Exposure to unknown sample
Be sure to treat effluent samples as unknowns and wear
the proper PPE.
If there are any unusual odors/fumes coming from a
sample, especially those that cause reactions in the
eyes or nose, leave the area and inform a supervisor
immediately.
Job Hazard Analysis
20.11 Field Sampling
Page 1 of 1
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Analysis By: James Hurley
Reviewed By: Mark Dalpe
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: September 30, 2011
Revised: June 7, 2012
Date: June 7, 2012
Date: June 28, 2012
Task 6.2
Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks [Potential Hazards [Controls
Review Related THA’s -
4.4.A Excavtion and Trenching (Heavy Equipment)
21.1 General Outdoor Field Work
Observation of pile installation by
GZA
Struck by, caught by, run over by
equipment
Maintain safe distance from pile installation equipment
at all times.
Wear appropriate personal protective equipment as
required by the Site Specific Health and Safety Plan
when near rig and in general work area (hard hat, steel
toe boots, work clothes, high visibility vest, eye and
hearing protection, etc.).
Plan an exit route when working in limited access areas.
Noise
Wear hearing protection during pile driving.
Exposure to Hazardous
Substances
Workers should be familiarized with hazards associated
commercial products used in pile driving (fuels,
hydraulic fluid, etc.). Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) should
be available for such products, and that workers should
wear appropriate personal protective equipment.
Long sleeve shirts should be worn during evaluation of
creosote treated timber piles being installed.
Diesel hammers can bleed fuel onto the timber piles
causing soluble creosote to spatter.
Pile Damage or Breakage
Pay attention during pile hoisting and watch for any
damage or defects. Contractors need to be notified
immediately when damage or defects are observed
Maintain a safe distance from pile driving hammer
during testing.
Pile Driving Crane and Other
Construction Equipment
Do not enter swing radius of crane. Eye contact need to
be established with the crane or heavy equipment
operator prior to approaching. Maintain a clear line of
sight with the equipment operators at all times.
Do not use crane treads or out-riggers as a table.
Job Hazard Anal>
Be aware of crane and other equipment movements at
all times and remain at a safe distance during re¬
positioning operations.
Remain clear of pile driving leads when they are being
jij&sitioned, picked up, or laid down.
Task 6 z - Pile arid -Sheet Pile Inssiallailuns
Page 1 of 2
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Analysis By: James Hurley
Reviewed By: Mark Dalpe
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: September 30, 2011
Revised: June 7, 2012
Date: June 7, 2012
Date: June 28, 2012
Task 6.2
Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Pile Driving Hammer
Maintain a safe distance from the hydraulic hammer
hoses which can be under high pressure and heat.
Work Over Open Water
Review and become familiar with the requirements of
GZA Policy 03-3005 Working Near Water.
Wear a PFD at all times while over water. Use
appropriate fall protection when necessary.
Never step between barges or structures over open
water. Use the appropriate access in place.
Be aware of wet surfaces on barges and boats.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 6.2 - Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Page 2 of 2
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Analysis By: James Hurley
Reviewed By: Mark Dalpe
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: September 30, 2011
Revised: June 7, 2012
Date: June 7, 2012
Date: June 28, 2012
Task 6.2
Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
[Potential Hazards [Controls
Review Related THA’s -
4.4.A Excavtion and Trenching (Heavy Equipment)
21.1 General Outdoor Field Work
Observation of pile installation by
GZA
Struck by, caught by, run over by
equipment
Maintain safe distance from pile installation equipment
at all times.
Wear appropriate personal protective equipment as
required by the Site Specific Health and Safety Plan
when near rig and in general work area (hard hat, steel
toe boots, work clothes, high visibility vest, eye and
hearing protection, etc.).
Plan an exit route when working in limited access areas.
Noise
Wear hearing protection during pile driving.
Exposure to Hazardous
Substances
Workers should be familiarized with hazards associated
commercial products used in pile driving (fuels,
hydraulic fluid, etc.). Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) should
be available for such products, and that workers should
wear appropriate personal protective equipment.
Long sleeve shirts should be worn during evaluation of
creosote treated timber piles being installed.
Diesel hammers can bleed fuel onto the timber piles
causing soluble creosote to spatter.
Pile Damage or Breakage
Pay attention during pile hoisting and watch for any
damage or defects. Contractors need to be notified
immediately when damage or defects are observed
Maintain a safe distance from pile driving hammer
during testing.
Pile Driving Crane and Other
Construction Equipment
Do not enter swing radius of crane. Eye contact need to
be established with the crane or heavy equipment
operator prior to approaching. Maintain a clear line of
sight with the equipment operators at all times.
Do not use crane treads or out-riggers as a table.
Job Hazard Anal^
Be aware of crane and other equipment movements at
all times and remain at a safe distance during re¬
positioning operations.
Remain clear of pile driving leads when they are being
0&sitioned, picked up, or laid down.
Task 6 2 - Pile and Sheet Pile IribLallcJiluMs
Page 1 of 2
OZY
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Analysis By: James Hurley
Reviewed By: Mark Dalpe
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: September 30, 2011
Revised: June 7, 2012
Date: June 7, 2012
Date: June 28, 2012
Task 6.2
Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Pile Driving Hammer
Maintain a safe distance from the hydraulic hammer
hoses which can be under high pressure and heat.
Work Over Open Water
Review and become familiar with the requirements of
GZA Policy 03-3005 Working Near Water.
Wear a PFD at all times while over water. Use
appropriate fall protection when necessary.
Never step between barges or structures over open
water. Use the appropriate access in place.
Be aware of wet surfaces on barges and boats.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 6.2 - Pile and Sheet Pile Installations
Page 2 of 2
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Groundwater Sampling
Analysis By: Andrew Whitsitt
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: October 2, 2011
Revised: June 15, 2012
Date: June 15, 2012
Date: June 26, 2012
Task 4.2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
[Potential Hazards
Controls
Review Related THA’s -
21.1 - General Outdoor Field Work
Deploying Traffic Protection
Equipment
Personal injury due to vehicle
traffic; Collisions, injuries
GZA drivers shall be properly licensed and abide by
driving safety procedures. Inspect vehicle to determine
if it is in safe operating condition.
Park in designated parking locations, or select off-road
areas that are firm and without hazards. Directly
observe parking location on foot if necessary.
Use emergency flashers or other appropriate vehicle
warning system as appropriate to local conditions.
Utilize police detail (when necessary) to direct traffic
while entering traffic safety zone, if applicable.
Handling Flammable Liquids
Fire Hazards
Use only approved fuel containers for fuel, heavy duty
metal cans with stable base and self closing nozzle is
recommended.
Store flammable liquids in an appropriate area when not
in use.
Provide working fire extinguisher with current inspection
certificate with the sampling equipment.
Observe GZA’s “no smoking” policy at all work sites.
Mobilizing Equipment
Collision; struck by
Perform a pre-operation check of the vehicle, ensuring
service brakes, parking brake, steering, lights, tires,
horn, wipers mirrors, and glass are in good condition.
Do not drive a vehicle that is not roadworthy.
All vehicle occupants shall wear seat belts.
Secure loose materials in the cab or bed of the vehicle.
Keep the windows and lights clean.
Do not operate the vehicle if it is in an unsafe condition.
Abide by driving safety procedures and laws.
Positioning vehicle at monitoring
well
Unstable, uneven terrain and
ground obstacles
Locate the vehicle on stable ground.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 4.2 - Groundwater Sampling
Page 1 of 3
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Groundwater Sampling
Analysis By: Andrew Whitsitt
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: October 2, 2011
Revised: June 15, 2012
Date: June 15, 2012
Date: June 26, 2012
Task 4.2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
HAZARD CONTROLS
GZA Job Tasks
Potential Hazards
Controls
Backing Collisions
Avoid wet areas/mud when possible.
Assess the need for blocking/chocking wheels..
If possible, avoid backing by taking a route that allows
you to pull straight through.
If you must back, do a complete walk around the vehicle
to look for objects that could be struck or run over by the
vehicle.
Use a spotter when available to help guide the backing
safely.
Look over shoulders and glance back to make sure
fenders are clearing objects. Back out slowly.
Well Sampling
Hazardous material contact
Identify wells with hazardous concentrations of
contaminants.
Sample wells in order from least to most impacted.
Wear proper gloves specified in the project HASP when
handling jars, preservatives could leak during shipment
from the laboratory.
Cuts and bruises from Sample jar
Do not over-tighten glass jars (especially VOAs); they
can break, causing a laceration.
Exposure to Hazardous
Substances
Become familiar with the hazards associated with
hazardous commercial products used while
groundwater sampling (laboratory preservatives,
decontamination solutions, etc.). Review Safety Data
Sheets (SDS) for such products.
Wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) as
specified in the Health and Safety Plan (HASP) to avoid
direct contact with Site contaminants, calibration
solutions, decontamination supplies, and laboratory
preservatives.
Respiratory protection as specified by the HASP must
be available and used when necessary.
Decontamination procedures as specified in the HASP
must be followed.
Sampling Equipment Operation
Splashes, electrical shocks, fires,
caught by
Perform an equipment observation before use; pumps,
flow meters, and water quality meters must be
calibrated and in good working condition.
Use GFCI with all electrical cords.
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 4.2 - Groundwater Sampling
Page 2 of 3
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
GE\j) JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
|Job: Groundwater Sampling
Analysis By: Andrew Whitsitt
Reviewed By: Guy Dalton
Approved By: Jayanti Chatterjee , CIH
Date: October 2, 2011
Revised: June 15, 2012
Date: June 15, 2012
Date: June 26, 2012
Task 4.2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
HAZARD CONTROLS
Potential Hazards
Controls
All equipment (especially generators) must be properly
grounded.
Completely shut down all equipment prior to conducting
maintenance activities, fueling, servicing or repairs.
Follow lock-out/tag-out procedures as needed.
Manual lifting, equipment handling
Use proper lifting techniques when lifting equipment
(generators, pumps, air compressors, tubing, etc.) Seek
assistance with heavy loads.
Use work gloves where appropriate to prevent hand
injuries.
Wear steel toed boots.
When containerizing water, do not try to carry more than
you can safely carry. It is better to make multiple trips.
Noise
Wear appropriate hearing protection during activities
that produce noise (running generators, pumps, air
compressors, etc.)
Slips, trips and falls
Maintain a clean and sanitary work area free of
tripping/slipping hazards.
Store hand tools in their proper storage location when
not in use.
Provide adequate space for each employee to work
safely with sound footing.
Provide adequate lighting.
Tool-related hazards
Do not use electrical tools with damaged cords or other
electrical components.
Observe proper electrical safety practices.
Properly maintain tools; do not use damaged tools.
Wear eye protection.
Store and carry tools correctly.
Use the correct tool for the job.
Protect from gouges, hammer blows, cutting tools, etc.
Position your hands to prevent injury in case the tool
slips while in use.
GZA Job Tasks
Job Hazard Analysis
Task 4.2 - Groundwater Sampling
Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX I
EXCAVATED MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN
EXCAVATED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.00 INTRODUCTION
This Excavated Material Management Plan (EMMP) specifies the procedures for the
management of materials excavated during the implementation of remedial actions at the former
Everett Staging Area Disposal Site (the Site). For the purpose of this EMMP, materials
management is defined as the excavation, handling, transporting, stockpiling, testing, and
backfilling of subsurface materials on the Site within the contaminated areas defined as A-5 and
CES-2.
As described in the RAM, existing subsurface materials contain arsenic and lead as a result of
historic industrial activities at the Site. The materials to be managed pursuant to this EMMP are:
1. CES-2 Area: Material present from approximately 6 to 15 feet below the existing ground
surface, identified herein as “Contaminated Soils”.
2. A-5 Area: Material present from the existing ground surface to approximately 8 feet
below the ground surface, also identified herein as “Contaminated Soils.”
3. CES-2 Area and Low pH Area: Material present from the ground surface to the top of
underlying Contaminated Soils is identified herein as “Overburden Soils.”
2.00 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EMMP
In general, the EMMP consists of the following major components:
Material Classification Procedures
Material to be excavated during remedial actions will be classified by depth based on the results
of existing environmental testing data. Surface soils classified as Overburden Soils will be reused
as backfill on-Site. Soils in the CES-2 Area from approximately 6 to 15 feet below the ground
surface, and in the A-5 Area from ground surface to approximately 8 feet below ground surface,
will be classified as Contaminated Soils and will be removed from the Site for off-Site disposal.
Soils in the Low pH Area from approximately 4 to 15 feet below the ground surface will be
treated in-place using in-situ solidification/stabilization (ISS) procedures and are therefore not
included as part of this EMMP.
Large-diameter debris encountered during the excavation and handling of Overburden Soils will
be segregated from excavated soils and placed in a “clean” large diameter debris stockpile for off-
Site recycling or disposal. Large-diameter debris encountered during the excavation and handling
of Contaminated Soils will be placed in a “contaminated” large diameter debris stockpile within
the CES-2 or A-5 Materials Management Areas (MMAs). This contaminated large diameter
debris will be cleaned to remove soil from the surface of the debris and, after cleaning, moved to
the “clean” large diameter debris stockpile for off-Site recycling or disposal.
1
The goal of this EMMP is to provide for the proper classification and handling of these materials.
Excavated material will be segregated and either reused in appropriate on-Site areas or removed
from the Site, depending on the results of pre-classification and/or laboratory analyses.
Excavation. Transport, and Stockpiling Procedures
Specific procedures will be employed while managing excavated materials to limit potential
impacts to human health and the environment. This will be accomplished by appropriate security
measures, housekeeping techniques, stockpile management, equipment decontamination,
monitoring, and dust control.
Specific requirements for these components of the EMMP are presented in Section 3.00.
3.00 EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING, AND TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURES
To reduce potential impacts to human health and the environment during the performance of
remedial actions, specific procedures will be employed during the excavation, stockpiling, and
transportation of materials from the Site. These procedures include security measures, stockpile
management, equipment decontamination, monitoring, and dust control.
Air monitoring for airborne particulates (dust) will be conducted prior to excavation to provide a
baseline assessment and will continue throughout all phases of work, including while excavations
are open and/or soil is stockpiled on-Site. Dust monitoring, dust suppression, and covering of
stockpiles with polyethylene tarps will continue during all remedial actions which disturb soil at
the Site. These procedures will also be in practice when dealing with clean materials and off-Site
fill (if necessary) to help alleviate potential community concerns during construction.
3.10 SITE SECURITY
Temporary chain-link fencing will be provided along the entire project area perimeter prior to the
commencement of intrusive activities on the property. Chain-link fencing will be a minimum of
6 feet high. Access gates will be equipped with keyed locks. Gates will remain closed
throughout the duration of the work except when equipment is entering or exiting the property,
and will be locked at the end of each workday. Only authorized vehicles will be permitted access
to the Site.
Exclusion Zones (EZ) and Support/Contamination Reduction Zones will be established to control
exposures of unprotected personnel and the migration of contamination due to tracking by
personnel and/or equipment. Access to the Exclusion Zones and Support/Contamination
Reduction Zones will be controlled by Site personnel and will be delineated using caution tape,
orange pylons, and/or other markers designated for easy visibility in a construction zone. A
Standard Operating Procedure for vehicle contamination is provided in Attachment 1.
3.20 STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
Overburden Soils and Contaminated Soils will be segregated and placed within the MMAs.
Stockpiles of Contaminated Soil will be placed on 20-mil reinforced polyethylene sheeting and
covered with 10-mil reinforced polyethylene sheeting when not in use. Stockpiles of Overburden
Soils will be placed directly on existing surface soils but will be covered with 10-mil reinforced
polyethylene sheeting.
2
Stockpiled large diameter debris from Overburden Soils will be stockpiled outside of the MMA
on the existing ground surface.
Stockpiled large diameter debris from Contaminated Soils will be initially stockpiled within the
MMA on 20-mil reinforced polyethylene sheeting and covered with 10-mil reinforced
polyethylene sheeting when not in use. The large diameter debris will be brush-cleaned free of
loose and adhering soil material. Following cleaning, the large diameter debris will be moved to
the “clean" large diameter debris stockpile.
Minimum stockpile handling criteria are as follows:
1. No material will be removed from the stockpile staging area without suitable segregation,
stockpiling, classification, and completion of a Materials Tracking Record.
2. Excavation, material handling, and stockpiling will be performed in a manner which
prevents the mixing of Overburden Soils and Contaminated Soils, including mixing of
large diameter debris segregated from those soil materials.
3. The transfer of materials from the excavations to the MMAs will be conducted in such a
manner as to limit the spread of contaminated or potentially contaminated materials
across the Site or the MMAs.
4. The MMAs will be secured with orange fencing to limit unauthorized entry and to limit
the contact of workmen and other passers-by with stockpiled materials. The MMAs will
be visibly marked with appropriate signs warning of potential hazards. No stockpile shall
exceed 10 feet in height, and no Contaminated Soil stockpile shall exceed 500 cubic
yards in volume. Overburden Soil stockpiles will not be limited in height or size but will
require covering.
Requirements for stockpiling and maintaining potentially contaminated soil in the MMAs
include:
1. Contaminated Soil will be placed on 20-mil-thick liner over existing soil. Stockpiles of
Contaminated Soil will be segregated and surrounded by straw bales to delineate 500
cubic yard cells. Liners and covers will be placed so as to provide a 1-foot overlap.
2. The Contaminated Soil stockpiles will be covered prior to inclement weather and at the
end of each workday with a minimum 10-mil-thick reinforced black polyethylene cover.
The cover will be weighted with sand bags for ballast. The cover will be inspected daily
during construction workdays and maintained throughout the stockpile period to control
water entering the stockpiled materials and to limit dust generation.
3. Overburden Soils will be placed directly on existing soil within the MMA. The
Overburden Soil stockpiles will be covered prior to inclement weather and at the end of
each workday with a minimum 10-mil-thick reinforced black polyethylene cover. The
cover will be weighted with sand bags for ballast. The cover will be inspected daily
during construction workdays and maintained throughout the stockpile period to control
water entering the stockpiled materials and to limit dust generation.
3
4. Contaminated large diameter debris will be placed on 20-mil-thick liner over existing
soil. Stockpiles of Contaminated large diameter debris will be segregated by straw bales
to delineate 100 cubic yard cells. Liners and covers will be placed so as to provide a 1-
foot overlap. These stockpiles will be required to be covered with a minimum 10-mil-
thick reinforced black polyethylene cover. The cover will be inspected daily during
construction workdays and maintained throughout the stockpile period to control water
entering the stockpiled materials and to limit dust generation.
5. Non-contaminated large diameter debris will be placed on the existing ground surface
outside of the MMA. If dust propagation from this material is observed, then the
placement of a minimum 10-mil-thick reinforced black polyethylene cover will be
required.
6. Stockpile areas will be graded to shed water, and stormwater runoff will be diverted away
from stockpiled material.
7. Any breach in the integrity of the stockpile pad or cover system will be promptly
repaired. Soil that erodes from the stockpile will be collected and the area screened at a
frequency of 1 sample per 2,500 square feet to confirm that the residual levels of
contaminants are below the relevant Site Cleanup Levels for the area. Soil which does
not meet the relevant Cleanup Level (Method 1 S-2/GW-2 and S-2/GW-3 Risk
Standards) will be excavated and relocated to the Contaminated Soil Stockpiles.
In addition. Contaminated Soils that require stabilization for off-Site disposal as non¬
characteristic hazardous waste due to one or more exceedances of toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure (TCLP) testing will be stabilized within the MMA as described in Section
4.00 below.
4.00 CONTAMINATED SOIL STABILIZATION
If pre-characterization environmental testing indicates that concentrations of leachable
(TCLP) arsenic and/or lead above Characteristic Hazardous Waste levels are present within
Contaminated Soils, then stabilization to reduce the leachability of those metals will be
performed.
Stabilization of Contaminated Soils will consist of mixing stockpiled soils with a stabilizing
reagent (Maectite© or approved equivalent). Mixing will include application of the reagent
solution (fluid) in 500-cubic yard cells of the stockpiled Contaminated Soil in the MMA.
Mixing will be performed using excavators and front end loaders within the MMA.
Following mixing, the material will be allowed to “cure” for the period recommended by the
reagent manufacturer (typically three days). Following curing, the material will be re¬
sampled to measure concentrations of leachable arsenic and/or lead. If measured
concentrations are below Characteristic Hazardous Waste levels, the material will be
designated for off-Site disposal. If measured concentrations are above Characteristic
Hazardous Waste levels, additional reagent and mixing will occur, followed by the same
curing and sampling procedures.
4
5.00 EXCAVATED MATERIAL OFF-SITE DISPOSAL
Excavated materials designated for off-Site disposal will include Contaminated Soils excavated
from the A-5 and CES-2 areas. This includes both stabilized and non-stabilized Contaminated
Soils.
Contaminated Soils will be loaded into tractor trailer vehicles within the MMA using excavators
and front end loaders. Filling of trailers will be performed up to the legal weight limit for
transport on roads and highways along the Traffic Management Plan traffic route.
Prior to loading, vehicles will be observed to confirm the trailers are equipped with the following
equipment/materials in good condition and good working order.
1. Trailer bed liner material consisting of 20-mil reinforced polyethylene sheeting with
overlapping cover that drapes over the exterior sides of the trailer during loading and then
is used as an initial cover over the Contaminated Soil within the trailer.
2. An accordion-style retractable vinyl trailer cover (Mountain Tarp N Go Anti Pollution
Cable System Cover or approved equivalent) capable of covering the full length and
width of the trailer over the folded bedliner. The cover shall be in good repair without
tears, holes, gaps, or any other openings that may allow dust/particulates to leave the
trailer during transport.
3. A locking tailgate in good working order that is firmly secured both during loading and
after the loading of the trailer is completed.
Prior to departure, the LSP or his designated representative will confirm that the operator of the
transport vehicle has been briefed on the appropriate traffic/travel route from the Site to the
disposal facility and is equipped with the appropriate soil transport and disposal tracking
paperwork.
Soil disposal transport vehicles, after being loaded and checked for security, will then proceed to
the vehicle decontamination area for decontamination. Refer to Attachment 1 to this EMMP for
additional information regarding vehicle decontamination procedures.
5
ATTACHMENT 1
VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Construction vehicles that work within the Exclusion Zones (EZ) of the Site will be cleaned of
soil and Site material at the Site vehicle decontamination pad (VDP) within the Contamination
Reduction/Support Zone prior to leaving the EZ.
Decontamination Pad
One VDP will be constructed on Site in each of the areas depicted on Figure 3 of the RAM Plan.
The VDP will be approximately 15 feet wide by 50 feet long and will consist of a 30-mil HDPE
liner bedded on sand gently sloped to one comer, with 6 inches of %-inch crushed stone placed
across the entire surface. The extended sides of the liner will be positioned upwards, supported by
parallel rows of hay bales, to facilitate the containment and collection of wash water at the VDP.
Clean water for decontamination activities will be supplied by an approved municipal hydrant
tap. Water from the VDP will be gravity directed to a 300-gallon holding sump that will be
positioned in the ground at one comer of the VDP.
Vehicle Decontamination Procedure
Prior to departing the EZ, vehicles will be shovel scraped and broomed/brushed free of accessible
soil and Site material. Particular emphasis will be placed on ground contact portions of vehicles
such as buckets, wheels, tracks and booms. Vehicles will then be positioned on the VDP and
decontaminated using a high pressure water sprayer to remove visible soil and Site material.
Longer vehicles will be decontaminated in segments as they are advanced through the VDP. *
During periods of non-use the VDP will be covered with a polyethylene tarp to minimize the
accumulation of precipitation in the sump.
Disposal
Water collected in the VDP sump will be pumped to either a temporary on-Site treatment system
used for construction dewatering, or a licensed waste hauler for proper off-Site disposal.
Following the completion of Site earthwork activities, the VDP liner and crushed stone, along
with any trapped sediment, will be tested according to the EMMP protocol, and then disposed of
at an approved off-site facility or, if possible, reused on Site.
The primary purpose of the VDP is to decontaminate earthwork and construction equipment prior
to leaving the Site. To the extent possible, equipment will be committed to the respective EZs to
minimize the use of the VDP and the generation of waste.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-10.DELARAM Plan - Pre-Construction\App H - EMMP\Excavated Material Management Plan
draft Wynn Everett 2015-02-26.doc
6
OZVj)
Proactive by Design
APPENDIX J
PM10 RISK EVALUATION TABLES
Analyte
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 16
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
T richloroethytene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, t,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-C 8 Aliphatics
C 9 -C 12 Aliphatics
C g -C 10 Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPI
Cg-C 18 Aliphatics
Cig-Cag Aliphatics
C 11 -C 22 Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Method
8260
Units
mg/kg
MAVPH
8270
MAE PH
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
B225
B225-S1(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
MCI 7003-24
12/18/2012
GEI
B221
B221-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-16
12/18/2012
GEI
B221
B500
6-8
Accutest
MC17003-35
12/18/2012
GEI
B222
B222-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-18
12/18/2012
GEI
B223
B223-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-20
12/18/2012
GEI
B224
B224-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-22
12/18/2012
GEI
B225
B225-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-25
12/18/2012
GEI
tverett, Massachi
B226
B226-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-27
12/18/2012
GEI
jsetts
B227
B227-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-29
12/18/2012
GEI
B228
B228-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-31
12/18/2012
GEI
B229
B229-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-33
12/18/2012
GEI
A-5-4
A-5-4(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
A- 5-5
A-5-5(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
B221
B221-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-17
12/18/2012
GEI
B222
B222-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-19
12/18/2012
GEI
B223
B223-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MC17003-21
12/18/2012
GEI
B224
B224-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-23
12/18/2012
GEI
B225
B225-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-26
12/18/2012
GEI
B226
B226-S2(8-10
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-28
12/18/2012
GEI
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
-
-
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
“
—
—
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
-
—
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
__
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
.
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
-
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
:
:
:
“
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
~
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
_
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
~
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
__
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
V
—
—
““
—
-
-
-
-
-
--
—
_
_
_
—
—
“
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
_
~
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
“
—
—
—
—
-
-
~
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
__
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
"
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
“
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
—
—
~
—
—
~
“
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
—
—
_
I
:
“
—
—
—
—
“
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
—
—
—
“
—
~
—
—
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
„ _
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
__.
_
—
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
__
_
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-- —
—
—
—
:\ 170 , 000 - 179 ,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2016 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data HighlighttSorf Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Analyte
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
Arodor 1254
Arodor 1260
Arodor 1262
Arodor 1016
Arodor 1221
Arodor 1232
Arodor 1242
Arodor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
Total Pestiddes
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Other
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, reactive
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a ,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methytnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Method
8082
8081
8151
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
Units
mg/kg
B225
B225-S1(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
MCI 7003-24
12/18/2012
GEI
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
B221
B221-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-16
12/18/2012
GEI
412
9310
B221
B500
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-35
12/18/2012
GEI
B222
B222-S2(S-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-18
12/18/2012
GEI
783
1150
981
522
396
B223
B223-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-20
12/18/2012
GEI
18.1
79.1
B224
B224-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-22
12/18/2012
GEI
114
17.5
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 16
4/15/2015
B225
B225-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-25
12/18/2012
GEI
B226
B226-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-27
12/18/2012
GEI
23.9
288
211
814
B227
B227-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-29
12/18/2012
GEI
462
225
B228
B228-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-31
12/18/2012
GEI
8.9
48.9
B229
B229-S2(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
MCI 7003-33
12/18/2012
GEI
896
43300
A-5-4
A-5-5
B221
B222
B223
B224
B225
B226
A-5-4(6-8)
A-5-5(6-8)
B221-S2(8-10)
B222-S2(8-10)
B223-S2(8-10)
B224-S2(8-10)
B225-S2(8-10)
B226-S2(8-10)
6-8
6-8
8-10
8-10
8-10
8-10
8-10
8-10
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
MC17003-17
MCI 7003-19
MCI 7003-21
MCI 7003-23
MCI 7003-26
MCI 7003-28
3/19/2013
3/19/2013
12/18/2012
12/18/2012
12/18/2012
12/18/2012
12/18/2012
12/18/2012
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
__
_
15.9
73.6
43.2
8
236
4.3
72.9
107
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
93.6
1180
5.3
89.1
117
9.4
112
43.9
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
' —
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
“
—
-
-
-
—
_
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
— %
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
~
—
—
-
-
Notes:
1. In general, analytes deteded in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not deteded. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2. ■'<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4. = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were colleded.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
A. The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum deteded
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondeteded sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DeiivationVSoil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
table 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
MAVPH
8270
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 8260
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
T richloroethylene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-Ce Aliphatics
C 9 -C 12 Aliphatics
Cg-C-io Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPij MAEPH
Cg-C! 8 Aliphatics
Cig-Cgg Aliphatics
C-n-C^ Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
I Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)f!uoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
I Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons _
Method
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
File No. 171521.10
Page 3 of 16
4/15/2015
B227
QOOQ
Everett, Massachusetts
B227-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MC17003-30
12/18/2012
GEI
B228-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-32
12/18/2012
GEI
B229
B229-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-34
12/18/2012
GEI
A-5-4
A-5-4(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
A-5-5
A-5-5(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
A-5-4
A-5-4(10-12)
10-12
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
S-15
S-15
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-15
6/29/2004
W&C
S-16
S-16
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-16
6/29/2004
w&c
S-17
S-17
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-17
6/29/2004
W&C
S-19
S-19
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-19
6/29/2004
W&C
S-26
S-26
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-26
6/29/2004
W&C
S-26
S-26 Dup
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-27
6/29/2004
W&C
B217
B217-SI
0-2
Accutest
MCI 7003-10
12/17/2012
GEI
BOR-11
BOR11-050301
0-3
ALPHA
L0104072-17
5/3/2001
TTR
BOR-12
BOR 12-050301
0-3
ALPHA
L0104072-18
5/3/2001
TTR
CES-2-1
CES-2-1(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
SHORE-3
SHORE-3(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
SHORE-4
SHORE-4(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_.
_
__ .
<0.46
<0.51
—
—
--
-
-
-
-
-
<0.046
< 0.051
-
-
-
-
—
~
-
-
-
-
-
—
<0.46
<0.51
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
<0.46
<0.51
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.070
< 0.076
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.046
< 0.051
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.23
<0.25
-
-
-
-
~
—
~
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
<0.23
<0.25
—
-
-
-
—
~
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.23
0.28
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.046
< 0.051
-
-
-
-
—
~
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
< 0.070
< 0.076
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.046
< 0.051
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.23
<0.25
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.23
<0.25
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.046
0.075
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
<1.86
<2.03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
< 1.86
<2.03
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<1.86
<2.03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
:
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
__
—
118
<8.33
< 15.2
15.4
313
< 13.9
—
< 10.6
<11.1
_
—
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
477
104
27.1
1670
1790
137
-
39.1
117
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
117
52.4
35
252
456
< 13.9
-
19.9
208
—
—
—
—
_
_
__
—
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
—■
—
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
__
_
—
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
_
_
__
—
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
__
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
__
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
<2.11
0.438
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
<2.11
0.548
< 0.758
< 0.758
2.19
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
_
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
<1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
—
—
_
<2.11
<0.417
< 0.758
< 0.758
< 1.79
< 0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
<2.11
0.524
< 0.758
< 0.758
1.94
< 0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
—
-
-
-
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
—
~
—*
_
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
"
~
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
““
J:\170,000-179, 999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data Highlight\Sotl Data
QA: GL Date: 4/15/15
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
File No. 171521.10
Page 4 of 16
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
B227
B227-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MC17003-30
12/18/2012
GEI
B228
B228-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-32
12/18/2012
GEI
B229
B229-S2(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
MCI 7003-34
12/18/2012
GEI
A-5-4
A-5-4(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
A-5-5
A-5-5(8-10)
8-10
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
A-5-4
A-5-4(10-12)
10-12
Accutest
3/19/2013
GEI
S-15
S-15
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-15
6/29/2004
W&C
Everett, Massachu
S-16
S-16
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-16
6/29/2004
W&C
setts
S-17
S-17
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-17
6/29/2004
W&C
S-19
S-19
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-19
6/29/2004
W&C
S-26
S-26
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-26
6/29/2004
W&C
S-26
S-26 Dup
0-0.5
Alpha
L0407197-27
6/29/2004
W&C
B217
B217-SI
0-2
Accutest
MCI 7003-10
12/17/2012
GEI
BOR-11
BOR 11-050301
0-3
ALPHA
L0104072-17
5/3/2001
TTR
BOR-12
BOR 12-050301
0-3
ALPHA
L0104072-18
5/3/2001
TTR
CES-2-1
CES-2-1(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
SHORE-3
SHORE-3(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
SHORE-4
SHORE-4(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
4/1
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
Analyt^^
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Method
Units
Aroclor 1248
mg/kg
Aroclor 1254
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
Aroclor 1260
~
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
_
Aroclor 1262
—
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
_
Aroclor 1016
—
~
-
-
—
—
_
1
Aroclor 1221
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
Aroclor 1232
—
—
—
-
-
| -
—
__
_
_
_
_
_
Aroclor 1242
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
,
_
_
_
_
Aroclor 1268
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
__
_
_
_
__
_
Total PCBs
“
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
Pesticides
8081
mg/kg
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Total Pesticides
-
—
Herbicides
8151
mg/kg
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Herbicides
“
Metals, Total
6010
mg/kg
~~
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Antimony
6010
—
Arsenic
Barium
6010
6010
11
<0.97
13.9
Ill
18.5
9.9
<2.5
3.9
<2.5
3.6
<2.3
4.8
<2.2
3.3
2.9
14
<2.1
3.7
18.6
3.2
19
—
8.1
39.6
5.7
Beryllium
6010
—
18
33
33
19
170
33
-
19
68
-
—
—
—
Cadmium
6010
—
0.26
0.26
0.23
0.24
0.4
0.26
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
Chromium
6010
~~
< 0.50
<0.50
<0.45
<0.44
6.2
<0.42
-
<0.42
<0.44
-
~
—
—
Copper
6010
~
7.8
16
40
10
76
19
-
20
18
-
-
-
-
Iron
6010
_
_
_
~
—
—
—
—
Lead
Manganese
6010
6010
59.2
8.2
363
30.9
30.2
49.3
18
22
240
16
590
15
118
<2.1
490
50.4
-
-
-
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
7471
6010
6010
-
-
—
—
-
<0.1
7.1
<2.5
<0.10
14
<2.5
<0.08
26
<2.3
0.09
9.7
<2.2
0.36
61
<2.1
<0.08
16
<2.1
-
<0.24
<4.2
0.29
<44
-
-
-
-
Silver
6010
-
-
-
-
—
—
<0.50
<0.50
<0.45
<0.44
<0.43
<0.42
<0.42
1.4
Thallium
6010
-
-
-
—
—
—
<2.5
<2.5
<11
<2 2
<11
<2.1
Vanadium
6010
-
-
-
—
—
—
22
33
35
23
44
39
Zinc
Other
6010
—
—
38
94
350
50
430
530
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cyanide, total
mg/kg
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
,
Cyanide, reactive
mg/kg
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
mg/kg
Acenaphthene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
Acenaphthylene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
_
.
Anthracene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
Benzo(a)anthracene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
Benzo(a)pyrene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
—
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
_
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
_
...
__
Benzo(e)pyrene
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
• -
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
_
_
Benzo(ghi)perylene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
_
_
_
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
_
_
Chrysene
—
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
0.438
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
_
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
—
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
—
—
_
_
Fluoranthene
—
—
-
-
-
-
<2.11
0.548
<0.758
<0.758 .
2.19
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
_
—
_
__
Fluorene
—
—
—
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
_
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
-
—
— *
—
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
-
-
—
—
—
—
<0.53
<5.6
-
-
—
—
Methylnaphthalene. 2-
-
-
-
-
-
“
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
-
—
—
—
Naphthalene
Phpnpnthrpnp
_
—
—
—
—
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.23
0.28
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
<2.11
<0.417
<0.758
<0.758
<1.79
<0.694
-
<0.53
<5.6
_
_
_
Pyrene
-
-
-
-
<2.11
0.524
<0.758
<0.758
1.94
<0.694
~
<0.53
<5.6
-
-
-
-
Notes:
1 In general, analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2. "<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
A. The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999VI71521 \171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationYSoil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
File No. 171521.10
Page 5 of 16
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
T richloroethylene
Tnmethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-Cg Aliphatics
Cg-C -12 Aliphatics
Cg-C-jQ Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a ,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPI
Cg-C 18 Aliphatics
C-ig-Cgg Aliphatics
CH-C 22 Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Method
8260
Units
mg/kg
MAVPH
8270
MAEPH
SHORE-9
SHORE-9(0-3)
0-3
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CES-2-A
TFQ.O.R
Everett, Massachu
setts
4/'
CES02A0-4
0-4
Con-test
05B47827
12/7/2005
TTR
CES 02B 0-4
0-4
Con-test
05B47829
12/7/2005
TTR
Cfcb-2-0
CES 02C 0-4
0-4
Con-test
05B47833
12/7/2005
TTR
CES-2-D
CES 02D 0-4
0-4
Con-test
05B47831
12/7/2005
TTR
TP301
TP301-A
0-5
4/19/2013
GEI
C-14
C-14 @ 4'
4
R.l. Analytical
5/31/2007
Williams
CES-2-A
CES 02A 4-8
4-8
Con-test
05B47828
12/7/2005
TTR
CES-2-B
CES 02B 4-8
4-8
Con-test
05B47830
12/7/2005
TTR
CES-2-C
CES 02C 4-8
4-8
Con-test
05B47834
12/7/2005
TTR
CES-2-D
CES 02D 4-8
4-8
Con-test
05B47832
12/7/2005
TTR
CES-4
CES-4 / 5-7
5-7
ALPHA
L9609510-07
12/18/1996
CES
RIZ-1
RIZ1 - 032601
5-7
ALPHA
L0102800-01
3/26/2001
TTR
B215
B215-S2
5-7
Accutest
MCI 7003-8
12/17/2012
GEI
CES-TP-4
TP-4
5-8
Inchcape
30878-4
8/25/1995
CES
SHORE-3
SHORE-3(5-10)
5-10
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
SHORE-4
SHORE-4(5-10)
5-10
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(5-10)
5-10
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
SHORE-9
SHORE-9(5-10)
5-10
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
0.1
_
"
-
-
-
—
0.002
-
—
—
—
~
—
—
-
-
-
—
0.025
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
0.8
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.007
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
0.014
—
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
~~
-
-
-
-
-
0.022
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
0.002
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
0.003
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
< 0.007
—
—
—
—
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
.
_
“
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
—*
~
—
-
-
-
0.002
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
I
—
—
~
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
"
—
—
“
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
_
_
_
<0.19
—
—
—
"
“
<0.19
-
-
-
—
<0.19
_
_
_
_
—
“
—
<0.19
-
-
-
-
<0.19
_
_
_
.
—
<0.19
--
-
-
-
<0.19
—
_
_
_
—
"
"
<0.19
-
-
-
—
<0.19
—
_
__
—
<0.19
—
—
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
—
_
<0.19
—
—
—
<0.19
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
—
_
_
,
—
-
<0.37
-
-
-
—
<0.37
—
_
_
_
_
—
-
<0.19
-
-
-
—
<0.19
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
—
<0.19
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
<0.37
-
-
-
—
<0.37
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
—
_
_
_
_
-
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
—
_
_
_
—
<0.19
—
-
--
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
<0.19
—
—
—
—
<0.19
_
_
I
-
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
—
<0.19
—
—
—
—
_
_
-
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
<0.19
—
—
—
_
_
_
~
<0.19
—
—
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<22
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
I
-
-
-
-
-
110
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
-
-
-
-
"
<0.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
<0.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
__
-
-
-
—
0.4
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
-
—
1.7
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
1.1
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
—
1.7
—
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
-
“
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
-
-
1.4
—
—
—
“
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
-
-
-
1.8
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
0.4
—
—
-
- •
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
--
-
-
4.2
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.4
—
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
~
-
0.5
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.4
—
~
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.4
—
—
—
-
“
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
2.1
—
—
~
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
3.4
“ ;
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
<210
< 180
—
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
<210
< 180
-
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
<210
< 180
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
<210
< 180
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
360
280
—
—
—
_
-
-
-
-
-
“
-
—
- I -
360
280
30
-
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVSoil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Analyte
Method
Units
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1262
Arodor 1016
Arodor 1221
Arodor 1232
Arodor 1242
Arodor 1268
Total PCBs
8082
mg/kg
Pesticides
Total Pestiddes
8081
mg/kg
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
8151
mg/kg
Metals, Total
6010
mg/kg
Antimony
6010
Arsenic
6010
Barium
6010
Beryllium
6010
Cadmium
6010
Chromium
6010
Copper
6010
Iron
6010
Lead
6010
Manganese
6010
Mercury
7471
Nickel
6010
Selenium
6010
Silver
6010
Thallium
6010
Vanadium
6010
Zinc
Other
6010
Cyanide, total
mg/kg
Cyanide, reactive
mg/kg
Analytes Reported with Multiple Methods/
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
mg/kg
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
table 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 6 of 16
4/15/2015
Everett, Massachusetts
oMUKh-y
CES-2-A
CES-2-B
CES-2-C
CES-2-D
TP301
C-14
CES-2-A
CES-2-B
CES-2-C
CES-2-D
CES-4
RIZ-1
B215
CES-TP-4
SHORE-3
SHORE-4
SHORE-8
SHORE-9
oHUKt-y(U-o)
n ^
CES 02A0-4
CES 02B 0-4
CES 02C 0-4
CES 02D 0-4
TP301-A
C-14 @ 4’
CES 02A 4-8
CES 02B 4-8
CES 02C 4-8
CES02D4-8
CES-4/5-7
RIZ1 - 032601
B215-S2
TP-4
SHORE-3(5-10)
SHORE-4(5-10)
SHORE-8(5-10)
SHORE-9(5-10)
U-O
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-5
4
4-8
4-8
4-8
4-8
5-7
5-7
5-7
5-8
5-10
5-10
5-10
5-10
Accutest
Con-test
Con-test
Con-test
Con-test
R.l. Analytical
Con-test
Con-test
Con-test
Con-test
ALPHA
ALPHA
Accutest
Inchcape
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
05B47827
05B47829
05B47833
05B47831
05B47828
05B47830
05B47834
05B47832
L9609510-07
L0102800-01
MCI 7003-8
30878-4
o/14/zUlo
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
4/19/2013
5/31/2007
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
12/7/2005
12/18/1996
3/26/2001
12/17/2012
8/25/1995
3/15/2013
3/14/2013
3/14/2013
3/14/2013
otl
TTR
TTR
TTR
TTR
GEI
Williams
TTR
TTR
TTR
TTR
CES
TTR
GEI
CES
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
-
-
~
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.12
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
—
—
0.339
-
-
-
-
“
—
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
0.203
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.12
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
~
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.662
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
13.8
150
135
270
38.9
101
24
77.1
26.2
10.1
73.5
9.4
6.7
—
-
52.4
95.4
186
464
-
-
-
-
-
100
-
-
-
-
30
16
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
<0.26
—
—
~
—
<0.85
<0.70
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
21
—
—
—
—
24
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29.7
-
—
“
—
—
-
1120
307
3520
67.8
949
380
176
36.4
32.7
541
130
31
-
-
-
5490
1620
108
-
-
-
-
-
-
14.2
-
-
-
-
<0.53
<0.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
_
,
_
I
29
_
_
_
_
<11
<8.8
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
< 1.1
-
-
-
-
<0.85
<0.70
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.23
-
-
-
-
-
- '
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
—
—
"
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.19
<0.4
—
—
<0.19
—
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
_
_
_
—
<0.19
—
<0.4
—
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
<0.19
—
0.4
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
--
-
-
“
—
_
—
<0.19
—
1.7
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
“
_
_
—
<0.19
—
1.1
-
-
<0.19
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
—
—
<0.19
-
1.7
-
-
<0.19
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
“
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
<0.19
—
0.7
-
-
<0.19
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
<0.19
—
1.4
-
-
<0.19
-
”
-
—
—
—
—
.
_
<0.19
—
1.8
-
-
<0.19
-
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
<0.19
—
0.4
-
-
<0.19
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
<0.19
—
4.2
-
-
<0.19
—
—
—
—
_
_
<0.19
—
<0.4
-
-
<0.19
~
“
—
—
~
~
—
_
_
<0.19
-
0.5
-
-
<0.19
~
—
—
—
””
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
<0.19
—
<0.4
-
-
<0.19
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
<0.19
—
<0.4
-
-
<0.19
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
<0.19
—
2.1
-
-
<0.19
—
“
—
—
—
~
<0.19
—
3.4
-
-
<0.19
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
^general, analyte s detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2 -<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5 . ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6 . mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area . , . .
a ThPanalvte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listedTo represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999\171 521 \ 1 71521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data HighlighUSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 7 of 16
4/15/2015
Analyte
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
8260
MAVPH
8270
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methytene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-Ce Aliphatics
C 9 -C 12 Aliphatics
C g -C 10 Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Bertzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPF| MAEPH
Cg-C-ie Aliphatics
Cig-C* Aliphatics
Ci!-C22 Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Method
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Everett, Massachusetts
1 roUl
TP^ni r
TP302
C-22
C-22
CES-2-1
CES-2-2
B217
CES-2
c-21
C-21
CES-2-1
CES-2-2
CES-2-3
BOR-103
MW301D
MW302D
CES-2
MW301D
MW302D
5-10
1P302-B
C-22 @ 6'
TP C-22 6'
CES-2-1(6-8)
CES-2-2(6-8)
B217-S2
CES-2/7-9
C-21 @ 8’
TP C-21 8’
CES-2-1 (8-10)
CES-2-2(8-12)
CES-2-3(8-12)
BOR 103 9'
MW30 IDS 1(0-5)
MW302DS 1(0-7)
CES-2/9-11
MW301DS1(5-16)
MW302DS1(7-14)
%>~1 U
6
6
6-8
6-8
6-9
7-9
8
8
8-10
8-12
8-12
9
9-9.5
9-9.5
9-11
9.5-11
9.5-11
R.l. Analytical
Spectrum
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
ALPHA
R.l. Analytical
Spectrum
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Con-test
Accutest
Accutest
ALPHA
Accutest
Accutest
4/19/2013
SA63689-05
MCI 7003-11
L9609510-03
SA63689-04
06B01605
MC21667-1
MC21667-14
L9609510-04
MC21667-2
MC21667-15
4/19/2013
5/31/2007
5/31/2007
3/15/2013
3/15/2013
12/17/2012
12/17/1996
5/31/2007
5/31/2007
3/15/2013
3/15/2013
3/20/2013
1/13/2006
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
12/17/1996
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
GEI
GEI
Williams
TTR
GEI
GEI
GEI
CES
Williams
TTR
GEI
GEI
GEI
TTR
GEI
GEI
CES
GEI
GEI
-
—
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
__
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
”
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
“
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
—
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
_
_
_
-
_
_
_
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
:
—
_
:
:
—
—
—
—
_
—.
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
“
—
-
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
~
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
<23
-
-
-
-
< 195
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
—
—
—
340
-
-
-
-
< 195
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
—
—
—
180
-
-
-
-
219
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
<0.5
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
_
<0.5
-
-
-
-
<0.7
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
—
0.6
—
-
-
-
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
, .
__
—
—
2.1
-
-
--
-
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
—
1.2
—
-
-
1.1
—
-
“
—
~
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
-
—
1.3
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
"
0.9
_
_
—
—
<0.7
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
3
-
--
-
-
1.5
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
2.6
-
-
-
—
1.8
—
-
~
—
.
_
1.1
—
-
--
-
<0.7
-
-
-
-
-
—
, .
_
4.4
—
-
-
-
3.2
-
-
-
-
-
_
<0.5
—
—
-
-
<0.7
-
-
-
-
-
:
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
1.1
-
“
<0.7
—
“
““
—
-
-
—
~
<0.5
_
~
-
<0.7
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
0.6
—
-
-
-
<0.7
-
-
-
-
-
—
~
3.4
—
-
-
-
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
3.7
-
-
-
-
2.8
~
—
—
—
—
1
—
“
—
—
—
-
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
<140
-
-
—
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
< 140
—
—
—
-
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
< 140
-
—
-
—
—
_.
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<140
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
= ====
-
J:\170,000-179, 999 \ 171 521V171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data HighlighttSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Sample Location
TP301 1
TP302~~
Sample ID
TP301-B
TP302-B
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
5-10
5-10
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
4/19/2013
4/19/2013
GFI
Consultant
GEI
Analyte
Method
Units
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
8082
mg/kg
-
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1262
~
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
8081
mg/kg
_
Total Pesticides
Herbicides
8151
mg/kg
_
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
6010
mg/kg
_
Antimony
6010
_
Arsenic
6010
1050
1490
Barium
6010
_
Beryllium
6010
_
Cadmium
6010
_
Chromium
6010
_
Copper
6010
_
_
Iron
6010
_
_
Lead
6010
1730
169
Manganese
6010
—
_
Mercury
7471
—
_
Nickel
6010
—
_
Selenium
6010
_
_
Silver
6010
—
_
Thallium
6010
—
_
Vanadium
6010
—
_
Zinc
6010
—
_
Other
—
Cyanide, total
mg/kg
—
—
Cyanide, reactive
mg/kg
-
-
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
mg/kg
Acenaphthene
-
-
Acenaphthylene
-
-
Anthracene
-
-
Benzo(a)anthracene
-
-
Benzo(a)pyrene
-
-
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
-
-
Benzo(e)pyrene
-
-
Benzo(ghi)perylene
-
-
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
-
-
Chrysene
-
—
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
—
—
Fluoranthene
-
—
Fluorene
-
-
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
-
—
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
—
—
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
—
—
Naphthalene
—
—
Phenanthrene
—
—
Pyrene
—
C-22
C-22 @ 6'
6
R.l. Analytical
5/31/2007
Williams
C-22
TP C-22 6'
6
Spectrum
SA63689-05
5/31/2007
TTR
570
650
2.1
4.2
17000
8.41
110
18
712
24700
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 8 of 16
4/15/2015
CES-2-1
CES-2-1(6-8)
6-8
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
457
CES-2-2
B217
CES-2
C 21
C-21
CES-2-1
CES-2-2
CES-2-3
BOR-103
MW301D
MW302D
CES-2
MW301D
MW302D
CES-2-2(6-8)
B217-S2
CES-2 / 7-9
C-21 @ 8'
TP C-21 8 '
CES-2-1(8-10)
CES-2-2(8-12)
CES-2-3(8-12)
BOR 103 9’
MW301DS 1(0-5)
MW302DS1(0-7)
CES-2/9-11
MW301DS1(5-16)
MW302DS1(7-14)
6-8
6 - 9
7-9
8
8
8-10
8-12
8-12
9
9-9.5
9-9.5
9-11
9.5-11
9.5-11
Accutest
Accutest
ALPHA
R.l. Analytical
Spectrum
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Con-test
Accutest
Accutest
ALPHA
Accutest
Accutest
3/15/2013
MCI 7003-11
L9609510-03
SA63689-04
06B01605
MC21667-1
MC21667-14
L9609510-04
MC21667-2
MC21667-15
12/17/2012
12/17/1996
5/31/2007
5/31/2007
3/15/2013
3/15/2013
3/20/2013
1/13/2006
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
12/17/1996
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
GEI
GEI
CES
Williams
TTR
GEI
GEI
GEI
TTR
GEI
GEI
CES
GEI
GEI
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
<0.14
-
3.9
< 0.0346
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.14
-
<0.1
< 0.0346
—
_
_
_
__
_
_
_
-
<0.14
-
<0.1
< 0.0346
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.14
-
<0.1
0.33
—
—
—
_
—
_
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
“
<0.14
-
4.05
0.3819
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
ND
--
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
__
_
__
_
-
ND
-
-
-
—
~
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
“
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
_
—
—
166
-
180
630
-
1950
1040
3170
185
7660
246
380
6800
474
—
-
390
150
-
-
-
—
— !
—
—
6.8
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
__
_
_
_
_
—
-
18
<0.29
-
—
—
_
—
_
_
2.9
_
_
-
-
13
7.1
—
—
—
_
_
_
11
_
_
-
294
-
-
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
9.8
-
5500
1700
-
-
-
-
3770
2790
20.2
110
797
29.3
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
_
-
-
1.3
64.8
-
-
-
-
—
~
—
1.2
—
_
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
„
-
-
42
80
-
—
—
—
_
—
_
<7.2
_
-
<0.4
2.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.58
—
—
—
—
"
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
“
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
—
—
—
-
...
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
-
0.27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
<0.5
__
_
_
_
1
_
-
-
—
<0.5
—
—
—
—
<0.7
—
_
_
_
_
-
-
-
0.6
-
—
—
1.8
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
2.1
-
~
-
-
1.8
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
1.2
-
-
—
1.1
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
2.8
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
0.9
-
—
—
—
<0.7
—
_
_
_
:
-
—
3
-
-
1.5
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
—
2.6
-
-
—
—
1.8
—
_
—
_
-
-
—
1.1
-
-
—
—
<0.7
—
—
—
_
_
—
-
—
4.4
-
-
—
-
3.2
—
—
_
_
_
—
-
—
<0.5
-
-
-
—
<0.7
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
-
-
<0.7
-
-
—
—
—
-
—
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
-
—
<0.5
-
-
-
—
<0.7
—
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
0.6
-
-
—
—
<0.7
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
3.4
-
-
—
—
1.8
—
_
_
_
_
-
3.7
“
2.8
-
-
-
-
Notes:
1 In general, analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2. ”<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4. = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
A The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Soil Data HighlighUSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Sample Location
BOR-101
CES-2-1
Sample ID
BOR101 10'
CES-2-1(10-15)
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
10
10-15
Laboratory
Con-test
Accutest
Laboratory ID
06B01607
Sample Date
1/13/2006
3/15/2013
GEI
Consultant
TTR
Anal^t^
Method
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
8260
mg/kg
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethytbenzene, 1,3,5-
_
Xylene, Total
__
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
MAVPH
mg/kg
_
_
C5-C 8 Aliphatics
_
C g -C 12 Aliphatics
_
Cg-C-io Aromatics
_
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
8270
mg/kg
_
_
Acenaphthene
—
_
Acenaphthylene
—
_
Anthracene
_
_
Benzo(a)anthracene
_
_
Benzo(a)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
—
—
Benzo(e)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(ghi)perylene
—
—
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
-
—
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
—
—
Chrysene
-
—
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
-
-
Dibenzofuran
-
—
Fluoranthene
—
—
Fiuorene
—
—
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
-
-
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
-
-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
-
-
Naphthalene
-
-
Phenanthrene
-
-
Pyrene
-
-
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPh
MAEPH
mg/kg
-
—
Cg-C 18 Aliphatics
-
-
Cig-C^ Aliphatics
-
-
C11-C22 Aromatics
-
-
Acenaphthene
-
-
Acenaphthylene
—
Anthracene
—
—
Benzo(a)anthracene
—
Benzo(a)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
—
—
Benzo(e)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(ghi)perylene
—
—
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
—
Chrysene
—
Dibenzo(a ,h)anthracene
—
Fluoranthene
—
Fiuorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
—
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
—
~
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
—
Pyrene
mg/kg
—
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
—
Fuels, diesel, no 2
—
Fuel oil no 6
—
Gasoline
—
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
—
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
-
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 9 of 16
4/15/2015
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(10-15)
10-15
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
TP301
TP301-C
10-15
4/19/2013
GEI
TP302
TP302-C
10-15
4/19/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS2
11-13
Accutest
MC21667-3
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS2
11-13
Accutest
MC21667-16
6/10/2013
GEI
BOR-103
BOR103 12'
12
Con-test
06B01606
1/13/2006
TTR
CES-2-2
CES-2-2(12-14)
12-14
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
CES-2-3
CES-2-3(12-14)
12-14
Accutest
3/20/2013
GEI
SHORE-9
SHORE-9(12.5-15)
12.5-15
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS3(0-5)
13-13.5
Accutest
MC21667-4
6/7/2013
GEI
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(S3B)
13-15
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS3
13-15
Accutest
MC21667-17
6/10/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301 DS3(5-23)
13.5-15
Accutest
MC21667-5
6/7/2013
GEI
CES-2-3
CES-2-3(14-15)
14-15
Accutest
3/20/2013
GEI
SHORE-4
SHORE-4(S3B)
14-15
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS4
15-17
Accutest
MC21667-6
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS4
15-17
Accutest
MC21667-18
6/10/2013
GEI
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
__
__
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
--
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
--
-
-
-
—
--
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
--
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
--
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
—
-
-
-
<0.30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
<0.30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
<0.30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
<0.30
-
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
<0.30
~
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.60
<0.30
<0.30
<0.60
<0.30
—
-
_
-
-
_
-
-
_
-
-
—
-
-
_
-
-
=
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
-
-
-
-
:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
--
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
--
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
“
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
-
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
_
_
__
:
_
__
—
—
—
—
—
:
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
_
—
-
-
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
—
—
—
—
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVSoil Data HighlighUSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Everett Staging Yard
^Everett, Massachusetts
mmr~
BOR 103 12'
12
Con-test
06B01606
1/13/2006
TTR
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1262
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
Total Pesticides
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Other
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, reactive
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthaiene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Method
8082
8081
8151
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
BOR-101
BOR101 10’
10
Con-test
06B01607
1/13/2006
TTR
^njt^
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
51.9
79.3
CES-2-1
CES-2-1(10-15)
10-15
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
669
SHORE-8
SHORE-8(10-15)
10-15
Accutest
3/14/2013
GEI
TP301
TP301-C
10-15
4/19/2013
GEI
282
124
13.6
TP302
TP302-C
10-15
4/19/2013
GEI
1010
1150
MW301D
MW301DS2
11-13
Accutest
MC21667-3
6/7/2013
GEI
800
335
178
38.4
15.7
56.7
202
0.49
0.14
11.1
598
0.619
13.4
<8.89
4.05
<4.45
19.2
67.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
MW302D
MW302DS2
11-13
Accutest
MC21667-16
6/10/2013
GEI
File No. 171521.10
Page 10 of 16
4/15/2015
CES-2-2
CES-2-2(12-14)
12-14
Accutest
3/15/2013
GEI
1250
CES-2-3
CES-2-3(12-14)
12-14
Accutest
3/20/2013
GEI
9470
SHORE-9
MW301D
SHORE-8
MW302D
MW301D
CES-2-3
SHORE-4
MW301D
MW302D
SHORE-9(12.5-15)
MW301DS3(0-5)
SHORE-8(S3B)
MW302DS3
MW301 DS3(5-23)
CES-2-3(14-15)
SHORE-4(S3B)
MW301DS4
MW302DS4
12.5-15
13-13.5
13-15
13-15
13.5-15
14-15
14-15
15-17
15-17
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
MC21667-4
MC21667-17
MC21667-5
MC21667-6
MC21667-18
3/14/2013
6/7/2013
3/14/2013
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
3/20/2013
3/14/2013
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
--
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
~
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
--
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
~
—
—
_
4.5
312
659
33.6
96.5
726
25.9
74.6
4.2
—
“
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
“
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
"
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
204
38
39.2
56.3
-
21.4
3.6
3.1
-
-
-
— j
—
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
_
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
"
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
“
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
_
~
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
“
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
~
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
__
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
_
==========J
-
-
-
Notes:
1. In general, analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2. "<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
A. The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00,DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data HighlighUSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 11 of 16
4/15/2015
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyltoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-C 8 Aliphatics
C 9 -C 12 Aliphatics
Cg-C -,0 Aromatics
Method
8260
MAVPH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC 8270
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
I Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPI MAEPH
Cg-Cis Aliphatics
C ig -C 36 Aliphatics
mg/kg
mg/kg
C-n-C 22 Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1
mg/kg
Everett, Massachusetts
MW301D
MW301DS5
MW302D
MW301D
MW301D
MW302D
MW302D
MW301D
MW302D
MW301D
MW302D
MW301D
MW301D
MW302DS5
MW301DS6
MW301DS7
MW302DS7
MW302DS8
MW301DS9
MW302DS9
MW301DS10
MW302DS10
MW301DS11
MW301DS12
GZ101S01S02
GZ101S03S04
GZ101S05S06
GZ101S07S08
GZ101S09S10
GZ101S11S12
GZ102S01S02
i /- iy
17-19
19-21
21-23
21-23
23-25
25-27
25-27
27-29
27-29
29-31
31-33
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
0-2
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
Accutest
MC21667-7
MC21667-19
MC21667-8
MC21667-9
MC21667-20
MC21667-21
MC21667-10
MC21667-22
MC21667-11
MC21667-23
MC21667-12
MC21667-13
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
6/7/2013
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
GEI
—
_
_
,
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
“
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
~
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
_
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
~
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
—
“
—
_
— J
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
“
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
“
—
—
—
—
—
~
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
”
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
“
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
--
-
—
—
—
—
~
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
~
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
"
~
""
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
~
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
“
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
"
_
_
—
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
-
-
—
“
—
_
—
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
...
_
—
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
-
-
~
—
—
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
—
—
i
“
_
—
-
-
—
_
—
-
-
-
“
—
—
_
.
—
-
-
-
—
“
_
—
-
-
-
—
***■
“
_
—
-
—
—
—
—
“
__
—
—
-
““
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
~
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
--
-
~
—
—
__
—
-
-
-
—
—
"
_
—
—
-
—
—
—
~
-
-
-
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
table 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Arocior 1248
Aroclor 1254
Arocior 1260
Aroclor 1262
Arocior 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
Total Pesticides
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Other
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, reactive
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Method
8082
8081
8151
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mgykg
File No. 171521.10
Page 12 of 16
4/15/2015
MW301D
MW301DS5
17-19
Accutest
MC21667-7
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS5
17-19
Accutest
MC21667-19
6/10/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS6
19-21
Accutest
MC21667-8
6/7/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS7
21-23
Accutest
MC21667-9
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS7
21-23
Accutest
MC21667-20
6/10/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS8
23-25
Accutest
MC21667-21
6/10/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS9
25-27
Accutest
MC21667-10
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS9
25-27
Accutest
MC21667-22
6/10/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS10
27-29
Accutest
MC21667-11
6/7/2013
GEI
MW302D
MW302DS10
27-29
Accutest
MC21667-23
6/10/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS11
29-31
Accutest
MC21667-12
6/7/2013
GEI
MW301D
MW301DS12
31-33
Accutest
MC21667-13
6/7/2013
GEI
GZ101S01S02
0-2
GZ101S03S04
2-4
GZ101S05S06
4-6
GZ101S07S08
6-8
GZ101S09S10
8-10
GZ101S11S12
10-12
GZ102S01S02
0-2
-
-
:
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
“
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
~
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
~
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
__
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
__
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
68.7
3.7
8.3
4.4
4.7
7.1
3.4
6.8
6.5
6.0
4.2
3.5
151
10.8
4750
133
6.08
9.12
697
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
-
--
--
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10.9
2.6
4.6
2.8
6.2
8.9
3.1
7.3
4.9
6.0
3.4
2.8
1170
153
4640
112
7.74
13.7
631
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
“
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
"
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
“
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
“
“
—
—
—
-
-
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
~
—
--—.
~
■■
—
-
1 in general, analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2 . "<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 . «_• = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area _ .
A. The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationlSoil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 13 of 16
4/15/2015
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Anjyyte
MAVPH
8270
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
Benzene
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Isopropyttoluene, p-
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Styrene
Toluene
T richloroethylene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Xylene, Total
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
Cs-Cs Aliphatics
C 9 -C 12 Aliphatics
Cg-C -,0 Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPK| MAEPH
Cg-C 18 Aliphatics
Cig-Cgg Aliphatics
CH-C 22 Aromatics
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Fuels, diesel, no 2
Fuel oil no 6
Gasoline
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons_
Method
8260
_Units_
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Everett, Massachusetts
GZ102S03S04
GZ-307 6ft-10ft
GZ-307 10ft-15ft
GZ-308 6ft-10ft
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
GZ-309 10ft-15ft
GZ-310 6ft-10ft
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
GZ-301 6ft-10ft
GZ102S05S06
GZ102S07S08
GZ102S09S10
GZ103S01S02
GZ103S03S04
GZ103S05S06
GZ103S06S07
GZ103S08S09
GZ103S10S11
GZ-307 6ft-10ft
GZ-307 10ft-15ft
GZ-308 6ft-10ft
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
GZ-309 10ft-15ft
GZ-310 6ft-10ft
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
GZ-301 6ft-10ft
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-11
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
1502404-01
1502404-02
1502404-03
1502404-04
1502404-05
1502404-06
1502404-07
1502404-08
1502331-01
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/23/2015
—
_
_
<0.0034
0.0305
0.0045
0.0287
0.0201
0.101
0.0044
0.143
<0.0029
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
—
—
--
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
<0.0034
<0.0045
<0.0029
<0.0041
<0.0032
0.0126
<0.0043
0.0223
<0.0029
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
0.0025
<0.0016
0.0103
<0.0021
0.0114
<0.0015
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
__
—
_
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
~
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0034
<0.0045
<0.0029
<0.0041
<0.0032
<0.0080
<0.0043
<0.0094
<0.0029
-
-
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
0.0358
<0.0021
0.006
0.0163
0.0023
0.0048
<0.0015
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.0017
<0.0022
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0016
<0.0040
<0.0021
<0.0047
<0.0015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~~
-
=
<0.0034
<0.0045
<0.0029
<0.0041
<0.0032
<0.0080
<0.0043
<0.0094
<0.0029
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 1
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
I
I
_
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
4.38
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
10.7
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
1.57
23.2
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
12.4
41.8
1.35
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
—
—
<0.522
<0.550
<0.481
7.76
21.9
1.03
<0.508
0.712
<0.473
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
6.06
19.7
1.22
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
__
_
_
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
2.6
3.28
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
7.93
27
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
__
_
_
_
__
—
_
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
<1.03
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
__
_
_
<0.522
<0.550
<0.481
9.97
32.4
1.4
<0.508
0.798
<0.473
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.522
<0.550
<0.481
1.84
3.03
<0.591
<0.508
<0.647
<0.473
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
8.89
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.10
1.09
14
91.3
3.24
<1.01
1.58
<0.944
_
_
_
_
__
_
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
13.7
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
3.28
4.42
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
<1.12
7.49
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
__
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
1.8
7.72
<1.18
2.65
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
_
—
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
1.69
107
3.35
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
—
—
—
-
<1.04
<1.10
<0.958
11.3
61.4
2.19
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
~
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
~
“
—
““
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
"
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
~~
_
_
—
—
-
“
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
“
~~
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
~~
~~
~~
_
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
““
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
~
“
“
_
_
—
-
-
-
—
—
—
”
_
_
—
•-
-
-
—
—
—
“
_
_
—
-
-
—
—
—
~
“
~
~
~
_
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
~
_
~
_
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
“
~
-
_
—
-
-
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
-
“
"
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
“
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
—
I
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
_
\
—
-
-
-
-
—
“
“
—
_
—
—
-
—
“
“
—
—
—
—
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
“
—
_
_
_
—
—
—
—
—
”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
<48.5
71.1
164
464
1410
407
94.3
164
<43.7
J. \ 170 , 000 - 179 ,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVSoil Data Highlight\Soil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 14 of 16
4/15/2015
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1262
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
Total Pesticides
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Other
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, reactive
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
I Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Method
8082
8081
8151
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
"^general. analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2 "<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5 . ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6 . mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett, Massachusetts
GZ102S03S04
GZ-307 6ft-10ft
GZ-307 10ft-15ft
GZ-308 6ft-10ft
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
GZ-309 6ft-10ft
GZ-309 10ft-15ft
GZ-310 6ft-10ft
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
GZ-301 6ft-10ft
GZ102S05S06
GZ102S07S08
GZ102S09S10
GZ103S01S02
GZ103S03S04
GZ103S05S06
GZ103S06S07
GZ103S08S09
GZ103S10S11
GZ-307 6ft-10ft
GZ-307 10ft-15ft
GZ-308 6ft-10ft
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
GZ-309 6ft-10ft
GZ-309 10ft-15ft
GZ-310 6ft-10ft
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
GZ-301 6ft-10ft
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-11
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
10-15
6-10
1502404-01
1502404-02
1502404-03
1502404-04
1502404-05
1502404-06
1502404-07
1502404-08
1502331-01
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/27/2015
02/23/2015
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
—
-
—
—
_
—
—
_
__
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
—
—
_
_
—
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
-
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.153
0.354
<0.141
0.347
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
. <0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
-
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
<0.153
<0.168
<0.141
<0.176
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<0.153
1.026
<0.141
1.051
<0.158
<0.179
<0.155
<0.205
<0.132
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13500
10400
6470
39.5
17.5
280
74.1
317
2420
11.4
65.9
72.1
138
326
2720
4910
14800
408
19.6
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
41.3
71.8
220
505
195
194
165
50.9
46.4
<1.53
28.6
<3.90
9.7
<36.2
<47.6
<415
<15.6
<1.93
—
—
_
_
_
__
—
_
—
—
11.8
29.4
11
12.6
10.9
35.5
13.5
37.1
9.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
_
_
_
_
_
_
—
_
_
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
21900
14900
5110
62.1
197
2590
620
777
70.4
13.8
347
6270
158
1020
2980
11200
13300
445
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.695
0.327
1.68
1.67
11.1
166
205
8.24
0.23
<7.65
<7.33
<7.80
9.71
13
279
166
<10.4
<9.63
-
-
-
:
-
-
-
-
<1.53
10.4
<1.56
21.4
7.32
8.55
12.3
<2.09
<1.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
<1.12
4.38
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
. .
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
<1.12
10.7
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
1.57
23.2
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
12.4
41.8
1.35
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
<0.522
<0.55
<0.481
7.76
21.9
1.03
<0.508
0.712
<0.473
_
—
—
—
-
--
-
-
-
-
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
6.06
19.7
1.22
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
-
-
—
—
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
2.6
3.28
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
7.93
27
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
_
__
_
<0.522
<0.55
<0.481
9.97
32.4
1.4
<0.508
0.798
<0.473
_
_
_
<0.522
<0.55
<0.481
1.84
3.03
<0.591
<0.508
<0.647
<0.473
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.1
1.09
14
91.3
3.24
<1.01
1.58
<0.944
_
_
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
<1.12
13.7
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
...
_
—
—
-
-
-
-
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
3.28
4.42
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
<1.12
7.49
<1.18
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
—
—
_
_
_
<0.0017
<0.0022
0.0358
1.8
7.72
0.0163
2.65
0.0048
<0.0015
—
—
-
_
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
1.69
107
3.35
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
- ~
_
_
—
-
-
-
-
<1.04
<1.1
<0.958
11.3
61.4
2.19
<1.01
<1.29
<0.944
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVSoil Data HighlighUSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Sample Location
GZ-301 10ft-15ft
GZ-302 6ft- 10ft
Sample ID
GZ-301 10ft-15ft
GZ-302 6ft-10ft
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
10-15
6-10
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
1502331-02
1502331-03
Sample Date
02/23/2015
02/23/2015
Consultant
Analyte
Method
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
8260
mg/kg
0.0168
0 476
Benzene
<0.0018
<0 0018
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
<0.0036
<0 0036
Carbon disulfide
<0.0018
<0 0018
Chloroform
<0.0018
<0 0018
Ethylbenzene
<0.0018
<0 0018
Isopropyltoluene, p-
<0.0018
<0 0018
Methylene Chloride
<0.0036
<0.0036
Naphthalene
<0.0018
<0.0018
Styrene
<0.0018
<0.0018
Toluene
<0.0018
<0.0018
Trichloroethylene
<0.0018
<0.0018
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
<0.0018
<0.0018
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
<0.0018
<0.0018
Xylene, Total
<0.0036
<0.0036
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH)
MAVPH
mg/kg
C 5 -C 8 Aliphatics
_
Cg-C 12 Aliphatics
CgrC-jo Aromatics
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC
8270
mg/kg
-
-
Acenaphthene
<4.21
<1.05
Acenaphthylene
<4.21
<1.05
Anthracene
<4.21
<1.05
Benzo(a)anthracene
<4.21
<1.05
Benzo(a)pyrene
<2.11
<0.526
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
<4.21
<1.05
Benzo(e)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(ghi)perylene
<4.21
<1.05
Benzo(k)fiuoranthene
<421
<1.05
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
<4.21
<1.05
Chrysene
<2.11
<0.526
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<2.11
<0.526
Dibenzofuran
<4.21
<1.05
Fluoranthene
<4.21
<1.05
Fluorene
<4.21
<1.05
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<4.21
<1.05
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
-
-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
<4.21
<1.05
Naphthalene
<4.21
<1.05
Phenanthrene
<4.21
<1.05
Pyrene
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPI
MAEPH
mg/kg
<4.21
<1.05
Cg-Ci e Aliphatics
-
-
C 19 -C 36 Aliphatics
-
-
C 11 -C 2 2 Aromatics
-
-
Acenaphthene
-
-
Acenaphthylene
—
—
Anthracene
-
-
Benzo(a)anthracene
-
-
Benzo(a)pyrene
—
—
Benzo(b)fiuoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
—
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
—
—
Fluoranthene
—
Fluorene
-
“
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
—
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
—
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
—
Naphthalene
—
—
Phenanthrene
—
—
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
mg/kg
Fuels, diesel, no 2
—
—
Fuel oil no 6
—
Gasoline
—
Kerosene/Jet Fuel
—
Unknown Hydrocarbons
—
—
Totai Petroleum Hydrocarbons
<50.7
<44.3
table 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
File No. 171521.10
Page 15 of 16
4/15/2015
GZ-302 10ft-15ft
GZ-302 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-04
02/23/2015
0.023
< 0.0020
<0.0041
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
<0.0041
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
<0.0041
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<0.526
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<0.526
<0.526
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<1.05
<49.3
GZ-303 6ft-10ft
GZ-303 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-05
02/23/2015
0.0403
<0.0025
<0.0050
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0050
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0025
<0.0050
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.491
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.491
<0.491
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
<0.978
GZ-303 10ft- 15ft
10-15
1502331-06
02/23/2015
0.0894
<0.0059
0.0126
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0117
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0059
<0.0117
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<0.626
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<0.626
<0.626
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
<1.25
181
133
GZ-304 6ft- 10ft
6-10
1502331-07
02/23/2015
0.0866
<0.0053
0.0108
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0106
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0053
<0.0106
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.480
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.480
<0.480
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
<0.957
2410
GZ-304 10ft- 15ft
GZ-304 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-08
02/23/2015
GZ-305 6ft-10ft
GZ-305 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-09
02/23/2015
GZ-305 10ft-15ft
GZ-305 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-10
02/23/2015
GZ-306 6ft-10ft
GZ-306 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-11
02/23/2015
GZ-306 10ft-15ft
GZ-306 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-12
02/23/2015
D02S01S02A
0.0-3.3
D02S02BS04A
3.3-66
D02S04BS05
6.6-10.0
D03S01S02A
0.0-3.3
D03S02BS03
3.3-6.0
D03S05
8.0-10.0
E02S01S02A
0.0-3.3
E02S02BS03
3.3-6.0
0.139
0.0701
0.0725
0.114
0.035
0.0358
<0.0126
0.0382
<0.0092
<0.0080
<0.0076
0.0271
0.0415
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
0.0147
<0.0124
0.01
0.0104
<0.0092
<0.0104
<0.0126
<0.0088
<0.0092
<0.0080
<0.0076
<0.0114
<0.0085
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0101
<0.0124
<0.0085
<0.0079
<0.0092
<0.0104
<0.0126
<0.0088
<0.0092
<0.0080
<0.0076
<0.0114
<0.0085
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
0.0261
0.0235
0.0065
<0.0044
<0.0046
0.0089
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
0.0053
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0050
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
<0.0046
<0.0052
<0.0063
<0.0044
<0.0046
<0.0040
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
<0.0101
<0.0124
<0.0085
<0.0079
<0.0092
<0.0104
<0.0126
<0.0088
<0.0092
<0.0080
<0.0076
<0.0114
<0.0085
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
1.02
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
3.02
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
1.34
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
<0.870
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
4.19
1.78
<1.01
1.69
6.44
<0.975
<3.63
6.09
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
18.9
4.93
<1.01
3.85
13.2
<0.975
<3.63
13.5
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.500
<0.580
15.3
5.16
<0.505
3.15
10.1
<0.489
2.65
11.7
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
21.6
7
<1.01
3.04
11.6
<0.975
<3.63
15
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
2.3
1.42
<1.01
0.933
4.33
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
7.61
2
<1.01
3.28
4.8
<0.975
<3.63
8.05
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<0.910
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
1.8
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.500
<0.580
15.4
4.77
<0.505
3.33
12
<0.489
3.35
13.5
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.500
<0.580
<0.456
<0.497
<0.505
0.531
<0.436
<0.489
<1.82
<1.81
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
1.07
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
1.7
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
27.8
9.1
<1.01
8.65
29.9
<0.975
6.35
29.2
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
1.4
<0.991
<1.01
0.94
2.88
<0.975
<3.63
4.17
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
2.72
1.49
<1.01
0.972
4.44
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<0.910
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
<0.870
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
1.64
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
1.1
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
12.6
6.94
<1.01
6.01
21.2
<0.975
4.69
20.9
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
20
7.68
<1.01
4.78
20.4
<0.975
4.97
21.6
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
”
—
—
—
n
mm
;;
—
-
-
-
—
--
-
-
-
-
—
—
—
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
«
—
-
-
—
--
-
-
-
-
—
—
..
—
—
—
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
..
_
..
117
<48.2
<64.9
<47.2
76.4
761
210
71.4
310
885
<46.5
933
966
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Soil Data HighlighttSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
‘
Analyte
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth (ft bgs)
Laboratory
Laboratory ID
Sample Date
Consultant
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1262
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1268
Total PCBs
Pesticides
Total Pesticides
Herbicides
Total Herbicides
Metals, Total
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
lOther
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, reactive
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Methylnaphthalene, 1-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Method
8082
8081
8151
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
7471
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
6010
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
TABLE 1-1
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 16 of 16
4/15/2015
lun-iort
GZ-301 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-02
02/23/2015
GZ-302 6ft-10ft
GZ-302 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-03
02/23/2015
GZ-302 10ft- 15ft
GZ-302 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-04
02/23/2015
GZ-303 6ft-10ft
GZ-303 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-05
02/23/2015
GZ-303 10ft-15ft
GZ-303 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-06
02/23/2015
GZ-304 6ft-10ft
GZ-304 6ft- 10ft
6-10
1502331-07
02/23/2015
GZ-304 10ft- 15ft
GZ-304 10ft-15ft
10-15
1502331-08
02/23/2015
GZ-305 6ft-10ft
GZ-305 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-09
02/23/2015
GZ-305 10ft-15ft
GZ-305 10ft- 15ft
10-15
1502331-10
02/23/2015
GZ-306 6ft-10ft
GZ-306 6ft-10ft
6-10
1502331-11
02/23/2015
GZ-306 10ft-
GZ-306 10ft
10-15
1502331-1
02/23/201
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.148
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
<0.146
<0.158
<0.146
<0.148
<0.185
<0.143
<0.205
<0.157
<0.203
<0.149
<0.187
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
166
907
707
169
2820
746
269
439
1000
3930
1990
18.7
111
59.6
56.7
740
13.1
25.9
33.3
20.1
42.3
448
<2.14
<13.9
<8.77
<4.78
<13.0
<18.0
<7.65
<5.63
<10.1
130
<11.0
16.9
7.61
18
41.3
25.7
31.2
24.1
19.3
19.4
12.7
25.1
104
121
155
926
3070
41.6
43.1
415
120
100
1600
0.21
0.779
0.382
2.53
1.69
3.41
0.126
16.4
0.279
0.298
1.11
<10.7
<11.1
<8.77
<9.57
<13.0
<12.0
<15.3
<11.3
<13.5
<11.5
<14.7
<2.14
<2.23
<1.75
<1.91
12.3
<2.39
<3.06
<2.25
<2.69
<2.30
3.15
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<2.11
<0.526
<0.526
<0.491
<0.626
<0.48
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.5
<0.58
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<2.11
<0.526
<0.526
<0.491
<0.626
<0.48
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.5
<0.58
<2.11
<0.526
<0.526
<0.491
<0.626
<0.48
<0.675
<0.506
<0.668
<0.5
<0.58
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<0.0018
<0.0018
<0.002
<0.0025
<0.0059
<0.0053
<0.005
<0.0062
<0.0042
<0.0039
0.0261
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
<4.21
<1.05
<1.05
<0.978
<1.25
<0.957
<1.35
<1.01
<1.33
<0.997
<1.16
J2S01S02A
D02S02BS04A
D02S04BS05
D03S01S02A
D03S02BS03
D03S05
E02S01S02A
E02S02BS03
0.0-3.3
3.3-6.6
6.6-10.0
0.0-3.3
3.3-6.0
8.0-10.0
0.0-3.3
3.3-6.0
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
1.94
16.5
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
0.152
0.975
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
0.249
<0.146
<0.138
8.54
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
59.2
1.76
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
<7.32
<0.146
<0.134
<0.130
<0.146
<0.138
<0.146
<0.132
88.48
2.344
0.688
1.679
<0.146
2.492
25.551
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<5.73
95.1
29.7
15
32.7
12.4
32.1
67.3
33.3
165
10.2
45.6
148
74.2
89.1
143
<1.15
<1.48
<1.32
<1.42
7.66
<1.54
<1.35
<1.49
17.5
78.1
7.04
40.8
25.4
46.9
19.9
21.4
<11.5
1860
84.4
170
651
41.9
341
606
0.299
30.9
0.494
1.15
4.39
14
2.49
4.72
<5.73
14
<6.60
<7.09
<6.70
<7.70
<6.75
<7.47
<1.15
1.9
<1.32
<1.42
<1.34
<1.54
<1.35
<1.49
<2.0
<2.0
-
<2.0
<2.0
-
<2.0
<2.0
1.02
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
3.02
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
1.34
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
<0.87
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
4.19
1.78
<1.01
1.69
6.44
<0.975
<3.63
6.09
18.9
4.93
<1.01
3.85
13.2
<0.975
<3.63
13.5
15.3
5.16
<0.505
3.15
10.1
<0.489
2.65
11.7
21.6
7
<1.01
3.04
11.6
<0.975
<3.63
15
2.3
1.42
<1.01
0.933
4.33
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
7.61
2
<1.01
3.28
4.8
<0.975
<3.63
8.05
15.4
4.77
<0.505
3.33
12
<0.489
3.35
13.5
<0.456
<0.497
<0.505
0.531
<0.436
<0.489
<1.82
<1.81
27.8
9.1
<1.01
8.65
29.9
<0.975
6.35
29.2
1.4
<0.991
<1.01
0.94
2.88
<0.975
<3.63
4.17
2.72
1.49
<1.01
0.972
4.44
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
<0.91
<0.991
<1.01
<0.906
<0.87
<0.975
<3.63
<3.62
1.64
0.0065
<0.0044
<0.0046
1.1
<0.0038
<0.0057
<0.0043
12.6
6.94
<1.01
6.01
21.2
<0.975
4.69
20.9
20
7.68
<1.01
4.78
20.4
<0.975
4.97
21.6
Notes:
1 In general, analytes detected in at least one sample are reported here. For the 2015 data, only selected VOCs and SVOCs are listed. Other not detected. For a complete list of analytes see the laboratory data sheets.
2. "<" = The analyte was not detected at a concentration above the specified laboratory reporting limit.
3. ND = The analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit;
4 = The sample was not tested for this analyte.
5. ft bgs = feet below ground surface
6. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
7. Highlights indicate the proposed remediation areas from which the samples were collected.
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
A The analyte was analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected
concentration is listed to represent the sample result. If the analyte was not detected via either method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the nondetected sample result.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationtSoil Data HighlighttSoil Data
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
CD
<D
>x
if)
CD
</>
0)
O)
CD
</>
c
0)
TJ
3
TJ
CD
TJ
0)
s
3
O
CD
£
C
CD
O
3
CO
a>
o.
3
O
CD
O)
CD
O
<D
CD
>
TO
CD
k.
CO
<0
(/>
o
E
a>
>
CD
-C
2
3
O
£
</>
CD
<D
>»
lO
CO
</)
CD
O)
CD
c
CD
;u
'</>
a>
3
TJ
CD
ZJ
</)
8
CD
N
CD
8
c
s
I
c
o
c
CD
£
c
o
TJ
0 ) < 1 >
^ </>
O CD
2 CD
X
CD
TJ
C
CD
N
CD
X
c
IS
0-
>
o
c
a>
o>
c
c
o
O
CO
a)
<o
c
o
5
>
8
TJ
TJ
<
<
o
J:\170.000-179.999\171521V171521-00 DELV2015 PM10 DerivationVDust MonitoringWea 5M71521 10 Risk Summary A-5\SUM_RISK
TABLE I-3A File No. 171521.10
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR SOIL SAMPLES Pa 9 e 1 of 1
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area 4/15/2015
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
lO
25
0
0
Q
_J
O
<
o
v <D
4- o. 2 « :
E ^ cr e
o c o
cl Q £ ~
£ ro S -
« I X ^
o ® c o
CL 9 ro ro
X L r l
^is
co
o
o
a
E
o
E
x
CL 0)
Q) CD
Q ^
o 00
s |
O ^
o
CN
m
O O O O ^
oooo?
ZZZZ
_ CO __ __
jro><OcMoo<r>oOoo
o{05'»-t-CDr--CDCD5 ,, ^ tDCO CO CN 0
0 -CNr^cor^T-coco C 3''-'«-'<- 0 a>''-
< < < <
< < < < <
zzzzz
o o .
CN ID
O § CO in CD
CO ~ o o o
m m
d o
CM g TT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
CO
0
CO
CO
CO
0
0
co
co
0
0
0
co
0
0
<9
d
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
°? 9
9
9
9
CO
9
CO
CO
CO
9
9
cd
co
9
9
9
co
9
9
CO
CD
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CN
CO
CO
CO
co 9
CO
CO
CO
d
CO
d
d
d
CO
CO
d
d
CO
CO
CO
d
CO
co
CO
CD
CO
CO
CO
CO
co
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
d
CO
d
d
d
cd
cd
d
d
cd
cd
cd
d
cd
cd
s
o
co
m
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
<
<
<
CO
<
<
<
<
CO
<
CO
<
<
<
CO
CO
<
<
CO
CO
CO
<
CO
CO
0
0
0 0
0
O
O
0
3
cn
CO
0
O"
0
O'
O
0
0
CN
0
CN
CN
CN
0
0
CN
CN
0
0
O
CN
0
0
c n
cn
cn cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
CD
CN
cn
CD
CN
cn
CD
CN
cn
cn
CD
CN
cn
CD
CN
cn
CD
CN
cn
CD
CN
cn
O
cn
O
O
O
cn
cn
O
O
cn
cn
cn
O
cn
cn
CD
CD
CD CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
0)
CD
cn
CD
cn
cn
cn
CD
CD
cn
cn
CD
CD
CD
cn
CD
CD
CN
■' 3 -
CN CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
cn
CN
0
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
O
0
0 0
0
O
0
O
O
CN
0
0
O
0
0
0
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
0
O
O
c 0
cn
cn cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
O
cn
0
cn
O
cn
cn
O
cn
CD
O
cn
O
cn
0
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
CN
CN
CO CO
CN
CN
CO
CN
CO
CO
CN
CO
CN
CN
CN
CO
CN
<>j
CO
CO
CN
CO
CN
CO
CN
O
0
0 0
O
O
0
O
CN
CN
N
0
CN
0
CN
CN
CN
CN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
LU
a
a a
LU
LU
0
LU
O
O
O
O
8
O
O
O
O
a
8
O
O
a
a
O
0
Q
a
O
LU
O
O
O
LU
O
0
O
LU
0 C 03
P 0 ! h
E 0 c
I 5 8
< §
o
03
C
5
T3 c
CD 0
O
O
■O
0
o
0
0
Q
0
cn
c
0
a:
13 ®
0
C
<
o
CN
co S
CN H
cd h- m
^ S '“
00 Tt-
TTO)CDcNOOCOCOco
CD h- CD CO
CN N CD N
5 <
m <o o
CN o
t S
58
O
m
a>
i N-
o o
co co CO r-
cd r^- r^- o
S ° ° ° 9 (N
o o o o
o- cn i
h- oo
■ s s ^ 10 s
i CN t- CO CO n
CD
;00Tj-CNOCDCDT-jQa>CNh-gmc0
^tJ-cmT-CN^QCO^r-OOCD
d
CN
O'
o
d
o 0 ‘O ro
o
o m
m cd
co t-
o
o
co
o
co
co
m
o
o
o
r"-
N-
O O)
h-
CN
O
o
^ n- ^
o) m m
. CN
m 03
CD
O O T_ O
CO O
0 : T_
^ (3) m CN co ^ lO
cb ^ ^ CN Tj 00 T—
o> o
T- CO CN CO
O CN ^ CD •«- CN
CO ^ CN CN
m
N' N CD k m
0 ) 0 ) 0 ..
00 00
o
00 00
CN
00
00 GO 00 00 00
CN CN CN CN CD
in co 1 - 00 in oo
o o
OOOOOOCOGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCO
cNT-inincDm^j-incoT-cDN-^cococo
</>
O
§
cn
*8
s
3
o
1
o
o
i
c O
t*
£ %
%n
in
< h- <n
0
0
0
-C
sz
Q.
f
® c
£ 0
£ 3
0
-O
Q
CN
CD
8
o
£ t
O JO
-e *
3 S
p -c
■O 9
> on
|I
II
-I
0 >
o o
I- *X.
CO O O CN
^ m 0 ^ w
CN CN CN CN CD
IIIIP
OOO
OOO
OOO
< < <
5 U-
< \—
gi
Ie
C T3
fi
— — — ^ ^ >
TO TO SZ g, TO TO =
mo Oj 5 w m
5 « <6
<
I
o
i
I
0
Q
5=
I
s
5
*o
I
I £
0
4
0
0
0
^ 0
£ c
8 8
0 CO
< < <
0 C
C 0
2 O
Ql 5T
0 ±=
& 0
±= c c c c c
0 0 0 0
CD CD CD CD
JO
0 - 2 -
E 0
0 N
(/> c
0
£ £
O Q I
i s 0
c c
0 0
V <D
CO CD O
«:jf
TL 0
v CL 0 2
32 0 -C >■
£ Z 0. 0.
>*
C
c .o r
t g
0 - =
LU TO
o .y
0
$
'C
p
Q.
d
■0
0
t
O
(/>
0
0
2
0
CL
0
XI
c
0
c
0
3
V—
CO
CO
C
O
D
_£I
0
€
c
0
s
5> (I) in
o 2 Q
0 0 0 .
CD > LU
9
0
0 .
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/15/2015
TABLE I-4A
SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
EPC1
EPC3
COC
Arithmetic
Mean
Concentration
in Soil - Area 5 a
(mg/kg)
Estimated
Concentration
in Fugitive
Dust b
(mg/m 3 )
Acetone
0.020
3.02E-09
Trichloroethene
0.0028
4.17E-10
Acenaphthene
1.2
1.80E-07
Acenaphthylene
0.92
1.38E-07
Anthracene
2.9
4.31 E-07
Benzo(a)Anthracene
7.1
1.07E-06
Benzo(a)Pyrene
6.1
9.10E-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
7.6
1.14E-06
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
1.7
2.55E-07
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3.6
5.35E-07
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.98
1.47E-07
Chrysene
6.6
9.91 E-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.44
6.63E-08
Dibenzofuran
1.0
1.56E-07
Fluoranthene
14
2.10E-06
Fluorene
1.6
2.38E-07
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
1.8
2.67E-07
Naphthalene
0.34
5.17E-08
Phenanthrene
9.2
1.37E-06
Pyrene
10
1.51E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
520
7.80E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
15
2.28E-06
Arsenic
951
1.43E-04
Barium
89
1.33E-05
Cadmium
1.6
2.35E-07
Chromium (total)
32
4.82E-06
Lead
2488
3.73E-04
Mercury
7.3
1.10E-06
Selenium
4.8
7.13E-07
Silver
0.84
1.26E-07
Notes:
a. The soil exposure point concentration is based on the arithmetic mean concentration from all soil samples obtained from the A-5 Area
Proposed Remediation Area.
b. The soil-borne fugitive dust exposure point concentrations were estimated from the soil exposure point concentration according to the
following equation:
EPC dust = EPC soil * PM 10 * Cl
Calculated
Calculated
0.15
IE-06
Abbreviations:
COC = constituent of concern.
EPC dust Exposure Point Concentration in Fugitive Dust (mg/m 3 )
EPCsoii Exposure Point Concentration in Soil (mg/kg)
PM 10 Respirable Particle Concentration - Commercial/Industrial Workers & Residents (kg/mg)
Cl Unit Conversion Factor
J:\170.000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MonitoringVArea 5\171521.10 Exp ConVEPC
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
■ o o
^ - 0!
LU
LL
O
oc
o.
LU
oc
D
CO
O
0.
X
LU
ac
LU
*
q:
o
.2 co
m "O 5-
.5 u d)
d S° CO
<
is
— Jfc ct
iu *'
£ >- 3
E o) -g
2 .E to
O) <«
t;2S
s» ^
8. a>
o
a>
>
LU
a
o
<
o
o
CO
Q
a>
CT)
TO
a>
>
<
<u
E
•D
C
co
Q
D
<
_ ®
^ iS
0
<
if) in
3<
Z
<
o
a:
lu
o
o
co
0
_3
CD
>
O
o
0
Q.
CO
I
o
Q.
0
O
0
a:
o
Q
0 >
co
Q
0
O)
CD
l_
0
>
<
0
TO
0
O
O
■O
0
CO
3
co
c
o
CD
3
cr
LU
c
o
TO
3
cr
LU
c
o
cr
LU
o
TO
TO
C
(0
0
c
o
o
♦
16
LU
2 of
<0
TO
O
TO
>
CO
3
o
o
3
CO
o
CL
X
LU
>*
TO
*
-C
- -
TO
Q.
3
CO
o
a.
x
LU
CD
£
LU
tt
o
Q
<
O
Q
3
TO
0
0
O)
o
o
TO
c
o
in
CD
CD
o
0
o'
<
CO
o
in
CD
co
CM
Q_
o
CM
*
CO
c
c
T<
~o
0
0.
LU
CL
LU
"O
0
1
c
0.
LU
CL
LU
o
o
0
TO
Q
Q
E
LU
TO
Q
CO
CD
3
cr
LU
TO
3
cr
LU
1-
0
0
CO
3
O
TO
O
below
co
CO
TO
CO
CO
TO
3
CO
CO
<
_l
CD
<
1-
To
c
o
O
CO
co
TO
TO
3
cr
0
0.
<
*
§
CD
0
O
0
0
0
O
C
TO
■g
3
o
co
o
o
CM
CL
LU
O
CO
CO
TO
8
c
TO
"O
T3
O
L_
0
Q.
0
o'
Q.
0
"O
0
TO
O
k_
CL
0
0
CL
CO
>*
TO
TJ
i_
3
O
TO
0
Ca
>N
CO
To
E
>%
TO
■o
X
In
-C
in
g
CD
CO
E
♦
X
CO
O)
h.
TO
0
>»
E
O)
c
o
3
O
o
•o -o
0 0
<
g g
TO TO
O O
CD
O
CM
in
o
g
o
0
Q.
co cD
1 s
3 *-
C
o
O
> 0
& i
TO m
■a ^
0
O)
TO
L—
0
>
TO
_co
TO
3
cr
0
O
co 10
S »q
■*- in
CM
>
>»
TO
TO
TO
O)
>%
0
T3
T3
TO
i
O)
i
o>
X
T3
2
-X
O)
-X
O)
o>
E
O)
E
C
0
E
E
>
0
C
0
>
0
To
>
TO
TD
(O
(0
0
c
3
{!? CO CO
E o> >* >%
'p' ^ TO TO
0
(O
O
a
>> 2
5 ®
O <
O) c
2 -
0 a)
> ?t=
< -J
o
CO
c
0 ) o
co
O W
9. c
f §
a o
0 o
O)
TO C
O
0l
0
0
o
CO
o
CL
X
LU
0
TO
a:
c
o
0
O)
c
o
CO
>%
o
c
0
3
cr
0
3
CO
o
CL
X
LU
c
o
TO
3
Q
£
3
■o
o
0
o.
0
3
CO
& & |
X x 0
LU LU H
CO
o
L_
8
0
I
i
O
3
Q.
C
c
s
o
TO
O
o
0
c
c3
•*—
i_
CL
T3
T3
o
t5
*5
o
•»_
o
TO
,.
0
0
x:
CL
CL
C
g
O)
0
O)
c
o>
c
CO
l_
§
cn
O)
0
TO
TO
>
i_
c
TJ
0
0
o
O
>
>
o
CD
<
<
c
o
Q. —
u
o
CO
-Q
<
0
>
a:
u. a Q-
LU LU LU
o
■> c o
^ 0- 0.
CD < <
£
o
0
-Q
CO
TO
T3
0
>s
TO
O)
E
o
TO
TO
C
To
0
c
o
TO
O)
CO
0
E "
CO
L_
o
T>
TO
4 -
c
o
CO
0
>
c
CO
3
■O
TO
o:
c
o
8 <=
c
3
CD
O
O
O
o
o
n
o
X
O
LU
X
a:
>
X
o
3
o
a
LU
c
o
3
a
o
o
TD
■4^
3
o
m
o>
CD
CL
LU
O
CO
CO
TO
o
6
0
JO
TO
>%
>
c3
TO
s
to r: -
3
O
0.
X
CM
t)
TO
C
TO
To
0
c
o
•*->
CO
TO
O
TO
‘>
To
3
■o
3
CO
o
CL
X
0.
0
TO
C
o
0
O)
c
To
3
TJ
?
>
*c
0
2
8
0
C
o
d
0
X
0
O)
c
E
q:
>
n
TO
0
C
o
To
TO
O
TO
0
TO
DC
c
o
To
0
O)
c
5
co
E
O)
.. h
0
O <
Z
co
0
o
5
3
"O
c
TO
O
0
E
E
o
O
c
g
T5
0
O
a
c
0
E
c
o
>
c
LU
c
0
E
tr
TO
CL
0
O
CO
ts
0
CO
3
o
1
CO
TO
5
II
0.
LU
Q
>
0
k_
JO
JO
<
<
O
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-OO.DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust Monitoring\Area 5M71S21.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)\Parameters
o o
CM CM
£ V £
LU
_J
LL.
O
cl
Q.
LU
tr
D
CO
o
Q_
X
LU
a:
LU
CL
O
03
LU
m
<t O
H Z> Q-
O 2
-o
73
a) >-
E
0 _
Ct O) w
TJ S SS
Si w 5
g>o
TO
<
tr
i—
co
3
O
z
3
<
a
a.
LU
o
o
4) J5
o Jn <i)
u V u
Q_ > 0
~I LU >
03 LU
LU
a
3
CO
&
X
LU
.>%
CO
O
0
03
CO
i_
a>
>
<
03
E
•o
c
03
LL?
Q
<
o
CL
X
LU
CO
Q
a)
O)
co
i_
03
>
<
03
0
3
O
CO
O
o
■o
03
CA
3
CA
c
o
CD
3
cr
LU
<A
3
a
03
>
O)
3
Li.
03
C
c
o
n
o
co
c
o
w
CO
>
<
$
X
►-
<
CL
LU
X
3
CO
o
CL
X
LU
CA
03
.3
CO '
>
o
03 <
Q. '
CO
I
o
Q.
03 -
O
03
CL
LU
LU
LU
Q
<
LU
Q
5
•o
o
’C
03
Q.
T5
0
o'
L_
CL
03
<
03
O
z
CL
CL
O)
c
CA
3
CA
C
o
"O
03
To
v_
o
CL
03
i
i_
03
CL
CA
CO
03
>»
Ta
>N
CO
■O
ID
co
CO
CO
0)
c
8
c
o
o
o
(A
E
o
in (O ^
T3
0
03
73
o
E
c
o
>*
CO
^ 1
I e
5 TO a
o S £
CN | 0.
CL > 73
LU > 03
n g^Lil>ScclU co
SS-^OroEiSiSjAjA
to to .$2 £ •— 3«o>nj nj
O-q-OTO^ojOOo-ct
LU UJ .
CL <fl _
>. </> o
h- < O
L_
o
0
0
>
0
Ta
E
>*
0
0
"O
V^-
IT)
CD
CO
0
03
0
c
CL
LU
0
>
0
0
CA
CA
CO
0
0
c
3
3
o
cr
cr
O
0
0
•a ^
® 1 h- 0 o
— LU S m 10 5 ° S In
3 , O CO ■ ^ o CO
O d f'l ° P * r IA
TO 9 O CNJ
o 5
ID
CD
V—
0
C
CA
c
o
c
o
CA
(O
£
cn
E
to
E
0
>*
Ta
0
>
0
CA
i_
0
3
O
0
To
O
o>
03
o>
♦s
2
0
CA
3
cr
LU
3
CT
LU
D
£
3.
E
C_
0
>
0
3
o
sz
>s
>.
0
73
O)
E
CA
3
a
03
_>
03
3
LL
2 .E
3 g
o .2
x 2
LU
> 03
CO g
Q o
03 O
0 )
o
c
M s
3
CA
O
CL
X w
LU o>
Z'
CO
Q
03
CT)
2
0 03
> !fc
< —I
>*
O
c C
03 O
cr 2
2 d
LL Q
CA CA
8 . 8 .
X X
LU LU
c
3 3
O O
73 73
O O
■D O O
S 75 t > - _
m (0 CO 03 0
IP •*- •— Q_ Q.
LL C C
03 O O
* CA CA
3 _
CA 03
&S
iu 8
03 03
C C
O) 03
0 0
U u_
0 0
> >
< <
o
CL
LU
03
0
(A
o
□L
LU
5
CA
73
03
Q.
CL
0
CA
E
03
E
to
° o
CL
LU
0
73
0
CA
3
C
O
LU
a
3
o „
o. il O o. in n
LU LU LU LU O O
c o
CL O.
< <
0 *o
-b o
c
0
o
c
8
0
O t-
co
3
CO cr
Q. 03
0 «-
o O
-id **-
b •$<
CL 0
CA *-
2
.. <
0
o <
z
o
0
o
CL
c
0
E
c
o
L-
‘>
c
LU
c
0
E
tr
0
CL
0
O
CA
0
CA
3
.£=
O
0
CA
II
CL
LU
Q
CA
0 <2
> 2
0 ^
L_
-Q
2
<
c
o
<
o
(/)
aS
E
05
CO
wT
aj
a>
E
CO
CO
CL
Q.
LU
Q
£
LL
J*
(/)
ir
o
5
0 .
Exposure Pathway: Exposure to Oust via Gastrointestinal Tract
o cm «n
iZ
Q
5
LU ®
d <
'k c
O o
q: -
"E
CO
>-
<
d>
E
Q
O
<
5
g
co
a?
s
Q
D
<
8
Q
Q
| £
& "5
1 I
O a
oo O
CO <
£ ^ O
.-£0)0.
f a> x
^0)
° ® m
CD CO ©
■O T5 5
D)
2 O
d) a
05 co
co u_
a) d>
5 x
LU
' <
0.
<9 co
E u
d) o>
£ O)
Q
x
« 0- •
■2 LU
■2 Q .
LU
□
CO j
O
2 a
CD
<
<
Z
CD
<
<
Z
CD
<
I—
7
a
£
? |
Q
.Z
2 £
a> ir Jr
8. i
< □ LU (/) UJ LU
I
5
1 Q I
Q Q O 5
s <; Si a
. S ■o S
§1
"-I
Q. (/)
LU O
O £
c/> Q-
(0 d)
CD
9
*L CD
<5 LU
_ co <<
^ GO _
CD ^
8 ?
O
1 ?
& &
2 ¥
2 ? ?
CD
$
CD
2 o
CL Q.
< <
o
2
ts p
d
^E
€
c
"E
f 5
Q
LU
O CD CM
*
O 2
<d
Q a>
uj —
x
K .E
> E
x a,
o ^
1>
E
a.
'8 g
o >- cc
J \170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DenvatoonVDust Monrtonng\Area 5\171521 10 Risk (Resident)\Parameters
TABLE I-6A File No. 171521.10
RESIDENT EXPOSURE PROFILE Pa 9 e 2 of 2
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area 4/1 5/2015
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
J:\170.000-179,999\171521 \171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Denvabon\Dust Monitonng\Area 5\171521.10 Risk (Resident)\Parameters QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
o •«- in
o o
0)
r o)^:
LI nj m-
CL
o
Z
©
<
h-
CO
h-
O
LLJ
LL
U_
LU
O
z
LU
O
O
z
o
q:
<
o
z
o
z
TO
■Q
CD
E
<D
cr
■U —
S w
Q. TO
2 TO
Ql >
(A
l *
TO g
o> -g
.2 TO
O) w
TO £
CO
2
O
CL
CO
LU
QC
C /5
o
Q
>~
cr
<
ID
C /5
TO
TO
i—
<
m
4 :
TO
V 47
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
o>
O)
o>
O)
O)
O)
O)
3
TO
>
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
(0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Q.
"O
TO
O)
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
>* 2
■0 ■£
O)
lx
o>
Oft
d
d
Oft
O)
o>
O)
O
a
2
c
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
16
16
TO
CO S
b
*b
b
b
O
O
b
O
b
b
O
TO
(/>
O)
=3
Q.
>N
•7s
O
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
> 2
E
(A
</>
TO
(A
10
<0
X
TD fc
D
3
c
D
3
3
c
3 c
^_r
O
O
O
O
O
0
CO <
TO
2
E
E
o>
2
E
E
TO
k.
E
E
o o
X TO
C 5 t
O LU
E
TO
V
co
TO ^
P Eft
TO
TO O
O 3
TO
_ i g
2 o £
O^a)
o TO
cr
0
TO
>
c
O
TO
0
c
TO
■O
£
CD
CO
6 )
O
X
3
TO
TO
ns
Q
03
C
^ —
TO TO TO TO
d 2S d d
TO TO TO TO
0 0 0 0
C C C
TO TO TO
E E E _
3 3 3 TO
-C -C -C ™
CO
3
o
c
TO
>
— TO
TO
n C
c c
TO TO
E E
3 D
.c x:
■o
c
TO
TO g
t 2
>»
o
X
o
o
i—
.c
CL
TO
c
■O
c
TO
g>
i
>N
TO
c
ID
lx
■D
C
TO
C
TO
O)
O
£
TO
&
O
X
o
TO
Q.
£
O
£
TO
■o
TO
2
TO
</)
X
O
X
03
■O
TO
03
O
O
TO
H
CO o>
£ §
o) E
| £
* fc =
O > TO
(/) — =
"O TO
0) O
<5 -a
2 o
2 o
£5
TO
>* i—
■o
c
TO
03
c
TO
■o
TO
3
•a
TO
E
TO
> V
m >»
C *
"U d)
lx C
t . 3 t t
TO E TO q>
|E j|
o
TO —
TO
TO ^
11
° -8
TO X
TO 03
03 CO
0 CO
TO
O) O
O) X
TO TO
>
•a
o
X
TO
O
±= "O
TO TO
Q. (0
O TO
f p O
lx n
dT ■o
c o
-g o
~x X
x
g>
1
>»
■D
O
X
*o
TO
(0
TO
TO
O
TO
■o
>1
X
o
XI
_TO
O
gj
I
c
TO
03
O
TD
TO
<0
TO
TO
k_
a
TO
■a
03
O
o
TO
3
X
D
x
o
■O
TO
C
o
CO
■O
c
TO
03
c
TO
E
o
-9
'to
■O
TO
E
TO
TO
T 3
■o
C
TO
O
■o
c
TO
£ CO
to
£ 2;
is
1 i
3 s.
TO
•o
■o
O
C CO
.2 o
i g
C TO
® TO
E co
.05
a. >
C -Q
2L ro
£ 8
TO
x -o
.1 |
^ TO
O CO
»- X 3
CL O
c i2
S o
TO
\E
C TO
.O) 0
CO c
TO -2
15
o -o
s ^
'S.1
•- fe.
CD
iS C
TO -O
Q lx
TO
c
D
E
E
TO
C
■O
E >»
TO TO
£,;!<•§<
co co Z lx Z
TO
11
1-°. _
If 8
5 B 2
•Q X CL
TO
CO
CO
o
c t-
TO >
-rr O
TO k-
C 0 TO
cn
z
o
■o'
o
o
Xi
2 E
X X
_ o o
3 8 8
CO CO
X
o
X X
o o
8 8
CO CO
o
o
o
CO
TO *•— TO**— TO**— »«-
O
O
O
CO
TO $
X
o
o
CO
X X
CO CO
CO
X x
O §
CO
X X
CO CO
JD X
E TO TO w TO
TO* TO
TO
o'
TO
TO
-O
CO
0
0
OD
X
03
m
0
0
CD
0
co
0
E
0
p
d
d
d
COCOCOCOCOCMCOCO
00000000
dddddddo
co cnj co co co
o p o o o o o
d d d d d d d
- 0 - “ 5
CM
0
CO
^_
CO
m
h-
CO
in
in
, - 0
m
— 3
Q- 0
n
k_
TO
0
8
0
0
p
d
0.2
0.00
0
0
d
O
8
O
O
O
d
0
0
d
0
0
d
W (Z)
5 •B
0
d
Is
8
0
k_
• Ti
-Q X
n n TO TO
■o' n
TO
o'
m
o
o
o
d
CM CO COCOCOCOCOqCOCO
dd^ddddd^do
o
o
M- CO CM CO CO CO
d CD d d <D d
m
o
o
o
o
o
CM
o
m
r^-
co
in
m
0
0
Pi
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
d
d
d
d
o
o
O
TO
8 f
I £ 8
x: x= to
Q. Q. U
TO TO TO
C C C
I g III
TO
TO
TO TO TO
TO
S v ^ Q.
f
TO
-C
LLJ
CM
C §
d LL X U.
TO
TO C
C TO
TO -C
^ TO
TO 2
0 - o
. 0 * D
TO^ ;0
o' o'
^ i
TO TO
CO CO
o o
11
TO TO
CO CD
8
TO
C
TO - 2 -
C O
TO N
II
C
TO
1 —
a
o
N
C
TO
XI
8
TO
5*
1
TO
CM*
r 8
CO O Q Q u
TO •«-
2 ¥
s«
rr c
TO
c
w TO
£ TO
Z 0.
o
€
S
o
V—
■O
>S
1
E
o
TO
2
TO
CL
TO
* O
(0
c
TO
-C
g.
co
.2
t
.2 c ■—
c 2 c
TO
o
E
D
O
CM
i_
TO
Xl
E
TO
O
TO
Q
*♦—
o
(/>
TO
TO
CL
TO
d
TO
E
TO
QC
TO
S'
C
TO
O)
TO
E
LU
i
o
TO
(A
C
o
Q.
(0
TO
DC
TO
E
LU
m to
^ <i)
o
•C
TO
C
TO
O
C /5
c
TO
P
’</>
TO
QC
■c
o
-C
CO
c
TO
E
to
</>
TO
</)
< ^
S -3i
3 -S
5 ™
CM O
a> n
cn r:
o
CL
si
TO U ~
(0 r£
| o
o TO
« 2
- o.
1^
|£
■o 1
<U CL
E <S “2
fe 2 8
1 = TO .
TO ,
a.
</>
E .
TO
•c
TO ..2
« V N
5 ! p
o 4 ^ TO TO -C
< 00 o o
■O
TO
TO
2 to 2
® TO £
2 CO CO
>>
c
TO
t
TO
O
C
3
o
a
8
C
TO
u.
2
TO
DC
II
o
* 4 —
cr
to '
XJ
1
a.
f
o
Z
11
<
z
■o
o
* S €
$
J:M 70,000-179,999V171521\171521 -00 DELV2015 PM10 DerivationVDust Monitoring\Area 5\171521.10 Chem lnfo\DRNCO QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
o
y- in
I] o o
™ - Cf
in
m
UJ JJ Ml
CL
6
z
<
o
z
o
K
3
<
X
o
LU
UJ
o
z
UJ
o
o
±: <
o
VC,
<
O
z
o
z
c
2 co
S ■s g
T3 (0 «
© >- U
E o> o
® .S «
X O) «o
■o i3 -
2 co
CD
Ul
CO
o
Q
U.
o
>-
or
<
2
2
3
CO
*3 -
0 t2
S 2
> ©
Ul >
UJ
-I
If
CO IE
s I
CO <
S ts
s e
o ui
o
©
Its
©
■O
c
©
e
to
a)
>>
C/5
a) c
? a
H 6
y o
C -
5 w y
t ra a.
O -g
| y
to o
<5 £
ll-e o
Ik
£ c
TO TO gl
TO C -i-
a. o
o
c y m I
I g g 2 £
TO £ £ c fj
TO O TO TO gl
II 5 a £
- w «r O
o
o
o
. TO
.81
CD D
IS
| TO
C
1.8 £
trad)
m O) ©
2 O E
C O Q-
J c o
© ^ ©
CL E >
© p ©
f- c TJ
d
-§8
©
©
-C
c
=3
o
E
CL
©
C
©
Q.
©
©
E
TD
C
©
©
&
c
©
*2
©
c
©
©
-C
o
1
CL
CO
©
O
O
o
CO
o
o
o
© — ~ — —
— — — © ~ ~ Q.© Q) _Q ©
© © 0
00
o
00
o
CM
O
o
o
CM
8
o
UOIDLOLOLOUOUOLO
OOOOOOOO
dddddddo
mmiomifiifiinifio
dddddoddP
o
10
0
10
0
LO
O
10
0
LO
O
CO
0
0
CO
0
10
0
CO
0
CM
0
0
0
CM
0
0
0
LO
0
0
Q
CM
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
n
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
0
d
0
d
d
0
d
d
d
0 <=>
-
-
-
-
■0
-
cl -o
T 3
-O
■0
c,af
T 3
p
j'p
CO
CM
0
CM
O
LO
CM
0
CO
O
8 2
10
lO
10
CO
10
0
10
CO
CO
0
O
O
0
O
O
8 s
d
d
d
d
d
0
d
d
d
d
0
0
d
O
O
d
O
d
0
0
d
O
O
O
d
8 0
d 0
s
o
1
<
5
1
O
€
© ^
c ©
„ g p g I
C TO £ TO O
© m c >« _2
£ £ C < 9^ Li_
o. o. 8 SS.S
© © CD O O O
o o c © © © _
<<<CQC0C0CQC0CQ
o o £ £ © ^ © o §
*J!aS?§§22:€-g§!
3 3« &£ t e'SS
OQQLi-Li. — ZQ-Q-h— Q-<COO
©
O
E
D
E
2
_c
O
p 3
o 6 u © h a
■o
c
D
O
CO
iC
C
©
CO -Q
© <
o
z ^
o
d
©
©
tr
©
o
c
3
O
O
©
o
c
©
©
©
X
11
O
£
u
O
d
©
11
Li_
2
E
8
c
o
O
c
o
O
11
O
o
o
E
©
CO 2
11
^ ©
© o
S "
52
< o
J:\170.000-179,999\171521V171521 -00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MomtoringWea 5M71521.10 Chem ln(o\DRNCI
■ o o
s - £
£ S?5
2
5
o
HI
Lil
o
o
o
z
o
tz
<
o
Q T3
!I
J o
CQ ll
< ?
HI
CO
z
O
CL
CO
ID
tr
c
O «/,
.? * s
■O <0 </>
0) >* 3
E a>-g
®. E to
QC o) to
■O 2 52
8 w
TO
ID
CO
O
o
Ll
o
>
o:
<
3
<0
O C -
CL TO *3
o»®
Q_ > ©
HI >
TO UJ
0)
<
LO
<
CO
>. TO
2 i
»I
E _
a "c
to °
® >5
O) CO TO
TO c TO
» ~ ^
TO c W E
*3it O
TO
Q.
TO O
•o ?
TO o
c
c
c
TO
TO
TO
E
TO
E
E
3
3
3
-C
-C
TO
c
to TO i_
TO
o
c
.E E ^
o -
CD
-O
o
TO
CD
d
>
3
TO
CL
° E 5
x|®
CD
c
.3
TO
"O
TO
O
10 TO*
CO
tT
CO
O'
in
CD
m
CO
O’
M-
CO
CO CM
UJ
LD
UJ
LD
HI
HJ
HJ
ID
LD
LD
LD
LLJ UJ
O
T—
T—
t—
■«—
CO
T—
t—
O
O
00 CM
If)
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
^ T ~
TO
>x TO
^ E
CO
TO
O) CO TO
_ TO TO o
s g &!
° o w
5 8
2 §
Si
^ TO
TO E
LD
CO
T- O T—
O O o
LD LD UJ
CO CO CO
N-
O) TO O) O)
(M (M CM O
O O O o
LD LD LLJ LL|
CO CO CO
T- fsj
o
LLJ
CO
TOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTO
TO TO TO TO TO
•i £
li
o E
3 2
Qf"\ CN| CM CM « CM CM CM CM pi o CM < n CM ^ CM «
‘- 1 CQG0GQ a GQCD00 0Q t - 1 ‘-- 1 ^G0^^^ aO^-^CO^CO^^^
t » i: q.
TO C
C TO
TO £
TO
£
o
€
c ©
TO >*
TO
c 2
TO O
5, _3
H LL
TO D CJ) I
TO _
0- O
^ 3
TO TO fD
C C £=
8 TO i=
O C
< < <
>*
£
HJ
ccccc-
TO TO TO TO TO ^
CD CD CD CD CD CD
e to
if £
O O
i= ®
c c
TO TO
oS TO
CM" ©
w TO
£
o
TO W
8 f
2 I
-O -C
>» CL
i m
m E ■o
TO D TO
C Q) m
2 I 2
.c £ -c
1
O
• ? ? * C S c E ! E 3 5
2^«Jr>,ool!!TO(or®®(i) =
LL.EZQ.a/1— Q-<CQOQjSC0C0
- E 2 p
c E c c
TO o
£ 3
O Ll
3
5:
o
O
CM
CD
TO
■o
X
Ll
> CO
O
>
X
o
CL
E
o
o
1- x
6 J
CD CL
t- C
o g
§■ g
* TO
CO £
§2
<
<
i
ID
X
o
£
E
o
O
. x
-C «
o
c
TO
1 ® 8
2 s c
® % ®
.Q TO ^2
8 2 5
o o o
0- Z Z
d Q ID
co
c
TO
E
CO 3
TO -C
T3 C
.3 |
§ >
i 0)
—1 _ ©
- ^ >
^ I
TO c X
^ O'
o c *_
CL TO
-S O o
TO T3
!^o
» gff
E 8
o “
•fc JO
-Q TO TO
TO ^ CL
5 Q°
to To
11
= $ w
1 S
^ O c
S S 3
® ^ 3
.c c
.E
>* o
E
O)
Q k_ O'
o C
3.
o £ °>
TO
D i/l £ (1)
- ©
1 O
S’ c
TO
Q.
C
TO
CD
O
c -
o ©
3 £
CD C -o >
O TO ^ TO
E E TO V
2 2 -o to
8 o s :s
c u E
CQ CO
E 4
3 2 t- CM
X 0. CD CD
IE
3
CO
< CD
TO
£
TO
-Q
TO
3
TO
TO
Q.
O
CO
o
E
8
o
8
05
to P
3 5
o
c
TO
CD
c |
11
TO J 2
I 8
II
n
<8
o
TABLE 1-1OA
RELATIVE ABSORPTION FACTORS
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/15/2015
COC
Exposure Pathways
Oral Soil
Carcinogen Non-Carcinogen
Acetone
1 a
Trichloroethene
1 a
1 a
Acenaphthene
0.3 a
Acenaphthylene
0.3 a
Anthracene
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.3 a
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1 a
1 a
Chrysene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
0.3 a
Fluorene
0.3 a
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.28 a
0.28 a
Naphthalene
0.3 a
Phenanthrene
0.3 a
Pyrene
0.3 a
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
0.3 f
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1 a
1 a
Arsenic
0.5 a
0.5 a
Barium
1 a
Cadmium
1 a
Chromium (total)
1 a
Lead
0.3 c
Mercury
0.5 a
Selenium
1 a
Silver
1 a
Notes:
a. MassDEP 2014 ShortForm (v0414.xlsx).
c. USEPA 2007. User’s Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for
Lead in Children (IEUBK) Windows.
f. Value for C11-C22 aromatic hydrocarbons used for total petreleum hydrocarbon (TPH).
Notes:
1. A blank space indicates no data found.
2. Where data are lacking, a default value of 1 is used in subsequent risk calculations.
Abbreviations:
COC = Constituent of Concern; RAF = Relative Absorption Factors.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521 \171521 -00.DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monitoring\Area 5M71521.10 Chem InfcARAF
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE I-11A
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
HQsoil-oral “
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPCsoil * IRsoil * EF * ED * EP * RAF oraklc * Cl
BW * AP nc
ADDgoii.orai j_j| _
n, soil-oral
RfD
S HQ sol |_ ora |
COC
EPC S0ll
RAF ora |_ nc
ADD S0 j|_ 0ra i
RfD
HQsoil-oral
EPC1
SubChronic
(mg/kg)
(unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
(unitless)
Acetone
0.020
1
2.7E-10
2.7E+00
1.0E-10
Trichloroethene
0.0028
1
3.7E-11
5.0E-04
7.5E-08
Acenaphthene
1.2
0.3
4.9E-09
2.0E-01
2.4E-08
Acenaphthylene
0.92
0.3
3.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.2E-08
Anthracene
2.9
0.3
1.2E-08
1.0E+00
1.2E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
7.1
0.3
2.9E-08
3.0E-01
9.6E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
6.1
0.3
2.5E-08
3.0E-01
8.2E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
7.6
0.3
3. IE-08
3.0E-01
1.0E-07
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
1.7
0.3
6.9E-09
3.0E-01
2.3E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3.6
0.3
1.4E-08
3.0E-01
4.8E-08
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.98
1
1.3E-08
2.0E-02
6.6E-07
Chrysene
6.6
0.3
2.7E-08
3.0E-01
8.9E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.44
0.3
1.8E-09
3.0E-01
6.0E-09
Dibenzofuran
1.0
1
1.4E-08
4.0E-03
3.5E-06
Fluoranthene
14
0.3
5.7E-08
4.0E-01
1.4E-07
Fluorene
1.6
0.3
6.4E-09
4.0E-01
1.6E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
1.8
0.28
6.7E-09
3.0E-01
2.2E-08
Naphthalene
0.34
0.3
1 4E-09
2.0E-01
7.0E-09
Phenanthrene
9.2
0.3
3.7E-08
3.0E-01
1.2E-07
Pyrene
10
0.3
4.1E-08
3.0E-01
1.4E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
520
0.3
2.1E-06
3.0E-01
7.0E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
15
1
2.0E-07
5.0E-05
4. IE-03
Arsenic
951
0.5
6.4E-06
3.0E-04
2. IE-02
Barium
89
1
1.2E-06
7.0E-02
1.7E-05
Cadmium
1.6
1
2.1E-08
1.0E-03
2. IE-05
Chromium (total)
32
1
4.3E-07
2.0E-02
2.2E-05
Lead
2488
0.3
1.0E-05
7.5E-04
1.3E-02
Mercury
7.3
0.5
4.9E-08
3.0E-04
1.6E-04
Selenium
4.8
1
6.4E-08
5.0E-03
1.3E-05
Silver
0.84
1
1. IE-08
5.0E-03
2.3E-06
HI soil-oral ~
3.9E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monitoring\Area 5M71521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Soil Ingest (Non-Cancer)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE I-11A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 2
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
LADD S0 ||-o ra i
ELCR S oil-oral —
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPCsoii * IRsoi, * EF * ED * EP * RAF oral _c * Cl
LADD so n_ ora i * CSF
BW * AP C
Total ELCR soi |_o ra i =
^ ELCR S0 ||^ ra |
COC
EPC soi i
RAF ora |_c
LADD SO j|-oral
CSF
ELCR soik)ra i
EPC1
(mg/kg)
(unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day) -1
(unitless)
Acetone
0.020
1
1.94E-12
NA
NC
Trichloroethene
0.0028
1
2.68E-13
4.6E-02
1.2E-14
Acenaphthene
1.2
1
1.16E-10
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
0.92
1
8.83E-11
NA
NC
Anthracene
2.9
1
2.77E-10
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
7.1
0.3
2.06E-10
7.3E-01
1.5E-10
Benzo(a)Pyrene
6.1
0.3
1.75E-10
7.3E+00
1.3E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
7.6
0.3
2.20E-10
7.3E-01
1.6E-10
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
1.7
1
1.64E-10
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3.6
0.3
1.03E-10
7.3E-02
7.5E-12
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.98
1
9.40E-11
1.4E-02
1.3E-12
Chrysene
6.6
0.3
1.91E-10
7.3E-02
1.4E-11
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.44
0.3
1.28E-11
7.3E+00
9.3E-11
Dibenzofuran
1.0
1
1.00E-10
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
14
1
1.35E-09
NA
NC
Fluorene
1.6
1
1.53E-10
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
1.8
0.28
4.79E-11
7.3E-01
3.5E-11
Naphthalene
0.34
1
3.32E-11
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
9.2
1
8.82E-10
NA
NC
Pyrene
10
1
9.67E-10
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
520
1
5.00E-08
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
15
1
1.46E-09
2.0E+00
2.9E-09
Arsenic
951
0.5
4.57E-08
1.5E+00
6.9E-08
Barium
89
1
8.52E-09
NA
NC
Cadmium
1.6
1
1.51E-10
NA
NC
Chromium (total)
32
1
3.09E-09
NA
NC
Lead
2488
1
2.39E-07
NA
NC
Mercury
7.3
1
7.03E-10
NA
NC
Selenium
4.8
1
4.57E-10
NA
NC
Silver
0.84
1
8.06E-11
NA
NC
Totsl ELCR SO j|-oral
7.3E-08
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable
\ 170 , 000 - 1 79,99911715211171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 DerivationlDust MonitoringlArea 51171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP paramelers)Soil Ingest (Cancer)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/15/2015
TABLE 1-12A
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5A for Exposure Variables and
Rationale. See TABLE I-4A for Exposure
Point Concentration Derivation
ADE dust =
HQdust =
Inhalation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
Z HQ dust
ADEdust
AP n c
HI, =
RfC
COC
EPC dust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
ADE dust
(mg/m 3 )
RfC
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
HQdust
(unitless)
Acetone
3.0E-09
5.8E-10
8.0E-01
7.2E-10
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
7.9E-11
2.0E-03
4.0E-08
Acenaphthene
1.8E-07
3.4E-08
5.0E-01
6.9E-08
Acenaphthylene
1.4E-07
2.6E-08
5.0E-01
5.2E-08
Anthracene
4.3E-07
8.2E-08
5.0E-01
1.6E-07
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
2.0E-07
5.0E-01
4. IE-07
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9. IE-07
1.7E-07
5.0E-01
3.5E-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
2.2E-07
5.0E-01
4.4E-07
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
4.9E-08
5.0E-01
9.7E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
1.0E-07
5.0E-01
2.0E-07
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
2.8E-08
7.0E-03
4.0E-06
Chrysene
9.9E-07
1.9E-07
5.0E-01
3.8E-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
1.3E-08
5.0E-01
2.5E-08
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
3.0E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2.1E-06
4.0E-07
5.0E-01
8.0E-07
Fluorene
2.4E-07
4.5E-08
5.0E-01
9. IE-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
5. IE-08
5.0E-01
1.0E-07
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
9.8E-09
3.0E-03
3.3E-06
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
2.6E-07
5.0E-01
5.2E-07
Pyrene
1.5E-06
2.9E-07
5.0E-01
5.7E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
1.5E-05
5.0E-01
3.0E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
4.3E-07
2.0E-05
2.2E-02
Arsenic
1.4E-04
2.7E-05
2.0E-05
1.4E+00
Barium
1.3E-05
2.5E-06
5.0E-03
5. IE-04
Cadmium
2.4E-07
4.5E-08
2.0E-05
2.2E-03
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
9.2E-07
3.0E-04
3. IE-03
Lead
3.7E-04
7. IE-05
1.0E-03
7. IE-02
Mercury
1. IE-06
2.1E-07
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
Selenium
7.1E-07
1.4E-07
3.0E-03
4.5E-05
Silver
1.3E-07
2.4E-08
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
Hldust|
1E+00
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dusl MonitoringtArea 5M71521.10 Risk (FW-DEP para meters) Fugitive Dust (Non-Cancer)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-12A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 2
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
j
Inhalation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
See TABLE I-5A for Exposure Variables and
EPCdust * EF
* ED * EP * C2 *C3
Rationale and TABLE I-4A for Exposure
Point Concentration Derivation
AP C
ELCRd US t =
LADEdust * UR
Total ELCRdust =
S ELCRdust
COC
EPCdust
LADE dust
UR
ELCRdust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
(pg/m 3 )
(pg/m 3 )' 1
(unitless)
Acetone
3.0E-09
4.1E-09
NA
NC
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
5.7E-10
5.0E-06
2.8E-15
Acenaphthene
1.8E-07
2.5E-07
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
1.4E-07
1.9E-07
NA
NC
Anthracene
4.3E-07
5.9E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
1.5E-06
2.1E-04
3.0E-10
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9. IE-07
1.2E-06
2.1E-03
2.6E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
1.6E-06
2.1E-04
3.2E-10
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
3.5E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
7.3E-07
2.1E-05
1.5E-11
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
2.0E-07
1.3E-06
2.6E-13
Chrysene
9.9E-07
1.3E-06
2.1E-05
2.8E-11
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
9.0E-08
2.1E-03
1.9E-10
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
2.1E-07
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2.1E-06
2.9E-06
NA
NC
Fluorene
2.4E-07
3.2E-07
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
3.6E-07
2.1E-04
7.6E-11
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
7.0E-08
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
1.9E-06
NA
NC
Pyrene
1.5E-06
2.1E-06
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
1. IE-04
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
3. IE-06
1.0E-04
3.IE-10
Arsenic
1.4E-04
1.9E-04
3.0E-03
5.8E-07
Barium
1.3E-05
1.8E-05
NA
NC
Cadmium
2.4E-07
3.2E-07
1.8E-03
5.8E-10
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
6.6E-06
1.2E-02
7.9E-08
Lead
3.7E-04
5.1E-04
NA
NC
Mercury
1. IE-06
1.5E-06
NA
NC
Selenium
7. IE-07
9.7E-07
NA
NC
Silver
1.3E-07
1.7E-07
NA
NC
Total ELCRdust:)
6.7E-07
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J \170.000-179,999M71521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MomtoringlArea 5\17152110 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Fugitive Dust (Cancer)
QA. CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13A
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No, 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
RQsoil-oral ”
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC S01| * IR soil * EF * ED * EP * RAF
BW * AP nc
ADD SO j|_o ral
RfD
* PI
oral-nc w 1
^soil-oral "
^ HQsoil-oral i
COC
EPCsoh
RAF ora i_ nc
ADD SO j|_Q ra |
RfD
RQsoil-oral
EPC1
Subchronic
(mg/kg)
(unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
(unitless)
Acetone
0.020
1
4.4E-11
2.7E+00
1.6E-11
Trichloroethene
0.0028
1
6.0E-12
5.0E-04
1.2E-08
Acenaphthene
1.2
0.3
7.8E-10
2.0E-01
3.9E-09
Acenaphthylene
0.92
0.3
6.0E-10
3.0E-01
2.0E-09
Anthracene
2.9
0.3
1.9E-09
1.0E+00
1.9E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
7.1
0.3
4.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
6.1
0.3
3.9E-09
3.0E-01
1.3E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
7.6
0.3
5.0E-09
3.0E-01
1.7E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
1.7
0.3
1. IE-09
3.0E-01
3.7E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3.6
0.3
2.3E-09
3.0E-01
7.7E-09
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.98
1
2. IE-09
2.0E-02
1.1E-07
Chrysene
6.6
0.3
4.3E-09
3.0E-01
1.4E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.44
0.3
2.9E-10
3.0E-01
9.6E-10
Dibenzofuran
1.0
1
2.3E-09
4.0E-03
5.6E-07
Fluoranthene
14
0.3
9. IE-09
4.0E-01
2.3E-08
Fluorene
1.6
0.3
1.0E-09
4.0E-01
2.6E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
1.8
0.28
1. IE-09
3.0E-01
3.6E-09
Naphthalene
0.34
0.3
2.2E-10
2.0E-01
1. IE-09
Phenanthrene
9.2
0.3
5.9E-09
3.0E-01
2.0E-08
Pyrene
10
0.3
6.5E-09
3.0E-01
2.2E-08
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
520
0.3
3.4E-07
3.0E-01
1. IE-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
15
1
3.3E-08
5.0E-05
6.6E-04
Arsenic
951
0.5
1.0E-06
3.0E-04
3.4E-03
Barium
89
1
1.9E-07
7.0E-02
2.7E-06
Cadmium
1.6
1
3.4E-09
1.0E-03
3.4E-06
Chromium (total)
32
1
6.9E-08
2.0E-02
3.5E-06
Lead
2488
0.3
1.6E-06
7.5E-04
2.2E-03
Mercury
7.3
0.5
7.9E-09
3.0E-04
2.6E-05
Selenium
4.8
1
1.0E-08
5.0E-03
2. IE-06
Silver
0.84
1
1.8E-09
5.0E-03
3.6E-07
Hloral =
6.3E-03
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170,000-179,999M71521M71521-00 DEL12015 PM10 Denvation\Dust MonitoringlArea 51171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (1<2)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521 10
Page 2 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADDgoii.orai
HQsoil-oral ”
Exposure to Dust
EPC soil *
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IR SO ii * EF * ED * EP * RAF ora i nc * Cl
X HQ S0 ||_ 0ra i
ADD SO j|o ra i
BW * AP nc
^soil-oral ”
RfD
EPC soi i
RAF oral-nc
ADD soi |_o ra i
RfD
HQsoil-oral
EPC1
SubChronic
(mg/kg)
^unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
(unitless)
0.020
1
1.9E-10
2.7E+00
6.9E-11
0.0028
1
2.6E-11
5.0E-04
5. IE-08
1.2
0.3
3.3E-09
2.0E-01
1.7E-08
0.92
0.3
2.5E-09
3.0E-01
8.5E-09
2.9
0.3
8.0E-09
1.0E+00
8.0E-09
7.1
0.3
2.0E-08
3.0E-01
6.6E-08
6.1
0.3
1.7E-08
3.0E-01
5.6E-08
7.6
0.3
2. IE-08
3.0E-01
7.0E-08
1.7
0.3
4.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.6E-08
3.6
0.3
9.9E-09
3.0E-01
3.3E-08
0.98
1
9.0E-09
2.0E-02
4.5E-07
6.6
0.3
1.8E-08
3.0E-01
6.1E-08
0.44
0.3
1.2E-09
3.0E-01
4.1E-09
1.0
1
9.6E-09
4.0E-03
2.4E-06
14
0.3
3.9E-08
4.0E-01
9.7E-08
1.6
0.3
4.4E-09
4.0E-01
1. IE-08
1.8
0.28
4.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
0.34
0.3
9.6E-10
2.0E-01
4.8E-09
9.2
0.3
2.5E-08
3.0E-01
8.5E-08
10
0.3
2.8E-08
3.0E-01
9.3E-08
520
0.3
1.4E-06
3.0E-01
4.8E-06
15
1
1.4E-07
5.0E-05
2.8E-03
951
0.5
4.4E-06
3.0E-04
1.5E-02
89
1
8.2E-07
7.0E-02
1.2E-05
1.6
1
1.4E-08
1.0E-03
1.4E-05
32
1
3.0E-07
2.0E-02
1.5E-05
2488
0.3
6.9E-06
7.5E-04
9.2E-03
7.3
0.5
3.4E-08
3.0E-04
1. IE-04
4.8
1
4.4E-08
5.0E-03
8.8E-06
0.84
1
7.7E-09
5.0E-03
1.5E-06
HI oral —
2.7E-02
COC
Acetone
T richloroethene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
000-179,99911715211171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MonitoringlArea 51171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (7<8)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
RQsoil-oral “
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC SO ji * IRson * EF * ED * EP * RAF
* PI
oral-nc ° 1
S HQ so ,|. ora i
ADDsoji^jrai
BW * AP nc
^soil-oral —
RfD
COC
EPC S oii
RAF or ai- n c
ADDsoji.Qrai
RfD
HQsoj|-oral
EPC1
SubChronic
(unitless)
(mg/kg)
^unitless^)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
Acetone
0.020
1
3.5E-10
2.7E+00
1.3E-10
Trichloroethene
0.0028
1
4.8E-11
5.0E-04
9.7E-08
Acenaphthene
1.2
0.3
6.3E-09
2.0E-01
3.1E-08
Acenaphthylene
0.92
0.3
4.8E-09
3.0E-01
1.6E-08
Anthracene
2.9
0.3
1.5E-08
1.0E+00
1.5E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
7.1
0.3
3.7E-08
3.0E-01
1 2E-07
Benzo(a)Pyrene
6.1
0.3
3.2E-08
3.0E-01
1. IE-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
7.6
0.3
4.0E-08
3.0E-01
1 3E-07
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
1.7
0.3
8.9E-09
3.0E-01
3.0E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
3.6
0.3
1.9E-08
3.0E-01
6.2E-08
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.98
1
1.7E-08
2.0E-02
8.5E-07
Chrysene
6.6
0.3
3.4E-08
3.0E-01
1. IE-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
044
0.3
2.3E-09
3.0E-01
7.7E-09
Dibenzofuran
1.0
1
1.8E-08
4.0E-03
4.5E-06
Fluoranthene
14
0.3
7.3E-08
4.0E-01
1.8E-07
Fluorene
1.6
0.3
8.3E-09
4.0E-01
2.1E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
1.8
0.28
8.7E-09
3.0E-01
2.9E-08
Naphthalene
0.34
0.3
1.8E-09
2.0E-01
9.0E-09
Phenanthrene
9.2
0.3
4.8E-08
3.0E-01
1 6E-07
Pyrene
10
0.3
5.2E-08
3.0E-01
1.7E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
520
0.3
2.7E-06
3.0E-01
9.0E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
15
1
2.6E-07
5.0E-05
5.3E-03
Arsenic
951
0.5
8.3E-06
3.0E-04
2.8E-02
Barium
89
1
1.5E-06
7.0E-02
2.2E-05
Cadmium
1.6
1
2.7E-08
1.0E-03
2.7E-05
Chromium (total)
32
1
5.6E-07
2.0E-02
2.8E-05
Lead
2488
0.3
1.3E-05
7.5E-04
1.7E-02
Mercury
7.3
0.5
6.4E-08
3.0E-04
2.1E-04
Selenium
4.8
1
8.3E-08
5.0E-03
1.7E-05
Silver
0.84
1
1.5E-08
5.0E-03
2.9E-06
Hloral =
5.0E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 Denvation\Dust MonitonnglArea 51171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (65)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 4 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE l-4Afor Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
COC
LADDsoji-orai
ELCR S0 |i_o ra i ~
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC soi i * IRsoii * EF * ED * EP * RAF oral _ c * Cl
ELCR SO ||_ ora i
LADD soil _o ral * CSF
BW * AP C
Total ELCRgoji^rai
EPC soil
RAF ora i^
LADD so ii-oral
CSF
ELCR SO j|_ ra i
EPC1
(mg/kg)
(unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)' 1
(unitless)
0.020
1
2.5E-12
NA
NC
0.0028
1
3.5E-13
4.6E-02
1.59E-14
1.2
1
1.5E-10
NA
NC
0.92
1
1.IE-10
NA
NC
2.9
1
3.6E-10
NA
NC
7.1
0.3
2.7E-10
7.3E-01
1.95E-10
6.1
0.3
2.3E-10
7.3E+00
1.65E-09
7.6
0.3
2.8E-10
7.3E-01
2.08E-10
1.7
1
2.IE-10
NA
NC
3.6
0.3
1.3E-10
7.3E-02
9.71E-12
0.98
1
1.2E-10
1.4E-02
1.70E-12
6.6
0.3
2.5E-10
7.3E-02
1.80E-11
0.44
0.3
1.6E-11
7.3E+00
1.20E-10
1.0
1
1.3E-10
NA
NC
14
1
1.7E-09
NA
NC
1.6
1
2.0E-10
NA
NC
1.8
0.28
6.2E-11
7.3E-01
4.52E-11
0.34
1
4.3E-11
NA
NC
9.2
1
1. IE-09
NA
NC
10
1
1.2E-09
NA
NC
520
1
6.5E-08
NA
NC
15
1
1.9E-09
2.0E+00
3.77E-09
951
0.5
5.9E-08
1.5E+00
8.86E-08
89
1
1. IE-08
NA
NC
1.6
1
1.9E-10
NA
NC
32
1
4.0E-09
NA
NC
2488
1
3.1E-07
NA
NC
7.3
1
9.IE-10
NA
NC
4.8
1
5.9E-10
NA
NC
0.84
1
1.0E-10
NA
NC
Total ELCRorar
9.5E-08
Acetone
T richloroethene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J A170 000-179,99911715211171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 DenvationVDust MomtoringlArea 51171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (Lifetime)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14A
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADEEinh-dust
HQinh-dust —
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
A^^inh-dust
AP nc
Ml =
^ ^Qinh-dust
RfC
COC
EPC(j us t
A^^inh-dust
RfC
HQinh-dust
EPC3
Subchronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
Acetone
3.0E-09
5.4E-11
8.0E-01
6.8E-11
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
7.4E-12
2.0E-03
3.7E-09
Acenaphthene
1 8E-07
3.2E-09
5.0E-01
6.4E-09
Acenaphthylene
1 4E-07
2.5E-09
5.0E-01
4.9E-09
Anthracene
4.3E-07
7.7E-09
5.0E-01
1.5E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
1.9E-08
5.0E-01
3.8E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9. IE-07
1.6E-08
5.0E-01
3.3E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
2.0E-08
5.0E-01
4. IE-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
4.6E-09
5.0E-01
9. IE-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
9.6E-09
5.0E-01
1.9E-08
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
2.6E-09
7.0E-03
3.7E-07
Chrysene
9.9E-07
1.8E-08
5.0E-01
3.5E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
1.2E-09
5.0E-01
2.4E-09
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
2.8E-09
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2. IE-06
3.7E-08
5.0E-01
7.5E-08
Fluorene
2.4E-07
4.2E-09
5.0E-01
8.5E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
4.8E-09
5.0E-01
9.5E-09
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
9.2E-10
3.0E-03
3. IE-07
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
2.5E-08
5.0E-01
4.9E-08
Pyrene
1.5E-06
2.7E-08
5.0E-01
5.4E-08
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
1.4E-06
5.0E-01
2.8E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
4.1E-08
2.0E-05
2.0E-03
Arsenic
1.4E-04
2.5E-06
2.0E-05
1.3E-01
Barium
1.3E-05
2.4E-07
5.0E-03
4.7E-05
Cadmium
2.4E-07
4.2E-09
2.0E-05
2. IE-04
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
8.6E-08
3.0E-04
2.9E-04
Lead
3.7E-04
6.7E-06
1.0E-03
6.7E-03
Mercury
1. IE-06
2.0E-08
3.0E-04
6.5E-05
Selenium
7.1E-07
1.3E-08
3.0E-03
4.2E-06
Silver
1.3E-07
2.2E-09
1.4E-04
1.6E-05
Ulmh-dust
1.4E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,000-179,99911715211171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 DenvatiorADust MonitoringlArea 5117152110 Risk (Residenl)Fug Dust (1<2)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 4
4/15/2015
TABLE 1-14A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dus , * EF * ED * EP * C2
^ ^Qinh-dust
^ L ' t inh-dust
HO . , =
ADEjnh^ust
AP nc
RfC
COC
EPCdust
ADEj n h^just
RfC
HQjnh-dust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
Acetone
3.0E-09
2.0E-10
8.0E-01
2.5E-10
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
2.7E-11
2.0E-03
1.4E-08
Acenaphthene
1.8E-07
1.2E-08
5.0E-01
2.4E-08
Acenaphthylene
1.4E-07
9.0E-09
5.0E-01
1.8E-08
Anthracene
4.3E-07
2.8E-08
5.0E-01
5.6E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
7.0E-08
5.0E-01
1.4E-07
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.1E-07
6.0E-08
5.0E-01
1.2E-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
7.5E-08
5.0E-01
1 t)t-U/
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
1.7E-08
5.0E-01
3.3E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
3.5E-08
5.0E-01
7.0E-08
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
9.6E-09
7.0E-03
1 4t-06
Chrysene
9.9E-07
6.5E-08
5.0E-01
1.3E-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
4.3E-09
5.0E-01
8.7E-09
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
1.0E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2.1E-06
1.4E-07
5.0E-01
2.7E-07
Fluorene
2.4E-07
1 6E-08
5.0E-01
3. IE-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
1.7E-08
5.0E-01
3.5E-08
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
3.4E-09
3.0E-03
1. IE-06
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
9.0E-08
5.0E-01
1.8E-07
Pyrene
1.5E-06
9.9E-08
5.0E-01
2.0E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
5.1E-06
5.0E-01
1.0E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
1.5E-07
2.0E-05
7.5E-03
Arsenic
1.4E-04
9.3E-06
2.0E-05
4.7E-01
Barium
1.3E-05
8.7E-07
5.0E-03
1.7E-04
Cadmium
2 4E-07
1.5E-08
2.0E-05
7.7E-04
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
3.2E-07
3.0E-04
1. IE-03
Lead
3.7E-04
2.4E-05
1.0E-03
2.4E-02
Mercury
1. IE-06
7.2E-08
3.0E-04
2.4E-04
Selenium
7.1E-07
4.7E-08
3.0E-03
1.6E-05
Silver
1.3E-07
8.2E-09
1.4E-04
5.9E-05
minh-dustj
5.0E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationtDust MonitoringtArea 5\17152110 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (7<8)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE I-14A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adult, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADEmh.tfyst
HQinh-dust “
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
^ ^Qinh-dust
AD^inh-dust
AP nc
Hlinh-dust
RfC
COC
EPCdust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
AD^inh-dust
(mg/m 3 )
RfC
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
^Qinh-dust
(unitless)
Acetone
3.0E-09
4.5E-10
8.0E-01
5.6E-10
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
6.2E-11
2.0E-03
3.1E-08
Acenaphthene
1 8E-07
2.7E-08
5.0E-01
5.3E-08
Acenaphthylene
1.4E-07
2.0E-08
5.0E-01
4. IE-08
Anthracene
4.3E-07
6.4E-08
5.0E-01
1.3E-07
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
1.6E-07
5.0E-01
3.2E-07
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.1E-07
1.3E-07
5.0E-01
2.7E-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
1.7E-07
5.0E-01
3.4E-07
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
3.8E-08
5.0E-01
7.5E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
7.9E-08
5.0E-01
1.6E-07
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
2.2E-08
7.0E-03
3. IE-06
Chrysene
9.9E-07
1.5E-07
5.0E-01
2.9E-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
9.8E-09
5.0E-01
2.0E-08
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
2.3E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2.1E-06
3.1E-07
5.0E-01
6.2E-07
Fluorene
2.4E-07
3.5E-08
5.0E-01
7.0E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
3.9E-08
5.0E-01
7.9E-08
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
7.6E-09
3.0E-03
2.5E-06
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
2.0E-07
5.0E-01
4. IE-07
Pyrene
1.5E-06
2.2E-07
5.0E-01
4.5E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
1.2E-05
5.0E-01
2.3E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
3.4E-07
2.0E-05
1.7E-02
Arsenic
1.4E-04
2.1E-05
2.0E-05
1.1E+00
Barium
1.3E-05
2.0E-06
5.0E-03
3.9E-04
Cadmium
2.4E-07
3.5E-08
2.0E-05
1.7E-03
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
7.1E-07
3.0E-04
2.4E-03
Lead
3.7E-04
5.5E-05
1.0E-03
5.5E-02
Mercury
1. IE-06
1.6E-07
3.0E-04
5.4E-04
Selenium
7. IE-07
1. IE-07
3.0E-03
3.5E-05
Silver
1.3E-07
1.9E-08
1 4E-04
1.3E-04
^^inh-dust*
1E+00
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL12015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MonitoringVArea 5\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (65)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14A (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
A-5 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521 10
Page 4 of 4
4/15/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6A for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4A for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
LAD^inh-<just
ELCRmh-dust —
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2 * C4
AP C
LADE, nh _dust * UR Total ELCR m h-dust =
2 ELCR mh _ dU st
COC
EF’Cdust
UADEj n h-dust
UR
ELCRj n h-dust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
(pg/m 3 )
(Mg/m 3 )" 1
(unitless)
Acetone
3 0E-09
3.2E-09
NA
NC
Trichloroethene
4.2E-10
4.4E-10
5.0E-06
2.2E-15
Acenaphthene
1.8E-07
1.9E-07
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
1.4E-07
1.5E-07
NA
NC
Anthracene
4.3E-07
4.6E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1. IE-06
1. IE-06
2.1E-04
2.4E-10
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.1E-07
9.6E-07
2.1E-03
2.0E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1. IE-06
1.2E-06
2.1E-04
2.5E-10
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
2.6E-07
2.7E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
5.4E-07
5.7E-07
2. IE-05
1.2E-11
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
1.5E-07
1.5E-07
1.3E-06
2.0E-13
Chrysene
9.9E-07
1.0E-06
2.1E-05
2.2E-11
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
6.6E-08
7.0E-08
2.1E-03
1.5E-10
Dibenzofuran
1.6E-07
1.7E-07
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
2.1E-06
2.2E-06
NA
NC
Fluorene
2.4E-07
2.5E-07
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
2.7E-07
2.8E-07
2.1E-04
5.9E-11
Naphthalene
5.2E-08
5.5E-08
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
1.4E-06
1.5E-06
NA
NC
Pyrene
1.5E-06
1.6E-06
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
7.8E-05
8.2E-05
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2.3E-06
2.4E-06
1.0E-04
2.4E-10
Arsenic
1 4E-04
1.5E-04
3.0E-03
4.5E-07
Barium
1.3E-05
1.4E-05
NA
NC
Cadmium
2.4E-07
2.5E-07
1.8E-03
4.5E-10
Chromium (total)
4.8E-06
5. IE-06
1.2E-02
6.IE-08
Lead
3.7E-04
3.9E-04
NA
NC
Mercury
1. IE-06
1.2E-06
NA
NC
Selenium
7.1E-07
7.5E-07
NA
NC
Silver
1.3E-07
1.3E-07
NA
NC
Total ELCR, nh _dust-
5.2E-07
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust MonitohngtArea 5\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (Lifetime)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
CES-2 AREA
TABLE I-2B File No. 171521 10
SUMMARY OF TOTAL HAZARD INDICES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 °' 1
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
CD
CD
>»
lO
CD
CO
CD
O)
CD
m
c
CD
■g
w
CD
3
TD
CD
TD
0
TO
"D
O
CD
O
m
0
o
c
CD
m
<
in
Q_
3
2
O)
CD
O)
CD
v_
CD
.c
*5
0
x
0
■o
c
CD
N
CD
X
>»
u
c
0
cn
c
o
O
. . T3
m 0
O 0
Z CD
13
-C
o
CD
CO
CO
CD
II
Q-
O
<
o
co
a:
i
=>
co
CO
LU
o
<
<
5
0.
9
File No 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
TABLE I-3B
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR SOIL SAMPLES (CES-2 Area)
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
Analytical Parameter'
All Soil 1 2
Background 5 * 7 8
■Z-Tl
Concentration for
Human Health Risk
Characterization 246
Frequency of
Detection 3
Range Detected 3
Median
Concentration 4
Arithmetic Mean
Concentration 4
Maximum Detected Concentration
Location
Depth
(feet)
Volatile Oraanic Compounds (VOCs)
Acetone
18 / 21
0.0044
-
0.48
0.040
0 083
GZ-302 6ft-10ft
6-10
NA
0.083
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
7 / 21
0.0100
-
0 022
0.0025
0.018
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
10-15
NA
0.018
Carbon disulfide
3 / 21
0.0025
-
0.011
0.0020
0 015
GZ-310 10ft-15ft
10-15
NA
0.015
Xylene, Total
1 / 21
0.075
0.0025
0.0067
BOR-12
0-3
NA
0.0067
Semi-Volatile Oraanic Compounds (SVOCs)
Dibenzofuran
1 / 22
8.9
0 53
0 97
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
NA
0.97
Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons (EPH)
C9-C18 Aliphatics
1 / 3
313
7.0
109
S-26
0-0.5
NA
313
C19-C36 Aliphatics
3 / 3
117
-
1790
137
681
S-26
0-0.5
NA
1790
C11-C22 Aromatics
2 / 3
208
-
456
208
224
S-26
0-0.5
NA
456
Total Petroleum Hvdrocarbons (TPH)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
12 / 21
71
-
2410
85
295
GZ-304 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
NA
295
Polvchlorinated Biphenvls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1254
1 / 21
0.34
0.079
0.095
B215
5-7
NA
NCC
Aroclor 1260
1 / 21
0.20
0.079
0.088
B215
5-7
NA
NCC
Aroclor 1221
2 / 20
0.35
-
0.35
0.079
0 11
GZ-307 10ft-15ft
10-15
NA
NCC
Total PCBs
3 / 21
0.66
-
1.1
0.079
0 20
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
10-15
NA
0.20
Metals. Total
Antimony
1 / 2
2.9
2.0
2.0
S-26
0-0.5
1
2.9
Arsenic
49 / 49
3.7
-
14800
408
1532
GZ-310 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
20
1532
Barium
25 / 25
6 8
-
740
60
149
GZ-303 10ft-15ft
10-15
50
149
* Beryllium
2 / 2
0.26
-
0 40
0.33
0,33
S-26
0-0.5
0.4
0.33
Cadmium
6 / 25
2.9
-
130
5.5
20
GZ-306 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
2
20
Chromium
25 / 25
7.6
-
76
18
22
S-26
0-0.5
30
22
* Copper
1 / 1
30
30
30
B215
5-7
40
30
Lead
42 / 42
9.8
-
13300
256
1437
GZ-310 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
100
1437
Mercury
24 / 25
0.13
-
205
1.1
17
GZ-310 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
0.3
17
Nickel
2 / 2
16
-
61
39
39
S-26
0-0.5
20
61
Selenium
5 / 25
9.7
•
279
5.6
24
GZ-309 10ft-15ft
10-15
0.5
24
Silver
8 / 25
1.4
-
21
1.1
3.7
GZ-308 10ft-15ft
10-15
0.6
3.7
Vanadium
2 / 2
39
-
44
42
42
S-26
0-0.5
30.0
44
Zinc
2 / 2
430
530
480
480
S-26
0-0.5
100.0
530
Other
Cyanide, total
1 / 1
0.23
0.23
0.23
B215
5-7
NA
0.23
Analvtes Reported with Multiple Methods A
Acenaphthene
1 / 25
4.4
0 53
0.82
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
0.5
0.82
Acenaphthylene
1 / 25
11
0.53
1.1
GZ-309 6ft-10ft
6-10
0.5
1.1
Anthracene
2 / 25
1.6
-
23
0.53
1.6
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
1
1.6
Benzo(a)anthracene
3 / 25
1.4
-
42
0.53
2.8
GZ-309 6ft-10ft
6-10
2
2.8
Benzo(a)pyrene
4 / 25
0.71
-
22
0.28
1.6
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
2
1.6
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
3 / 25
1.2
-
20
0.53
1.7
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
2
1.7
Benzo(ghi)perylene
2 / 25
2.6
-
3.3
0.53
0 86
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
1
0.86
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
2 / 25
7.9
-
27
0.53
2.0
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
1
2.0
Chrysene
4 / 25
0.80
-
32
0.28
2.2
GZ-309 6ft-10ft
6-10
2
2.2
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
2 / 25
1.8
-
3.0
0.28
0.59
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
0.5
0.59
Fluoranthene
6 / 25
1.1
-
91
0.55
5.1
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
4
5.1
Fluorene
1 / 25
14
0.53
1.2
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
1
1.2
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
2 / 25
3.3
-
4.4
0.53
0.93
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
1
0.93
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
1 / 25
7.5
0.53
0.95
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
0.5
0.95
Naphthalene
8 / 25
0.0048
-
7.7
0.0031
0.56
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
0.5
0 56
Phenanthrene
3 / 25
1.7
-
107
0.53
5.1
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
3
5-1
Pyrene
4 / 25
1.9
_
61
0.53
3.6
GZ-309 6ft-1 Oft
6-10
4
36 I
Notes:
1. Only detected analytes are listed.
2 All data collected within the top 15 feet soil from the CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area are included in the statistics.
3 These statistics only include analytical results for constituents detected above the laboratory reporting limit (RL).
4. These statistics include all detected constituent concentrations and one-half the RL for constituents not detected above the RL.
5 Background concentration from MassDEP, 2002. Technical Update: Background Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Metals in Soil. May.
Values for natural soil were used. * indicates the maximum detected concentration is below the MassDEP-identified background concentration.
6 EPCs for human health risk characterization were based on the arithmetic means of all soil samples collected within the top 15 feet soil from the CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area.
The maximum detected concentrations were used as the EPCs for the three EPH fractions, antimony, beryllium, nickel, vanasium, and zinc as a conservative approach due to the relatively limited sample size.
7. Total polychlorinated biphenyl was calculated as sum of all arodors analyzed.
8. Concentrations reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
A These analytes were analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected concentration is listed to represent the sample result.
If the analyte was not detected via any analytical method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the non-detected sample result.
NCC = Not a Constitute of Concern; EPC = Exposure Point Concentration; EPH = Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon.
JA170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerrvationVSoil Data HighlighttSoil Summary_High As
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE I-4B
SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No
EPC1
EPC3
Arithmetic
Estimated
COC
Mean
Concentration
Concentration
in Fugitive
in Soil - CES-2Area 5 a
Dust b
(mg/kg)
(mg/m 3 )
2-Butanone
0.018
1.36E-09
Acetone
0.083
6.26E-09
Carbon Disulfide
0.015
1.09E-09
Xylene (Total)
0.0067
4.99E-10
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.95
7.1 IE-08
Acenaphthene
0.82
6.18E-08
Acenaphthylene
1.1
8 08E-08
Anthracene
1.6
1.21E-07
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.8
2.12E-07
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.6
1.22E-07
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.7
1.26E-07
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.86
6 46E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2.0
1 52E-07
Chrysene
2.2
1.62E-07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.59
4.45E-08
Dibenzofuran
0.97
7.25E-08
Fluoranthene
5.1
3.79E-07
Fluorene
1.2
8.98E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.93
7.01 E-08
Naphthalene
0.56
4.20E-08
Phenanthrene
5.1
3.81 E-07
Pyrene
3.6
2.73E-07
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
456
3.42E-05
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1790
1.34E-04
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
313
2.35E-05
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
295
2.21 E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
0.20
1.51 E-08
Antimony
2.9
2.18E-07
Arsenic
1532
1.15E-04
Barium
149
1.12E-05
Beryllium
0.33
2.48E-08
Cadmium
20
1.51E-06
Chromium (total)
22
1.65E-06
Copper
30
2.23E-06
Cyanide
0.23
1.73E-08
Lead
1437
1.08E-04
Mercury
17
1.28E-06
Nickel
61
4.58E-06
Selenium
24
1.81E-06
Silver
3.7
2.75E-07
Vanadium
44
3.30E-06
Zinc
530
3.98E-05
Notes:
a. The soil exposure point concentration is based on the arithmetic mean concentration from all soil samples obtained from within the CES-
2 Area Proposed Remediation Area.
The maximum detected concentrations were used as the EPCs for the three EPH fractions, antimony, beryllium, nickel, vanasium, and
zinc as a conservative approach due to the relatively limited sample size.
Although the maximum detected concentrations of beryllium and copper were within the MassDEP (2002) established background; all
detected analytes were included as COCs in the risk evaluation.
b The soil-bome fugitive dust exposure point concentrations were estimated from the soil exposure point concentration according to the
following equation:
EPC du5t = EPCso.i * PM 10 * Cl
EPC dus i
Exposure Point Concentration in Fugitive Dust (mg/m 3 )
Calculated
EPCsoii
Exposure Point Concentration in Soil (mg/kg)
Calculated
PMio
Respirable Particle Concentration - Commercial/Industrial Workers and Residents (mg/m 3 ;
0.075
Cl
Unit Conversion Factor (kg/mg)
IE-06
Abbreviations:
COC = constituent of concern; EPH = extractable petroleum hydrocarbon.
. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monitonng\High As Area\171521 10 Exp Con\EPC
QA: CL Dale 4/15/15
o in in
Z: o o
S - a
£ ® £
a
LU
_j
LL.
O
a:
CL
LU
QC
Z
CO
o
D.
X
LU
DC
O
o
a
!u b
m °
< ^
t— <
DC
to £
0 0 0
E >- =
£ g> o
"8 S’ «j
§5-”
SS
CO
D
□
Z
<
o
O'
LU
2
o
o
co
8
<
CM
CO
LU
O
D
a
I
0
0
O
a
CO
o
0
o>
ro
l_
0
>
<
0
E
"O
c
0
Q
Q
<
0
(0
o
Q
0
Q
0
o>
0
c
0
>
<
0
0
3
O
0
O
o
i
</)
Z>
0
C
o
0
0
_3
0
>
O
O
&
co
Q.
0
O
0
CZ
c
o
0
3
O'
LU
C
o
0
3
O'
LU
o
o
0
vj i— u-
9 ™ £
0
3
O'
LU
0
C
0
0
*-»
C
o
L_
0
0
o
0
>
0
3
Q
O
3
0
o
a
x
LU
>s
l
CO
0.
3
W
o
Q.
X
LU
LU
0C
o
0-
LU
CO
o
2
LU
CZ
$
o
0.
LU
0.
<
CD
0
Cg
0
0
c
o
0
CZ
0
0
>>
0
0
CD
8
O
O
8
O
Q
0
a
E
2
?
8
9
8
Q
8
<
3
a:
u_
0
a
O
0
a
0
<
s
CL¬
UJ
0
o
0
0
0
0'
o
c
0
;g
‘3
O
co
o
o
cm
CL
LU
Q
0
0
0
0
-C
5
8
C
0
•O
8
O
0
“O
0
0
31
_ _ _ 0 Q)
LU LU 0 O D
CO •'3'
c c
■$<
2 .2
0
0 0
H
3 3
0
O' O'
0
■o -o
0 0
CD
"3 3 LU
o o
0 0
O O
CD
<
r^-
o
>% >
0 0 _
- 0*0 0 )
1 1
O) o> -X
^ .x
"B) c
E E
>»
0
5
O)
E
o
CO
c
<1) o
0 SP
o 0
° E
l§
O o
0 O
O)
- c
o
0
O)
0
0
L_
0
>
<
0 a)
> *♦=
< -I
3
0
o
Q.
X
LU
O
CO
-o
O
L—
0
Q.
O
0
O'
1 —
CL
0
-C
■O
0
0
o
l—
Q.
»>—-v
-X
0
0
CL
0
X
0
•O
3
O
o
CM
0.
LU
Q
0
0
0
10
CD
CD
CL
LU
O
0
0
0
C
o
3
a
o
0
o'
CL
•o
0
E
3
0
0
<
0
0
>
0
>%
0
-o
LO
CD
CO
0
0
>>
L_ O
0 r*-
s. ®
£ E
0 0
TO
CD
O
tO
CD
CO
LU 0
_J *
CD
<
O
CM
CL CL
LU LU
Q
0
0
0
0
O)
0
1 —
0
>
0
(/) jf)
0 0
3 3
O' O'
0 0
CD
O
CM
lO
O
O
0
Q.
0 CD
C 9
Q) LU
0
C
o
O
CD
O
CO
CD **>
IO"
CM
l—
0
c
0
0
0
>
5
0
CD
0 0
2
0
0
0
>N
0
E
O)
>% >
0 0
c
0
>
0
0
>
0
■0
‘c
3
CD
-0 ~o
0
0
DC
c
D- £
2? 8
O)
c
>%
o
c
0
3
O'
0
c
o
0 .2
3
O
0 0 0
O
m c
•2 2
5 £
q. a
O
0
-Q
<
8
Ills
3
0
o
CL
X
LU
3
0
O
Q.
X
LU
0
>
3
0
Q. —
>< £
lu ac
o
CL
8
0
cz
§ 3
t o'
L_ V_
0 0
CL CL
O) CD
C C
O) CD
0 0
0 0
CD < <
JC
O)
0
5
■O
o
8
CZ
LL a OL
LU LU LU
> c 0
T- $ 0. Q.
O CD < <
o
0
_Q
0
0
■o
0
3
O
8
O
0
c
0
0
0
C
O
c
0
0
O
0
>
■4—>
0
3
■O
3
0
o
CL
X
0,
0
2
c
o
0
0
O)
c
0
3
TO
*o
0
>
*c
0
•O
0
0
E
x
1—
c
E
x
CD
E
O)
E^
0
L—
o
o
c
o
'0
L—
0
>
c
o
o
c
3
CD
o
o
o
o
o
II
o
0
Is
0 "O
C O)
3 E
0 ^
Is
0 ^
0 0
cz g
3
o
Q
LU
c
o
3
o
l—
o
o
2
3
o
CL
LU
Q
0
0
0
O
1
O
0
.a
0
O
x
Q
LU
X
cz
>
x
o
i
CL
X
CM
II
O
0
c
0
0
0
C
o
0
0
O
0
>
0
■4-^
0
o:
c
o
0
0
O)
c
o
CO
DC
>
CD
3.
d
0 .iz
0 o
CD tz
c 0
Z to
0 05
3
a
o
0
1
10
CD
CD
C
o
tr —
0
X
0
c
E
10
1 ^-
0
o <
3
T3
S 0
l|
O
c o
E 16
o c
O 0
<D
o
o
<
o
a)
1
£
©
E
I
cu
Q.
CL
LU
Q
q:
o
m
Abbreviation:
MassDEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
o o
CM <N O
>n ® >"
r a> ^
t <o
0.
m
u?
LU
_l
CD
<
HI
LL
O
cc
CL
UJ
DC
3
C/)
O
CL
X
LU
DC
O
o
Q
h-
3
O
_i
<
a.
w
Z>
o
z
ri
<
o
a.
LU
o
o
(TJ
to
•O
w
CO (/)
E g *
E >
$ <?o
.9 TO
O) to
— CO
03
E
_ CO
o W
9- » -
o « c
i is 2
_ > Q)
S hi >
2? LU
<
CM
•
CO
UJ
o
UJ
a
J
2?
3
CO
O
Q.
X
LU
CD
Q
0
o>
03
L_
<D
>
<
d)
E
■o
c
03
LU
Q
<
3
CO
o
Q.
X
LU
03
Q
CD
O)
03
k_
<D
<
CD
■4-^
TO
3
TO
O
o
■*-<
~o
<D
(/)
3
co
c
o
TO
3
cr
LU
CO
3
a
0)
>
O)
3
LL
a>
c
L—
o
n
i
o
c/)
**-
o
c
o
'■3
TO
TO
>
<
5
x
h
<
0.
LU
cr
D
CO
O
CL
X
UJ
co
CD
_3
>
O
Q. Y
CO A
o
Cl
CD
O
<D
cr
CNI
o
*
0-
LU
«
Q
UJ
LU
O
CL
LU
£
Ql
<
CO
O
*
CNI
O
«
0.
UJ
¥
a
UJ
UJ
o
CL
LU
3
■o
Ul
Q
uJ
Q
0
0
15
V,
3
V)
<
3
E
TO
L_
uf
uJ
Q
3
"D
O
TO
Q
<
CL
CL
<
UJ
TO
0
>
To
>%
TO
■o
un
CD
CO
TO
0
>%
»_ o
to
>> a>
1 E
TO <D
-D
CO
CD
CO
0
O)
TO
CO CD
LU LU
l-i- > ■Q -4-.
UJ * TO C C
Q "aj £ JS iS
mo 3 <o <o
<2 "ql « c c
ro ^ (n o O
2 I- < O O
CL £
UJ to
JO JO
TO TO
3 3
cr cr
0 0
CD
2 « w
3 3 |
O O rr
TO TO
O O
t °
g ^ lO I o
o co ■ ^ o
CNJ O O -
o T_
o
CO to
oo
to"
CNJ
IO
CD
TO
c
CO
c
o
c
o
JO
CO
E
n
E
co
E
0
>»
To
0
>
0
CO
l_
TO
3
O
sz
CD
E
CO
X
CO
TO
3
cr
UJ
TO
3
cr
LU
cz
Z)
O)
E
O)
3.
O)
E
c
0
>
0
To
L_
3
O
0
To
X
TO
*D
o>
3.
TO
•o
TO
■o
0
3
Q
0
>
6)
3
3
CO
a -s
0
X
LU
TO
o
3
CO
o
Q.
X d)
UJ o)
>> s
« ®
o S
o S
c cr
2? ^ <U
Q CL
o
CL
aj .y
I ? 3
3 C CT
i_ O
.O C
c
Q
<
0
0
0
0
o
0
O)
0
i_
3
l_
3
i_
3
i_
3
TO
E
co
CO
CO
CO
c
o
o
O
o
0
0
CL
CL
CL
CL
0
>
X
X
>T
X
o
<
Zj
UJ
LU
UJ
UJ
8
■g i 5 E’ E'
^ o o c c
TO TO 0 0
- ^ CL CL
C C
O O
(/) (/)__
»- i_ O) O)
0 0 TO TO
C C
8 8
O) O)
c c
0 0
> >
< <
LL O Q_ CNJ CO Q_ CL
LU LU UJ O O < <
O
CL
UJ
0
75
3
o
TO
O
CO
O
CL
UJ
O
CO
"D
0
"5.
CL
TO
CO
i
co
E
O)
E
io
r^-
o
X O
ST Q-
^ Q)
c >
o
0
"O
o
TO
0 "o
O a;
co
3
0 £
O ~
*-P TO
I 3-
0
0 t_
m °
*
CL 0
CO
0 0
*“ 0
< CO
<
c
o
o
0
■4—>
s
CL
TO
C
0
E
c
o
L_
>
c
LU
c
0
E
tr
TO
CL
0
a
CO
3
8
3
-C
o
TO
C0
CO
TO
II
CL
d UJ
o q
CO
TO ^
> ^
0 ^
$
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MonitoringVHigh As Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)\Parameters QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Exposure Pathway: Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
ONI/)
-i
o
o
5
<
0)
E
O
Q
<
*S o ^
I
Q
Q
<
g
5
i s
I t
z a
O 2
^ o
§ O
§. "§>
cl 2
LU £ .
O - -o
3 c o
t/> Q. £
I « a
i I §
v>
.c .x o
r Q) a
CJ </> ■*
c >. ®
TO 03 ©
p T3 *£
o Ifi (D
O • * CM ^
o in .. in
to o> ® o>
c o> S o>
- © Q - - 0-
j=: ^ a)
Q £>
$ g
a> Q
O O to O 2 a 2
CD
t
< £ LU
Z CD —I
S- CD
CT <<
m r*-
CD
t
CD
t
<
Z
■f 9
O) CD
-X .X
t !
« P
& I
O To
- <r
i I
< □ UJ W Lii
2 Q
Q Q
Q <
< _1
8
a
Q. ..
UJ \t
2
Q
UJ
a.
UJ
Q
2 O
t 9
2 'g a. 2
(0 .2 ‘r U
JS
<
a & I
E <o
® E
SE
O) - 1 -
§ e
0) 0)
£ 3
E g
£ a.
c X
5 UJ
Q) <
'1 Q-
£ UJ
$5 to
E D
0) -
*•“ ©
© to
£ 2
s Si g Si s
« Q -t « w
$
CD
co <r
? Z
CO <<
2 Z
8 o
CL CL
< <
E .E
x 2
.E o)
E a>
2
o
o
o 9.
to CM O
o <\i m
UJ
Q
f € E E
’SO)©®
X X X
3 a> © ©
£ £ £
Q
UJ
cr
>
3 in m in
rz ifi ^
© 2
JA170.000-179.9991171521II71521 -O0.DEL12015 PM10 DenvationOust MonlonnglHigh As Atea\171521 10 Risk (Residenl)Parameters QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Equations Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure (ADE) and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure (LADE)
o ntn
■*
o
o
_ T3 °
C O ©
Q. •£ P
< 8 -5
§ * w ®
TO © Q. W
c I ® p
8 ®
£ co ®
O -o > 0)
o -f —
= 10 « -s
CO
LO
CM
•£ T3
O) ®
E ®£
s I-i
uj -a
Q ®
CM
<
CL
-O W ^ UJ
O CD o CO
E IE q. ID
E 2 iS w «
TV
o
in
in
d
<
z
CD
T
CQ
<
<
z
2
x:
O
in
c
o
<
Z
CD
UJ
—I
CD
<
CD
d
in
d
<
Z
m
c
B
(X
=3
cr
UJ
O
1
*
5
CM
o
0.
UJ
M
I
I
UJ
o
<
1
1
s'
5
E %
- s
UJ «
o o
< ^
I 1
U. O
£ £
I I
X X
UJ UJ
O
UJ
i 2 a s
c i v
^ o
~ 1 ? o o
CD S T» T»
© ,w
£ £
a
x
UJ
0.
<
O
CL
UJ
O
CL
|
o
CD "O
I 2
® o
0 »
B CD
If
0) «_
5 £
CO _
-- X
Cl ©
CO +~
© ©
c co
< w
<
o uj
© c/5
i =>
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust Montonng\High As Area\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Parameters QA: CL Date 4/15/15
O t- If)
Q.
c
Z
^ a
C *- T-
E 2
e
cr
<
z
CO CO — Q °
9: O « £ . fc
— "t; m rv W *•—
£■
1
2
K t T) 7Z ±z
O E <D _£> 3 0)
5
E
3 CL £*
= V, -o Cfl
O
o
o
cd a> — a. <
« 3 c >
c Q CL ® 2 '
o W IJJ 3 O
filsMi
■o o) E >
i; .s w u c ir
£ x n *=:
05
Z
o
J:\170,000-178.999\17152ni71521-00 DEL12015 PM10 DerlvationlDust Monitonng\Hlgh As Area\17152110 Chem lnfo\DRNCO QA: CL Dale: 4/15/15
o t- m
in
5
5
Z
o
K
5
<
X
o
LU
UJ
o
z
UJ
o
o
z
o
tr
<
2 o
® Z
3 i
m O
< i-
t- <
s
£
o
E > l
S.
! w 5
'll
i > ®
LU >
? CM
O
>
tr
<
5
5
D
03
T3 t:
3 ®
CO 5
3 T5
a a;
c t
o uj
E? |
£o
2 .2 ^
p «y
r 5 (T
8f
I "
£°{
ll
o
O
11 § I a
S£ S
ill 2-6.
— U3 K P
8
O
| 8
® mm
-O — .=
1 §■
| 8
-- ?
c c
o o
ts
c
2
W
>*
■O c
E 2
® to
11
in £
1?
II
<L> <D
.C .b
Cl CO
S
O
E
a>
&
>. £
E
|
i/>
£
co 03
z z
CL o
o
0) (D ■•■* ** •■' CO O)
u)iotomioioio»oiou)in
ooooooooooo
doooooooooo
O 5 Q.Q) 0 )<UJDCD(D
CN (Nl ^
0)0)000
o o o o
iig8§ eSese9 "
o ° ° ° <=
o o
TJ'O.O.C — —
— — — — -a ■- — a>
0)Q-'0‘0‘0X3'0‘0 ro . X3 0T3_'‘0‘0‘0‘0‘0
coN-tftoiAioinifliniriioininin
oooooooooooooo
m m m o m m «n
CN CM (M n
o m o o g
o o o o 2
o o o o 2
«!> - 2 - <2 ^ -
.2
13
*- a>
-c c ®
£ © ^ 0)
3 3 c.
g 5 ® fft §
sIll§ § I
< O X CM < < <
Q t ■
c a> c
© c ©
3 a> .c
# c f c
c 2 a> 2
® o cl o
^ 3 2.
<L .c u^
‘9 2" 6 2 c o o
2 S 13
i. fr CD
8
oO
© S .2
* « * 8
s ££ ® S
<<522
3 f
2 ©
T3 c
>* a.
i m
1 *
2
< d
o o o o o
N N N N N
C C C C C
£ C C
f | 2
odd
_ o
if if £ z al <T u
C E c jb c
o O © q. -
«L§
_ O .
« >» -5
§ .52 E I § 1
: 11 ^ §
< < m
« r O > m
o a o o -j
Jsi.
S Z 0) 03
E
2
1
4 a S
O
h-
<
tr
03
CL
o
5
o
o
T?
CL
UJ
CO
o
LU
o
in
I
o
co
o
JC
E
<
E
©
CL
E
UJ
o
8
£
O
CL
. >%
*> 8
O ®
CN 0
0)
•c E
< T3
03 m
— <0
£ o
s a
o ™
°>5
a. S
» o
* W
I °
s 8
“■ £
g O
E £
£ »
a £ ■»
“"I
j J;
| E f
o E —
I
tr o
: £
r I
£
>*
f
O
o
O
o
1
<
LO
5
= E
CO <u
^ *
o
8
O 2
8 i
ii
^ 9 t =
£ e
y s
a: S
13
| 8
° o
3 I-
«/) <
a o
a> ~
i ™
I §
a: o
2
O
I
X
CL
<
X
0.
g
I
CL
>
£ 2
< o
*5 €
m 3
® O
I i.
t X
3 E
?!
X
E
o.
D
J £
co co
•3 ^
x ■*=
o a
•“ 5
9
5 .
'i:
E 9
E in
UJ *£-
Q O
8s
? e g
t _< UJ •
O 3 o — <D -r-
® 0. O ®
■CSSS
: 8£|S
O o
11 . CO O
E <
Q.
JZ ~ <s>
r- M (0 j,
3 a> co ZZ
O < < UJ
>0. Q. Q
o UJ ID £
2 D D I
a> 0.
5 uj
f Q
6 i 8 ! £
«-> *n =: iu
O
tr
i | 5
11 •=
o < S
ri ® I
° 5
lo.
Z- UJ
2 g
UJ in
03
3
> ® 3 C C.
3
?
8
! O O
' E ^
c
8
8
c
o
O
9
tr
o
o
o
E
a>
f
S « ri O c s ^
> H ■? > <
03
Z
0.
e
0)
i
S O
© "
a ^
n Z
< O
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
Orin
£ « 5
o
LU
LU
o
o
o
>-
K
<
5
w
5 %
co |
11
CO 5
03 S
6 w
-z ~
» ' c jo £
” 3 tr -B)
ll
CO 5
°3^i
2 E EE
UJ UJ UJ
r\i r\i c\i
in m ro
UJ UJ UJ
co ro CM
UJ UJ UJ
It co CM
CM t- 1
s
E
«5 o -3 «
o
8
y- O r-
9 ? 9
LU LU UJ
cm cm o
9 9?
UJ UJ UJ
CO CO fO
r-~
D n CMCMCM n CMCMCM non N nnr ,
OmmmOcDcQcQOOOmOOCi
* o -* -o
o >, .a £
7^2=00
0) W
O b
c «2 c
11 §
^ f -e
o o
CM < O
= | «
® a S
o «5 r:
tit
« £ S'
II §
X CM <
tt) _C
2T £
^ 6
4) O Q. O
9 ^ 9
u- it 2 "5. -c
° ° ^ I m
'■5 ‘X3 O X CQ
E T3
Q-U.ru.
S “ -5 -g fi Or-"
(OJOOOOOOS
C^NNNNNjL
a>t=cccccL
If
±= <0
5^03-0
commmmooQiLii£zii
E
o
<e
CM
ss
2 T^-
£ o
a -c S> £
*5 2
Q; Z O
il l 1
c2ra«)ioro>^«
<<mmoooo-iS
Jr > c
a) — ro.E
CO CO > N
O —
E
CO o
<o
£• »
o >.
s? ff
4> -O
co ^
o *1
to c
(0 o
•O ™
4) X
CO LL.
IS
C/3
4)
•O ||
s >
(o S
59
lx
« >
c X
3 u-
IS
X .9
< 4)
U
It
M> CD
4)
£ c
CO c
— 4>
a >
O C
■O 3 g
O S' 43
43 <6
W £ M
a
g>«
•B O
3 =1
| g
a: v
<0 C o
8. fe J
o £ -g
W w -=
™ To ®
43 2 -
o c
5 -o
<6 43 £
O £ -
43 43
CO a
c x
£ 5
<2 * =
I o S
o ^ >,
- | E
X S3
% |
— 03 ■
o
11 >
i;u
-SmS
«3 LL.
S £ w
a 2 "4-
3 O® 3T
O 43 O
(0 c N
«- — Q.
o < uj
>Q.Q
€ m 8
J= CO n
2 D 5
c
£ o
CO > O
_ E 3 €
CD 3 ‘C
“111
■e “ 3 S
; “ c i
° C I 2
C (0 ® £
o c CD .
! 5 »
g S ■£• J .
5 S-S*
ll
E .E
£ £
- £■
£• “
o c
43
E C®
M3 3
43 S
I ID li 0) J M3 «J Z ^
43 CD w
03 O O
1 ° 8
£ 8 £
r ^ C tj
•
o> = S s
O CD >
.E E 43 c
o 3 -o 43
CO -C 43 o
° « ; E £
c ra .£ 3
; 5 j w
| 2 ^ <Ni
X Q. CD CD
< CD
li
& 2
TABLE MOB
RELATIVE ABSORPTION FACTORS
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
COC
Exposure Pathways
Carcinogen
Oral Soil
Non-Carcinogen
2-Butanone
1 a
Acetone
1 a
Carbon Disulfide
1 b
Xylene (Total)
1 a
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.3 a
Acenaphthene
0.3 a
Acenaphthylene
0.3 a
Anthracene
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.3 a
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Chrysene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
0.3 a
Fluorene
0.3 a
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.28 a
0.28 a
Naphthalene
0.3 a
Phenanthrene
0.3 a
Pyrene
0.3 a
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
0.3 a
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1 a
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
1 a
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
0.3 f
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1 a
1 a
Antimony
1 a
Arsenic
0.5 a
0.5 a
Barium
1 a
Beryllium
1 a
Cadmium
1 a
Chromium (total)
1 a
Copper
0.7 b
Cyanide
1 a
Lead
0.3 c
Mercury
0.5 a
Nickel
1 a
Selenium
1 a
Silver
1 a
Vanadium
1 a
Zinc
1 a
Notes:
a. MassDEP 2014 ShortForm (v0414.xlsx).
b. RAF calculated from Table B-11 Default Absorption Efficencies presented in
MassDEP Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization (1995).
c. USEPA 2007. User’s Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK) Windows.
f. Value for Cl 1-C22 aromatic hydrocarbons used for total petreleum
hydrocarbon (TPH).
Notes:
1. A blank space indicates no data found.
2. Where data are lacking, a default value of 1 is used in subsequent risk calcul;
Abbreviations.
COC = Constituent of Concern; FtAF = Relative Absorption Factors.
J \ 170 , 000-179 999\171521\171521-O0 DELV2015PM10 DerivationVDust Momtoring\High As Area\171521.10 Chem IrrfoVRAF
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-1 IB
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
^Qsoil-oral
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC soil * IR S0 „ * EF * ED * EP * RAF ora , nc * Cl
BW * AP nc
ADD soi ,^ ra , |_| | _
RfD
HQ S0l |_ 0ra |
COC
EPC soi i
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora i_ nc
(unitless)
ADD S0 j|_ 0ra |
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
SubChronic
(mg/kg-day)
HQsoil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.018
i
1.2E-10
6.0E-01
2.0E-10
Acetone
0.083
i
5.6E-10
2.7E+00
2. IE-10
Carbon Disulfide
0.015
i
9.8E-11
1.0E-01
9.8E-10
Xylene (Total)
0.0067
i
4.5E-11
4.0E-01
1.IE-10
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.95
0.3
1.9E-09
4.0E-03
4.8E-07
Acenaphthene
0.82
0.3
1.7E-09
2.0E-01
8.3E-09
Acenaphthylene
1.1
0.3
2.2E-09
3.0E-01
7.3E-09
Anthracene
1.6
0.3
3.3E-09
1.0E+00
3.3E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.8
0.3
5.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.9E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.6
0.3
3.3E-09
3.0E-01
1.1E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.7
0.3
3.4E-09
3.0E-01
1. IE-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.86
0.3
1.7E-09
3.0E-01
5.8E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2.0
0.3
4.1E-09
3.0E-01
1.4E-08
Chrysene
2.2
0.3
4.4E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.59
0.3
1.2E-09
3.0E-01
4 0E-09
Dibenzofuran
0.97
1
6.5E-09
4.0E-03
1.6E-06
Fluoranthene
5.1
0.3
1.0E-08
4.0E-01
2.6E-08
Fluorene
1.2
0.3
2.4E-09
4.0E-01
6.0E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.93
0.28
1.8E-09
3.0E-01
5.9E-09
Naphthalene
0.56
0.3
1.1E-09
2.0E-01
5.7E-09
Phenanthrene
5.1
0.3
1.0E-08
3.0E-01
3.4E-08
Pyrene
3.6
0.3
7.4E-09
3.0E-01
2.5E-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
456
0.3
9.2E-07
3.0E-01
3. IE-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1790
1
1.2E-05
6.0E+00
2.0E-06
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
313
1
2.1E-06
1.0E+00
2. IE-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
295
0.3
5.9E-07
3.0E-01
2.0E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
0.20
1
1.4E-09
5.0E-05
2.7E-05
Antimony
2.9
1
2.0E-08
4.0E-04
4.9E-05
Arsenic
1532
0.5
5.2E-06
3.0E-04
1.7E-02
Barium
149
1
1 0E-06
7.0E-02
1.4E-05
Beryllium
0
1
2.2E-09
5.0E-03
4.4E-07
Cadmium
20
1
1.4E-07
1.0E-03
1.4E-04
Chromium (total)
22
1
1.5E-07
2.0E-02
7.4E-06
Copper
30
0.7
1.4E-07
3.7E-02
3.8E-06
Cyanide
0
1
1.5E-09
6.0E-03
2.6E-07
Lead
1437
0.3
2.9E-06
7.5E-04
3.9E-03
Mercury
17
0.5
5.7E-08
3.0E-04
1.9E-04
Nickel
61
1
4. IE-07
2.0E-02
2. IE-05
Selenium
24
1
1.6E-07
5.0E-03
3.3E-05
Silver
4
1
2.5E-08
5.0E-03
4.9E-06
Vanadium
44
1
3.0E-07
9.0E-03
3.3E-05
Zinc
530
1
3.6E-06
3.0E-01
1.2E-05
m soil-oral —
2.2E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170,000-179999\171521\171521-00DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation'.Dust Monitormg\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Soil Ingest (Non-Cancer)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-1 IB (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 2
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
LAD Dgoii-orai —
ELCR so j|-oral —
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPCsoii * IRsoil * EF * ED * EP * RAF orak; * Cl
BW * AP C
LADD sol |_ orat * CSF Total ELCR soi |_o ra i =
^ ELCR S oil-oral
COC
EPC soil
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora |_ c
(unitless)
L-ADD S0 j|-oral
(mg/kg-day)
CSF
(mg/kg-day)' 1
ELCR S oil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.018
i
8.70E-13
NA
NC
Acetone
0.083
i
4.02E-12
NA
NC
Carbon Disulfide
0.015
i
7.01E-13
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
0.0067
i
3.20E-13
NA
NC
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.95
i
4.56E-11
NA
NC
Acenaphthene
0.82
i
3.96E-11
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
1.1
i
5.18E-11
NA
NC
Anthracene
1.6
i
7.78E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.8
0.3
4.08E-11
7.3E-01
3.0E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.6
0.3
2.35E-11
7.3E+00
1.7E-10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.7
0.3
2.43E-11
7.3E-01
1.8E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.86
1
4.14E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2.0
0.3
2.92E-11
7.3E-02
2.1E-12
Chrysene
2.2
0.3
3.1 IE-11
7.3E-02
2.3E-12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.59
0.3
8.56E-12
7.3E+00
6.2E-11
Dibenzofuran
0.97
1
4.65E-11
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
5.1
1
2.43E-10
NA
NC
Fluorene
1.2
1
5.76E-11
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.93
0.28
1.26E-11
7.3E-01
9.2E-12
Naphthalene
0.56
1
2.69E-11
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
5.1
1
2.45E-10
NA
NC
Pyrene
3.6
1
1.75E-10
NA
NC
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
456
1
2.19E-08
NA
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1790
1
8.61 E-08
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
313
1
1.51 E-08
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
295
1
1.42E-08
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
0.20
1
9.65E-12
2.0E+00
1.9E-11
Antimony
2.9
1
1.39E-10
NA
NC
Arsenic
1532
0.5
3.68E-08
1.5E+00
5.5E-08
Barium
149
1
7.17E-09
NA
NC
Beryllium
0
1
1.59E-11
NA
NC
Cadmium
20
1
9.70E-10
NA
NC
Chromium (total)
22
1
1.06E-09
NA
NC
Copper
30
1
1.43E-09
NA
NC
Cyanide
0
1
1.1 IE-11
NA
NC
Lead
1437
1
6.91 E-08
NA
NC
Mercury
17
1
8.18E-10
NA
NC
Nickel
61
1
2.93E-09
NA
NC
Selenium
24
1
1.16E-09
NA
NC
Silver
4
1
1.76E-10
NA
NC
Vanadium
44
1
2.12E-09
NA
NC
Zinc
530
1
2.55E-08
NA
NC
Total ELCRso,i-or a i
|1 5.6E-08
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust Monitoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Soil Ingest (Cancer)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/17/2015
TABLE 1-12B
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale. See TABLE I-4B for Exposure
Point Concentration Derivation
Inhalation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
2 HQ dust
''‘-'‘-dust
HO i i -
ADE dust
AP nc
HI, , =
RfC
COC
EPCdust
ADE dust
RfC
HQ dus t
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
1.4E-09
2.6E-10
5.0E+00
5.2E-11
Acetone
6.3E-09
1.2E-09
8.0E-01
1.5E-09
Carbon Disulfide
1. IE-09
2.IE-10
7.0E-01
3.0E-10
Xylene (Total)
5.0E-10
9.5E-11
4.0E-01
2.4E-10
2-Methyl naphthalene
7.1E-08
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.7E-08
Acenaphthene
6.2E-08
1.2E-08
5.0E-01
2.4E-08
Acenaphthylene
8. IE-08
1.5E-08
5.0E-01
3. IE-08
Anthracene
1.2E-07
2.3E-08
5.0E-01
4.6E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2. IE-07
4.0E-08
5.0E-01
8 IE-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.2E-07
2.3E-08
5.0E-01
4.7E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.3E-07
2.4E-08
5.0E-01
4.8E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
6.5E-08
1.2E-08
5.0E-01
2.5E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.5E-07
2.9E-08
5.0E-01
5.8E-08
Chrysene
1.6E-07
3.1E-08
5.0E-01
6.2E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
4 4E-08
8.5E-09
5.0E-01
1.7E-08
Dibenzofuran
7.2E-08
1.4E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
3.8E-07
7.2E-08
5.0E-01
1.4E-07
Fluorene
9.0E-08
1.7E-08
5.0E-01
3.4E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.0E-08
1.3E-08
5.0E-01
2.7E-08
Naphthalene
4.2E-08
8.0E-09
3.0E-03
2.7E-06
Phenanthrene
3.8E-07
7.3E-08
5.0E-01
1.5E-07
Pyrene
2.7E-07
5.2E-08
5.0E-01
1 0E-07
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
3.4E-05
6.5E-06
5.0E-01
1.3E-05
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1.3E-04
2.6E-05
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
2.3E-05
4.5E-06
6.0E-01
7.5E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2.2E-05
4.2E-06
5.0E-01
8.4E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1.5E-08
2.9E-09
2.0E-05
1.4E-04
Antimony
2.2E-07
4. IE-08
1.0E-02
4. IE-06
Arsenic
1. IE-04
2.2E-05
2.0E-05
1.1E+00
Barium
1. IE-05
2.1E-06
5.0E-03
4.3E-04
Beryllium
2.5E-08
4.7E-09
2.0E-05
2.4E-04
Cadmium
1.5E-06
2.9E-07
2.0E-05
1.4E-02
Chromium (total)
1.6E-06
3.1E-07
3.0E-04
1.0E-03
Copper
2.2E-06
4.2E-07
3.0E-03
1.4E-04
Cyanide
1.7E-08
3.3E-09
3.0E-03
1. IE-06
Lead
1. IE-04
2.1E-05
1.0E-03
2. IE-02
Mercury
1.3E-06
2.4E-07
3.0E-04
8. IE-04
Nickel
4.6E-06
8.7E-07
1.0E-03
8.7E-04
Selenium
1.8E-06
3.5E-07
3.0E-03
1 2E-04
Silver
2.7E-07
5.2E-08
1.4E-04
3.7E-04
Vanadium
3.3E-06
6.3E-07
1.0E-03
6.3E-04
Zinc
4.0E-05
7.6E-06
1.4E-03
5.4E-03
Hldustf
1E+00
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust MonitoringVHigh As Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parametersJFugitive Dust (Non-Cancer)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
File No 171521 10
Page 2 of 2
4/17/2015
TABLE 1-12B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale and TABLE I-4B for Exposure
Point Concentration Derivation
Inhalation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2 *C3
LADt dust
AP C
ELCR dust = LADE dust * UR Total ELCR dus , =
S ELCR dust
COC
EPC dust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
LADE dus t
(Mg/m 3 )
UR
(pg/m 3 )' 1
ELCR dgst
(unitless)
2-Butanone
1.4E-09
1.8E-09
NA
NC
Acetone
6.3E-09
8.5E-09
NA
NC
Carbon Disulfide
1. IE-09
1.5E-09
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
5.0E-10
6.8E-10
NA
NC
2-Methyl naphthalene
7.1E-08
9.7E-08
NA
NC
Acenaphthene
6 2E-08
8.4E-08
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
8.1E-08
1. IE-07
NA
NC
Anthracene
1.2E-07
1.7E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.1E-07
2.9E-07
2.1E-04
6.0E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.2E-07
1.7E-07
2. IE-03
3.5b-1U
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.3E-07
1.7E-07
2.1E-04
3.6E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
6.5E-08
8.8E-08
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.5E-07
2.1E-07
2.1E-05
4.3E-12
Chrysene
1.6E-07
2.2E-07
2.1E-05
4 6E-12
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
4.4E-08
6.1E-08
2. IE-03
1.3E-10
Dibenzofuran
7.2E-08
9.9E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
3.8E-07
5.2E-07
NA
NC
Fluorene
9.0E-08
1.2E-07
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.0E-08
9.5E-08
2.1E-04
2.0E-11
Naphthalene
4.2E-08
5.7E-08
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
3.8E-07
5.2E-07
NA
NC
Pyrene
2.7E-07
3.7E-07
NA
NC
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
3.4E-05
4.7E-05
NA
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1.3E-04
1.8E-04
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
2.3E-05
3.2E-05
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2.2E-05
3.0E-05
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1.5E-08
2.0E-08
1.0E-04
2 OE-12
Antimony
Arsenic
2.2E-07
1. IE-04
3.0E-07
1.6E-04
NA
3.0E-03
NC
4.7E-07
Barium
1. IE-05
1.5E-05
NA
NC
Beryllium
Cadmium
2.5E-08
1.5E-06
3.4E-08
2. IE-06
2.4E-03
1 8E-03
8. IE-11
3.7E-09
Chromium (total)
1.6E-06
2.2E-06
1.2E-02
2.7E-08
Copper
2.2E-06
3.0E-06
NA
NC
Cyanide
Lead
1.7E-08
1. IE-04
2.3E-08
1.5E-04
NA
NA
NC
NC
Mercury
Nickel
1.3E-06
4 6E-06
1.7E-06
6.2E-06
NA
4.8E-04
NC
3.0E-09
Selenium
1.8E-06
2.5E-06
NA
NC
Silver
2.7E-07
3.7E-07
NA
NC
Vanadium
3.3E-06
4.5E-06
NA
NC
4.0E-05
54E-05
NA
NC
Total ELCR dust :| 5.0E-07
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
V170.000-179,999\171521\171521-00 I
DEU2015 PM 10 DenvationlDust Monitoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Fug,tive Dust (Cancer)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13B
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
Exposure to Dust
* dd - Ep C S0 ,| *
soil-oral
ur\ _ ADD so j|_ ora |
RfD
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IR SO ii * EF * ED * EP * RAF oral nc * Cl
BW * AP nc
X HQ S0 j|_ 0ra |
COC
EPC soi ,
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora |-nc
(unitless)
ADD S0 j|_ 0ra i
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Subchronic
(mg/kg-day)
^^soil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.018
1
2.0E-11
6.0E-01
3.3E-11
Acetone
0.083
1
9.0E-11
2.7E+00
3.3E-11
Carbon Disulfide
0.015
1
1.6E-11
1.0E-01
1.6E-10
Xylene (Total)
0.0067
1
7.2E-12
4.0E-01
1.8E-11
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.95
0.3
3.IE-10
4.0E-03
7.7E-08
Acenaphthene
0.82
0.3
2.7E-10
2.0E-01
1.3E-09
Acenaphthylene
1.1
0.3
3.5E-10
3.0E-01
1.2E-09
Anthracene
1.6
0.3
5.2E-10
1.0E+00
5.2E-10
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.8
0.3
9.2E-10
3.0E-01
3.1E-09
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.6
0.3
5.3E-10
3.0E-01
1.8E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.7
0.3
5.5E-10
3.0E-01
1.8E-09
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.86
0.3
2.8E-10
3.0E-01
9.3E-10
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2.0
0.3
6.6E-10
3.0E-01
2.2E-09
Chrysene
2.2
0.3
7.0E-10
3.0E-01
2.3E-09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.59
0.3
1.9E-10
3.0E-01
6.4E-10
Dibenzofuran
0.97
1
1.0E-09
4.0E-03
2.6E-07
Fluoranthene
5.1
0.3
1.6E-09
4.0E-01
4.1E-09
Fluorene
1.2
0.3
3.9E-10
4.0E-01
9.7E-10
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.93
0.28
2.8E-10
3.0E-01
9.4E-10
Naphthalene
0.56
0.3
1.8E-10
2.0E-01
9. IE-10
Phenanthrene
5.1
0.3
1.6E-09
3.0E-01
5.5E-09
Pyrene
3.6
0.3
1.2E-09
3.0E-01
3.9E-09
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
456
0.3
1.5E-07
3.0E-01
4.9E-07
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1790
1
1.9E-06
6.0E+00
3.2E-07
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
313
1
3.4E-07
1.0E+00
3.4E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
295
0.3
9.6E-08
3.0E-01
3.2E-07
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
0.20
1
2.2E-10
5.0E-05
4.3E-06
Antimony
2.9
1
3. IE-09
4.0E-04
7.8E-06
Arsenic
1532
0.5
8.3E-07
3.0E-04
2 8E-03
Barium
149
1
1.6E-07
7.0E-02
2.3E-06
Beryllium
0.33
1
3.6E-10
5.0E-03
7. IE-08
Cadmium
20
1
2.2E-08
1.0E-03
2.2E-05
Chromium (total)
22
1
2.4E-08
2.0E-02
1.2E-06
Copper
30
0.7
2.3E-08
3.7E-02
6. IE-07
Cyanide
0.23
1
2.5E-10
6.0E-03
4. IE-08
Lead
1437
0.3
4.7E-07
7.5E-04
6.2E-04
Mercury
17
0.5
9.2E-09
3.0E-04
3. IE-05
Nickel
61
1
6.6E-08
2.0E-02
3.3E-06
Selenium
24
1
2.6E-08
5.0E-03
5.2E-06
Silver
3.7
1
4.0E-09
5.0E-03
7.9E-07
Vanadium
44
1
4.8E-08
9.0E-03
5.3E-06
Zinc
530
1
5.7E-07
3.0E-01
1.9E-06
Hl 0 ral =
| 3.5E-03
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dusl MomtoringVHigh As Area\171521.10 Risk (Residenf)Soil Ingest (1<2)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 4
4/17/2015
TABLE 1-13B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD S0l)K)ra i -
HQsoil-oral “
Exposure to Dust
EPC soil *
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IR S01| * EF * ED * EP * RAF
oral-nc * Cl
S HQ so ,i_ ora i
ADDsod.orai
BW * AP nc
RUoil-oral —
RfD
EPCsoii
RAF ora i_ nc
A D D soil-oral
RfD
RQsoil-oral
EPC1
SubChronic
(mg/kg)
(unitlessl
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
/unit! ess)
0.018
1
8.4E-11
6.0E-01
1.4E-10
0.083
1
3.9E-10
2.7E+00
1 4E-10
0.015
1
6.7E-11
1.0E-01
6.7E-10
0.0067
1
3. IE-11
4.0E-01
7.7E-11
0.95
0.3
1.3E-09
4.0E-03
3.3E-07
0.82
0.3
1. IE-09
2.0E-01
5.7E-09
1.1
0.3
1.5E-09
3.0E-01
5 0E-09
1.6
0.3
2.2E-09
1.0E+00
2.2E-09
2.8
0.3
3.9E-09
3.0E-01
1.3E-08
1.6
0.3
2.3E-09
3.0E-01
7.5E-09
1.7
0.3
2.3E-09
3.0E-01
7.8E-09
0.86
0.3
1.2E-09
3.0E-01
4 0E-09
2.0
0.3
2.8E-09
3.0E-01
9.3E-09
2.2
0.3
3.0E-09
3.0E-01
1.0E-08
0.59
0.3
8.2E-10
3.0E-01
2.7E-09
0.97
1
4.5E-09
4.0E-03
1.1E-06
5.1
0.3
7.0E-09
4.0E-01
1.8E-08
1.2
0.3
1.7E-09
4.0E-01
4. IE-09
0.93
0.28
1.2E-09
3.0E-01
4.0E-09
0.56
0.3
7.7E-10
2.0E-01
3.9E-09
5.1
0.3
7.0E-09
3.0E-01
2.3E-08
3.6
0.3
5.0E-09
3.0E-01
1.7E-08
456
0.3
6.3E-07
3.0E-01
2. IE-06
1790
1
8.3E-06
6.0E+00
1.4E-06
313
1
1.4E-06
1.0E+00
1.4E-06
295
0.3
4. IE-07
3.0E-01
1.4E-06
0.20
1
9.3E-10
5.0E-05
1.9E-05
2.9
1
1.3E-08
4.0E-04
3.3E-05
1532
0.5
3.5E-06
3.0E-04
1.2E-02
149
1
6.9E-07
7.0E-02
9.8E-06
0.33
1
1.5E-09
5.0E-03
3.0E-07
20
1
9.3E-08
1.0E-03
9.3E-05
22
1
1.0E-07
2.0E-02
5. IE-06
30
0.7
9.7E-08
3.7E-02
2.6E-06
0.23
1
1. IE-09
6.0E-03
1.8E-07
1437
0.3
2.0E-06
7.5E-04
2.7E-03
17
0.5
3.9E-08
3.0E-04
1.3E-04
61
1
2.8E-07
2.0E-02
1.4E-05
24
1
1. IE-07
5.0E-03
2.2E-05
3 7
1
1.7E-08
5.0E-03
3.4E-06
44
1
2.0E-07
9.0E-03
2.3E-05
530
1
2.4E-06
3.0E-01
8.2E-06
^0131 —
II 1.5E-02
COC
2-Butanone
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Xylene (Total)
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
Notes:
1 Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00
DEL12015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monitoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (7<8)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adult, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD soj |_o ra | -
HQsoil-oral “
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC soii * IR soj | * EF * ED * EP * RAF
BW * AP nc
ADD SO j|o ra |
RfD
* Pi
aral-nc ^ 1
^soil-oral “
^ HQ S0 ||_ 0ra i
COC
EPCsoii
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora |_ nc
(unitless)
ADD SO j|_o ra i
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
SubChronic
(mg/kg-day)
HQsoil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.018
i
1.6E-10
6.0E-01
2.6E-10
Acetone
0.083
i
7.2E-10
2.7E+00
2.7E-10
Carbon Disulfide
0.015
i
1.3E-10
1.0E-01
1.3E-09
Xylene (Total)
0.0067
i
5.7E-11
4.0E-01
1.4E-10
2-Methylnaphthalene
0.95
0.3
2.5E-09
4.0E-03
6. IE-07
Acenaphthene
0.82
0.3
2. IE-09
2.0E-01
1. IE-08
Acenaphthylene
1.1
0.3
2.8E-09
3.0E-01
9.3E-09
Anthracene
1.6
0.3
4.2E-09
1.0E+00
4.2E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.8
0.3
7.3E-09
3.0E-01
2.4E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.6
0.3
4.2E-09
3.0E-01
1.4E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.7
0.3
4.4E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.86
0.3
2.2E-09
3.0E-01
7.4E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
2.0
0.3
5.2E-09
3.0E-01
1.7E-08
Chrysene
2.2
0.3
5.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.9E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.59
0.3
1.5E-09
3.0E-01
5. IE-09
Dibenzofuran
0.97
1
8.3E-09
4.0E-03
2. IE-06
Fluoranthene
5.1
0.3
1.3E-08
4.0E-01
3.3E-08
Fluorene
1.2
0.3
3. IE-09
4.0E-01
7.8E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.93
0.28
2.3E-09
3.0E-01
7.5E-09
Naphthalene
0.56
0.3
1.5E-09
2.0E-01
7.3E-09
Phenanthrene
5.1
0.3
1.3E-08
3.0E-01
4.4E-08
Pyrene
3.6
0.3
9.4E-09
3.0E-01
3. IE-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
456
0.3
1.2E-06
3.0E-01
3.9E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1790
1
1.5E-05
6.0E+00
2.6E-06
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
313
1
2.7E-06
1.0E+00
2.7E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
295
0.3
7.6E-07
3.0E-01
2.5E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
0.20
1
1.7E-09
5.0E-05
3.5E-05
Antimony
2.9
1
2.5E-08
4.0E-04
6.3E-05
Arsenic
1532
0.5
6.6E-06
3.0E-04
2.2E-02
Barium
149
1
1.3E-06
7.0E-02
1.8E-05
Beryllium
0.33
1
2.9E-09
5.0E-03
5.7E-07
Cadmium
20
1
1.7E-07
1.0E-03
1.7E-04
Chromium (total)
22
1
1.9E-07
2.0E-02
9.5E-06
Copper
30
0.7
1.8E-07
3.7E-02
4.9E-06
Cyanide
0.23
1
2.0E-09
6.0E-03
3.3E-07
Lead
1437
0.3
3.7E-06
7.5E-04
5.0E-03
Mercury
17
0.5
7.4E-08
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
Nickel
61
1
5.3E-07
2.0E-02
2.6E-05
Selenium
24
1
2.1E-07
5.0E-03
4.2E-05
Silver
3.7
1
3.2E-08
5.0E-03
6.3E-06
Vanadium
44
1
3.8E-07
9.0E-03
4.2E-05
Zinc
530
1
4.6E-06
3.0E-01
1.5E-05
floral ~
2.8E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521V171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dust Monitoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (65)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 4 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
r
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
COC
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
LADD S0 |i_o ra i =
ELCR
soil-oral '
EPC S01|
EPC1
(mg/kg)
EPC S oi| IRsoil
* EF * ED * EP *
RAF oral ^ * Cl
2 ELCR so ,i_ ora i
LADD soi |_ ora i * CSF
BW * AP C
Total ELCRgoji^jrai —
RAForai.c
LADD SO j|_o ra i
CSF
ELCR SO ii_ ra i
(unitless)
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)' 1
(unitless)
1
1.IE-12
NA
NC
1
5.2E-12
NA
NC
1
9.0E-13
NA
NC
1
4.IE-13
NA
NC
1
5.9E-11
NA
NC
1
5.IE-11
NA
NC
1
6.6E-11
NA
NC
1
1.0E-10
NA
NC
0.3
5.2E-11
7.3E-01
3.82E-11
0.3
3.0E-11
7.3E+00
2.20E-10
0.3
3.1E-11
7.3E-01
2.27E-11
1
5.3E-11
NA
NC
0.3
3.7E-11
7.3E-02
2.74E-12
0.3
4.0E-11
7.3E-02
2.91E-12
0.3
1.IE-11
7.3E+00
8.02E-11
1
6.0E-11
NA
NC
1
3.IE-10
NA
NC
1
7.4E-11
NA
NC
0.28
1.6E-11
7.3E-01
1.18E-11
1
3.5E-11
NA
NC
1
3.1E-10
NA
NC
1
2.2E-10
NA
NC
1
2.8E-08
NA
NC
1
1. IE-07
NA
NC
1
1.9E-08
NA
NC
1
1.8E-08
NA
NC
1
1.2E-11
2.0E+00
2.48E-11
1
1.8E-10
NA
NC
0.5
4.7E-08
1.5E+00
7.09E-08
1
9.2E-09
NA
NC
1
2.0E-11
NA
NC
1
1.2E-09
NA
NC
1
1.4E-09
NA
NC
1
1.8E-09
NA
NC
1
1.4E-11
NA
NC
1
8.9E-08
NA
NC
1
1. IE-09
NA
NC
1
3.8E-09
NA
NC
1
1.5E-09
NA
NC
1
2.3E-10
NA
NC
1
2.7E-09
NA
NC
1
3.3E-08
NA
NC
Total ELCR ora i
7.IE-08
2-Butanone
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Xylene (Total)
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
0.018
0.083
0.015
0.0067
0.95
0.82
1.1
1.6
2.8
1.6
1.7
0.86
2.0
2.2
0.59
0.97
5.1
1.2
0.93
0.56
5.1
3.6
456
1790
313
295
0.20
2.9
1532
149
0.33
20
22
30
0.23
1437
17
61
24
3.7
44
530
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
\170,000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015
PM10 DerivationtDust Momtoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (Lifetime)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14B
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
AHF -
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
^ ^Qinh-dust
ML -' t inh-dust
ADE| n h d US t
AP nc
RfC
COC
EPCdust
ADEj n h.<j US t
RfC
HQinh-dust
EPC3
Subchronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
1.4E-09
2.4E-11
5.0E+00
4.8E-12
Acetone
6.3E-09
1.IE-10
8.0E-01
1.4E-10
Carbon Disulfide
1. IE-09
2.0E-11
7.0E-01
2.8E-11
Xylene (Total)
5.0E-10
8.9E-12
4.0E-01
2.2E-11
2-Methylnaphthalene
7.1E-08
1.3E-09
5.0E-01
2.5E-09
Acenaphthene
6.2E-08
1. IE-09
5.0E-01
2.2E-09
Acenaphthylene
8. IE-08
1.4E-09
5.0E-01
2.9E-09
Anthracene
1.2E-07
2.2E-09
5.0E-01
4.3E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2. IE-07
3.8E-09
5.0E-01
7.6E-09
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.2E-07
2.2E-09
5.0E-01
4.4E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.3E-07
2.3E-09
5.0E-01
4.5E-09
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
6.5E-08
1.2E-09
5.0E-01
2.3E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.5E-07
2.7E-09
5.0E-01
5.4E-09
Chrysene
1.6E-07
2.9E-09
5.0E-01
5.8E-09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
4.4E-08
7.9E-10
5.0E-01
1.6E-09
Dibenzofuran
7.2E-08
1.3E-09
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
3.8E-07
6.8E-09
5.0E-01
1.4E-08
Fluorene
9.0E-08
1.6E-09
5.0E-01
3 2E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.0E-08
1.3E-09
5.0E-01
2.5E-09
Naphthalene
4.2E-08
7.5E-10
3.0E-03
2.5E-07
Phenanthrene
3.8E-07
6.8E-09
5.0E-01
1.4E-08
Pyrene
2.7E-07
4.9E-09
5.0E-01
9.8E-09
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
3.4E-05
6.1E-07
5.0E-01
1.2E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1.3E-04
2.4E-06
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
2.3E-05
4.2E-07
6.0E-01
7.0E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2.2E-05
3.9E-07
5.0E-01
7.9E-07
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1.5E-08
2.7E-10
2.0E-05
1.3E-05
Antimony
2.2E-07
3.9E-09
1.0E-02
3.9E-07
Arsenic
1. IE-04
2. IE-06
2.0E-05
1.0E-01
Barium
1. IE-05
2.0E-07
5.0E-03
4.0E-05
Beryllium
2.5E-08
4.4E-10
2.0E-05
2.2E-05
Cadmium
1.5E-06
2.7E-08
2.0E-05
1.4E-03
Chromium (total)
1.6E-06
2.9E-08
3.0E-04
9.8E-05
Copper
2.2E-06
4.0E-08
3.0E-03
1.3E-05
Cyanide
1.7E-08
3.IE-10
3.0E-03
1.0E-07
Lead
1.IE-04
1.9E-06
1.0E-03
1.9E-03
Mercury
1.3E-06
2.3E-08
3.0E-04
7.6E-05
Nickel
4.6E-06
8.2E-08
1.0E-03
8.2E-05
Selenium
1.8E-06
3.2E-08
3.0E-03
1. IE-05
Silver
2.7E-07
4.9E-09
1.4E-04
3.5E-05
Vanadium
3.3E-06
5.9E-08
1.0E-03
5.9E-05
Zinc
4.0E-05
7.1E-07
1.4E-03
5. IE-04
mjnh-dust|f
1.IE-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust Monitoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (1<2)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE M4B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 2 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
^‘-'^inh-dust
HO . , . -
ADE, nh ^j US t
AP nc
^ HQjnh-dust
RfC
^P^dust
ADEjnh.dust
RfC
^Qinh-dust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
1.4E-09
8.9E-11
5.0E+00
1.8E-11
6.3E-09
4.IE-10
8.0E-01
5.IE-10
1. IE-09
7.2E-11
7.0E-01
1.0E-10
5.0E-10
3.3E-11
4.0E-01
8.2E-11
7.1E-08
4.7E-09
5.0E-01
9.3E-09
6.2E-08
4.0E-09
5.0E-01
8 IE-09
8.1E-08
5.3E-09
5.0E-01
1. IE-08
1.2E-07
7.9E-09
5.0E-01
1.6E-08
2. IE-07
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.8E-08
1.2E-07
8.0E-09
5.0E-01
1.6E-08
1.3E-07
8.3E-09
5.0E-01
1.7E-08
6.5E-08
4.2E-09
5.0E-01
8 5E-09
1.5E-07
9.9E-09
5.0E-01
2.0E-08
1 6E-07
1. IE-08
5.0E-01
2. IE-08
4 4E-08
2.9E-09
5.0E-01
5.8E-09
7.2E-08
4.7E-09
NA
NC
3.8E-07
2.5E-08
5.0E-01
5.0E-08
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
COC
2-Butanone
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Xylene (Total)
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
9.0E-08
7.0E-08
4.2E-08
3.8E-07
2.7E-07
3.4E-05
1.3E-04
2.3E-05
2.2E-05
1.5E-08
2.2E-07
1. IE-04
1. IE-05
2.5E-08
1.5E-06
1.6E-06
2.2E-06
1.7E-08
1. IE-04
1.3E-06
4.6E-06
1.8E-06
2.7E-07
3.3E-06
4.0E-05
5.9E-09
4.6E-09
2.7E-09
2.5E-08
1.8E-08
2.2E-06
8.8E-06
1.5E-06
1 4E-06
9.9E-10
1 4E-08
7.5E-06
7.3E-07
1 6E-09
9.9E-08
1. IE-07
1.5E-07
1. IE-09
7.1E-06
8.4E-08
3.0E-07
1.2E-07
1.8E-08
2.2E-07
2.6E-06
5.0E-01
5.0E-01
3.0E-03
5.0E-01
5.0E-01
5.0E-01
NA
6.0E-01
5.0E-01
2.0E-05
1.0E-02
2.0E-05
5.0E-03
2.0E-05
2.0E-05
3.0E-04
3.0E-03
3.0E-03
1.0E-03
3.0E-04
1.0E-03
3.0E-03
1 4E-04
1.0E-03
1 4E-03
1.2E-08
9.2E-09
9.2E-07
5.0E-08
3.6E-08
4.5E-06
NC
2.6E-06
2.9E-06
4.9E-05
1 4E-06
3.8E-01
1.5E-04
8. IE-05
5.0E-03
3.6E-04
4.9E-05
3.8E-07
7. IE-03
2.8E-04
3.0E-04
4.0E-05
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
1.9E-03
FHinh-dust-
3.9E-01
J
Notes.
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-OO DEL\2015 PM10
DenvatiomDust MonrtonngVHigh As Area\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (7<8)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE I-14B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adult, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
AD^inh-dust
HQinh-dust ”
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPCd US t * EF * ED * EP * C2
AF
A^^inh-dust
3 nc
^inh-dust “
^ ^Qinh-dust
RfC
COC
m
“0
o
CL
C
</>
^^^inh-dust
RfC
^Qinh-dust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
1 4E-09
2.0E-10
5.0E+00
4.0E-11
Acetone
6.3E-09
9.3E-10
8.0E-01
1.2E-09
Carbon Disulfide
1. IE-09
1.6E-10
7.0E-01
2.3E-10
Xylene (Total)
5.0E-10
7.4E-11
4.0E-01
1.8E-10
2-Methylnaphthalene
7. IE-08
1.IE-08
5.0E-01
2. IE-08
Acenaphthene
6.2E-08
9.1E-09
5.0E-01
1.8E-08
Acenaphthylene
8. IE-08
1.2E-08
5.0E-01
2.4E-08
Anthracene
1.2E-07
1.8E-08
5.0E-01
3.6E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2. IE-07
3.1E-08
5.0E-01
6.3E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1 2E-07
1.8E-08
5.0E-01
3.6E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.3E-07
1.9E-08
5.0E-01
3.7E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
6.5E-08
9.6E-09
5.0E-01
1.9E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.5E-07
2.2E-08
5.0E-01
4.5E-08
Chrysene
1.6E-07
2.4E-08
5.0E-01
4.8E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
4.4E-08
6.6E-09
5.0E-01
1.3E-08
Dibenzofuran
7.2E-08
1. IE-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
3.8E-07
5.6E-08
5.0E-01
1. IE-07
Fluorene
9.0E-08
1.3E-08
5.0E-01
2.7E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.0E-08
1.0E-08
5.0E-01
2. IE-08
Naphthalene
4.2E-08
6.2E-09
3.0E-03
2. IE-06
Phenanthrene
3.8E-07
5.6E-08
5.0E-01
1. IE-07
Pyrene
2.7E-07
4.0E-08
5.0E-01
8. IE-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
3.4E-05
5. IE-06
5.0E-01
1.0E-05
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1.3E-04
2.0E-05
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
2.3E-05
3.5E-06
6.0E-01
5.8E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2.2E-05
3.3E-06
5.0E-01
6.5E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1.5E-08
2.2E-09
2.0E-05
1. IE-04
Antimony
2.2E-07
3.2E-08
1 0E-02
3.2E-06
Arsenic
1. IE-04
1.7E-05
2.0E-05
8.5E-01
Barium
1. IE-05
1.7E-06
5.0E-03
3.3E-04
Beryllium
2.5E-08
3.7E-09
2.0E-05
1.8E-04
Cadmium
1.5E-06
2.2E-07
2.0E-05
1. IE-02
Chromium (total)
1.6E-06
2.4E-07
3.0E-04
8. IE-04
Copper
2.2E-06
3.3E-07
3.0E-03
1. IE-04
Cyanide
1.7E-08
2.5E-09
3.0E-03
8.5E-07
Lead
1. IE-04
1.6E-05
1.0E-03
1.6E-02
Mercury
1.3E-06
1.9E-07
3.0E-04
6.3E-04
Nickel
4.6E-06
6.8E-07
1.0E-03
6.8E-04
Selenium
1.8E-06
2.7E-07
3.0E-03
8.9E-05
Silver
2.7E-07
4.1E-08
1.4E-04
2.9E-04
Vanadium
3.3E-06
4.9E-07
1.0E-03
4.9E-04
Zinc
4.0E-05
5.9E-06
1 4E-03
4.2E-03
Hljnh-dust
8.8E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Momtoring\High As Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (65)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14B (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
CES-2 Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 4 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6B for Exposure Variables and
Rationale
See TABLE I-4B for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
LAD^inh-dust
ELCRjnh-dust —
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2 * C4
AP C
LADE, n h_dust UR Total ELCRj n h_dust =
2 ELCR, nh ^ us t
COC
E p C dust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
EADEj n h-(just
(Mg/m 3 )
UR
(Mg/m 3 )' 1
ELCR m h-dust
(unitless)
2-Butanone
1.4E-09
1.4E-09
NA
NC
Acetone
6.3E-09
6.6E-09
NA
NC
Carbon Disulfide
1. IE-09
1.2E-09
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
5.0E-10
5.3E-10
NA
NC
2-Methylnaphthalene
7.1E-08
7.5E-08
NA
NC
Acenaphthene
6.2E-08
6.5E-08
NA
NC
Acenaphthylene
8. IE-08
8.5E-08
NA
NC
Anthracene
1.2E-07
1.3E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
2.1E-07
2.2E-07
2.1E-04
4.7E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
1.2E-07
1.3E-07
2.1E-03
2.7E-10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.3E-07
1.3E-07
2.1E-04
2.8E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
6.5E-08
6.8E-08
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.5E-07
1.6E-07
2.1E-05
3.3E-12
Chrysene
1.6E-07
1.7E-07
2.1E-05
3.6E-12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
4.4E-08
4.7E-08
2. IE-03
9.8E-11
Dibenzofuran
7.2E-08
7.6E-08
NA
NC
Fluoranthene
3.8E-07
4.0E-07
NA
NC
Fluorene
9.0E-08
9.5E-08
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.0E-08
7.4E-08
2. IE-04
1.5E-11
Naphthalene
4.2E-08
4.4E-08
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
3.8E-07
4.0E-07
NA
NC
Pyrene
2.7E-07
2.9E-07
NA
NC
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
3.4E-05
3.6E-05
NA
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1.3E-04
1 4E-04
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
2.3E-05
2.5E-05
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2.2E-05
2.3E-05
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1.5E-08
1.6E-08
1.0E-04
1.6E-12
Antimony
2.2E-07
2.3E-07
NA
NC
Arsenic
1.1E-04
1.2E-04
3.0E-03
3.6E-07
Barium
1. IE-05
1.2E-05
NA
NC
Beryllium
2.5E-08
2.6E-08
2.4E-03
6.3E-11
Cadmium
1.5E-06
1.6E-06
1.8E-03
2.9E-09
Chromium (total)
1.6E-06
1.7E-06
1.2E-02
2. IE-08
Copper
2.2E-06
2.4E-06
NA
NC
Cyanide
1.7E-08
1.8E-08
NA
NC
Lead
1. IE-04
1. IE-04
NA
NC
Mercury
1.3E-06
1.3E-06
NA
NC
Nickel
4.6E-06
4.8E-06
4.8E-04
2.3E-09
Selenium
1.8E-06
1.9E-06
NA
NC
Silver
2.7E-07
2.9E-07
NA
NC
Vanadium
3.3E-06
3.5E-06
NA
NC
Zinc
4.0E-05
4.2E-05
NA
NC
Total ELCR m h-dust |
3.9E-07
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dust Monitoring\High As Area\171521 10 Risk (Residenl)Fug Dust (Lifetime)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
LOW PH AREA
m
in
o
TO
o
_J
O
<
O
J:\170.OO0-179.999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust MonitoringMow PH Area\171521.10 Risk Summary low pH\SUM_RISK
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
TABLE I-3C
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR SOIL SAMPLES (Low pH Area)
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett. Massachusetts
Analytical Parameter 1
All Soil 2
Background 5
Exposure Point
Concentration for
Human Health Risk
Characterization 2 4,6
Frequency of
Detection 3
Range Detected 3
Median
Concentration 4
Arithmetic Mean
Concentration 4
Maximum Detected
Concentration
Location
Depth
(feet)
Volatile Oruanic Compounds fVOCsI
Acetone
1 12
0.100
0.17
0.17
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0.100
Benzene
1 / 2
0.0020
0.013
0.013
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0.0020
Butanone, 2- (MEK)
1 12
0.025
0.13
0.13
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0025
Carbon disulfide
1 / 2
0.80
052
0.52
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0 80
Ethylbenzene
1 12
0 014
0.019
0.019
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0.014
Methylene Chloride
1 12
0.022
0.069
0.069
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0.022
Styrene
1 / 2
00020
0.013
0.013
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0 0020
Toluene
1 12
0.0030
0.019
0.019
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
0.0030
Xylene, Total
1 12
0.0020
0.013
0.013
CES-TP-4
5-8
NA
00020
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons tEPH)
C9-C18 Aliphatics
2 1 8
15
-
118
11
34
S-15
0-0.5
NA
34
C19-C36 Aliphatics
7 / 8
27
-
1670
107
358
S-19
0-0.5
NA
358
C11-C22 Aromatics
8 / 8
20
-
252
108
122
S-19
0-0.5
NA
122
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
3 / 3
30
-
360
280
223
CES-4
5-7
NA
360
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Aroclor 1248
1 / 3
3.9
0.070
1.3
C-21
8
NA
NCC
Aroclor 1262
1 / 3
0.33
0.070
0.15
C-21
8
NA
NCC
Total PCBs
2 / 3
0.38
-
4.1
0.38
1.5
C-21
8
NA
4.1
Metals. Total
Antimony
1 / 5
16
1.3
4.1
BOR-103
12
1
16
Arsenic
34 / 34
3.2
-
1050
52
191
TP301
5-10
20
191
Barium
11 / 11
16
-• j
650
33
115
C-22
6
50
115
Beryllium
5 / 5
0.23
-
0.49
0.26
0.30
BOR-103
12
0
0.49
Cadmium
2/11
0.14
-
2.1
0.23
0.40
C-22
6
2
040
Chromium
11 / 11
4.2
-
40
16
16
S-17
0-0.5
30
16
Copper
1 / 1
294
294
294
B217
6-9
40
294
Lead
26 / 27
14
-
24700
108
2181
C-22
6
100
2181
Mercury
5 / 11
0.090
-
65
0.22
8.1
C-21
8
0.3
8.1
Nickel
5 / 5
7.1
-
26
13
14
S-17
0-0.5
20
26
Selenium
3 / 11
29
-
110
4.4
22
C-22
6
0.5
22
Silver
3 / 11
2.4
-
18
0 35
2.4
C-22
6
0.6
2.4
Vanadium
5 / 5
19
-
35
23
26
S-17
0-0.5
30.0
35
Zinc
5 / 5
38
-
350
67
120
S-17
0-0.5
100.0
350
Other
Cyanide, total
1 / 1
0.27
0.27
0.27
B217
6-9
NA
0.27
Analytes Reported with Multiple MethodsA
Acenaphthene
1 / 9
1.0
0.27
0.43
BOR-103
9
0.5
0.43
Anthracene
3 / 9
040
-
1.8
0.38
0.58
BOR-103
9
1
0.58
Benzo(a)anthracene
3 / 9
1.7
-
2.1
0.38
0.89
C-21
8
2
0 89
* Benzo(a)pyrene
3 / 9
1.1
-
1.2
0.38
0.65
C-21
8
2
065
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
3 / 9
1.3
-
2.8
0.38
0.92
C-21
8
2
0.92
* Benzo(ghi)perylene
2 / 9
0.70
-
0.90
0.38
0.49
C-21
8
1
049
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
3 / 9
1.4
-
3.0
0.38
0.93
C-21
8
1
0.93
Chrysene
4 / 9
044
-
2.6
0.44
0.99
C-21
8
2
0.99
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
2 / 9
0.40
-
1.1
0.38
0.48
C-21
8
0.5
048
Fluoranthene
4 / 9
0.55
-
4.4
0.55
1.6
C-21
8
4
1.6
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
2 / 9
050
-
1.1
0.38
0.49
C-21
8
1
0.49
Naphthalene
1 / 9
0.60
0.35
0.38
C-21
8
0.5
0 38
Phenanthrene
3 / 9
1.8
-
3.4
0.38
1.1
C-21
8
3
1.1
* Pyrene
4 / 9
0.52
3.7
0.52
1.4
C-21
8
4
1.4
Notes:
1 Only detected analytes are listed
2 All data collected within the top 15 feet soil from the Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area are included in the statistics.
3. These statistics only include analytical results for constituents detected above the laboratory reporting limit (RL).
4 These statistics include all detected constituent concentrations and one-half the RL for constituents not detected above the RL.
5 Background concentration from MassDEP, 2002. Technical Update: Background Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Metals in Soil. May.
Values for natural soil were used * indicates the maximum detected concentration is below the MassDEP-identified background concentration.
6 EPCs for human health risk characterization were based on the arithmetic means of all soil samples collected within the top 15 feet soil from the Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area.
For all VOCs, TPH, PCBs, antimony, beryllium, nickel, vanadium, and zinc, the maximum detected concentrations were used as the EPCs as a conservative approach due to the relatively small
sample size.
7. Total polychlorinated biphenyl was calculated as sum of all the aroclors analyzed.
8. Concentrations reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
A These analytes were analyzed by multiple analytical methods. If the analyte was detected via at least one method, the maximum detected concentration is listed to represent the sample result.
If the analyte was not detected via any analytical method, the minimum RL is listed as the RL for the non-detected sample result.
NCC = Not a Constitute of Concern: EPC = Exposure Point Concentration.
VOC = Volatile Organic Compound; TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon; PCB = Polychlorinated Biphenyl
J:\170.000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVSoil Data HighlighhSoil Summary_Low pH
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
TABLE I-4C
SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
r
EPC1 EPC3
COC
Arithmetic Estimated
Mean Concentration
Concentration in Fugitive
in Soil 3 Dust 6
(mg/kg) (mg/m 3 )
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (Total)
Styrene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
lndeno( 1 ,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
0.025 3.75E-09
0.100 1.50E-08
0.0020 3.00E-10
0.80 1.20E-07
0.014 2.10E-09
0.022 3.30E-09
0.0030 4.50E-10
0.0020 3.00E-10
0.0020 3.00E-10
0,43 6.48E-08
0.58 8.73E-08
0.89 1.34E-07
0.65 9.73E-08
0.92 1.37E-07
0.49 7.31 E-08
0.93 1.39E-07
0.99 1.48E-07
0.48 7.14E-08
1.6 2.43E-07
0 49 7.31 E-08
0.38 5.73E-08
1.1 1.62E-07
1.4 2.1 IE-07
122 1.83E-05
358 5.37E-05
34 5.07E-06
360 5.40E-05
4 1 6.08E-07
16 2.36E-06
191 2.86E-05
115 1.73E-05
0 49 7.35E-08
0.40 6.06E-08
16 2.44E-06
294 4 41E-05
0.27 4.05E-08
2181 3.27E-04
8.1 1.21E-06
26 3.90E-06
22 3.28E-06
2.4 3.67E-07
35 5.25E-06
350 5.25E-05
a. The soil exposure point concentration is based on the arithmetic mean concentration from all soil samples obtained from within the Low
pH Area Proposed Remediation Area.
For all VOCs, TPH, PCBs, antimony, beryllium, nickel, vanadium, and zinc, the maximum detected concentrations were used as the
EPCs as a conservative approach due to the relatively small sample size.
Although the maximum detected concentrations of benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, and pyrene were within the MassDEP
(2002) established background; all detected analytes were included as COCs in the nsk evaluation.
b The soil-bome fugitive dust exposure point concentrations were estimated from the soil exposure point concentrate according to the
following equation:
EPC dust = EPCsoii * PM 10 * Cl
EPCdust Exposure Point Concentration in Fugitive Dust (mg/m 3 )
EPCsoii Exposure Point Concentration in Soil (mg/kg)
PM 10 Respirable Particle Concentration - Commercial/Industrial Workers/Residents (mg/m )
Cl Unit Conversion Factor (kg/mg)
Calculated
Calculated
0.15
IE-06
Abbreviations:
COC = constituent of concern.
J \ 170 , 000 - 179 ,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dust Monitonngllow PH Area\171521 10 Exp Con\EPC
QA: CL Dale 4/15/15
in
in
£ <o
CL
o
2
®
LL
LU
_1
LL
O
a:
CL
LU
cn
3
CO
o
CL
III X
UJ LU
CD QC
< LU
o
o
m
co
T 3
CD
E
CD
CC
c/J
CO (/)
>- 3
O) -g
_ .£ co
D G (/)
0 aj co
CO 0
O C/D ^
Q- ^
2 s>
o.
o
<
LL
55 2 ?
CD LU >
< m
I
Q.
5
o
a
a
|
0
</>
O
a
CD
Q
CD
O)
CD
0
>
<
0
E
"O
c
CD
Q
Q
<
0
0
o
Q
0
O
0
O)
0
i_
0
<
0
0
3
O
0
O
o
“O
0
CO
Z>
if)
c
o
0
3
cr
LU
co
0
_3
>
O
4-
O
0
Q.
CO
xL
O
Q.
0
O
0
cl
c
o
0
3
cr
LU
c
o
0
3
O'
LU
O
0
0
c
</>
0
+■»
c
o
u-
*-*
(/)
0
O
0
>
■*-<
0
3
Q
O
3
0
O
CL
X
LU
>s
%
1 Z
■*->
0
Q-
£
3
8
a
x
LU
o
£
CL
LU
*
a
LU
LU
DC
o
CL
LU
CD
o
£
CL
LU
*
a
LU
LU
DC
o
CL
LU
0 .
<
CO
a
a
<
a
a
3
0
0
:x
co
0
O)
0
0
0
E
0
i_
0
CL
0
O
0
0
if)
0 ~
O
C
0
•g
‘3
O
oo
o
o
Ci
0 .
LU
Q
if)
if)
0
5
8
c
0
T 3
T3
o
L_
0
Q_
■4—'
o
0
o'
L_
CL
0
■O
0
5
o
CL
2 s
0
%
0
CL
if)
0
"O
1—
3
O
c
o
0
l—
3
Q
o
0
LO
<3
o
0
CO
c
o
CM
O >
E'
Q_
O
o
o
CM
CO
c
c
■R
"O
0
0.
LU
CL
LU
■O
0
1
c
CL
LU
o
t 5
o
t 5
0
\—
0
3
Q
(0
Q
<0
E
-3
LU
_l
0
- 4 —«
(0
O
if)
3
3
0
o
o
if)
(0
if)
CD
c
if)
O'
O'
0
0
0
0
0
if)
<
o
0
LU
LU
CO
o
_Q
<
P
O
0
0
>
>%
0
■o
lO
CO
CO
0
0
>N
I_ o
0 I s -
>* 0"
£ I
0 0
TO
LO
CO
CO
0
O)
0
L_
0
>
0
0 0
3 3
O' O'
0 0
O
4 =
-O "O
0 0
0 0
3 3
O O
0 0
o o
O
if)
>>
0
■g
>*
0
■g
O)
>»
0
0
0
>
c
0
>
if)
CO
CO
O)
if)
if)
—
O)
O)
5
if)
0
L_
0
0
E
O)
>»
X
c
3
O)
E
JJL
E
O)
E
O)
E
c
0
>
0
to
>%
0
■O
0
X
c
3
O)
jj*.
JX.
0
•O
0
-O
0
if)
o
o
> _
0 §>
O <
O) ®
2 -
0 0
> *=
TO O
.5 5
O
c n
_c
c
0 O
O 0
9 . £
>i CD
S ^
O o
0 o
O)
0
c
o
Q_
0
i—
3
0
o
CL
X
LU
0
0
CL
c
o
to
0
O)
c
o
C/D
>»
o
c
0
3
O'
0
C
o
o
o
0
Li.
c
o
0 .2
3
o
0 0 0
CL ^
o §
-O
<
i5 v_
c 2
3 CL
S 8
*=- 0
CL
3
0
O
CL
X
LU
3
if)
O
CL
X
LU
3 >
R ™
X 0
iu a:
c
o
co
L_
0
>
c
O)
0
>*
*o
o
CD
8
? 8
C C
8 S
1 o
0 0
CL CL
U) O)
C C
O) O)
0 0
0 0
> >
< <
O
Q
O
< 0-
_J LU
8
a:
Li. Q CL
LU LU LU
c o
^ S CL Q_
O CD < <
£
O
0
JO
if)
0
■O
0
3
o
8
O
0
c
0
00
0
c
o
l_
00
0
CD
0
>
to
3
■o
0
v_
3
0
o
Q.
X
0,
0
0
L_
c
o
oo
0
O)
c
0)
3
■O
■O
0
>
*c
0
*o
I
o
if)
E
X
v_
sz
"c
E
X
O)
E
E^
CO
l—
o
o
2
c
o
CO
I—
0
>
c
o
o
c
3
CO
o
o
o
o
O
i
0
CL
CO
CO
o
II
o
LU
CD
o
f- 10
■4—'
c
o
1
JZ co
LO
LO
_l
CD
CM
T ~~ d
0
3
CO
c
o
LU
co
co’
CM
o
X
a
LU
X
CL
>
X
o
i
CL
X
CM
Jl^
o
to
c
0
to
0
c
2
if)
0
o
to
0
ts
CL
c
o
to
0
O)
c
o
C/D
X
0
g
O)
E
o
0
0
_c
to
0
c
o
u_
to
0
O)
0
_c
(0
l_
0
c
0
to
3
0
0
CL
c
o
■4—>
00
0
O)
_c
<0
3
Q
3
o
Q
LU
c
o
3
a
o
o
■O
3
o
Q_
LU
Q
if)
if)
0
o
^r
i
O
0
JO
0
•" Co
rf a>
o ^
tr —
0
X
0
o
<
o
&
>
o
0
£
o
a)
E
£
a)
qj
E
aj
Q-
LLI
Q
a:
o
0
o <
Ji
' r_
c
o
<
1
’■ 4 —»
I
o
CL
0
o
o
5
l_
CL
O)
c
•C
t
0
4 -J
o
>
c
c
0
E
o
s
c
"co
o
c>
9
■>
c
c
o
LU
CO
pT"
E
» 4 —
o
>
'C
<d
Q
O)
o
c
0
o
LO
E
i
o
T—
tr
Q_
0
lO
CL
0
o
O
D.
—1
CO
LU
zz
Q
0
o
if)
o
3
-C
CM
o
tn
0
if)
3
if)
~o
0
2 CO
5
CM
if)
11
II
2 fe
i§
E ro
Q_
c LU
o q
if)
0 <0
i
o>
o>
r**.
o c
> 2
O to
ff 2
8
§
o cm *n
oo
(N CN O'
<D ^
r o>^
CD "«3-
Q.
6
Z
•i
il
111 m
-J 0
EE 2
o <
a: £
a. .2
TO
1
E
in
LU
CC
=D
o w
Vj lu -I-
2 2 <* c g
UJ 2 “S S’ 8
_J in ~ to
m CC O W
< UJ g- ~
o; ql _ _
O TO > 0)
5 TO UJ >
TO
i_
TO
>
LU
C
TO
o
<
X
Q.
5
o
UJ
O
5
3
co
O
CL
X
LU
CD
o
0
O)
0
i_
0
>
<
0
E
.0
73
c
0
LU
Q
<
3
CO
O
CL
X
LU
UJ
0
Q
0
O)
0
k-
0
>
<
0
0
3
O
0
O
o
"O
0
<O
3
0
C
o
0
3
cr
UJ
CO
3
o
0
>
5)
3
LL
0
C
L_
o
n
i
o
</)
o
c
o
3
J2
0
>-
i
I
I-
<
a.
LU
0C
Z>
CO
o
a.
x
UJ
in
TO
!»
O
&
0
0
>^|
CO
CO A
o
TO
X
CM
O
«
a.
UJ
#
Q
LU
UJ
O
CL
LU
CO
O
«
CM
O
«
CL
UJ
«
a
UJ
UJ
a
CL
LU
LU
D
<
S
uT
o
3
T3
O
'C
0
CL
O
0
o'
t—
CL
0
< £
TO Q
o u
z 0
II
c
0
co
3 ^
CO I
I *
I 2-
c 5s
<D 0
O “O
c
o
o
c
o
3
o
0
0
x
To
>%
0
"O
in
CD
co
CO
i_
0
0
>%
o
0
§L TO
1 .i
« ■ 4— '
0 <D
° ^ TO OJ
O T> o’
m co
E
o
CN
_X >-
c
o
0
3
O’
LU
»♦—
73
CL
UJ
5
73
0
c
c
0
0
O
in
I
E
0
1o
0
to
73
in
o
CO
c
c
O
TO
>N
(O
o
o
E
\—
<
o
O
in
CD
co
CL
UJ
0
o>
0
l_
0
>
0
0 0
3 3
cr cr
0 0
73
73
O
0
0
i
o
o
0
ZJ
0
3
UJ
CO
o CO
in
o
o
CO
00
m
m
o
O
_l
CM
o
o
T—
to
0
0
CO
o
CM
O
O
in
CD
i—
0
c
CO
l_
c
o
c
o
cn
CO
E
n
E
co
E
0
X
to
0
>
0
CO
l—
0
3
O
;C
O)
E
0
0
c
O)
O)
0
0
to
~Q)
3
cr
UJ
3
cr
UJ
Z)
E
3.
E
0
>
0
3
O
-C
>*
X
0
73
3.
0 (0
>N X
0 0
70 70
CO
3
a
I
o>
3
3
CO
a g
X
0 LU
3 ^
n
8. a
x aj
UJ cn
>• S
to ^
Q <
a> a>
O) c
0 E
0 0
> *=
< -I
c
o
>N
8 c
O TO Q
c §• 2
6 £ 3
D. ILO
I ? 8
3 c C
i_ O 0
O C O
o-2-Soo
0
0 0 0 0 O
3
CO
O
CL
X
3 3
CO CO
O O
CL CL
X X
LU UJ LU
c
o
3 g
a I
l2 8 8
O — —
TO TO TO
- 0. CL
1 ra o>
2 5) o>
0 0 0
>1—1—
C TO TO
- > >
< <
Q O co
Q. U. Q 0. CM CO CL O.
_J LUUILULUOO< <
O
<
O
o
CL
UJ
TO
TO
3
O
8
CO
O
CL
UJ
6
CO
73
0
Q.
CL
0
0
I
co
E
E
in
X O
Q_ CL
£ LU
0
>
c
o
0
0
73
c 2
8 *
o 3
c
o
0
3
cr
0
_ l_
S £
*
0
0
o
tr
0
CL
0
J3
0
L_
CL
CO
2
<
<
0
<8
c
o
o
0
o
L_
0.
c
0
E
c
o
l—
>
c
UJ
c
0
E
■tr
0
CL
0
Q
0
CO
3
H
o
0
CO
0
0
II
CL
UJ
O
co
0
> s
0 s
L_
J3
-Q
<
C
o
J:\170,000-179,999\171521 \171521 -00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust MonitoringMow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)\Parameters
TABLE I-6C File No 171521 10
RESIDENT EXPOSURE PROFILE ^*7/2015
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
o
O
5
o
o
<
*- Q-
s
Q
O
<
"O ©
3 -O
O 2
o
oo O
<N 05
□T 2
UJ £
Q - -o
05 ’C o
CO Q.*C
^ < s
<
z
<
z
■? *9
; 1
■o 5
ID (£)
O ID
!D O) - w ~
c O) ^ o> o
"O o - ©-
CD Q- Q- T3
t: UJ u UJ 0)
® n ® n c
= w ro c/5 i
© 05 g M w
cc (o o ro
O
2 a 2
O
^r
CD
£
o
'Y
o
CD
<
■s p
J
— ID ID
Q 2
? §
O lD
I ^
£ =
a> 8. = 8. & 8.
2 5
<0 V?
E oo
0) d)
S E
SE
&*
E g
<15 O
05 (0
CO li_
a> a)
2 <
® £j
<S CO
E D
a> .
**- a,
£ g
o B
S’ ®
E O)
03 (0
II
o £
gj 8
a
So § ®
■ s g g
co *n
£ S’
^ oo
cl £ Z.
$
CO
£ o
0. CL
< <
E .E
o O
LD
f -e € €
**r d) a> 0)
w x x x
•<fr 05 0 0)
O £ £ £
d) 05 .a> 05
a
ID
o:
>
a:
>
in in id
oo 2
J:\170.00O-179.999\171521\171521-O0.DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust MontonngMow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (Resdent)Parameters QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
Equations Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure (ADE) and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure (LADE)
S
S'
on m
jo ™
L ?S
•B
O
E. •
o 5 P
.rr -f n
& Z. T3
TO w u. -
0 ) x '
C | ® P
8 S.-S ®
5 (0 ® „
0-0^0)
O -T —
— JO CD "2
s sis t
E O) £ T-
•i a‘£ §
CO o
■2 Q __
® « (D
E
E
o
T
® <
CD
<
i I
*o —
<D C C
E ® ®
£
o
«=
o
p
IE
O
O
5
ID
_J
CD
<
CM
CM
m
o
s
d
<
Z
CO
p
IE
o
<
z
o
ID
_i
CD
<
CD
d
ID
d
r*»
§ £ <
o ® z
D
r>
E
I
j
Cl
o
CL
LD
CL
ID
■
o
a
2
£
2
5
3
o
0.
ID
ii
1
£
UJ
Q
<
1
1
s
5
I
CL
S
CO
£
c
3
o
o
B
CO
o
£
T3
O
•C
CL
CD
C
CD
CM
O
o
e
0.
<
CL
<
o
o
0.
ID
£3 CO
& |
2
a
1
*2
c
D
N
<
CL
ID
C/5
D
Z
<
<
J:\170,000-179,909\1 715211171521 -00.DEL12015 PM10 DenvatmnlDual Monitonngltow PH AreaV171521.10 Risk (Resldenl)Parametere QA: CL Dale: 4/15/15
r- in
-S
LL
m
ft
i
®
8
O
§
<
CL
o
o
z
UJ
o
o
z
(J
cl
<
o
z
o
z
o ■
'r z
a|
m <
< ^
h- CL
o
UJ
(0
z
c
CL
(4)
UJ
ZE
UJ
t»
O
Q
u.
O
>-
cr
<
2
2
D
03
I
!
03
i |
I 3
j 03
i -c Q-
o ^
> 2
l 51 — .V
: js as;
' 8 st
e
o:
«u
i
5
t
<
o
Z
P
f
2
E
8
§
o
o
E
I
f s s'
u, w ^ q_ .
mO) <d _ >
£=) t3 g o,
if I |I;
a 1° I S
O i: Q. H 3
•8 1 q i ^ '
nisi-
ods“J:
X 03 .Q O T) a> .
Ill
L o E
! 2 -i
! 6 >
l -Q -*
8
O
E
I
9
10
Z
O
i
s
§
°§
&5
Z
z
o
h-
5
<
X
z
o
LU
Ll
U-
UJ
O
z
LU
O
o
z
o
cr
<
o
z
o
1 1 s
E 2 S
Hi z
OQ O
< H
H <
5
a
o
■§
O) TO
co
sic
Q. S 2
CD > ©
<
o
CL
03
LU
a:
LU
0)
O
Q
u_
O
>■
(Z
<
5
:>
D
05
>. ©
■O £
o5 5
\E
c
<
8 T5
« 9 x
co tr
o.oo-
« i s i
r -2 g c
O 0) 2
•s | 1 2 f 1
CD o <D CD
C = ^ c
— 05 a o
O
o
o
CO CO CO CD CO Q.
CD CO CO CD CD ^
-C XT -C -C .C H
£ £ £ £ £ o
_co to
CO co
^ CD
2 E
0-1/5 0
s
a i o
S -5 i <2
5= o c o
» OT3 5
■ .9 ° 2 i
Is£S
liio
E
(D
0
C/5 3 j- 05 03 05
z 2 ® z z z
cl £ = a o o
03
z
o
co
* X X
Q o o
1 °
(DCOJCDCDCDCDCOCO-*-
^ ^ ^ ^ CD — «•-> O)
O )Q.Q)0)<Di3CD<D <D -<DCD<D'Q)<DOOO
ioinininininiomininin£2 in ‘£i2
^^OOOOOOOOOOOqOOO
° OOOOOOOOOOOqOOO
CM .p. CM CM
r~i *1? n c~>
O O O a £
T3 x: - - -
o o o o
OJQ.'O'O'OD-O'O
iflioinioioioioioioiou)
ooooooooooo
o ir> m m
04 04 CM ^
o m o o i-i
o o o o S
o o o o §
o o o o
o o o o
■ T3 T3 O T3 T3
o o o o ,
o o o o
O o c
* 1
€ »
'5.
S 5
Ni
£ a) r
g I ri
© o Q_ o
>>£<=?£
0. U-
OQ g
CM <
CO o
>*
>> £
£ fi
LU S
c < _ ^ _
S oT TO -D 03 -«c C O
--- -—- 05 NI
ii ? J) C ? r
— ^ - CD C 5
>. £* 3
X 05 <
CCDjOoOOOO
N N N N N
C C C C C
2 £ ~ 2
T5 2
2 "O x:
L1_ .9-
o X CD
m E P
JoajaajJI’-o)
° p -o CD SZ
xr £ s
(J Q LL
-E Z CL 0. O O
0 ) o
CL Z
— O
CD Z'
O O
h- CL
c 0 §i-3t_0) ^ § o
o .2 p .2 -2 p a -o b _ 3 o
EE^-^EqClE-ciO^EcdW
c!5c0(l)10£O>>Q)®'-4)r:!|].E
<<CDCOOOOO-jSZ05 03 >N
— CD
* ®
> £
o P
CL .2
CD ©
S 03
J
3- t
Z O
o
H-
<
o:
o
LU
X
o
E
<
.2 a>
E
UJ
£
O
CM 0
0)
5 E
&
2
I
O J— :
-I *:
iis
i & §
u) O
! § £
A &
2 i
f I
CD
fi
O 3
5 £
CD CD
- |!
c
- i
CD P
CO o
CD **-
y i
a. ra
1 3
2 "
s
3
"O
03 LU
® 8 E
Q- ^ o
■O CD CO
■§ > CM
a^P
3 ©
— ©
„ .1 i «
X
CL
X
CL
UJ
X
CL
>
< ^2
X o
CL ^
IAJ = .
x o. 5-
0- < O
5 S 8
-- TO O
•2 S * ®
X
E
TO t X
« 3
= o E
TO - 3
> O ©
^ f- 2
P S €
g t t
.2 3 r-
SIS
e s »
3 s o
O 3 p
i.5 3
1 2-1
E C
3 X *=
“oo
1
D
r 3
<0
3 03 TO JZ
S|Sg
O < < LU
>Q.tLQ
x: qj LU @
O m TO
| D 3 5
.2
I TO X3 6
a: ®
O J3
c 5
p %
i 5
a ®
S 2
to LU
0)
D
c Q. >
© LU "C-
TO O o
2 TO E
,8l|
^ © TO E
3fe £ J
w o
Jill
lj>l 5
<u — E
E 8 2
© 3 C
215
£ » e
Hi
TO o 2
>t_ «
u: 0.
9
QC
3
c
o
O
O
o
o
03
z
CL
> «3 C£
0.
LU
O
> £ <
^ o
TO p
c z
o C
a ©
TO Q
O "
n Z
< O
t- in
a
-S
a.
|®3
CL
<
5
t!
c
c
i
3
O
Ml
3 3
a o
o
ro
o
15
©
9
§
c
? ?
55 |
ro
.c
c
ro
c.
c
ro
o
o
15
o o
15 15
ro
.c
2 5
E i
E _
a> 'F'
-S) o
©>..=;
o) co ro
© c ©
i— ro -£
O) £
O
jB 'c "*2 E
j? => a: o>
? :
CO .
1 I
55 5
S, ”75
Q |0 n
ro ■£ o
j
o
a
9
HI
"T °? 9
HI LU UJ
in up ro
UJ UJ LU
cn <si cn
co to CN
UJ LLJ LLJ
8
-X
C
9
2
0 ) £
2 §
9
LU
9
LU
9 ? 9
UJ LU UJ
CO ro (O
N S N
CN CN Q
9 9?
UJ UJ UJ
CO co ro
N- fsj
£
g>,
8
O
(TJ CO CO CO
2 ! |
■f!
O -c
8
nCNCNCNnCNCNCNrtCNnnn
LicDCDCD L1 mmm t - 1 cD UL)L1
< o
; q q o ;
1
<• «= C 3
^ © © (/)
Q Q
a>
2
5 O
II
E
O
■C
o
8
>-
£
©
5
2
©
w c.
t £
O 4 ,
2 c
5 « !
±; S' O Q_ O
a, 5 >- J - “
c < Q- U-
0 .
2 g c
tj Q
2 ro to
u- il £?
2 o U-
16 ~ 2
Erg
* “ E £ ra rai ^ ?*r;s!!? cn co co © ° c ‘ fc 5 .3 _ ©
a> as £ © o>-^'o?iiiD(D(Diiii:- 92 Srai:>-'-’-cJ)^o^cniJ)ii!ro>
CD O UJ 5 l-XW<<CDCDCDCDCDOQu.£ZQ.Q.OOOl-Q-<<CDCDOOOO
II
X CD
iE
li
o *- in <w sj iu _l_ >n t— u) o u
h-X(/)<<C0C0C0C0C0OQu.£ZD Q-UUOl-Q-
1 § « p | | I
© ro -C O >« ni
looyo •
© £ ? o
© = ro c
(/? (/) > NJ
2
©
§>
I E>
<8
^ O
O X
O) ^
4±s ro
ro to
$ E
E 8
ro x
£ u-
^ a)
O
8
■O
<1) II
I 5
f £
ro ~
e >
3 X
S-fe
!“
< S’
c 3
s >•
II
ii
2J “
‘8^ ?.
3 * s ,
e "o
X .I,
2 8
;= c
o o o
0 . 2 z
© -C
3 e
to
8 ©
fl
5. ?
E 1
o
•fc ID
g N
c e
I 2
If
c c
c 2 g
?!o
§s §
c|j2*
8S* ©
.££©■£
2 j2 -D ©
5j!s
© _l to
o 2 t- (Nj
I 0. CD CD
< CD
o
Z
E
CT>
3 .
1
-X
£
v- ©
ro 2
c ro
i I
p ro
© TO
£ q
SC *=:
S 1
S 8
JA170.000-179,989V171S21\171521-00DEL\2015 PM10 Dwivrtion\DuBt Monitoring (low PH Aroa\171521.10 Chem lnfo\DRC QA: CL Drt«: 4/15/15
TABLE I-10C
RELATIVE ABSORPTION FACTORS
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 1
4/17/2015
Exposure Pathways
COC
Carcinogen
Oral Soil
Non-Carcinogen
2-Butanone
1 a
Acetone
1 a
Benzene
1 a
1 a
Carbon Disulfide
1 b
Ethylbenzene
1 a
Methylene Chloride
1 a
1 a
Toluene
1 a
Xylene (Total)
1 a
Styrene
1 a
1 a
Acenaphthene
0.3 a
Anthracene
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.3 a
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0 3 a
0.3 a
Chrysene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.3 a
0.3 a
Fluoranthene
0.3 a
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.28 a
0.28 a
Naphthalene
0.3 a
Phenanthrene
0.3 a
Pyrene
0.3 a
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
0.3 a
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
1 a
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
1 a
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
0.3 f
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1 a
1 a
Antimony
1 a
Arsenic
0 5 a
0.5 a
Barium
1 a
Beryllium
1 a
Cadmium
1 a
Chromium (total)
1 a
Copper
0.7 b
Cyanide
1 a
Lead
0.3 c
Mercury
0.5 a
Nickel
1 a
Selenium
1 a
Silver
1 a
Vanadium
1 a
Zinc
1 a
Notes:
a MassDEP 2014 ShortForm (v0414.xlsx).
b. RAF calculated from Table B-11 Default Absorption Efficencies
presented in MassDEP Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization
c. USEPA 2007. User’s Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake
Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK) Windows.
f. Value for Cl 1-C22 aromatic hydrocarbons used for total petreleum
hydrocarbon (TPH).
Notes:
1 A blank space indicates no data found.
2. Where data are lacking, a default value of 1 is used in subsequent risk
calculations.
Abbreviations:
COC = Constituent of Concern; RAF = Relative Absorption Factors.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521V171521 -00 DEl\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MomtoringUow PH Area\171521.10 Chem InfoVRAF
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/17/2015
TABLE MIC
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
RQsoil-oral
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC soil * IR soil * EF * ED * EP * RAF ora , nc * Cl
BW * AP nc
ADD S0l |^ ra i |_j| _
RfD
^ RQsoil-oral
COC
E PC soil
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora |_ nc
(unitless)
ADD S0 j|_ 0ra |
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
SubChronic
(mg/kg-day)
RQsoil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
i
3.4E-10
6.0E-01
5.6E-10
Acetone
0.100
i
1.3E-09
2.7E+00
5.0E-10
Benzene
0.0020
i
2.7E-11
1.0E-02
2.7E-09
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
i
1.1E-08
1.0E-01
1. IE-07
Ethylbenzene
0.014
i
1.9E-10
5.0E-02
3.8E-09
Methylene Chloride
0.022
i
3.0E-10
6.0E-03
4.9E-08
Toluene
0.0030
i
4.0E-11
8.0E-01
5. IE-11
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
i
2.7E-11
4.0E-01
6.7E-11
Styrene
0.0020
i
2.7E-11
2.0E+00
1.3E-11
Acenaphthene
0.43
0.3
1.7E-09
2.0E-01
8.7E-09
Anthracene
0.58
0.3
2.4E-09
1.0E+00
2.4E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.89
0.3
3.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.2E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
2.6E-09
3.0E-01
8.7E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
3.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.2E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.49
0.3
2.0E-09
3.0E-01
6.6E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
3.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.2E-08
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
4.0E-09
3.0E-01
1.3E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
1.9E-09
3.0E-01
6.4E-09
Fluoranthene
1.6
0.3
6.5E-09
4.0E-01
1.6E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
1.8E-09
3.0E-01
6. IE-09
Naphthalene
0.38
0.3
1.5E-09
2.0E-01
7.7E-09
Phenanthrene
1.1
0.3
4.4E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
Pyrene
1.4
0.3
5.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.9E-08
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
122
0.3
4.9E-07
3.0E-01
1.6E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
4.8E-06
6.0E+00
8.0E-07
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
4.6E-07
1.0E+00
4.6E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
360
0.3
1.5E-06
3.0E-01
4.8E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
4.1
1
5.5E-08
5.0E-05
1. IE-03
Antimony
16
1
2.1E-07
4.0E-04
5.3E-04
Arsenic
191
0.5
1.3E-06
3.0E-04
4.3E-03
Barium
115
1
1.6E-06
7.0E-02
2.2E-05
Beryllium
0.49
1
6.6E-09
5.0E-03
1.3E-06
Cadmium
0.40
1
5.4E-09
1.0E-03
5.4E-06
Chromium (total)
16
1
2.2E-07
2.0E-02
1. IE-05
Copper
294
0.7
2.8E-06
3.7E-02
7.6E-05
Cyanide
0.27
1
3.6E-09
6.0E-03
6. IE-07
Lead
2181
0.3
8.8E-06
7.5E-04
1.2E-02
Mercury
8.1
0.5
5.4E-08
3.0E-04
1.8E-04
Nickel
26
1
3.5E-07
2.0E-02
1.8E-05
Selenium
22
1
2.9E-07
5.0E-03
5.9E-05
Silver
2.4
1
3.3E-08
5.0E-03
6.6E-06
Vanadium
35
1
4.7E-07
9.0E-03
5.2E-05
Zinc
350
1
4.7E-06
3.0E-01
1.6E-05
^soil-oral “
1.8E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monltoringllow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Soil Ingest (Non-Cancer)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-11C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 2 of 2
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
LADD so n_ ora |
ELCR S oii-oral “
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPC soil * IR soil * EF * ED * EP * RAF orak; * Cl
BW * AP C
LADD S0 j|_ 0ra | CSF Total ELCR SO j|_o ra | =
X ELCR solk)ra |
COC
EPCsoii
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF 0 ral-c
(unitless)
LADDson^rai
(mg/kg-day)
CSF
(mg/kg-day)" 1
ELCRsojl-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
i
2.40E-12
NA
NC
Acetone
0.100
i
9.62E-12
NA
NC
Benzene
0.0020
i
1.92E-13
5.5E-02
1.IE-14
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
i
7.70E-11
NA
NC
Ethylbenzene
0.014
i
1.35E-12
NA
NC
Methylene Chloride
0.022
i
2.12E-12
2.0E-03
4.2E-15
Toluene
0.0030
i
2.89E-13
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
i
1.92E-13
NA
NC
Styrene
0.0020
i
1.92E-13
3.0E-02
5.8E-15
Acenaphthene
0.43
i
4.15E-11
NA
NC
Anthracene
0.58
i
5.60E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.89
0.3
2.58E-11
7.3E-01
1.9E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
1.87E-11
7.3E+00
1.4E-10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
2.64E-11
7.3E-01
1.9E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.49
1
4.69E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
2.67E-11
7.3E-02
2.0E-12
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
2.84E-11
7.3E-02
2.1E-12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
1.37E-11
7.3E+00
1.0E-10
Fluoranthene
1.6
1
1.56E-10
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
1.31E-11
7.3E-01
9.6E-12
Naphthalene
0.38
1
3.67E-11
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
1.1
1
1.04E-10
NA
NC
Pyrene
1.4
1
1.35E-10
NA
NC
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
122
1
1.17E-08
NA
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
3.44E-08
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
3.25E-09
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
360
1
3.46E-08
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
4.1
1
3.90E-10
2.0E+00
7.8E-10
Antimony
16
1
1.51E-09
NA
NC
Arsenic
191
0.5
9.17E-09
1.5E+00
1.4E-08
Barium
115
1
1.1 IE-08
NA
NC
Beryllium
0.49
1
4.71 E-11
NA
NC
Cadmium
0.40
1
3.89E-11
NA
NC
Chromium (total)
16
1
1.57E-09
NA
NC
Copper
294
1
2.83E-08
NA
NC
Cyanide
0.27
1
2.60E-11
NA
NC
Lead
2181
1
2.10E-07
NA
NC
Mercury
8.1
1
7.77E-10
NA
NC
Nickel
26
1
2.50E-09
NA
NC
Selenium
22
1
2.10E-09
NA
NC
Silver
2.4
1
2.36E-10
NA
NC
Vanadium
35
1
3.37E-09
NA
NC
Zinc
350
1
3.37E-08
NA
NC
Total ELCR S0 j| 0ra |.[p
1.5E-08
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when an RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170.000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust MonitonngMow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Soil Ingest (Cancer)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-12C
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 2
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
Inhalation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
See TABLE I-5C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale. See TABLE I-4C for
ADE dust -
EPCdusf *
EF * ED * EP * C2
AP nc
Exposure Point Concentration Derivation
HQdust =
ADE dust
HI i i =
S HQ dust
RfC
COC
EPC dust
ADE dust
RfC
HQdust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
3.8E-09
7.IE-10
5.0E+00
1.4E-10
Acetone
1.5E-08
2.9E-09
8.0E-01
3.6E-09
Benzene
3.0E-10
5.7E-11
1.0E-02
5.7E-09
Carbon Disulfide
1.2E-07
2.3E-08
7.0E-01
3.3E-08
Ethylbenzene
2.1E-09
4.0E-10
9.0E+00
4.4E-11
Methylene Chloride
3.3E-09
6.3E-10
6.0E-01
1.0E-09
Toluene
4.5E-10
8.6E-11
5.0E+00
1.7E-11
Xylene (Total)
3.0E-10
5.7E-11
4.0E-01
1.4E-10
Styrene
3.0E-10
5.7E-11
3.0E+00
1.9E-11
Acenaphthene
6.5E-08
1.2E-08
5.0E-01
2.5E-08
Anthracene
8.7E-08
1.7E-08
5.0E-01
3.3E-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1.3E-07
2.6E-08
5.0E-01
5. IE-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.7E-08
1.9E-08
5.0E-01
3.7E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1 4E-07
2.6E-08
5.0E-01
5.2E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
7.3E-08
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.8E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
2.6E-08
5.0E-01
5.3E-08
Chrysene
1.5E-07
2.8E-08
5.0E-01
5.6E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
7. IE-08
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.7E-08
Fluoranthene
2.4E-07
4.6E-08
5.0E-01
9.3E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.3E-08
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.8E-08
Naphthalene
5.7E-08
1. IE-08
3.0E-03
3.6E-06
Phenanthrene
1.6E-07
3.1E-08
5.0E-01
6.2E-08
Pyrene
2.1E-07
4.0E-08
5.0E-01
8.0E-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.8E-05
3.5E-06
5.0E-01
7.0E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
5.4E-05
1.0E-05
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
5. IE-06
9.7E-07
6.0E-01
1.6E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
5.4E-05
1.0E-05
5.0E-01
2. IE-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
6.1E-07
1.2E-07
2.0E-05
5.8E-03
Antimony
2.4E-06
4.5E-07
1.0E-02
4.5E-05
Arsenic
2.9E-05
5.4E-06
2.0E-05
2.7E-01
Barium
1.7E-05
3.3E-06
5.0E-03
6.6E-04
Beryllium
7.4E-08
1.4E-08
2.0E-05
7.0E-04
Cadmium
6. IE-08
1.2E-08
2.0E-05
5.8E-04
Chromium (total)
2.4E-06
4.7E-07
3.0E-04
1.6E-03
Copper
4.4E-05
8.4E-06
3.0E-03
2.8E-03
Cyanide
4. IE-08
7.7E-09
3.0E-03
2.6E-06
Lead
3.3E-04
6.2E-05
1.0E-03
6.2E-02
Mercury
1.2E-06
2.3E-07
3.0E-04
7.7E-04
Nickel
3.9E-06
7.4E-07
1.0E-03
7.4E-04
Selenium
3.3E-06
6.2E-07
3.0E-03
2. IE-04
Silver
3.7E-07
7.0E-08
1 4E-04
5.0E-04
Vanadium
5.3E-06
1.0E-06
1.0E-03
1.0E-03
Zinc
5.3E-05
1.0E-05
1.4E-03
7. IE-03
Hldustf
3.6E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J '170,000-179,999M71521M71521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust Monitoring\low PH Area\171521.10 Risk (FW-DEP parameters)Fugitive Dust (Non-Cancer)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE I-12C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521 10
Page 2 of 2
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Commercial/Industrial Workers
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-5C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale and TABLE I-4C for Exposure
Point Concentration Derivation
In
LADE dust
ELCRdust =
halation of Soil-derived Fugitive Dust
EPC dus , * EF * ED * EP * C2 *C3
AP C
LADE dust * UR Total ELCR dust =
2 ELCR(j US t
COC
EPC dust
LADE dust
UR
ELCR dust
EPC3
(mg/m 3 )
(pg/m 3 )
(pg/m 3 )' 1
(unitless)
2-Butanone
3.8E-09
5.1E-09
NA
NC
Acetone
1.5E-08
2.0E-08
NA
NC
Benzene
3 0E-10
4.IE-10
7.8E-06
3.2E-15
Carbon Disulfide
1.2E-07
1.6E-07
NA
NC
Ethylbenzene
2.1E-09
2.9E-09
NA
NC
Methylene Chloride
3.3E-09
4.5E-09
1.0E-08
4.5E-17
Toluene
4.5E-10
6.IE-10
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
3.0E-10
4.1E-10
NA
NC
Styrene
3.0E-10
4. IE-10
5.7E-07
2.3E-16
Acenaphthene
6.5E-08
8.8E-08
NA
NC
Anthracene
8.7E-08
1.2E-07
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1.3E-07
1.8E-07
2.1E-04
3.8E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.7E-08
1.3E-07
2. IE-03
2.8E-10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
1.9E-07
2. IE-04
3.9E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
7.3E-08
9.9E-08
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
1.9E-07
2. IE-05
3.9E-12
Chrysene
1.5E-07
2.0E-07
2.1E-05
4.2E-12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
7.1E-08
9.7E-08
2.1E-03
2.0E-10
Fluoranthene
2.4E-07
3.3E-07
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.3E-08
9.9E-08
2. IE-04
2.IE-11
Naphthalene
5.7E-08
7.8E-08
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
1.6E-07
2.2E-07
NA
NC
Pyrene
2. IE-07
2.9E-07
NA
NC
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.8E-05
2.5E-05
NA
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
5.4E-05
7.3E-05
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
5.1E-06
6.9E-06
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
5.4E-05
7.3E-05
NA
NC
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
6.1E-07
8.3E-07
1.0E-04
8.3E-11
Antimony
2.4E-06
3.2E-06
NA
NC
Arsenic
2.9E-05
3.9E-05
3.0E-03
1.2E-07
Barium
1.7E-05
2.4E-05
NA
NC
Beryllium
7.4E-08
1.0E-07
2.4E-03
2.4E-10
Cadmium
6.1E-08
8.2E-08
1.8E-03
1.5E-10
Chromium (total)
2.4E-06
3.3E-06
1.2E-02
4.0E-08
Copper
4.4E-05
6.0E-05
NA
NC
Cyanide
4.1E-08
5.5E-08
NA
NC
Lead
3.3E-04
4.5E-04
NA
NC
Mercury
1.2E-06
1.6E-06
NA
NC
Nickel
3.9E-06
5.3E-06
4 8E-04
2.5E-09
Selenium
3.3E-06
4.5E-06
NA
NC
Silver
3.7E-07
5.0E-07
NA
NC
Vanadium
5.3E-06
7.1E-06
NA
NC
Zinc
5.3E-05
7.1E-05
NA
NC
Total ELCR dus1
1.6E-07
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
\170,000-179.999M 71521 \171521 -00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dust MomtonngUow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (FW-DEP parametersJFugitive Dust (Cancer)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
File No 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/17/2015
TABLE 1-13C
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADD SO j|-oral
^Qsoil-oral ”
Exposure to Dust
EPC S0I| *
ADD SO j|_Q ra |
RfD
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IRsoi, * EF * ED * EP * RAF oral . ne * Cl
BW * AP nc
^ HQsoil-oral
COC
EPC soi |
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora i_ nc
(unitless)
ADD SO j|_o ra |
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Subchronic
(mg/kg-day)
RQsoil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
i
5.4E-11
6.0E-01
9.0E-11
Acetone
0.100
i
2.2E-10
2.7E+00
8.0E-11
Benzene
0.0020
i
4.3E-12
1.0E-02
4.3E-10
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
i
1.7E-09
1.0E-01
1.7E-08
Ethylbenzene
0.014
i
3.0E-11
5.0E-02
6. IE-10
Methylene Chloride
0.022
i
4.8E-11
6.0E-03
7.9E-09
Toluene
0.0030
i
6.5E-12
8.0E-01
8.IE-12
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
i
4.3E-12
4.0E-01
1.IE-11
Styrene
0.0020
i
4.3E-12
2.0E+00
2.2E-12
Acenaphthene
0.43
0.3
2.8E-10
2.0E-01
1.4E-09
Anthracene
0.58
0.3
3.8E-10
1.0E+00
3.8E-10
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.89
0.3
5.8E-10
3.0E-01
1.9E-09
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
4.2E-10
3.0E-01
1.4E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
5.9E-10
3.0E-01
2.0E-09
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.49
0.3
3.2E-10
3.0E-01
1.1E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
6.0E-10
3.0E-01
2.0E-09
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
6.4E-10
3.0E-01
2. IE-09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
3. IE-10
3.0E-01
1.0E-09
Fluoranthene
1.6
0.3
1. IE-09
4.0E-01
2.6E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
3.0E-10
3.0E-01
9 8E-10
Naphthalene
0.38
0.3
2.5E-10
2.0E-01
1.2E-09
Phenanthrene
1.1
0.3
7.0E-10
3.0E-01
2.3E-09
Pyrene
1.4
0.3
9. IE-10
3.0E-01
3.0E-09
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
122
0.3
7.9E-08
3.0E-01
2.6E-07
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
7.7E-07
6.0E+00
1.3E-07
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
7.3E-08
1.0E+00
7.3E-08
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
360
0.3
2.3E-07
3.0E-01
7.8E-07
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
4.1
1
8.8E-09
5.0E-05
1.8E-04
Antimony
16
1
3.4E-08
4.0E-04
8.5E-05
Arsenic
191
0.5
2. IE-07
3.0E-04
6.9E-04
Barium
115
1
2.5E-07
7.0E-02
3.6E-06
Beryllium
0.49
1
1. IE-09
5.0E-03
2. IE-07
Cadmium
0.40
1
8.7E-10
1.0E-03
8.7E-07
Chromium (total)
16
1
3.5E-08
2.0E-02
1.8E-06
Copper
294
0.7
4.5E-07
3.7E-02
1.2E-05
Cyanide
0.27
1
5.8E-10
6.0E-03
9.7E-08
Lead
2181
0.3
1.4E-06
7.5E-04
1.9E-03
Mercury
8.1
0.5
8.7E-09
3.0E-04
2.9E-05
Nickel
26
1
5.6E-08
2.0E-02
2.8E-06
Selenium
22
1
4.7E-08
5.0E-03
9.4E-06
Silver
2.4
1
5.3E-09
5.0E-03
1. IE-06
Vanadium
35
1
7.6E-08
9.0E-03
8.4E-06
Zinc
350
1
7.6E-07
3.0E-01
2.5E-06
Hloral =
2.9E-03
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEU2015 PM10 DenvationVDust MomtonngVIow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (1<2)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521 10
Page 2 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADDsoil-oral —
^Qsoil-oral —
Exposure to Dust
EPC S01| *
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IR S0 ,i * EF * ED * EP * RAF
* Pi
oral-nc ^ 1
X HQ S0 j|_ 0ra i
ADD SO j|o ra i
BW * AP nc
™soil-oral —
RfD
COC
EPC soil
RAF ora i_ nc
ADD SO j|_o ra i
RfD
HQsoil-oral
EPC1
SubChronic
(mg/kg)
(umtless^
(mg/kg-day)
(mg/kg-day)
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
1
2.3E-10
6.0E-01
3.8E-10
Acetone
0.100
1
9.2E-10
2.7E+00
3.4E-10
Benzene
0.0020
1
1.8E-11
1.0E-02
1.8E-09
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
1
7.4E-09
1.0E-01
7.4E-08
Ethylbenzene
0.014
1
1.3E-10
5.0E-02
2.6E-09
Methylene Chloride
0.022
1
2.0E-10
6.0E-03
3.4E-08
Toluene
0.0030
1
2.8E-11
8.0E-01
3.5E-11
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
1
1.8E-11
4.0E-01
4.6E-11
Styrene
0.0020
1
1.8E-11
2.0E+00
9.2E-12
Acenaphthene
0.43
0.3
1.2E-09
2.0E-01
6.0E-09
Anthracene
0.58
0.3
1.6E-09
1.0E+00
1.6E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.89
0.3
2.5E-09
3.0E-01
8.2E-09
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
1.8E-09
3.0E-01
6.0E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
2.5E-09
3.0E-01
8.5E-09
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.49
0.3
1.4E-09
3.0E-01
4.5E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
2.6E-09
3.0E-01
8.6E-09
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
2.7E-09
3.0E-01
9. IE-09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
1.3E-09
3.0E-01
4.4E-09
Fluoranthene
1.6
0.3
4.5E-09
4.0E-01
1 IE-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
1.3E-09
3.0E-01
4.2E-09
Naphthalene
0.38
0.3
1. IE-09
2.0E-01
5.3E-09
Phenanthrene
1.1
0.3
3.0E-09
3.0E-01
1.0E-08
Pyrene
1.4
0.3
3.9E-09
3.0E-01
1.3E-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
122
0.3
3.4E-07
3.0E-01
1. IE-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
3.3E-06
6.0E+00
5.5E-07
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
3. IE-07
1.0E+00
3. IE-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
360
0.3
1.0E-06
3.0E-01
3.3E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
4.1
1
3.7E-08
5.0E-05
7.5E-04
Antimony
16
1
1.4E-07
4.0E-04
3.6E-04
Arsenic
191
0.5
8.8E-07
3.0E-04
2.9E-03
Barium
115
1
1. IE-06
7.0E-02
1.5E-05
Beryllium
0.49
1
4.5E-09
5.0E-03
9.0E-07
Cadmium
0.40
1
3.7E-09
1.0E-03
3.7E-06
Chromium (total)
16
1
1.5E-07
2.0E-02
7.5E-06
Copper
294
0.7
1.9E-06
3.7E-02
5.2E-05
Cyanide
0.27
1
2.5E-09
6.0E-03
4.2E-07
Lead
2181
0.3
6.0E-06
7.5E-04
8.1E-03
Mercury
8.1
0.5
3.7E-08
3.0E-04
1.2E-04
Nickel
26
1
2.4E-07
2.0E-02
1.2E-05
Selenium
22
1
2.0E-07
5.0E-03
4.0E-05
Silver
2.4
1
2.3E-08
5.0E-03
4.5E-06
Vanadium
35
1
3.2E-07
9.0E-03
3.6E-05
Zinc
350
1
3.2E-06
3.0E-01
1. IE-05
^Ural ~
1.2E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2 COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\ 170 , 000-179,999\171521\171521-0O.DEL\2O15 PM10 DenvationVDust MonitoringUow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (7<8)
QA: CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE 1-13C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ADDsoji^rai
RQsoil-oral “
Exposure to Dust
EPC soil *
ADD SO j|_o ra i
RfD
via Gastrointestinal Tract
IR S0 „ * EF * ED * EP * RAF
BW * AP nc
* Pi
oral-nc 1
'■'soil-oral ”
X HQ so ,i_ ora i
COC
EPCsoii
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF ora |- nc
(unitless)
ADD SO j|^j ra i
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
SubChronic
(mg/kg-day)
HQsoil-oral
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
t
4.3E-10
6.0E-01
7.2E-10
Acetone
0.100
1
1.7E-09
2.7E+00
6.4E-10
Benzene
0.0020
1
3.5E-11
1.0E-02
3.5E-09
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
1
1.4E-08
1.0E-01
1.4E-07
Ethylbenzene
0.014
1
2.4E-10
5.0E-02
4.8E-09
Methylene Chloride
0.022
1
3.8E-10
6.0E-03
6.3E-08
Toluene
0.0030
1
5.2E-11
8.0E-01
6.5E-11
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
1
3.5E-11
4.0E-01
8.6E-11
Styrene
0.0020
1
3.5E-11
2.0E+00
1.7E-11
Acenaphthene
0.43
0.3
2.2E-09
2.0E-01
1.1E-08
Anthracene
0.58
0.3
3.0E-09
1.0E+00
3.0E-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0 89
0.3
4.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.5E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
3.4E-09
3.0E-01
1. IE-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
4.7E-09
3.0E-01
1.6E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0 49
0.3
2.5E-09
3.0E-01
8.4E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
4.8E-09
3.0E-01
1.6E-08
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
5. IE-09
3.0E-01
1.7E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
2.5E-09
3.0E-01
8.2E-09
Fluoranthene
1.6
0.3
8.4E-09
4.0E-01
2.1E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
2.4E-09
3.0E-01
7.9E-09
Naphthalene
0.38
0.3
2.0E-09
2.0E-01
9.9E-09
Phenanthrene
1.1
0.3
5.6E-09
3.0E-01
1.9E-08
Pyrene
1.4
0.3
7.3E-09
3.0E-01
2.4E-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
122
0.3
6.3E-07
3.0E-01
2.1E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
6.2E-06
6.0E+00
1.0E-06
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
5.8E-07
1.0E+00
5.8E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
360
0.3
1.9E-06
3.0E-01
6.2E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
4.1
1
7.0E-08
5.0E-05
1.4E-03
Antimony
16
1
2.7E-07
4.0E-04
6.8E-04
Arsenic
191
0.5
1.6E-06
3.0E-04
5.5E-03
Barium
115
1
1. IE-06
7.0E-02
1.5E-05
Beryllium
0.49
1
4.5E-09
5.0E-03
9.0E-07
Cadmium
0.40
1
3.7E-09
1.0E-03
3.7E-06
Chromium (total)
16
1
1.5E-07
2.0E-02
7.5E-06
Copper
294
0.7
1.9E-06
3.7E-02
5.2E-05
Cyanide
0.27
1
2.5E-09
6.0E-03
4.2E-07
Lead
2181
0.3
6.0E-06
7.5E-04
8. IE-03
Mercury
8.1
0.5
3.7E-08
3.0E-04
1.2E-04
Nickel
26
1
2.4E-07
2.0E-02
1.2E-05
Selenium
22
1
2.0E-07
5.0E-03
4.0E-05
Silver
2.4
1
2.3E-08
5.0E-03
4.5E-06
Vanadium
35
1
3.2E-07
9.0E-03
3.6E-05
Zinc
350
1
3.2E-06
3.0E-01
1. IE-05
HI oral =
1.6E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 DerivationVDust MonitoringVow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Soil Ingest (65)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE I-13C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY DOSES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR EXPOSURE TO DUST VIA GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 4 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
L-ADD S0 ||_ 0ra i —
ELCR SO j|_o ra i —
Exposure to Dust via Gastrointestinal Tract
EPCsoh * IR S oii * EF * ED * EP * RAF oraU * Cl
BW * AP C
LADD SO j|_ ora | * CSF Total ELCRsci^rai —
^ ELCR so ,i_ ora i
COC
EPCsoi,
EPC1
(mg/kg)
RAF oral<
(unitless)
L-ADD sol |_ ora |
(mg/kg-day)
CSF
(mg/kg-day)' 1
ELCR SO j|_ ra i
(unitless)
2-Butanone
0.025
i
3.IE-12
NA
NC
Acetone
0.100
i
1.2E-11
NA
NC
Benzene
0.0020
i
2.5E-13
5.5E-02
1.36E-14
Carbon Disulfide
0.80
i
9.9E-11
NA
NC
Ethylbenzene
0.014
i
1.7E-12
NA
NC
Methylene Chloride
0.022
i
2.7E-12
2.0E-03
5.43t-15
Toluene
0.0030
i
3.7E-13
NA
NC
Xylene (Total)
0.0020
i
2.5E-13
NA
NC
Styrene
0 0020
i
2.5E-13
3.0E-02
7.41E-15
Acenaphthene
0.43
i
5.3E-11
NA
NC
Anthracene
0.58
i
7.2E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(a)Anthracene
0.89
0.3
3.3E-11
7.3E-01
2 41E-11
Benzo(a)Pyrene
0.65
0.3
2.4E-11
7.3E+00
1.75E-10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
0.92
0.3
3.4E-11
7.3E-01
2.47E-11
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
0.49
1
6.0E-11
NA
NC
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.93
0.3
3.4E-11
7.3E-02
2.50E-12
Chrysene
0.99
0.3
3.6E-11
7.3E-02
2.66E-12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.48
0.3
1.8E-11
7.3E+00
1 29E-10
Fluoranthene
1.6
1
2.0E-10
NA
NC
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
0.49
0.28
1.7E-11
7.3E-01
1.23E-11
Naphthalene
0.38
1
4.7E-11
NA
NC
Phenanthrene
1.1
1
1.3E-10
NA
NC
Pyrene
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.4
122
1
1
1.7E-10
1.5E-08
NA
NA
NC
NC
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
358
1
4.4E-08
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
34
1
4.2E-09
NA
NC
Total Petroleum Flydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
360
4.1
16
191
1
1
1
0.5
4.4E-08
5.0E-10
1.9E-09
1.2E-08
NA
2.0E+00
NA
1.5E+00
NC
1.00E-09
NC
1.77E-08
Barium
115.455
1
1.4E-08
NA
NC
Beryllium
Cadmium
0.490
0.404
1
1
6.0E-11
5.0E-11
NA
NA
NC
NC
Chromium (total)
16.291
1
2.0E-09
NA
NC
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
294.000
0.270
2181 498
1
1
1
3.6E-08
3.3E-11
2.7E-07
NA
NA
NA
NC
NC
NC
Mercury
Nickel
8.079
26.000
1
1
1.0E-09
3.2E-09
NA
NA
NC
NC
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
21.836
2 448
35.000
350.000
-
1
1
1
1
2.7E-09
3.0E-10
4.3E-09
4.3E-08
NA
NA
NA
NA
NC
NC
NC
NC
Total ELCRo,ai:
1.9E-08
Notes:
1 Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
3. A default value of 1 is used when a RAF is otherwise unavailable.
J:\170.000-179.999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015
PM10 DerivationVDusI Momtonng\low PH Area\171521.10 Risk (Residenl)Soil Ingest (Lifetime)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14C
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 1 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Young Child, age 1<2)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
adf -
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
^ ^Qinh-dust
ML - ,t 'inh-dust
ADfEjnh-dust
AP nc
RfC
COC
EPC dust
AD^inh-dust
RfC
HQinh-dust
EPC3
Subchronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
3.8E-09
6.7E-11
5.0E+00
1.3E-11
Acetone
1.5E-08
2.7E-10
8.0E-01
3.3E-10
Benzene
3.0E-10
5.4E-12
1.0E-02
5.4E-10
Carbon Disulfide
1.2E-07
2.1E-09
7.0E-01
3. IE-09
Ethylbenzene
2.1E-09
3.8E-11
9.0E+00
4.2E-12
Methylene Chloride
3.3E-09
5.9E-11
6.0E-01
9.8E-11
Toluene
4.5E-10
8.0E-12
5.0E+00
1.6E-12
Xylene (Total)
3.0E-10
5.4E-12
4.0E-01
1.3E-11
Styrene
3.0E-10
5.4E-12
3.0E+00
1.8E-12
Acenaphthene
6.5E-08
1.2E-09
5.0E-01
2.3E-09
Anthracene
8.7E-08
1.6E-09
5.0E-01
3. IE-09
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1.3E-07
2.4E-09
5.0E-01
4.8E-09
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.7E-08
1.7E-09
5.0E-01
3.5E-09
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
2.5E-09
5.0E-01
4.9E-09
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
7.3E-08
1.3E-09
5.0E-01
2.6E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
2.5E-09
5.0E-01
5.0E-09
Chrysene
1.5E-07
2.6E-09
5.0E-01
5.3E-09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
7. IE-08
1.3E-09
5.0E-01
2.6E-09
Fluoranthene
2.4E-07
4.3E-09
5.0E-01
8.7E-09
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.3E-08
1.3E-09
5.0E-01
2.6E-09
Naphthalene
5.7E-08
1.0E-09
3.0E-03
3.4E-07
Phenanthrene
1.6E-07
2.9E-09
5.0E-01
5.8E-09
Pyrene
2. IE-07
3.8E-09
5.0E-01
7.5E-09
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.8E-05
3.3E-07
5.0E-01
6.5E-07
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
5.4E-05
9.6E-07
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
5.1E-06
9. IE-08
6.0E-01
1.5E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
5.4E-05
9.6E-07
5.0E-01
1.9E-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
6. IE-07
1. IE-08
2.0E-05
5.4E-04
Antimony
2.4E-06
4.2E-08
1.0E-02
4.2E-06
Arsenic
2.9E-05
5.1E-07
2.0E-05
2.6E-02
Barium
1.7E-05
3.1E-07
5.0E-03
6.2E-05
Beryllium
7.4E-08
1.3E-09
2.0E-05
6.6E-05
Cadmium
6.1E-08
1.1E-09
2.0E-05
5.4E-05
Chromium (total)
2.4E-06
4.4E-08
3.0E-04
1.5E-04
Copper
4.4E-05
7.9E-07
3.0E-03
2.6E-04
Cyanide
4.1E-08
7.2E-10
3.0E-03
2.4E-07
Lead
3.3E-04
5.8E-06
1.0E-03
5.8E-03
Mercury
1.2E-06
2.2E-08
3.0E-04
7.2E-05
Nickel
3.9E-06
7.0E-08
1.0E-03
7.0E-05
Selenium
3.3E-06
5.8E-08
3.0E-03
1.9E-05
Silver
3.7E-07
6.6E-09
1.4E-04
4.7E-05
Vanadium
5.3E-06
9.4E-08
1.0E-03
9.4E-05
Zinc
5.3E-05
9.4E-07
1.4E-03
6.7E-04
^^inh-dust-J^
3.3E-02
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,0O0-179,999\171521\171521-00DEL\2015 PM10 DenvationVDust MonitonngVIow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (Residenl)Fug Dust (1<2)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No 171521.10
Page 2 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Child, age 7<8)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
AD^inh-dust
HQinh-dust
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2
ADE| n h dust
O
c
Q_
<
Hljnh-dust —
^ ^Qinh-dust
RfC
COC
EPCdust
ADEj n h-dust
RfC
^Qinh-dust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
3.8E-09
2.5E-10
5.0E+00
4.9E-11
Acetone
1.5E-08
9.8E-10
8.0E-01
1.2E-09
Benzene
3.0E-10
2.0E-11
1.0E-02
2.0E-09
Carbon Disulfide
1.2E-07
7.9E-09
7.0E-01
1. IE-08
Ethylbenzene
2.1E-09
1.4E-10
9.0E+00
1.5E-11
Methylene Chloride
3.3E-09
2.2E-10
6.0E-01
3.6E-10
Toluene
4.5E-10
2.9E-11
5.0E+00
5.9E-12
Xylene (Total)
3.0E-10
2.0E-11
4.0E-01
4.9E-11
Styrene
3.0E-10
2.0E-11
3.0E+00
6.5E-12
Acenaphthene
6.5E-08
4.2E-09
5.0E-01
8.5E-09
Anthracene
8.7E-08
5.7E-09
5.0E-01
1. IE-08
Benzo(a)Anthracene
1.3E-07
8.8E-09
5.0E-01
1.8E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.7E-08
6.4E-09
5.0E-01
1.3E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
9.0E-09
5.0E-01
1.8E-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
7.3E-08
4.8E-09
5.0E-01
9.6E-09
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
9.1E-09
5.0E-01
1 8E-08
Chrysene
1.5E-07
9.7E-09
5.0E-01
1.9E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
7.1E-08
4.7E-09
5.0E-01
9 4E-09
Fluoranthene
2.4E-07
1.6E-08
5.0E-01
3.2E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.3E-08
4.8E-09
5.0E-01
9.6E-09
Naphthalene
5.7E-08
3.8E-09
3.0E-03
1.3E-06
Phenanthrene
1.6E-07
1. IE-08
5.0E-01
2. IE-08
Pyrene
2. IE-07
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.8E-08
C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.8E-05
1.2E-06
5.0E-01
2.4E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
5.4E-05
3.5E-06
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
5.1E-06
3.3E-07
6.0E-01
5.5E-07
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
5.4E-05
3.5E-06
5.0E-01
7. IE-06
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
6. IE-07
4.0E-08
2.0E-05
2.0E-03
Antimony
2.4E-06
1.5E-07
1.0E-02
1.5E-05
Arsenic
2.9E-05
1.9E-06
2.0E-05
9.4E-02
Barium
1.7E-05
1. IE-06
5.0E-03
2.3E-04
Beryllium
7.4E-08
4.8E-09
2.0E-05
2.4E-04
Cadmium
6. IE-08
4.0E-09
2.0E-05
2.0E-04
Chromium (total)
2.4E-06
1.6E-07
3.0E-04
5.3E-04
Copper
4.4E-05
2.9E-06
3.0E-03
9.6E-04
Cyanide
4. IE-08
2.7E-09
3.0E-03
8.8E-07
Lead
3.3E-04
2.1E-05
1.0E-03
2. IE-02
Mercury
1.2E-06
7.9E-08
3.0E-04
2.6E-04
Nickel
3.9E-06
2.6E-07
1.0E-03
2.6E-04
Selenium
3.3E-06
2. IE-07
3.0E-03
7. IE-05
Silver
3.7E-07
2.4E-08
1 4E-04
1.7E-04
Vanadium
5.3E-06
3.4E-07
1.0E-03
3.4E-04
Zinc
5.3E-05
3.4E-06
1.4E-03
2.5E-03
•■linh-tlust
1.2E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00 DEL\2015 PM10 Denvation\Dust MonitoringUow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (7<8)
QA CL Date 4/15/15
TABLE 1-14C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 3 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adult, age 65)
SUBCHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
adf -
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dus t * EF * ED * EP * C2
^ ^Qinh-dust
MUC mh-dust
AD^inh-dust
AP nc
RfC
COC
EPC dus t
RfC
^Qinh-dust
EPC3
SubChronic
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(mg/m 3 )
(unitless)
2-Butanone
3.8E-09
5.5E-10
5.0E+00
1.IE-10
Acetone
1.5E-08
2.2E-09
8.0E-01
2.8E-09
Benzene
3.0E-10
4.4E-11
1.0E-02
4.4E-09
Carbon Disulfide
1.2E-07
1.8E-08
7.0E-01
2.5E-08
Ethylbenzene
2.IE-09
3.IE-10
9.0E+00
3.4E-11
Methylene Chloride
3.3E-09
4.9E-10
6.0E-01
8. IE-10
Toluene
4.5E-10
6.7E-11
5.0E+00
1.3E-11
Xylene (Total)
3.0E-10
4.4E-11
4.0E-01
1.IE-10
Styrene
3.0E-10
4.4E-11
3.0E+00
1.5E-11
Acenaphthene
6.5E-08
9.6E-09
5.0E-01
1.9E-08
Anthracene
8.7E-08
1.3E-08
5.0E-01
2.6E-08
Benzo(a) Anth racene
1.3E-07
2.0E-08
5.0E-01
4.0E-08
Benzo(a)Pyrene
9.7E-08
1.4E-08
5.0E-01
2.9E-08
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
2.0E-08
5.0E-01
4.IE-08
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
7.3E-08
1.IE-08
5.0E-01
2.2E-08
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
1.4E-07
2. IE-08
5.0E-01
4.IE-08
Chrysene
1.5E-07
2.2E-08
5.0E-01
4.4E-08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
7. IE-08
1. IE-08
5.0E-01
2. IE-08
Fluoranthene
2.4E-07
3.6E-08
5.0E-01
7.2E-08
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
7.3E-08
1. IE-08
5.0E-01
2.2E-08
Naphthalene
5.7E-08
8.5E-09
3.0E-03
2.8E-06
Phenanthrene
1.6E-07
2.4E-08
5.0E-01
4.8E-08
Pyrene
2.1E-07
3. IE-08
5.0E-01
6.2E-08
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
1.8E-05
2.7E-06
5.0E-01
5.4E-06
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
5.4E-05
7.9E-06
NA
NC
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
5.1E-06
7.5E-07
6.0E-01
1.2E-06
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
5.4E-05
8.0E-06
5.0E-01
1.6E-05
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
6. IE-07
9.0E-08
2.0E-05
4.5E-03
Antimony
2.4E-06
3.5E-07
1.0E-02
3.5E-05
Arsenic
2.9E-05
4.2E-06
2.0E-05
2.IE-01
Barium
1.7E-05
2.6E-06
5.0E-03
5. IE-04
Beryllium
7.4E-08
1.1E-08
2.0E-05
5.4E-04
Cadmium
6.1E-08
9.0E-09
2.0E-05
4.5E-04
Chromium (total)
2.4E-06
3.6E-07
3.0E-04
1.2E-03
Copper
4.4E-05
6.5E-06
3.0E-03
2.2E-03
Cyanide
4. IE-08
6.0E-09
3.0E-03
2.0E-06
Lead
3.3E-04
4.8E-05
1.0E-03
4 8E-02
Mercury
1.2E-06
1.8E-07
3.0E-04
6.0E-04
Nickel
3.9E-06
5.8E-07
1.0E-03
5.8E-04
Selenium
3.3E-06
4.8E-07
3.0E-03
1.6E-04
Silver
3.7E-07
5.4E-08
1.4E-04
3.9E-04
Vanadium
5.3E-06
7.8E-07
1.0E-03
7.8E-04
Zinc
5.3E-05
7.8E-06
1.4E-03
5.5E-03
^^nh-dust-|
2.8E-01
Notes:
1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
J:\170,000-179,999\171521\171521-00.DEL\2015 PM10 Derivation\Dust MomtoringUow PH Area\171521.10 Risk (Resident)Fug Dust (65)
QA CL Date: 4/15/15
TABLE I-14C (Continued)
CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES
FOR INHALATION OF FUGITIVE DUST
Low pH Area Proposed Remediation Area
Everett Staging Yard
Everett, Massachusetts
File No. 171521.10
Page 4 of 4
4/17/2015
RECEPTOR: Resident (Adut, age 65)
CANCER EFFECTS
See TABLE I-6C for Exposure Variables
and Rationale
i a nc —
Inhalation of Fugitive Dust
EPC dust * EF * ED * EP * C2 * C4
L^L'^inh-dust
AP C
See TABLE I-4C for Exposure Point
Concentration Derivation
ELCR|nh-dust ”
LADE, nh „ ust *UR
Total ELCRj n h-dust —
X ELCR, nh _dust
COC
EPC dust
EPC3
EADEj n h-dust
UR
ELCRj n h-dust
(mg/m 3 )
(Mg/m 3 )
(Mg/m 3 )' 1
(unitless)
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylene (Total)
Styrene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Fraction
C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction
C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
3.8E-09
4.0E-09
NA
NC
1.5E-08
1.6E-08
NA
NC
3.0E-10
3.2E-10
7.8E-06
2.5E-15
1.2E-07
1.3E-07
NA
NC
2.1E-09
2.2E-09
NA
NC
3.3E-09
3.5E-09
1.0E-08
3.5E-17
4.5E-10
4.8E-10
NA
NC
3.0E-10
3.2E-10
NA
NC
3.0E-10
3.2E-10
5.7E-07
1.8E-16
6.5E-08
6.8E-08
NA
NC
8.7E-08
9.2E-08
NA
NC
1.3E-07
1.4E-07
2.1E-04
2.9E-11
9.7E-08
1.0E-07
2. IE-03
2.IE-10
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
2.1E-04
3.0E-11
7.3E-08
7.7E-08
NA
NC
1.4E-07
1.5E-07
2. IE-05
3.IE-12
1.5E-07
1.6E-07
2. IE-05
3.3E-12
7. IE-08
7.5E-08
2.1E-03
1 6E-10
2.4E-07
2.6E-07
NA
NC
7.3E-08
7.7E-08
2.1E-04
1.6E-11
5.7E-08
6.0E-08
NA
NC
1.6E-07
1.7E-07
NA
NC
2.1E-07
2.2E-07
NA
NC
1.8E-05
1.9E-05
NA
NC
5.4E-05
5.7E-05
NA
NC
5. IE-06
5.4E-06
NA
NC
5.4E-05
5.7E-05
NA
NC
6.1E-07
6.4E-07
1.0E-04
6.4E-11
2.4E-06
2.5E-06
NA
NC
2.9E-05
3.0E-05
3.0E-03
9. IE-08
1.7E-05
1.8E-05
NA
NC
7.4E-08
7.8E-08
2.4E-03
1.9E-10
6. IE-08
6.4E-08
1.8E-03
1.2E-10
2.4E-06
2.6E-06
1.2E-02
3. IE-08
4.4E-05
4.7E-05
NA
NC
4. IE-08
4.3E-08
NA
NC
3.3E-04
3.5E-04
NA
NC
1.2E-06
1.3E-06
NA
NC
3.9E-06
4 IE-06
4.8E-04
2.0E-09
3.3E-06
3.5E-06
NA
NC
3.7E-07
3.9E-07
NA
NC
5.3E-06
5.5E-06
NA
NC
5.3E-05
5.5E-05
NA
NC
Total ELCR, nh -dust
1.2E-07
Notes:
1 Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed.
2. COC = Constituent of Concern; NA = Not Applicable/Not Available; NC = Not Calculated.
\170,000-179,9991171521X171521-00.DEL12015 PM10
DenvationIDust Monitoringllow PH Area\171521 10 Risk (ResKlent)Fug Dust (Irfetime)
QA: CL Date 4/15/15
APPENDIX K
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
... TECHNICAL
' nONMENTAL
Ecological
Water
Construction
management
249 Vanderbilt Avenue
Norwood, MA 02062
781.278.3700
www.gza.com
August 18, 2015
File No. 01.0171521.10
Mayor Carlo DeMaria Jr.
Mayor's Office
484 Broadway
Everett, MA 02149
Mayor Martin J. Walsh
Mayor's Office
1 City Hall Plaza
Boston, MA 02201
Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone
Mayor's Office
93 Highland Avenue
Somerville, MA 02143
Mr. Stephen Crosby, Chair
Massachusetts Gaming Commission
101 Federal Street, 23 rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Ms. Alba Cruz-Davis, Public Health
Director
Everett City Hall Room 20
484 Broadway
Everett, MA 02149
Executive Director
Boston Public Health Commission
1010 Massachusetts Avenue
Boston, MA 02118
Health Department Director
City Hall Annex
50 Evergreen Avenue
Somerville, MA 02145
Re: Notification Pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan
Implementation of a Release Abatement Measure
(Former) Everett Staging Yard
1 Horizon Way
Everett, Massachusetts
Release Tracking Number 3-13341
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of Wynn MA, LLC, and in accordance with section 40.1403(3)(d) of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan
(MCP) GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA| is notifying you of the implementation of a Release Abatement
Measure (RAM) at the above-referenced Disposal Site (the Site). The objective of this RAM is the removal or
encapsulation of contaminants in soil in certain areas at the Site prior to the commencement of construction of
the Wvnn Resort in Everett. The RAM activities include in-situ solidification/stabilization (ISS) of contaminated
soil in one area of the Site, and excavation and off-site disposal of contaminated soil from another area of the
Site The RAM activities are expected to begin in September 2015, and last two to three months. If you have any
questions about these upcoming activities to respond to contamination at the Site please do not hesitate to
contact me at the telephone number above or Bob DeSalvio at 702-770-7000.
Very truly yours,
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
(7
Lawrence Feldman, LSP
Senior Principal
J:\ 170 ,000-179,999\171521\171521-10. DEL\RAM Plan - Pre-Constructic
Notice.docx
n\App K - Public Notice\171S21-l Wynn RAM Plan Public
'
